Surgical management of lung cancer invading the aorta or the superior vena cava

Investigating the predictive factors of thoracic aortic invasion and surgical outcomes in patients with primary lung cancer: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate predictors of thoracic aortic invasion in lung cancer patients using preoperative clinical and imaging characteristics and elucidate surgical outcomes in cases of aortic invasion.

METHODS

Of the 4751 lung cancer patients who underwent surgery at our hospital, we included 126 (6.8%) who underwent left-sided surgery and in whom tumor appeared to be in contact with the thoracic aorta on preoperative imaging. The patients were divided into two groups: group A, 23 patients (18%) who underwent combined aortic resection (+); group B, 103 patients (82%) who did not undergo combined aortic resection (-).

RESULTS

The percentage of aortic invasion for tumor diameter <3 cm, 3-4 cm, 4-5 cm, 5-7 cm, and >7 cm was 0%, 13%, 23%, 16%, and 35%, respectively. The percentages of aortic invasion were 27%, 16%, and 0% for tumor localization in the upper division, S6, and S10, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that aortic depression due to tumor or loss of fatty tissue between tumor and mediastinum in the chest CT significantly predicted aortic invasion (odds ratio = 23.83, 16.66). Group A demonstrated significantly more blood loss, longer operative time, prolonged hospital stay, and increased percentage of recurrent nerve palsy (13%) compared to group B. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for patients in group A were 53.4%, 24.3%, and 24.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

If the chest CT of a patient demonstrates aortic depression due to tumor or loss of fatty tissue between tumor and mediastinum, aortic complications should be considered when planning surgery.

T4 Lung Carcinoma with Infiltration of the Thoracic Aorta: Indication and Surgical Procedure

Lung carcinomas infiltrate the aorta mostly on the left side and are altogether rare. As an initial step, complete staging is performed and the results are evaluated in an interdisciplinary tumor board. If the patient's general condition including cardiopulmonary reserves is sufficient, and if there is neither distant metastasis nor an N2 situation, surgical resection may be indicated. The option for neoadjuvant chemotherapy should always be taken into consideration. Depending on the anatomic tumor location, partial lung resection and resection of the affected aortic wall are performed employing a cardiopulmonary bypass. The resected aortic wall is replaced by a vascular prosthesis. In recent years, this proven procedure has partly been replaced by an alternative one, avoiding extracorporeal circulation. An endoaortic stent is implanted in the affected area followed by partial lung resection and resection of the diseased aortic wall. This new procedure has significantly reduced perioperative mortality and morbidity. With proper patient selection, long-term survival can be improved even in this complex malignoma.

Extended Pulmonary Resection for T4 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

T4 non-small cell lung cancer is a locally advanced disease with poor prognosis. The operation can be challenging even for an experienced surgeon. N2 disease has been shown repeatedly as a risk factor for poor outcome, and these patients should not be candidates for surgical treatment. Surgery for locally advanced T4 tumors without mediastinal lymph node involvement (T4N0 and T4N1) has been demonstrated to result in good outcomes in carefully selected patients. Patients with T4N0-1M0 should be rejected for surgery only after consulting an expert surgical center. As with other stages, the decision for resectability and surgery should be made by a multidisciplinary team.

Endovascular Surgery of Descending Thoracic Aorta Involved in T4 Lung Tumor

PURPOSE

Surgical treatment of primary lung T4 tumors is controversial especially when the cancer invades the mediastinal structures or the descending thoracic aorta. Conventional surgical treatment is associated with a high perioperative mortality and morbidity rate. Thoracic EndoVascular Aortic Repair has emerged as a valid off-label alternative to conventional surgery. We aimed to assess perioperative and midterm aortic-related outcome of patients who have undergone aortic stent-graft implantation, followed by en bloc surgical treatment of the involved aorta and lung cancer resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From July 2017 to May 2020, we treated 5 patients diagnosed with a T4 lung cancer by the involvement of the descending thoracic aorta. When only the descending thoracic aorta is involved, a 2-stage procedure was considered, with aortic stent-graft implantation performed before tumor resection. One-stage strategy, with stent-graft implantation carried out before thoracotomy, was preferred for patients with the involvement of cardiac and/or other vascular mediastinal structures.

RESULTS

The mean age was 58.4 ± 6.2 years. All patients were affected by non-small cell lung cancer. All 5 patients required a single stent-graft to completely cover the involved segment of aorta. Four patients underwent a 2-stage procedure. One patient, with the involvement of the left inferior pulmonary vein, required a 1-stage en bloc resection of the left lower lobe, aortic wall adventitia, left inferior pulmonary vein, and reconstruction of the left atrial wall. Primary procedural success was achieved in all. At follow-up, no patient developed aortic-related complications. One patient died 2 years after surgery, due to local recurrence of the tumor.

