Cartilage recovery in runners with and without knee osteoarthritis: A pilot study

Comparing the Effect of Mechanical Loading on Deep and Superficial Cartilage Using Quantitative UTE MRI

BACKGROUND

The biomechanical properties of deep and superficial cartilage may be different, yet in vivo MRI validation is required.

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of mechanical loading on deep and superficial cartilage in young healthy adults using ultrashort echo time (UTE)-T2* mapping.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective, intervention.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-one healthy adults (54.8% females, median age = 23 years).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3-T, PD-FS, and UTE sequences with four echo times (TEs = 0.1, 0.5, 2.8, and 4.0 msec; 0.6 mm isotropic spatial resolution) of the left knee, acquired before and after loading exercise.

ASSESSMENT

Quantitative UTE-T2* maps of the entire knee were generated using UTE images of four TEs. In deep and superficial cartilage of patella, medial and lateral femur, medial and lateral tibia cartilage (PC, MFC, LFC, MTC, and LTC), which were segmented manually, cartilage thickness and T2* values before and after loading were measured, extracted, taken averages of, and compared. Scan-rescan repeatability was evaluated. Body weight and body mass index (BMI) data were collected. Physical activity levels were evaluated using International Physical Activity Questionnaire.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Paired sample t-tests, paired Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney tests, Pearson and Spearman correlation analyses, Kruskal-Wallis tests with post-hoc Bonferroni correction. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The scan-rescan repeatability was good (RMSA-CV < 10%). After exercise, deep cartilage exhibited no significant differences in cartilage thickness (PPC = 0.576, PMTC = 0.991, PMFC = 0.899, PLTC = 0.861, PLFC = 0.290) and T2* values (PPC = 0.914, PMTC = 0.780, PMFC = 0.754, PLTC = 0.327, PLFC = 0.811), which both significantly decreased in superficial PC, MFC, LFC, and MTC. The T2* values of superficial MTC and deep MFC were moderately correlated with higher body weight (ρ = 0.431) and lower BMI (ρ = -0.499), respectively.

DATA CONCLUSION

Deep and superficial cartilage may respond differently to mechanical loading as assessed by UTE-T2*.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Characterization of the in vivo transient responses of the femoral cartilage by means of quantitative ultrasound imaging techniques

BACKGROUND

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques are new diagnostic tools able to identify changes in structural and material properties of the investigated tissue. For the first time, we evaluated the capability of QUS techniques in determining the in vivo transient changes in knee joint cartilage after a stressful task.

METHODS

An ultrasound scanner collecting B-mode and radiofrequency data simultaneously was used to collect data from the femoral cartilage of the right knee in 15 participants. Cartilage thickness (CTK), ultrasound roughness index (URI), average magnitude ratio (AMR), and Nakagami parameters (NA) were evaluated before, immediately after and every 5 min up to 45 min a stressful task (30 min of running on a treadmill with a negative slope of 5%).

RESULTS

CTK was affected by time (main effect: p < 0.001). Post hoc test showed significant differences with CTK at rest, which were observed up to 30 min after the run. AMR and NA were affected by time (p < 0.01 for both variables), while URI was unaffected by it. For AMR, post hoc test showed significant differences with rest values in the first 35 min of recovery, while NA was increased compared to rest values in all time points.

CONCLUSION

Data suggest that a single running trial is not able to modify the integrity of the femoral cartilage, as reported by URI data. In vivo evaluation of QUS parameters of the femoral cartilage (NA, AMR, and URI) are able to characterize changes in cartilage properties over time.

Imaging of joint response to exercise with MRI and PET

Imaging of the joint in response to loading stress may provide additional measures of joint structure and function beyond conventional, static imaging studies. Exercise such as running, stair climbing, and squatting allows evaluation of the joint response to larger loading forces than during weight bearing. Quantitative MRI (qMRI) may assess properties of cartilage and meniscus hydration and organization in vivo that have been investigated to assess the functional response of these tissues to physiological stress. [18F]sodium fluoride ([18F]NaF) interrogates areas of newly mineralizing bone and provides an opportunity to study bone physiology, including perfusion and mineralization rate, as a measure of joint loading stress. In this review article, methods utilizing quantitative MRI, PET, and hybrid PET-MRI systems for assessment of the joint response to loading from exercise in vivo are examined. Both methodology and results of various studies performed are outlined and discussed. Lastly, the technical considerations, challenges, and future opportunities for these approaches are addressed.

