Successful treatment with a modified bortezomib schedule of weekly and longer intervals for patients with refractory/resistance multiple myeloma

Once-weekly versus twice-weekly bortezomib in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a real-world analysis

Induction regimens for multiple myeloma (MM) commonly include bortezomib, which has typically been administered twice weekly despite studies demonstrating comparable efficacy and less peripheral neuropathy (PN) with once-weekly bortezomib. We aimed to analyze the real-world prevalence and efficacy of once-weekly versus twice-weekly bortezomib regimens in newly diagnosed MM. We analyzed 2497 US patients aged 18-70 years treated with commercial first-line bortezomib using nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived data, including 910 (36.4%) patients who received twice-weekly and 1522 (63.2%) who received once-weekly bortezomib. Once-weekly bortezomib use increased over time, from 57.7% in 2017 to 73.1% in 2022. Multivariate analysis identified worsened performance status and more recent year of diagnosis with higher odds of receiving once-weekly bortezomib. Real-world progression-free survival (median 37.2 months with once-weekly versus 39.6 months with twice-weekly, p = 0.906) and overall survival (medians not reached in either cohort, p = 0.800) were comparable. PN rates were higher in patients receiving twice-weekly bortezomib (34.7% versus 18.5%, p < 0.001). In conclusion, once-weekly bortezomib is clearly associated with similar efficacy and fewer toxicities compared to twice-weekly bortezomib. Our findings support once-weekly bortezomib as a standard-of-care regimen for newly diagnosed patients with MM.

Population-based meta-analysis of bortezomib exposure-response relationships in multiple myeloma patients

Bortezomib (Velcade®) is a reversible proteasome inhibitor that shows potent antineoplastic activity, by inhibiting the constitutively increased proteasome activity in myeloma cells, and is approved as a first-line therapy for multiple myeloma (MM). Although clinically successful, bortezomib exhibits a relatively narrow therapeutic index and can induce dose-limiting toxicities such as thrombocytopenia. This study aims to develop a quantitative and predictive pharmacodynamic model to investigate bortezomib dosing-regimens in a rational and efficient manner. Mean temporal profiles of bortezomib pharmacokinetics, proteasome activity, M-protein concentrations, and platelet counts following bortezomib monotherapy were extracted from published clinical studies. A population-based meta-analysis of bortezomib anti-myeloma activity and thrombocytopenia was conducted sequentially with a Stochastic Approximation Expectation Maximization algorithm in Monolix. The final pharmacodynamic model integrates drug-target interactions and cell signaling dynamics with temporal biomarkers of clinical efficacy and toxicity. Bortezomib pharmacokinetics, disease progression, and platelet dynamic profiles were well characterized in MM patients, and a local sensitivity analysis of the final model suggests that increased proteasome concentration could ultimately attenuate bortezomib antineoplastic activity in MM patients. In addition, model simulations confirm that a once-weekly dosing schedule represents an optimal therapeutic regimen with comparable antineoplastic activity but significantly reduced risk of thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, a pharmacodynamic model was successfully developed, which provides a quantitative, mechanism-based platform for probing bortezomib dosing-regimens. Further research is needed to determine whether this model could be used to individualize bortezomib regimens to maximize antineoplastic efficacy and minimize thrombocytopenia during MM treatment.

Efficacy and safety of bortezomib in refractory lupus nephritis: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Resistant lupus nephritis (LN) has been associated with the persistence of long-lived plasma cells. Preliminary studies identified bortezomib as a potential treatment option for patients with refractory LN. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of bortezomib in the treatment of severe refractory LN.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 12 female patients diagnosed for the first time with class IV or IV/V LN with acute or rapidly progressive kidney injury (n = 11) and/or severe nephrotic syndrome (n = 1) who showed resistance to induction therapy with cyclophosphamide, steroids, mycophenolate, and rituximab, and were treated with either intravenous or subcutaneous bortezomib plus intravenous dexamethasone.

RESULTS

All patients with acute or rapidly progressive kidney injury showed a significant reduction in both biochemical and immunological activity after a mean of 6 (minimum 5, maximum 7) weekly cycles of bortezomib regimen, with a significant increase in C3 levels and a significant decrease of anti-ds DNA antibody titers, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score, serum creatinine, and proteinuria. One patient (8.3%) achieved a complete response, and 10 patients (83.4%) achieved a partial response. During follow-up, all these patients maintained partial responses under treatment with mycophenolate and low-dose glucocorticoids. The patient with refractory nephrotic syndrome showed a partial response but relapsed 11 months after the end of bortezomib treatment and was resistant to treatment. A significant decrease in serum IgG levels after initiation of bortezomib treatment was observed in all patients, five of them (41.6%) showed hypogammaglobulinemia (<500 mg/dl), but no patient suffered from opportunistic infections; in only two patients (16.6%) hypogammaglobulinemia persisted at the end of follow-up. Two patients (16.6%) suffered from sensory neuropathy, which led to bortezomib treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Bortezomib may be an effective option for refractory LN, but close monitoring must be performed for possible adverse events such as peripheral neuropathy and hypogammaglobulinemia.

Dose Adjustment Helps Obtain Better Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma Patients with Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisolone (VMP) Treatment

Objective

Multiple myeloma (MM) has a better survival outcome because of the development of drugs. However, equivalent outcomes cannot be expected from the same drug. Therefore, how the treatment schedule is managed is important. We analyzed VMP (bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisolone) data to determine an effective treatment strategy.