CONCLUSION

T4 lung resection combined with aortic stent-graft implantation can be safely performed. Endovascular surgery, by avoiding the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamping, and graft replacement, can reduce significant morbidity and mortality rate. Postoperative and long-term outcome of these patients treated with endovascular surgery is mainly related to pulmonary disease, not to aortic treatment.

Prognostic Factors in Patients with Clinic Locally Advanced T4 Lung Cancer: Surgical Considerations

Background Inclusion of surgery in the treatment of T4 lung cancer has been a debate for the last two decades. The aim of this study is to investigate the potential prognostic factors which could affect the outcome.

Methods Fifty-seven clinical T4 non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients out of 716 lung resections, who were operated at a single institution in 7 years period, were included in this study. Patients are grouped into three groups as patients with neoadjuvant treatment group (group 1 n: 16), salvage surgery group (surgery after 3 months of definitive chemotherapy and radiotherapy) (group 2 n: 14), and straightforward surgery group (group 3 n: 27) with adjuvant treatment. Groups were analyzed and compared in terms of postoperative complications, 30 days of mortality, disease free survival, and overall survival.

Results Mean overall survival (OS) was 48.43 ± 4.4 months and mean disease-free survival (DFS) 40.55 ± 4.46 months for all patients. Thirty days mortality was 5.2% and complication rates were 63.1%. Two years OS was 61.4 ± 6.4%, DFS was 58.1 ± 7.8%. Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 patients had mean 39.14 ± 5.6, 44.7 ± 7.1, and 62.9 ± 4.8 months for OS (p: 0.09), and 29.6 ± 7.2, 38.4 ± 9.1, and 46.9 ± 6 months for DFS (p: 0.27). Patients who received blood transfusion showed significantly worse outcomes (p: 0.001 for DFS and p: 0.004 for OS).

Conclusion According to our outcomes, surgery should be included in the treatment of clinical T4 lung cancer when physiologically and oncologically possible with careful patient selection. This study demonstrates that patients receiving straightforward surgery have longer survival, in spite of higher perioperative mortality rate. Risks and benefits should be considered carefully.

A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study on Superior Vena Cava Resection in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND

Surgery for non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) invading the superior vena cava (SVC) is rarely performed due to surgical complexities and reported poor prognoses. Different methods have been described to reconstruct the SVC, such as direct suture, patch use or prosthesis, according to its circumferential involvement. The aim of our study was to analyze the short- and long-term results of different types of SVC resection and reconstruction for T4 NSCLCs.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and December 2019, 80 patients received an anatomical lung resection with SVC surgery in this multicenter retrospective study. The partial resection and direct suture or patch reconstruction group included 64 patients, while the complete resection and prosthesis reconstruction group included 16 patients. The primary endpoints were as follows: long-term survival and disease-free survival. The secondary endpoints were as follows: perioperative complications and 30- and 90-day mortality. Unpaired t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for non-parametric variables were applied to discrete or continuous data, and the chi-square test was applied to dichotomous or categorical data. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

No differences were found between the two groups in terms of general characteristics and surgical, oncological and survival outcomes. In particular, there were no differences in terms of early (50.0% vs. 68.8%, p = 0.178) and late complication frequency (12.5% vs. 12.5%, p = 1.000), 30- and 90-day mortality, R status, recurrence, overall survival (33.89 ± 40.35 vs. 35.70 ± 51.43 months, p = 0.432) and disease-free survival (27.56 ± 40.36 vs. 31.28 ± 53.08 months, p = 0.668). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that age was the only independent predictive factor for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, SVC resection has good oncological and survival outcomes, regardless of the proportion of circumferential involvement and the type of reconstruction.

Long term results of surgery for NSCLC and aortic invasion. A multicenter retrospective cohort study. Aorta involvement in NSCLC

BACKGROUND

Aortic invasion from non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) is a relative contraindication to surgery for oncological and technical reasons. Only a few studies have been published showing good results. Our aim was to evaluate short and long-term results of surgery for T4 NSCLC with aortic resection.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective study including 47 patients (33 males and 14 females) who received a major lung resection with aortic surgery in our centers between January 2000 and December 2016.

RESULTS

Adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 31 patients (66.0%). Induction therapy was used in 14 patients. Pneumonectomy was performed in 34 patients (72.3%). A subadventitial dissection with or without endovascular stent graft was carried out in 40 patients (85.1%), a cardiopulmonary bypass was used in 3 patients and left heart bypass in 4. Intraoperatively, two patients had bleeding (4.3%) and one ventricular fibrillation (2.1%). Twenty-three patients (48.9%) experienced at least one postoperative complication. A radical resection was achieved in 39 patients (83.0%). Thirty-day and 90-day mortality were 2.1% and 4.3%. One-, 3- and 5-year overall survival were 85.1%, 57.4% and 53.2%. Overall and disease-free survivals were significantly influenced by pathological lymph node status and R status that were independent predictive factors for poorer survival at the multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic resection during surgery for NSCLC is a challenging situation. Nevertheless, oncologic outcomes may be favorable in selected cases justifying a risky procedure that should be performed in experienced hands.

