Does knee joint proprioception alter following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction?

Active exercise therapy improves the recovery of knee joint function and reduction of muscle atrophy after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation

OBJECTIVES

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is an important surgical therapy for recurrent patellar dislocation. However, few studies have focused on exercise therapy after MPFL reconstruction. Therefore, the first purpose was to compare the active and traditional postoperative exercise therapies on the recovery of knee joint function and reduction of muscle atrophy after MPFL reconstruction, and the second purpose was to compare the active and traditional postoperative exercise therapies on the patellar stability after MPFL reconstruction.

METHODS

The cases of 31 patients with recurrent patellar dislocation treated with patella double semi-tunnel anatomical MPFL reconstruction from February 2016 and February 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical outcomes, including the patellar tilt angle (PTA), lateral patellofemoral angle (LPFA), thigh circumference reduction, Kujala score, and Lysholm score, were compared between two groups (i.e., active exercise and traditional exercise groups) preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, 12 months postoperatively, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The Kujala score was significantly higher in the active exercise group than traditional exercise group 3 months postoperatively (80.06 vs. 74.80, P < 0.01), 6 months postoperatively (89.19 vs. 82.07, P < 0.01), 12 months postoperatively (91.43 vs. 86.60, P < 0.01), and 24 months postoperatively (92.50 vs. 90.27, P = 0.02). Similarly, there was a higher Lysholm score in the active exercise group compared with traditional exercise group 3 months postoperatively (81.25 vs. 76.53, P < 0.01), 6 months postoperatively (89.81 vs. 84.80, P < 0.01), 12 months postoperatively (93.25 vs. 88.40, P < 0.01), and 24 months postoperatively (93.69 vs. 90.67, P < 0.01). Significantly lower thigh circumference reduction was reported in the active exercise group compared with that in the traditional exercise group 3 months postoperatively (1.90 ± 0.57 vs. 2.45 ± 0.45, P < 0.01) and 6 months postoperatively (1.50 ± 0.31 vs. 1.83 ± 0.32, P < 0.01). No statistical difference was observed between the two groups in terms of PTA (P > 0.05) or LPFA postoperatively (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that active exercise therapy might benefit the early recovery of knee joint function and reduction of muscle atrophy in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation after MPFL reconstruction.

Protocols of rehabilitation and return to sport, and clinical outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with and without tibial tuberosity osteotomy: a systematic review

PURPOSE

No consensus exists on rehabilitation programmes after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) with or without tibial tuberosity osteotomy (TTO). This systematic review examined the content and timeline of rehabilitation (weightbearing, range of motion [ROM] and exercise therapy) and return to sport (RTS), as well as patient-reported outcomes after MPFLR with or without TTO.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Sciences, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus databases were searched from inception to December 2021. Studies that reported postoperative rehabilitation programmes and patient-reported outcomes for patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent MPFLR with or without concomitant TTO were included.

RESULTS

Eighty-five studies were included, 57 of which were case series and only one randomised controlled trial on rehabilitation programmes. Non-weightbearing was set within one week post-operatively in approximately 80% of weightbearing programmes for MPFLR without and with TTO. Joint immobilisation was set within one week post-operatively in 65.3% and 93.8% of programmes for MPFLR without and with TTO, respectively. Weightbearing and ROM (≤ 90°) restriction were within three weeks post-operatively for > 50% of the programmes. Quadriceps strengthening was the most cited exercise therapy (33 programmes), most often initiated within two weeks post-operatively. However, few other exercise programmes were cited (only nine programmes). RTS was mostly noted at six months post-operatively (35 programmes). The weighted mean Kujala score was 87.4 points.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of TTO addition to MPFLR, most studies restricted weightbearing and ROM only in the early post-operative period, with seemingly favourable clinical results. Limited information was available on post-operative exercise therapy.

