1
|
López-Castro R, Fuentes-Martín Á, Medina del Valle A, García Peña T, Soro García J, López González L, Cilleruelo Ramos Á. Advances in Immunotherapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: From Emerging Strategies to Translational Insights. OPEN RESPIRATORY ARCHIVES 2024; 6:100323. [PMID: 38660145 PMCID: PMC11041830 DOI: 10.1016/j.opresp.2024.100323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
MPM stands as a rare malignancy necessitating improved therapeutic strategies due to its limited treatment choices and unfavorable prognosis. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has heralded a paradigm shift in the therapeutic landscape of MPM, offering promising avenues across diverse clinical scenarios. In the context of advanced stages of the disease, Immune check-point inhibitors targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-as-sociated protein 4 (CTLA-4), have exhibited encouraging potential in clinical trials, particularly manifesting efficacy among patients exhibiting disease progression following chemotherapy regimens. Innovative combination regimens, exemplified by the concurrent administration of nivolumab and ipilimumab, have demonstrated marked improvement in survival and patient's benefits. A deeper comprehension of the intricate genetic underpinnings of MPM, encompassing key mutations such as cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), neurofibromin 2 (NF2), and BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) mutations, has elucidated novel avenues for targeted therapeutic interventions. This review accentuates the transformative capacity of immunotherapy in revolutionizing the therapeutic outlook for MPM, thereby potentially translating into augmented survival rates and offering glimpses of new approaches on the horizon. Despite the persisting challenges, the synergistic crossroads of interdisciplinary research and collaborative clinical endeavors portend a hopeful landscape for MPM treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Álvaro Fuentes-Martín
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Spain
- Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Spain
| | | | - Tania García Peña
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Spain
| | - José Soro García
- Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Spain
| | | | - Ángel Cilleruelo Ramos
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Spain
- Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Deiana C, Fabbri F, Tavolari S, Palloni A, Brandi G. Improvements in Systemic Therapies for Advanced Malignant Mesothelioma. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:10415. [PMID: 37445594 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241310415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive malignancy associated with poor prognosis and a 5-year survival rate of 12%. Many drugs have been tested over the years with conflicting results. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current therapies in MPM and how to best interpret the data available on these drugs. Furthermore, we focused on promising treatments under investigation, such as immunotherapy with targets different from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, vaccines, target therapies, and metabolism-based strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Deiana
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Fabbri
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Simona Tavolari
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Palloni
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giovanni Brandi
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dumoulin DW, Bironzo P, Passiglia F, Scagliotti GV, Aerts JGJV. Rare thoracic cancers: a comprehensive overview of diagnosis and management of small cell lung cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma and thymic epithelial tumours. Eur Respir Rev 2023; 32:220174. [PMID: 36754434 PMCID: PMC9910338 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0174-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the progress in outcomes seen with immunotherapy in various malignancies, including nonsmall cell lung cancer, the benefits are less in small cell lung cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma and thymic epithelial tumours. New effective treatment options are needed, guided via more in-depth insights into the pathophysiology of these rare malignancies. This review comprehensively presents an overview of the clinical presentation, diagnostic tools, staging systems, pathophysiology and treatment options for these rare thoracic cancers. In addition, opportunities for further improvement of therapies are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne W Dumoulin
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paolo Bironzo
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Francesco Passiglia
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Giorgio V Scagliotti
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guo X, Lin L, Zhu J. Immunotherapy vs. Chemotherapy in Subsequent Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Which Is Better? J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12072531. [PMID: 37048614 PMCID: PMC10095244 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare but aggressive tumor arising from the pleural surface. For relapsed MPM, there is no accepted standard of- are for subsequent treatment. Thus, we aimed to compare the efficacy of chemotherapy, targeting drugs, and immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as subsequent therapy for relapsed MPM. (2) Methods: The study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). We searched several acknowledged databases. Primary outcomes were defined as overall median progressive survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) in different treatment groups. Secondary outcomes were defined as objective response rate (ORR), the proportion of stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). (3) Results: Ultimately, 43 articles were selected for the meta-analysis. According to the results of a pooled analysis of single-arm studies, ICIs showed a slight advantage in mOS, while chemotherapy showed a slight advantage in mPFS (mOS: 11.2 m vs. 10.39 m and mPFS: 4.42 m vs. 5.08 m for ICIs group and chemotherapy group, respectively). We identified only a few studies that directly compared the efficacy of ICIs with that of chemotherapy, and ICIs did not show significant benefits over chemotherapy based on mOS. (4) Conclusions: Based on current evidence, we considered that immunotherapy might not be superior to chemotherapy as a subsequent therapy for relapsed MPM. Although several studies investigated the efficacy of ICIs, targeting drugs, and chemotherapy in relapsed MPM, there was still no standard of care. Further randomized control trials with consistent criteria and outcomes are recommended to guide subsequent therapy in relapsed MPM and identify patients with certain characteristics that might benefit from such subsequent therapy.
Collapse
|
5
|
Nair NU, Jiang Q, Wei JS, Misra VA, Morrow B, Kesserwan C, Hermida LC, Lee JS, Mian I, Zhang J, Lebensohn A, Miettinen M, Sengupta M, Khan J, Ruppin E, Hassan R. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses identify a prognostic gene signature and predict response to therapy in pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma. Cell Rep Med 2023; 4:100938. [PMID: 36773602 PMCID: PMC9975319 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.100938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
Malignant mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. A better understanding of mesothelioma genomics and transcriptomics could advance therapies. Here, we present a mesothelioma cohort of 122 patients along with their germline and tumor whole-exome and tumor RNA sequencing data as well as phenotypic and drug response information. We identify a 48-gene prognostic signature that is highly predictive of mesothelioma patient survival, including CCNB1, the expression of which is highly predictive of patient survival on its own. In addition, we analyze the transcriptomics data to study the tumor immune microenvironment and identify synthetic-lethality-based signatures predictive of response to therapy. This germline and somatic whole-exome sequencing as well as transcriptomics data from the same patient are a valuable resource to address important biological questions, including prognostic biomarkers and determinants of treatment response in mesothelioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nishanth Ulhas Nair
- Cancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Qun Jiang
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | | | - Betsy Morrow
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | - Leandro C Hermida
- Cancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; Tumor Microenvironment Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joo Sang Lee
- Cancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; School of Medicine and Department of Artificial Intelligence, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
| | - Idrees Mian
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Jingli Zhang
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | | | - Manjistha Sengupta
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Javed Khan
- Genetics Branch, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Eytan Ruppin
- Cancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| | - Raffit Hassan
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mark M, Rusakiewicz S, Früh M, Hayoz S, Grosso F, Pless M, Zucali P, Ceresoli G, Maconi A, Schneider M, Froesch P, Tarussio D, Benedetti F, Dagher J, Kandalaft L, von Moos R, Tissot-Renaud S, Schmid S, Metaxas Y. Long-term benefit of lurbinectedin as palliative chemotherapy in progressive malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM): final efficacy and translational data of the SAKK 17/16 study. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100446. [PMID: 35427834 PMCID: PMC9271468 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The SAKK 17/16 study showed promising efficacy data with lurbinectedin as second- or third-line palliative therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Here, we evaluated long-term outcome and analyzed the impact of lurbinectedin monotherapy on the tumor microenvironment at the cellular and molecular level to predict outcomes. Material and methods Forty-two patients were treated with lurbinectedin in this single-arm study. Twenty-nine samples were available at baseline, and seven additional matched samples at day one of cycle two of treatment. Survival curves and rates between groups were compared using the log-rank test and Kaplan–Meier method. Statistical significance was set at P value <0.05. Results Updated median overall survival (OS) was slightly increased to 11.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.8-13.8 months]. Thirty-six patients (85%) had died. The OS rate at 12 and 18 months was 47% (95% CI 32.1% to 61.6%) and 31% (95% CI 17.8% to 45.0%), respectively. Median progression-free survival was 4.1 months (95% CI 2.6-5.5 months). No new safety signals were observed. Patients with lower frequencies of regulatory T cells, as well as lower tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) at baseline, had a better OS. Comparing matched biopsies, a decrease of M2 macrophages was observed in five out of seven patients after exposure to lurbinectedin, and two out of four patients showed increased CD8+ T-cell infiltrates in tumor. Discussion Lurbinectedin continues to be active in patients with progressing malignant pleural mesothelioma. According to our very small sample size, we hypothesize that baseline TAMs and regulatory T cells are associated with survival. Lurbinectedin seems to inhibit conversion of TAMs to M2 phenotype in humans. Lurbinectedin continues to be active in patients with progressing MPM with a median OS of 11.5 months (95% CI 8.8-13.8 months). TAMs and regulatory T cells are associated with survival. Lurbinectedin seems to inhibit conversion of TAMs to M2 phenotype in humans.
