Clinical outcomes of black vs. non-black patients with locally advanced non–small cell lung cancer

Social Disparities in Lung Cancer

Social disparities in lung cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survival have been studied using national databases, statewide registries, and institution-level data. Some disparities emerge consistently, such as lower adherence to treatment guidelines and worse survival by race and socioeconomic status, whereas other disparities are less well studied. A critical appraisal of current data is essential to increasing equity in lung cancer care.

Racial Disparities in Treatment Patterns and Survival Among Surgically Treated Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Patients

Surgery may improve survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients. We examined treatment and survival in black and white surgical MPM patients using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Among patients with pleurectomy/decortication (PD) or extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), multivariable logistic regressions were used to evaluate racial differences in surgical extent, additional treatment, and 30-/90-day mortality. Multivariable and propensity matched models were used to assess differences in survival. We identified 2550 patients; 2462 white (96.5%), 88 black (3.5%). Black patients were significantly less likely to receive EPP (OR_adj 0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.78) and trended towards worse 30-/90-day mortality (OR_adj 1.54, 95% CI 0.59-4.03; OR_adj 1.59, 95% CI 0.80-3.17, respectively). There was no difference in survival (HR_adj 0.94, 95% CI 0.71-1.25). Surgery conferred a survival benefit (HR_adj 0.77, 95% CI 0.73-0.82), but it varied by race (HR_adj[white] 0.76, 95% CI 0.72-0.81; HR_adj[black] 0.93, 95% CI 0.67-1.29). With the limitation of a small proportion of surgically resected black MPM patients in this population-based analysis, black patients were noted to undergo less extensive surgery. Although there was an overall survival benefit noted with surgery, this was not consistent across races, despite trends towards worse short-term mortality in black patients.

Patterns of Care and Survival in Stage III NSCLC Among Black and Latino Patients Compared With White Patients

BACKGROUND

Race and socioeconomic status have continued to affect the survival and patterns of care of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data evaluating these associations in patients with stage III disease remain limited. Therefore, we investigated the patterns of care and overall survival (OS) of black and Latino patients with locally advanced NSCLC compared with white patients, using the National Cancer Database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with stage III NSCLC from 2004 to 2013 who had undergone external beam radiotherapy (RT) alone, RT with chemotherapy (bimodality), or RT with chemotherapy followed by surgery (trimodality) were analyzed within the National Cancer Database according to race (n = 113,945). Univariate associations among the demographic, disease, and treatment characteristics within the 3 cohorts were assessed using χ2 tests. The OS between cohorts were analyzed using the log-rank test and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

The black and Latino patients were younger at diagnosis, had lower median household incomes, and were less likely to be insured than were the white patients. The black patients were more likely to receive RT alone (19.3% vs. 18%; P < .001) and less likely to have undergone concurrent chemo-RT (53.6% vs. 56.1%; P < .001) compared with the white patients. Black patients had improved OS (P < .001). In contrast, the Latino patients had survival equivalent to that of the white patients (P = .920).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite epidemiologic differences and a propensity for less aggressive treatment, black patients with locally advanced NSCLC had better OS than white patients and Latino patients had equivalent outcomes. Additional research is needed to elucidate this finding, perhaps focusing on biological differences among the cohorts.

Recent progress in systemic treatment for lung cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We intend to highlight progress made in 2017 to lung cancer molecular nosology and application of new knowledge to treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies have shown that agents targeting specific molecular defects in lung cancers such as epidermal growth factor receptor(egfr) mutations, alk or ros1 gene rearrangements, are more effective than conventional combination chemotherapy as primary treatment for various lung cancer subgroups. Identification of mechanisms of drug resistance has guided development of improved agents and effective salvage regimens. Progress in reversing tumor-induced immunosuppression has led to further improvements in response rates (RR) including some patients with prolonged durable remissions.

SUMMARY

State-of-the-art management of patients with lung cancer requires information derived from tumor molecular analysis, obtained either directly from the tumor or from tumor-derived circulating DNA. Empiric combination chemotherapy is no longer uniformly the best available treatment for all patients. Therapeutic decisions should be guided by an understanding of molecular features of an individual patient's tumor. The future gains will likely emerge from finding optimal ways of combining targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy.