Kinematic alignment is bone and soft tissue preserving compared to mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Cartilage thickness can be accurately measured intraoperatively in total knee arthroplasty: A step further in calipered kinematic alignment

Introduction

Kinematic alignment (KA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is by definition a pure femoral resurfacing procedure aiming to restore the individual prearthritic anatomy. However, when a 2 mm compensation is systematically used on the worn side, the variability in cartilage thickness in the unworn compartment might alter the accuracy of the technique. This study aimed to validate two intraoperative femoral cartilage thickness measurement techniques by comparing them to the photographic method, which measures cartilage thickness through pixel analysis of bone-cut images. The study hypothesized that the two intraoperative methods are comparable and similarly accurate within 0.5 mm of the photographic method.

Methods

Seventy cartilage thickness measurements from seventy patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis were prospectively collected. Two intraoperative techniques were evaluated: the electrocautery tip method (Method A) and the ruler method (Method B), performed before and after distal femoral bone resections, respectively. The postoperative photographic analysis (Method C) served as the reference method. Measurements were rounded to the nearest 0.5 mm for consistency. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Spearman's rank correlation, percentage of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results

No significant differences were observed between Method A and Method B in measuring femoral cartilage thickness. Agreement with Method C was 100% for Method B and 85% for Method A. In the 15% of discordant cases, Method A overestimated the measurements by one category of 0.5 mm compared to Method C. Correlation coefficients between the methods were high (ρ = 0.88-1.0). Intra- and interobserver reliability was high for all methods (ICCs 0.91-0.95).

Discussion

Both intraoperative methods are reliable and comparable to the photographic method when rounded to the closest 0.5 mm, with no significant differences among them. The electrocautery method has the added advantage of measuring cartilage thickness before bone cuts are performed.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Novel technique for achieving the under-correction of native tibial varus in calipered restricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty - A validation study

Purpose

Restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) TKA is relatively newer technique for achieving an overall under-corrected limb alignment. The present study aims to provide an easy and reproducible technique for achieving calipered rKA-TKA (crKA-TKA) using routine instrumentation.

Method

A prospective study was conducted including 30 patients (30 knees). All patients underwent crKA-TKA by the same surgeon. Pre-operatively all patients underwent long film standing radiographs, and coronal angles were measured to plan tibial bony cuts and the femoral axis angle (FAA) to restore tibial varus under correction and native distal femoral anatomy, respectively. Intra-operatively while taking tibial cuts, the alignment rod was noted to be always pointing towards the "third metatarsal" of the ipsilateral foot.

Results

30 patients underwent total knee replacement with crKA technique. Angular corrections were satisfactory with all patients reaching the target MPTA of 87.48 ± 0.78 and LDFA of 90.301 ± 2.66 as planned, with an overall under-corrected limb alignment. HKA was achieved within a target of < ± 3 degrees of the native knee (3.56 ± 1.29). Post-operative radiological parameters were checked by two separate observers with excellent intra-class correlation coefficients.

Conclusion

The present study validates a novel intra-operative technique of confirming an under-corrected native tibial varus while performing crKA-TKA. The radiological outcomes of the study confirm that with careful pre-operative planning, coronal angular targets were easily achievable with very less outliers. Study further establishes that this method of calipered technique in rKA-TKA using routine digital templating software and standard instrumentations is an alternative method of executing rKA.

Level of evidence

IV, Prospective case series.

A Restriction Boundary-Based Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) Classification for Restricted Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background Coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification was proposed as a means of understanding the knee phenotype in leg alignment and joint line obliquity (JLO). However, when it is adapted to restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty (rKA-TKA), the boundaries of CPAK and those of rKA-TKA phenotype are different. We therefore reappraise the boundary between the CPAK classification and restriction protocol and propose a restriction boundary-based CPAK (Rb-CPAK). Methods Between May 2020 and March 2022, 143 knees in 95 patients underwent rKA at our institution and were included in this study. In Rb-CPAK, we set the following ranges: 6° varus to 3° valgus for arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), 0° to 6° varus for the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), 0° to 5° valgus for the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), and 169° to 180° for JLO. The pre- and postoperative alignments were classified using the original CPAK and Rb-CPAK. Results There were significant differences in pre- and postoperative distributions between original CPAK and Rb-CPAK (p < 0.0001). Postoperative Rb-CPAK primarily led to neutral aHKA (116 of 143 knees), and decreased MPTA varus (pre: 83.9 ± 3.4, post: 87.0 ± 2.3, p < 0.0001) and stable LDFA values (pre: 88.7 ± 3.1, post: 88.5 ± 2.7, p = 0.4) were observed. Among cases with neutral JLO, 78 knees required MPTA or LDFA corrections. Postoperatively, 67 (64%) out of 119 knees categorized as neutral JLO fell within MPTA and LDFA ranges. Conclusion The Rb-CPAK modification more effectively outlined knees that required restriction, and the restriction was properly performed compared with the original CPAK. However, JLO does not effectively indicate if a knee requires restriction or not, and thus individual evaluation of LDFA and MPTA might be necessary.

Total knee replacement with an accelerometer-based, hand-held navigation system improves knee alignment: reliable in all patients

BACKGROUND

Achieving adequate alignment has traditionally been an important goal in total knee arthroplasty to achieve long-term implant survival. While accelerometer-based hand-held navigation systems (ABN) has been introduced as a way to achieve alignment, there is a limited body of evidence on its accuracy, especially in patients under 65 years with differing etiologies for knee arthritis. This study aimed to assess the precision of a specific ABN system in restoring the mechanical axis and report surgical variables and complications, with particular attention to younger patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 310 primary TKA performed with ABN from May 2016 to February 2021. The mean patient age was 67.4 (SD 8.9) years, with 43% under 65 years and mean body mass index of 33.2 (SD 6.8). The average surgical time was 96.8 min (57-171) and the average follow-up was 3.3 years (1.9-6.7). Data regarding length of stay, pain, range of motion (ROM), complications, and reinterventions were collected from the institutional joint arthroplasty registry and the medical records. Preoperative mechanical axis measurements and postoperative radiological data, including mechanical axis, component alignment and mechanical alignment outliers were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative mechanical axis was 175.4° (SD 7.6), with 248 knees (80%) in preoperative varus. The mean postoperative mechanical axis was 179.5° (SD 1.96) with 98% of knees falling within ± 3° of the neutral mechanical axis. Only 6 knees (2 varus, 4 valgus) fell outside the ± 3° range. And 3 knees (1 varus, 2 valgus) fell outside the ± 5° range. In the sagittal plane, 296 knees (95.5%) knees were within ± 3° of goal of 3 degrees of femoral flexion and 302 (97.4%) knees were within ± 2° of goal 1° of slope for tibial component. Far outliers (alignment outside ± 5° of targeted position) were found in 3 knees. Factors such as posttraumatic arthrosis, previous surgery, presence of retained hardware, and age below 65 years were not associated with increase in alignment outliers and far outliers. No complications related to the navigation system were observed. There were 22 complications and 20 reoperations, including 2 revisions for periprosthetic joint infection and 1 revision for flexion instability. Patients that required knee manipulation achieved an ultimate flexion of 110° (SD 14.1).

CONCLUSIONS

The ABN system proved to be user-friendly and accurate in reducing alignment outliers in both coronal and sagittal planes in all patient populations. It offers a straightforward navigation solution while preserving surgeon autonomy and the use of traditional surgical tools. These findings advocate for the integration of this navigation system as a valuable tool to enhance the precision of TKA surgery in all patient groups.

No Difference in Limb Alignment Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Individualized alignment techniques have gained major interest in an effort to increase satisfaction among total knee arthroplasty patients. This study aimed to compare postoperative alignment between kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) and assess whether KA significantly deviates from the principle of aligning the limb as close to neutral alignment as possible.

METHODS

There were 234 patients who underwent robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty using an unrestricted KA and a strict MA technique (KA: 145, MA: 89). The lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibia angle, and the resultant arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) were measured. The aHKA < 0 indicated varus alignment, while the aHKA > 0 indicated valgus knee alignment. The primary outcome was the frequency of cases that resulted in an aHKA of ± 4° of neutral (0°), as assessed on full-leg standing radiographs obtained at 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcome was the change in coronal plane alignment of the knee classification type from preoperative to postoperative between the MA and KA groups.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative aHKA was similar between the 2 groups (P = .19). The KA group had a mean postoperative aHKA of -1.4 ± 2.4°, while the MA group had a mean postoperative aHKA of -0.5 ± 2.1°. No significant difference in limb alignment was identified between KA and MA cases that resulted in hip-knee-ankle angle of ± 4° being neutral (91.7 versus 96.6%, P = .14). There were 97.2% of cases in the KA group that fell within the ± 5° range. The MA group was associated with a significantly higher rate of coronal plane alignment of the knee classification type change from preoperatively to postoperatively (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Kinematic alignment achieved similar postoperative aHKA compared to MA, and thus did not significantly deviate from the principle of aligning the limb as close to neutral alignment as possible. Surgeons should feel comfortable starting to introduce individualized alignment techniques. Without being restricted by boundaries, postoperative alignment will be within 5 degrees of neutral 97% of the time.

Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Avoid Crossing Over From Varus to Valgus

BACKGROUND

Ideal target limb alignment remains a debated topic in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aimed to determine the effect of limb alignment correction on patient-reported outcomes and knee range of motion (ROM) following TKA.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, patients (N = 409) undergoing primary TKA at a single institution were studied. Using full leg-length radiographs, limb alignment was measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Patients were categorized by preoperative (Preop) alignment (varus > 0°; valgus < 0°). Preop varus patients were then divided as follows based on postoperative alignment: neutral (VAR-NEUT, 0°± 2), remaining in varus (VAR-rVAR, ≥3°), and cross-over to valgus (VAR-CO, ≤-3°). Similarly, Preop valgus patients were divided as follows for postoperative alignment: neutral (VAL-NEUT, 0°± 2), remaining in valgus (VAL-rVAL, ≤-3°), and cross-over to varus (VAL-CO, ≥3°). The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement survey scores were collected at preoperatively as well as at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Knee ROM was collected at 2 weeks, 6 to 12 weeks, and >6 months postoperatively. An analysis of variance repeated on time followed by a Bonferroni post hoc test was used to compare outcomes for the postoperative alignment subgroups.

RESULTS

Preop Varus patients: Those in the VAR-CO group (overcorrected to -4.03° ± 1.95valgus) were observed to have lower Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement scores at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively compared to those in the NEUT group (P < .05). This finding was paired with reduced ROM at 6 to 12 weeks postoperatively in the VAR-CO group compared to VAR-NEUT and VAR-rVAR (P < .05). Preop Valgus patients: Those in the VAL-rVal group (left in -4.39° ± 1.39valgus) were observed to have reduced knee flexion at 6 to 12 weeks postoperatively compared to VAL-NEUT and VAL-CO.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that postoperative valgus alignment via either crossing over to valgus (VAR-CO) or remaining in valgus (VAL-rVAL) alignment may result in less preferable outcomes than correction to neutral or slightly varus alignment.

Kinematic Alignment Achieves a More Balanced Total Knee Arthroplasty Than Mechanical Alignment among CPAK Type I Patients: A Simulation Study

Background: There is no consensus on whether mechanical alignment (MA) or kinematic alignment (KA) should be chosen for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) Type I with a varus arithmetic HKA (aHKA) and apex distal joint line obliquity (JLO). The aim of this study was to investigate whether MA or KA is preferable for soft tissue balancing in TKA for this phenotype. Method: This prospective cohort study included 64 knees with CPAK Type I osteoarthritis that had undergone cruciate-retaining TKA. Using optical tracking software, we simulated implant placement in the Mako system before making the actual bone cut and compared the results between MA and KA. Extension balance (the difference between medial and lateral gaps in extension) and medial balance (the difference in medial gaps in flexion and extension) were examined. These gap differences within 2 mm were defined as good balance. Achievement of overall balance was defined as an attainment of good extension and medial balance. The incidence of balance in each patient was compared with an independent sample ratio test. Results: Compared with the MA group, the KA group achieved better soft tissue balance in extension balance (p < 0.001). A total of 75% of the patients in the KA group achieved overall balance, which was greater than the 38% achieved in the MA group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In robot-assisted TKA for CPAK Type I osteoarthritis, KA achieved knee balance during extension without soft tissue release in a greater percentage of patients than MA.

Methods of alignment in total knee arthroplasty, systematic review

Introduction

Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a very frequent surgery, one in five patients is not completely satisfied. Mechanical alignment (MA) is the most popular technique for implanting TKA. However, to improve clinical outcomes, new techniques that aim to rebuild the native alignment of the knee have been developed.

Objective

The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of the available clinical trials and observational studies comparing clinical and radiological outcomes of different methods of alignment (kinematic, anatomic, functional) to MA.

Methods

A systematic review is performed comparing results of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) questionnaires (WOMAC, OKS, KSS, KOOS, FJS), radiological angles (HKA, mLDFA, MPTA, JLOA, femoral rotation and tibial slope) and range of motion (ROM).

Results

Kinematic and functional alignment show a slight tendency to obtain better PROMs compared to mechanical alignment. Complication rates were not significantly different between groups. Nevertheless, these results are not consistent in every study. Anatomic alignment showed no significant differences compared to mechanical alignment.

Conclusion

Kinematic alignment is an equal or slightly better alternative than mechanical alignment for patients included in this study. However, the difference between methods does not seem to be enough to explain the high percentage of dissatisfied patients. Studies implementing lax inclusion and exclusion criteria would be needed to resemble conditions of patients assisted in daily surgical practice. It would be interesting to study patient's knee phenotypes, to notice if any method of alignment is significantly better for any constitutional deviation.

Posterior tibial slope considered as an important addition to the CPAK classification system

Introduction

Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK), is an informative way to classify native knee alignment types, but does not consider posterior tibial slope, an important variable in knee kinematics. We hypothesized that tibial slope would have a significant effect on knee kinematics and warrant consideration in addition to the CPAK system.

Methods

We examined 335 adult patients with osteoarthritis receiving total knee arthroplasty. We measured the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and posterior tibial slope angle (PTS). Knees were categorized into CPAK classes and subdivided into types 'A' (PTS 8°) or 'B' (PTS >8°). We recorded pre-and-post operative knee flexion, and extension/flexion gaps in all subjects.

Results

CPAK classes VII-IX were not seen. Classes I and II comprised a plurality of all knees. One-third of all knees were type B. CPAK classes III, IV, and VI had greater type B proportions, but this was not statistically significant. Type B knees had greater flexion both pre-op (p < .001) and post-op (p = .043); type A knees had greater flexion improvement pre-to-post operatively (p = .045). Type A knees had greater medial and lateral flexion-extension gap change pre-operatively (p = .021) and (p = .027), respectively. Type B knees had greater medial-lateral gap imbalance preoperatively in both flexion and extension.

Discussion/conclusion

Our results suggest that there are important pre and post-operative differences in medial and lateral femorotibial gap balance between type A and B knees that require consideration for intra-operative balancing. Differences in knee flexion further solidify that PTS is an important variable that affects kinematics before and after TKA. We propose the addition of PTS types A and B to the existing CPAK classes. This is an easy and logical way to create a comprehensive classification system in both coronal and sagittal planes that captures further differences in knee kinematics.

Preoperative Joint Distraction Imaging and Planning Protocol for Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Current preoperative total knee arthroplasty (TKA) planning strategies are bone-referencing and do not consider the ligamentous profile of the knee. This study assessed the mean Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle of the planned Distracted Alignment (DA), an alignment output using a joint distraction radiology and planning protocol, which incorporates preoperative evaluation of ligament laxity.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 144 knees undergoing TKA was performed. Each patient received a preoperative computer tomograph scan, a weight-bearing antero-posterior knee radiograph, and distracted knee radiographs in extension and flexion. The imaging was used to develop a preoperative DA plan aiming for medio-lateral and extension-flexion space balance. The mean DA, weight-bearing, and arithmetic HKA angles were compared to each other, and to the HKA of a healthy nonarthritic population.

RESULTS

The mean weight-bearing, arithmetic, and planned DA HKA angles were 4.8° (interquartile range [IQR] 6.5°) varus, 0.4° (IQR 4.5°) varus, and 2.2° (IQR 4.0°) varus, respectively. This compares to a healthy adult HKA angle of 1.3° varus. The difference between the planned DA and arithmetic HKA angles was greater than 3° for 36% of the patients in the study population.

CONCLUSIONS

The planned DA HKA angle was fundamentally different from the arithmetic HKA angle, but comparable to a healthy population. Considering both hard and soft tissue information of the knee, we believe the planned DA resulting from the joint distraction radiology protocol allows for optimized preoperative surgical planning in TKA. This protocol has been shown to be clinically viable.

No differences in long-term clinical outcomes and survival rate of navigation-assisted versus conventional primary mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: A minimum 10-year follow-up

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes and survival rates between navigation-assisted (NAV) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and conventional (CON) TKA using a mobile-bearing insert.

METHODS

From May 2008 to December 2009, 45 and 63 mobile-bearing TKA patients were enroled in the CON- and NAV-TKA groups with 146.8 months follow-up, respectively. Clinical outcomes (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index and Knee Society Scores), radiographic outcomes (hip-knee-ankle [HKA], lateral distal femoral, medial proximal tibial, γ, and δ angles), and survivorship were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

The number of HKA angle outliers (more than 3 degrees or less than -3 degree) was significantly lower in the NAV-TKA group (24.4% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.036) than in the CON-TKA group. However, long-term clinical outcomes were similar between both groups. The cumulative survival rate (best-case scenario) was 98.3% in the CON-TKA group and 97.5% in the NAV-TKA group, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.883).

