Global real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction detecting proto-oncogenes associated with 14q32 chromosomal translocation as a valuable marker for predicting survival in multiple myeloma

The role and regulation of Maf proteins in cancer

The Maf proteins (Mafs) belong to basic leucine zipper transcription factors and are members of the activator protein-1 (AP-1) superfamily. There are two subgroups of Mafs: large Mafs and small Mafs, which are involved in a wide range of biological processes, such as the cell cycle, proliferation, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Therefore, dysregulation of Mafs can affect cell fate and is closely associated with diverse diseases. Accumulating evidence has established both large and small Mafs as mediators of tumor development. In this review, we first briefly describe the structure and physiological functions of Mafs. Then we summarize the upstream regulatory mechanisms that control the expression and activity of Mafs. Furthermore, we discuss recent studies on the critical role of Mafs in cancer progression, including cancer proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis, tumor/stroma interaction and angiogenesis. We also review the clinical implications of Mafs, namely their potential possibilities and limitations as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in cancer.

Efficacy and safety of modified BLd therapy for Japanese patients with transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma

The BLd regimen, which is a triplet regimen of bortezomib (Bor), lenalidomide (Len), and dexamethasone (Dex), is effective against newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). However, non-hematological toxicities, such as peripheral neuropathy (PN), often hamper long-term continuation of the regimen, particularly in older adult patients. In this study, we examined the efficacy and safety of the modified BLd regimen with reduced-intensity Bor and standard-dose Len. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of 1.3 mg/m² Bor administered subcutaneously on days 1 and 8, 25 mg Len administered on days 1-14, and 20 mg Dex on days 1-2 and 8-9 of a 3 week cycle for 8 cycles, followed by a 4 week cycle of Dex (40 mg weekly). Among the 30 patients enrolled, 60.0% (95% CI 40.6-77.3) had a very good partial response or better, and the best overall response rate was 96.7% (95% CI 82.8-99.9). Eight patients (26.7%) achieved a complete response. Grade 3 or higher PN was not observed and hematological toxicity was the most common adverse event. The modified BLd regimen showed favorable efficacy with a manageable safety profile, which suggests it could be a treatment option for transplant-ineligible NDMM.

The Prognostic Role of Cyclin D1 in Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: Cyclin D1 has been identified as a proto-oncogene associated with the uncontrolled proliferation of tumor cells. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to estimate the prognostic significance of cyclin D1 in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Method: We searched for qualified data in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to February 2020. Data quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to evaluate the relationship between cyclin D1 expression and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS)/event-free survival (EFS) in patients with MM. Result: A total of 13 studies involving 961 patients were included. Overall, pooled analysis revealed significant heterogeneity between cyclin D1 expression and the prognosis of MM (OS, HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.71-1.64, I2 = 67.9%; PFS/EFS, HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.49-1.93, I2 = 85.8%). Subgroup analysis revealed that the prolongation of OS was relevant to increased expression of cyclin D1 in MM patients in the relapsed and refractory group (OS, HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.24-0.90). Another subgroup assessment of OS established that MM patients with CCND1 overexpression in the bortezomib group had longer survival time (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11-0.82), whereas, those overexpressing CCND1 in the conventional chemotherapy group had poor prognosis (HR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.18-4.08). We also found that increased cyclin D1 expression correlated favorably with PFS in the autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.28-0.73) or reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) group (HR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.26-0.64). Conclusion: The result of this meta-analysis suggested that CCND1 overexpression might be a predictive biomarker for MM patients when treated with bortezomib, receiving ASCT, or in relapsed and refractory period.

Machine Learning Applicability for Classification of PAD/VCD Chemotherapy Response Using 53 Multiple Myeloma RNA Sequencing Profiles

Multiple myeloma (MM) affects ~500,000 people and results in ~100,000 deaths annually, being currently considered treatable but incurable. There are several MM chemotherapy treatment regimens, among which eleven include bortezomib, a proteasome-targeted drug. MM patients respond differently to bortezomib, and new prognostic biomarkers are needed to personalize treatments. However, there is a shortage of clinically annotated MM molecular data that could be used to establish novel molecular diagnostics. We report new RNA sequencing profiles for 53 MM patients annotated with responses on two similar chemotherapy regimens: bortezomib, doxorubicin, dexamethasone (PAD), and bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone (VCD), or with responses to their combinations. Fourteen patients received both PAD and VCD; six received only PAD, and 33 received only VCD. We compared profiles for the good and poor responders and found five genes commonly regulated here and in the previous datasets for other bortezomib regimens (all upregulated in the good responders): FGFR3, MAF, IGHA2, IGHV1-69, and GRB14. Four of these genes are linked with known immunoglobulin locus rearrangements. We then used five machine learning (ML) methods to build a classifier distinguishing good and poor responders for two cohorts: PAD + VCD (53 patients), and separately VCD (47 patients). We showed that the application of FloWPS dynamic data trimming was beneficial for all ML methods tested in both cohorts, and also in the previous MM bortezomib datasets. However, the ML models build for the different datasets did not allow cross-transferring, which can be due to different treatment regimens, experimental profiling methods, and MM heterogeneity.

Metabolic Effects of Recurrent Genetic Aberrations in Multiple Myeloma

Oncogene activation and malignant transformation exerts energetic, biosynthetic and redox demands on cancer cells due to increased proliferation, cell growth and tumor microenvironment adaptation. As such, altered metabolism is a hallmark of cancer, which is characterized by the reprogramming of multiple metabolic pathways. Multiple myeloma (MM) is a genetically heterogeneous disease that arises from terminally differentiated B cells. MM is characterized by reciprocal chromosomal translocations that often involve the immunoglobulin loci and a restricted set of partner loci, and complex chromosomal rearrangements that are associated with disease progression. Recurrent chromosomal aberrations in MM result in the aberrant expression of MYC, cyclin D1, FGFR3/MMSET and MAF/MAFB. In recent years, the intricate mechanisms that drive cancer cell metabolism and the many metabolic functions of the aforementioned MM-associated oncogenes have been investigated. Here, we discuss the metabolic consequences of recurrent chromosomal translocations in MM and provide a framework for the identification of metabolic changes that characterize MM cells.

Randomised phase II study to optimise melphalan, prednisolone, and bortezomib in untreated multiple myeloma (JCOG1105)

We conducted a randomised phase II study to determine the optimal dose and schedule of melphalan, prednisone, and bortezomib (MPB) (jRCTs031180097). Transplant‐ineligible untreated multiple myeloma patients were randomised to Arm A (twice weekly bortezomib in one six‐week cycle followed by eight five‐week cycles of four times once weekly bortezomib with melphalan and prednisolone on days 1–4) or Arm B (nine four‐week cycles of three times once weekly bortezomib with melphalan and prednisolone on days 1–4). The primary end‐point was complete response (CR) rate. Of 91 patients randomised to two arms, 88 were eligible. The median cumulative bortezomib doses were 45·8 and 35·1 mg/m², CR rate was 18·6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 8·4–33·4] and 6·7% (95% CI 1·4–18·3), and the median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 2·5 and 1·4 years in Arms A and B [hazard ratio (HR) 1·93 (95% CI 1·09–3·42)], respectively. Frequent grade ≥3 haematologic toxicities in Arms A and B were neutropenia (64·4% vs. 28·3%) and thrombocytopenia (35·6% vs. 10·9%). Grade 2/3 peripheral neuropathy was observed in 24·4/2·2% in Arm A and 8·7/0% in Arm B. In conclusion, Arm A was the more promising regimen, suggesting that the twice weekly schedule of bortezomib in the first cycle and higher cumulative dose of both bortezomib and melphalan influences the efficacy of modified MPB.

Impact of chromosomal abnormalities on the efficacy of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Lenalidomide is an effective therapeutic agent for multiple myeloma (MM). However, its efficacy in the context of chromosomal abnormalities (CA) is poorly understood. We retrospectively analyzed 83 patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM, who received lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Ld), in the context of CA. The median age and number of prior therapies were 69 and 2, respectively. Three, 11, 45, and 19 patients achieved complete response, very good partial response, partial response, and stable disease, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 11.1 and 38.8 months, respectively. Seventy-two patients were evaluated for frequently observed translocations; median PFS was 24.4 months in 20 patients with t(11;14), 13.0 months in 16 patients with t(4;14), and 3.7 months in seven patients with t(14;16). G-banded karyotype analysis detected 11 hypodiploid patients, who had shorter PFS and OS (2.5 and 6.2 months, respectively) compared to others (13.0 and 43.7 months, respectively). Hypodiploid patients showed poor clinical outcome, whereas patients with t(11;14) showed favorable outcome. In summary, the present study presents the clinical impact of chromosomal abnormalities on the outcome of Ld therapy, and contributes to understanding the appropriate choice of lenalidomide-based therapy to achieve effective treatment of RR MM.

Expression analysis of two SLAM family receptors, SLAMF2 and SLAMF7, in patients with multiple myeloma

Monoclonal antibodies against surface antigens on MM cells, such as anti-SLAMF7 and anti-CD38 antibodies, represent an attractive therapeutic modality for the eradication of multiple myeloma (MM) cells. However, further exploration of target molecules is urgently needed for the development of more effective therapies. In the present study, we studied the expression of CD48 in a total of 74 primary MM samples derived from patients to evaluate SLAMF2 (CD48) as a candidate in mAb therapy for MM. Of 74 samples, 39 were subjected to SLAMF7 analysis. Most of the MM cells, defined as CD38 and CD138 double-positive cells, showed strong expression of CD48 or SLAMF7 independent of disease stage or treatment history. In these 39 samples, most MM cells showed expression of both SLAMF7 and CD48; however, several samples showed expression of either only CD48 or only SLAMF7, including seven cases that were only highly positive for SLAMF7, and five that were only highly positive for CD48. Our study demonstrates that the immune receptor CD48 is overexpressed on MM cells together with SLAMF7, and that CD48 may be considered as an alternative target for treatment of MM in cases showing weak expression of SLAMF7.

Low expression of neural cell adhesion molecule, CD56, is associated with low efficacy of bortezomib plus dexamethasone therapy in multiple myeloma

Bortezomib (Btz) is an active agent used to treat multiple myeloma (MM). Not all patients who receive Btz-containing therapy show a favorable response. Interaction of cellular adhesion molecules with MM and bone marrow stromal cells is crucial for the survival of MM cells. However, little is known about the role of these molecules in the sensitivity of MM to Btz-containing therapy. Thus, we evaluated the correlation between the level of cellular adhesion molecules in MM cells and the efficacy of Btz plus dexamethasone (Bd) therapy. The expression of the neural cell adhesion molecule gene (NCAM, also known as CD56), ITGA4, CXCR4, and other genes were analyzed in 74 samples of primary MM cells collected from patients before they received Bd therapy. Of the eight genes tested, expression of NCAM was lower among patients who responded poorly to Bd therapy. In vitro expression of NCAM induced by transfection of MM cells enhanced their sensitivity to Btz treatment by causing accumulation of polyubiquitinated proteins. Our results indicate that expression of NCAM is associated with better response to Btz treatment and is a promising candidate biomarker for predicting response to therapies involving Btz.

Bortezomib plus dexamethasone vs thalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

A randomized phase II selection design study (JCOG0904) was carried out to evaluate the more promising regimen between bortezomib (Bor) plus dexamethasone (Dex; BD) and thalidomide (Thal) plus Dex (TD) in Bor and Thal‐naïve patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Patients ≥20 and <80 years old with a documented diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) who received one or more prior therapies were randomized to receive BD (Bor 1.3 mg/m²) or TD (Thal 200 mg/d). In both arms, 8 cycles of induction (3‐week cycle) were followed by maintenance phase (5‐week cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal. The primary end‐point was 1‐year progression‐free survival (PFS). Forty‐four patients were randomized and assigned to receive BD and TD (n = 22, each group). At a median follow‐up of 34.3 months, the 1‐year PFS in the BD and TD arms were 45.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 24.4%‐64.3%) and 31.8% (95% CI, 14.2%‐51.1%), respectively, and the overall response rates were 77.3% and 40.9%, respectively. The 3‐year overall survival (OS) was 70.0% (95% CI, 44.9%‐85.4%) in the BD, and 48.8% (95% CI, 25.1%‐69.0%) in the TD arm. Among grade 3/4 adverse events, thrombocytopenia (54.5% vs 0.0%) and sensory peripheral neuropathy (22.7% vs 9.1%) were more frequent in BD when compared with the TD arm. Patients treated with BD had better outcomes than those treated with TD with regard to 1‐year PFS and 3‐year OS. Thus, BD was prioritized over TD for further investigations in Bor and Thal‐naïve RRMM patients. (Clinical trial registration no. UMIN000003135.)