Rapid chondrolysis of the knee after partial lateral meniscectomy in professional athletes

Meniscus Tears in Elite Athletes: Treatment Considerations, Clinical Outcomes, and Return to Play

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Management of meniscal injuries in the elite athlete is a difficult problem secondary to the high demands of athletic competition, the need for a timely return to sport, and the desire to maximize performance over time. The purpose of this review is to provide an up-to-date summary on the current literature and trends regarding the management of meniscus injuries with a special consideration for elite athletes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Historically, partial meniscectomy has been the primary treatment option for meniscus injuries. However, in recent years there has been an increased emphasis on meniscus preservation due to the increased risk of cartilage degeneration over time. Moreover, while partial meniscectomy still provides a quicker return to sport (RTS), recent literature has demonstrated similar rates of RTS and return to pre-injury levels between partial meniscectomy and meniscus repair. In the setting of symptomatic meniscal deficiency, meniscus allograft transplantation has become an increasingly utilized salvage procedure with promising yet variable outcomes on the ability to withstand elite competition. Currently, there is no uniform approach to treating meniscal injuries in elite athletes. Therefore, an individualized approach is required with consideration of the meniscus tear type, location, concomitant injuries, athlete expectations, rehabilitation timeline, and desire to prevent or delay knee osteoarthritis. In athletes with anatomically repairable tears, meniscus repair should be performed given the ability to restore native anatomy, provide high rates of RTS, and mitigate long-term chondral damage. However, partial meniscectomy can be indicated for unrepairable tears.

Repair of radial tears of the lateral meniscus on a stable knee: Results at a minimum follow-up of 2 years

INTRODUCTION

In younger patients, meniscal repair is recommended for isolated lateral meniscus tears that are most often due to acute trauma. But there is little published data on the outcomes of repairing this specific type of lesion. The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes, report the failure rate of repairing radial tears of the lateral meniscus in stable knees and determine the risk factors for failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who had a stable knee and underwent arthroscopic repair of a radial lateral meniscus tear between April 2013 and December 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Failure was defined as revision surgery for recurrence of symptoms (pain, locking) with intraoperative confirmation that the meniscus did not heal. The following data were collected: demographics (age, sex, BMI), time to surgery, clinical outcome scores (Tegner, Lysholm, IKDC), surgical details (repair technique, lesion zone, number of sutures).

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included having a mean age of 20.1years (14-31). The follow-up ranged from 24 to 110months (mean 66.8±25.2). An all-inside repair was done in 6 patients (20%); an outside-in technique was done in 17 patients (57%) and a combination of all-inside and outside-in was done in 7 patients (23%). Four patients (13%) had a recurrence of their symptoms later on, while participating in sports. All the recurrences were at the initial tear site. The time to revision surgery was 16, 19, 24 and 37months in these four patients (mean 24±9). All the other patients were able to resume sports at their pre-injury level. Significant improvement in the IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner functional scores were found between the preoperative and postoperative assessments. No statistically significant risk factors for failure were identified.

DISCUSSION

The functional healing rate after repair of a radial lateral meniscus tear in a stable knee was 86% at a mean follow-up of 5years, with the surgical technique having no impact on the long-term result. Most of the failures occurred within 2years of the repair procedure. We recommend repairing these tears as they have considerable healing potential.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective observational cohort study.

In elite athletes with meniscal injuries, always repair the lateral, think about the medial! A systematic review

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the time required to return to sports (RTS) after surgery, the rate of revision surgery and the time required for RTS after revision surgery in elite athletes undergoing meniscal repair or partial meniscectomy, particularly analysing the difference between medial and lateral menisci. It was hypothesised that both procedures would entail similar, high rates of RTS, with the lateral meniscus exhibiting higher potential healing postprocedure compared to the medial meniscus.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted based on the PRISMA guidelines. Quality assessment of the systematic review was performed using the AMSTAR-2 checklist. The following search terms were browsed in the title, abstract and keyword fields: 'meniscus' or 'meniscal' AND 'tear,' 'injury' or 'lesion' AND 'professional,' 'elite' or 'high-level' AND 'athletes,' 'sports,' 'sportsman,' 'soccer,' 'basketball,' 'football' or 'handball'. The resulting measures extracted from the studies were the rate of RTS, level of RTS, complications, revision surgery and subsequent RTS, Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