Collapse
|
7
|
Zauderer MG, Szlosarek PW, Le Moulec S, Popat S, Taylor P, Planchard D, Scherpereel A, Koczywas M, Forster M, Cameron RB, Peikert T, Argon EK, Michaud NR, Szanto A, Yang J, Chen Y, Kansra V, Agarwal S, Fennell DA. EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat in patients with relapsed or refractory, BAP1-inactivated malignant pleural mesothelioma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:758-767. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00277-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
8
|
Mielgo-Rubio X, Cardeña Gutiérrez A, Sotelo Peña V, Sánchez Becerra MV, González López AM, Rosero A, Trujillo-Reyes JC, Couñago F. Tsunami of immunotherapy reaches mesothelioma. World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13:267-275. [PMID: 35582652 PMCID: PMC9052072 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i4.267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2021] [Revised: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is the most common type of malignant mesothelioma. It is a rare tumor linked to asbestos exposure and is associated with a poor prognosis. Until very recently, patients with advanced or unresectable disease had limited treatment options, primarily based on doublet chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed. In 2020 and 2021, after more than a decade with no major advances or new drugs, two phase III clinical trials published results positioning immunotherapy as a promising option for the first- and second-line treatment of MPM. Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of many cancers and is also showing encouraging results in malignant mesothelioma. Both immune checkpoint inhibition and dual cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 and programmed death-ligand 1 pathway blockade resulted in significantly improved overall survival in randomized phase III trials. In the CheckMate 743 trial, first-line therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab outperformed standard chemotherapy, while in the CONFIRM trial, nivolumab outperformed placebo in patients previously treated with chemotherapy. These two trials represent a major milestone in the treatment of MPM and are set to position immunotherapy as a viable alternative for treatment-naïve patients and patients with progressive disease after chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xabier Mielgo-Rubio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón 28922, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Cardeña Gutiérrez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canarias 38010, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Adriana Rosero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Del Henares, Coslada 28822, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Trujillo-Reyes
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitari de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona 08029, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Pozuelo de Alcorcón 28223, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, Madrid 28003, Spain
- Medicine Department, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón 28670, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pezzicoli G, Rizzo M, Perrone M, Minei S, Mutti L, Porta C. A Glimpse in the Future of Malignant Mesothelioma Treatment. Front Pharmacol 2022; 12:809337. [PMID: 34975505 PMCID: PMC8714955 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.809337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant mesothelioma (MMe) is a rare neoplasm with few therapeutic options available. The landscape of effective therapy for this disease remained unchanged in the last two decades. Recently, however, the introduction of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) led to small, but nevertheless, promising improvements. However, many efforts are still needed to radically improve the prognosis of MMe. In this review, we analyze all those therapeutic strategies for MMe that are still in a preclinical or early clinical phase of development. In particular, we focus on novel antiangiogenic drugs and their possible combination with immunotherapy. Furthermore, we describe also more complex strategies such as microRNA-loaded vectors, oncolytic viruses, and engineered lymphocytes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaetano Pezzicoli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Mimma Rizzo
- A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Martina Perrone
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Silvia Minei
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Luciano Mutti
- Italian Group for Research and Therapy for Mesothelioma (GIMe), Voghera, Italy
| | - Camillo Porta
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.,A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Noguchi R, Yoshimatsu Y, Ono T, Sei A, Motoi N, Yatabe Y, Yoshida Y, Watanabe S, Kondo T. Establishment and characterization of NCC‑DMM1‑C1, a novel patient‑derived cell line of desmoplastic malignant pleural mesothelioma. Oncol Lett 2021; 23:64. [PMID: 35069873 PMCID: PMC8756558 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2021.13182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Desmoplastic malignant pleural mesothelioma (DMM) is a rare histological variant of malignant pleural mesothelioma, which is a highly aggressive neoplasm of the mesothelium. DMM is associated with distant metastases and short survival. Effective treatments for DMM are not established and the development of histotype-tailored treatments is difficult due to the rarity of the disease. Although patient-derived cancer models are crucial tools for the development of novel therapeutics, they are difficult to obtain for DMM; no DMM cell lines or xenografts are available from public biobanks and only two cell lines have been reported. Thus, the present study aimed to establish a novel cell line of DMM as a resource for drug screening. A cell line of DMM was established, designated as NCC-DMM1-C1, using surgically resected tumor tissues from a 73-year-old male patient with DMM. Characteristics of NCC-DMM1-C1 cells were examined, such as growth, spheroid formation and invasion capability. Drug targets and anti-cancer drugs with anti-proliferative efficacy were examined using a comprehensive kinase activity assay and drug screening of 213 anti-cancer agents, respectively. NCC-DMM1-C1 exhibited fast growth, spheroid formation and invasion capability, suggesting that the NCC-DMM1-C1 cells retained the aggressive features of DMM. NCC-DMM1-C1 cells and the tumor tissue shared common activity profiles of kinases, which included FES, Wee1, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β and Src. The drug screening revealed that bortezomib, fostamatinib, gemcitabine, homoharringtonine and vinorelbine had anti-proliferative effects, which have not been previously reported for DMM. It was concluded that NCC-DMM1-C1 cells may be a useful tool for the study of DMM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rei Noguchi
- Division of Rare Cancer Research, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Chuo‑ku, Tokyo 104‑0045, Japan
| | - Yuki Yoshimatsu
- Division of Rare Cancer Research, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Chuo‑ku, Tokyo 104‑0045, Japan
| | - Takuya Ono
- Division of Rare Cancer Research, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Chuo‑ku, Tokyo 104‑0045, Japan
| | - Akane Sei
- Division of Rare Cancer Research, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Chuo‑ku, Tokyo 104‑0045, Japan
| | - Noriko Motoi
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo‑ku, Tokyo 104‑0045, Japan
| | - Yasushi Yatabe
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo‑ku, Tokyo 104‑0045, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Yoshida
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo‑ku, Tokyo 104‑0045, Japan
| | - Shunichi Watanabe
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo‑ku, Tokyo 104‑0045, Japan
| | - Tadashi Kondo
- Division of Rare Cancer Research, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Chuo‑ku, Tokyo 104‑0045, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cui W, Popat S. Pleural mesothelioma (PM) - The status of systemic therapy. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 100:102265. [PMID: 34399145 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Pleural mesothelioma (PM) remains a malignancy with poor prognosis. Despite initial disappointing response rates to single-agent chemotherapy, upfront platinum and anti-folate-based combination chemotherapy has remained the backbone of treatment for PM for the last three decades. The role of maintenance chemotherapy remains unclear; switch-maintenance gemcitabine has shown improvements in progression-free but not overall survival. The addition of antiangiogenic agents to chemotherapy yielded modest improvements in survival, both upfront in combination with platinum-pemetrexed, and in the relapsed setting. Immunotherapy, particularly PD-(L)1 inhibitors, has shown important but variable effectiveness in relapsed PM when used as monotherapy, and is an important salvage treatment after first-line chemotherapy. Furthermore, the randomized phase 3 trial of ipilimumab-nivolumab versus platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy demonstrated improved overall survival favouring ipilimumab-nivolumab (HR 0.74, 96.6% CI 0.60-0.91; p = 0.0020), establishing this regimen as the new standard first-line treatment for PM, particularly in those with non-epithelioid histology. Increased interest in PM genomics has led to development of novel personalized therapeutics, such as those targeting DNA repair and EZH2 pathways, however with variable outcomes in trials. Targeting the membrane glycoprotein mesothelin and arginine deprivation are other important strategies under ongoing investigation. The field of PM is changing and new treatments bring hope to a largely lethal and poor prognostic malignancy. Despite these developments, current challenges include understanding the role of combination and multimodality treatments, drivers of resistance to treatment, and establishing predictive biomarkers to improve patient selection and treatment sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanyuan Cui
