Maladie de Fabry: propositions d'ungroupe d'experts français concernant le diagnostic, le traitement et le suivi des patients

Do clinical guidelines facilitate or impede drivers of treatment in Fabry disease?

Background

Variable disease progression confounds accurate prognosis in Fabry disease. Evidence supports the long-term benefit of early intervention with disease-specific therapy, but current guidelines recommend treatment initiation based on signs that may present too late to avoid irreversible organ damage. Findings from the ‘PRoposing Early Disease Indicators for Clinical Tracking in Fabry Disease’ (PREDICT-FD) initiative included expert consensus on 27 early indicators of disease progression in Fabry disease and on drivers of and barriers to treatment initiation in Fabry disease. Here, we compared the PREDICT-FD indicators with guidance from the European Fabry Working Group and various national guidelines to identify differences in signs supporting treatment initiation and how guidelines themselves might affect initiation. Finally, anonymized patient histories were reviewed by PREDICT-FD experts to determine whether PREDICT-FD indicators supported earlier treatment than existing guidance.

Results

Current guidelines generally aligned with PREDICT-FD on indicators of renal involvement, but most lacked specificity regarding cardiac indicators. The prognostic significance of neurological indicators such as white matter lesions (excluded by PREDICT-FD) was questioned in some guidelines and excluded from most. Some PREDICT-FD patient-reported signs (e.g., febrile crises) did not feature elsewhere. Key drivers of treatment initiation in PREDICT-FD were: (A) male sex, young age, and clinical findings (e.g., severe pain, organ involvement), (B) improving clinical outcomes and preventing disease progression, and (C) a family history of Fabry disease (especially if outcomes were severe). All guidelines aligned with (A) and several advocated therapy for asymptomatic male patients. There was scant evidence of (B) in current guidance: for example, no countries mandated ancillary symptomatic therapy, and no guidance advocated familial screening with (C) when diagnosis was confirmed. Barriers were misdiagnosis and a lack of biomarkers to inform timing of treatment. Review of patient histories generally found equal or greater support for treatment initiation with PREDICT-FD indicators than with other guidelines and revealed that the same case and guideline criteria often yielded different treatment recommendations.

Conclusions

Wider adoption of PREDICT-FD indicators at a national level could promote earlier treatment in Fabry disease. Clearer, more concise guidance is needed to harmonize treatment initiation in Fabry disease internationally.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-022-02181-4.

Avascular necrosis of bilateral femoral heads in a patient with Fabry's disease

The underlying cause of avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head is often not apparent. We report the case of a 26 year old builder with a four month history of bilateral hip pain, and a diagnosis of bilateral femoral head avascular necrosis. Fabry's disease was identified as the probable cause. Since 2001, enzyme replacement therapy for Fabry's disease has become available, with a potential to influence the disease process, and this is of potential importance to clinicians treating AVN.

Therapeutic goals in the treatment of Fabry disease

PURPOSE

Fabry disease is a progressive multiorgan, multisystem disorder that is caused by a deficiency in the lysosomal enzyme α-galactosidase A. Serious renal, cardiac, and cerebrovascular involvement are responsible for much of the morbidity and premature mortality associated with Fabry disease, and neuropathic pain, gastrointestinal problems, and hypohidrosis negatively affect quality of life of patients with Fabry disease. Fabry disease is X-linked, but women are often symptomatic and may be as severely affected as men.

METHODS

We propose a series of therapeutic and symptomatic goals for use in setting the expectations of enzyme replacement therapy and for assessing the response to enzyme replacement therapy in the treatment of Fabry disease.

RESULTS

Enzyme replacement therapy has been available since 2001 and has been associated with benefit in clinical trials, including stabilization of kidney function, improvement of cardiac structure and function, reduction in severity of neuropathic pain, and improvement in gastrointestinal involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

The presentation of these therapeutic goals will aid in the evaluation of response to enzyme replacement therapy and be useful in establishing an overall management plan for individual patients.