RESULTS

In this study, the cohort consisted of 421 patients [415 (98.6%) men and 6 (1.4%) women] with a mean age of 23.0 ± 3.0 years. All patients were elite athletes in wrestling, baseball, soccer, rugby or handball. While 327 (77.7%) patients received partial meniscectomy at a mean age of 23.3 ± 2.6 years, 94 (22.3%) patients received meniscal repair at a mean age of 22.1 ± 4.0 years. After partial meniscectomy, 277 patients (84.7%) returned to their competitive sports activity and 256 (78.3%) returned to their pre-injury activity levels. A total of 12 (3.7%) patients required revision surgery because of persistent pain [5 (1.5%) patients], chondrolysis [2 (0.7%) patients] or both chondrolysis and lateral instability [5 (1.5%) patients]. Ten (83.3%) of the twelve patients had involvement of the lateral meniscus, whereas the location of injury was not specified in the remaining two patients. After revision surgery, all patients (100%) resumed sports activity. However, after meniscal repair, 80 (85.1%) athletes returned to their competitive sports activity and 71 (75.5%) returned to their pre-injury activity levels. A total of 16 (17.0%) patients required partial meniscectomy in cases of persistent pain or suture failure. Of these, 4 (25%) patients involved lateral and medial menisci each and 8 (50%) patients were not specified. After revision surgery, more than 80.0% of the patients (13) resumed sports activity.

CONCLUSIONS

In elite athletes with isolated meniscal injury, partial meniscectomy and meniscal suture exhibited similar rates of RTS and return to pre-injury levels. Nonetheless, athletes required more time for RTS after meniscal repair and exhibited an increased rate of revision surgery associated with a reduced rate of RTS after the subsequent surgery. For lateral meniscus tears, meniscectomy was associated with a high rate of revision surgery and risk of chondrolysis, whereas partial medial meniscectomy allowed for rapid RTS but with the potential risk of developing knee osteoarthritis over the years. The findings of this systematic review suggested a suture on the lateral meniscus in elite athletes because of the high healing potential after the procedure, the reduced risk of developing chondrolysis and the high risk of revision surgery after partial meniscectomy. Furthermore, it is important to evaluate several factors while dealing with the medial meniscus. If rapid RTS activity is needed, a hyperselective meniscectomy is recommended; otherwise, a meniscal suture is recommended to avoid accelerated osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO-CRD42022351979 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=351979 ).

Long sports career and satisfactory clinical outcomes after Meniscal Allograft Transplantation (MAT) in young professional athletes involved in strenuous sports

PURPOSE

To assess the return to sport rate of young professional athletes, to analyze their careers in terms of matches played and league participation over a minimum period of 6 years after Meniscal Allograft Transplantation (MAT), as well as to assess the long-term clinical subjective outcomes and satisfaction.

METHODS

Thirteen professional athletes (ten soccer and one basketball players, one fencer and one wrestler) with a mean age at surgery of 23.4 ± 4.0 underwent MAT (six medial, seven lateral). The time required to return to sport, post-operative performance level and the number of reoperations were evaluated. At an average follow-up of 9.0 ± 2.8 years, Lysholm, KOOS and Cincinnati scores were administered and collected.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (100%) returned to sports practice after an average period of 11.8 ± 3.8 months. Nine athletes (69%) returned to sports at the same pre-injury level. Overall, 93%, 85%, 62% and 55% were active until the 3rd, the 5th, the 7th and the 9th season after MAT, respectively. Seven patients (54%) underwent a reoperation after MAT, where only two of them (15%) were related to graft problems (one meniscectomy and one graft suture). Of the ten athletes that completed subjective evaluation, the mean Lysholm score was 72 ± 15 (0% "Excellent", 10% "Good", 60% "Fair", 30% "Poor"). Of the athletes with lower scores, one suffered from patellar tendon rupture, one from post-operative infection and one from a previous femoral fracture. The mean Cincinnati knee score was 77 ± 18, while the average KOOS values were 60 ± 34 for sports.