Bilateral Hidden Isokinetic Quadriceps Performance before and after MPFL Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients

We perform prospective study to evaluate the isokinetic performance of quadriceps before and 1 year after medial patella-femoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with the adductor magnus tendon in the case of recurrent patellar dislocation. The present study is the first to describe the isokinetic function of the quadriceps of the involved and uninvolved extremity, in such a wide range. The MPFL is a crucial passive stabilizer of patella and, along with the conditions of the anatomical shape of the femoral-patellar joint and the function of quadriceps, influences the overall patellar stability. However, only a few studies have examined indirectly or directly the function of quadriceps. A total of 27 patients (average age at surgery was 15.8 years) with recurrent monolateral patellar dislocation were treated with MPFL reconstruction using the adductor magnus tendon. In the study group, healthy and operated quadriceps were evaluated for the following parameters at the velocities of 60 and 180 deg/s before surgery and in the follow-up examination: peak torque, peak torque to body weight, time to peak torque, peak torque angle, torque in 30 degree of the knee flexion (TQ 30 degree), and the torque in the first 180 milliseconds (TQ 180). Preoperative patellar instability and its normalization after MPFL reconstruction have no impact on the isokinetic quadriceps index value which depends on the time and degree of inactivity as well as implementation of appropriate physiotherapy. The increase in the quadriceps muscle strength of a healthy limb is responsible for the persistence of muscle isokinetic imbalance after MPFL reconstruction in pediatric patients. This is a level 2b study.

Objectively quantified lower limb strength recovery in people treated surgically or non-surgically after patellar dislocation: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Synthesize evidence on objectively quantified lower limb strength recovery in people treated surgically or non-surgically after patellar dislocation.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, AMED and CINAHL databases were last searched on July 30th, 2020 for randomized controlled trials and observational studies that objectively quantified lower limb strength in people (any age or sex) treated surgically or non-surgically after patellar dislocation.

RESULTS

24 studies were included (877 participants, median age 20.7). All assessed knee extension strength, 11 knee flexion strength, three hip abduction strength, two hip external rotation strength, and one hip flexion, extension, adduction, and internal rotation strength. One randomized controlled trial judged at high risk of bias and two cohort studies with methodological limitations compared lower limb strength recovery between surgically and non-surgically treated people, with conflicting findings. After surgery, median long-term (>8 months) knee extension strength was 82.5% (IQR 78.5-88.2; 13 studies) of the unaffected leg and knee flexion strength was 91.5% (IQR 90.7-96.9; five studies). After non-surgical treatment, median long-term knee extension strength was 86% (IQR 79.3-87.4; four studies) and mean flexion strength ranged from 95.2 to 96.7% (two studies). Mean hip strength was always >90% (two studies). Two redislocations during eccentric isokinetic knee testing and knee pain during isokinetic knee extension testing were reported as adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence indicates that after patellar dislocation, knee extension strength deficits in the affected limb are frequently observed and can persist long term, but this remains uncertain due to the limitations of relevant included studies. Whether lower limb strength recovery differs between people treated surgically and those treated non-surgically after patellar dislocation also remains uncertain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

(PROSPERO CRD42019139533).

Prognostic factors for isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Evidence concerning the influence gender, age, and the time elapsed from the first dislocation to surgery in the outcomes of Medial Patella Femoral Ligament (MPFL) reconstruction are lacking. This systematic review was conducted to investigate whether patient characteristics have an influence in the clinical outcomes of MPFL reconstruction for patients with patellofemoral instability.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study followed the PRISMA guidelines. The main databases were accessed in February 2021. All the studies reporting outcomes of primary MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability were considered for inclusion. A multivariate analysis diagnostic tool was used to analyse the association between age, gender and time from injury to surgery and the surgical outcomes at last follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 50 articles (2037 procedures) were included. The mean follow-up was 40.90 ± 24.8 months. The mean age was 23.6 ± 3.9 years. 64.3% (1309 of 2037 patients) were female. The mean time from injury to surgery was 64.5 ± 48.9 months. Women showed no statistically significant association with the Kujala score or complications. Older patients had a reduced risk to incur re-dislocations (P = 0.01) and revisions (P = 0.01). Longer time from injury to surgery was associated with greater risk to incur re-dislocations (P = 0.01), and with lower Kujala score (P < 0.0001). No other statistically significant association was evidenced.

CONCLUSION

The time span from the first patellar dislocation to the surgical reconstruction was a negative prognostic factor, while sex had no influence on surgical outcomes. The role of patients age on surgical outcomes remains unclear.

Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability: analysis of outcomes and risk factors

Background

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is always damaged after patellar dislocation. In selected patients, MPFL reconstruction is necessary to restore a correct patellar tracking. Despite the large number of different techniques reported to reconstruct the MPFL, there is no consensus concerning the optimal procedure, and debates is still ongoing. The present study analysed the results after isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with patellofemoral instability. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis of patients presenting pathoanatomical risk factors was made.

Methods

In November 2020, the main electronic databases were accessed. All articles reporting the results of primary isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability were considered for inclusion. Only articles reporting a minimum 12-month follow-up were eligible.

Results

Data from a total of 1777 knees were collected. The mean age of the patients involved was 22.8 ± 3.4 years. The mean follow-up was 40.7 ± 25.8 months. Overall, the range of motion (+ 27.74; P < 0.0001) and all the other scores of interests improved at last follow-up: Kujala (+ 12.76; P = 0.0003), Lysholm (+ 15.69; P < 0.0001), Tegner score (+ 2.86; P = 0.006). Seventy-three of 1780 patients (4.1%) showed a positive apprehension test. Thirty of 1765 patients (1.7%) experienced re-dislocations, while 56 of 1778 patients (3.2%) showed persisting joint instability. Twenty-five of 1786 patients (1.4%) underwent revision surgeries.

Conclusion

Isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability provides reliable surgical outcomes. Patients with pathoanatomical predisposing factors reported worse surgical outcomes.

Lateral retinacular release combined with MPFL reconstruction for patellofemoral instability: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The role of the lateral retinaculum in patellofemoral instability is still debated. Lateral retinacular release (LRR), has been extensively performed in combination with different surgical procedures, including reconstruction of medio-patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). Despite controversial indications, the results from these studies seem promising. The present study conducts a systematic review about current biomechanical and clinical evidence concerning the role of LRR in combination with MPFL reconstruction. We performed a comprehensive literature research, comparing the outcomes of MPFL reconstruction with and without LRR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was performed in August 2020. All articles describing the outcome of isolated MPFL reconstruction alone or in combination with a LRR in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability were considered for inclusion. Only articles reporting data on patients with a minimum of 12-month follow-up were included. Only articles reporting quantitative data under the outcomes of interest were included.

RESULTS

A total of 63 articles were eligible for this systematic review, including 2131 knees. The mean follow-up was 40.87 ± 24.1 months. All scores of interests improved in favour of the combined group: Kujala + 3.8% (P = 0.01), Lysholm + 4.2% (P = 0.004), Tegner + 0.8 points (P = 0.04), IKDC + 9.8% (P = 0.02). The ROM was comparable between the two groups (P = 0.4). Similarity was found in terms of positivity to the apprehension test (P = 0.05), rate of complications (P = 0.1), re-dislocations (P = 0.8), and revision surgeries (P = 0.1).

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence that adding a lateral release impacts positively on the outcome of MPFL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Systematic review.

Patellofemoral Contact Pressure for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Suture Tape Varies With the Knee Flexion Angle: A Biomechanical Evaluation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the knee flexion angle during graft fixation on patellofemoral (PF) contact pressure in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using polyester suture tape and knotless anchors.

METHODS

Nine human knees (mean age 74.9 ± 14.1 years) were used in this study. Polyester suture tape was fixed at the medial edge of the patella with two 3.5-mm knotless anchors, and then to the femur with a 4.75-mm knotless anchor at 4 different knee flexion angles (0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°). A pressure sensor was used to measure the maximum contact pressure (MCP) of the medial and lateral PF joints in the intact knee and in postreconstruction knees at each knee flexion angle (0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°). Each MCP was normalized to that of the intact knee. A statistical comparison was made between MCP in the intact and reconstructed knees.

RESULTS

The normalized MCP of the medial PF joint fixed at either 0° or 30° significantly increased at 60° of knee flexion (P = .036 and .042, respectively) and at 90° of knee flexion (P = .002 and .001, respectively). Conversely, the normalized MCP fixed at 60° and 90° remained at the same level as the intact knees at all angles of knee flexion. The normalized MCP of the lateral PF joint showed no significant difference at any fixation angle compared with intact knees.