- Lung Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sanjay Popat
- Lung Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Thoracic Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jiang Q, Ghafoor A, Mian I, Rathkey D, Thomas A, Alewine C, Sengupta M, Ahlman MA, Zhang J, Morrow B, Steinberg SM, Pastan I, Hassan R. Enhanced efficacy of mesothelin-targeted immunotoxin LMB-100 and anti-PD-1 antibody in patients with mesothelioma and mouse tumor models. Sci Transl Med 2021; 12:12/550/eaaz7252. [PMID: 32611684 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz7252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2019] [Revised: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
LMB-100 is an immunotoxin targeting the cell surface protein mesothelin, which is highly expressed in many cancers including mesothelioma. Having observed that patients receiving pembrolizumab off protocol after LMB-100 treatment had increased tumor responses; we characterized these responses and developed animal models to study whether LMB-100 made tumors more responsive to antibodies blocking programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1). The overall objective tumor response in the 10 patients who received PD-1 inhibitor (pembrolizumab, 9; nivolumab, 1) after progression on LMB-100 was 40%, and the median overall survival was 11.9 months. Of the seven evaluable patients, four had objective tumor responses, including one complete response and three partial responses, and the overall survival for these patients was 39.0+, 27.7, 32.6+, and 13.8 months. When stratified with regard to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, four of five patients with tumor PD-L1 expression had objective tumor response. Patients with positive tumor PD-L1 expression also had increased progression-free survival (11.3 versus 2.1 months, P = 0.0018) compared with those lacking PD-L1 expression. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (27.7 versus 6.8 months, P = 0.1). LMB-100 caused a systemic inflammatory response and recruitment of CD8+ T cells in patients' tumors. The enhanced antitumor effects with LMB-100 plus anti-PD-1 antibody were also observed in a human peripheral blood mononuclear cell-engrafted mesothelioma mouse model and a human mesothelin-expressing syngeneic lung adenocarcinoma mouse model. LMB-100 plus pembrolizumab is now being evaluated in a prospective clinical trial for patients with mesothelioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qun Jiang
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Azam Ghafoor
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Idrees Mian
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Daniel Rathkey
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Anish Thomas
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Christine Alewine
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Manjistha Sengupta
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Mark A Ahlman
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Jingli Zhang
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Betsy Morrow
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Seth M Steinberg
- Biostatistics and Data Management Section, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Ira Pastan
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Raffit Hassan
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ke H, Kao S, Lee K, Takahashi K, Goh HP, Linton A. The minimum standard of care for managing malignant pleural mesothelioma in developing nations within the Asia-Pacific Region. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 18:177-190. [PMID: 34161674 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an incurable malignancy associated with high symptom burden and poor prognosis. The relationship between asbestos exposure and MPM incidence is well-established. The incidence rate of MPM in Australia and New Zealand is among the highest globally. Matching the experience of other nations with legal restrictions on asbestos, incidence is expected to fall. In contrast, the incidence of MPM is rising in the developing nations of the Asia-Pacific as consumption and mining (albeit to a lesser extent) of asbestos continues. The incidence of MPM in these nations is currently low or unknown, reflecting insufficient latency periods since industrial use of asbestos, deficient resources for accurate diagnosis, and lack of occupational disease or cancer registries. The landscape of treatment for MPM is rapidly changing with combination immunotherapy now demonstrating improved survival in the first-line setting. Considering vast global inequity in access to anticancer treatments, establishing minimum standard of care for MPM in developing nations is of greater significance. Here, we review the evidence that form the basis of our minimum-standard recommendations for diagnosis, systemic treatment, management of recurrent pleural effusions, and symptom management. We also briefly review evidence-based treatment that may be considered for those with access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Ke
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Steven Kao
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kenneth Lee
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ken Takahashi
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan
| | - Hui Poh Goh
- PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei
| | - Anthony Linton
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Parikh K, Hendriks LEL, Bironzo P, Remon J. Immune checkpoint inhibitors a new player in the therapeutic game of mesothelioma: New reality with new challenges. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 99:102250. [PMID: 34174669 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Revised: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and orphan thoracic malignancy, with a poor prognosis as the majority of patients are diagnosed with unresectable MPM, with no significant improvements in the therapeutic strategy for over a decade. However, the recent approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in treatment-naïve patients with unresectable MPM marks a significant step forward and hope for the treatment of this disease. In this narrative review, we discuss the biological rationale to use ICI in the treatment of MPM. We summarize the current evidence for the efficacy of ICI in MPM and discuss several unresolved challenges regarding the use of ICI in this disease, such as the best upfront immune approach in MPM (ICI versus ICI plus chemotherapy), the optimal sequential treatment strategy according to the first-line treatment, and the potential role of predictive biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaushal Parikh
- Department of Medical Oncology, John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Lizza E L Hendriks
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Paolo Bironzo
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Jordi Remon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (HM-CIOCC), Hospital HM Delfos, HM Hospitales, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Metro G, Signorelli D, Pizzutilo EG, Giannetta L, Cerea G, Garaffa M, Friedlaender A, Addeo A, Mandarano M, Bellezza G, Roila F. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:2972-2980. [PMID: 34003722 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1917933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive disease with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 10%. Recent data suggest that MPM is an immunologically active tumor, in which checkpoint inhibition through the blockade of the anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (-CTLA-4) or anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) could play a major therapeutic role. Initially, clinical trials evaluated immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the salvage setting after platinum-based chemotherapy with mixed results in terms of efficacy. More recently, the combination of the anti-CTLA-4 agent ipilimumab plus the anti-PD-1 agent nivolumab was tested in the front-line setting, and reported a superior survival as compared to platinum/pemetrexed. While other clinical trials ore ongoing in order to investigate ICIs for MPM, it seems now evident that we have entered a new "era" for the treatment of MPM. In the future, a few issues need to be solved with regard to the use of ICIs for MPM. Among them, there is the identification of biomarkers of sensitivity to immunotherapy that may help enrich the patient population who could benefit the most from treatment, while avoiding for some other patients the potential occurrence of immune-related side effects from therapies that are anticipated to be ineffective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Metro
- Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Diego Signorelli
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - Elio G Pizzutilo
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - Laura Giannetta
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - Giulio Cerea
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - Miriam Garaffa
- Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Alex Friedlaender
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alfredo Addeo
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Martina Mandarano
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Division of Pathology and Histology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Guido Bellezza
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Division of Pathology and Histology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Fausto Roila
- Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Medical Oncology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Karunakaran KB, Yanamala N, Boyce G, Becich MJ, Ganapathiraju MK. Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Interactome with 364 Novel Protein-Protein Interactions. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1660. [PMID: 33916178 PMCID: PMC8037232 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive cancer affecting the outer lining of the lung, with a median survival of less than one year. We constructed an 'MPM interactome' with over 300 computationally predicted protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and over 2400 known PPIs of 62 literature-curated genes whose activity affects MPM. Known PPIs of the 62 MPM associated genes were derived from Biological General Repository for Interaction Datasets (BioGRID) and Human Protein Reference Database (HPRD). Novel PPIs were predicted by applying the HiPPIP algorithm, which computes features of protein pairs such as cellular localization, molecular function, biological process membership, genomic location of the gene, and gene expression in microarray experiments, and classifies the pairwise features as interacting or non-interacting based on a random forest model. We validated five novel predicted PPIs experimentally. The interactome is significantly enriched with genes differentially ex-pressed in MPM tumors compared with normal pleura and with other thoracic tumors, genes whose high expression has been correlated with unfavorable prognosis in lung cancer, genes differentially expressed on crocidolite exposure, and exosome-derived proteins identified from malignant mesothelioma cell lines. 28 of the interactors of MPM proteins are targets of 147 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs. By comparing disease-associated versus drug-induced differential expression profiles, we identified five potentially repurposable drugs, namely cabazitaxel, primaquine, pyrimethamine, trimethoprim and gliclazide. Preclinical studies may be con-ducted in vitro to validate these computational results. Interactome analysis of disease-associated genes is a powerful approach with high translational impact. It shows how MPM-associated genes identified by various high throughput studies are functionally linked, leading to clinically translatable results such as repurposed drugs. The PPIs are made available on a webserver with interactive user interface, visualization and advanced search capabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalyani B. Karunakaran
- Supercomputer Education and Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India;
| | - Naveena Yanamala
- Exposure Assessment Branch, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Center for Disease Control, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA; (N.Y.); (G.B.)
| | - Gregory Boyce
- Exposure Assessment Branch, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Center for Disease Control, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA; (N.Y.); (G.B.)
| | - Michael J. Becich
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA;
| | - Madhavi K. Ganapathiraju
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA;
- Intelligent Systems Program, School of Computing and Information, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schumann SO, Kocher G, Minervini F. Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of the malignant pleural mesothelioma, a narrative review of literature. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:2510-2523. [PMID: 34012597 PMCID: PMC8107529 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-2761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The malignant pleural mesothelioma is a very aggressive tumor which is arising from mesothelial cells and is associated with asbestos exposure. It is a heterogeneous cancer that shows a complex pattern of molecular changes, including genetic, chromosomic, and epigenetic abnormalities. The malignant pleural mesothelioma is characterized by a silent and slow clinical progression with an average period of 20–40 years from the asbestos exposure phase to the start of the symptoms. Unfortunately, to date, the therapeutic options are very limited, especially if the tumor is detected late. This narrative review provides an extended overview of the present evidence in the literature regarding the epidemiology, diagnostic pathways and treatment approaches of the malignant pleural mesothelioma. The treatment of mesothelioma has evolved slowly over the last 20 years not only from a surgical point of view but also radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy play nowadays a key role. Several surgical strategies are available ranging from extrapleural pneumonectomy to cytoreductive surgery but a multidisciplinary approach seems to be mandatory because a single approach has not proved to date to be resolutive. New non-surgical treatment options appear to be promising but the results have to be taken in account with caution because clear evidence with high-quality studies is still lacking
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gregor Kocher
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Fabrizio Minervini
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zucali PA, Perrino M, De Vincenzo F, Giordano L, Cordua N, D'Antonio F, Santoro A. A phase II study of the combination of gemcitabine and imatinib mesylate in pemetrexed-pretreated patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Lung Cancer 2020; 142:132-137. [PMID: 32102735 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Second-line chemotherapy is not a standard of care in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) that progresses after first-line treatment with cisplatin and pemetrexed. In pre-clinical models, the combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and imatinib mesylate (IM), compared with GEM alone, led to a further tumor growth inhibition and improved survival. This phase II study evaluates the antitumor activity of a combination of IM and GEM in platinum-pemetrexed-pretreated MPM patients expressing PDGFR-β and/or cKIT by immunohistochemistry (IHC). PATIENTS AND METHODS GEM (1000 mg/m2) was given on days 3 and 10; IM (400 mg) was taken orally on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was the 3-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The study follows the optimal two-stage design of Simon. A 3-month PFS target of 75 % was required. With a probability error α = 10 % and a power of 80 %, the calculated sample size was 22 patients. In particular, in the first step, six out of nine patients and globally 14/22 patients free from progressive disease at 3 months were required. Secondary endpoints included response rate, duration of response, toxicity and overall survival (OS). RESULTS In total, 23 patients were enrolled (ECOG PS 0-1/2: 9/13; one previous line/≥two previous lines: 10/13). Partial response was achieved in four patients (17.4 %) and stable disease in 11 (47.8 %) with a disease control rate of 65.3 %. After a median follow-up of 34.5 months, median PFS and OS were 2.8 and 5.7 months, respectively. The 3-month PFS rate was 39.1 % (9/23 patients). All-grade drug-related adverse events occurred in 17 (73.9 %) patients. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were observed in four (17 %) patients. CONCLUSIONS The combination of IM and GEM is well tolerated in platinum-pemetrexed-pretreated MPM patients expressing PDGFR-β and/or cKIT by IHC, but it does not show a significant PFS benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Andrea Zucali
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Matteo Perrino
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Fabio De Vincenzo
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Laura Giordano
- Biostatistic Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Nadia Cordua
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Federica D'Antonio
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Armando Santoro
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Metaxas Y, Früh M, Eboulet EI, Grosso F, Pless M, Zucali PA, Ceresoli GL, Mark M, Schneider M, Maconi A, Perrino M, Biaggi-Rudolf C, Froesch P, Schmid S, Waibel C, Appenzeller C, Rauch D, von Moos R. Lurbinectedin as second- or third-line palliative therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma: an international, multi-centre, single-arm, phase II trial (SAKK 17/16). Ann Oncol 2020; 31:495-500. [PMID: 32085891 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic second- and third-line therapies for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) result in a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of <2 months and median overall survival (mOS) of 6-9 months. Lurbinectedin binds to the DNA of the regulatory region while inhibiting tumour-associated macrophage transcription. In early trials, encouraging outcomes occurred in patients (pts) with MPM treated with lurbinectedin. We aimed to generate lurbinectedin efficacy and safety data among pts with progressive MPM. PATIENTS AND METHODS Pts with progressing MPM treated with first-line platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy received lurbinectedin monotherapy. Treatment was given intravenously at 3.2 mg/m2 dose every 3 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Using Simon's two-stage design, the primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 weeks (PFS12wks), was met if achieved by ≥21 pts (p0 ≤35% versus p1 ≥55%). RESULTS Forty-two pts from nine centres across Switzerland and Italy were recruited. Histology was epithelioid in 33 cases, sarcomatoid in 5, and biphasic in 4. Overall 10/42 (23.8%) underwent prior immunotherapy and 14/42 (33.3%) had progressed ≤6 months after first-line chemotherapy. At data cut-off PFS12wks was met by 22/42 pts (52.4%; 90% confidence interval (CI): 38.7% to 63.5%; P = 0.015) with an mPFS of 4.1 months and mOS of 11.1 months. The best response was complete and partial remission observed in one patient each and stable disease in 20 pts. The duration of disease control was 6.6 months (95% CI: 5.2-7.4). No significant difference in PFS12wks, mPFS, and mOS was recorded in epithelioid versus non-epithelioid cases and pts with prior immunotherapy versus those without. Similar mPFS but shorter mOS were observed among pts who progressed within ≤6 months after first-line chemotherapy. Lurbinectedin-related grade 3-4 toxicity was seen in 21 pts, mostly being neutropenia (23.8%) and fatigue (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS The primary efficacy endpoint was reached with acceptable toxicity. Lurbinectedin showed promising activity regardless of histology, prior immunotherapy, or outcome on prior treatment. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER NCT03213301.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Metaxas
- Department of Oncology/Haematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland.