CONCLUSION

Meniscal Allograft Transplantation (MAT) in young professional athletes involved in strenuous activities allowed all patients to return to pre-injury sport and in nearly 70% of cases at their pre-injury level. After five seasons following MAT, 85% of patients were still active or playing more than 20-30 matches per season. On the other hand, nearly 50% underwent at least one reoperation and only 70% of patients were rated as "Good", or "Fair" using the Lysholm score.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Meniscus Repair Part 1: Biology, Function, Tear Morphology, and Special Considerations

Knowledge of anatomy and physiology of the meniscus is essential for appropriate treatment. The unique anatomy of the medial and lateral meniscus and blood supply play an important role in decision making. Controversy exists regarding the optimal treatment of meniscal tears including débridement, repair, root repair, and transplantation. The unique tear location and morphology thus plays an essential role in determination of appropriate treatment. Repair is generally advised in tear types with healing potential to preserve meniscal function and joint health.

Posterolateral approach for all-inside arthroscopic lateral meniscus repair in athletes: technique and outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The past 2 decades have been marked by substantial progress in our knowledge of meniscus anatomy, function, and biomechanics, and also by the shifting of the surgical treatment of meniscal lesions from traditional meniscectomy towards arthroscopic repair to get away from the early osteoarthritis associated with meniscectomy. Posterior horn injuries of the lateral meniscus (LM) have been less studied due to their lower incidence and also due to the historical technical complexity of performing a repair in the posterolateral compartment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed of all athletic patients who had a peripheral longitudinal tear of the lateral meniscal posterior horn and who underwent at least one repair procedure with a posterolateral approach between 2014 and 2018. The type of injury, extent of lateral meniscal tear, and characteristics of sutures placed were assessed. Clinical assessment included objective and subjective IKDC ratings. The Tegner activity level score was determined before the injury and at the last follow-up visit. Failure was defined as a need for revision surgery. All complications were documented.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 24 athletes with a mean follow-up of 25.2 ± 10 months. The Tegner activity level was exactly the same before the injury as after the surgery. The mean IKDC score significantly increased from 41.8 (12.2) before the surgery to 94.5 (9.1) after. There were four reoperations for failure (16.6%) that required a new suture repair. None of these revised repairs sustained a new failure as of the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Despite the long learning curve, the posterolateral approach is a safe and effective technique for longitudinal tears of the posterior horn of the LM. The results of all-inside suture repair through a posterolateral portal are comparable to other techniques.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Plasty in High-Risk Young Adolescents: Revisions, Subjective Evaluation, and the Role of Surgical Timing on Meniscal Preservation

BACKGROUND

In adolescents, the rate of meniscal injury at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the rate of ACL graft revision, and clinical outcomes has not yet been investigated.

HYPOTHESIS

In patients younger than 16 years, the rate of meniscal injuries at the time of ACL reconstruction increases with time from injury. The mid-term revision rate and reoperation rate after ACL reconstruction with hamstrings and lateral tenodesis are lower than those reported in literature for isolate ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

