Early tibial loosening of the cemented ATTUNE knee arthroplasty - Just a question of design?

Radiolucent lines and revision risk in total knee arthroplasty using the conventional versus the Attune S+ tibial baseplate

Aims

This multicentre retrospective observational study's aims were to investigate whether there are differences in the occurrence of radiolucent lines (RLLs) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between the conventional Attune baseplate and its successor, the novel Attune S+, independent from other potentially influencing factors; and whether tibial baseplate design and presence of RLLs are associated with differing risk of revision.

Methods

A total of 780 patients (39% male; median age 70.7 years (IQR 62.0 to 77.2)) underwent cemented TKA using the Attune Knee System) at five centres, and with the latest radiograph available for the evaluation of RLL at between six and 36 months from surgery. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were performed to assess associations between patient and implant-associated factors on the presence of tibial and femoral RLLs. Differences in revision risk depending on RLLs and tibial baseplate design were investigated with the log-rank test.

Results

The conventional and novel Attune baseplates were used in 349 (45%) and 431 (55%) patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 14 months (IQR 11 to 25), RLLs were present in 29% (n = 228/777) and 15% (n = 116/776) of the tibial and femoral components, respectively, and were more common in the conventional compared to the novel baseplate. The novel baseplate was independently associated with a lower incidence of tibial and femoral RLLs (both regardless of age, sex, BMI, and time to radiograph). One- and three-year revision risk was 1% (95% CI 0.4% to 1.9%)and 6% (95% CI 2.6% to 13.2%), respectively. There was no difference between baseplate design and the presence of RLLs on the the risk of revision at short-term follow-up.

Conclusion

The overall incidence of RLLs, as well as the incidence of tibial and femoral RLLs, was lower with the novel compared to the conventional tibial Attune baseplate design, but higher than in the predecessor design and other commonly used TKA systems.

Short-term survival of the cementless triathlon total knee arthroplasty in a young patient cohort

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to assess the short-term survivorship of a new cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design in comparison to its cemented predecessor design in a young patient cohort less than 65 years of age.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of all primary TKAs (cemented and cementless) in patients under the age of 65 at the time of the index procedure, in a single institution between May 2018 and May 2019. Primary outcome variables included aseptic revision and all-cause revision. Operative time was a secondary variable. Independent variables considered included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, implant type (cruciate-retaining (CR) or posterior-stabilised (PS)) and the use of cemented or cementless implants.

RESULTS

There were 106 cemented TKAs and 152 cementless TKAs (Triathlon, Stryker Inc, Mahwah, NJ ) implanted. The minimum follow-up for all cases was 2 years (mean cementless 32.5 months, mean cemented 34.9 months). Of the entire 258 implants only 2 were revised. Both revisions occurred in the cemented cohort for prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The all-cause revision rate in the cementless cohort was 0% compared to 1.8% in the cemented cohort (p = 0.168). Operative times were significantly reduced from 62 min in the cemented cohort to 52.2 min in the cementless cohort (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In a young patient cohort, the cementless Triathlon TKA demonstrates excellent survivorship at short-term follow-up with significant reductions in operative times when compared to the cemented Triathlon TKA.

Radiological and clinical outcomes after Attune primary total knee arthroplasty using Stemmable Tibia: A two-year follow-up prospective bi-center study

This prospective bi-center study aimed to analyze the outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasty using the Stemmable Tibia Attune system. A total of 100 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty with Stemmable Tibia from January 2019 to December 2021 were enrolled in the study. Radiological outcomes (hip-knee-ankle axis and medial proximal tibial angle) were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively. Clinical outcomes (visual analog scale score, Hospital for Special Surgery score, Knee Society function score, Knee Society knee score, flexion contracture, further flexion, and range of motion) were analyzed preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Complications (periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic loosening) were examined. The hip-knee-ankle axis decreased (preoperative: 9.5° ± 6.3°, postoperative: 1.1° ± 2.7°), whereas the medial proximal tibial angle increased (preoperative: 84.6° ± 4.1°, postoperative: 89.8° ± 1.9°). The visual analog scale score, Hospital for Special Surgery score, Knee Society knee score, and Knee Society function score increased postoperatively. The Knee Society knee score indicated above good outcomes (100.0% and 99.0% at 1 and 2 years postoperatively, respectively). The Knee Society function score also showed above good results (98.0% and 93.0% at 1 and 2 years postoperatively, respectively). The range of motion significantly improved (p < 0.001): flexion contracture decreased from 9.10° ± 7.23° to 2.15° ± 2.87°, whereas further flexion increased from 136.05° ± 14.78° to 139.80° ± 10.02°. One patient developed periprosthetic joint infection; no early loosening was observed. In conclusion, Attune primary total knee arthroplasty with Stemmable Tibia not only is safe and effective but also leads to radiological and clinical improvements.