CONCLUSION

Long-term clinical outcomes and survival rates were similar between the two groups despite fewer outliers of postoperative lower-limb alignment in the NAV-TKA group. Excellent survival rates were observed in both groups using mobile-bearing inserts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Correction of Sagittal Deformity with Bone Resection and Soft Tissue Releases

Fixed flexion deformities (FFDs) present several unique challenges in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and require careful consideration to achieve optimal outcomes. FFD alters normal knee biomechanics and increases energy expenditure. They may be attributed to both bony deformities and fibrosed soft tissues, which must be addressed in stepwise fashion at the time of surgery. A literature review was conducted utilizing keywords "fixed flexion deformity TKA." This review article aims to discuss the anatomy and pathology, preoperative evaluation, classification system, surgical techniques for addressing deformity, implant selection considerations, postoperative protocols, clinical outcomes, and potential complications associated with correcting FFD. By comprehensively addressing these aspects, surgeons can optimize surgical planning and improve outcomes in patients with FFD undergoing TKA.

Effectiveness of Kinematic Alignment-Total Knee Arthroplasty in Treating Preoperative Varus and Valgus Deformities in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is surgically treated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Traditionally, TKA has been performed using a mechanical alignment (MA) philosophy. However, due to significant patient dissatisfaction with surgical outcomes, an alternate alignment approach, kinematic alignment (KA), has gained popularity. KA-TKAs have improved functional patient outcomes by restoring the patient's native joint line orientation and minimizing soft tissue releases compared to neutral alignment in MA-TKAs. This review explores the postoperative effectiveness of utilizing KA-TKA to treat knee OA in patients with preoperative varus and valgus deformities. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed and Biomed Central databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The literature search focused on studies analyzing the postoperative TKA outcomes in knee OA patients with preoperative varus or valgus deformities whose surgeries followed a KA philosophy and those comparing KA-TKA with MA-TKA. The available clinical evidence indicates that KA-TKA can be a viable treatment option for individuals with knee OA. The alignment of phenotypes has little clinical significance concerning functional outcomes and implant survival rates following KA-TKA. Furthermore, surgery outcomes in patients with preoperative deformities who underwent KA-TKA were similar to those who underwent MA-TKA. KA-TKA produced significantly better functional outcomes than MA-TKA in certain aspects. However, studies with larger sample sizes and more extended follow-up periods that directly compare KA-TKA with MA-TKA in treating knee OA patients are needed to fully demonstrate the efficacy of each technique. Furthermore, further research into the effects of KA-TKA on implant survival rates will provide a better understanding of the benefits of this technique and ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes.

Unrestricted kinematic alignment corrects fixed flexion contracture in robotically aligned total knees without raising the joint line in extension

PURPOSE

Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty (MA TKA) typically addresses fixed flexion contractures (FFC) by raising the joint line during extension. However, in unrestricted Kinematically Aligned TKA (KA TKA) utilizing a caliper-based resection technique, the joint line is not raised. This study aims to determine the efficacy of KA TKA in restoring full extension in patients with FFC without increasing distal femoral resection, considering tibial bone resection and sagittal component positioning.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted by a single surgeon, involving patients who underwent primary robotically assisted cruciate retaining unrestricted KA TKA between June 1, 2021, and December 1, 2022. Complete intraoperative resection and alignment data were recorded, including the thickness of distal femoral and proximal tibial bone cuts. Patients with a preoperative FFC ≥ 5° (study group) were compared to those with FFC < 5° (control group). The impact of variations in tibial resection and sagittal component positioning was assessed by comparing the heights of medial and lateral resections, sagittal femoral component flexion, and tibial slope. Group comparisons were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 48 KA TKA procedures met the inclusion criteria, with 24 performed on women. The mean preoperative FFC in the study group was 11.2° (range: 5-25°), while the control group exhibited 1° (range: 0-4°) (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences observed between the study and control groups in terms of distal femoral resections, both medially (p = 0.14) and laterally (p = 0.23), as well as tibial resection heights, both medially (p = 0.66) and laterally (p = 0.74). The alignment of the femoral component flexion and tibial slope was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.31 and p = 0.54, respectively). All patients achieved within 5 degrees of full extension at closure.

CONCLUSION

Robotic arm-assisted unrestricted KA TKA effectively restores full extension without raising the joint line during extension for patients with a preoperative fixed flexion contracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Functional alignment in total knee arthroplasty best achieves balanced gaps and minimal bone resections: an analysis comparing mechanical, kinematic and functional alignment strategies

PURPOSE

Key concepts in total knee arthroplasty include restoration of limb alignment and soft-tissue balance. Although differences in balance have been reported amongst mechanical alignment (MA), kinematic alignment (KA) and functional alignment (FA) techniques, it remains unclear whether there are differences in gap imbalance or resection thicknesses when comparing different constitutional alignment subgroups.

METHODS

MA (measured resection technique), KA (matched resections technique) and FA (technique based on the restricted KA boundaries) were compared in 116 consecutive patients undergoing 137 robotic-assisted cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties. The primary outcome was the proportion of balanced gaps (differential laxities ≤ 2 mm) for extension, flexion, medial and lateral gap measurements. Manual pre-resection laxity measurements were obtained for MA and KA and manual post-resection measurements were obtained for FA in 10° and in 90° of knee flexion. Secondary outcomes were resection depths and implant alignment. All outcomes were analysed per constitutional coronal alignment and joint line obliquity subgroups.

RESULTS

The proportions of balance in all four gap measurements were 54.7%, 66.4% and 96.5%, with MA, KA and FA, respectively. Across all constitutional alignment types, FA achieved the highest proportion of balance. MA resected the least amount of bone from the medial tibial plateau. KA had femoral components in most valgus and most internally rotated, tibial components in most varus and was the most bone-preserving for the posteromedial femoral condyle. FA had the most externally rotated femoral components and was most bone-preserving for the distal femoral resections.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that implant alignment to the mechanical axis or joint line anatomy (equal resections) alone does not guarantee a balanced total knee arthroplasty. FA resulted in the highest proportion of balanced knees across all analysed subgroups. Future research will consider whether one alignment philosophy leads to superior outcomes for different constitutional alignment subgroups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Effect of mediolateral gap difference on postoperative outcomes in navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty using an ultracongruent insert and the medial stabilising technique

PURPOSE

This study was aimed to compare the clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes between symmetric and asymmetric extension and mediolateral gap balance after navigation-assisted (NA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using ultracongruent (UC) insets and the medial stabilising technique (MST).

METHODS

In all, 363 knees of 275 patients who underwent mechanical alignment-target NA TKA with MST between January 2015 and December 2017 were analysed. Patients were divided into balanced (extension mediolateral gap difference ≤ 2 mm) and tight medial (difference ≥ 3 mm) groups. Pre- and postoperative clinical, functional (range of motion, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis [WOMAC] index, Knee Society Knee Score [KSKS], and Knee Society Function Score [KSFS]) and radiographic (hip-knee-ankle [HKA] angle, femoral condylar offset, extension angle [a minus indicates hyperextension], and joint line distance) outcomes were compared between the groups. Student's t- or Chi-squared test was used to compare the outcomes.

RESULTS

Among the 363 knees analysed, 279 (77%) were assigned to the balanced group and 84 (23%) to the tight medial group. The preoperative HKA angle was significantly greater in the tight medial group than in the balanced group (9.7° ± 4.1° vs 14.3° ± 4.7°, P < 0.001). The postoperative WOMAC index, KSKS, and KSFS were similar between the groups. The change in the joint line distance was not significantly different (1.5 ± 3.7 vs 2.0 ± 3.3; n.s).

CONCLUSION

The clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes, including joint line distance, were comparable between the tight medial and balanced group after mechanical alignment-targeted UC TKA with MST.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Current Concepts in Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

In an effort to increase satisfaction among total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients, emphasis has been placed on implant positioning and limb alignment. Traditionally, the aim for TKA has been to achieve a neutral mechanical alignment (MA) to maximize implant longevity. However, with the recent spike in interest in individualized alignment techniques and with the advent of new technologies, surgeons are slowly evolving away from classical MA.

METHODS

This review elucidates the differences in alignment techniques for TKA, describes the concept of knee phenotypes, summarizes comparative studies between MA and individualized alignment, and provides a simple way to incorporate the latter into surgeons' practice.

RESULTS

In order to manage patients by applying these strategies in day-to-day practice, a basic understanding of the aforementioned concepts is essential. Transition to an individualized alignment technique should be done gradually with caution in a stepwise approach.

CONCLUSION

Alignment and implant positioning are now at the heart of the debate and surgeons are investigating a more personalized approach to TKA.

Analysis of Short-Term Clinical and Functional Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty with Kinematic Alignment Technique

BACKGROUND

Surgery remains the best option for more advanced stages of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Kinematic alignment (KA) is an innovative surgical technique that aims to co-align the rotational axes of the femoral, tibial, and patella components with the three kinematic axes of the knee. This study aims to evaluate and analyze short-term clinical, psychological, and functional outcomes in patients undergoing total knee replacement with the KA technique.

METHODS

Twelve patients who underwent total knee replacement surgery with kinematic alignment from May 2022 until July 2022 were prospectively followed and interviewed. Before surgery, the day after surgery, and postoperative day 14, the following tests were evaluated: VAS, SF-12 PS, SF-12 MS, KSS, KSS-F, PHQ-9, and KOOS-PS.

RESULTS

The mean BMI value of 30.4 (±3.4) Kg/m², mean age of 71.8 (±7.2) years. All the scores on the various tests administered consistently showed statistically significant improvement, not only immediately after surgery but also comparing the first to the fourteenth postoperative day.

CONCLUSION

Kinematic alignment technique as a surgical treatment for KO allows the patient a fast postoperative recovery and good clinical, psychological, and functional results in a short time. Further studies are needed with a larger sample size, and prospective randomized studies are essential to compare these results with mechanical alignment.

Fixed Flexion Contracture Can Successfully Be Addressed with Exact Preservation of the Femoral Joint Line and Only Minimal Increase of Tibia Resection in the Concept of Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty

The aims of this study were to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing kinematic alignment (KA) robot-assisted (RA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with and without preoperative fixed flexion contracture (FFC) and address whether additional resection of the proximal tibia is required to address FFC. A retrospective review from 147 consecutive patients who received an RA-TKA with KA and a minimum one-year follow-up was performed. Preop and postop clinical and surgical data were collected. Groups were set based on preoperative extension deficits: group 1 (0-4°) (n = 64), group 2 (5-10°) (n = 64) and group 3 (>11°) (n = 27). There were no differences in patient demographics among the three groups. In group 3, the mean tibia resection was 0.85 mm thicker than group 1 (p < 0.05) and the preoperative extension deficit was improved from -17.22° (SD 3.49) preop to -2.41° (SD 4.47) postop (p < 0.05). Our results demonstrate that FFC can successfully be addressed in the RA-TKA with KA and rKA and that no additional femoral bone resection is needed to achieve full extension in patients with preoperative FFC when compared with patients without FFC. Only a slight increase in the amount of tibial resection was observed, but this was less than one millimetre.

Neutral Mechanical Alignment Alters the Native Distal Femoral Joint Line: A Virtual Three-Dimensional Planning Total Knee Arthroplasty Study

BACKGROUND

Alternative alignment concepts have garnered great interest in an effort to improve patient satisfaction following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study is to determine variation or deviation from an individual's native joint line in primary TKA using neutral mechanical versus a restricted kinematic technique.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved prospective cohort study was performed evaluating the effect of neutral mechanical alignment (nMA) versus a restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) on the native joint line in 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA. Using preoperative computed tomography and intraoperative 3-dimensional software, 2 virtual preoperative plans were created: nMA and rKA. Templated bone resections were recorded. Change in joint line was calculated using known implant planar thickness and planned bone resection.

RESULTS

nMA yielded significantly greater deviation from the patient's native joint line along the lateral compartment of the knee (lateral distal femoral condyle, lateral posterior femoral condyle, lateral tibial resection). With nMA, the lateral distal femoral joint line was distalized by a mean 4.3 versus 2.6 mm using rKA technique (P < .001). In rKA, >60% of knees had <3 mm of deviation from the native lateral posterior femoral offset, whereas in nMA, >95% of knees had ≥3 mm change in the lateral posterior femoral condylar offset.

CONCLUSION

nMA-TKA resulted in statistically larger joint line deviations compared to rKA-TKA, most notably along the lateral distal femoral condyle joint line. Further analysis is needed to determine the clinical consequences of joint line deviation from the native anatomy using nMA as the target for primary TKA.

How does the use of quantified gap-balancing affect component positioning and limb alignment in robotic total knee arthroplasty using functional alignment philosophy? A comparison of two robotic platforms

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the effect of an image-based (MAKO) system using a gap-balancing technique with an imageless (OMNIbot) robotic tool utilising a femur-first measured resection technique.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients undergoing primary TKA with a functional alignment philosophy performed by a single surgeon using either the MAKO or OMNIbot robotic systems. In all cases, the surgeon's goal was to create a balanced knee and correct sagittal deformity (eliminate any fixed flexion deformity). Intra-operative data and patient-reported outcomes (PROMS) were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 207 MAKO TKA and 298 OMNIbot TKAs were analysed. MAKO TKA patients were younger (67 vs 69, p=0.002) than OMNIbot patients. There were no other demographic or pre-operative alignment differences. Regarding implant positioning, in MAKO TKAs the femoral component was more externally rotated in relation to the posterior condylar axis (2.3° vs 0.1°, p<0.001), had less valgus femoral cuts (1.6° vs 2.7° valgus, p<0.001) and more varus tibial cuts (2.4° vs 1.9° varus, p<0.001), and had more bone resected compared to OMNIbot TKAs. OMNIbot cases were more likely to require tibial re-cuts than MAKO (15% vs 2%, p<0.001). There were no differences in femur recut rates, soft tissue releases, or rate of achieving target coronal and sagittal leg alignment between robotic systems. A subgroup analysis of 100 MAKO and 100 OMNIbot propensity-matched TKAs with 12-month follow-up showed no significant difference in OKS (42 vs 43, p=0.7) or OKS PASS scores (83% vs 91%, p=0.1). MAKO TKAs reported significantly better symptoms according to their KOOS symptoms score than patients that had OMNIbot TKAs (87 vs 82, p=0.02) with a higher proportion of KOOS PASS rates, at a slightly longer follow-up time (20 months vs 14 months, p<0.001). There were no other differences in PROMS.

CONCLUSION

A gap-balanced technique with an image-based robotic system (MAKO) results in different implant positioning and bone resection and reduces tibial recuts compared to a femur-first measured resection technique with an imageless robotic system (OMNIbot). Both systems achieve equal coronal and sagittal deformity correction and good patient outcomes at short-term follow-ups irrespective of these differences.

Variation in knee balance as a function of hip-knee-ankle angle and joint line obliquity in robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To describe the mediolateral (ML) gap balance in pre-resection arthritic knees undergoing robot-assisted (RA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) within the nine phenotypes of the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification.

METHODS

A total of 1124 RA TKA cases were retrospectively reviewed. ML balance was calculated using a digital ligament tensioning device following tibial resection and prior to any femoral resection throughout flexion (10°, 40°, and 90°). Lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were landmarked intra-operatively and adjusted for wear based on hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA). Knees were then subdivided into CPAK categories based on the arithmetic HKA (aHKA) and joint line obliquity (JLO). Differences in balance between CPAK phenotypes were compared.

RESULTS

For aHKA, a greater medial gap was observed in varus compared to neutral or valgus knees at 10° (5.2 ± 3.0 mm vs 3.3 ± 3.2 mm vs - 0.4 ± 5.0 mm respectively; p < 0.0001). A similar trend was observed for JLO in distal apex compared to neutral and proximal apex knees at 10° (3.4 ± 3.6 vs 1.1 ± 5.0 vs - 2.4 ± 6.3 respectively; p < 0.0001). The greatest ML balance differences were found when combining JLO and aHKA at 10° (type I vs type VI: ∆6.6 mm; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

There is a high degree of variability in arthritic ML balance within and between each CPAK phenotype. A single alignment philosophy based on bony landmarks alone may not be sufficient to balance all knees. Utilisation of robotics and digital ligament tensioning devices serves as important adjuncts to characterize the patient-specific soft tissue profile.

An early clinical comparative study on total knee arthroplasty with kinematic alignment using specific instruments versus mechanical alignment in varus knees

Background

The kinematic alignment technique, as one of the alignment options for total knee arthroplasty, has attracted increasing attention from orthopedic surgeons and has been increasingly performed in the most populous countries in the world. The purpose of this study is to explore and compare the early clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty with KA using specific instruments vs. mechanical alignment in our nation.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis with varus deformity. Depending on the alignment method, patients were divided into a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA) group and a mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (MA-TKA) group. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle before and after surgery, the knee joint clinical score (KS-C), the knee joint functional score (KS-F) and the forgotten joint score (FJS) at 3 months and 2 years after surgery were recorded and statistically analyzed.

Results

A total of 126 patients were enrolled, including 65 in the KA-TKA group and 61 in the MA-TKA group. The mean follow-up period was 30.8 months. The postoperative HKA angle was not significantly different at the 2-year follow-up between the two groups (P > 0.05). The KS-C, KS-F and FJS scores in the KA-TKA group were higher than those in the MA-TKA group at 3 months after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At the 2-year follow-up, the KS-C, KS-F and FJS scores in the KA-TKA group were higher than those in the MA-TKA group, and the difference in the KS-C and FJS scores was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Patients who underwent KA-TKA had a postoperative lower limb alignment similar to that of those who underwent MA-TKA. The clinical outcomes of KA-TKA were superior to those of MA-TKA in terms of clinical performance, knee function and subjective sensation up to 2 years after surgery.