| | - M Früh
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - F Grosso
- Mesothelioma Unit - Oncology, SS. Antonio and C. Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy
| | - M Pless
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - P A Zucali
- Humanitas Cancer Centre, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - G L Ceresoli
- Oncology Unit, Humanitas Clinic Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - M Mark
- Department of Oncology/Haematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | | | - A Maconi
- Scientific Research and Development Department, SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, General Hospital, Alessandria, Italy
| | - M Perrino
- Humanitas Cancer Centre, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | - P Froesch
- Department of Oncology, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - S Schmid
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - C Waibel
- Division of Haematology and Oncology, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | - C Appenzeller
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - D Rauch
- Oncology Centre, Hospital STS AG, Thun, Switzerland
| | - R von Moos
- Department of Oncology/Haematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ceresoli GL, Rossi A. Approved and emerging treatments of malignant pleural mesothelioma in elderly patients. Expert Rev Respir Med 2019; 13:1179-1188. [PMID: 31596154 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2019.1678386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare neoplasm with asbestos exposure as the dominant etiologic agent. Owing to the long latent period following exposure, MPM is often diagnosed late in life. Despite this, elderly patients are under-represented in clinical trials. To date, data regarding the tolerability and efficacy of anticancer treatments for elderly patients affected by MPM are still lacking.Areas covered: The current state-of-the-art of approved treatments employed in the treatment of MPM elderly patients is reviewed and discussed, with a look to emerging therapies. A structured search of bibliographic databases for peer-reviewed research literature and of main meeting abstracts using a focused review question was undertaken.Expert opinion: Even though the median age of MPM patients enrolled in the most recent experimental trials is increasing, no specific analysis has been reported so far in the elderly. Moreover, no data are available for the 'oldest of the elderly' (>75 years). Treatment of elderly patients with MPM is one of the major challenges to the clinician. There is a clear need of large, well-conducted retrospective studies and above all of prospective investigations in this patient population, both in the first-and in the second-line setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Luca Ceresoli
- Division of Medical Oncology, Thoracic and Urologic Oncology Unit, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Antonio Rossi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo (FG), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Biersack B. Interplay of non-coding RNAs and approved antimetabolites such as gemcitabine and pemetrexed in mesothelioma. Noncoding RNA Res 2018; 3:213-225. [PMID: 30809600 PMCID: PMC6257890 DOI: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2018.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Revised: 11/03/2018] [Accepted: 11/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Gemcitabine and pemetrexed are clinically approved antimetabolites for the therapy of mesothelioma diseases. These drugs are often applied in combination with platinum complexes and other drugs. The activity of antimetabolites depended on the expression levels of certain non-coding RNAs, in particular, of small microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). The development of tumor resistance towards antimetabolites was regulated by non-coding RNAs. An overview of the interplay between gemcitabine/pemetrexed antimetabolites and non-coding RNAs in mesothelioma is provided. Further to this, various non-coding RNA-modulating agents are discussed which displayed positive effects on gemcitabine or pemetrexed treatment of mesothelioma diseases. A detailed knowledge of the connections of non-coding RNAs with antimetabolites will be constructive for the design of improved therapies in future.
Collapse
Key Words
- AKBA, 3-acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid
- Anticancer drugs
- Bcl-2, B-cell lymphoma 2
- DADS, diallyl sulfide
- DHA, docosahexaenoic acid
- DIM, 3,3‘-diindolylmethane
- DMPM, diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma
- EGCG, epigallocatechin-3-gallate
- EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition
- Gemcitabine
- HOTAIR, HOX transcript antisense RNA
- I3C, indole-3-carbinol
- Long non-coding RNA
- MALAT1, metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1
- MPM, malignant pleural mesothelioma
- Mesothelioma
- MicroRNA
- NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer
- NaB, sodium butyrate
- PDCD4, programmed cell death 4
- PEG, polyethylene glycole
- PEITC, phenethylisothiocyanate
- PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog
- Pemetrexed
- RA, retinoic acid
- SAHA, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid
- SFN, sulforaphane
- TSA, trichostatin A
Collapse
|
22
|
Tsao AS, Lindwasser OW, Adjei AA, Adusumilli PS, Beyers ML, Blumenthal GM, Bueno R, Burt BM, Carbone M, Dahlberg SE, de Perrot M, Fennell DA, Friedberg J, Gill RR, Gomez DR, Harpole DH, Hassan R, Hesdorffer M, Hirsch FR, Hmeljak J, Kindler HL, Korn EL, Liu G, Mansfield AS, Nowak AK, Pass HI, Peikert T, Rimner A, Robinson BWS, Rosenzweig KE, Rusch VW, Salgia R, Sepesi B, Simone CB, Sridhara R, Szlosarek P, Taioli E, Tsao MS, Yang H, Zauderer MG, Malik SM. Current and Future Management of Malignant Mesothelioma: A Consensus Report from the National Cancer Institute Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation. J Thorac Oncol 2018; 13:1655-1667. [PMID: 30266660 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.2036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
On March 28- 29, 2017, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Thoracic Malignacy Steering Committee, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation convened the NCI-International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer- Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation Mesothelioma Clinical Trials Planning Meeting in Bethesda, Maryland. The goal of the meeting was to bring together lead academicians, clinicians, scientists, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to focus on the development of clinical trials for patients in whom malignant pleural mesothelioma has been diagnosed. In light of the discovery of new cancer targets affecting the clinical development of novel agents and immunotherapies in malignant mesothelioma, the objective of this meeting was to assemble a consensus on at least two or three practice-changing multimodality clinical trials to be conducted through NCI's National Clinical Trials Network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne S Tsao
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - O Wolf Lindwasser
- Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Alex A Adjei
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Raphael Bueno
- Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bryan M Burt
- Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Suzanne E Dahlberg
- Department of Biostatistics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marc de Perrot
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dean A Fennell
- Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Friedberg
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Maryland Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ritu R Gill
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David H Harpole
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Raffit Hassan
- Thoracic and GI Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Mary Hesdorffer
- Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, Virginia
| | - Fred R Hirsch
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, IASLC, Denver, Colorado
| | | | - Hedy L Kindler
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Edward L Korn
- Biometric Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Geoffrey Liu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Anna K Nowak
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; National Center for Asbestos Related Diseases, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Harvey I Pass
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University, Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Tobias Peikert
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bruce W S Robinson
- National Centre for Asbestos Related Disease, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kenneth E Rosenzweig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ravi Salgia
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - Boris Sepesi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Peter Szlosarek
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emanuela Taioli
- Epidemiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Ming-Sound Tsao
- Department of Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pathology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Haining Yang
- Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Marjorie G Zauderer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Shakun M Malik
- Clinical Investigations Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
