Management of autoimmune haemolytic anaemia in low-to-middle income countries: current challenges and the way forward

Autoimmune haemolytic anaemias

Adult autoimmune haemolytic anaemias (AIHAs) include different subtypes of a rare autoimmune disease in which autoantibodies targeting autoantigens expressed on the membrane of autologous red blood cells (RBCs) are produced, leading to their accelerated destruction. In the presence of haemolytic anaemia, the direct antiglobulin test is the cornerstone of AIHA diagnosis. AIHAs are classified according to the isotype and the thermal optimum of the autoantibody into warm (wAIHAs), cold and mixed AIHAs. wAIHAs, the most frequent type of AIHAs, are associated with underlying conditions in ~50% of cases. In wAIHA, IgG autoantibody reacts with autologous RBCs at 37 °C, leading to antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity and increased phagocytosis of RBCs in the spleen. Cold AIHAs include cold agglutinin disease (CAD) and cold agglutinin syndrome (CAS) when there is an underlying condition. CAD and cold agglutinin syndrome are IgM cold antibody-driven AIHAs characterized by classical complement pathway-mediated haemolysis. The management of wAIHAs has long been based around corticosteroids and splenectomy and on symptomatic measures and non-specific cytotoxic agents for CAD. Rituximab and the development of complement inhibitors, such as the anti-C1s antibody sutimlimab, have changed the therapeutic landscape of AIHAs, and new promising targeted therapies are under investigation.

The impact of individual clinical features in cold agglutinin disease: hemolytic versus non-hemolytic symptoms

INTRODUCTION

During the last decades, the pathogenesis of cold agglutinin disease (CAD) has been well elucidated and shown to be complex. Several documented or investigational therapies have been made available. This development has resulted in major therapeutic advances, but also in challenges in choice of therapy.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we address each step in pathogenesis: bone marrow clonal lymphoproliferation, composition and effects of monoclonal cold agglutinin, non-complement mediated erythrocyte agglutination, complement-dependent hemolysis, and other effects of complement activation. We also discuss the heterogeneous clinical features and their relation to specific steps in pathogenesis, in particular with respect to the impact of complement involvement. CAD can be classified into three clinical phenotypes with consequences for established treatments as well as development of new therapies. Some promising future treatment approaches - beyond chemoimmunotherapy and complement inhibition - are reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

The patient's individual clinical profile regarding complement involvement and hemolytic versus non-hemolytic features is important for the choice of treatment. Further development of treatment approaches is encouraged, and some candidate drugs are promising irrespective of clinical phenotype. Patients with CAD requiring therapy should be considered for inclusion in clinical trials.

Current challenges of blood transfusions in patients with thalassemia in India and future perspectives

The introduction of regular red blood cell transfusions transformed thalassemia major from a fatal childhood disease into a chronic disorder. Thalassemia is highly prevalent in South Asia, including the Indian subcontinent, and blood transfusion remains the cornerstone of management for these patients. But safe blood transfusions still remain a major problem in India. Difficulties in maintaining adequate blood inventory, a lack of a national blood act, and fragmented blood transfusion services are some of the major contributing factors for the delay in blood supply. In most of the blood centers, alloantibody detection facilities and extended red cell antigen typing are unavailable. Awareness is the key to reducing alloimmunization, which limits the effectiveness of transfusions and the potential availability of blood. Patients with thalassemia are also at high risk of transfusion-transmitted infections unless appropriate blood screening is in place. Hence, many patients remain under-transfused, resulting in decreased health and quality-of-life outcomes. Facilities such as leucoreduction and immunohematological monitoring following a blood transfusion are often lacking in India, especially at the sub-district level. Continuous efforts to raise community awareness, regular training of health-care workers, and proper utilization of available resources are essential to ensuring safe blood transfusions for patients with thalassemia. Access to the new treatments at an affordable cost may reduce the blood transfusion burden for thalassemia patients in India.

A national survey of current immunohematologic testing practices for the diagnosis of autoimmune hemolytic anemia in India

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a common term for several disorders that differ from one another in terms of etiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatment. Management of patients with AIHA has become increasingly evidence-based in recent years. While this development has resulted in therapeutic improvements, it also carries increased requirements for optimal diagnosis using more advanced laboratory tests. Unfortunately, limited data are available from developing countries regarding the testing and transfusion management of patients with AIHA. The main objective of this survey was to explore the current immunohematologic testing practices for the diagnosis of AIHA in India. This online survey consisted of 30 questions, covering the place of work, the number of AIHA cases encountered in the 3 preceding years, testing method(s), transfusion management, and so forth. Individuals representing 89 laboratories completed the survey; only 78 of which responded that AIHA testing was performed in their facility's laboratory. The majority of respondents agreed that the most commonly affected age-group comprised individuals of older than 20 years, with a female preponderance. Regarding transfusion management, respondents indicated that transfusion with "best-match" red blood cell units remains the most common practice. Column-agglutination technology is used by 92 percent of respondents as the primary testing method. Although a monospecific direct antiglobulin test is available at 73 percent of the sites, most of them have limited access to other resources that could diagnose cold or mixed AIHA. Merely 49 percent of responding laboratories have the resources to perform adsorption studies for the detection of alloantibodies. Furthermore, three-cell antibody screening reagents are unavailable at 32 percent of laboratories. In 72 percent of centers, clinical hematologists would prefer to consult a transfusion medicine specialist before administering treatment to AIHA patients. There is unanimous agreement regarding the need for a national registry. The survey data indicate wide variability in testing practices for patients with AIHA in India. Future studies are needed to focus on the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of different testing strategies for developing countries.