The impact of postoperative inclination of the joint line on clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty using a prosthesis with anatomical geometry

The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of postoperative inclination of the joint line on clinical results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a prosthesis with anatomical geometry. This study included 145 primary cruciate-retaining type of knee prosthesis with anatomical geometry. Three years postoperatively, clinical outcomes including the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were recorded. Limb alignment was evaluated by the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) axis and inclination of the joint line was assessed by the joint line orientation angle (JLOA). Knees were divided into two groups according to the HKA: in-range (- 3 to 3°) and outlier group (< - 3° or > 3°) or the JLOA: in-range (2-4°) and outlier group (< 2° or > 4°), and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Postoperative Knee Society Function Score (KS-FS) was significantly higher in the HKA in-range group than the outlier group (p = 0.01). The Knee Society Knee Score and all subscales of the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were comparable between the groups. A multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between age at operation and postoperative KS-FS > of 80 points. Neither HKA in-range nor JLOA in-range were associated with the higher knee function. In conclusion, TKA-postoperative inclination of the joint line was not relevant to the short-term PROs. Treatment strategies that attempt to make joint line inclination in order to improve postoperative PROs should be avoided, and alignment goals such as kinematic alignment should be considered carefully.

Restricted Inverse Kinematic Alignment Better Restores the Native Joint Line Orientation While Achieving Similar Balance, Laxity, and Arithmetic Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle to Gap Balancing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Both restricted inverse kinematic alignment (iKA) and gap balancing aim for a balanced total knee arthroplasty by adjusting femoral component position based on ligamentous gaps. However, iKA targets a native tibial joint line vs resecting perpendicular to the mechanical axis. This study compares how these 2 techniques impact the balance and laxity throughout flexion and joint line obliquity (JLO), arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), and the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK).

Methods

Two surgeons performed 75 robot-assisted iKA total knee arthroplasties. A digital joint tensioner collected laxity data throughout flexion before femoral resection. The femoral component position was determined using predictive gap-planning to optimize the balance throughout flexion. Planned gap balancing (pGB) simulations were performed for each case using neutral tibial resections. Mediolateral balance, laxity, and CPAK were compared among pGB, planned iKA (piKA), and final iKA.

Results

Both piKA and pGB had similar mediolateral balance and laxity, with mean differences <0.4 mm. piKA had a lower mean absolute difference from native JLO than pGB (3 ± 2° vs 7 ± 4°, P < .001). aHKA was similar (P > .05) between pGB and piKA. piKA recreated a more native CPAK distribution, with types I-V being the most common ones, while most pGB knees were of type V, VII, and III. Final iKA and piKA had similar mediolateral balance and laxity, with a root-mean-square error <1.4 mm.

Conclusions

Although balance, laxity, and aHKA were similar between piKA and pGB, piKA better restored native JLO and CPAK phenotypes. The neutral tibial resection moved most pGB knees into types V, VII, and III. Surgeons should appreciate how the alignment strategy affects knee phenotypes.

Kinematic alignment results in clinically similar outcomes to mechanical alignment: Systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

It is unclear whether a difference in functional outcome exists between kinematically aligned (KA) and mechanically aligned (MA) knee replacements. The aim of this study is to perform a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the available level I-IV evidence.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies comparing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), gait analysis and complications in TKA with KA and MA was performed. Quality assessment was performed for each study using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools.

RESULTS

Twelve randomised controlled trials and fourteen observational studies published between 2014 and 2022 were included in the final analysis. Meta-analysis revealed KA to have significantly better Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (p = 0.02), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) (p = 0.006), Knee Society Score (KSS) Objective Knee (p = 0.03) and KSS Functional Activity (p = 0.008) scores. However, these improvements did not exceed the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) values reported in the literature. Subgroup analysis showed robotic assisted KA-TKA to have a clinically superior FJS (p = 0.0002) and trend towards KSS Objective Knee score (p = 0.10), compared to PSI. Gait and plantar pressure distribution of KA cohorts more closely represented healthy cohorts, and KA showed a weak association of a decreased knee adduction moment (KAM) compared to MA. Differences in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), range of motion and complications were not significant between groups.

CONCLUSION

Although KA results in several improved functional outcomes, these do not reach clinical significance. Further standardised large-scale randomised studies are required to improve the quality of evidence. As it stands, it is difficult to recommend one philosophy over the other.

A standardized technique for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

OBJECTIVES

We developed a new standardized procedure for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks of surgery in patients with osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

This retrospective study recruited patients who underwent lateral UKA at our hospital between January 2014 and January 2016. Demographic characteristics and preoperative and postoperative American Knee Society (AKS) clinical scores (including pain, clinical, and knee mobility scores) were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 158 patients (35 male and 123 female) who underwent 160 lateral UKAs were analyzed. Their AKS clinical scores (0-100 points) improved from 53.1 ± 4.1 (range 45-62) preoperatively to 97.0 ± 1.7 (range 92-99) (p < 0.001) postoperatively with additional improvements of 9.1 ± 1.8 (range 3-14) to 47.3 ± 1.5 (range 45-49) (p < 0.001) for pain, 49.7 ± 9.7 (range 35-70) to 97.1 ± 4.1 (range 90-100) (p < 0.001) for function, and 105.0 ± 4.4° (equivalent to ∼100-115°) to 125.5 ± 5.3° (∼110-135°) (p < 0.001) for a range of motion (ROM). No patients required reoperations or revisions. Two patients were readmitted within 60 days due to severe knee swelling.

CONCLUSION

The lateral UKA protocol was reproducible and the patients had a good postoperative outcomes. Yet, large-scale, multi-center, prospective studies are needed to further confirm our findings.

Effects of Severe Varus Deformity on Soft Tissue Balancing in Total Knee Arthroplasty

This study aimed to establish the effect of severe varus deformity on soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which is not yet well established. We retrospectively enrolled 205 patients (270 knees) who underwent primary TKA using the measured resection technique. Four intraoperatively measured TKA gaps and gap differences were compared between the severe varus deformity group (Hip-knee-ankle [HKA] varus angle ≥ 10°) and the mild varus deformity group (HKA varus angle < 10°). Pearson’s correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were used to investigate the factors affecting flexion and extension gap differences (FGD and EGD). A receiver operating characteristic curve was applied to assess the cut-off value of the HKA varus angle to discriminate the rectangular gap. The FGD (1.42 ± 1.35 mm vs. 1.05 ± 1.16 mm, p = 0.019) and the EGD (1.45 ± 1.32 mm vs. 0.97 ± 1.53 mm, p = 0.006) were significantly larger in severe varus deformity group than in mild varus deformity group. The HKA varus angle was positively correlated with both FGD (r = 0.264, p < 0.001) and EGD (r = 0.319, p < 0.001) and was an influencing factor for FGD (β = 0.232, p = 0.040) and EGD (β = 0.229, p = 0.037). A preoperative HKA angle of 12.4° was selected as the cutoff value to discriminate between rectangular and trapezoidal gaps. Thus, the severity of varus deformity (HKA varus angle) was found to be a significant factor affecting the mediolateral gap difference in TKA. When performing TKA in a knee with an HKA varus angle ≥ 12.4°, a trapezoidal gap is more likely to be expected. Level of evidence III, case−control study.

Restricted kinematic alignment achieves similar relative lateral laxity and greater joint line obliquity compared to gap balancing TKA

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare ligament balance and laxity profiles achieved throughout flexion in restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) and gap balancing (GB). rKA and GB both aim to improve soft tissue balance and reduce ligament releases in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

One surgeon performed 68 rKA, another performed 73 GB TKAs using the same CR implant and robotic system. rKA limited femoral valgus and tibial varus to 6°, with tibial recuts performed to achieve balance. GB limited tibial varus and femoral valgus to 2°, with femoral resections adjusted to achieve mediolateral balance throughout flexion using predictive-gap planning software. Final joint laxity was measured using a robotic ligament tensioner. Statistical analyses were performed to compare differences in mediolateral balance and joint laxity throughout flexion. Further analyses compared alignment, joint line elevation and orientation (JLO), and frequency of ligament releases and bone recuts.

RESULTS

Both techniques reported greater lateral laxity throughout flexion, with GB reporting improved mediolateral balance from 10° to 45° flexion. GB resected 1.7 mm more distal femur (p ≤ 0.001) and had greater overall laxity than rKA throughout flexion (p ≤ 0.01). rKA increased JLO by 2.5° and 3° on the femur and tibia (p ≤ 0.001). Pre-operative and post-operative coronal alignment were similar across both techniques. rKA had a higher tibial recut rate: 26.5% vs 1.4%, p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

rKA and GB both report lateral laxity but with different JLO and elevation. Use of a predictive-gap GB workflow resulted in greater mediolateral gap symmetry with fewer recuts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Kinematic alignment fails to achieve balancing in 50% of varus knees and resects more bone compared to functional alignment

PURPOSE

Evidence is emerging that tibio-femoral compartmental balancing is related to clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to assess if kinematic alignment (KA) delivered a balanced knee in flexion and extension after TKA on varus deformity, compared to functional alignment (FA).

