Comparison of intraoperative kinematics and their influence on the clinical outcomes between posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty and bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty

The Factors Impacting on Patient-Reported Outcomes After Bicruciate-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty for Varus Knee Osteoarthritis

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the factors affecting patient-reported outcomes after bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (BCS TKA) in patients.

Methods

We retrospectively examined 122 knees with primary varus knee osteoarthritis that underwent BCS TKA. This study analyzed preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative predictors of patient satisfaction and persistent postsurgical pain following BCS TKA at 1 year after surgery. We evaluated persistent postsurgical pain using Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain subscale and patient satisfaction using a visual analog scale.

Results

The univariate analysis showed a significant negative correlation between the KOOS pain subscale and three factors: the preoperative central sensitization inventory (CSI) score, medial joint laxity at 90° flexion, and acute postsurgical pain. Patient satisfaction was significantly positively correlated with lateral joint laxity at 90° flexion and postoperative extension angle. Acute postsurgical pain had a significant negative correlation with patient satisfaction. The multiple regression analysis revealed preoperative CSI score and medial joint laxity at 90° flexion influenced patients' KOOS pain subscale responses. Only lateral joint laxity at 90° flexion had an impact on patient satisfaction.

Conclusions

The acquisition of adequate soft tissue balance according to the concept of BCS TKA and preoperative central sensitization syndrome affects the clinical outcomes in BCS TKA.

The Influence of Preimplant Balancing on Manipulation under Anesthesia Rates following Imageless Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Acquired idiopathic stiffness (AIS) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often requires manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). Robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) systems provide gap balance templates for objective correlation with the rate of AIS. The purpose of this study was to assess intraoperative balancing parameters that were associated with MUA utilizing an "anatomical" implant design.We performed a retrospective chart review of 265 imageless RA-TKA procedures performed by R.M. and K.D. between 2018 and 2020. The primary outcome for AIS or clinically significant "arthrofibrosis" was MUA. Patient intraoperative gap planning data were examined for association.The rate of MUA was 8.7% (23/265), which was performed at a mean follow-up time of 75.9 ± 32.2 days. The lateral to medial gap difference in extension was significantly less in patients requiring MUA (odds ratio [OR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.99) (p = 0.034). Significantly less preoperative varus mechanical axis was associated with knees requiring MUA (1.83° vs. 4.04°, OR = 1.09, 95% CI, 1.00-1.19). Decreased templated mechanical axis correction was associated with MUA (2.09° vs. 4.75°, p < 0.0001).A tighter lateral-to-medial gap in extension, less preoperative varus, and smaller templated mechanical axis corrections were associated with increased rates of MUA.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Biomechanical Variables That May Be Related to Knee Functions Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a commonly performed surgery aimed at alleviating pain and improving functionality. However, patients often face uncertainties in selecting the timing, location, and type of TKA implant that best meets their needs. This study aims to comprehensively compare various variables, explore trends, and identify factors potentially influencing TKA outcomes. A cohort of 40 TKA subjects received either unilateral posterior stabilized (Persona) TKA or bi-cruciate stabilized (Journey II) TKA. Additionally, 20 healthy controls matched for age, gender, and BMI were included. Participants underwent patient-reported outcome assessments, range of motion evaluations, balance assessments, proprioception tests, and biomechanical analyses. These analyses covered motion, loading, and electromyography during five daily activities and two clinical tests. Multifactor ANOVA was utilized to compare 283 variables and assess their impact on TKA outcomes. A knee biomechanics index was formulated to evaluate deviations from healthy norms. Significant differences were observed in EMG varus/valgus rotation during both ramp-up and ramp-down phases between the two implant groups. Although significant improvements were noted post-TKA for both implants, the results remained below those of the control group. Gender, age, and BMI exhibited noticeable effects on TKA outcomes across several biomechanical variables and demonstrated significant disparities compared to the controls.

Intraoperative reliability of the tibial anteroposterior axis "Akagi's Line" in total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

The tibial anatomical anteroposterior (AP) axis "Akagi's line" was originally defined on computed tomography (CT) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, its intraoperative reproducibility remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the intraoperative reproducibility of the Akagi's line and its effect on postoperative clinical outcomes.

