Trends in treatment and relative survival among Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer patients in the Netherlands (1990-2014): Disparities between younger and older patients

Racial Disparities in Cancer Guideline-Concordant Treatment Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Data for Patients With NSCLC

Introduction

Despite efforts to achieve health care equality, racial/ethnic disparities persist in lung cancer survival in the United States, with non-Hispanic Black patients experiencing higher mortality compared with non-Hispanic Whites. Previous research often focused on single treatments, overlooking the broad range of options available. We aimed to highlight disparities in survival and receipt of comprehensive lung cancer treatment by developing a guideline-concordant initial treatment (GCIT) indicator based on disease stage and recommended treatment.

Methods

Using data of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results on 377,370 patients with NSCLC, we derived a GCIT indicator based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Observed probabilities and logistic regression models adjusted for age, disease stage, and race were used to assess racial disparities in treatment and survival, with the Kaplan-Meier method evaluating survival rates. Racial/ethnic groups analyzed included non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Asian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, and American Indian/Alaska Native.

Results

Non-Hispanic Black patients had lower odds of receiving GCIT (OR = 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.82) and surviving 2 years after diagnosis (OR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.78-0.82). Non-Hispanic Asians had the highest odds of receiving GCIT (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.99-1.05). Patients receiving GCIT had improved survival, with early stage patients experiencing median survival of 67 to 102 months, compared with 11 to 17 months for those without GCIT.

Conclusion

Receiving GCIT considerably improves survival across all races, though disparities in receipt are observed. Interventions are needed to ensure equitable access to guideline-concordant care and reduce survival disparities for patients.

Describing differences among populations of thoracic tumors patients under and over 80 years: Data analysis from the SLCG thoracic tumor registry

OBJECTIVES

Cancer is a disease of old age; however, most studies usually included minority of patients fit elderly. The purpose is to investigate the clinical characteristics and genetic information of patients with thoracic tumors who are 80 years old or older compared to those under 80 years old.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The Thoracic Tumor Registry (TTR) is a Spanish observational, prospective cohort study that included patients diagnosed with thoracic tumors. Data were collected from medical records related to sociodemographic, epidemiological, clinical, molecular/genetic, and treatment outcome variables.

RESULTS

The total number of patients, recruited from August 2016 to April 2023, was 26.193 (93,1 % were younger than 80 years and 6,9 % were 80 years or older). In the group of older patients: the male ratio increased (72,9 % vs. 80 %); the number of elderly people who had never smoked or were ex-smokers increased (9,9 % vs. 21,1 % and 44,8 % vs. 61,3 %, respectively) and the number of current smokers decreased (43,3 % vs. 17,5 %); had higher ECOG performance status at diagnosis (for ECOG ≥ 2, 15 % vs. 32,9 %), and there were more patients with previous cancer (17,3 % vs. 28 %). The proportion of men is higher than that of women (73 % vs. 27 % in <80 years and 80 % vs. 20 % in ≥80 years). For all biomarkers, the proportion of patients who had a molecular determination was lower in older patients. There were no differences in terms of alterations in the biomarkers tested; except for EGFR, for which the positivity rate was higher in patients aged 80 years and older (25 % vs. 15,3 %).

CONCLUSION

The proportion of older patients with targeted mutations is higher. So, at least at diagnosis, it should be proceeded in a standard way. Then, when it comes to treatment, comorbidities and patient's baseline situation should be considered.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02941458.

Utilisation of radiotherapy in lung cancer: A scoping narrative literature review with a focus on the introduction of evidence-based therapeutic approaches in Europe

Background and purpose

The aim of this study was to review the published studies on the utilisation of radiotherapy in lung cancer (both small and non-small cell lung cancer, SCLC and NSCLC) patients in European countries with a population-based perspective.

Material and methods

A literature search since January 2000 until December 2022 was carried out. Only English-published papers were included, and only European data was considered. PRISMA guidelines were followed. A scoping narrative review was undertaken due to the hetereogeneity of the published papers.

Results

38 papers were included in the analysis, with the majority from the Netherlands (52.6%) and the UK (18.4%). Large variability is observed in the reported radiotherapy utilisation, around 40% for NSCLC in general and between 26 and 42% in stage I NSCLC. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) shows a wide range of utilisation across countries and over time, from 8 to 63%. Similary, in stage III lung cancer, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) utilisation varied considerably (11-70%). Eleven studies compared radiotherapy utilisation between older and younger age-groups, showing that younger patients receive more CRT, while the opposite applies for SBRT. An widespreadlack of data on relevant covariates such as comorbidty and health-services related variables is observed.

Conclusion

The actual utilisation of radiotherapy for lung cancer reported in patterns-of-care studies (POCs) is notably lower than the evidence-based optimal utilisation. Important variability is observed by country, time period, stage at diagnosis and age. A wider use of POCs should be promoted to improve our knowledge on the actual application of evidence-based treatment recommendations.

Survival and quality-of-life outcomes in early-stage NSCLC patients: a literature review of real-world evidence

Aim

Assess the long-term survival and quality-of-life outcomes in early-stage NSCLC (eNSCLC) patients.

Methods

Review of long-term survival and quality-of-life after curative treatment in eNSCLC patients in observational studies.

Results

Disease-free proportion decreased in stage III vs stage I patients. Recurrence-free proportion decreased with age and disease stage. Advanced stage and vascular invasion increased risk of late recurrence. Conditional 5-year relative survival rates did not exceed 87%, indicating higher mortality in eNSCLC survivors. Lower conditional survival rates and relative survival rates were associated with older age and advanced disease. Survivors of eNSCLC had poorer physical quality-of-life.

