Residual varus alignment after total knee arthroplasty increases knee adduction moment without improving patient function: A propensity score-matched cohort study

Potential biomechanical risk factors on developing lead knee osteoarthritis in the golf swing

The load on the lead knee joint during a golf swing is greater than that observed during gait. However, current evidence regarding golf swing biomechanics for risks associated with knee osteoarthritis (OA) is limited. Therefore, this study investigated golf swing styles associated with knee adduction and abduction moments, which are considered to be crucial loading regions of the medial and lateral compartments of knee OA, respectively. Thirteen professional male golfers performed five shots using a 5-iron club, and their swings were recorded using a motion capture system with two force platforms for the feet. A regression analysis was performed to calculate the correlation coefficients between the peak knee adduction and abduction moments of the lead leg and varus/valgus angle, toe-out angle, stance width, weight transfer, and shoulder sway. Swinging with a narrower stance width at address (r =  - 0.62, p = 0.02) with more weight shift (r = 0.66, p = 0.014) and shoulder sway (r = 0.79, p = 0.001) towards the target during the downswing were associated with a higher peak knee adduction of the lead leg, whereas a greater valgus angle at address (r = 0.60, p = 0.03) was associated with a higher peak knee abduction of the lead leg. Based on these findings, we anticipate future research to support postural changes, particularly a wider stance width and restricted shoulder sway for golfers who are classified to be at high risk of developing medial compartment knee OA, as well as a lower valgus (tibial medial tilt) angle at address for those classified to be at high risk of developing lateral compartment knee OA.

No consistent association between patient-reported outcome measures and coronal alignment following total knee arthroplasty: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty is a common procedure for treating knee conditions; however, significant proportions of patients report dissatisfaction post-operatively. Recent data suggests accurate coronal alignment may not be essential for optimizing prosthesis functionality and survivorship. This narrative review utilized a systematic approach to analyse the literature comparing post-operative coronal alignment and PROMs following knee replacement.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE was utilized to identify publications that directly compare the relationship between coronal alignment and PROMs.

RESULTS

Thirty-one eligible publications were identified. Variability in both study design and findings were observed, with no studies being without risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

Given this variability and lack of consensus among the reported publications, current literature is ill-equipped to describe the exact nature of the relationship between coronal alignment and PROMs following TKA. Further research would ideally utilize both validated generic, and knee-specific PROMs, make use of pre-operative outcome data, and standardized follow-up to develop reliable assessments of coronal alignment and its impact upon both functionality and quality of life.

Effect of distance between the feet on knee joint line orientation after total knee arthroplasty in standing full-limb radiographs

PURPOSE

Although knee joint line orientation (KJLO) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been emphasized as an important factor that can affect postoperative knee kinematics, the effect of foot position on KJLO has not been fully understood. This study aimed to (1) identify the anatomical and positional factors that determine KJLO after TKA, and (2) determine the effect of foot position on KJLO after TKA. The hypothesis of this study was that the post-TKA KJLO would change depending on the distance between the feet, as well as the coronal implant positions.

METHODS

A total of 92 radiographs from 46 patients who underwent TKA were retrospectively reviewed. Two postoperative standing full-limb anteroposterior radiographs taken with the feet in different positions (with both feet in contact with each other or shoulder width apart) from each patient were evaluated. The correlation between KJLO after TKA and possible anatomical and positional factors, including leg length, lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), ankle joint line orientation (AJLO), mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA), and distance between the feet, were analyzed, and the KJLO equation was computed using multiple linear regression. KJLO was also compared among different combinations of valgus or varus alignment of the femoral and tibial components.

RESULTS

LDFA, MPTA, AJLO, and distance between the feet were identified as determinants of KJLO after TKA, and the distance between the feet was strongly correlated with KJLO. Based on the KJLO equation (KJLO [°] = 107.548 - 0.441 × LDFA [°] - 0.832 × MPTA [°] + 0.093 × AJLO [°] + 0.037 × ITD [mm]), KJLO changes by 3.7° per 100 mm of distance between the feet. The KJLO of patients with valgus femoral and varus tibial components was more parallel to the ground than those with other combinations.