Methods

This prospective study included 171 TKAs. The rotational angle of the intraoperative Akagi's line relative to the original Akagi's line (RAA) defined on CT was measured. The RAA was calculated based on the tibial component rotational angles relative to the intraoperative Akagi's line measured using the navigation system and CT. The effects of RAA on postoperative clinical outcomes and rotational alignments of components were also evaluated.

Results

The mean absolute RAA (standard deviation) value was 5.5° (3.9°). The range of RAA was 22° internal rotation to 16° external rotation. Intraoperative Akagi's line outliers (RAA > 10°) were observed in 14% of the knees (24 knees). In outlier analysis, the tibial component rotation angle was externally rotated 6.5° (5.6°) in the outlier group and externally rotated 3.7° (4.2°) in the nonoutlier group (≤10°), with a significant difference between the two groups. Additionally, the outlier group (RAA > 10°) showed lower postoperative clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

The original Akagi's line defined on CT showed insufficient reproducibility intraoperatively. The poor intraoperative detection of Akagi's line could be the reason for the tibial component rotational error and worse postoperative clinical outcomes.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, case series.

Comparing Outcomes of Bicruciate-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Bicruciate-stabilized (BCS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to restore normal kinematics by replicating the function of both cruciate ligaments. Conventional cruciate-retaining (CR) design in TKA has shown previous clinical success with lower complication rates. This study compared the patient-reported outcomes between the BCS and CR TKA designs.

Methods

This retrospective study examined patients who underwent primary TKA using a CR or a BCS implant. Patient demographics, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were compared between two cohorts. Patient-reported outcome measures were analyzed using independent samples t-tests.

Results

There were no significant preoperative demographic differences between groups. The CR cohort (n = 756) had significantly higher average KOOS, JR Scores compared to the BCS cohort (n = 652) at 3 months (59.7 ± 3.8 vs. 53.0 ± 3.9, p < 0.001) and 2 years (62.6 ± 8.0 vs. 53.8 ± 6.7, p = 0.001) after TKA. Within the cohort, KOOS, JR delta differences were not significant for CR when comparing patient scores 3 months to 1 year after surgery. Meanwhile, the BCS patients did show significant delta improvement (4.1 ± 1.9, p = 0.030) when compared 3 months to 1 year after surgery. One year postoperatively, the BCS cohort (n = 134) showed a significantly higher average FJS score (49.5 ± 31.4, vs. 36.8 ± 28.5, p = 0.028) than the CR cohort (n = 203). Both cohorts displayed a significant difference in delta improvements within their respective cohort when measuring FJS from 3 months to 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after surgery.

Conclusions

The CR cohort performed better on average, compared to the BCS cohort in measures of KOOS, JR scores at the 2-year follow-up. The BCS cohort performed marginally better regarding FJS only at 1-year follow-up.

Effect of single-radius design on in vivo kinematics during stair activities after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The single-radius design is one of the major total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs and widely used all over the world. The objective of this study was to compare in vivo kinematics between the anteroposterior (AP) single-radius design with mediolateral (ML) single-radius (Non Restricted Geometry; NRG) and ML dual-radius (Triathlon) during stair activities.

METHODS

A total of 21 knees in 18 patients (NRG group: 10 knees in 7 patients, Triathlon group: 11 knees in 11 patients) with a clinically successful posterior stabilized TKA were examined. Under fluoroscopic surveillance, each patient performed stair ascending and descending motions. In vivo kinematics were analyzed using 2D/3D registration technique. The knee flexion angle, rotation angle, varus-valgus angle, AP translation of the femorotibial contact point for both the medial and lateral sides of the knee, and post-cam engagement were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in rotation angle and AP translation at each flexion angle. Examining the varus-valgus angle, the NRG group showed varus position at an early flexion angle during both stair activities.Post-cam engagement was observed in both groups during both stair activities. The mean flexion angle of engagement in the NRG group, the post of which was located anterior to the Triathlon, was larger than that in the Triathlon group during both stair activities.