Cardiopulmonary bypass does not consequentially contribute to postoperative distant metastasis of giant refractory thoracic tumors: A retrospective study with long-term follow-up

Background

Few clinical research studies with long‐term follow‐up have revealed whether cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) increases the risk of postoperative distant metastasis in patients with giant refractory thoracic tumors. The present study evaluated the risk of distant metastasis after surgery utilizing CPB with long‐term follow‐up.

Methods

Clinical data for patients with giant refractory thoracic tumors who underwent resection with the use of CPB in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University during the past 11 years were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

Of the 14 patients with giant refractory thoracic tumors who had undergone surgery under CPB, 10 patients (71.4%) were completely resected. Twelve patients were followed up for 13–127 months with 10 patients were completely resected and two patients could not be completely resected due to severe tissue invasion. Three patients (25%) suffered from distant metastasis, and four patients (33.3%) experienced local recurrence. Only one patient (1/10) with complete resection suffered from distant metastasis, while two patients (2/10) experienced local recurrence. Two patients (2/2) with major resection suffered from both distant metastasis and local recurrence. Median overall survival for patients who have been regularly followed up was 50 months with 1‐, 5‐, and 10‐year survival of 100%, 75%, and 66.7%. No difference was found between the distant metastasis survival and the local recurrence survival. (p = 0.99).

Conclusions

CPB is an effective strategy for complete resection of the giant refractory thoracic tumors with an acceptable risk of postoperative distant metastasis for some patients.

[Preoperative 4D-CT Provided Helpful Evaluation of Aorta Invasion of Left Lower Lobe Lung Cancer]

A 73-year-old woman was diagnosed by bronchoscopic examination with primary left lung cancer (Adenocarcinoma, cT3N0M0, stage IIB), which was closely adjacent to the descending aorta in contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT). This CT did not reveal any invasion of a tumor into the descending aorta, and a dynamic fourth dimension CT (4D-CT) indicated that there was no invasion of the aorta by this tumor, so we decided to perform surgery. The operative procedure was a left lower lobectomy and lymph node dissection with the use of a thoracoscope. An intraoperative finding was that the tumor had not invaded the aorta. There are few reports about the evaluation of vascular invasion using the dynamic 4D-CT. We consider that the dynamic 4D-CT gave very useful information about vascular invasion.

Direct Cross-Clamping for Resection of Lung Cancer Invading the Aortic Arch or the Subclavian Artery

BACKGROUND

Resection of lung cancer infiltrating the aortic arch or the subclavian artery can be accomplished in selected patients with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Direct cross-clamping of the aortic arch and the left subclavian artery without CPB for radical resection of the tumor can be an alternative. This study presents one group's experience with this technique.

METHODS

Between October 2016 and May 2019, 9 patients (5 male, 4 female) underwent radical resection of lung cancer infiltrating the aortic arch (n = 5) or the left subclavian artery (n = 4) by direct cross-clamping technique at Sapienza University of Rome, Italy. Seven left upper lobectomies, 1 left pneumonectomy, and 1 left upper sleeve lobectomy were performed. Reconstruction of the aortic arch was performed by direct suturing or polyethylene terephthalate (Dacron) patch, whereas the subclavian artery was reconstructed with a Dacron conduit. Three patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Patients' mean age was 64.7 ± 13.3 years (range, 36 to 78 years). Aortic arch resection was partial in all cases (adventitial in 1 and full thickness in 4); left subclavian artery resection was adventitial in 2 patients and circumferential in 2. All the resections were complete. Prosthetic reconstruction was performed in 4 cases. Mean operative time was 130 ± 25.6 minutes; mean vascular clamping time was 28.2 ± 3.2 minutes. No mortality occurred. The major complication rate was 11.1 %. At a mean follow-up of 17 ± 9 months (range, 5 to 29 months), the recurrence rate was 33.3%. Median survival was 20 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct cross-clamping as an alternative to CPB for resection of lung cancer infiltrating the aortic arch or the subclavian artery is a feasible, safe, and reliable procedure in selected patients.

Prognostic Factors and Survival in Resected T4 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Is There Any Difference in the T4 Subgroups?

INTRODUCTION

The eighth edition of the TNM classification revised the subgroups of T4 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to compare the T4-NSCLC subgroups that underwent surgical treatment in terms of mortality, morbidity, survival, and prognostic factors based on the new classification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2000 and 2014, a total of 284 T4-NSCLC patients who underwent lung resection (mediastinal organ invasion, n = 114; ipsilateral different lobe tumors, n = 32; and tumors larger than 7 cm, n = 138) were included in the present study.