A systematic review and meta-analysis of second-line therapies for treatment of mesothelioma. Respir Med 2018; 141:72-80. [PMID: 30053976 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2018] [Revised: 06/23/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is generally treated with platinum/pemetrexed-based first-line therapy. Once the disease progresses, evidence for the efficacy of palliative treatments is lacking, and platinum re-challenge or single-agent chemotherapy are commonly used. To assess the effects of cytostatic or targeted therapy for treating MPM, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched to identify published articles on second-line treatments for recurrent or advanced mesothelioma. Inclusion criteria were publication in the English language, describing clinical trials with 20 or more patients, and evaluability for efficacy and for receiving second-line systemic therapies. Data were pooled using number of events/number of evaluable patients, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), according to a fixed or random effect model. Pooled median OS was the primary endpoint. RESULTS A total of 49 eligible studies (n = 3938 patients; range, 12-400) were identified. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months (95%CI 2.87-3.93). Median pooled OS was 7.86 (95%CI 7.01-8.72). The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 8.63% (95%CI 6-11.26), and the pooled disease control rate (DCR) was 54.8% (95%CI 48.9-60.6). Median pooled OS with platinum- and pemetrexed-based chemotherapy were 7.93 and 7.78 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS There remains uncertainty about the ideal second-line agent for MPM. Based on this meta-analysis, palliative chemotherapy or other experimental agents can be considered for patients with MPM who desire further treatment after their disease has progressed, during or after first-line therapy.
Collapse
|
24
|
Kindler HL, Ismaila N, Armato SG, Bueno R, Hesdorffer M, Jahan T, Jones CM, Miettinen M, Pass H, Rimner A, Rusch V, Sterman D, Thomas A, Hassan R. Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:1343-1373. [PMID: 29346042 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.76.6394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 265] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, pathology, imaging, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1990 through 2017. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. Results The literature search identified 222 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Recommendations Evidence-based recommendations were developed for diagnosis, staging, chemotherapy, surgical cytoreduction, radiation therapy, and multimodality therapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hedy L Kindler
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Samuel G Armato
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Raphael Bueno
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mary Hesdorffer
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Thierry Jahan
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Clyde Michael Jones
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Markku Miettinen
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Harvey Pass
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Valerie Rusch
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniel Sterman
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anish Thomas
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Raffit Hassan
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Petrini I, Lucchesi M, Puppo G, Chella A. Medical treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma relapses. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:S333-S341. [PMID: 29507803 PMCID: PMC5830550 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.10.159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
There are not established treatments for patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma that progressed after first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed. Retrospective analyses suggest a possible role for rechallenge with pemetrexed for selected patients. Phase II trials demonstrate a modest efficacy of vinorelbine monotherapy with a response rate ranging between 0% and 18% and a tolerable toxicity profile. Combination schedules, despite an increased toxicity, fail to demonstrate an improved efficacy. To date, genome wide analyses did not show molecular targets suitable for therapy and biological drugs did not exert a significant efficacy in clinical trials. Immunotherapy has given a hint of efficacy in early clinical trials but definitive evaluations are still ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iacopo Petrini
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- General Pathology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Maurizio Lucchesi
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Puppo
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Antonio Chella
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sobhani N, Corona SP, Bonazza D, Ianza A, Pivetta T, Roviello G, Cortale M, Guglielmi A, Zanconati F, Generali D. Advances in systemic therapy for malignant mesothelioma: future perspectives. Future Oncol 2017; 13:2083-2101. [PMID: 28984470 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive form of cancer affecting the mesothelium. This mainly occupational disease is becoming more common in those countries where asbestos has been used for industrial applications. Notwithstanding the progress made in the field, patients do not survive more than 12 months on average with standard treatment. With the advent of next generation sequencing, it is now possible to study the mutational landscape of each tumor with the aim of identifying the genetic aberrations driving tumorigenesis. This review encompasses the latest research in the field, with particular attention to new chemotherapy combinatorial regimens, molecular targets and immunotherapies, providing a comprehensive picture of the current and future treatment options for malignant mesothelioma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navid Sobhani
- Department of Medical, Surgical, & Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazza Ospitale 1 34129 Trieste, Italy.,Department of Medical, Surgical, & Health Sciences, Teaching Hospital of Cattinara, University of Trieste, Via Fiume 447, 34129 Trieste, Italy
| | - Silvia Paola Corona
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Moorabbin Campus, 823-865 Centre Rd, Bentleigh East VIC 3165, Australia
| | - Deborah Bonazza
- Department of Medical, Surgical, & Health Sciences, Teaching Hospital of Cattinara, University of Trieste, Via Fiume 447, 34129 Trieste, Italy
| | - Anna Ianza
- Department of Medical, Surgical, & Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazza Ospitale 1 34129 Trieste, Italy
| | - Tania Pivetta
- Department of Medical, Surgical, & Health Sciences, Teaching Hospital of Cattinara, University of Trieste, Via Fiume 447, 34129 Trieste, Italy
| | | | - Maurizio Cortale
- Department of Medical, Surgical, & Health Sciences, Teaching Hospital of Cattinara, University of Trieste, Via Fiume 447, 34129 Trieste, Italy
| | - Alessandra Guglielmi
- Department of Medical, Surgical, & Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazza Ospitale 1 34129 Trieste, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Zanconati
- Department of Medical, Surgical, & Health Sciences, Teaching Hospital of Cattinara, University of Trieste, Via Fiume 447, 34129 Trieste, Italy
| | - Daniele Generali
- Department of Medical, Surgical, & Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazza Ospitale 1 34129 Trieste, Italy.,Breast Cancer Unit, ASST Cremona, Viale Concordia 1, 26100, Cremona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hillerdal CO, Ötvös R, Szatmári T, Own SA, Hillerdal G, Dackland ÅL, Dobra K, Hjerpe A. Ex vivo evaluation of tumor cell specific drug responses in malignant pleural effusions. Oncotarget 2017; 8:82885-82896. [PMID: 29137310 PMCID: PMC5669936 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2016] [Accepted: 08/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The effect of chemotherapy may be improved by combining the most effective drugs based on testing the sensitivity of the individual tumor ex vivo. Such estimations of tumor cells from effusions have so far not been implemented in the clinical routine as a basis for individualized choice of therapy. One obstacle for such analyses is the admixture of benign cells that might obscure the results. In this paper we test and compare two ways of performing the analysis specifically on tumor cells. First we enrich the tumor cells, using antibody labeled magnetic separation, and measure the effects of subsequent drug exposure with the metabolic activity assays WST-1 and alamar blue. The second way of estimating drug effects specifically on tumor cells employs multi parameter flow cytometry, measuring apoptosis with the propidium iodide / AnnexinV technique and, particularly for pemetrexed, possible effects on cell cycle progression in immunologically identified tumor cells. The two techniques produce similar results, indicating a possible use in personalized medicine. The possible predictive role of the analysis remains to be shown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl-Olof Hillerdal
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rita Ötvös
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tünde Szatmári
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sulaf Abd Own
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gunnar Hillerdal
- Gävle Hospital, Department of Lung Medicine, 803 24 Gävle, Sweden
| | - Åsa-Lena Dackland
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Katalin Dobra
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Hjerpe
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zauderer MG. Standard Chemotherapy Options and Clinical Trials of Novel Agents for Mesothelioma. ASBESTOS AND MESOTHELIOMA 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-53560-9_15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
29
|