METHODS

Patients younger than 16 years who underwent ACL reconstruction with hamstring and lateral tenodesis, with a follow-up ≥2 years were included. The number of meniscal lesions was stratified according to the delay between injury-to-surgery (<3, 3-12, >12 months). All reoperations, Lysholm score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales for pain (at rest and during activity), and return to sport were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients (mean age 14.8 ± 1.2 years) were included. Patients undergoing surgery at <3 months after injury had a lower meniscal injury rate (36%) than those treated at 3 to 12 months (55%) and >12 months (63%) after injury (P = 0.04). Medial meniscal lesions were more likely to be repaired when surgery was performed <3 months after injury (91%). Subjective follow-up data were available for 132 patients, and 19 were lost to follow-up. At 6.0 ± 2.6 years, 6% of patients underwent ACL revision; 1 of 20 (5%) patients with posterior tibial slope ≥12° and 4 of 45 (9%) patients with Tegner level ≥8. Nine new meniscal procedures were performed; 19% of repaired menisci underwent meniscectomy. Good or excellent Lysholm score was reported by 88% of patients; 56% of patients with concurrent lateral meniscectomy had pain during activity, 91% returned to sport, and 79% were still participating at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Patients younger than 16 years undergoing ACL reconstruction within 3 months from injury had the lowest rate of meniscal injuries. ACL reconstruction with lateral tenodesis had low revision rate (6%) and good or excellent clinical outcomes in 88% of young adolescents.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Sport physicians should be aware that adolescent patients undergoing ACL reconstruction within 3 months after injury have the lowest rate of meniscal injuries; the mid-term revision rate of ACL reconstruction with lateral plasty is lower than 10% and the patients' perceived outcomes are good with almost all patients returning to sport activity.

Risk Factors for Rapid Chondrolysis After Partial Lateral Meniscectomy: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Background

The occurrence of rapid chondrolysis after partial lateral meniscectomy is rare. The pathophysiology, risk factors, and outcomes of treatment have not been established.

Purpose

The primary aim of this study was to perform a scoping review of the literature to determine the potential risk factors and pathogenesis of rapid chondrolysis. The secondary objective was to report outcomes of treatment.

Study Design

Systematic (scoping) review.

Methods

A scoping review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the framework of Arksey and O'Malley. A search strategy based on the terms "chondrolysis" AND "knee," "chondrolysis" AND "meniscus," and "chondral damage" AND "lateral meniscus" was applied to the PubMed database on March 31, 2020. All relevant studies were included. Patient demographics and clinical data were extracted from these studies and analyzed in order to investigate the potential risk factors, pathogenesis, and outcomes of treatment for rapid chondrolysis.

Results

Five articles (22 cases) featuring rapid chondrolysis in the lateral compartment after partial lateral meniscectomy were identified and included. The condition occurred most frequently in patients who were young (mean age, 25.6 years), male (20/22 cases; 91%), and participating in high-intensity sports (19/22 cases; 86.4%) within 1 year of the index procedure. Half of the included study population underwent surgery for a radial tear. All professional athletes (13/13) returned to the preinjury level of sport. All authors of included studies suggested that the main causal risk factor was mechanical focal cartilage overload in the lateral compartment of the knee.

Conclusion

Rapid chondrolysis after partial lateral meniscectomy is a rare condition that typically occurs within 12 months of the index procedure. Younger age, male sex, high-intensity sports participation, and some meniscal tear patterns (eg, radial tear) are potentially important risk factors. Return-to-sport rates at short-term follow up are high, but no long-term studies were identified. The pathogenesis of rapid chondrolysis seems to relate to mechanical focal cartilage overload.

Meniscus tears accelerate joint space loss and lateral meniscal extrusion increases risk of knee arthroplasty in middle-aged adults