CONCLUSION

To avoid excessive PF joint contact pressure after MPFL reconstruction, it may be best to fix polyester suture tape between 60° and 90° of knee flexion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Fixation of the polyester suture tape with a knotless anchor for MPFL reconstruction should be at 60° to 90° of knee flexion to most closely restore PF joint contact pressures to that of the intact knee.

Selective bundle tensioning in double-bundle MPFL reconstruction to improve restoration of dynamic patellofemoral contact pressure

PURPOSE

To evaluate the optimal graft tension angles in a medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with selective bundle tensioning in order to restore patellofemoral contact pressure distributions closest to the native state.

METHODS

Twelve human cadaveric knee specimens were mounted with the femur on a custom-made fixation device allowing free range of motion in the knee joint for testing. Using a sensitive pressure film (Tekscan) patellofemoral contact pressure was measured in 15° intervals during a dynamic flexion movement from 0°-90° in the native state, in cut MPFL and after MPFL-reconstruction with a gracilis tendon. The graft was separated in two bundles and was fixed independently on the patella using two knotless anchors. Two groups were made with either the proximal or distal bundle fixed at the femur at a knee flexion angle of 30° and the corresponding other bundle subsequently fixed at the femur at 15°, 45°, 60°, 75° and 90° of knee flexion using extra-cortical fixation and controlled tension of 2N in both groups. The sequence of the flexion angles at the graft fixation was alternated. Pressure measurements were repeated after every fixation of the graft.

RESULTS

Cutting the MPFL resulted in significantly reduced patellofemoral contact pressure at all flexion angles. After MPFL reconstruction the patellofemoral contact pressure remained significantly reduced during dynamic knee flexion in all tested double-bundle combinations (p < 0.05) except for fixation of the proximal bundle in 30° and the distal bundle in 75°. Selective evaluation of lateral patellofemoral contact pressure, however, showed significant reduction in all tested double-bundle combinations (p < 0.05) from 15° to 90°. Evaluation of isolated medial patellofemoral pressure changes showed no significant difference in all tested combinations compared to the intact knee. Furthermore, evaluation of the isolated proximal and distal patellofemoral contact pressure also revealed a significantly reduced contact pressure in all tested double-bundle combinations (p < 0.05) except for fixation of the proximal bundle in 30° and the distal bundle in 75°.

CONCLUSION

According to this study, selective bundle tensioning in anatomic MPFL-reconstruction should be considered as an easy and more anatomic alternative to current popular techniques to restore patella kinematics and give clear recommendation about knee flexion angle and tension during fixation. Although tensioning two bundles separately may further improve clinical results. If performed, fixation of the graft is recommended under low tension (2N) with the proximal bundle at 30° and the distal bundle at 75° of knee flexion.

Single- versus double-bundle patellar graft insertion for isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with patellofemoral instability: a systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The MPFL reconstruction is performed either via a single-bundle (SB) or double-bundle (DB) procedure. The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review comparing SB versus DB graft for recurrent patellofemoral instability, to summarize current evidence, and to clarify the role of both techniques. We focused on clinical scores, physical examination, complications, revision surgeries, and failures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In May of 2019 the main online databases were accessed. All the clinical studies treating isolated MPFL reconstruction for patellofemoral instability through a single and/or double-bundle graft were enrolled in the present systematic review. Only articles reporting primary isolated MPFL reconstruction, reporting a minimum of 12-months follow-up were considered for inclusion.

RESULTS

The scores of interest were in favour of the DB cohort: Kujala (+ 3.2, P = 0.03), Lysholm (+ 5.1, P = 0.001), Tegner (+ 0.3, P = 0.2), IKDC (+ 5.4, P = 0.01), VAS (+ 0.8, P = 0.3), ROM (+ 9.96, P = 0.04). In the DB graft, a reduction of overall complications (OR 0.59; P = 0.1), further surgeries (OR 0.64; P = 0.12) and re-dislocations (OR 0.61; P = 0.16) was observed. The SB group reported a reduction in the post-operative apprehension test (OR 2.42; P = 0.24).