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective cohort study assessed 110 consecutive TKAs performed with an image-based robotic system for pre-operative varus deformity. The ligament balancing in the medial and lateral femorotibial compartments was assessed intra-operatively with a robotic system to evaluate if a KA plan would deliver a balanced knee. Balance was considered achieved if tibio-femoral compartments (medial/lateral) were equal to or less than 1.5 mm, or if the estimated final gap position more than 2 mm from the global implant thickness (17 mm). Implant positioning was modified within limits previously defined for a FA philosophy to achieve balancing. Resection thickness and implant positioning were compared with the KA plan and after the FA adjustments; and also, between the patients with a final balanced knee in extension and at 90° of flexion.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were eligible for final analysis. Mean age was 67.3 ± 8.2 years, average BMI was 29.1 ± 5.2 kg/m², mean pre-operative coronal alignment was 174.0° ± 3.3° and sagittal alignment 3.4° ± 5.9°. Mean post-operative coronal alignment was 177.7° ± 1.0° and sagittal alignment 0.8° ± 1.9°. A KA plan delivered medial-lateral tibio-femoral compartment balancing in 67 cases (65.7%) for the extension gap and in 50 cases (49.1%) for the flexion gap. All measured bone resection depths were significantly less for FA compared to KA. To achieve balancing targets, final femoral component position was more externally rotated relative to the posterior condylar axis, (0.5° with KA compared to 1.7° with FA (p < 0.0001), and the tibia in more varus (3.0° KA vs. 3.5° FA p = 0.0024). Only one soft tissue release was required.

CONCLUSION

KA failed to deliver a balanced TKA in more than 50% of cases, especially regarding the flexion gap. Consideration of soft tissue laxity led to significantly less bone resection, with more externally rotated femoral component and more varus tibial component.

The importance of joint line obliquity: a radiological analysis of restricted boundaries in normal knee phenotypes to inform surgical decision making in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to restore native soft tissue laxities while limiting alignment extremes that risk prosthetic failure. However, there is no consensus where restricted boundaries (RB) should be set. This study aims to determine the proportion of limbs in which constitutional alignment and joint line obliquity (JLO) would be restored with various RB scenarios, to inform decision making in rKA TKA.

METHODS

The mechanical hip-knee-ankle (mHKA) angle, arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) angle, lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured on radiographs of 500 normal knees. Incrementally wider RBs were then applied. The proportion of limbs within each increment was determined when RBs were applied only to HKA, or to HKA, LDFA and MPTA together. In addition, the proportion of limbs within published adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA) and rKA protocols were determined, as well as those within one, two and three standard deviations of the means for HKA, LDFA and MPTA.

RESULTS

When restrictions to mHKA alone were applied, 74.0% and 97.8% of knees were captured with boundaries of ± 3° and ± 6° respectively. However, when the same boundaries to HKA were also applied to MPTA and LDFA, 36.2% and 91.0% of knees were captured respectively, highlighting the limiting effect that JLO has on restoration of normal knee phenotypes. When comparing previously published boundaries, aMA of 0° ± 3° captured 36.2%; rKA of 0° ± 3 for HKA and 85° to 95° for LDFA/MPTA captured 67.8%; rKA of - 5° to 4° HKA and 86°-93° for LDFA/MPTA captured 63%; and rKA of - 6° to + 3° for HKA and 84°-93° for LDFA/MPTA captured 85.4%.

CONCLUSION

The greatest proportions of normal knee phenotypes were captured with boundaries that were centred around population means for HKA and JLO. Further, these findings demonstrate that restricting the JLO has a significant limiting influence on restoration of normal knee phenotypes beyond that of restricting HKA alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Mechanical alignment for primary TKA may change both knee phenotype and joint line obliquity without influencing clinical outcomes: a study comparing restored and unrestored joint line obliquity

PURPOSE

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), knee phenotypes including joint line obliquity are of interest regarding surgical realignment strategies. The hypothesis of this study is that better clinical results, including decreased postoperative knee pain, will be observed for patients with a restored knee phenotype.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on prospective data, including 1078 primary osteoarthritic knees in 936 patients. The male:female ratio was 780:298, mean age at surgery was 71.3 years ± 8.0. International Knee Society Scores and standardized long-leg radiographs (LLR) were collected preoperatively and at 2 years follow-up after TKA. Patients were categorized using the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification including the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) measured on LLR by a single observer, allowing knee phenotypes to be categorized considering the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) angle (MPTA-LDFA) as measure of constitutional alignment, and joint line obliquity (JLO) (MPTA + LDFA). Clinical results were compared between patients with surgically restored preoperative constitutional knee phenotype to patients without restored constitutional knee phenotypes. Descriptive data analysis such as means, standard deviations and ranges were performed. T tests for independent samples were performed to compare group differences. Comparisons of categorical data were performed using the χ² test. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A third of patients (33.4%) had constitutional knee varus with apex distal JLO. 63.5% of patients had preoperative apex distal JLO. Postoperatively, 57.8% of patients had a neutral HKA (- 2° to 2°) and a neutral JLO (- 3° and 3°), with only 18% of patients with restored constitutional knee phenotype. Of these patients, statistically less postoperative pain was observed in patients where apex distal JLO was restored compared to non-restored apex distal JLO (pain score 46.7 vs. 44.6; p = 0.02) without clinical relevance. Other categories of restored JLO or arithmetic HKA angle were not associated with improved outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that performing mechanical alignment for primary TKA resulted in most cases in a change of the preoperative knee phenotype. These results emphasize the relevance of considering joint line obliquity to better understand preoperative knee deformity and better restore knee phenotypes with a more personalized realignment strategy to potentially improve TKA postoperative results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Surgeon Dominated Design Can Improve the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Instruments in Kinematically Aligned TKA

Precise bone resection is mandatory for kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA). This study is to investigate whether surgeon-dominated design can alter the accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in KA-TKA compared with the engineer design. A total of 24 patients (24 knees) who underwent KA-TKA in our institution were assigned to an engineer design group (10 knees) and surgeon design group (14 knees) chronologically. A novel portable medical-engineer interactive application can greatly enhance the surgeon’s participation in PSI design. The bone resection discrepancies were used to evaluate the accuracy of PSI in bone resection. The overall discrepancy of bone resection was reduced by surgeon-designed PSI compared to engineer-designed PSI by 0.33 mm. Surgeon-designed PSI seems to reduce the outliers in terms of relative discrepancies in bone resection as well, but it does not reach statistical significance. Moreover, surgeon-designed PSI could significantly improve the accuracy of PSI in the restoration of the joint line in terms of medial proximal tibial angle and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle. This study indicates that the dominance of surgeons in both PSI design and subsequent surgical operation should be emphasized in efforts to improve the accuracy of PSI.

Approximately 80% of Japanese osteoarthritic patients fall out of the safety range in restricted kinematically-aligned total knee arthroplasty in an analysis of preoperative long-leg radiograms

BACKGROUND

Restricted kinematically-aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA) is a reasonable modification to avoid the alignment outlier that may cause implant failure. However, despite a noted high incidence of constitutional varus in Japanese individuals, there has been no investigation into how many knees require the restriction in restricted KA-TKA (RKA-TKA) among Japanese patients. Therefore, we conducted a study using preoperative long-leg radiograms.

METHODS

We studied long-leg radiographs of 228 knees in 114 consecutive patients. The numbers of knees within the safety range and their corrective osteotomy angle in the restriction algorithms advocated by Almaawi et al. (2017) and MacDessi et al. (2020) were evaluated.

RESULTS

According to the algorithms used by Almaawi et al. and MacDessi et al., out of 228 knees, 46 (20%) and 39 (17%) fell within the safety range, respectively. The mean correction angles of the hip-knee-ankle angle, lateral distal femoral angle and medial proximal tibial angle were 2.8 ± 3.4°, 0.4 ± 1.4° and 2.4 ± 2.8° in the algorithm used by Almaawi et al., while they were -4.9 ± 4.7°, 1.1 ± 2.5° and -6.0 ± 3.4° in the algorithm used by MacDessi et al. Most of the knees needed to be restricted in order to perform RKA-TKA, regardless of the algorithm used.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a preoperative analysis of long-leg radiograms in a Japanese population, most knees fall out of the safety range in RKA-TKA. Surgeons must consider whether to allow component outlier or to perform corrective osteotomy that likely requires soft tissue release.