CONCLUSION

KJLO after TKA was strongly affected by the distance between the feet when taking full-limb radiography, and the KJLO changed by 3.7° per 100 mm of distance between the feet. To assess the KJLO after TKA reproducibly, standardization of the distance between the feet is necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Mechanical alignment for primary TKA may change both knee phenotype and joint line obliquity without influencing clinical outcomes: a study comparing restored and unrestored joint line obliquity

PURPOSE

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), knee phenotypes including joint line obliquity are of interest regarding surgical realignment strategies. The hypothesis of this study is that better clinical results, including decreased postoperative knee pain, will be observed for patients with a restored knee phenotype.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on prospective data, including 1078 primary osteoarthritic knees in 936 patients. The male:female ratio was 780:298, mean age at surgery was 71.3 years ± 8.0. International Knee Society Scores and standardized long-leg radiographs (LLR) were collected preoperatively and at 2 years follow-up after TKA. Patients were categorized using the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification including the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) measured on LLR by a single observer, allowing knee phenotypes to be categorized considering the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) angle (MPTA-LDFA) as measure of constitutional alignment, and joint line obliquity (JLO) (MPTA + LDFA). Clinical results were compared between patients with surgically restored preoperative constitutional knee phenotype to patients without restored constitutional knee phenotypes. Descriptive data analysis such as means, standard deviations and ranges were performed. T tests for independent samples were performed to compare group differences. Comparisons of categorical data were performed using the χ² test. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A third of patients (33.4%) had constitutional knee varus with apex distal JLO. 63.5% of patients had preoperative apex distal JLO. Postoperatively, 57.8% of patients had a neutral HKA (- 2° to 2°) and a neutral JLO (- 3° and 3°), with only 18% of patients with restored constitutional knee phenotype. Of these patients, statistically less postoperative pain was observed in patients where apex distal JLO was restored compared to non-restored apex distal JLO (pain score 46.7 vs. 44.6; p = 0.02) without clinical relevance. Other categories of restored JLO or arithmetic HKA angle were not associated with improved outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that performing mechanical alignment for primary TKA resulted in most cases in a change of the preoperative knee phenotype. These results emphasize the relevance of considering joint line obliquity to better understand preoperative knee deformity and better restore knee phenotypes with a more personalized realignment strategy to potentially improve TKA postoperative results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Functional outcomes of residual varus alignment versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis: A preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses-compliant meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

One in five patients with mechanical alignment (MA) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was reportedly dissatisfied. As constitutional varus knees are common, restoring the patients' natural residual varus (RV) alignment is as an appealing alternative to neutral MA. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of RV alignment on the functional outcomes compared with those of MA in TKA for the knees with varus osteoarthritis.

METHODS

The MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases were comprehensively searched for papers comparing the effects of RV alignment and MA on the functional outcomes from the time of inception of the databases to July 2020. Studies comparing the functional outcomes in the knees subjected to TKA with RV alignment (case group) and MA (control group) were included. The Knee Society knee and functional scores (KSKS and KSFS, respectively), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford knee score (OKS), and forgotten joint score (FJS) were compared.

RESULTS

Seven studies were finally included; all studies showed a low risk of selection bias and provided detailed demographic data. The pooled mean difference in the KSKS (0.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.14 to 0.27; p = 0.55) and KSFS (0.08, 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.35; p = 0.56) between RV alignment and MA did not significantly differ. The pooled mean differences in the WOMAC (-0.25, 95% CI: -0.57 to 0.07; p = 0.12), OKS (0.06, 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.27; p = 0.56), and FJS (0.41, 95% CI: -0.18 to 1.00; p = 0.18) between the groups were not significant.

CONCLUSION

The beneficial effects of RV alignment on the functional outcomes are limited compared to those of MA in TKA for varus osteoarthritis to date. Currently, TKA with neutral MA should be considered as the gold standard.

