Isolement et contention mécanique dans les soins psychiatriques : modalités de prescription, prise en charge et surveillance

[Isolation and mechanical restraint in psychiatry]

Since 2016, there has been a succession of legal texts aimed at framing the use of seclusion and mechanical restraint in psychiatric services. These legal evolutions are not without consequence on the practice of caregivers. We propose here a practical summary of this issue.

[Attitude of psychiatrists and psychiatry residents in Lebanon towards restraint and informed consent]

OBJECTIVES

Psychiatry differs from the rest of medical specialties by the unique character of its pathologies, which makes ethical reflection difficult, including the collection of informed consent and the use of restraint and the seclusion-room. This reflection can be affected by subjectivity and a variety of influences, hence the interest of studying the attitude of psychiatrists and residents in psychiatry in Lebanon with regard to restraint and informed consent.

METHODS

We collected data using an anonymous questionnaire that we sent as a Google form to Lebanese psychiatrists and psychiatry residents by email and phone messages. The descriptive analysis was done using Microsoft Excel software, and the analytical analysis was done using the SPSS software and the following statistical tests: independent-sample test and the Mann Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Forty people responded, including 19 men and 21 women (16 psychiatric interns, 15 university psychiatrists and 9 non-university psychiatrists). Concerning the questions related to the use of restraint, 70% did not find that it is being commonly used in hospital practice. However, 92.5% would use it to counter the patient's dangerousness and 60% to help deliver treatment. 57.5% did not find the repeated usage of restraint as a dehumanization of care, but the majority (70%) agreed with the need for temporal limitation of any form of restraint. As for the ability to consent, 90% considered a patient in a psychotic state as unfit to consent.

CONCLUSIONS

Restraint is considered uncommon by psychiatrists and psychiatric residents in Lebanon and must remain an option of last resort with efforts being made upstream in order to avoid situations where the use of restraint becomes mandatory. Post critical thinking is paramount, and restraint should never respond to a lack of manpower or a security goal. Informed consent is one of the most important guarantors of the principle of autonomy, and must be sought in each patient, individually. Finally, no significant difference was found between the subgroups, which would therefore become a single population. Ethical reflection would therefore be directly linked to the population. Mental illnesses are becoming more common and an important source of morbidity worldwide. It is our role to ensure the dignity of the mentally ill. The introduction of the Psychiatric Nurse Diploma, an increase in the relational approach to the training of psychiatrists in Lebanon, and an increase in the number of health care teams may help to maximize the ability of capacity.

Psychotic, Mood, and Anxiety Disorders and Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have shown that psychiatric disorders can be associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk, that is, pulmonary embolism (PE) and/or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). In this study, we provide a systematic review and meta-analyses of the studies addressing this issue.

METHODS

All studies addressing the risk of VTE phenomena (whole VTE, PE, DVT, fatal VTE) in individuals with psychotic, mood, and anxiety disorders published between 1998 and 2019 were reviewed and included in the meta-analyses. Main characteristics of the studies and data concerning VTE risk were extracted. The methodological qualities of the studies were also analyzed. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used. A meta-analysis was conducted separately for each disorder, as well as separately for unadjusted and adjusted studies. Meta-analyses were repeated considering only good-quality studies. Heterogeneity was assessed.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were reviewed and 15 included in the meta-analyses. Psychotic and bipolar disorders were significantly associated with VTE risk (VTE, DVT, PE, and fatal VTE for psychotic disorder: odds ratios [ORs] between 1.29 and 2.20; VTE, DVT, and PE for bipolar disorder: ORs between 1.22 and 2.14). Depression and anxiety disorders were associated with VTE risk only in adjusted analyses (DVT and PE for depression: ORs = 1.29; VTE and PE for anxiety disorders: ORs between 1.14 and 1.49).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of VTE among individuals with psychiatric disorders may be explained by hypercoagulability and stasis, with both being related to, and independent of, treatment adverse effects. VTE risk should be taken into consideration in the treatment for people with psychiatric disorders.