Conclusion

Despite curative-intent therapy, survivors of eNSCLC still face significant risks of recurrence, excess mortality, and diminished quality-of-life.

Best first-line therapy for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status

BACKGROUND

Most people who are newly diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have advanced disease. For these people, survival is determined by various patient- and tumor-related factors, of which the performance status (PS) is the most important prognostic factor. People with PS 0 or 1 are usually treated with systemic therapies, whereas people with PS 3 or 4 most often receive supportive care. However, treatment for people with PS 2 without a targetable mutation remains unclear. Historically, people with a PS 2 cancer are frequently excluded from (important) clinical trials because of poorer outcomes and increased toxicity. We aim to address this knowledge gap, as this group of people represents a significant proportion (20% to 30%) of the total population with newly diagnosed lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the best first-line therapy for advanced lung cancer in people with performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 17 June 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different chemotherapy (with or without angiogenesis inhibitor) or immunotherapy regimens, specifically designed for people with PS 2 only or studies including a subgroup of these people.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. overall survival (OS), 2. health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and 3. toxicity/adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were 4. tumor response rate, 5. progression-free survival, and 6. survival rates at six and 12 months' treatment. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 22 trials in this review and identified one ongoing trial. Twenty studies compared chemotherapy with different regimens, of which 11 compared non-platinum therapy (monotherapy or doublet) versus platinum doublet. We found no studies comparing best supportive care with chemotherapy and only two abstracts analyzing chemotherapy versus immunotherapy. We found that platinum doublet therapy showed superior OS compared to non-platinum therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 0.78; 7 trials, 697 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no differences in six-month survival rates (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.41; 6 trials, 632 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), whereas 12-month survival rates were improved for treatment with platinum doublet therapy (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97; 11 trials, 1567 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). PFS and tumor response rate were also better for people treated with platinum doublet therapy, with moderate-certainty evidence (PFS: HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.77; 5 trials, 487 participants; tumor response rate: RR 2.25, 95% CI 1.67 to 3.05; 9 trials, 964 participants). When analyzing toxicity rates, we found that platinum doublet therapy increased grade 3 to 5 hematologic toxicities, all with low-certainty evidence (anemia: RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.00 to 3.92; neutropenia: RR 2.75, 95% CI 1.30 to 5.82; thrombocytopenia: RR 3.96, 95% CI 1.73 to 9.06; all 8 trials, 935 participants). Only four trials reported HRQoL data; however, the methodology was different per trial and we were unable to perform a meta-analysis. Although evidence is limited, there were no differences in 12-month survival rates or tumor response rates between carboplatin and cisplatin regimens. With an indirect comparison, carboplatin seemed to have better 12-month survival rates than cisplatin compared to non-platinum therapy. The assessment of the efficacy of immunotherapy in people with PS 2 was limited. There might be a place for single-agent immunotherapy, but the data provided by the included studies did not encourage the use of double-agent immunotherapy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review showed that as a first-line treatment for people with PS 2 with advanced NSCLC, platinum doublet therapy seems to be preferred over non-platinum therapy, with a higher response rate, PFS, and OS. Although the risk for grade 3 to 5 hematologic toxicity is higher, these events are often relatively mild and easy to treat. Since trials using checkpoint inhibitors in people with PS 2 are scarce, we identified an important knowledge gap regarding their role in people with advanced NSCLC and PS 2.

Changes in survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer in Japan: An interrupted time series study

The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) gefitinib and erlotinib were approved for metastatic or relapsed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan in 2002 and 2007, respectively. EGFR mutation testing was also approved in 2007. Although clinical trials showed efficacy in NSCLC patients harboring activating EGFR mutations, these effects have rarely been reported in real-world practice. We evaluated changes in survival in NSCLC patients following introduction of these agents and EGFR mutation testing by extracting patients diagnosed with NSCLC from 1993 through 2011 from six prefectural population-based cancer registries in Japan. Relative survival (RS) was calculated by sex, histological subtype, and cancer stage. We conducted interrupted time series analysis to assess survival changes following introduction of EGFR-TKIs and EGFR mutation testing. 120,068 patients with NSCLC were analyzed. One- and three-year RS gradually increased in overall NSCLC for men and women. For adenocarcinoma, among men, slopes of 1- and 3-year RS increased steeply in patients diagnosed from 2007 through 2011; among women, significant level increases were seen in 1-year RS in patients diagnosed in 2002 (4.55% [95% confidence interval: 1.76-7.33]) and 2007 (3.40% [1.27-5.52]). These significant level increases were particularly obvious in women with adenocarcinoma at an advanced stage. Our results suggest that recent improvements in survival in men and women with adenocarcinoma are due at least partly to introduction of EGFR-TKIs into real-world practice, and to prescription based on appropriate patient selection following introduction of EGFR mutation testing into real-world practice in Japan.

Association of Pretreatment Physical and Geriatric Parameters with Treatment Tolerance and Survival in Elderly Patients with Stage I-II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Evaluation of Usual Care Data

In this study, the association of pretreatment physical and geriatric parameters with treatment tolerance and survival in elderly patients with stage I−II NSCLC was evaluated. Retrospective data for patients aged ≥70 years, diagnosed between 2016 and 2020 with stage I−II NSCLC, and who underwent surgery or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in a large Dutch teaching hospital were retrieved from medical records. Associations of pretreatment physical and geriatric parameters with treatment tolerance and survival were analyzed. Of 160 patients, 49 of 104 (47%) patients who underwent surgery and 21 of 56 (38%) patients who received SABR did not tolerate treatment. In univariable analysis, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status ≥ 2, short nutritional assessment questionnaire score > 1, short physical performance battery score ≤ 9, and geriatric-8 score ≤ 14 were significantly associated with postoperative complications. Forced expiratory volume of one second < 80% of predicted was significantly associated with intolerance of SABR. In multivariable analysis, WHO performance status ≥ 2 and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide < 80% were significantly associated with decreased overall survival. This is the first study that investigated the association between pretreatment physical and geriatric parameters and treatment outcomes in patients with stage I−II NSCLC. Evaluation of physical and geriatric parameters before treatment initiation seems highly recommended to select patients who might benefit from preventive interventions before and/or during treatment.