We sought to use publicly available data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI), a multicenter prospective cohort study, to determine the rate of joint space loss and likelihood of knee arthroplasty due to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-diagnosed meniscal tears or meniscal extrusion in middle-aged adults with no to mild knee osteoarthritis. Participants (n = 2199; mean age, 60.2 years) with Kellgren-Lawrence osteoarthritis grades 2 (mild) (48.7%) or 0 to 1 (none) (51.3%) underwent knee MRIs at enrollment and were followed radiographically for 8 years and for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for 9 years. Rate of joint space loss and risk of arthroplasty due to meniscal tears and/or extrusion were determined by multivariate modeling. Prevalence of baseline medial meniscus tears was 21.3% and lateral tears was 12.8%; 26.9% had medial meniscal extrusion (79.6%, <2 mm; 20.4%, +2 mm) and 5.4% had lateral extrusion (75.9%, <2 mm; 24.1%, +2 mm). Median medial joint space loss was 0.06 mm/y and lateral was 0.05 mm/y. Medial tears regardless of extrusion were associated with accelerated medial joint space loss (additional mean, 0.05 mm/y; P = .001). Lateral tears were associated with accelerated lateral joint space loss (additional 0.09 mm/y; P < .001) as was lateral extrusion (additional 0.10 mm/y; P < .001). The yearly incidence of knee arthroplasty was 0.5% without lateral extrusion, 1.5% with extrusion less than 2.0 mm, and 3.7% with extrusion greater than or equal to 2.0 mm. Both medial and lateral tears accelerate joint space loss in middle-aged adults. Lateral meniscal extrusion further accelerates joint space loss and increases risk of progression to TKA within 9 years.

Meniscal substitution, a developing and long-awaited demand

The menisci represent indispensable intraarticular components of a well-functioning knee joint. Sports activities, traumatic incidents, or simply degenerative conditions can cause meniscal injuries, which often require surgical intervention. Efforts in biomechanical and clinical research have led to the recommendation of a meniscus-preserving rather than a meniscus-resecting treatment approach. Nevertheless, partial or even total meniscal resection is sometimes inevitable. In such circumstances, techniques of meniscal substitution are required. Autologous, allogenic, and artificial meniscal substitutes are available which have evolved in recent years. Basic anatomical and biomechanical knowledge, clinical application, radiological and clinical outcomes as well as future perspectives of meniscal substitutes are presented in this article. A comprehensive knowledge of the different approaches to meniscal substitution is required in order to integrate these evolving techniques in daily clinical practice to prevent the devastating effects of lost meniscal tissue.

The popliteus tendon provides a safe and reliable location for all-inside meniscal repair device placement

PURPOSE

Repairs of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus can be technically challenging. In contrast to medial meniscus repairs, the capsule around the posterior segment attachment of the lateral meniscus is quite thin. This study evaluates the clinical results of an arthroscopic all-inside repair technique for unstable, vertical, lateral meniscus tears, using a suture repair placed directly into the popliteus tendon.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the SANTI database was performed. All patients who had undergone combined ACL reconstruction with lateral meniscus all-inside repair, using sutures placed in the popliteus tendon, between 2011 and 2015, were included. Patients were reviewed clinically at 1 and 2 years' follow-up. At final follow-up, all patients were contacted to identify if they underwent further surgery or had knee pain, locking or effusion. Symptomatic patients were recalled for clinical evaluation by a physician and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the knee. Operative notes for those undergoing further surgery were reviewed and rates and type of re-operation, including for failed lateral meniscal repair were recorded.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients (mean age 28.6 ± 10.2 years) with a mean follow-up of 45.5 ± 12.8 months (range 24.7-75.2) were included. The mean Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) at final follow-up was 85.0 ± 11.3. The post-operative mean side-to-side laxity measured at 1 year was 0.6 ± 1.0 mm. Twenty-six patients underwent re-operation (13%) at a mean follow-up of 14.8 ± 7.8 months. The ACL graft rupture rate was 5.0%. Other causes for re-operation included medial meniscus tear (2.5%), cyclops lesion (1.5%) and septic arthritis (0.5%). The lateral meniscus repair failure rate was 3.5%. No specific complications relating to placement of sutures in the popliteus tendon were identified.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic all-inside repair of unstable, vertical, lateral meniscus tears using a suture placed in the popliteus tendon is a safe technique. It is associated with a very low failure rate with no specific complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Knee Meniscus Injuries: Common Problems and Solutions

The rates of arthroscopic meniscus repair continue to increase with excellent reported outcomes. Complications, sometimes catastrophic, following meniscus repair may occur. The rate of postoperative complications may be reduced by adequate diagnosis, appropriate patient selection, meniscus repair selection, surgical techniques, and postoperative management. When complications occur, the provider must identify and take steps to rectify as well as prevent further complications from occurring. The purpose of this article is to detail the common diagnostic, technical, and postoperative pitfalls that may result in poor patient outcomes.