Chiu LY, Hsin IL, Yang TY, Sung WW, Chi JY, Chang JT, Ko JL, Sheu GT. The ERK-ZEB1 pathway mediates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pemetrexed resistant lung cancer cells with suppression by vinca alkaloids. Oncogene 2016; 36:242-253. [PMID: 27270426 PMCID: PMC5241427 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2016.195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2015] [Revised: 04/21/2016] [Accepted: 04/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
High thymidylate synthase (TS) level in cancer tissue is considered to result in resistance to pemetrexed therapy for advanced stages of nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancers. To further investigate the mechanism of pemetrexed resistance and potential prognostic outcomes in lung cancer, we established pemetrexed-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cell sublines from CL1 harboring a mutated TP53 gene (R248W) and A549 harboring wild-type TP53. We found the TS expression is upregulated in both pemetrexed-resistant sublines and the reduced TS level achieved through shRNA inhibition resulted in higher pemetrexed sensitivity. We also demonstrated that the acquisitions of pemetrexed resistance enhances epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in vivo with a mice animal model and in vitro with CL1 and A549 sublines, which was associated with upregulation of ZEB1 which, in turn, downregulates E-cadherin and upregulates fibronectin. When ERK1/2 phosphorylation was reduced by an inhibitor (U0126) or siRNA inhibition, both pemetrexed-resistant sublines reduced their migration and invasion abilities. Therefore, the ERK-mediated pathways induce apoptosis with pemetrexed treatment, and may in turn mediate EMT when cancer cells are resistant to pemetrexed. We further demonstrated that the growth of pemetrexed-resistant tumors could be inhibited by vinblastine in vivo and vincristine in vitro. Our data indicate that pemetrexed resistance could be relieved by non-cross-resistant chemotherapeutic drugs such as vinca alkaloids and might be independent to TP53 status. Furthermore, the phosphorylation of ERK was reduced by vincristine. This finding provides a new insight for overcoming pemetrexed resistance and metastasis by application of vinca alkaloids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L-Y Chiu
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - I-L Hsin
- Inflammation Research and Drug Development Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - T-Y Yang
- Division of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - W-W Sung
- School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Education, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Technology, Jen-Teh Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management, Miaoli, Taiwan
| | - J-Y Chi
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - J T Chang
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - J-L Ko
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Oncology and Chest Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - G-T Sheu
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Oncology and Chest Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Maggioni C, Barletta G, Rijavec E, Biello F, Gualco E, Grossi F. Advances in treatment of mesothelioma. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2016; 17:1197-205. [DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2016.1176145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
31
|
A phase Ia/Ib clinical trial of metronomic chemotherapy based on a mathematical model of oral vinorelbine in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma: rationale and study protocol. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:278. [PMID: 27094927 PMCID: PMC4837593 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2308-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2015] [Accepted: 04/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Metronomic oral vinorelbine is effective in metastatic NSCLC and malignant pleural mesothelioma, but all the studies published thus far were based upon a variety of empirical and possibly suboptimal schedules, with inconsistent results. Mathematical modelling showed by simulation that a new metronomic protocol could lead to a better safety and efficacy profile. Design This phase Ia/Ib trial was designed to confirm safety (phase Ia) and evaluate efficacy (phase Ib) of a new metronomic oral vinorelbine schedule. Patients with metastatic NSCLC or malignant pleural mesothelioma in whom standard treatments failed and who exhibited ECOG performance status 0–2 and adequate organ function will be eligible. Our mathematical PK-PD model suggested an alternative weekly D1, D2 and D4 schedule (named Vinorelbine Theoretical Protocol) with a respective dose of 60, 30 and 60 mg. Trial recruitment will be two-staged, as 12 patients are planned to participate in phase Ia to confirm safety and consolidate the calibration of the model parameters. Depending on the phase Ia results and after a favourable decision from a consultative committee, the extension phase (phase Ib) will be an efficacy study including 20 patients who will receive the Optimal Vinorelbine Theoretical Protocol. The primary endpoint is the tolerance (assessed by CTC v4.0) for the phase Ia and the objective response according to RECIST 1.1 for phase Ib. An ancillary study on circulating angiogenesis biomarkers will be a subproject of the trial. Discussion This ongoing trial is the first to prospectively test a mathematically optimized schedule in metronomic chemotherapy. As such, this trial can be considered as a proof-of-concept study demonstrating the feasibility to run a computational-driven protocol to ensure an optimal efficacy/toxicity balance in patients with cancer. Trial registration EudraCT N°: 2015-000138-31
Collapse
|
32
|
Vinca alkaloids in the therapeutic management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Cancer Treat Rev 2015; 41:853-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2015] [Revised: 10/17/2015] [Accepted: 10/22/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
33
|
Nowak AK, Lesterhuis-Vasbinder D, Lesterhuis WJ. New directions in mesothelioma treatment. Lung Cancer Manag 2015. [DOI: 10.2217/lmt.15.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
For most patients with mesothelioma, symptom control and palliative chemotherapy are mainstays of care. First-line cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy has demonstrated survival and quality-of-life benefits. A randomized controlled trial adding bevacizumab to cisplatin and pemetrexed recently reported improved survival and time to progression, and may constitute a new standard of care where economically viable. Immunotherapy is under active investigation and positive results have been reported from single-arm studies of the anti-CTLA4 antibody tremelimumab; the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab; and mesothelin-targeting strategies. Symptom control remains critical for patient well-being, and includes management of pleural effusion, analgesia, treatment of symptomatic masses and management of systemic symptoms. There is increasing evidence that tunneled pleural catheters are preferred over talc pleurodesis for recurrent pleural effusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna K Nowak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Ave, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
- School of Medicine & Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, M503 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
- National Research Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, M503 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Dorit Lesterhuis-Vasbinder
- School of Medicine & Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, M503 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
- National Research Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, M503 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Willem Joost Lesterhuis
- School of Medicine & Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, M503 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
- National Research Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, M503 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Raynaud C, Greillier L, Mazieres J, Monnet I, Mastroianni B, Robinet G, Fraboulet G, Dixmier A, Berard H, Lamy R, Letreut J, Lena H, Oliviero G, Botta S, Vergnenegre A, Borget I, Chouaid C. Management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a French multicenter retrospective study (GFPC 0802 study). BMC Cancer 2015; 15:857. [PMID: 26546402 PMCID: PMC4635998 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1881-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2015] [Accepted: 10/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease with poor prognosis in spite of significant improvement in survival, due to new chemotherapy regimens. We describe here patients' profiles and management in daily practice in France. METHODS Observational retrospective study. Data were collected from medical files. All patients with histologically proven MPM diagnosed from January 2005 to December 2008 were included in the participating sites. RESULTS Four hundred and six patients were included in 37 sites: mean age 68.9 ± 9.8 years, male predominance (sex ratio 3.27), latency of the disease 45.7 years, epithelioïd type 83 %. Diagnosis was made using thoracoscopy in 80.8 % of patients. Radical surgery was performed in 6.2 % of cases. Chemotherapy was administered to 74.6 % of patients. First line regimens consisted mainly of platinum + pemetrexed (91 %) or pemetrexed alone (7 %). Objective response rate was 17.2 % and another 41.6 % of patients experienced disease stabilization. Half of these patients underwent second line chemotherapy (platinium + pemetrexed 31.6 %, pemetrexed alone 24.6 %), resulting in a 6 % response rate. Third-line chemotherapy (56 patients) yielded disease control in 5.4 % of cases. CONCLUSIONS The management of MPM in France is usually in accordance with guidelines. Response rates are somewhat lower than those described in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Raynaud
- Service de Pneumologie, CH Argenteuil, Argenteuil, France.