[Representativeness of the Spanish Thoracic Tumour Registry. Comparison of sociodemographic data with other national registries]

OBJECTIVE

In Spain, due to the lack of data at national level a lung cancer registry, the Thoracic Tumour Registry (TTR), was created. Such registry should demonstrate comparability with population-based data to ensure representativeness at population level. The aim is to compare the socio-demographic characteristics of the TTR with incidence data from the Red de Registros de Cáncer (REDECAN) and mortality data from the Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE).

METHOD

Lung cancer data sources available to date, REDECAN and INE, were used. Lung cancer cases overall and disaggregated by sex and age groups were collected from each source of information and data were compared for the period 2017-2020. Sex and age group proportions of TTR were calculated for both databases (which collect incidence and mortality data), for the entire study period and broken down by year.

RESULTS

A total of 17,109 incident lung cancer cases from the TTR, 58,668 estimated incident cases from REDECAN and 88,083 deaths registered from INE between 2017 and 2020 were included. In terms of sex, the proportions are very similar between the three sources and the differences do not exceed 4%. In terms of age, the differences are not large, being larger for mortality data in the older age group from the INE versus the TTR.

CONCLUSIONS

The TTR seems to be representative of lung cancer cases diagnosed in Spain between 2019 and 2020, both by sex and age. This allows us to accurately characterise the status of this disease, which is the leading cause of cancer death in Spain, and that the analysis of results obtained from the RTT can be applied to cases of lung cancer diagnosed in our country.

Trends in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in Finland 2014-2019

INTRODUCTION

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality in the Western world. However, emerging treatment options and more patients directed to active treatments might improve the outcomes. Here, we retrospectively studied the patient characteristics and treatment practices for NSCLC in Finland 2014-2019 with a special focus on changes in trends over time.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The cohort consisted of patients diagnosed with NSCLC in Finland 2014-2018. Cancer treatments for the patients were followed until the end of 2019. The data, both structured and unstructured, were collected from electronic medical records of four university hospitals in Finland.

RESULTS

Of the study population (n = 4047), 65% had adenocarcinoma and 29% squamous cell carcinoma. The share of patients who had not received any active treatment (except palliative radiotherapy) decreased from 32% to 18% between 2014-18. The percentage of patients receiving surgery increased slightly from 22.7% to 24% and for patients receiving chemotherapy or immuno-oncological (IO) treatments from 29% to 41.2% and from 0.8% to 8%, respectively between, 2014-18. However, the time of treatment for patients receiving systemic cancer treatments did not change during the same time period.

DISCUSSION

The current study suggests a trend in NSCLC towards more active treatment approaches in 2014-18.

Deciphering the clinical features of heterogeneous stage III non-small cell lung cancer in Japanese real-world clinical practice: Expanded cohort of the SOLUTION study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the actual treatment patterns with respective outcomes and the patient characteristics of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients (aged ≥20 years at diagnosis) who were diagnosed with stage III NSCLC between January 2013 and December 2014 and underwent surgery, chemoradiotherapy (CRT), chemotherapy (CT), or radiotherapy (RT) at 11 institutions in Japan were consecutively registered in this retrospective, observational study (SOLUTION; UMIN000031385). Study measures included patient characteristics, first-line treatments, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, objective response rate, and incidence of radiation-related adverse events.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 744 patients. The tumors were classified as stage IIIA and IIIB in 58.9% and 41.1% of patients, respectively. The tumors were considered resectable at diagnosis in 25.0% of patients. First-line treatments were surgery (20.0%), CRT (46.1%), CT (22.2%), and RT (11.7%). The median OS (mOS) in the overall population was 25.4 months and the 3-year OS rate was 38.7%. Among the four first-line treatment cohorts, OS most favored the surgery cohort: mOS was 43.4 months and the 3-year OS rate was 53.8%. Prognostic factors for OS in each treatment modality were analyzed using multivariable analysis and included the following: age, performance status, and histological type for the surgery cohort; sex, histological type, and primary lesion location (lower lobe) for the CRT cohort; and performance status and clinical stage for the RT cohort. The timing of peak incidence of pneumonitis from the start of first-line treatment was 18-20 and 12-14 weeks in the CRT and RT cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with clinical stage III NSCLC received a variety of treatments selected to the clinical background and tumor status, and we clarified the outcome and prognostic factors. These findings will be a useful reference for future studies evaluating newly introduced treatments for stage III NSCLC.

Are older patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving optimal care? A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Results from studies addressing age-related patterns of cancer care have found evidence of unjustified differences in management between younger and older patients.

METHODS

We examined associations between age and clinical presentation, management and mortality in patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between 2002 and 2016. Analyses were adjusted for comorbidity and other factors that may have affected management decisions and outcomes.