RESULTS

Surgical mortality and morbidity were 5.6% (n = 16) and 23.9% (n = 68), respectively. The 5-year survival rates were 46% for ipsilateral different lobe tumors, 45.4% for tumours larger than 7 cm, and 36.6% for mediastinal organ invasion (28% for patients with heart/atrium invasion, 43.3% for carina invasion, 37.5% for large vessel invasion) (p = 0.223). Age above 65 (p = 0.002, HR = 1.781), pN2 versus pN0/1 (p < 0.0001, HR = 2.564), incomplete resection (p = 0.003, HR = 2.297), and pneumonectomy (p = 0.02, HR = 1.524) were identified as poor prognostic survival factors. According to multivariate analysis, mediastinal lymph node metastasis (p = 0.001) and incomplete resection (p = 0.0026) were the independent negative risk factors for survival.

CONCLUSION

According to the results of our study, surgical treatment is a good option in T4-NSCLC patients who have no mediastinal lymph node metastasis and are completely resectable. There is no difference in terms of survival among the T4 subgroups. The eighth edition of the TNM classification has a better prognostic definition than the previous version.

Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer invading adjacent great vessels on radiologic findings: is it safe?

We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate treatment outcomes and the risk of fatal hemorrhage by tumor regression when definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) was delivered to patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) invading adjacent great vessels on radiological findings. We selected 37 unresectable NSCLC patients with adjacent great vessel invasion (GVI) by carefully reviewing each patient's images. The criteria of definite GVI were as follows: irregular indentation at the tumor-vessel contact border, slit-like narrowing of adjacent great vessels by the tumor, presence of intra-luminal mass formation, tumors contacting >5 cm of adjacent great vessel and obliteration of the intervening fat plane between tumor and adjacent great vessel, and/or tumors contacting more than half of the circumference of the aortic wall. All of the patients completed the CCRT, of which the median dose was 66.0 Gy (range, 59.4-72.0 Gy) with 1.8 or 2.0 Gy per fraction. The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate for total patients was 48.2%. Early nodal staging (P = 0.006) and good performance status (P = 0.044) were identified as independent prognostic factors associated with better OS. There was no fatal complication related to the GVI, such as a sudden death or massive hemoptysis due to vascular rupture after CCRT. We concluded that definitive CCRT for NSCLC patients with GVI on radiological findings has a low risk of fatal complication and it can benefit long-term survival when treated with CCRT in patients with early nodal staging or good performance status.

Initial extended resection or neoadjuvant therapy for T4 non-small cell lung cancer-What is the evidence?

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors that invade surrounding structures within the chest (T4) are a heterogeneous group, and, as such, there are no straightforward guidelines for their management. Advances in imaging, invasive mediastinal staging, and neoadjuvant therapies have expanded the role of surgery with curative intent for this patient group and have also diminished the rate of explorative thoracotomies. Unlike for T4 superior sulcus tumors, the use of neoadjuvant therapy for central T4 tumors is not clearly defined. The most important determinants of a successful outcome after surgery are achieving an R0 resection and avoiding incidental pathologic N2 disease. Use of neoadjuvant therapy in this setting may yield better outcomes after surgery, as both of these variables can be altered if the tumor responds to neoadjuvant therapy. Moreover, response to induction therapy has been shown to have prognostic value.

Is Surgery after Chemoradiotherapy Feasible in Lung Cancer Patients with Superior Vena Cava Invasion?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to explore the possibility of surgery after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced-non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) with superior vena cava (SVC) resection in terms of prognosis and early and late postoperative course.

METHODS

The medical records of NSCLC patients who underwent surgery after CRT at our institution between January 2001 and March 2016 were reviewed. We evaluated the feasibility of surgery with SVC resection after CRT.

RESULTS

A total of 8 LA-NSCLC patients were enrolled in this study. The SVC management included a graft replacement in two patients, pericardial patch repair in two, and direct suture closure in four. A complete resection was achieved in seven of the eight patients (87.5%). Postoperative early and late complication rate (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ grade III) was 25%. All the complications were manageable, and no treatment-related deaths occurred in this series. Although seven out of eight patients showed good patency of reconstructed SVC, one patient exhibited the SVC occlusion during long-term follow-up period. Regarding the prognosis, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 60.0%, and the 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was 75.0%.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that surgery with SVC resection after CRT is a feasible procedure in terms of clinical outcomes and postoperative course.

Long-term survival in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer invading the great vessels and heart

Background

The aim of this study was to analyze the surgical outcomes of locally advanced lung cancer invading the great vessels or heart, according to the extension of cancer invasion.

Methods

From 1995 to 2015, 59 patients who were surgically treated and pathologically diagnosed with T4N0–1 non‐small cell lung cancer with invasion to the great vessels or heart were enrolled. Surgical outcomes were compared between patient groups with and without intrapericardial invasion.

Results

The median age was 64 years (interquartile range [IQR] 57–68) and 56 patients (95%) were male. In‐hospital mortality was 9% and median overall survival was 30 months (IQR 12–83). One and five‐year overall survival rates were 75% and 44%, respectively. The median overall survival in patients with lung cancer invasion to the intrapericardial space (n = 45) was 27 months (IQR 10–63), while it was 42 months (IQR 18–104) in patients without intrapericardial invasion (n = 14). Median disease‐free survival was significantly poorer in patients with intrapericardial invasion (12 months; IQR 6–55), especially in patients with heart invasion (n = 11, 7 months, IQR 5–27), than in patients without intrapericardial invasion (30 months, IQR 13–103).