CONCLUSION

Despite the same AP single-radius TKA, ML single-radius might affect varus motion at an early flexion angle.

Comparison of clinical outcomes among total knee arthroplasties using posterior-stabilized, cruciate-retaining, bi-cruciate substituting, bi-cruciate retaining designs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite the advent of innovative knee prosthesis design, a consistent first-option knee implant design in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remained unsettled. This study aimed to compare the clinical effects among posterior-stabilized (PS), cruciate-retaining (CR), bi-cruciate substituting (BCS), and bi-cruciate retaining designs for primary TKA.

METHODS

Electronic databases were systematically searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies from inception up to July 30, 2021. The primary outcomes were the range of knee motion (ROM), and the secondary outcomes were the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complication and revision rates. Confidence in evidence was assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis. The Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed for synthesis.

RESULTS

A total of 15 RCTs and 18 cohort studies involving 3520 knees were included. The heterogeneity and inconsistency were acceptable. There was a significant difference in ROM at the early follow-up when PS was compared with CR (mean difference [MD] = 3.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07, 7.18) and BCS was compared with CR (MD = 9.69, 95% CI 2.18, 17.51). But at the long-term follow-up, there was no significant difference in ROM in any one knee implant compared with the others. No significant increase was found in the PROMs and complication and revision rates at the final follow-up time.

CONCLUSIONS

At early follow-up after TKA, PS and BCS knee implants significantly outperform the CR knee implant in ROM. But in the long run, the available evidence suggests different knee prostheses could make no difference in clinical outcomes after TKA with extended follow-up.

Kinematic comparison between the knee after bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty and the native knee: A cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Although bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty (BCS-TKA) is expected to provide kinematics similar to those of the normal knee, there are limited data available for comparison of the kinematics of the knee after BCS-TKA with those of the normal knee. The purpose of this study was to confirm whether the knee after BCS-TKA are the same as those of the native knee.

METHODS

Seven fresh-frozen cadavers underwent TKA using a BCS-type prosthesis with navigation system. Anteroposterior translation of the femur and internal rotation of the tibia were evaluated using the navigation system.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in anteroposterior translation of the femur between the native knee and the knee after BCS-TKA in the early flexion phase (0°-30°) or in the deep flexion phase (over 100°). In the middle flexion phase (40°-90°), the knee after BCS-TKA was placed significantly more anteriorly than the native knee. The knee after BCS-TKA also showed a gradual internal rotation pattern similar to that of the native knee but the total tibial internal rotation angle was significantly smaller than that of the native knee. At each angle from 0° to 120° of flexion, internal rotation of the knee after BCS-TKA was significantly greater than that of the native knee.

CONCLUSION

Kinematics of BCS-TKA is close to that of the native knee. However, there is a statistically significant difference in AP position of the femur during mid flexion and initial rotational position of the tibia between the BCS-TKA knee and the native knee.

Femoral rollback at high-flexion during squatting is related to the improvement of sports activities after bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: an observational study

BACKGROUND

In bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (BCS-TKA), the relationship between the postoperative kinematics and sports subscales in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between kinematics and sports subscales using the PROMs after BCS-TKA.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with severe knee osteoarthritis were examined at 13.5 ± 7.8 months after BCS-TKA. The patients performed squats under single fluoroscopic surveillance in the sagittal plane. Range of motion of the knee, axial rotation of the femur relative to the tibial component, and anteroposterior (AP) translation of the medial and lateral femorotibial contact points were measured using a 2D-to-3D registration technique. In addition, the relationship between the kinematics and improvement of the sports subscales in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was evaluated.

RESULTS

In rotation angle, the femoral external rotation was observed from 0 to 50° of flexion. The amount of femoral external rotation did not correlate with PROMs-SP. In medial AP translation, posterior translation was observed from 0 to 20° and 80-110° of flexion. Mild anterior translation was observed from 20 to 80° of flexion. Beyond 80° of flexion, posterior translation was positively correlated with squatting. In lateral AP translation, posterior translation was observed from 0 to 20° and 80-110° of flexion. Beyond 80° of flexion, posterior translation was positively correlated with running, jumping, twisting/pivoting, and kneeling.