Management of traumatic meniscal tear and degenerative meniscal lesions. Save the meniscus

Meniscectomy remains one of the most frequent orthopedic procedures, despite meniscal sparing having been advocated for several decades now. Incidence is excessive in the light of scientifically robust studies demonstrating the interest of meniscal repair or of nonoperative treatment for traumatic tear and of nonoperative treatment for degenerative meniscal lesions. It is high time that the paradigm shifted, in favor of meniscal preservation. In traumatic tear, and most particularly longitudinal vertical tear in vascularized zones, repair shows a high success rates in terms of recovery time, functional outcome and cartilage protection. Leaving the meniscus alone may be an option in asymptomatic lesions of the lateral meniscus during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Posterior ramp lesions (in associated ACL tear), traumatic root tears and radial lesions are also excellent indications for repair, although it has to be borne in mind that the natural history of these lesions is not completely understood and nonoperative treatment also may be considered. Degenerative meniscal lesions are frequently revealed by MRI in middle-aged or elderly subjects. They are closely related to tissue aging and thus probably to osteoarthritic processes. Meniscectomy was long considered the treatment of choice. All but 1 of the 8 recent randomized studies reported non-superiority of arthroscopy over nonoperative treatment, which should thus be the first-line choice, with arthroscopic meniscectomy reserved for cases of failure, or earlier in case of "considerable" mechanical symptoms. Horizontal cleavage in young athletes is a particular case, requiring meniscal repair, to avoid a meniscectomy, which would inevitably be extensive in a young active patient. More than ever, the take-home message is: save the meniscus!

[Indication and limitations of meniscus replacement]

BACKGROUND

Meniscal lesions are among the most important musculoskeletal disorders and are the most common indication for knee joint arthroplasty. However, the structural integrity and function is rarely retained, and a loss of tissue results. Thus, there is a huge demand for meniscal replacement options.

CURRENT PROCEDURES

Autografts were used in the past but did not fulfill expectations. Meniscus allografts have been developed to be a viable treatment option. However, availability is limited and evidence of a long-term chondroprotective effect scarce. Artificial scaffolds made from either collagen or PCU foam are available, which aid the regeneration of meniscal tissue and are rather intended as a partial replacement with an intact peripheral rim. Those implants thus have a limited spectrum of indication. While they seem to be symptomatically effective, it remains unclear whether they can reduce secondary cartilage damage. Newer developments aim at a permanent replacement of lost meniscal tissue.

LIMITATIONS

In summary, there is currently no meniscal replacement available for a broad range of indications and with a solid scientific foundation. Prophylactic use should be limited to cases with a high chance of progression to osteoarthritis, like a lateral total meniscectomy. Otherwise meniscal replacement should be considered in younger, symptomatic patients with mild to moderate secondary changes. Potential causes of the initial meniscal injury like instability or deformities should be carefully assessed and addressed. In many cases, osteotomy might be a viable alternative to meniscus replacement.

Advances in combining gene therapy with cell and tissue engineering-based approaches to enhance healing of the meniscus

Meniscal lesions are common problems in orthopaedic surgery and sports medicine, and injury or loss of the meniscus accelerates the onset of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Despite a variety of therapeutic options in the clinics, there is a critical need for improved treatments to enhance meniscal repair. In this regard, combining gene-, cell-, and tissue engineering-based approaches is an attractive strategy to generate novel, effective therapies to treat meniscal lesions. In the present work, we provide an overview of the tools currently available to improve meniscal repair and discuss the progress and remaining challenges for potential future translation in patients.

Certified Athletic Trainers' Knowledge and Perceptions of Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis After Knee Injury

CONTEXT

  Posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) is a specific phenotype of osteoarthritis (OA) that commonly develops after acute knee injury, such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or meniscal injury (or both). Athletic trainers (ATs) are well positioned to educate patients and begin PTOA management during rehabilitation of the acute injury, yet it remains unknown if ATs currently prioritize long-term outcomes in patients with knee injury.