CONCLUSION

Current study support the use of double-bundle tendon graft for isolated MPFL reconstruction in selected patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability.

Patellar fixation graft via suture anchors versus tunnel techniques during isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability: a systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

There is still a lack of evidence concerning the patellar fixation of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) graft in selected patient with recurrent instability. The purpose of the present study was to investigate and compare clinical outcomes and further complications of isolated MPFL reconstruction via suture anchors versus tunnel techniques for recurrent patellofemoral instability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. In September 2019, the main databases were accessed. All the clinical trials performing isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability were included in the present study. Only articles fixing the MPFL graft through suture anchors and/ or patellar tunnel techniques were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Data from 46 papers (1712 patients) were recorded. The mean follow-up was 40 ± 18 months. No differences were found in Kujala, Lysholm and Tegner score, International Knee Documentation Committee, visual analogic scale, range of motion and re-dislocation rate. The suture anchors fixation group detected reduced rate of apprehension test (OR: 0.6; p = 0.03), revision surgeries (OR: 0.4; p = 0.02) and anterior knee pain (OR: 0.05; p < 0.0001) and reduced not-classified complications (OR: 0.18; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Both the suture anchors and the bone-tunnels are a feasible option for isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability. Patellar fixation via suture anchors evidenced a reduced rate of anterior knee pain, revision surgeries, apprehension test and an overall reduced complication compared to the bone-tunnel technique.

Changes in knee extensor strengths before and after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

Quadriceps dysfunction has been suggested as a complication after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in knee extensor strength before and after MPFL reconstruction.

METHODS

Twenty patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction for unilateral recurrent patellar dislocation (18 females and 2 males; mean age 20.8 ± 7.6 years) were examined. The peak isometric torque at 60° and 90° of knee flexion and isokinetic knee extensor strength at speeds of 60°/s and 90°/s in operated and non-operated legs were measured using a dynamometer preoperatively and 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. The following parameters were evaluated: (1) body weight-adjusted muscle strength, (2) improvement index (post-/preoperative value × 100) (%), and (3) extensor strength ratio (operated/non-operated value × 100) (%).

RESULTS

The mean knee extensor strength in both operated and non-operated legs significantly increased 2 years after surgery compared with that before surgery. At 2 years postoperatively, the improvement indexes of the isometric knee extensor strength at 60° and 90° and of the isokinetic knee extensor strength at 60°/s and 90°/s were 237%, 192%, 318%, and 186%, respectively, in the operated legs and 144%, 124%, 140%, and 140%, respectively, in the non-operated legs. At 2 years postoperatively, the mean isometric knee extensor strength ratios at 60° and 90° and the isokinetic knee extensor strength ratios at 60°/s and 180°/s were 81%, 84%, 81%, and 82%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Knee extensor strength was improved in most patients after MPFL reconstruction, at least compared with that before surgery, although an approximately 20% deficit against the non-operated legs remained even 2 years after surgery.

Graft Choice in Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Rates of Recurrent Instability and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Autograft, Allograft, and Synthetic Options

PURPOSE

To determine whether graft selection or patient age affects the following after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction: (1) rates of recurrent instability, (2) rates of postoperative complications (other than instability), and (3) subjective symptom improvement.

METHODS

A systematic search identified studies reporting outcomes for isolated MPFL reconstruction. Rates of recurrent instability, subjective Kujala knee function scores, and complications were tabulated. Symptom improvement was defined as change in Kujala score (preoperative evaluation to final follow-up).