RESULTS

The study population encompassed 40,026 patients with NSCLC. Stage at diagnosis did not differ between age groups ≤ 84. The diagnostic intensity was similar in age groups <80 years. In patients with stage IA-IIB disease and PS 0-2, surgery was more common in the youngest age groups and decreased with increasing age, and was rarely performed in those ≥ 85 years. The use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) increased with age (≤69 years 5.4%; ≥85 years 35.8%). In patients with stage IIIA disease and PS 0-2, concurrent chemoradiotherapy was more common in younger patients (≤69 years 55.3%; ≥85 years 2.2%). In stage IA-IIIA disease, no major differences in treatment-related mortality was observed. In stage IIIB-IV and PS 0-2, chemotherapy was more common in patients <80 years. However, 58.1% of patients 80-84 years and 30.3% ≥ 85 years received treatment. In stage IA-IIIA, overall and cause-specific survival decreased with increasing age. No age-differences in survival were observed in patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC.

CONCLUSION

Treatments were readily given to older patients with metastatic disease, but to a lesser degree to those with early stage disease. Significant differences in cause specific survival were observed in early, but not late stage disease. Our findings underscore the importance of individualized assessment of health status and life expectancy. Our results indicate that older patients with early stage lung cancer to a higher extent should be considered for curative treatment.

Demographic and Clinical Outcomes of Brazilian Patients With Stage III or IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Evidence Study on the Basis of Deterministic Linkage Approach

Non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer and accounts for 80%-90% of the cases. In Brazil, between 2018 and 2019, lung cancer was ranked as the second most frequent cancer among men and the fourth among women. The primary objectives were to describe the journey and survival rates of patients with advanced NSCLC treated in the Brazilian private health care system (HCS).

Trends and variations in treatment of stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer from 2008 to 2018: A nationwide population-based study from the Netherlands

INTRODUCTION

This Dutch population-based study describes nationwide treatment patterns and its variations for stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with clinical stage I-III NSCLC in the period 2008-2018 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Treatment trends were studied over time and age groups. Use of radiotherapy versus surgery (stage I-II), and concurrent versus sequential chemoradiotherapy (stage III) were analyzed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

In stage I, the rate of surgery decreased from 58 % (2008) to 40 % (2018) while radiotherapy use increased over time (from 31 % to 52 %), which mostly concerned stereotactic body radiotherapy (74 %). In stage II, 54 % of patients received surgery, and use of radiotherapy alone increased from 18 % to 25 %. The strongest factors favoring radiotherapy over surgery were WHO performance status (OR ≥ 2 vs 0: 23.39 (95% CI: 18.93-28.90)), increasing age (OR ≥ 80 vs <60 years: 14.52 (95% CI: 13.02-16.18)) and stage (OR stage II vs I: 0.61 (95% CI: 0.57-0.65)). In stage III, the combined use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy increased from 35 % (2008) to 39 % (2018). In all years, 23 % received concurrent chemoradiotherapy, 9 % sequential chemoradiotherapy, 23 % radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone, and 25 % best supportive care. The strongest factors favoring concurrent over sequential chemoradiotherapy were age (OR ≥ 80 vs <60 years: 0.14 (95% CI: 0.10-0.19)), WHO Performance status (OR ≥ 2 vs 0: 0.33 (95% CI: 0.24-0.47)) and region (OR east vs north: 0.39 (95% CI: 0.30-0.50)).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of radiotherapy became more prominent over time in stage I NSCLC. Combined use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy marginally increased in stage III: only one third of patients received chemoradiotherapy, mainly concurrently. Treatment variation seen between patient groups suggests tailored treatment decision, while variation between hospitals and regions indicate differences in clinical practice.

Associations of Pretreatment Physical Status Parameters with Tolerance of Concurrent Chemoradiation and Survival in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate associations between pretreatment physical status parameters and tolerance of concurrent chemoradiation (cCHRT) and survival among patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients with stage III NSCLC who had received cCHRT between 2006 and 2015. Multivariate independent associations were analysed between the pretreatment parameters age, Charlson comorbidity index, World Health Organization performance status (WHO performance status), body mass index (BMI), fat-free mass index (FFMI), maximal handgrip strength, forced expiratory volume in one second and carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity on the one hand with tolerance of cCHRT (defined as a received radiation dose at least equal to the prescribed radiation dose) and survival on the other hand.

RESULTS

527 of 577 patients (91.3%) tolerated cCHRT. A WHO performance status ≥ 2 (odds ratio (OR) 0.43) and BMI < 18.5 kg/m² (OR 0.36) were associated with poorer tolerance of cCHRT. In the total group, a WHO performance status ≥ 2 (hazard ratio (HR) 1.73), low FFMI (HR 1.23) and intolerance of cCHRT (HR 1.55) were associated with poorer survival.

CONCLUSION

In patients with stage III NSCLC receiving cCHRT, poor WHO performance status and BMI < 18.5 kg/m² were independently associated with tolerance of cCHRT. Physical status parameters and intolerance of cCHRT were independently associated with poorer survival. Besides using this information for treatment decisions, optimizing physical status in patients at risk for intolerance of cCHRT might be a next step for improving treatment outcomes.

Patterns of age disparities in colon and lung cancer survival: a systematic narrative literature review

OBJECTIVES

To identify patterns of age disparities in cancer survival, using colon and lung cancer as exemplars.

DESIGN

Systematic review of the literature.

DATA SOURCES

We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science through 18 December 2020.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We retained all original articles published in English including patients with colon or lung cancer. Eligible studies were required to be population-based, report survival across several age groups (of which at least one was over the age of 65) and at least one other characteristic (eg, sex, treatment).

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies against selected evaluation domains from the QUIPS tool, and items concerning statistical reporting. We evaluated age disparities using the absolute difference in survival or mortality rates between the middle-aged group and the oldest age group, or by describing survival curves.