Materials and Methods

We collected the data of 59 patients who were newly diagnosed with MM from January 2012 to April 2017 using electronic medical records. We analyzed baseline characteristics, responses, dose reductions, and survival.

Results

The overall response rate was 86.5% [complete response (CR): 32.2%, very good partial response (VGPR): 37.3%]. The median progression-free survival was 33.6 months and the 5-year overall survival rate was 70%. There were significant better progression-free survival outcomes between CR and non-CR for each of the 4 cycles. Of the four patients who achieved CR after the first cycle, none have had disease progression as of yet. We divided patients into two groups according to the median dose (52.1 mg/m²) and we found no differences between the high-dose and low-dose groups. About 78% of patients completed 9-cycle schedules and 84% patients experienced dose reduction, mostly for reasons of non-hematologic toxicities.

Conclusion

Active dose reduction helped to continue treatment and it increased the opportunity to be exposed to drugs. In the end, it resulted in improved outcome.

Proteasome inhibitors in cancer therapy: Treatment regimen and peripheral neuropathy as a side effect

Proteasomal system plays an important role in protein turnover, which is essential for homeostasis of cells. Besides degradation of oxidized proteins, it is involved in the regulation of many different signaling pathways. These pathways include mainly cell differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis, transcriptional activation and angiogenesis. Thus, proteasomal system is a crucial target for treatment of several diseases including neurodegenerative diseases, cystic fibrosis, atherosclerosis, autoimmune diseases, diabetes and cancer. Over the last fifteen years, proteasome inhibitors have been tested to highlight their mechanisms of action and used in the clinic to treat different types of cancer. Proteasome inhibitors are mainly used in combinational therapy along with classical chemo-radiotherapy. Several studies have proved their significant effects but serious side effects such as peripheral neuropathy, limits their use in required effective doses. Recent studies focus on peripheral neuropathy as the primary side effect of proteasome inhibitors. Therefore, it is important to delineate the underlying mechanisms of peripheral neuropathy and develop new inhibitors according to obtained data. This review will detail the role of proteasome inhibition in cancer therapy and development of peripheral neuropathy as a side effect. Additionally, new approaches to prevent treatment-limiting side effects will be discussed in order to help researchers in developing effective strategies to overcome side effects of proteasome inhibitors.

Bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisolone combination chemotherapy for newly diagnosed light chain (AL) amyloidosis

Bortezomib combination chemotherapy appears to be active in light chain (AL) amyloidosis with high rates of hematologic and organ response. We report a retrospective evaluation of the clinical outcome of treatment with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisolone (VMP) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with AL amyloidosis who were ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant. Among the 19 patients included in this study, 90% had two or more involved organs and most of the patients had advanced stage AL amyloidosis (84% with 2004 Mayo Stage III and 92% with 2012 Mayo Stage III or IV). Sixteen (84%) patients had a hematologic response, including seven (37%) with complete response, with time to response of 1-3 months. Cardiac and renal responses were observed in 44% and 33% of patients, respectively. Estimated 2-year survival is 39%, and 5 patients (26%) died during therapy. The common grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia, diarrhea and pneumonia. A once-weekly bortezomib is more feasible than twice-weekly regimen. Our results suggest that triplet regimen of VMP appears to be an effective regimen in advanced AL amyloidosis ,but benefits in the patients with multi-organ dysfunction remain to be proven.

Efficacy and safety of reduced-intensity induction therapy with a bortezomib-based regimen in elderly patients with multiple myeloma

The therapeutic effects of bortezomib in untreated and refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma have been demonstrated in several clinical trials, displaying superiority to the conventional treatments. However, many treatment-related toxicities, such as bone marrow suppression, infections and peripheral neuropathy, are well known and lead to treatment discontinuation and dose modification, especially in elderly patients. The purpose of this review is to summarize the published literature concerning the efficacy and safety of reduced-intensity induction therapy with bortezomib-based regimens in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. We used the VISTA trial as a reference and compared it with the seven trials identified in a systematic search. The data suggest that low-dose bortezomib significantly reduces therapy-related toxicities, especially neuropathy, and decreases the rate of discontinuation compared with the twice-weekly regimen, without losing efficacy. In light of this review, we suggest that once-weekly infusion of bortezomib in addition to melphalan-prednisone may be considered as a new standard of care in frontline treatment of elderly patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma.

Once- versus twice-weekly Bortezomib induction therapy with dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

In this study, we administered a modified schedule of weekly intravenous Bortezomib at 1.6 mg/m(2) with dexamethasone (BD) and compared it to the standard 1.3 mg/m(2) twice-weekly BD regimen in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). We assessed the difference in efficacy, safety profile and survival between the once-weekly and twice-weekly cohorts (13 vs. 24 patients). The over response rate was similar with both arms of the study, being 77% in the once-weekly schedule and 74.9% in the twice-weekly schedule (P=0.690). The median overall survival was not reached in either schedule. Also, the median progression-free survival and duration of response of the once-weekly schedule did not significantly differ from those of the twice-weekly schedule (8 months vs.10 months, P=0.545 and 6 months vs.7 months, P=0.467 respectively). Peripheral sensory neuropathy and grade 3/4 hematologic toxic effects were more frequently reported in the twice-weekly schedule than the once-weekly schedule, but there was no statistically significant difference. This preliminary experience in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed MM indicated that once-weekly infusion of Bortezomib plus dexamethasone may improve safety without affecting outcome.