CONCLUSION

Femoral rollback at high flexion during squatting may be important to improve sports performance after BCS-TKA.

In Vivo three-dimensional kinematics of normal knees during sitting sideways on the floor

Background

The normal knee kinematics during asymmetrical kneeling such as the sitting sideways remains unknown. This study aimed to clarify in vivo kinematics during sitting sideways of normal knees.

Methods

Twelve knees from six volunteers were examined. Under fluoroscopy, each volunteer performed a sitting sideways. A two-dimensional/three-dimensional registration technique was used. The rotation angle, varus-valgus angle, anteroposterior translation of the medial and lateral sides of the femur relative to the tibia, and kinematic pathway in each flexion angle was evaluated.

Results

Bilateral knees during sitting sideways showed a femoral external rotation relative to the tibia with flexion (ipsilateral: 13.7 ± 3.5°, contralateral: 5.8 ± 6.8°). Whereas the ipsilateral knees showed valgus movement of 4.6 ± 2.5° from 130° to 150° of flexion, and the contralateral knees showed varus movement of -3.1 ± 4.4° from 110° to 150° of flexion. The medial side of the contralateral knees was more posteriorly located than that of the ipsilateral knees beyond 110° of flexion. The lateral side of the contralateral knees was more anteriorly located than that of the ipsilateral knees from 120° to 150° of flexion. In the ipsilateral knees, a medial pivot pattern followed by a bicondylar rollback was observed. In the contralateral knees, no significant movement followed by a bicondylar rollback was observed.

Conclusion

Even though the asymmetrical kneeling such as sitting sideways, the knees did not display asymmetrical movement.

The higher patient-reported outcome measure group had smaller external rotation of the femur in bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The hypothesis of this study was that the kinematics of patients with higher patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) differ from those of patients with lower PROMs after bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (BCS-TKA).

METHODS

A total of 32 patients with severe knee osteoarthritis were examined 11.2 ± 3.2 months after BCS-TKA. The patients performed squats under single fluoroscopic surveillance in the sagittal plane. To estimate the spatial position and orientation of the femoral and tibial components, a 2D-to-3D registration technique was used. This technique uses a contour-based registration algorithm, single-view fluoroscopic images and 3D computer-aided design models. Knee range of motion, varus-valgus alignment, axial rotation of the femur relative to the tibial component, anteroposterior translation of the medial and lateral femorotibial contact points, kinematic paths, and anterior and posterior post-cam engagement were measured. The patients were divided into two groups using hierarchical cluster analysis based on the 1-year postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and 2011 Knee Society Score.

RESULTS

The femoral component had significantly more external rotation in the low-score group than in the high-score group (5.1 ± 1.8° vs. 2.2 ± 2.7°, p = 0.02). The high-score group had a medial pivot pattern from 0 to 20° of flexion, without significant movement from 20 to 70°, and final bicondylar rollback beyond 70°. The low-score group had a medial pivot from 0 to 70° of flexion and bicondylar rollback beyond 70°. There were no significant between-group differences in the varus-valgus angle or post-cam engagement.

CONCLUSION

The higher PROM group had smaller external rotation of the femur after BCS-TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Both Intraoperative Medial and Lateral Joint Stabilities at Midflexion Influence Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Bi-Cruciate Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

Bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was developed to approximate normal knee kinematics and is expected to improve clinical outcomes. However, the effects of soft tissue balance at the medial or lateral compartment on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following BCS TKA are unclear. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between the medial or lateral component gaps and PROMs following BCS TKA. One hundred seventeen knees with varus deformities which underwent BCS TKA were included in this study. They were divided into two groups according to the validated Japanese version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for each subscale of pain, symptoms, and activities of daily living (ADL) at 1 year postoperatively: group H consisted of patients with ≥90 points and group L consisted of patients with <90 points. Intraoperative medial and lateral joint laxities at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° flexion measured using a tensor device were compared between the two groups in each subscale. In the pain subscale, the medial joint laxities at 30° (p < 0.05) and 60° flexion (p < 0.05) in group H were significantly smaller than those in group L. In the ADL subscale, the medial joint laxity at 60° flexion in group H was significantly smaller than that in group L (p < 0.05). In the symptom subscale, the lateral joint laxity at 60° flexion in group H was significantly smaller than that in group L (p < 0.05). Surgeons should pay attention to the importance of both medial and lateral joint stabilities to achieve better postoperative PROMs following BCS TKA.

Both intraoperative medial and lateral soft tissue balances influence intraoperative rotational knee kinematics in bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective investigation

Background

Tibial internal rotation following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important in achieving favorable postoperative clinical outcomes. Studies have reported the effect of intraoperative soft tissue balance on tibial internal rotation in conventional TKA, no studies have evaluated the effects of soft tissue balance at medial or lateral compartments separately on tibial internal rotation in bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between medial or lateral component gaps and rotational knee kinematics in BCS TKA.

Methods

One hundred fifty-eight knees that underwent BCS TKA were included in this study. The intraoperative medial and lateral joint laxities which was defined as the value of component gap minus the thickness of the tibial component were firstly divided into two groups, respectively: Group M-stable (medial joint laxity, ≤ 2 mm) or Group M-loose (medial joint laxity, ≥ 3 mm) and Group L-stable (lateral joint laxity, ≤ 3 mm) or Group L-loose (lateral joint laxity, ≥ 4 mm). And finally, the knees enrolled in this study were divided into four groups based on the combination of Group M and Group L: Group A (M-stable and L-stable), Group B (M-stable and L-loose), Group C (M-loose and L-stable), and Group D (M-loose and L-loose). The intraoperative rotational knee kinematics were compared between the four Groups at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° flexion, respectively.

Results

The rotational angular difference between 0° flexion and maximum flexion in Group B at 30° flexion was significantly larger than that in Group A at 30° flexion (*p < 0.05). The rotational angular difference between 30° flexion and maximum flexion in Group B at 30° flexion was significantly larger than that in Group D at 30° flexion (*p < 0.05). The rotational angular differences between 30° or 90° flexion and maximum flexion in Group B at 60° flexion were significantly larger than those in Group A at 60° flexion (*p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Surgeons should pay attention to the importance of medial joint stability at midflexion and lateral joint laxities at midflexion and 90° flexion on a good tibial internal rotation in BCS TKA.

Intraoperative kinematics of bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasty during high-flexion motion of the knee

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether intraoperative kinematics of bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (BCS-TKA) are different for different activities. It has also not been established whether intraoperative high-flexion motions correlate with postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). We aimed to clarify the intraoperative kinematics of BCS-TKA during high-flexion activities and describe the relationship between intraoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

We examined 33 knees from 31 patients who underwent BCS-TKA and measured intraoperative knee kinematics, passive knee flexion, and cross-legged flexion using a navigation system. We also calculated knee flexion, varus-valgus, and rotation angles. As a secondary evaluation, we divided the patients into two clusters based on the PROMs and compared the kinematics between them.

RESULTS

The valgus moved by 1.3 ± 1.3° beyond 90° knee flexion during passive flexion. In contrast, during cross-legged flexion, the varus moved by 4.6 ± 5.1° beyond 30° flexion. This indicated significantly increased varus alignment in the cross-legged flexion as compared with passive flexion. Beyond 60° of flexion, the femur displayed 8.8 ± 4.8° of external rotation relative to the tibia. In cross-legged flexion, the femur displayed 9.2 ± 6.5° of external rotation relative to the tibia beyond 45° of flexion. At 90° of flexion, the cross-legged knees rotated more externally. There were no significant postoperative differences between the high- and low-score clusters.

CONCLUSION

The intraoperative knee kinematics after BCS-TKA during high-flexion motions differed depending on the performance of an individual. This will be useful for physicians who might recommend BCS-TKA to new patients.