High rate of radiolucent lines following the cemented original design of the ATTUNE total knee arthroplasty

Aims

Loosening of components after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be associated with the development of radiolucent lines (RLLs). The aim of this study was to assess the rate of formation of RLLs in the cemented original design of the ATTUNE TKA and their relationship to loosening.

Methods

A systematic search was undertaken using the Cochrane methodology in three online databases: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. Studies were screened against predetermined criteria, and data were extracted. Available National Joint Registries in the Network of Orthopaedic Registries of Europe were also screened. A random effects model meta-analysis was undertaken.

Results

Of 263 studies, 12 were included with a total of 3,861 TKAs. Meta-analysis of ten studies showed high rates of overall tibial or femoral RLLs for the cemented original design of the ATTUNE TKA. The overall rate was 21.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.7% to 33.7%) for all types of design but was higher for certain subgroups: 27.4% (95% CI 13.4% to 47.9%) for the cruciate-retaining type, and 29.9% (95% CI 15.6% to 49.6%) for the fixed-bearing type. Meta-analysis of five studies comparing the ATTUNE TKA with other implants showed a significantly higher risk of overall tibial or femoral RLLs (odds ratio (OR) 2.841 (95% CI 1.219 to 6.623); p = 0.016) for the ATTUNE. The rates of loosening or revision for loosening were lower, at 1.2% and 0.9% respectively, but the rates varied from 0% to 16.3%. The registry data did not report specifically on the original ATTUNE TKA or on revision due to loosening, but 'all-cause' five-year revision rates for the cemented ATTUNE varied from 2.6% to 5.9%.

Conclusion

The original cemented ATTUNE TKA has high rates of RLLs, but their clinical significance is uncertain given the overall low associated rates of loosening and revision. However, in view of the high rates of RLLs and the variation in the rates of loosening and revision between studies and registries, close surveillance of patients who have undergone TKA with the original ATTUNE system is recommended.

Medial proximal tibial resorption after total knee arthroplasty according to the design of the cobalt chrome tibial baseplate

PURPOSE

A new tibial baseplate of the cobalt-chrome (CoCr) prosthesis has an enhanced design with additional cement pockets and undersurface with increased roughness compared with the original baseplate. This study aimed to compare the incidence of medial proximal tibial resorption (MPTR) in total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) with the original and new CoCr tibial baseplates.

METHODS

Each of 200 posterior stabilized TKAs with the original (Group O) and new (Group N) CoCr tibial baseplates with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. The matches were made according to age, sex, body mass index, and severity of varus deformity. The occurrence of MPTR was investigated with a radiograph at 2 years postoperatively. MPTR was categorized as type U (resorption under the tibial baseplate; associated with stress shielding), C (resorption around the penetrated cement under the baseplate; associated with thermal necrosis), and M (resorption on the medial tibial cortex without extension to the baseplate; associated with bony devascularization).

RESULTS

The incidence of MPTR was 35% in group O and 24% in group N (p = 0.021) at postoperative 2 years. The U type of MPTR occurred more frequently in group O (26 vs. 15%, p = 0.009). There were no significant differences in the incidence of types C and M MPTR.

CONCLUSION

The modified design of the CoCr tibial baseplate affected the incidence of MTPR. The new tibial baseplate was more advantageous in preventing MPTR than the original baseplate in TKAs using the CoCr prosthesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Impact of Component Design and Fixation on Stress Shielding After Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) tibial baseplate thickness, metallurgy, and implant fixation with cement may influence stress shielding. The purpose of the present study is to compare bone mineral density of 2 cemented and press-fit TKA designs with differing tibial baseplate thicknesses and metallurgy over a 2-year period to assess for changes in stress shielding.

METHODS

One-hundred one TKAs were performed in this Institutional Review Board-approved, prospective study. There were 4 cohorts: DePuy Attune cemented and press-fit, and Stryker Triathlon cemented and press-fit. The Attune tibial baseplate was thicker; both cemented tibial and femoral components were cobalt-chromium. The DePuy Attune press-fit had a cobalt-chromium sintered bead porous coating while the Stryker Triathlon was 3-dimensional printed highly porous titanium alloy. All patients had quantitative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans performed at baseline (4-6 weeks postoperatively) and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Stress shielding was evaluated by comparing percent change in bone mineral density in 11 radiographic zones over 2 years.

RESULTS

Over a 2-year period, there were no differences in stress shielding on the tibial side in either cemented or press-fit between Stryker Triathlon and DePuy Attune; however, there were differences on the femoral side. The press-fit tibial components of the Stryker Triathlon and DePuy Attune had either similar or less stress shielding over a 2-year period compared to their cemented counterparts.