RESULTS

Out of 3047 references, we retained 59 studies (20 for colon, 34 for lung and 5 for both sites). Regardless of the cancer site, the included studies were highly heterogeneous and often of poor quality. The magnitude of age disparities in survival varied greatly by sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, stage at diagnosis, cancer site, and morphology, the number of nodes examined and treatment strategy. Although results were inconsistent for most characteristics, we consistently observed greater age disparities for women with lung cancer compared with men. Also, age disparities increased with more advanced stages for colon cancer and decreased with more advanced stages for lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Although age is one of the most important prognostic factors in cancer survival, age disparities in colon and lung cancer survival have so far been understudied in population-based research. Further studies are needed to better understand age disparities in colon and lung cancer survival.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020151402.

'Care for Outcomes': systematic development of a set of outcome indicators to improve patient-relevant outcomes for patients with lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Measuring quality of care is important, however many of the quality indicators used do not focus on outcome of treatment and aspects which are valuable for patients and physicians. The project 'Care for Outcomes' aims to establish a relevant set of outcome indicators for lung cancer.

SETTING

Network of seven large, non-university teaching hospitals in the Netherlands (Santeon).

METHODS

By reviewing the literature, a list of potential outcome indicators for patients with lung cancer was composed and subsequently prioritised by expert's opinion. Three external parties, with expertise on lung cancer, clinical management and public health, evaluated and reduced the list of indicators to a working set. Finally, the resulting selection of outcome indicators was tested for feasibility and discrimination in patient data, by collecting retrospective data and performing regression and survival analyses.

PARTICIPANTS

Development of the indicator set in six Santeon hospitals. Retrospective cohort study in 5922 patients diagnosed with lung cancer (all types and stages).

RESULTS

Selected outcome indicators were divided into three levels of outcome (tiers). The first tier about survival and the process of recovery include mortality, survival, positive resection margins, rethoracotomy after resection and quality of life at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months. Tier 2 concerning the sustainability of the recovery include complications after resection and toxicity after chemotherapy and/or radiation. Tier 3 about sustainability of health revealed no measurable outcomes. The retrospective data collection showed differences between hospitals and variation in case mix.

CONCLUSION

A relevant set of outcome indicators for lung cancer was systematically developed. This set has the potential to compare quality of care between hospitals and inform patients with lung cancer about outcomes. The project is ongoing in the current Santeon Value-Based Health Care programme through quality and improvement cycles.

Estimated direct costs of non-small cell lung cancer by stage at diagnosis and disease management phase: A whole-disease model

Background

Non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the first cause of cancer‐related death among men and the second among women worldwide. It also poses an economic threat to the sustainability of healthcare services. This study estimated the direct costs of care for patients with NSCLC by stage at diagnosis, and management phase of pathway recommended in local and international guidelines.

Methods

Based on the most up‐to‐date guidelines, we developed a very detailed “whole‐disease” model listing the probabilities of all potentially necessary diagnostic and therapeutic actions involved in the management of each stage of NSCLC. We assigned a cost to each procedure, and obtained an estimate of the total and average per‐patient costs of each stage of the disease and phase of its management.

Results

The mean expected cost of a patient with NSCLC is 21,328 € (95% C.I. −20 897−22 322). This cost is 16 291 € in stage I, 19530 € in stage II, 21938 € in stage III, 22175 € in stage IV, and 28 711 € for a Pancoast tumor. In the early stages of the disease, the main cost is incurred by surgery, whereas in the more advanced stages radiotherapy, medical therapy, treatment for progressions, and supportive care become variously more important.

Conclusions

An estimation of the direct costs of care for NSCLC is fundamental in order to predict the burden of new oncological therapies and treatments on healthcare services, and thus orient the decisions of policy‐makers regarding the allocation of resources.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

The high costs of surgery make the early stages of the disease no less expensive than the advanced stages.

What this study adds

An estimation of the direct costs of care is fundamental in order to orient the decisions of policy‐makers regarding the allocation of resources.

Patterns of survival and surgical treatment in lung cancer patients in Estonia by histologic type and stage, 1996-2016

Background: Lung cancer (LC) remains the most frequent cause of cancer death worldwide. We aimed to examine long-term trends in LC survival in Estonia by age, gender, histologic type and stage, with specific focus on surgical treatment.Material and methods: Data on all incident cases of LC diagnosed from 1996 to 2016 were obtained from the Estonian Cancer Registry. Logistic regression was used to examine receipt of surgical treatment in localized LC. Relative survival ratios (RSR) were calculated, and excess hazard ratios (EHR) of death were estimated by stage with gender, age, histology and period of diagnosis as independent variables.Results: Among the total of 16,423 cases, squamous cell carcinoma remained the most common histologic type. The odds of receiving surgical treatment in localized LC increased significantly over time and were associated with age, gender and histologic type. Overall, the age-standardized 5-year RSR improved significantly from 10% in 1996-2002 to 16% in 2010-2016 (from 8% to 15% in men and from 15% to 20% in women). Larger survival gain was seen in younger patients, for non-small cell LC subtypes, and for surgically treated patients. For localized disease, the 5-year RSR increased by more than 20 percentage units, reaching 50% in men and 69% in women. For all stages, the adjusted EHR of death was significantly associated with age, histologic type and period of diagnosis.Conclusions: We observed a substantial improvement of relative survival, with considerable variations across patient groups. After adjustment for age, gender and histology, a significant survival increase over time was seen for all stages. The considerable survival gain observed for localized LC can largely be attributed to rapidly growing proportion of surgically treated patients. Further investigation of LC management practices, particularly the use of non-surgical treatment options is warranted.

