Preclinical and clinical experience with dasatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-negative leukemias and myeloid disorders

Mechanisms, monitoring, and management of tyrosine kinase inhibitors-associated cardiovascular toxicities

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) drug class is a prominently used option in the treatment of various cancers. Safety evaluation of these drugs has shown evidence of cardiotoxicity of varying frequency and severity between agents; concern has led to updated labeling, warning prescribers of such. This review seeks to clarify the present dangers and investigate cardiotoxic mechanisms of action for each discussed TKI. Dasatinib was connected primarily with an incidence of fluid retention, edema, QT prolongation, and pulmonary hypertension in clinical studies. It is theorized that this is due to a combination of off-target kinase binding and on-target binding of Bcr-Abl, and less likely, mitochondrial induced apoptosis. Studies showed sorafenib to carry the risk of hypertension, QT prolongation, and myocardial infarction. Proposed mechanisms for these side effects include inhibition of proteins, vascular endothelium growth factor receptor, hERG potassium channels, and the RAF/MERK/ERK pro-survival pathway. Finally, lapatinib showed evidence of decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and QT prolongation in clinical studies. The literature attributes these as side effects of on-target ErbB2 binding leading to mitochondrial induced apoptosis. The concern warranted by these findings is in question. Pooled safety data suggest that the overall risk for cardiotoxicity is minimal in dasatinib and lapatinib. Sorafenib seems to carry a moderate concern. For the discussed agents, recommendations agree that routine monitoring via methods such as electroencephalogram, cardiac biomarkers, and blood pressure is warranted during the course of treatment, in addition to a comprehensive collection of past medical history and risk factors to identify those at heightened risk for cardiovascular events.

Platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFRs) fusion genes involvement in hematological malignancies

PURPOSE

To investigate oncogenic platelet-derived growth factor receptor(PDGFR) fusion genes involvement in hematological malignancies, the advances in the PDGFR fusion genes diagnosis and development of PDGFR fusions inhibitors.

METHODS

Literature search was done using terms "PDGFR and Fusion" or "PDGFR and Myeloid neoplasm" or 'PDGFR and Lymphoid neoplasm' or "PDGFR Fusion Diagnosis" or "PDGFR Fusion Targets" in databases including PubMed, ASCO.org, and Medscape.

RESULTS

Out of the 36 fusions detected, ETV6(TEL)-PDGFRB and FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusions were frequently detected, 33 are as a result of chromosomal translocation, FIP1L1-PDGFRA and EBF1-PDGFRB are the result of chromosomal deletion and CDK5RAP2- PDGFRΑ is the result of chromosomal insertion. Seven of the 34 rare fusions have detectable reciprocals.

CONCLUSION

RNA aptamers are promising therapeutic target of PDGFRs and diagnostic tools of PDGFRs fusion genes. Also, PDGFRs have variable prospective therapeutic strategies including small molecules, RNA aptamers, and interference therapeutics as well as development of adaptor protein Lnk mimetic drugs.

[FIP1L1-PDGFRА-positive myeloproliferative disease with eosinophilia: A rare case with multiple organ dysfunction and a response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy]

The described case of FIP1L1-PDGFRА-positive myeloproliferative disease is characterized by an atypical aggressive course to develop severe specific complications as injuries to the brain, heart, lung, and intestine. Pathogenetic therapy with imatinib could stabilize a patient's state, but failed to produce a complete hematological response. Switching from imatinib to dasatinib could produce sustained clinical, hematological, and molecular remissions.

Evidence for the persistence of an active endogenous retrovirus (ERVE) in humans

Transposable elements (TEs) account for nearly half (44 %) of the human genome. However, their overall activity has been steadily declining over the past 35-50 million years, so that <0.05 % of TEs are presumably still "alive" (potentially transposable) in human populations. All the active elements are retrotransposons, either autonomous (LINE-1 and possibly the endogenous retrovirus ERVK), or non-autonomous (Alu and SVA, whose transposition is dependent on the LINE-1 enzymatic machinery). Here we show that a lineage of the endogenous retrovirus ERVE was recently engaged in ectopic recombination events and may have at least one potentially fully functional representative, initially reported as a novel retrovirus isolated from blood cells of a Chinese patient with chronic myeloid leukemia, which bears signals of positive selection on its envelope region. Altogether, there is strong evidence that ERVE should be included in the short list of potentially active TEs, and we give clues on how to identify human specific insertions of this element that are likely to be segregating in some of our populations.

FOXM1 (Forkhead box M1) in tumorigenesis: overexpression in human cancer, implication in tumorigenesis, oncogenic functions, tumor-suppressive properties, and target of anticancer therapy

FOXM1 (Forkhead box M1) is a typical proliferation-associated transcription factor and is also intimately involved in tumorigenesis. FOXM1 stimulates cell proliferation and cell cycle progression by promoting the entry into S-phase and M-phase. Additionally, FOXM1 is required for proper execution of mitosis. In accordance with its role in stimulation of cell proliferation, FOXM1 exhibits a proliferation-specific expression pattern and its expression is regulated by proliferation and anti-proliferation signals as well as by proto-oncoproteins and tumor suppressors. Since these factors are often mutated, overexpressed, or lost in human cancer, the normal control of the foxm1 expression by them provides the basis for deregulated FOXM1 expression in tumors. Accordingly, FOXM1 is overexpressed in many types of human cancer. FOXM1 is intimately involved in tumorigenesis, because it contributes to oncogenic transformation and participates in tumor initiation, growth, and progression, including positive effects on angiogenesis, migration, invasion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, metastasis, recruitment of tumor-associated macrophages, tumor-associated lung inflammation, self-renewal capacity of cancer cells, prevention of premature cellular senescence, and chemotherapeutic drug resistance. However, in the context of urethane-induced lung tumorigenesis, FOXM1 has an unexpected tumor suppressor role in endothelial cells because it limits pulmonary inflammation and canonical Wnt signaling in epithelial lung cells, thereby restricting carcinogenesis. Accordingly, FOXM1 plays a role in homologous recombination repair of DNA double-strand breaks and maintenance of genomic stability, that is, prevention of polyploidy and aneuploidy. The implication of FOXM1 in tumorigenesis makes it an attractive target for anticancer therapy, and several antitumor drugs have been reported to decrease FOXM1 expression.