Malposition of components and Femorotibial mechanical Axis changes on pressure distribution in Total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

To the best of our knowledge, no report has analyzed the postoperative results of poor prosthesis position, particularly when the femoral and tibial components are abnormally positioned relative to neutral lower limb alignment. We aimed to investigate pressure distribution in the knee at different lower limb alignments with diverse positions of femoral and tibial components.

METHODS

We established a three-dimensional model of the lower limb using computed tomography and simulated total knee arthroplasty. Tibial and femoral components were changed to 7°, 5°, and 3° of valgus and neutral and 3°, 5°, and 7° of varus positions in the coronal plane. Finite element analysis was performed after applying pressure to simulate weight-bearing, and pressure distribution on the tibial surface was analyzed. We also conducted biomechanical testing using a weight-bearing rig with six cadavers. We measured the pressure at the tibial surface with the position of different components and lower limb alignment.

FINDINGS

Peak pressure on the medial or lateral side of the tibia was determined by the mechanical axis. When tibial components are in 3°,5° and 7° of valgus/varus and femoral components are in 3°,5° and 7° of varus/valgus correspondence, no peak pressure was detected with normal alignment, despite malpositioned components.

INTERPRETATION

Lower limb alignment is more critical than the position of the component. Medial and lateral tibial compartment pressures were evenly distributed if the alignment was neutral. Malpositioned femoral or tibial components changed the femorotibial mechanical axis, and peak pressure of the proximal tibia was positively related to alignment.

Functional Alignment Philosophy in Total Knee Arthroplasty – Rationale and technique for the varus morphotype using a CT based robotic platform and individualized planning

Introduction: Alignment techniques in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continue to evolve. Functional alignment (FA) is a novel technique that utilizes robotic tools to deliver TKA with the aim of respecting individual anatomical variations. The purpose of this paper is to describe the rationale and technique of FA in the varus morphotype with the use of a robotic platform. Rationale: FA reproduces constitutional knee anatomy within quantifiable target ranges. The principles are founded on a comprehensive assessment and understanding of individual anatomical variations with the aim of delivering personalized TKA. The principles are functional pre-operative planning, reconstitution of native coronal alignment, restoration of dynamic sagittal alignment within 5° of neutral, maintenance of joint-line-obliquity and height, implant sizing to match anatomy and a joint that is balanced in flexion and extension through manipulation of implant positioning rather than soft tissue releases. Technique: An individualized plan is created from pre-operative imaging. Next, a reproducible and quantifiable method of soft tissue laxity assessment is performed in extension and flexion that accounts for individual variation in soft tissue laxity. A dynamic virtual 3D model of the joint and implant position that can be manipulated in all three planes is modified to achieve target gap measurements while maintaining the joint line phenotype and a final limb position within a defined coronal and sagittal range. Conclusion: Functional alignment is a novel knee arthroplasty technique that aims to restore constitutional bony alignment and balance the laxity of the soft tissues by placing and sizing implants in a manner that it respects the variations in individual anatomy. This paper presents the approach for the varus morphotype.

Radiographic analysis using the hip-to-calcaneus line and its association with lower limb joint kinetics in varus knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to (1) determine whether the hip to ankle (HA) line or hip to calcaneus (HC) line better reflects knee coronal plane kinetics, (2) to examine whether the HC line reflects ankle coronal plane kinetics, and (3) to evaluate the radiological and biomechanical aspects of ankle in varus knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Full-length, postero-anterior radiographs (hip-to-calcaneus radiographs) were taken and gait analysis was performed in 21 varus knee OA patients. The %HA where the HA lines pass through the tibial plateau, and the %HC and the mechanical ankle joint axis point (MAJAP), where the HC line passes through the tibial plateau and tibial plafond, respectively, were calculated. Knee adduction angular impulse (KAAI) and ankle inversion angular impulse (AIAI) were collected as kinetic data. Finally, we divided the patients into two groups with and without ankle OA, and compared each parameter between both groups.