Conclusion

Patients with lung cancer invading the intrapericardial space showed worse surgical outcomes in both overall and disease‐free survival. Therefore, surgical management should be carefully considered in patients with intrapericardial invasion.

Surgery for T4 lung cancer invading the thoracic aorta: Do we push the limits?

BACKGROUND

Few investigators have described en bloc resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) invading the aorta.

AIM OF STUDY

Analysis of outcome and prognostic factors for en bloc resections of NSCLC invading the aorta.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients (27 males, 8 females; mean age 63 ± 8.6 years) were operated between 1994 and 2015 in four European Centers.

HISTOLOGY

12 (34.3%) squamous cell carcinoma, and 6 (17.1%) undifferentiated/large cell carcinoma. The site of aortic infiltration was the descending thoracic aorta in 24 (68.6%) patients, the aortic arch in 9 (25.7%), and the aortic arch and supraortic trunks in 2 (5.7%).

RESULTS

Lung resection consisted of pneumonectomy in 19 (54.3%) patients and lobectomy in 16 (45.7%). Aortic resection management was undertaken by endograft positioning (37.1%), subadventitial dissection (37.1%), cardiopulmonary/aorto-aortic bypass (17.2%), and direct clamping (8.6%). A tubular graft replacement was carried out in five cases, a synthetic patch repair in 6. Mortality was 2.9%, morbidity 37.1%. Patients undergoing pneumonectomy had a significantly higher morbidity rate compared with lobectomy (52% vs 18.7%; P = 0.003), although patients managed with aortic endografting had a lower complication rate. Median overall and disease-free survival rates were 31.3 and 22.2 months, respectively. Gender and site of aortic infiltration were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of NSCLC combined with an infiltrated aorta is a challenging procedure that can be performed with reasonable morbidity and mortality in highly selected patients.

Surgery for malignant lesions of the chest which extensively involved the mediastinum, lung, and heart

OBJECTIVE

Radical resection for thoracic malignancies that invade the great vessels or heart structure is an uncommon, high-risk operation. To help surgeons determine therapeutic strategy, we reviewed the patient characteristics and outcomes of combined thoracic and cardiovascular surgery for thoracic malignancies.

METHODS

Surgical resections of lung cancer, mediastinal tumor and pulmonary artery sarcoma invading great vessels or heart structures were reviewed from the literature.

RESULTS

Pneumonectomy was often performed for lung cancer invading the aorta, superior vena cava, and left atrium. Complete resection (R0), no mediastinal lymph node metastasis and without using cardiopulmonary bypass led to a good prognosis. Induction therapy was often performed for complete resection. Regarding mediastinal tumors, thymic epithelial tumors or germ cell tumors occasionally invaded the great vessels or heart structures. For these malignancies, multimodality therapy was often performed, and complete resection could be one of the prognostic factors. The resection of primary pulmonary artery sarcoma (PPAS) is also a combined thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. The primary treatment for PPAS is surgical resection; specifically, pulmonary endarterectomy and pneumonectomy, because PPAS has substantial resistance to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The prognosis of PPAS is poor, but surgical resection has potential for long-term survival.

CONCLUSION

Although these surgeries are uncommon and invasive for the patients, selecting appropriate patients, aggressive multimodality therapy, and performing combined thoracic and cardiovascular surgery can contribute to a good outcome.

Surgery for lung cancer invading the mediastinum

Lung cancer infiltrating the mediastinum is a subset of locally advanced lung tumors for which surgery is not routinely offered. Radical operations that involve removal of adjacent mediastinal structures to obtain free margins may provide a realistic cure. Such extended resections are typically reserved to highly motivated patients seeking more aggressive management, and are only offered following complete evaluation on a case-by-case basis. Positive prognosis depends on complete R0 resection and lack of mediastinal nodal metastases. Careful and exhaustive preoperative planning as well as surgical expertise cannot be overemphasized for successful surgical outcomes. Here we provide a brief summary of the literature as well as our own experience managing these rare and sometimes challenging surgeries.

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Stent Graft to Facilitate Aortic Resection During Pneumonectomy and Vertebrectomy for Locally Invasive Lung Cancer

Endovascular stent graft placement has been used to facilitate resection of tumors invading the thoracic aorta. Here we describe the first use of an aortic endograft for preoperative protection of the thoracic descending aorta before left pneumonectomy for a primary lung cancer invading the thoracic spine and thoracic descending aorta.

Endovascular stent graft for surgical resection of lung cancer invading aortic arch: report of a 79-year-old patient

Combined resection of the aortic arch and lung with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients with locally advanced lung cancer is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Aortic stenting followed by complete resection might be an alternative therapeutic strategy for patients with lung cancer. Here we report a 79-year-old man with respiratory compromise who had lung cancer invading the distal aortic arch. This case study reports that combined resection of the aortic arch with left upper segmentectomy following endovascular stenting can be safely and easily performed without CPB.

Safe resection of the aortic wall infiltrated by lung cancer after placement of an endoluminal prosthesis

BACKGROUND

Few investigators have reported the results of combined resection of lung cancer infiltrating the thoracic aorta; only anecdotal accounts of off-label use of thoracic aortic endografts to facilitate resection of such tumors have been published. In this paper, we describe our experience using this innovative approach in terms of technical details and outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data on 9 patients (6 men and 3 women, median age 61 years) with preoperatively suspected thoracic aorta neoplastic invasion, who were operated on after positioning of an endograft and underwent en bloc tumor resection including the aortic wall.

RESULTS

All but one cancer were non-small cell lung carcinomas; 4 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 7 received adjuvant therapy. Aortic endografting was performed 2 to 17 days before resection of the tumor in 7 patients and as part of a one-stage procedure in 2 patients. The proximal end of the stent graft was deployed in the aortic arch (n = 1) or the descending aorta (n = 8). Lung resections were left pneumonectomies in 4 patients and left lower lobectomies in 5. Five patients underwent additional buttressing of the aortic defect using a synthetic patch (n = 2) or the omentum (n = 3). No cardiopulmonary bypass was required. At the last follow-up, 3 patients had evidence of tumor recurrence (one local and two distant). No endograft-related complications were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic aortic endografting allowed safe en bloc resection of tumors invading the aortic wall, avoiding the need for extracorporeal circulatory support. Such an extended indication for thoracic aortic endografts seems promising and should be considered for selected oncologic cases.

Combined resection of great vessels or the heart for non-small lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

The surgical indications for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) infiltrating a great vessel or the heart are controversial. We assessed clinical features and surgical outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent combined resection of a lung and great vessel.

METHODS

Fourteen patients underwent great vessel resection under a lobectomy (n = 9), sleeve lobectomy (n = 2), or pneumonectomy (n = 3) between 2000 and 2011, in whom the aorta was resected in 6, superior vena cava in 5, right atrium in 1, and left atrium in 2. The histological types were adenocarcinoma (n = 8) and squamous cell carcinoma (n = 6).

RESULTS

Complete resection was performed in 12 patients. Of all patients, 7 had pN0 disease, 2 had pN1, and 4 had pN2. The postoperative morbidity rate was 28.6% and mortality rate was 7.1%. The 5-year survival rate was 26.8% for all patients, 46.9% for those with an adenocarcinoma, 0% for those with a squamous cell carcinoma, 53.6% for those with pN0, and 0% for those with pN1-2.

CONCLUSION

Resection of the great vessels and heart involved by NSCLC can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality, and results in prolonged survival in patients, with an adenocarcinoma or N0 status.

Extended resections of non-small cell lung cancers invading the aorta, pulmonary artery, left atrium, or esophagus: can they be justified?

T4 tumors that invade the heart, great vessels, or esophagus comprise a heterogenous group of locally invasive lung cancers. Prognosis depends on nodal status; this relationship has been consistently demonstrated in many of the small series of extended resection. Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines do not recommend surgery for T4 extension with N2-3 disease (stage IIIB). However, biopsy-proven T4 N0-1 (stage IIIA) may be operable. Localized tumors with invasion of the aorta, pulmonary artery, left atrium, or esophagus represent a small subset of T4 disease. Acquiring sufficient randomized data to provide statistical proof of a survival advantage for patients undergoing extended resections for these neoplasms will likely never be possible.Therefore, we are left to critically analyze current documented experience to make clinical decisions on a case-by-case basis.It is clear that the operative morbidity and mortality of extended resections for locally advanced T4 tumors have significantly improved over time,yet the risks are still high. The indications for such procedures and the anticipated outcomes should be clearly weighed in terms of potential perioperative complications and expertise of the surgical team. Patients with T4 N0-1 have the best prognosis and with complete resection may have the potential for cure. The use of induction therapy and surgery for advanced T4 tumors may improve survival. Current data suggest that for tumors that invade the aorta, pulmonary artery,left atrium, or esophagus, resection should be considered in relation to multidisciplinary care.For properly selected patients receiving treatment at high volume, experienced centers, extended resections may be warranted.

Superior vena caval resection in lung cancer

Lung cancer with involvement of the SVC is uncommon but presents a unique management challenge. Discovery of N2 disease should be given its due diligence and these patients should undergo induction therapy. Patients can attain favorable long-term outcomes with surgery, but they need to be carefully selected at specialized centers.

[pT4 non-small cell lung cancer: Surgical characteristics in present practice]

INTRODUCTION

pT4 is a group of miscellaneous tumors: our goal was to revisit their surgical reality.

METHODS

The different characteristics and prognostic factors of lung pT4 (n=403) were analysed according to three subgroups: G1 - by direct extension; G2 - by nodule in other ipsilateral lobe; G3 - because of both.

RESULTS

There were 332 males and 71 females mean aged 61.5 years. Surgery [exploratory: 89 (22.1 %), lobectomy: 149 (37 %), pneumonectomy: 169 (41.9 %)] was followed by 26 postoperative deaths (6.5 %), 82 complications (20.3 %) and concerned few pN0 (47.6 %). G1 (n=196) and G3 (n=53) were not different. By comparison with them, G2 (n=53) were mainly females (24\13 %), with less explorative thoracotomy (2.6\34 %), more complete R0 resections (77\29 %), less pneumonectomy (31\47 %), more small sized tumors (mean: 37\57 mm), more adenocarcinoma (67\32 %), more N0 tumors (48\31.7 %) and stages IIIA disease (46.7\56 %). G2 5-year survival rates were higher (G2: 22 %; G1: 13 %; G3: 15 %); G1 rates depended of the invaded structure (20.9 % for the vertebra down to 0 % for the esophagus and carina). pN2 rates were not very high but not different between groups (G1: 13.6 %; G2: 15.6 %; G3: 14.3 %; P=0.52). Multivariate analysis demonstrated completeness and type of resection, stage and age as independent factors of prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Surgery for pT4 is justified provided rigorous selection of extension forms. However, assimilating extension and ipsilateral lobe nodule in a same group does not obey to surgical reality.

Special treatment issues in non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

This guideline updates the second edition and addresses patients with particular forms of non-small cell lung cancer that require special considerations, including Pancoast tumors, T4 N0,1 M0 tumors, additional nodules in the same lobe (T3), ipsilateral different lobe (T4) or contralateral lung (M1a), synchronous and metachronous second primary lung cancers, solitary brain and adrenal metastases, and chest wall involvement.

METHODS

The nature of these special clinical cases is such that in most cases, meta-analyses or large prospective studies of patients are not available. To ensure that these guidelines were supported by the most current data available, publications appropriate to the topics covered in this article were obtained by performing a literature search of the MEDLINE computerized database. Where possible, we also reference other consensus opinion statements. Recommendations were developed by the writing committee, graded by a standardized method, and reviewed by all members of the Lung Cancer Guidelines panel prior to approval by the Thoracic Oncology NetWork, Guidelines Oversight Committee, and the Board of Regents of the American College of Chest Physicians.

RESULTS

In patients with a Pancoast tumor, a multimodality approach appears to be optimal, involving chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection, provided that appropriate staging has been carried out. Carefully selected patients with central T4 tumors that do not have mediastinal node involvement are uncommon, but surgical resection appears to be beneficial as part of their treatment rather than definitive chemoradiotherapy alone. Patients with lung cancer and an additional malignant nodule are difficult to categorize, and the current stage classification rules are ambiguous. Such patients should be evaluated by an experienced multidisciplinary team to determine whether the additional lesion represents a second primary lung cancer or an additional tumor nodule corresponding to the dominant cancer. Highly selected patients with a solitary focus of metastatic disease in the brain or adrenal gland appear to benefit from resection or stereotactic radiosurgery. This is particularly true in patients with a long disease-free interval. Finally, in patients with chest wall involvement, provided that the tumor can be completely resected and N2 nodal disease is absent, primary surgical resection should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Carefully selected patients with more uncommon presentations of lung cancer may benefit from an aggressive surgical approach.

Effect analysis of chemoradiotherapy after operation in patients with stage III A non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of chemoradiotherapy after surgery on III A stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A total of 156 NSCLC patients undergoing total pneumonectomy or pulmonary lobectomy were included in this study. The chemotherapy group (n=75) received the protocol of cisplatin (DDP) + gemcitabine (GEM) / docetaxel (DOC) / vinorelbine (NVB); the radiotherapy + chemotherapy group (n=81) received sequential chemoradiotherapy. The response rate, local control rate in 1 to 2 years, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse reactions were evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was obviously higher in radiotherapy + chemotherapy group (79.4%) than in chemotherapy group (56.8%) (P<0.01). The 1 year local control rates for chemotherapy group and radiotherapy + chemotherapy group were (69.1±7.9)% and (77.8±8.2)% respectively and the difference reached statistical significance (P<0.001). The 2 year local control rates were (42.1±6.1)% and (61.5±6.9)% respectively (P<0.001). The difference in median follow-up time between the two groups did not reach statistical meaning (P>0.05), while the median PFS of two groups were 10.8 months and 16.9 months respectively (P<0.001). 1-year and 3-year survival rates were obviously higher in radiotherapy + chemotherapy group than in chemotherapy group, and the difference reached statistical significance (P<0.05 or P<0.01). The adverse reactions manifested as hematological toxicity and digestive tract reaction in the two groups. In the radiotherapy + chemotherapy group, incidences of radiation-induced esophagus injury and lung injury were 24.7% and 34.6% respectively, all occurring within 2 to 6 weeks after the start of radiation and both below grade 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemoradiotherapy after surgery can improve local control rate and reduce or prevent distant metastasis, but there are still many controversies. In clinical work, we should carefully evaluate each patient's age, lung function, basic physical condition scoring and complications to choose a therapeutic schedule that is suitable for the patient.

Left upper lobectomy with combined resection of the distal arch aorta after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer

We report a case of complete resection of lung cancer involving the thoracic aorta, after induction chemoradiotherapy in a 55-year-old man. The chemoradiotherapy, which consisted of two courses of platinum-based chemotherapy with concurrent radiation to a total of 40 Gy, resulted in a partial response. Left upper lobectomy with combined resection and reconstruction of the distal arch aorta and left subclavian artery was performed under cardiopulmonary bypass. The patient was given two courses of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy, and there has been no sign of recurrence in the 34 months since his operation.

Extensive resections: pancoast tumors, chest wall resections, en bloc vascular resections

Infiltration by lung tumor of adjacent anatomic structures including major vessels, main bronchi, and chest wall not only influences the oncologic severity of the disease but also increases the technical complexity of surgery, requiring extended resections and demanding reconstructive procedures. Completeness of resection represents in every case one of the main factors influencing the long-term outcome of patients. Technical and oncologic aspects of extended operations, including resection of Pancoast tumors and chest wall, bronchovascular sleeve resections, and en bloc resections of major thoracic vessels, are reported in this article.

Effect of ageing and pulmonary inflammation on the incidence and number of cross-bridging structures in pneumothorax patients

BACKGROUND

There is an improved prognosis for T4 non-small-cell lung cancer in patients who show particular patterns of direct mediastinal invasion. The particular patterns suggest the presence of direct pathways other than the pulmonary hilum between each of the lungs and the mediastinum/chest wall.

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence and number of such direct pathways in pneumothorax patients as well as the factors that affect the development of these pathways.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two radiologists independently analyzed multidetector computed tomographic images of 81 patients with pneumothorax to assess the incidence and distribution pattern of the cross-bridging structures in the pleural cavity.

RESULTS

Cross-bridging structures were observed in the right pneumothorax in 34/54 (63%) patients and in the left pneumothorax in 19/32 (59%) patients. The number of cross-bridging structures was found to be positively correlated with ageing and pulmonary disease. The distribution patterns of cross-bridging structures were found to be specific in formation and often in repeated locations, regardless of the presence of pulmonary disease or the age of the patient.

CONCLUSION

Cross-bridging structures in pneumothoraces were found more frequently in older patients and in patients with pulmonary disease. However, some of the cross-bridging structures may have been congenital because of their specific formations and repeated locations.

Novel use of endoluminal repair as prophylaxis of aortic rupture secondary to radiotherapy for lung cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) invading the aorta is staged as T(4). Only 9% of T(4) tumors are resected; the alternative is chemoradiotherapy, but for peri-aortic NSCLC, radiation damage to the aortic wall can induce fatal rupture. We report the case of a 76 year-old man with a 3-cm left lower lobe NSCLC clearly invading the aortic wall. A thoracic stent graft was inserted prophylactically to prevent aortic rupture. He then received 64 Gy radiotherapy in 32 fractions, resulting in tumor shrinkage. Prophylactic aortic endografting, a less invasive treatment than open surgery, may enable high dose irradiation of the aortic wall.

What is the role for surgery in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a therapeutic challenge. Although combined modality has become the standard treatment in stage III NSCLC, the role of surgery in it remains controversial. This review will address recent evidence on the potential role of surgery in either superior sulcus tumors, T4N0-1 tumors with central extension multifocal tumors with nodule(s) in the same lobe, or stage III disease with mediastinal lymph node involvement.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two recent phase 2 trials, exploring surgical resection preceded by induction chemoradiotherapy for tumors of the superior sulcus, have reported an impressive survival with acceptable mortality rate. They confirm the outcome observed in other prospective and retrospective series for T3-4N0-1. For subsets of T4 NSCLC with central extension or with satellite nodule(s) in the primary lobe, cumulative data suggest that these tumors behave differently than other stage IIIB tumors and might benefit from upfront surgery, possibly followed by postoperative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Whenever clinical mediastinal lymph node invasion is present, surgery after induction treatment is not proven superior to radiotherapy, and is best restricted to clinical trials.

SUMMARY

Combined modality treatment is the standard of care for locally advanced NSCLC and the optimal role for surgery remains a challenging issue for the clinicians.

Tumor thrombus in right atrium from lung adenocarcinoma

We report a case referred for elective surgery to remove an intra-atrial extension of a tumor thrombus. The patient underwent surgical excision of the mass because he would have a high risk of sudden death, pulmonary embolism, or tricuspid obstruction. A histologic examination established the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma metastases.