RESULTS

Forty-five studies were included with 27 documented cases of recurrent instability among 1,504 patients (1.8%); instability rates ranged from 0% to 20.0% overall; among autograft in adults, 0% to 11.1% (1.4%, 18/1,260); among autograft in adolescents, 0% to 20% (10.0%, 8/80); among allograft, 0% (0/65 cases); and among synthetic, 0% to 3.3% (1.3%, 1/76). Among autograft choices in adults, rates of recurrent instability were low; recurrence with gracilis ranged from 0% to 11.1% (0.9%, 1/116); with semitendinosus, 0% to 6.3% (0.6%, 4/676); with quad or patellar tendon, 0% (0/65); and with adductor tendon, 5.6% to 8.3% (6.7%, 2/30). Complication rates ranged from 0% to 34.4%. All included studies reported significant improvement in Kujala scores after surgery (P < .01). There was significant heterogeneity in effect size and evidence of reporting bias among small studies, precluding reliable pooled analysis of treatment effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Autograft is not superior to allograft or synthetic grafts for isolated reconstruction of the MPFL, and rates of recurrent instability are generally low. Isolated MPFL reconstruction can provide significant symptom relief regardless of graft selection, although there is a bias toward reporting better than expected results among smaller studies. Pediatric patients and patients treated with adductor tendon autograft have higher recurrent instability rates. While caution should be used in making definitive recommendations secondary to the small number of allograft and synthetic studies, selection of graft type based on surgeon preference, comfort, and prior experience remains appropriate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Impact of Knee Flexion Angle During Graft Fixation on Dynamic Patellofemoral Contact Pressure-A Biomechanical Study

PURPOSE

Objective evaluation of the optimal graft tension angle to fully restore patellofemoral contact pressure in reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) in comparison to the native knee.

METHODS

Twelve cadaveric knee specimens were fixed in a custom-made fixation device. A sensitive pressure film (Tekscan) was fixed in the patellofemoral joint, and patellofemoral contact pressure was assessed during a dynamic flexion movement from 0° to 90°. The MPFL was cut and measurements were repeated. Reconstruction of the MPFL was performed with the gracilis tendon subsequently fixed in the femur at 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90° of knee flexion under controlled tension (2 N). The sequence of the flexion angles was alternated. Pressure measurements were repeated after every fixation of the graft.

RESULTS

No significant differences were seen in the overall patellofemoral contact pressure compared to the native knee (P > .05). However, medial patellofemoral pressure showed a significant increased patellofemoral contact pressure after MPFL reconstruction at a knee flexion angle during graft fixation of 15° (P = .027), 45° (P = .050, P = .044), and 75° (P = .039). Moreover, proximal/distal patellofemoral contact pressure revealed a significantly reduced contact pressure at 15° (P = .003), 30° (P = .009), 45° (P = .025), 75° (P = .021), and 90° (P = .022) of flexion distal after MPFL reconstruction compared with the intact knee. Lateral patellofemoral contact pressure was significantly reduced in all performed reconstructions (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The flexion angle during graft fixation for MPFL reconstruction did not have a significant impact on the overall patellofemoral contact pressure. However, selective medial, proximal, distal, and lateral patellofemoral contact pressure was significantly altered for all reconstructions. Fixation of the MPFL graft at 60° of flexion was able to most closely restore patellofemoral contact pressure compared with the intact knee.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Based on the findings of the present study, fixation of the graft in anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL should be considered in 60° of flexion under low tension (2 N) to most closely restore patellofemoral contact pressure compared with the native knee.

The horizontal Y-shaped graft with respective graft tension angles in anatomical two-bundle medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Various techniques for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction have been described with two bundles of graft tensioned simultaneously. The present study was to introduce an anatomical reconstruction procedure using a horizontal Y-shaped graft with respective graft tension angles and report the preliminary results.

METHODS

A surgical technique for MPFL reconstruction using a horizontal Y-shaped semitendinosus tendon autograft with two bundles tensioned at 0° and 30° of knee flexion was described in detail. The patellar stability was evaluated with the apprehension test and an axial computed tomography (CT) scan at 30° of knee flexion. The knee function was evaluated using the Lysholm and Kujala scores.

RESULTS

No recurrent dislocation or subluxation was reported for 45 patients at a mean of 33.7-month follow-up. On CT images, congruence angle, patellar tilt angle, lateral patellar angle and lateral displacement were restored to the normal range. At the last follow-up, the mean Lysholm score improved from 51.8±6.2 to 91.7±4.1 and mean Kujala score was from 53.4±5.3 to 90.9±6.6 (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The present anatomical MPFL reconstruction technique with a horizontal Y-shaped two-bundle graft tensioned at respective knee flexion angles could not only recreate the fan-shape of MPFL but also mimic the function bundles of native ligament. Clinical follow-up confirms the good restoration of the patellar stability and significant improvement of knee function without special complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level IV.