OBJECTIVE

  To investigate ATs' knowledge and perceptions of OA and its treatment after ACL injury, ACL reconstruction, or meniscal injury or surgery.

DESIGN

  Cross-sectional study.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

  An online survey was administered to 2000 randomly sampled certified ATs. We assessed participants' perceptions of knee OA, the risk of PTOA after ACL or meniscal injury or surgery, and therapeutic management of knee OA.

RESULTS

  Of the 437 ATs who responded (21.9%), the majority (84.7%) correctly identified the definition of OA, and 60.3% indicated that they were aware of PTOA. A high percentage of ATs selected full meniscectomy (98.9%), meniscal tear (95.4%), ACL injury (90.2%), and partial meniscectomy (90.1%) as injuries that would increase the risk of developing OA. Athletic trainers rated undertaking strategies to prevent OA development in patients after ACL injury or reconstruction (73.8%) or meniscal injury or surgery (74.7%) as extremely or somewhat important. Explaining the risk of OA to patients with an ACL or meniscal injury was considered appropriate by 98.8% and 96.8% of respondents, respectively; yet a lower percentage reported that they actually explained these risks to patients after an ACL (70.8%) or meniscal injury (80.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

  Although 84.7% of ATs correctly identified the definition of OA, a lower percentage (60.3%) indicated awareness of PTOA. These results may reflect the need to guide ATs on how to educate patients regarding the long-term risks of ACL and meniscal injuries and how to implement strategies that may prevent PTOA.

Articular Cartilage Degenerates After Subtotal/Total Lateral Meniscectomy but Radiographic Arthrosis Progression Is Reduced After Meniscal Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the degree of articular cartilage degeneration after subtotal/total lateral meniscectomy in patients who later undergo isolated lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (LMAT). It has not yet been studied whether arthritic changes as shown on radiographs were lower during the posttransplantation period than during the meniscus-deficient period.

HYPOTHESIS

Articular cartilage will significantly degenerate during the meniscus-deficient period, but the progression in radiographic arthrosis is reduced after LMAT.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed 49 patients who underwent subtotal/total lateral meniscectomy before isolated LMAT performed over 1 year later by the same surgeon. International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grades of the femorotibial joint at the time of subtotal/total meniscectomy and at LMAT were compared. Radiographic evaluation was performed at the time of initial meniscectomy, LMAT, and the latest follow-up in 38 patients (after 11 patients whose radiographs showed incomplete ossification at the time of meniscectomy were excluded). Arthrosis, based on Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grades, was determined on standing anteroposterior views. Joint space width (JSW) was measured on weightbearing flexion posteroanterior views.

RESULTS

Over a mean meniscus-deficient period of 4.5 years (range, 1-13 years), articular cartilage significantly degenerated on the femoral and tibial sides (P < .001). Grade ≥3 degeneration on the lateral tibial plateau was observed in 13 patients (27%) at the time of initial meniscectomy; this incidence doubled to 28 patients (57%) by the time of LMAT. The K-L grades worsened (P < .001) and JSWs narrowed significantly (-0.65 ± 1.09 mm; P = .001) during the mean meniscus-deficient period of 3.1 years. At radiographic assessment, however, the K-L grades (P = .097) and JSWs (4.06 ± 1.19 vs 3.92 ± 1.21 mm; mean difference, -0.14 ± 0.68 mm; P = .213) did not significantly change during the mean posttransplantation period of 3.8 years. The changes in ICRS grade and JSW during the meniscus-deficient period were not associated with age, body mass index, mechanical axis deviation, or Tegner activity level (P > .05 for all relationships).

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent isolated LMAT showed substantial articular cartilage degeneration at the time of initial subtotal/total lateral meniscectomy, and this degeneration progressed thereafter. Further progression of radiographic arthrosis was delayed after LMAT.