Development of a multiplex RT-PCR assay and statistical evaluation of its use in forensic identification of vaginal fluid

A rapid identification system for vaginal fluid stains based on nested recombinant polymerase amplification and lateral flow dipstick

In forensic practice, identifying the species of unknown bodily fluid stains can provide assistance in the qualitative analysis and investigation of cases, and vaginal fluid stains, as one of the common bodily fluid stains, are most commonly seen at the scene of sexual assault. At present, the commonly used vaginal peptidase or microscopic detection methods currently have drawbacks such as high false negative rates, poor sensitivity, and high requirements for sample integrity and background color. However, in forensic investigations, the test materials have specificity and scarcity, making it difficult to ensure their quantity and quality. Thus, in order to achieve rapid and sensitive detection of vaginal fluid stains, in this study, we combined nested PCR and isothermal amplification technology to construct a rapid detection system for suspicious vaginal fluid stains using lateral flow dipstick. This system achieves detection by detecting the specific marker microbial community Lactobacillus crispatus in vaginal fluid, and has a high sensitivity and accuracy, which can achieve detection at template quantities as low as 2.31 copies. More importantly, the system can achieve detection at a constant temperature of 37 °C without the need for complex instruments. It can provide rapid and sensitive identification results, providing assistance for subsequent forensic material extraction and individual identification.

Quantitative evaluation of endometrium-expressed mRNAs for the purpose of discriminating between menstruation and traumatic vaginal injury in sexual assault cases

In sexual assault cases, it is crucial to discriminate between peripheral blood and menstrual blood to provide evidence for vaginal intercourse with traumatic injury. In this study, the menstrual blood mRNA markers progestagen-associated endometrial protein (PAEP), matrix metallopeptidase 7 (MMP7), and left-right determination factor 2 (LEFTY2) were evaluated by quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) for the discrimination of menstrual blood from peripheral blood and vaginal fluid. As a result, all markers with cutoff delta cycle quantification (ΔCq) values were specifically determined in menstrual blood among forensically relevant body fluids. Even though the changes in the expression levels of each marker differed during the menstrual cycle, all markers were determined to be positive in most of the randomly collected menstrual blood samples that were analyzed. Additionally, the markers with proposed cutoff ΔCq values could discriminate between menstrual blood and peripheral blood-mixed vaginal fluid samples. The determination of positive markers was less affected by storage temperature under dry conditions than under wet conditions, while PAEP was detectable in samples stored below room temperature under wet conditions. The detectability of PAEP was considered to be the result of its higher expression level compared with MMP7 and LEFTY2. In conclusion, menstrual blood markers for the RT-qPCR procedure evaluated in this study were highly specific for menstrual blood. The proposed procedure could be useful for discriminating between menstruation and traumatic bleeding in the female genital tract. In particular, PAEP is expected to be applicable to forensic casework samples because of its high specificity and robustness.

Partial validation of multiplexed real-time quantitative PCR assays for forensic body fluid identification

Confirmatory body fluid identification using messenger RNA (mRNA) is a well-established technique to address issues encountered with conventional testing - such as poor sensitivity, specificity, and a lack of available tests for all body fluids of interest. For over a decade, endpoint reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays have been used in forensic casework for such purposes. However, in comparison with real-time quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR), endpoint RT-PCR has lower sensitivity, precision, and linear dynamic range. This research details the multiplexing and partial validation of confirmatory RT-qPCR assays. We have previously described novel assays for a range of body fluid targets and identified an optimal commercial kit for their amplification. Here, multiplexing was undertaken to form three assays: circulatory blood (SLC4A1) and menstrual fluid (STC1), saliva (HTN3) and vaginal material (CYP2B7P), and spermatozoa (PRM1) and seminal fluid (KLK2), all including a synthetic internal control RNA. Partial validation of the multiplexed assays incorporated the MIQE guidelines, ISO requirements, and SWGDAM guidelines. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, each marker was significantly different from an uninformative assay and optimal cut-offs were all above 35 cycles. All assays showed a wide LDR (ranging from 3 to 5 logs with most R2 > 0.99), and high precision (most mean CV < 1 %). STC1 showed some instances of sporadic expression in blood, semen, and vaginal material at high CT values. CYP2B7P showed off-target expression in semen and blood. The sensitivities were approximated as; saliva: 1 in 1,000 dilution of a whole buccal swab, circulatory blood: 0.01-0.1 µL blood, menstrual fluid: 1 in 10,000 dilution of a whole menstrual swab, spermatozoa: 0.001 µL semen, seminal fluid: 0.01 µL semen, and vaginal material: 1 in 1,000 dilution of a whole vaginal swab. A total of 16 mock body fluid extract mixtures and 18 swab mixtures were tested and had 100% and 99% detection of target markers below each specific cut-off, respectively. Some mixtures containing high volumes of blood and semen showed off-target CYP2B7P expression. The successful application of a probabilistic model to the RT-qPCR data was also demonstrated. Further work will involve full developmental validation.

Current Methods for Body Fluid Identification Related to Sexual Crime: Focusing on Saliva, Semen, and Vaginal Fluid

Although, DNA typing plays a decisive role in the identification of persons from blood and body fluid stains in criminal investigations, clarifying the origin of extracted DNA has also been considered an essential task in proving a criminal act. This review introduces the importance of developing precise methods for body fluid identification. Body fluid identification has long relied on enzymatic methods as a presumptive assay and histological or serological methods as a confirmatory assay. However, because the latest DNA typing methods can rapidly obtain results from very small and even old, poorly preserved samples, the development of a novel corresponding body fluid identification method is required. In particular, an immunochromatographic method has been introduced to identify saliva and semen from sexual crimes. In addition, for vaginal fluid identification, attempts have been made in the past decade to introduce a method relying on body fluid-specific mRNA expression levels. At present, the development of molecular biological methods involving microRNA, DNA methylation, and resident bacterial DNA is ongoing. Therefore, in criminal investigations, body fluid identification is an essential task for correctly applying the results of DNA typing, although further research and development are required.

A Proposed Procedure for Discriminating between Nasal Secretion and Saliva by RT-qPCR

In forensic casework, nasal secretion can be a good source of DNA. Moreover, saliva can prove useful in cases of sexual assault. However, discriminating between these body fluids is often difficult because of cross-reactivity between them on presumptive and confirmatory tests. Therefore, an RT-qPCR procedure was developed to discriminate between nasal secretion and saliva. Characteristic genes in nasal secretion and/or saliva (BPIFA1, STATH, HTN3, and PRH2) were selected as candidates. Discrimination criteria were established based on the expression levels of these markers in various body fluids. In addition, a flowchart was proposed and used to discriminate among nasal secretion, saliva, and other body fluids in various forensic samples. BPIFA1 was highly expressed in nasal secretion but was also expressed in saliva, semen, and vaginal fluid at trace levels. STATH was expressed in nasal secretion and saliva but not in other body fluids. HTN3 was specifically expressed in most of the saliva samples, as reported previously. Unexpectedly, PRH2 was expressed in only a few saliva samples. Using the proposed criteria and flowchart, nasal secretion and saliva were successfully discriminated among the various body fluids tested. The developed procedure could be useful in forensic casework.