Comparison of Dynamic Knee Contact Mechanics with T2 Imaging in Different Ages of Healthy Participants

Aging is a known risk factor for Osteoarthritis (OA), however, relations between cartilage composition and aging remain largely unknown in understanding human OA. T2 imaging provides an approach to assess cartilage composition. Whether these T2 relaxation times in the joint contact region change with time during gait remain unexplored. The study purpose was to demonstrate a methodology for linking dynamic joint contact mechanics to cartilage composition as measured by T2 relaxometry. T2 relaxation times for unloaded cartilage were measured in a 3T General Electric magnetic resonance (MR) scanner in this preliminary study. High-speed biplanar video-radiography (HSBV) was captured for five 20-30-year-old and five 50-60-year-old participants with asymptomatic knees. By mapping the T2 cartilages to the dynamic contact regions, T2 values were averaged over the contact area at each measurement within the gait cycle. T2 values demonstrated a functional relationship across the gait cycle. There were no statistically significant differences between 20- and 30-year-old and 50-60-year-old participant T2 values at first force peak of the gait cycle in the medial femur (p = 1.00, U = 12) or in the medial tibia (p = 0.31, U = 7). In the medial and lateral femur in swing phase, the joint moved from a region of high T2 values at 75% of gait to a minimum at 85-95% of swing. The lateral femur and tibia demonstrated similar patterns to the medial compartments but were less pronounced. This research advances understanding of the linkage between cartilage contact and cartilage composition. The change from a high T2 value at ~ 75% of gait to a lower value near the initiation of terminal swing (90% gait) indicates that there are changes to T2 averages corresponding to changes in the contact region across the gait cycle. No differences were found between age groups for healthy participants. These preliminary findings provide interesting insights into the cartilage composition corresponding to dynamic cyclic motion and inform mechanisms of osteoarthritis.

Immediate and Delayed Effects of Joint Loading Activities on Knee and Hip Cartilage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The impact of activity-related joint loading on cartilage is not clear. Abnormal loading is considered to be a mechanical driver of osteoarthritis (OA), yet moderate amounts of physical activity and rehabilitation exercise can have positive effects on articular cartilage. Our aim was to investigate the immediate effects of joint loading activities on knee and hip cartilage in healthy adults, as assessed using magnetic resonance imaging. We also investigated delayed effects of activities on healthy cartilage and the effects of activities on cartilage in adults with, or at risk of, OA. We explored the association of sex, age and loading duration with cartilage changes.

METHODS

A systematic review of six databases identified studies assessing change in adult hip and knee cartilage using MRI within 48 h before and after application of a joint loading intervention/activity. Studies included adults with healthy cartilage or those with, or at risk of, OA. Joint loading activities included walking, hopping, cycling, weightbearing knee bends and simulated standing within the scanner. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analysis estimated the percentage change in compartment-specific cartilage thickness or volume and composition (T2 relaxation time) outcomes. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system evaluated certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Forty studies of 653 participants were included after screening 5159 retrieved studies. Knee cartilage thickness or volume decreased immediately following all loading activities investigating healthy adults; however, GRADE assessment indicated very low certainty evidence. Patellar cartilage thickness and volume reduced 5.0% (95% CI 3.5, 6.4, I² = 89.3%) after body weight knee bends, and tibial cartilage composition (T2 relaxation time) decreased 5.1% (95% CI 3.7, 6.5, I² = 0.0%) after simulated standing within the scanner. Hip cartilage data were insufficient for pooling. Secondary outcomes synthesised narratively suggest knee cartilage recovers within 30 min of walking and 90 min of 100 knee bends. We found contrasting effects of simulated standing and walking in adults with, or at risk of, OA. An increase of 10 knee bend repetitions was associated with 2% greater reduction in patellar thickness or volume.

CONCLUSION

There is very low certainty evidence that minimal knee cartilage thickness and volume and composition (T2 relaxation time) reductions (0-5%) occur after weightbearing knee bends, simulated standing, walking, hopping/jumping and cycling, and the impact of knee bends may be dose dependent. Our findings provide a framework of cartilage responses to loading in healthy adults which may have utility for clinicians when designing and prescribing rehabilitation programs and providing exercise advice.