[Effectiveness analysis of lateral condyle sliding osteotomy in total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of lateral femoral bowing deformity]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of lateral condyle sliding osteotomy (LCSO) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the treatment of lateral femoral bowing deformity.

METHODS

The clinical data of 17 patients with lateral femoral bowing deformity treated by LCSO during TKA between July 2018 and July 2020 was retrospectively analysed. There were 3 males and 14 females, with an average of 63.2 years (range, 58-68 years). The etiology of lateral femoral bowing deformity included 12 cases of femoral developmental deformity and 5 cases of femoral fracture malunion. Kellgren-Lawrence classification of knee osteoarthritis was 4 cases of grade Ⅲ and 13 cases of grade Ⅳ. The preoperative hip-knee shaft was 9.5°-12.5° (mean, 10.94°). The disease duration was 3-25 years (mean, 15.1 years). The mechanical lateral distal femur angle (mLDFA), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), and mechanical axis deviation (MAD) of the distal femur were measured before operation and at last follow-up to evaluate the correction of extra-articular deformities in the joints and the recovery of mechanical force lines of the lower extremities. The knee society score (KSS) knee score and function score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, knee joint range of motion (ROM) were used to evaluate effectiveness. The knee varus/valgus stress test and osteotomy healing by X-ray films were performed to evaluate the joint stability and the safety of LCSO.

RESULTS

All incisions of the patients healed by first intention after operation, and there was no early postoperative complication such as infection of the incision and deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities. All 17 patients were followed up 12-36 months, with an average of 23.9 months. The osteotomy slices all achieved bony healing, and the healing time was 2-5 months, with an average of 3.1 months. After operation, the knee varus/valgus stress tests were negative, and there was no relaxation and rupture of the lateral collateral ligament, instability of the knee joint, loosening, revision and infection of the prosthesis occurred. At last follow-up, mLDFA, HKA, MAD, knee ROM, VAS score, KSS knee score and function score significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

LCSO is effective and safe in TKA with lateral femoral bowing deformity. Extra-articular deformities are corrected intra-articularly. The mechanical force line and joint balance of the lower extremities can be restored simultaneously in an operation.

Variable rotation of the femur does not affect outcome with patient specific alignment navigated balanced TKA

PURPOSE

Excessive internal and external rotation of the femoral component has been associated with poor outcome with a measured-resection neutral mechanical alignment TKA. This technique assumes that every tibia is in 3° of varus so the femoral component is placed in 3° of external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis to enable a balanced flexion gap. This is not the case as there is wide variability in the bony anatomy and soft tissue envelope of the knee so flexion imbalance may occur. A patient-specific alignment navigated balanced TKA technique was performed whereby the tibia is cut anatomically up to 3° of varus, then a ligament tensor is used to determine the optimal femoral component position for a balanced TKA. This results in variable femoral rotation. The hypothesis is that matching the femoral component rotation to the patient's anatomic tibial cut and soft tissue envelope will not affect clinical outcome METHODS: In a single surgeon series 287 consecutive varus aligned TKA's were performed using this technique with an Attune cruciate retaining fixed bearing TKA with an anatomic patella resurfacing. The angle between the posterior femoral cuts and the posterior condylar axis was collected using Brainlab software. Functional scores were collected prospectively preoperatively and at two years. The variable femoral component rotation was correlated with and compared with the functional outcome scores.

RESULTS

The femoral rotation varied from 7° of internal rotation to 8°of external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis. The mean rotation was 1.1° of external rotation. There was no significant difference in the Oxford score, WOMAC score, Forgotten Knee Score, KOOS Joint Replacement score or Patient Satisfaction in respect to the variable femoral rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis.

CONCLUSION

When a more anatomic-balanced TKA technique is used variable femoral rotation will not affect clinical outcome at two years LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II Prospective Cohort Study.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty with the OMNIBot platform: a review of the principles of use and outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Technology that enables the orthopaedic surgeon to deliver a surgical plan with precision and reproducibility continues to evolve. Robotic TKA represents the next phase of technological development in knee arthroplasty. Multiple propriety robotic platforms are now available for use in TKA, and one such system is the OMNIBotics platform. We conducted a review of this system, reporting its history and principles of use, published outcomes and our own personal experience performing OMNI robotic-assisted TKAs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines. Thirteen papers were included for the final review.

RESULTS

The OMNIBot is an accurate and consistent delivery tool in TKA surgery and compares favourably to instrumented, navigation-assisted and patient-specific cutting guides. The OMNIBot has been shown to be a reliable tool for delivering different alignment philosophies as well as planning and achieving tibio-femoral coronal balancing. The utility of the system is increased when the robot is used in conjunction with a soft-tissue tensioning device-the BalanceBot. Data regarding PROM's are limited, however results to date show reliable outcomes. Survival analysis of RATKA using the OMNIBot is limited to one study which reported 99.26% survivorship at 3 years. We report our own outcomes using the OMNIBot, having performed 766 TKA's using the OMNIBot, since 2014 with 99.48% survivorship at 6 year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The OMNIBot platform is an imageless, passive robotic system available since 2007, with over 30,000 TKA's being performed with its assistance. It has a small physical footprint, is relatively inexpensive and time efficient. Our review demonstrates a high level of precision of the surgical planning, with a modestly improved accuracy compared to conventional and navigation technology. Published outcomes are limited, however demonstrate good short-term PROM's and survivorship data that compare favourably to other robotic TKA cohorts.

Restoration of Joint Inclination in Total Knee Arthroplasty Offers Little Improvement in Joint Kinematics in Neutrally Aligned Extremities

Kinematically aligned total knee replacements have been shown to better restore physiological kinematics than mechanical alignment and also offer good postoperative satisfaction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the extent to which an inclined joint line in a kinematically aligned knee can alter the postoperative kinematics. A multi-body dynamic simulation was used to identify kinematic changes in the joint. To accurately compare mechanical alignment, kinematic alignment and a natural knee, a “standard” patient with neutral alignment of the lower extremities was selected for modeling from a joint database. The arthroplasty models in this study were implanted with a single conventional cruciate-retaining prosthesis. Each model was subjected to a flexion movement and the anteroposterior translation of the femoral condyles was collected for kinematic analysis. The results showed that the mechanical alignment model underwent typical paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral condyles. Incorporating an inclined joint line in the model did not prevent the paradoxical anterior translation, but a 3° varus joint line in the kinematic alignment model could reduce the peak value of this motion by about 1 mm. Moreover, the inclined joint line did not restore the motion curve back to within the range of the kinematic curve of the natural knee. The results of this study suggest that an inclined joint line, as in the kinematic alignment model, can slightly suppress paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral condyles, but cannot restore kinematic motions similar to the physiological knee. This finding implies that prostheses intended to be used for kinematic alignment should be designed to optimize knee kinematics with the intention of restoring a physiological motion curve.

The accelerometer-based navigation system demonstrated superior radiological outcomes in restoring mechanical alignment and component sagittal positioning in total knee arthroplasty

Background

This study aimed to determine whether the accelerometer-based navigation (ABN) could improve the accuracy of restoring mechanical axis (MA), component positioning, and clinical outcomes compared to conventional (CON) total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

A total of 301 consecutive patients (ABN: 27, CON: 274) were included. A 1:4 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the two groups according to preoperative demographic and clinical parameters. The postoperative MA, femoral coronal angle (FCA), femoral sagittal angle (FSA), tibial coronal angle (TCA) and tibial sagittal angle (TSA) were compared. Absolute deviations of aforementioned angles were calculated as the absolute value of difference between the exact and ideal value and defined as norms if within 3°, otherwise regarded as outliers. Additional clinical parameters, including the Knee Society knee and function scores (KSKS and KSFS) and range of motion (ROM), were assessed at final follow-up (FU) (mean FU was 21.88 and 21.56 months respectively for ABN and CON group). A secondary subgroup analysis and comparison on clinical outcomes were conducted between norms and outliers in different radiological parameters.

Results

A total of 98 patients/102 knees were analyzed after the PSM (ABN: 21 patients/24 knees, CON: 77 patients/78 knees). In the ABN group, the mean MA, FCA and TSA were significantly improved (p = 0.019, 0.006, < 0.001, respectively). Proportions of TKAs within a ± 3°deviation were significantly improved in all the postoperative radiological variables except for TCA (p = 0.003, 0.021, 0.042, 0.013, respectively for MA, FCA, FSA, and TSA). The absolute deviations of FSA and TSA were also significantly lower in the ABN group (p = 0.020, 0.048, respectively). No significant differences were found in either mean value, absolute deviation or outlier ratio of TCA between two groups. On clinical outcomes, there were no significant differences between two groups, although KSKS, KSFS and ROM (p < 0.01, respectively) dramatically improved compared to baseline. The subgroup analysis also demonstrated no statistical difference on clinical outcomes between the outliers and norms in varied radiological parameters.

Conclusions

The ABN could improve the accuracy and precision of mechanical alignment and component positioning without significant improvement of clinical outcomes. Further high quality studies with long term FU are warranted to comprehensively evaluate the value of the ABN.

Linked kinematic knee balancing in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

The traditional approach of restoring a neutral mechanical axis to the lower extremity during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has long been favored due its consistency and reproducibility. The kinematic alignment approach, which accounts for the patient's natural knee alignment and is commonly a few degrees varus to the mechanical axis, has gained popularity in recent years as a technique which reestablishes a more anatomic alignment. Linked Anatomic Kinematic Arthroplasty (LAKA), an extension of the kinematic approach that employs computer-assisted surgical (CAS) navigation, can improve the accuracy and precision of kinematic measurements in unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. This article will describe the LAKA technique in UKA and review early clinical outcomes associated with this technique.

What you need to know about kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty

This lecture outlines the various alignment philosophies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is logical that our desire to improve clinical outcomes for TKA involves a more personalized and physiological implantation process that preserves each patient's anatomical features. We will take a deep dive into the kinematic alignment concept by describing its rationale, surgical steps and results. Kinematic implantation of TKA can be done reliably at a low cost and appears to achieve acceptable implant biomechanics. While its short-term clinical results are encouraging, it must be evaluated further. The thresholds for acceptable alignment (indications for restricted kinematic alignment) still need to be specified. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V; Expert opinion.

Effect of Coronal Alignment on 10-Year Survivorship of a Single Contemporary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Debate remains regarding the utility of mechanical axis alignment as a predictor of durability after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our study aimed to assess the effects of coronal alignment on implant durability, clinical outcomes, and radiographic results with a single fixed-bearing TKA design. All patients undergoing primary cemented TKA of a single design (Stryker Triathlon) from 2005–2007 with >10 years of follow-up and available pre-operative and post-operative hip–knee–ankle radiographs were included (n = 89). Radiographs were measured to determine coronal alignment and assessed for loosening. Mean preoperative mechanical axis alignment was −6° ± 6.7° (varus, range, −16°–23°), while mean post-operative alignment was −1° ± 2.7° (varus, range, −3°–15°). The aligned group was defined as knees with a post-operative mechanical axis of 0° ± 3° (n = 73) and the outlier group as those outside this range (n = 16). No patients underwent revision. Ten-year survivorship free from any reoperation was 99% and 100% in the aligned and outlier groups, respectively (p = 0.64). Knee Society scores improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.001) and did not differ at final follow-up (p = 0.15). No knees demonstrated radiographic evidence of loosening. Post-operative mechanical axis alignment within 3° of neutral was not associated with improved implant durability, clinical outcomes, or radiographic results at 10 years following primary TKA.

Patients undergoing staged bilateral knee arthroplasty are less aware of their kinematic aligned knee compared to their mechanical knee

OBJECTIVE

To compare knee joint awareness following kinematic alignment (KA) TKA in patients who had previously undergone mechanical alignment (MA) on their contralateral knee.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of all consecutive patients who underwent staged bilateral TKA, the first using MA technique and the second utilizing the KA technique, without patient specific instrumentations. Primary outcome was assessed by the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Differences between knees were also assessed by three predefined key questions. Secondary outcome were differences in knee alignment assessed by long standing x-rays.

RESULTS

Overall, 38 patients (76 knees) met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The mean time for follow up was significantly shorter (P < 0.01) in the KA knees (1.8 years, SD 0.3) compared to the MA knees (3.1 years, SD 0.8). Nonetheless, patients were significantly less aware of their KA knees compared to their MA knees; median FJS scores were 74.0 for the KA group (IQR¼ 54.5-92.0) and 67.0 for the MA group (IQR¼ 43.7-88.0) (p = 0.01). Overall, 31 patients (81.6%) preferred their KA knee over their MA knee 6 (15.8%) (p < 0.001). KA bone cuts resulted in net varus of the medial proximal tibia (86.9, SD 2.0) and valgus of the distal femur (86.6, SD 2.8). However, the overall alignment was similar (femorotibial angle 5.4 ± 2.3 vs. 4.7 ± 2.4, p = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent staged bilateral knee arthroplasty were less aware of the knee that was kinematically aligned compared to the knee that was mechanically aligned. Future studies should focus on the long-term survivorship of KA TKA.

High intra- and inter-observer reliability of planning implant size in MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) uses individually designed disposable guides to determine intraoperative bone cuts. The manufacturer provides the surgeon with proposed planning which can be modified and should be approved by the surgeon before the guides are produced. This study aims to assess the intra- and inter-observer reliability among preoperative planning by orthopaedic surgeons using PSI. The authors hypothesize a high intra- and inter-observer reliability in planning TKA using PSI.

METHODS

Four orthopaedic surgeons modified and approved 40 preoperative MRI-based PSI plannings three times. The surgeons were blinded to their own and each other's results. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was obtained for planned implant size, resection, and position of the implant.

RESULTS

Intra-observer reliability Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were excellent for femoral and tibial implant size with a range of 0.948-0.995 and 0.919-0.988, respectively. Inter-observer reliability for femoral and tibial implant size showed an ICC range of 0.953-0.982 and 0.839-0.951, respectively. Next to implant size, intra- and inter-observer reliability demonstrated good to an excellent agreement (ICC > 0.75) for 7 out of 12 remaining parameters and 6 out of 12 remaining parameters, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative planning of TKA implant size using MRI-based PSI showed excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability. Further research on the comparison of predicted implant size preoperatively to intraoperative results is needed.

Kinematic versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: no difference in frequency of arthroscopic lysis of adhesions for arthrofibrosis

Arthrofibrosis is a condition that can cause excessive scar tissue formation, leading to painful restriction of joint motion. Following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), significant arthrofibrosis can result in permanent deficits in range of motion (ROM) if not treated. Although arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (ALOA) reliably improves post-TKA ROM if performed in a timely fashion, it exposes patients to additional anesthesia, heightens the risk of infection, and increases overall medical expenses. Kinematically aligned TKA has emerged as an alternative method to mechanically aligned, basing bony cuts off of the patient's pre-arthritic anatomy while limiting need for soft tissue and ligamentous releases. This study aimed to determine whether there is a difference in the frequency of post-TKA arthrofibrosis requiring ALOA between kinematic and mechanically aligned TKA. Between 2012 and 2019, a retrospective analysis was conducted based on a single surgeon's experience. Two cohorts were made based on alignment technique. Postoperatively, patients were diagnosed with arthrofibrosis and indicated for ALOA if they had functional pain with < 90 degrees of terminal flexion at 6 weeks postoperatively despite aggressive physical therapy. Frequency of ALOA was recorded for each cohort and was regressed using independent samples t-test. The results showed no significant difference between the mechanical and kinematic cohorts for frequency of ALOA following TKA (13.2% vs. 7.3%; p = 0.2659). However, the kinematic cohort demonstrated significantly greater post-ALOA ROM compared to the mechanical group (129° vs. 113°; p = 0.0097). Future higher-powered, prospective studies are needed to clarify whether a significant difference in rates of MUA/ALOA exists between the two alignment techniques.

Clinical outcomes of kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Although mechanical alignment (MA) has traditionally been considered the gold standard, the optimal alignment strategy for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still debated.

Kinematic alignment (KA) aims to restore native alignment by respecting the three axes of rotation of the knee and thereby producing knee motion more akin to the native knee.

Designer surgeon case series and case control studies have demonstrated excellent subjective and objective clinical outcomes as well as survivorship for KA TKA with up to 10 years follow up, but these results have not been reproduced in high-quality randomized clinical trials.

Gait analyses have demonstrated differences in parameters such as knee adduction, extension and external rotation moments, the relevance of which needs further evaluation.

Objective improvements in soft tissue balance using KA have not been shown to result in improvements in patient-reported outcomes measures.

Technologies that permit accurate reproduction of implant positioning and objective measurement of soft tissue balance, such as robotic-assisted TKA and compartmental pressure sensors, may play an important role in improving our understanding of the optimum alignment strategy and implant position.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:486-497. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190093

Kinematic versus mechanical alignment for primary total knee arthroplasty with minimum 2 years follow-up: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine whether there are any clinical or radiological differences in mechanically aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) compared with kinematically aligned TKA.

METHODS

This study included retrospective cohort studies, prospective randomized controlled trials (PRCTs) and prospective cohort studies comparing clinical and radiological outcomes, and complications in TKA with kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA). All studies had a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

RESULTS

Five PRCTs published between 2014 and 2020 were included. These studies showed a low risk of bias and were of very high quality. We did not find a superiority of KA compared to MA technique for clinical and radiological outcomes, except in one study which showed a significant difference favoring KA between the two groups for all clinical scores.

CONCLUSION

We found that KA in TKA achieved clinical and radiological results similar to those of MA. The complication rate was not increased for KA TKAs. Studies with longer follow-up and larger cohorts are required to prove any benefit of KA technique over MA technique.