A phase II study of erlotinib monotherapy in pre-treated non-small cell lung cancer without EGFR gene mutation who have never/light smoking history: re-evaluation of EGFR gene status (NEJ006/TCOG0903)

A Systematic Review of Mesenchymal Epithelial Transition Factor (MET) and Its Impact in the Development and Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer represents the leading cause of annual cancer-related deaths worldwide, accounting for 12.9%. The available treatment options for patients who experience disease progression remain limited. Targeted therapeutic approaches are promising but further understanding of the role of genetic alterations in tumorigenesis is imperative. The MET gene has garnered great interest in this regard. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the findings from multiple studies to provide a comprehensive and unbiased summary of the evidence. A systematic search was conducted in the reputable scientific databases Embase and PubMed, leading to the inclusion of twenty-two articles, following the PRISMA guidelines, elucidating the biological role of MET in lung cancer and targeted therapies. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO with registration ID: CRD42023437714. MET mutations were detected in 7.6-11.0% of cases while MET gene amplification was observed in 3.9-22.0%. Six studies showed favorable treatment outcomes utilizing MET inhibitors compared to standard treatment or placebo, with increases in PFS and OS ranging from 0.9 to 12.4 and 7.2 to 24.2 months, respectively, and one study reporting an increase in ORR by 17.3%. Furthermore, patients with a higher mutational burden may derive greater benefit from treatment with MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) than those with a lower mutational burden. Conversely, two studies reported no beneficial effect from adjunctive treatment with a MET targeted therapy. Given these findings, there is an urgent need to identify effective therapeutic strategies specifically targeting the MET gene in lung cancer patients.

MicroRNA-16 Restores Sensitivity to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Outperforms MEK Inhibitors in KRAS-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Chemotherapy, the treatment of choice in non-operable cases, achieves a dismal success rate, raising the need for new therapeutic options. In about 25% of NSCLC, the activating mutations of the KRAS oncogene define a subclass that cannot benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The tumor suppressor miR-16 is downregulated in many human cancers, including NSCLC. The main objectives of this study were to evaluate miR-16 treatment to restore the TKI sensitivity and compare its efficacy to MEK inhibitors in KRAS-mutated NSCLC.

METHODS

We performed in vitro and in vivo studies to investigate whether miR-16 could be exploited to overcome TKI resistance in KRAS-mutated NSCLC. We had three goals: first, to identify the KRAS downstream effectors targeted by mir-16, second, to study the effects of miR-16 restoration on TKI resistance in KRAS-mutated NSCLC both in vitro and in vivo, and finally, to compare miR-16 and the MEK inhibitor selumetinib in reducing KRAS-mutated NSCLC growth in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that miR-16 directly targets the three KRAS downstream effectors MAPK3, MAP2K1, and CRAF in NSCLC, restoring the sensitivity to erlotinib in KRAS-mutated NSCLC both in vitro and in vivo. We also provided evidence that the miR-16-erlotinib regimen is more effective than the selumetinib-erlotinib combination in KRAS-mutated NSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the biological preclinical rationale for using miR-16 in combination with erlotinib in the treatment of NSCLC with KRAS-activating mutations.

Eye, hepatobiliary, and renal disorders of erlotinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Background

Erlotinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors used to treat EGFR mutation positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Skin rash and diarrhea are well-known and common adverse events in patients receiving erlotinib, whereas other adverse events, including eye, liver, or renal disorders have not been evaluated adequately. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the ocular, hepatobiliary, and renal toxicities of erlotinib in patients with NSCLC cancers.

Methods

In total, sixty studies were assessed, and the results of the included studies were quantitatively integrated using meta-analysis. The incidence of ocular, hepatobiliary (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and bilirubin elevations; other hepatic adverse events), and renal adverse events were estimated. Additionally, the erlotinib-treated groups and the control groups (placebo or other treatment) were compared with respect to ocular disorders and ALT elevation. The study protocol has been registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42018093758.

Results

The overall incidence of ocular disorders was 3.30% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.20%–5.00%). The incidence of ALT elevation, bilirubin elevation, and other hepatobiliary disorders was 6.40% (95% CI 3.90%–10.4%), 3.80% (95% CI 2.30%–6.10%), and 1.00% (95% 0.60%–1.80%), respectively. The incidence of renal disorder was 3.10% (95% CI 1.90%–5.00%). The risk of ocular toxicity in the erlotinib treatment group was significantly increased (risk ratio = 2.91; 95% CI 1.70–4.98) compared to that in the control group. ALT elevation was not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusion

Based on the results, careful monitoring of ocular toxicity in patients receiving erlotinib should be recommended and closer monitoring of hepatic toxicity should be also recommended in patients with liver-related risk factors.

Potential insights from population kinetic assessment of progression-free survival curves

Progression-free survival (PFS) curves follow first order kinetics on exponential decay nonlinear regression analysis (EDNLRA). Some exhibit 1-phase-decay, some have 2-phase-decay, some are convex. We digitized, performed EDNLRA and generated log-linear plots for 887 published PFS curves for incurable solid tumors treated with various systemic therapies. Proportion of curves fitting 2-phase-decay varied by therapy (p < 0.0001). For 13 therapies, >64 % of PFS curves had 2-phase-decay. This included epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in unselected lung cancer patients (some with, some without mutations), immune checkpoint inhibitors, interferon, breast cancer hormonal therapies, and selected others, suggesting 2 distinct, potentially identifiable subpopulations with differing progression rates. For 22 other therapies, <25 % of PFS curves had 2-phase-decay. Only 1 therapy was in the mid-range. Small cell lung and colon carcinomas were particularly likely to yield highly convex curves (p < 0.006), probably from discontinuation of effective therapies. PFS curve shape may yield biological and clinical insights.

Phase I/II study of intermitted erlotinib in combination with docetaxel in patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (WJOG4708L)

Background

Preclinical data suggest sequential administration of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) following chemotherapy may improve efficacy. We hypothesized that intermittent delivery of EGFR-TKI following chemotherapy may increase efficacy.

Methods

This was a multicenter, single-arm phase I/II study to evaluate the efficacy of intermitted erlotinib in combination with docetaxel in patients with EGFR-negative NSCLC who failed one prior chemotherapy. The phase I primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of erlotinib. Erlotinib was administered orally once per day on days 2–16 in combination with 60 mg/m2 docetaxel on day1 for 21 days. A standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design was employed for erlotinib from 100 to 150 mg/dose. The phase II primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The ORR and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a binomial distribution. This study required 45 patients.

Results

In the phase I part, the planned dose escalation was completed without reaching MTD. The RD of erlotinib was determined as 150 mg/dose. In the phase II part, the ORR and disease control rate were 17.1% (95%CI: 7.2–32.1%) and 53.7% (95%CI: 37.4–69.3%), respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.5 (95%CI: 3.1–4.5) and 11.3 (95%CI: 8.6–16.6) months, respectively. The common non-hematological adverse event was febrile neutropenia (grade 3–4:19.6%). Two treatment-related deaths were occurred because of interstitial lung disease and pleural infection.

Conclusions

Intermittent dosing of erlotinib plus docetaxel is clinically feasible in phase I part but did not significantly improve ORR in phase II part.

Pneumonitis in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor: Meta-analysis of 153 cohorts with 15,713 patients: Meta-analysis of incidence and risk factors of EGFR-TKI pneumonitis in NSCLC

PURPOSE

Pneumonitis is a significant toxicity of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We studied the incidence of pneumonitis in clinical trials of EGFR-TKI published in 2003-2017, and performed subgroups analyses to identity predisposing factors.

METHODS

Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE search up to 4/17/17 using the keywords, "erlotinib", "gefitinib", "afatinib", "osimertinib", and "lung cancer", resulted in a total of 153 eligible trial cohorts with 15,713 advanced NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKI. The pooled incidence of all-grade, high-grade, and grade 5 pneumonitis was obtained. Subgroup analyses were performed with meta-regression using study-level covariates.

RESULTS

Among the patients without prior exposure to EGFR-TKI, the overall incidence was 1.12% (95% CI:0.79-1.58%) for all-grade, 0.61% (95% CI:0.40-0.93%) for high-grade, and 0.20% (95% CI:0.11-0.38%) for grade 5 pneumonitis. The incidence was significantly higher in Japanese studies compared to studies of non-Japan origin, for all-grade (4.77% vs. 0.55%, p < 0.001), high grade (2.49% vs. 0.37%, p < 0.001), and grade 5 pneumonitis (1.00% vs. 0.18%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated higher odds of pneumonitis in Japanese studies for all-grade (odds ratio [OR]: 5.04; 95% CI:3.14-8.11, p < 0.001), high-grade (OR: 4.45; 95% CI:2.50-7.93, p < 0.001), and grade 5 pneumonitis (OR: 4.55; 95% CI:2.20-9.44, p < 0.001) compared to others, after adjusting for types of EGFR-TKI and lines of therapy. In patients with EGFR retreatment analyzed separately, the pooled incidence was 1.13% (95% CI:0.40-3.15%) for all-grade, 0.49% (95% CI:0.21-1.11%) for high-grade, and 0.16% (95% CI:0.04-0.65%) for grade 5 pneumonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence of EGFR-TKI pneumonitis was 1.12% in patients without prior exposure to EGFR-TKI, and 1.13% in EGFR-TKI retreatment group. The cohorts from Japan had significantly higher incidence of pneumonitis, providing insights for further mechanistic studies.

Diagnostic RAS mutation analysis by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

RAS mutation analysis is an important companion diagnostic test. Treatment of colorectal cancer with anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) therapy requires demonstration of RAS mutation status (both KRAS and NRAS), and it is good practice to include BRAF. In Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma, assessment of RAS mutation status can be helpful in triaging patient samples for more extensive testing. This mini-review will discuss the role of PCR methods in providing rapid diagnostic information for cancer patients.