Understanding survivors' needs and outcomes: the role of routinely collected data

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The number of cancer survivors is growing due to population ageing, earlier detection and more effective therapies. Routinely collected data (RCD), generally cancer registry data, has been used to investigate survivors' needs and outcomes. We reviewed uses of RCD since 2017, identifying novel findings and research directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Survival is improving internationally but continues to vary between subgroups. Longitudinal survivor surveys suggest malignancy-specific temporal patterns in unmet needs and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). Unmet needs are a risk factor for future depression and depression predicts poorer HRQoL in all domains. Emerging evidence suggests links between posttraumatic stress and poor HRQoL and posttraumatic growth and improved HRQoL. Evidence for a link between cancer-related financial hardship and poor HRQoL is accumulating. Surveys and linkage studies continue to show poorer work outcomes in survivors. Among survivors of childhood and young adult cancers, large linkage studies demonstrate significant risk of late effects, including hospitalization, pregnancy and labour complications, and cardiac death.

SUMMARY

RCD plays a significant role in understanding survivors' needs and outcomes. New approaches which overlay different types of data - including detailed clinical and treatment data, biomarker data and nonhealth administrative data - have the potential to generate considerable new knowledge.

Variation in the time to treatment for stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer patients for hospitals in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVES

Increased emphasis on molecular diagnostics can lead to increased variation in time to treatment (TTT) for patients with stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer. This article presents the variation in TTT for advanced NSCLC patients observed in Dutch hospitals before the widespread use of immunotherapy. The aim of this article was to explore the variation in TTT between patients, as well as between hospitals.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Based on the Netherlands Cancer Registry, we used patient-level data (n = 4096) from all 78 hospitals that diagnosed stage III or IV NSCLC in the Netherlands in 2016. To investigate how patient characteristics and hospital-level effects are associated with TTT (from diagnosis until start treatment), we interpreted regression model results for five common patient profiles to analyze the influence of age, gender, tumor stage, performance status, histology, and referral status as well as hospital-level characteristics on the TTT.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

TTT varies substantially between and within hospitals. The median TTT was 28 days with an inter-quartile range of 22 days. The hospital-level median TTT ranges from 17 to 68 days. TTT correlates significantly with tumor stage, performance status, and histology. The hospital-level effect, unrelated to hospital volume and type, affected TTT by several weeks at most. For most patients, TTT is within range as recommended in current guidelines. Variation in TTT seems higher for patients receiving either radiotherapy or targeted therapy, or for patients referred to another hospital and we hypothesize this is related to the complexity of the diagnostic pathway. With further advances in molecular diagnostics and precision oncology we expect variation in TTT to increase and this needs to be considered in designing optimal cancer care delivery.

Delineating the pattern of treatment for elderly locally advanced NSCLC and predicting outcomes by a validated model: A SEER based analysis

INTRODUCTION

Locally advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) represented a highly heterogeneous group, with more than half of the patients aged ≥65 years at the time of diagnosis. However, the optimal treatment for elderly LA-NSCLC patients was still not defined.

METHODS

A total of 33530 elderly patients (≥65 years) diagnosed with LA-NSCLC from 2004 to 2014 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

RESULTS

Locally advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients aged 65-74 years were more frequently treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (40%), while patients aged ≥75 years received more best supportive care (BSC) (36%). For age group of 65-74 years, patients who had surgery with or without (neo)adjuvant therapy had a median survival of 28 months, CRT 15 months, radiotherapy (RT) alone 6 months, chemotherapy alone 11 months, and BSC 3 months; while for patients aged ≥ 75 years, the median OS was 20, 13, 7, 9, and 2, respectively. Besides, independent clinicopathological factors were integrated into nomograms for OS and CSS prediction, C-indexes achieved 0.692 and 0.698, respectively. Importantly, the discrimination of nomogram was superior to that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification (0.742 vs 0.572 for training set and 0.731 vs 0.565 for validation set).

CONCLUSION

For elderly patients with LA-NSCLC, the curative-intent treatment (surgery or CRT) conferred better survival compared to chemotherapy alone, RT alone and BSC. The proposed nomograms based on independent clinicopathological variables may be practical and helpful for precise evaluation of patient prognosis, and guiding the individualized treatment for elderly LA-NSCLC.

Applying Data Science methods and tools to unveil healthcare use of lung cancer patients in a teaching hospital in Spain

PURPOSE

Our primary goal was to study the use of outpatient attendances by lung cancer patients in Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (HUPHM), Spain, by leveraging our Electronic Patient Record (EPR) and structured clinical registry of lung cancer cases as well as assessing current Data Science methods and tools.

METHODS/PATIENTS

We applied the Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) to integrate and analyze activity data extracted from the EPR (9.3 million records) and clinical data of lung cancer patients from a previous registry that was curated into a new, structured database based on REDCap. We have described and quantified factors with an influence in outpatient care use from univariate and multivariate points of view (through Poisson and negative binomial regression).

RESULTS

Three cycles of CRISP-DM were performed resulting in a curated database of 522 lung cancer patients with 133 variables which generated 43,197 outpatient visits and tests, 1538 ER visits and 753 inpatient admissions. Stage and ECOG-PS at diagnosis and Charlson Comorbidity Index were major contributors to healthcare use. We also found that the patients' pattern of healthcare use (even before diagnosis), the existence of a history of cancer in first-grade relatives, smoking habits, or even age at diagnosis, could play a relevant role.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating activity data from EPR and clinical structured data from lung cancer patients and applying CRISP-DM has allowed us to describe healthcare use in connection with clinical variables that could be used to plan resources and improve quality of care.

Population-based patterns of treatment and survival for patients with stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer aged 65-74 years and 75 years or older

OBJECTIVES

Insights regarding utilization and survival of surgery and radiotherapy (stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or conventional radiotherapy (RT)) are lacking for older patients with stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in clinical practice.

METHODS

Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry were retrieved for patients ≥65 years with clinical stage I-II NSCLC in 2010-2015. Descriptive analyses, overall survival (OS), and cox regression were stratified for stage I (n = 8742) and II (n = 3439) and compared age groups (65-74 years vs ≥75 years).

RESULTS

Patients aged 65-74 underwent surgery significantly more often compared to those aged ≥75 (stage I 55% vs 27%; stage II: 65% vs 35%), and received SBRT less often (I: 29% vs 42%; II: 5% vs 11%), conventional RT less often (I: 6% vs 11%; II 10% vs 24%) and best supportive care alone less often (BSC, I: 8% vs 19%; II: 9% vs 25%). One-year OS was significantly higher in patients aged 65-74 compared to those aged ≥75 (I: 87% vs 78%; II: 74% vs 60%); as was five-year OS (I: 49% vs 31%; II: 36% vs 18%). After adjustment for gender, histology, stage, treatment, and comorbidity, hazard ratio (HR) of death was higher for patients aged ≥75 compared to those aged 65-74 (I: HR 1.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.5; II: HR 1.3 95%CI 1.1-1.7).

CONCLUSION

Patients aged ≥75 with stage I-II NSCLC had poorer OS, underwent surgery less often, and received SBRT, conventional RT, and BSC more often than patients aged 65-74. In both stages, one-year OS within age groups was similar for surgery and SBRT. However, long-term OS adjusted for prognostic factors was superior for surgery compared to SBRT and remained poorer for those aged ≥75. Prospective research should focus on predictive characteristics for treatment selection and patient-centered outcomes.

Evidence of slight improvement in five-year survival in non-small-cell lung cancer over the last 10 years: Results of the French KBP-CPHG real-world studies

BACKGROUND

Although improved during the last decades, the prognosis of lung cancer is poor. In 2000, the French College of general hospital respiratory physicians, conducted KBP-2000-CPHG, a prospective multicenter epidemiological study including all volunteer adult patients diagnosed for primary lung cancer; with the five-year survival as primary endpoint. The primary objective of KBP-2010-CPHG was to compare overall five-year survival data with KBP-2000-CPHG ones.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All consecutive patients≥18 years of age with primary lung cancer diagnosed between 1st January and 31st December 2010 were included. The KBP-2010-CPHG protocol was approved by the advisory committee on research information processing in the health field (CCTIRS) on November 19, 2009.

RESULTS

Respectively, 5667 and 7051 patients were included in KBP-2000-CPHG and KBP-2010-CPHG. Five-year survival was improved: 12.7% [11.9%-13.5%] in 2010 versus 10.0% [9.2%-10.9%] in 2000 (P<0.001). Non-small-cell lung cancer showed improvement (13.8% [13.0%-14.8%] in 2010 versus 11.4% [10.5%-12.4%] in 2000; P<0.001); but not small-cell lung cancer (5.7% [4.4%-7.4%] in 2010 versus 3.3% [2.3%-4.7%] in 2000; P=0.56). The KBP-2010-CPHG study showed an overall 6% reduction in risk of death (HR=0.94 [0.89-0.98]; P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival of patients with lung cancer improved over a 10-year period. This improvement was slight and limited to non-small-cell lung cancer, possibly partly because of 2010 advances in diagnosis and targeted therapy.

Study Protocol of the NVALT25-ELDAPT Trial: Selecting the Optimal Treatment for Older Patients With Stage III Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients aged 75 years or older with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are underrepresented in clinical trials, leading to a lack of evidence for selection of the optimal treatment strategy. Information on benefits and harms of concurrent chemoradiotherapy among medically fit elderly patients is largely unknown, and reliable tools are needed to distinguish fit from frail patients for treatment selection. Also, information regarding quality of life during and after treatment is scarce.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter NVALT25-ELDAPT (Dutch Association of Chest Physicians Trial Number 25 - Elderly with locally advanced Lung cancer: Deciding through geriatric Assessment on the oPtimal Treatment strategy) trial (NCT02284308) consists of a phase III randomized trial in combination with an observational study for all patients who do not participate in the randomized trial. The first aim of this study is to develop a reliable and clinically applicable screening tool to distinguish medically fit from frail patients. All patients ≥ 75 years diagnosed with stage III NSCLC are invited to undergo extensive geriatric assessment (part I). The second aim is to compare treatment tolerance, survival, and quality of life between concurrent and sequential chemoradiotherapy in fit patients (randomized trial, part II). For all patients, overall survival adjusted for quality of life (quality-adjusted survival) is described for each category of fitness and treatment strategy during and after treatment.

CONCLUSION

With the results of the NVALT25-ELDAPT trial, treatment selection can be optimized and the best possible outcomes for each individual older patient with stage III NSCLC can be achieved.

Identifying patterns of care for elderly patients with non-surgically treated stage III non-small cell lung cancer: an analysis of the national cancer database

Background

To compare patterns of care for elderly patients versus non-elderly patients with non-surgically treated stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We hypothesize that elderly patients are less likely to receive curative treatments, including concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT), compared to non-elderly patients.

Methods

We identified patients from the NCDB between 2003 and 2014 with non-surgically treated stage III NSCLC. We defined elderly as ≥70 years old and non-elderly <70 years old. Treatment categories included: no treatment, palliative treatment (chemotherapy alone, radiation (RT) alone <59.4 Gy or chemoradiation (CRT) <59.4 Gy), or definitive treatment (RT alone ≥59.4 Gy or CRT ≥59.4 Gy). Differences in treatment between elderly and non-elderly were tested using the χ² test.

Results

We identified 57,602 elderly and 55,928 non-elderly patients. More elderly patients received no treatment (24.5% vs. 13.2%, P < 0.0001) and the elderly were less likely to receive definitive treatment (48.5% vs. 56.3%, P < 0.0001). CCRT was delivered in a significantly smaller proportion of elderly vs. non-elderly patients (66.0% vs. 78.9%, P < 0.0001 in patients treated with definitive intent; 32.0% vs. 44.5%, P < 0.0001 in patients receiving any treatment; and 24.2% vs. 38.6%, P < 0.0001 amongst all patients).

Conclusions

In this large study of patients with non-surgically treated stage III NSCLC, elderly patients were less likely to receive any treatment or treatment with definitive intent compared to the non-elderly. The lack of use of concurrent or sequential chemotherapy in the elderly with stage III NSCLC suggests that the optimal treatment approach for this vulnerable population remains undefined.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-018-1142-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Substantial nation-wide improvement in lung cancer relative survival in Norway from 2000 to 2016

INTRODUCTION

There have been significant changes in both diagnostic procedures and therapy for lung cancer since the beginning of the millennium. National incidence and survival data from 2000 through 2016 are studied.

METHODS

National data on cancer incidence and vital status are virtually complete. Changes in incidence and survival are described by absolute numbers, percentages, and calculation of relative survival (period analysis).

RESULTS

A total of 44,825 individuals were diagnosed with lung cancer in Norway in the study period. The number of incident cases increased with 49% whereas the prevalence increased with 136% from 2000 to 2016. Age-standardised rates rose markedly for women and levelled off for men. In 2016, adenocarcinoma accounted for about 50% of all lung cancers, slightly more for women than for men. The entity "NSCLC not otherwise specified" declined from 24% to 13%, and the fraction of patients with metastatic disease decreased from 54% to 46% during the period, for both sexes combined. The overall median survival time doubled for women and men, reaching 14.3 months and 11.4 months, respectively. For patients with metastatic disease, median survival time showed a small increase but remained less than 6 months. The overall 5-year relative survival increased from 16% to 26% in women and from 16% to 22% in men. The corresponding improvements for the subgroup of non-surgically treated cases with localised disease, were up from 25% to more than 40% in females, and from 10% to almost 40% in males.

CONCLUSION

There have been notable changes in incidence patterns and a remarkable improvement in survival for lung cancer over the last 17 years, most markedly for patients without distant metastases at the time of diagnosis. Hopefully, survival will improve even more when immunotherapy is implemented.

Patterns of treatment and survival among older patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Patterns of treatment and survival are largely unknown for older patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in daily clinical practice.

METHODS

All patients ≥65 years with stage III NSCLC (2009-2013) were included from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Descriptive and multivariable treatment and survival analyses were stratified for patients aged 65-74 years and ≥75 years.

RESULTS

Compared to older patients (n = 3163), those aged 65-74 years (n = 3876) underwent more often surgery (21% vs 12% for stage IIIA), chemoradiotherapy (47% vs 22% for both stage IIIA and IIIB), and chemotherapy (23% vs 12% for stage IIIB), and received less radiotherapy (8% vs 22% for both stage IIIA and IIIB). One-year survival was significantly higher among patients aged 65-74 compared to those aged ≥75 (61% vs 43%, for stage IIIA and 45% vs 30% for stage IIIB; P < .01). However, stratification of treatment showed similar survival rates between age groups. Among patients aged 65-74 years, the multivariably adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of death was twice as high for patients receiving radiotherapy (HR 1.9 (95%CI 1.6-2.2) for stage IIIA and HR 2.5 (95%CI 2.1-3.0) for stage IIIB) and chemotherapy (HR 2.2 (95%CI 1.9-2.5) and HR 2.2 (95%CI 1.8-2.7), respectively) compared to chemoradiotherapy, and were slightly lower for patients aged ≥75 years receiving radiotherapy (HR 1.6 (95%CI 1.4-1.9) and HR 1.8 (95%CI 1.5-2.1), respectively) and chemotherapy (HR 2.2 (95%CI 1.8-2.7) and HR 1.8 (95%CI 1.5-2.2), respectively). Comorbidity was not significantly associated with poorer survival (p = .07).

CONCLUSION

Chemoradiotherapy was more often applied among patients aged 65-74 years compared to those aged ≥75. While survival was worse for patients aged ≥75 years, differences between age groups largely disappeared after stratification for treatment. Future research should focus on predictive patient characteristics to distinguish patients within the heterogeneous older population who can benefit from curative-intent treatment.

The acceptance of illness, the intensity of pain and the quality of life in patients with lung cancer

Background

Lung cancer is the major cause of cancer related deaths worldwide. The overall 5-year survival rate is very low and accounts for only 15%. Poor quality of life is considered a prognostic factor for shorter survival in lung cancer patients. The aim of the study was to examine the relationships between pain, the acceptance of illness and quality of life in patients with lung cancer.

Methods

The study included 155 patients with lung cancer with mean age of 62.23 [standard deviation (SD)=9.86] years. We used the Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-8) for the assessment of quality of life. For statistical analysis, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and linear regression method were used.

Results

Mean score of the acceptance of illness was 27.1 (SD=9.2). Mean score of the pain severity as measured by the VAS was 4.07 (SD=1.83). The acceptance of illness was significantly positively correlated with all the domains of quality of life. Both the AIS and the VAS were independent determinants of physical and mental components of quality of life. Age and World Health Organization (WHO) performance status were additional predictors of physical component of quality of life.

Conclusions

The knowledge about the acceptance of illness, consequences of the decreased acceptance of illness, and factors affecting its level in patients with lung cancer is still insufficient. Relationships among acceptance of illness, quality of life, and pain should be further investigated.