CONCLUSION

This study comparing 2 TKA implants with differing tibial tray thickness did not find significant differences in tibial stress shielding between designs. There was a difference in stress shielding on the femoral side between designs, suggesting that longer term follow-up is warranted.

Does tibial design modification improve implant stability for total knee arthroplasty? An experimental cadaver study

Aims

One of the main causes of tibial revision surgery for total knee arthroplasty is aseptic loosening. Therefore, stable fixation between the tibial component and the cement, and between the tibial component and the bone, is essential. A factor that could influence the implant stability is the implant design, with its different variations. In an existing implant system, the tibial component was modified by adding cement pockets. The aim of this experimental in vitro study was to investigate whether additional cement pockets on the underside of the tibial component could improve implant stability. The relative motion between implant and bone, the maximum pull-out force, the tibial cement mantle, and a possible path from the bone marrow to the metal-cement interface were determined.

Methods

A tibial component with (group S: Attune S+) and without (group A: Attune) additional cement pockets was implanted in 15 fresh-frozen human leg pairs. The relative motion was determined under dynamic loading (extension-flexion 20° to 50°, load-level 1,200 to 2,100 N) with subsequent determination of the maximum pull-out force. In addition, the cement mantle was analyzed radiologically for possible defects, the tibia base cement adhesion, and preoperative bone mineral density (BMD).

Results

The BMD showed no statistically significant difference between both groups. Group A showed for all load levels significantly higher maximum relative motion compared to group S for 20° and 50° flexion. Group S improved the maximum failure load significantly compared to group A without additional cement pockets. Group S showed a significantly increased cement adhesion compared to group A. The cement penetration and cement mantle defect analysis showed no significant differences between both groups.

Conclusion

From a biomechanical point of view, the additional cement pockets of the component have improved the fixation performance of the implant.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(4):229–238.

Early Aseptic Failure of the Tibial Component-Cement Interface in ATTUNE® Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Report of Three Cases

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) systems are designed to maximize the longevity of the implant. However, an unusually high rate of aseptic tibial tray loosening was observed in the DePuy ATTUNE^® total knee arthroplasty system (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, USA). Affected patients noted symptoms of instability and reproducible pain at the bone-implant interface. However, there was no radiographic evidence of lucency or implant failure. Intra-operatively, the tibial component was grossly loose and lacked adhered cement. We hypothesize that the loosening is due to the smooth architecture of the undersurface of the tibial component, lacking either grit blasting or porous coating.

Cement debonding behaviors of the various tibial components of the ATTUNE knee system and its predecessors: Is a cement-in-cement revision an alternative?

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening remains one of the most common causes of revision of the tibial component for total knee arthroplasty. A stable bond between implant and cement is essential for appropriate long-term results. The aim of our in vitro study was to investigate the maximum failure load of tibial ATTUNE prosthesis design alternatives compared with a previous design. In addition, cement-in-cement revision was considered as a potential strategy after tibial component debonding.

METHODS

The experimental investigations of the maximum failure load of the implant-cement interface were performed under optimal conditions, without potential contamination. We compared the designs of the tibial components of the ATTUNE, ATTUNE S+ and P.F.C. Sigma. In addition, we investigated the cement-in-cement revision for the ATTUNE knee system replacing it with an ATTUNE S+.

RESULTS

The maximum failure load showed no significant difference between P.F.C. Sigma and ATTUNE groups (P = 0.087), but there was a significant difference between the P.F.C. Sigma and the ATTUNE S+ groups (P < 0.001). The analysis also showed a significant difference (P < 0.001) between the ATTUNE and the ATTUNE S+ groups for the maximum failure load. The ATTUNE S+ cement-in-cement revision group showed a significant higher failure load (P < 0.001) compared with the P.F.C. Sigma and ATTUNE groups. No significant differences (P = 1.000) were found between the ATTUNE S+ cement-in-cement and ATTUNE S+ group.

CONCLUSION

Based on these results, we found no design-specific evidence of increased debonding risk with the ATTUNE and ATTUNE S+ components compared with the P.F.C Sigma. Furthermore, the cement-in-cement revision seems to be an alternative for the revision surgery.

Loading on Attune® fixed-bearing cruciate-substituting total knee implant in knee malalignment during activities of daily living: A finite element analysis

Purpose

To compare contact stresses between Attune® and PFC Sigma® total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants in the presence of knee malalignment.

Methods

Maximum contact stress after finite element analysis were compared during standing, walking, and stair climbing in 0°, 2.5° and 5°varus/valgus knee alignments.

Results

The percentage increase in contact stress was highest during walking with PFC Sigma® in 5° varus (238.5%), standing with Attune® in 5° valgus (127.2%), and standing with Attune® in 2.5° valgus (107.8%).

Conclusion

The newer Attune® design may be associated with higher maximum contact stresses and increased risk of wear and implant failure.