• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4611068)   Today's Articles (40)   Subscriber (49381)
For: Reckmann K, Traulsen I, Krieter J. Life Cycle Assessment of pork production: A data inventory for the case of Germany. Livest Sci 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
De Cuyper C, Van den Broeke A, Van Linden V, Leen F, Aluwé M, Van Meensel J, Millet S. The impact of slaughter weight and sex on the carbon footprint of pig feed intake. Animal 2024;18:101119. [PMID: 38518430 DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]  Open
2
Wu H, Liu Y, Dai C, Ye Y, Zhu H, Fang W. Life-cycle comparisons of economic and environmental consequences for pig production with four different models in China. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2024;31:21668-21686. [PMID: 38393572 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-32541-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
3
Zhang L, Mao Y, Chen Z, Hu X, Wang C, Lu C, Wang L. A systematic review of life-cycle GHG emissions from intensive pig farming: Accounting and mitigation. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024;907:168112. [PMID: 37884131 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
4
Zhang J, Luo Z, Li N, Yu Y, Cai M, Zheng L, Zhu F, Huang F, K Tomberlin J, Rehman KU, Yu Z, Zhang J. Cellulose-degrading bacteria improve conversion efficiency in the co-digestion of dairy and chicken manure by black soldier fly larvae. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2023;348:119156. [PMID: 37837764 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
5
Alba-Reyes Y, Barrera EL, Brito-Ibarra Y, Hermida-García FO. Life cycle environmental impacts of using food waste liquid fodder as an alternative for pig feeding in a conventional Cuban farm. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2023;858:159915. [PMID: 36343806 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
6
Tong B, Zhang L, Hou Y, Oenema O, Long W, Velthof G, Ma W, Zhang F. Lower pork consumption and technological change in feed production can reduce the pork supply chain environmental footprint in China. NATURE FOOD 2023;4:74-83. [PMID: 37118572 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-022-00640-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
7
Life Cycle Assessment Perspective for Sectoral Adaptation to Climate Change: Environmental Impact Assessment of Pig Production. LAND 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/land11060827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
8
Møller H, Samsonstuen S, Øverland M, Modahl IS, Olsen HF. Local non-food yeast protein in pig production - environmental impacts and land use efficiency. Livest Sci 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2022.104925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
9
Tradeoff analysis of the pork supply and food security under the influence of African swine fever and the COVID-19 outbreak in China. GEOGRAPHY AND SUSTAINABILITY 2022;3:32-43. [PMCID: PMC8813193 DOI: 10.1016/j.geosus.2022.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Revised: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
10
Lamnatou C, Ezcurra-Ciaurriz X, Chemisana D, Plà-Aragonés LM. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a food-production system in Spain: Iberian ham based on an extensive system. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2022;808:151900. [PMID: 34838553 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
11
Villavicencio-Gutiérrez MR, Rogers-Montoya NA, Martínez-Campos R, Gómez-Tenorio G, Martínez-Castañeda FE. The environmental performance of different pork production scenarios: a life cycle assessment study. Trop Anim Health Prod 2022;54:44. [PMID: 35015158 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-022-03045-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
12
Andretta I, Hickmann FMW, Remus A, Franceschi CH, Mariani AB, Orso C, Kipper M, Létourneau-Montminy MP, Pomar C. Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Production: Insights From a Systematic Review. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:750733. [PMID: 34778435 PMCID: PMC8578682 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.750733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]  Open
13
Dorca-Preda T, Mogensen L, Kristensen T, Knudsen MT. Environmental impact of Danish pork at slaughterhouse gate – a life cycle assessment following biological and technological changes over a 10-year period. Livest Sci 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
14
Rolim Pietramale RT, Caldara FR, Barbosa DK, da Rosa CO, Vanzela M, Pádua AB, Ruviaro CF. How much the reproductive losses of sows can be impacting the carbon footprint in swine production? Livest Sci 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
15
Nikkhah A, Van Haute S, Jovanovic V, Jung H, Dewulf J, Cirkovic Velickovic T, Ghnimi S. Life cycle assessment of edible insects (Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis larvae) as a future protein and fat source. Sci Rep 2021;11:14030. [PMID: 34234157 PMCID: PMC8263613 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93284-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]  Open
16