Trajectory of knee health in runners with and without heightened osteoarthritis risk: the TRAIL prospective cohort study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Running is one of the most popular recreational activities worldwide, due to its low cost and accessibility. However, little is known about the impact of running on knee joint health in runners with and without a history of knee surgery. The primary aim of this longitudinal cohort study is to compare knee joint structural features on MRI and knee symptoms at baseline and 4-year follow-up in runners with and without a history of knee surgery. Secondary aims are to explore the relationships between training load exposures (volume and/or intensity) and changes in knee joint structure and symptoms over 4 years; explore the relationship between baseline running biomechanics, and changes in knee joint structure and symptoms over 4 years. In addition, we will explore whether additional variables confound, modify or mediate these associations, including sex, baseline lower-limb functional performance, knee muscle strength, psychological and sociodemographic factors.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A convenience sample of at least 200 runners (sex/gender balanced) with (n=100) and without (n=100) a history of knee surgery will be recruited. Primary outcomes will be knee joint health (MRI) and knee symptoms (baseline; 4 years). Exposure variables for secondary outcomes include training load exposure, obtained daily throughout the study from wearable devices and three-dimensional running biomechanics (baseline). Additional variables include lower limb functional performance, knee extensor and flexor muscle strength, biomarkers, psychological and sociodemographic factors (baseline). Knowledge and beliefs about osteoarthritis will be obtained through predefined questions and semi-structured interviews with a subset of participants. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models, adjusting for potential confounding factors, will explore changes in knee joint structural features and symptoms, and the influence of potential modifiers and mediators.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approved by the La Trobe University Ethics Committee (HEC-19524). Findings will be disseminated to stakeholders, peer-review journals and conferences.

Is running good or bad for your knees? A systematic review and meta-analysis of cartilage morphology and composition changes in the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints

BACKGROUND

The general health benefits of running are well-established, yet concern exists regarding the development and progression of osteoarthritis.

AIM

To systematically review the immediate (within 20 min) and delayed (20 min-48 h) effect of running on hip and knee cartilage, as assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHOD

Studies using MRI to measure change in hip or knee cartilage within 48 h pre- and post-running were identified. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Percentage change in cartilage outcomes were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. Certainty of evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies were included, evaluating 446 knees only. One third of studies were low risk of bias. Knee cartilage thickness and volume decreased immediately after running, with declines ranging from 3.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.6%, 4.1%) for weight-bearing femoral cartilage volume to 4.9% (95% CI: 4.43.6%, 6.2%) for patellar cartilage volume. T1ρ and T2 relaxation times were also reduced immediately after running, with the largest decline being 13.1% (95% CI: -14.4%, -11.7%) in femoral trochlear cartilage. Tibiofemoral cartilage T2 relaxation times recovered to baseline levels within 91 min. Existing cartilage defects were unchanged within 48 h post-run.

CONCLUSIONS

There is very low certainty evidence that running immediately decreases the thickness, volume, and relaxation times of patellofemoral and tibiofemoral cartilage. Hip cartilage changes are unknown, but knee changes are small and appear transient suggesting that a single bout of running is not detrimental to knee cartilage.

How Physical Activity Affects Knee Cartilage and a Standard Intervention Procedure for an Exercise Program: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: Cartilage degeneration with the natural aging process and the role of physical activity on cartilage wellness is still not clear. The objective of the present review was to understand how different physical activity interventions affect the cartilage and to propose a Standard Operating Procedure for an exercise program to maintain knee joint health; (2) Methods: Articles were collected on three different electronic databases and screened against the eligibility criteria. Results were collected in tables and the main outcomes were discussed narratively; (3) Results: A total of 24 studies have been included after the screening process and aerobic, strength, flexibility, postural balance, and mobility interventions were detected. Different protocols and types of interventions were adopted by the authors; (4) Conclusions: Physical activity interventions have mainly positive outcomes on cartilage structure, but the protocols adopted are different and various. A Standard Operating Procedure has been proposed for a physical intervention focalized on cartilage wellness that could be adopted as an intervention in the clinical setting. Furthermore, the creation of a standardized protocol wants to help scientific research to move in the same direction.

Do the General Public and Health Care Professionals Think That Running Is Bad for the Knees? A Cross-sectional International Multilanguage Online Survey

Background:

Running is a popular sport with widely recognized health benefits. Given the high rates of knee injury in runners and the growing prevalence of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), it may be useful to assess perceptions about running and knee joint health.

Purpose:

The objectives of this study were to (1) explore and compare the perceptions of the general public (PUB) and health care professionals (HCPs) on the topic of running and knee health and (2) explore recommendations about running and knee health provided by HCPs.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study.

Methods:

We conducted an online survey between June 18 and October 1, 2020. The questionnaire included questions on running and knee health, and HCPs were asked about their typical recommendations and level of confidence in providing recommendations on the topic. Perceptions (proportions) were compared between the PUB and HCPs using the chi-square test.