| | - L Greillier
- Service d'oncologie thoracique, APHM, Marseille, Services de Pneumologie, Marseille, France.
| | | | - I Monnet
- Service de pneumologie, CHI Créteil, 40 avenue de verdun, 94010, Créteil, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - R Lamy
- CH Lorient, Lorient, France.
| | - J Letreut
- CH Aix en Provence, Aix en Provence, France.
| | - H Lena
- CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
| | | | | | | | | | - C Chouaid
- Service de pneumologie, CHI Créteil, 40 avenue de verdun, 94010, Créteil, France.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Systemic Approach to Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: What News of Chemotherapy, Targeted Agents and Immunotherapy? TUMORI JOURNAL 2015; 102:18-30. [DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare cancer with a cause-effect relationship to asbestos exposure. The prognosis is poor and chemotherapy seems the best treatment option. In the last two decades a deeper understanding of mesothelioma carcinogenesis and invasiveness mechanisms has prompted research efforts to test new agents in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, but the results have been modest. Attractive preclinical data disappointed in subsequent experimental phases. Other promising agents failed to improve patient outcomes due to high toxicity. Interesting suggestions have come from preliminary data on immunotherapy. Several trials are ongoing and the results are eagerly awaited. The aim of this review is to discuss the most recent news on systemic therapy for advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Collapse
|
36
|
Remon J, Reguart N, Corral J, Lianes P. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: new hope in the horizon with novel therapeutic strategies. Cancer Treat Rev 2014; 41:27-34. [PMID: 25467107 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2014] [Revised: 10/26/2014] [Accepted: 10/28/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare but aggressive malignancy of the pleura, with a strong causal link to asbestos exposure. MPM incidence has been increasing in recent years and it is not expected to fall off in the next two decades. Prognosis of MPM patients is modest since the vast majority of patients are diagnosed at advanced stage and because platinum-based chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment, with no standard second line treatment. Most current efforts to improve outcomes are based on a better understanding of the stromal compartment and deregulated pathways leading ultimately to the design of clinical trials based on novel therapeutic approaches such as immunotherapy or molecular-directed compounds. This review seeks to update the last clinical trials investigating novel agents in unresectable MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Remon
- Hospital de Mataró, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - J Corral
- Hospital Universitario Vírgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
| | - P Lianes
- Hospital de Mataró, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ai J, Stevenson JP. Current issues in malignant pleural mesothelioma evaluation and management. Oncologist 2014; 19:975-84. [PMID: 25061089 PMCID: PMC4153452 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2014] [Accepted: 06/11/2014] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an uncommon disease most often associated with occupational asbestos exposure and is steadily increasing in worldwide incidence. Patients typically present at an older age, with advanced clinical stage and other medical comorbidities, making management quite challenging. Despite great efforts, the prognosis of MPM remains poor, especially at progression after initial treatment. Macroscopic complete resection of MPM can be achieved through extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or extended (ie, radical) pleurectomy (e-P/D) in selected patients and can result in prolonged survival when incorporated into a multimodality approach. Given the morbidity associated with surgical resection of MPM, optimizing identification of appropriate patients is essential. Unfortunately, most patients are not candidates for EPP or e-P/D due to advanced stage, age, and/or medical comorbidity. Pemetrexed and platinum combination chemotherapy has become the cornerstone of therapy for patients with unresectable disease because the combination is associated with improved survival and quality of life in treated patients. However, MPM eventually becomes resistant to initial therapy, and benefit to further lines of therapy has not been substantiated in randomized clinical trials. Translational research has provided exciting insights into tumorigenesis, biomarkers, and immune response in MPM, leading to the development of multiple novel therapeutic agents that are currently in clinical trials. These advances hold the promise of a new era in the treatment of MPM and suggest that this disease will not be left behind in the war on cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Ai
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - James P Stevenson
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zauderer MG, Kass SL, Woo K, Sima CS, Ginsberg MS, Krug LM. Vinorelbine and gemcitabine as second- or third-line therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Lung Cancer 2014; 84:271-4. [PMID: 24690410 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2013] [Revised: 01/07/2014] [Accepted: 03/04/2014] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pemetrexed-cisplatin is the only FDA-approved regimen for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), and the impact on survival is modest. No drugs have been shown to improve survival as second-line therapy, yet vinorelbine and gemcitabine are prescribed based on the results of small phase II trials. To augment the existing limited data, we examined our institutional experience with vinorelbine and gemcitabine in patients with previously treated MPM. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed charts of patients with MPM treated with vinorelbine and/or gemcitabine as second- or third-line therapy between 2003 and 2010. Toxicity was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0. CT scans were reviewed with a reference radiologist according to modified RECIST criteria. RESULTS Sixty patients were identified: 33 treated with vinorelbine, 15 gemcitabine, and 12 both agents. Eighty-three percent initially received pemetrexed-platinum. Toxicity was substantial: 46% experienced at least one episode of grade 3-4 toxicity. Of 56 patients evaluable radiologically, there was 1 partial response (gemcitabine) giving a response rate of 2% (95% CI: 0-10%). Forty-six percent had stable disease. Median progression free survival was 1.7 months for vinorelbine and 1.6 months for gemcitabine. Median overall survival was 5.4 and 4.9 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Response to second- or third-line vinorelbine or gemcitabine is rare. The high rate of stable disease warrants the continued use of these agents in this setting, though the impact on survival is questionable. These data justify the choice of placebo control arms in randomized trials of novel agents in previously treated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjorie G Zauderer
- Department of Medicine, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, United States.
| | | | - Kaitlin Woo
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Camelia S Sima
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Michelle S Ginsberg
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Lee M Krug
- Department of Medicine, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, United States
| |
Collapse
|