RESULTS

The %HA and %HC were correlated with KAAI (%HA; r = -0.68, P = 0.001, %HC; r = -0.81, P < 0.001, respectively) and MAJAP was correlated with AIAI (r = -0.55, P = 0.009). MAJAP was significantly smaller, and KAAI and AIAI were significantly larger in the ankle OA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiographic analysis using the HC line was more strongly correlated to knee joint kinetics than the HA line and was also correlated to ankle joint kinetics. Assessing lower limb alignment using the HC line could be useful to evaluate the knee and ankle joints for varus knee OA.

[Effectiveness analysis of lateral condyle sliding osteotomy in total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of lateral femoral bowing deformity]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of lateral condyle sliding osteotomy (LCSO) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the treatment of lateral femoral bowing deformity.

METHODS

The clinical data of 17 patients with lateral femoral bowing deformity treated by LCSO during TKA between July 2018 and July 2020 was retrospectively analysed. There were 3 males and 14 females, with an average of 63.2 years (range, 58-68 years). The etiology of lateral femoral bowing deformity included 12 cases of femoral developmental deformity and 5 cases of femoral fracture malunion. Kellgren-Lawrence classification of knee osteoarthritis was 4 cases of grade Ⅲ and 13 cases of grade Ⅳ. The preoperative hip-knee shaft was 9.5°-12.5° (mean, 10.94°). The disease duration was 3-25 years (mean, 15.1 years). The mechanical lateral distal femur angle (mLDFA), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), and mechanical axis deviation (MAD) of the distal femur were measured before operation and at last follow-up to evaluate the correction of extra-articular deformities in the joints and the recovery of mechanical force lines of the lower extremities. The knee society score (KSS) knee score and function score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, knee joint range of motion (ROM) were used to evaluate effectiveness. The knee varus/valgus stress test and osteotomy healing by X-ray films were performed to evaluate the joint stability and the safety of LCSO.

RESULTS

All incisions of the patients healed by first intention after operation, and there was no early postoperative complication such as infection of the incision and deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities. All 17 patients were followed up 12-36 months, with an average of 23.9 months. The osteotomy slices all achieved bony healing, and the healing time was 2-5 months, with an average of 3.1 months. After operation, the knee varus/valgus stress tests were negative, and there was no relaxation and rupture of the lateral collateral ligament, instability of the knee joint, loosening, revision and infection of the prosthesis occurred. At last follow-up, mLDFA, HKA, MAD, knee ROM, VAS score, KSS knee score and function score significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

LCSO is effective and safe in TKA with lateral femoral bowing deformity. Extra-articular deformities are corrected intra-articularly. The mechanical force line and joint balance of the lower extremities can be restored simultaneously in an operation.

Comparison of Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty Involving Postoperative Neutral or Residual Mild Varus Alignment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Comparing mainly clinical and functional outcomes as well as prosthesis survival with neutral and residual mild varus alignment, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases from 1 January 1974 to 18 December 2020 to identify studies comparing clinical and functional outcomes as well as prosthesis survival in the presence of different alignments after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for varus knees. The included studies were assessed by two researchers according to the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). Postoperative neutral alignment (0° ± 3°) was compared to residual mild varus (3°–6°) and residual severe varus (>6°). Meta‐analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. The odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) were used to compare dichotomous and continuous variables. The fixed‐effect model and random‐effect model were used to meta‐analyze the data. Nine studies were included in the meta‐analysis with 1410 cases of postoperative neutral alignment, 564 of residual mild varus alignment and 175 of residual severe varus alignment following TKA, all of which were published after 2013. Three studies scored 7 points on the NOS, while the remaining studies scored 8 points, suggesting high quality. The pooled mean differences (MDs) of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score were 1.07 [95% confidence interval (CI) −1.06 to 3.20; P = 0.32; I² = 79%]. The meta‐analysis showed that neutral alignment and mild varus alignment were associated with similar the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Knee Score (KS‐KS), and Knee Society Function Score (KS‐FS), while neutral alignment was associated with lower Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) [mean difference −6.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) −9.37 to −2.64, P = 0.0005]. Neutral alignment was associated with higher KS‐KS than severe alignment (M 2.98, 95% CI 1.42 to 4.55, P = 0.0002; I² = 0%) as well as higher KS‐FS (M 8.20, 95% CI 4.58 to 11.82, P < 0.00001; I² = 0%). Neutral alignment was associated with similar rate of survival as mild varus alignment (95% CI 0.36 to 9.10; P = 0.48; I² = 65%) or severe varus alignment (95% CI 0.94 to 37.90; P = 0.06; I² = 61%). There was no statistical difference in others. Residual mild varus alignment after TKA may lead to similar or superior outcomes than neutral alignment in patients with preoperative varus knees, yet the available evidence appears to be insufficient to replace the current gold standard of neutral alignment. Severe varus alignment should be avoided.

Knee joint loadings are related to tibial torsional alignments in people with radiographic medial knee osteoarthritis

Torsional malalignment was detected in subjects with medial knee osteoarthritis (KOA) but few studies have reported the effect of torsional deformity on knee joint loads during walking. Therefore, this study examined the relationships between lower limb torsional alignments and knee joint loads during gait in people with symptomatic medial KOA using cross-sectional study design. Lower limb alignments including tibial torsion, tibiofemoral rotation and varus/valgus alignments in standing were measured by EOS low-dose bi-planar x-ray system in 47 subjects with mild or moderate KOA. The external knee adduction moment (KAM), flexion moment (KFM) and the KAM index which was defined as (KAM/ (KAM+KFM)*100) during walking were analyzed using a motion analysis system so as to estimate the knee loads. Results revealed externaltibial torsion was positively associated with KAM in subjects with moderate KOA (r = 0.59, p = 0.02) but not in subjects with mild KOA. On the contrary, significant association was found between knee varus/valgus alignment and KAM in the mild KOA group (r = 0.58, p<0.001) and a sign of association in the moderate KOA group (r = 0.47, p = 0.08). We concluded tibial torsion and knee varus/valgus mal-alignments would be associated with joint loading in subjects with moderate medial KOA during walking. Radiographic severity might need to be considered when using gait modification as a rehabilitation strategy for this condition.

Quantitative evaluation of gait features after total knee arthroplasty: Comparison with age and sex-matched controls

BACKGROUND

Gait function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is suboptimal. However, quantified analysis with comparing a control group is lacking.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The aims of this study were 1) to compare the gait before and after TKA and 2) to compare postoperative gait to that of an age-sex matched control group.

METHODS

This study consisted of 46 female and 38 male patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis who underwent bilateral TKA, and 84 age- and sex-matched controls without knee pain and osteoarthritis. Seven gait parameters, including lower extremity alignment, knee adduction moment (KAM), knee flexion angle, external knee flexion moment, hip adduction angle, external hip adduction moment, and the varus-valgus arc during the stance phase, were collected using a commercial opto-electric gait analysis system. Principal component analysis was used for data processing and the standardized mean differences (SMDs) of the principal component scores were compared.

RESULTS

The most significant gait change after TKA was the alignment (SMD 1.62, p < 0.001). The average stance phase alignment changed from varus 7.3° to valgus 0.5°. The second significant change was a decrease of the KAM (SMD 1.08, p < 0.001). These two features were closely correlated (r = 0.644, p < 0.001). The gait feature that differed most from the controls was the varus-valgus arc during the stance phase (SMD 1.68, p < 0.001), which was constrained by 31% after TKA (p < 0.001) and was only 37% compared to the controls (p < 0.001).

SIGNIFICANCE

Improvement in gait after TKA was obtained through alignment correction. However, TKA significantly constrained coronal knee motion. TKA improved gait suboptimally; the gait was significantly different from that of controls.