Results:

In total, 4521 responses (PUB, n = 2514; HCPs, n = 2007) were analyzed. A greater proportion of HCPs perceived regular running as healthy for knees (86% vs 68%; P < .001). More of the PUB than HCPs ( P < .001) believed that running frequently (29% vs 13%), long distances (54% vs 45%), and on hard surfaces (60% vs 36%) increased the risk of developing KOA. Running for those with KOA was perceived by the PUB as posing an increased risk of getting more knee pain (48%) and needing joint replacement surgery (38%), more so than by HCPs (26% and 17%, respectively). The majority of HCPs reported being relatively confident in providing evidence-based recommendations about running and knee health and mostly recommended that runners with KOA modify training parameters instead of quit.

Conclusion:

More HCPs perceived running as healthy for knees when compared with the PUB. Most HCPs felt confident in providing evidence-based recommendations about running and knee health.

Acute changes in knee cartilage and meniscus following long-distance running in habituate runners: a systematic review on studies using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

Running is among the most popular recreational activities; nonetheless, the acute post-race changes of cartilage or meniscus have rarely been determined. The current study aimed to review the acute changes in knee cartilage and meniscus among habituate runners following long-distance running detected by using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic literature search was performed on those dominate clinical databases which including MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. Included studies should be conducted on healthy marathon runners, and the participants should be examined before and after running by using MRI. Intervention studies were excluded.

RESULTS

A total number of 14 studies were finally included in this review which all examined the cartilage or meniscus by using MRI functional sequences. Among them, six studies quantitatively measured the changes regarding volume of the knee cartilage or/and meniscus. Five studies found that the volume would decrease initially after running. Ten studies reported T2 (T2*) would decrease after running and returned to the baseline in a short term, while T1ρ may remain increased in months. Five studies measured subareas for T2 (T2*) value, and found that the superficial and medial subarea changed more vastly than other regions after running.

CONCLUSION

Runners experience transient changes in the volume and signals of knee cartilage and meniscus after long-distance running. A liquid exchange and material interaction in cartilage and meniscus was observed after running. Superficial and medial areas of knee cartilage and meniscus might be more susceptible to mechanical loading.

Differences in Muscle Demand and Joint Contact Forces Between Running and Skipping

Skipping has been proposed as a viable cross-training exercise to running due to its lower knee contact forces and higher whole-body energy expenditure. However, how individual muscle forces, energy expenditure, and joint loading are affected by differences in running and skipping mechanics remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare individual muscle forces, energy expenditure, and lower extremity joint contact forces between running and skipping using musculoskeletal modeling and simulations of young adults (n = 5) performing running and skipping at 2.5 m·s−1 on an instrumented treadmill. In agreement with previous work, running had greater knee and patella contact forces than skipping which was accompanied by greater knee extensor energetic demand. Conversely, skipping had greater ankle contact forces and required greater energetic demand from the uniarticular ankle plantarflexors. There were no differences in hip contact forces between gaits. These findings further support skipping as a viable alternative to running if the primary goal is to reduce joint loading at the commonly injured patellofemoral joint. However, for those with ankle injuries, skipping may not be a viable alternative due to the increased ankle loads. These findings may help clinicians prescribe activities most appropriate for a patient’s individual training or rehabilitation goals.

Characterizing the transient response of knee cartilage to running: Decreases in cartilage T2 of female recreational runners

Cartilage transmits and redistributes biomechanical loads in the knee joint during exercise. Exercise-induced loading alters cartilage hydration and is detectable using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), where T₂ relaxation time (T₂ ) is influenced by cartilage collagen composition, fiber orientation, and changes in the extracellular matrix. This study characterized short-term transient responses of healthy knee cartilage to running-induced loading using bilateral scans and image registration. Eleven healthy female recreational runners (33.73 ± 4.22 years) and four healthy female controls (27.25 ± 1.38 years) were scanned on a 3T GE MRI scanner with quantitative 3D double-echo in steady-state before running over-ground (runner group) or resting (control group) for 40 min. Subjects were scanned immediately post-activity at 5-min intervals for 60 min. T₂ times were calculated for femoral, tibial, and patellar cartilage at each time point and analyzed using a mixed-effects model and Bonferroni post hoc. There were immediate decreases in T₂ (mean ± SEM) post-run in superficial femoral cartilage of at least 3.3% ± 0.3% (p = .002) between baseline and Time 0 that remained for 25 min, a decrease in superficial tibial cartilage T₂ of 2.9% ± 0.4% (p = .041) between baseline and Time 0, and a decrease in superficial patellar cartilage T₂ of 3.6% ± 0.3% (p = .020) 15 min post-run. There were decreases in the medial posterior region of superficial femoral cartilage T₂ of at least 5.3 ± 0.2% (p = .022) within 5 min post-run that remained at 60 min post-run. These results increase understanding of transient responses of healthy cartilage to repetitive, exercise-induced loading and establish preliminary recommendations for future definitive studies of cartilage response to running.

The Influence of Running on Lower Limb Cartilage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Running is a popular activity practiced worldwide. It is important to understand how running affects joint health to provide recommendations to sports medicine practitioners and runners.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to summarize the influence of running on lower limb cartilage morphology and composition using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Prospective repeated-measures studies evaluating cartilage using MRI before and after running were included. Data sources included Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, SportDiscus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials. Qualitative analyses considered the number and methodological quality ratings of studies based on the QualSyst tool, and recommendations were based on the strength of evidence (strong, moderate, limited, or very limited). Quantitative analysis involved meta-analyses, for which effect sizes were calculated as Hedge's g standardized mean differences.

RESULTS

We included 43 articles, assessing seven outcomes (lesions, volume, thickness, glycosaminoglycan content, and T1ρ, T2, and T2* relaxation times). Nineteen articles were rated as high quality, 24 were rated as moderate quality, and none were rated as low quality. Qualitative analyses suggest that running may cause an immediate reduction in knee cartilage volume, thickness, as well as T1ρ and T2 relaxation times immediately; however, these changes did not persist. Meta-analyses revealed a small and moderate decrease immediately following a single running bout in T2 relaxation time in the medial femur and tibia, respectively. Qualitative analyses indicated that the influence of repeated exposure to running on cartilage morphology and composition was limited. Despite conflicting evidence regarding pre-existing knee cartilage lesions, moderate evidence suggests that running does not lead to the formation of new lesions. Repeated running exposure did not cause changes to foot and ankle cartilage thickness or composition.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes to lower limb cartilage following running are transient. Immediate changes to cartilage morphology and composition, which likely reflect natural fluid dynamics, do not persist and were generally not significant when pooled statistically. Results suggest that cartilage recovers well from a single running bout and adapts to repeated exposure. Given that moderate evidence indicates that running does not lead to new lesions, future trials should focus on clinical populations, such as those with osteoarthritis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Longitudinal study of the morphological and T2* changes of knee cartilages of marathon runners using prototype software for automatic cartilage segmentation

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of long-distance running on the morphological and T2* assessment of knee cartilage.

METHODS

3D-DESS and T2* mapping was performed in 12 amateur marathon runners (age: between 21 and 37 years) without obvious morphological cartilage damage. MRI was performed three times: within 24 h before the marathon, within 12 h after the marathon, and after a period of convalescence of two months. An automatic cartilage segmentation method was used to quantitatively assessed the morphological and T2* of knee cartilage pre- and post-marathon. The cartilage thickness, volume, and T2* values of 21 sub-regions were quantitatively assessed, respectively.

RESULTS

The femoral lateral central (FLC) cartilage thickness was increased when 12-h post-marathon compared with pre-marathon. The tibial medial anterior (TMA) cartilage thickness was decreased when 2 months post-marathon compared with pre-marathon. The tibial lateral posterior (TLP) cartilage volume was increased when 12-h post-marathon compared with pre-marathon. The cartilage T2* value in most sub-regions had the upward trend when 12-h post-marathon and restored trend when 2 months post-marathon, compared with pre-marathon. The femoral lateral anterior (FLA) and TMA cartilage volumes were decreased 2 months post-marathon compared with pre-marathon.

CONCLUSIONS

The marathon had some effects on the thickness, volume, and T2* value of the knee cartilages. The thickness and volume of knee cartilage in most sub-regions were without significantly changes post-marathon compared with pre-marathon. T2* value of knee cartilage in most sub-regions was increased right after marathon and recovered 2 months later. The TLP and TMA subregions needed follow-up after marathon.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The morphological and T2* changes of knee cartilage after marathon were evaluated by MRI and automatic segmentation software. This study was the first to use cartilage automatic segmentation software to evaluate the effects of marathon on the morphology and biochemical components of articular cartilage, and to predict the most vulnerable articular cartilage subregions, for the convenience of future exercise adjustment and the avoidance of sports cartilage injury.