Liu X, Cai Z, Yuan Z. Environmental burdens of small-scale intensive pig production in China. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2021;770:144720. [PMID: 33517013 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/25/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
17
The Reduction of Crude Protein with the Supplementation of Amino Acids in the Diet Reduces the Environmental Impact of Growing Pigs Production Evaluated through Life Cycle Assessment. SUSTAINABILITY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/su13094815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
18
Sporchia F, Kebreab E, Caro D. Assessing the multiple resource use associated with pig feed consumption in the European Union. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2021;759:144306. [PMID: 33340862 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
19
Djekic I, Bozickovic I, Djordjevic V, Smetana S, Terjung N, Ilic J, Doroski A, Tomasevic I. Can we associate environmental footprints with production and consumption using Monte Carlo simulation? Case study with pork meat. JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE 2021;101:960-969. [PMID: 32748951 DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
20
Benavides PT, Cai H, Wang M, Bajjalieh N. Life-cycle analysis of soybean meal, distiller-dried grains with solubles, and synthetic amino acid-based animal feeds for swine and poultry production. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
21
Mazza L, Xiao X, Ur Rehman K, Cai M, Zhang D, Fasulo S, Tomberlin JK, Zheng L, Soomro AA, Yu Z, Zhang J. Management of chicken manure using black soldier fly (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) larvae assisted by companion bacteria. WASTE MANAGEMENT (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2020;102:312-318. [PMID: 31707320 DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
22
Arrieta EM, González AD. Energy and carbon footprints of chicken and pork from intensive production systems in Argentina. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2019;673:20-28. [PMID: 30981200 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2019] [Revised: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
23
Study on the Vertical Linkage of Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity Change of the Animal Husbandry Sector between China and Its Provinces. SUSTAINABILITY 2018. [DOI: 10.3390/su10072492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
24
McAuliffe G, Takahashi T, Mogensen L, Hermansen J, Sage C, Chapman D, Lee M. Environmental trade-offs of pig production systems under varied operational efficiencies. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION 2017;165:1163-1173. [PMID: 29104375 PMCID: PMC5589118 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2017] [Revised: 07/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/26/2017] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
25
Noya I, Aldea X, González-García S, M Gasol C, Moreira MT, Amores MJ, Marín D, Boschmonart-Rives J. Environmental assessment of the entire pork value chain in Catalonia - A strategy to work towards Circular Economy. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2017;589:122-129. [PMID: 28273595 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2017] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
26
Schneider VE, Marques RV, Bortolin TA, Cemin G, Santos GMD. Monitoring and assessment of surface water quality in Taquari-Antas Watershed, South Brazil-region with intensive pig farming. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT 2016;188:617. [PMID: 27738896 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5635-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/05/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
27
Noya I, Aldea X, Gasol CM, González-García S, Amores MJ, Colón J, Ponsá S, Roman I, Rubio MA, Casas E, Moreira MT, Boschmonart-Rives J. Carbon and water footprint of pork supply chain in Catalonia: From feed to final products. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2016;171:133-143. [PMID: 26861226 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2015] [Revised: 01/28/2016] [Accepted: 01/29/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
28
Towards a methodology to formulate sustainable diets for livestock: accounting for environmental impact in diet formulation. Br J Nutr 2016;115:1860-74. [DOI: 10.1017/s0007114516000763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
29
Mackenzie SG, Leinonen I, Ferguson N, Kyriazakis I. Accounting for uncertainty in the quantification of the environmental impacts of Canadian pig farming systems. J Anim Sci 2016;93:3130-43. [PMID: 26115299 DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]  Open
30
Reckmann K, Blank R, Traulsen I, Krieter J. Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of pork using different protein sources in pig feed. Arch Anim Breed 2016. [DOI: 10.5194/aab-59-27-2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]  Open
31
zu Ermgassen EK, Phalan B, Green RE, Balmford A. Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there's swill, there's a way. FOOD POLICY 2016;58:35-48. [PMID: 26949285 PMCID: PMC4750877 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2015] [Revised: 09/03/2015] [Accepted: 11/06/2015] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA