1
|
Parra-Medina R, Castañeda-González JP, Chaves-Cabezas V, Alzate JP, Chaves JJ. Diagnostic performance of immunohistochemistry markers for malignant pleural mesothelioma diagnosis and subtypes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pathol Res Pract 2024; 257:155276. [PMID: 38603842 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) poses diagnostic challenges due to its resemblance to benign pleural pathologies and different histological subtypes. Several immunohistochemistry markers have been employed to aid in accurate diagnosis. METHODS The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of various immunohistochemistry markers in malignant pleural mesothelioma diagnosis and its histological subtypes. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched the literature for articles on using different immunohistochemical markers in MPM and its histological subtypes. EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, and Virtual Health Library were searched for studies published up to August 2023. We used the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) criteria to assess the quality of the included articles. Meta-analyses were performed to determine prevalence using a random-effects model. RESULTS 103 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising a diverse range of immunohistochemistry markers. EMA and desmin-loss exhibited high sensitivity (96% and 92%, respectively) in distinguishing malignant pleural mesothelioma from benign pleural pathologies. Specificity was notably high for both BAP1-loss and survivin expression at 100%. Subtype-specific analyses demonstrated that EMA and HEG1 were sensitive markers for epithelioid mesothelioma, while GLUT1 showed high sensitivity for sarcomatoid mesothelioma. In cases comparing epithelioid mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma, CAM5.2 and calretinin displayed high sensitivity, while WT1 and BAP1-loss demonstrated exceptional specificity for malignant epithelioid mesothelioma. In the case of sarcomatoid mesothelioma and sarcomatoid lung carcinoma, GATA3 exhibited the most heightened sensitivity, while GATA3 and D2-40 displayed the best specificity for sarcomatoid malignant mesothelioma diagnosis. CONCLUSION Immunohistochemistry markers are essential in accurately diagnosing malignant pleural mesothelioma and its histological subtypes. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide a comprehensive insight into the diagnostic performance of these markers, facilitating their potential clinical utility in the discrimination of malignant pleural mesothelioma from other pleural pathologies and the differentiation of malignant pleural mesothelioma subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Parra-Medina
- Research Institute, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Bogotá, Colombia; Department of Pathology, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Bogotá, Colombia; Department of Pathology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá.
| | - Juan Pablo Castañeda-González
- Research Institute, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Bogotá, Colombia; Department of Pathology, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Bogotá, Colombia.
| | - Viviana Chaves-Cabezas
- Department of Pathology, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Bogotá, Colombia.
| | - Juan Pablo Alzate
- Research Institute, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Bogotá, Colombia.
| | - Juan José Chaves
- Department of Medicine, Norwalk Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, Norwalk, CT, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rossi G, Righi L, Barbisan F, Tiseo M, Spagnolo P, Grosso F, Pisapia P, Malapelle U, Sculco M, Dianzani I, Abate-Daga L, Davolio MC, Ceresoli GL, Galetta D, Pasello G, Novello S, Bironzo P. BAP1 Loss, Nuclear Grading, and Nonepithelioid Features in the Diagnosis of Mesothelioma in Italy: Nevermore without the Pathology Report. J Pers Med 2024; 14:394. [PMID: 38673021 PMCID: PMC11051266 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14040394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The pathologic diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma is generally based on international guidelines, but no compulsory points based on different drugs approvals in different European countries are required to be reported. According to the last (2021) edition of the World Health Organization classification of pleural tumors, the nuclear grade of epithelioid-type mesothelioma should be always inserted in the pathologic report, while the presence of BRCA-associated protein-1 (BAP1) (clone C4) loss and a statement on the presence of the sarcomatoid/nonepithelioid component are fundamental for both a screening of patients with suspected BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome and the eligibility to perform first-line immunotherapy at least in some countries. Several Italian experts on pleural mesothelioma who are deeply involved in national scientific societies or dedicated working groups supported by patient associations agreed that the pathology report of mesothelioma of the pleura should always include the nuclear grade in the epithelioid histology, which is an overt statement on the presence of sarcomatoid components (at least 1%, in agreement with the last classification of pleural mesothelioma) and the presence of BAP1 loss (BAP1-deficient mesothelioma) or not (BAP1-retained mesothelioma) in order to screen patients possibly harboring BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome. This review aims to summarize the most recent data on these three important elements to provide evidence regarding the possible precision needs for mesothelioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Rossi
- Pathology Unit, Services Area, Fondazione Poliambulanza Hospital Institute, Via Bissolati 57, 25124 Brescia, Italy;
- Fondazione FONICAP, Via Locchi, 26, 37124 Verona, Italy
| | - Luisella Righi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (L.R.); (S.N.); (P.B.)
| | - Francesca Barbisan
- Pathological Anatomy Institute, Polytechnic University of Marche Region, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
| | - Marcello Tiseo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma and Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy;
| | - Paolo Spagnolo
- Respiratory Disease Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy;
| | - Federica Grosso
- Mesothelioma Unit, AO SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, 15121 Alessandria, Italy;
| | - Pasquale Pisapia
- Department of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Umberto Malapelle
- Department of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Marika Sculco
- Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy; (M.S.); (I.D.)
| | - Irma Dianzani
- Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy; (M.S.); (I.D.)
| | - Laura Abate-Daga
- TU.TO.R. Tumori Toracici Rari, Patient Advocacy, 20123 Milan, Italy;
| | - Maria Cristina Davolio
- Legal Medicine and Risk Management Department, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Strada Martiniana, 21, 41126 Modena, Italy;
| | | | - Domenico Galetta
- Medical Thoracic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| | - Giulia Pasello
- Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy;
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Silvia Novello
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (L.R.); (S.N.); (P.B.)
| | - Paolo Bironzo
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (L.R.); (S.N.); (P.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yuce TH, Ak G, Metintas S, Dundar E, Roe OD, Panou V, Metintas M. BAP1, Wilms' tumor 1, and calretinin in predicting survival and response to first-line chemotherapy in patients with pleural mesothelioma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:38. [PMID: 38280040 PMCID: PMC10821830 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05565-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE There are currently no methods to predict response to chemotherapy in pleural mesothelioma (PM). The aim of this study is to investigate the predictive and prognostic role of BAP1, WT1 and calretinin expression and their combinations in pre-treatment tumor samples by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. METHODS The study included consecutive PM patients treated with chemotherapy alone at a University hospital between 2009 and 2020. BAP1 analyses were performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples of the patients, while WT1 and calretinin information were obtained from the histopathological diagnosis records. RESULTS Of the total 107 patients included, 64% had loss of BAP1 expression, whereas 77% had WT1 and 86% had calretinin expression. Patients with the presence of BAP1 expression, one or both of the other two markers, or loss of expression of all three markers (unfavorable status) were more likely to not respond to chemotherapy than those with the presence of all three markers or loss of BAP1 expression and expression of one or two other markers (favorable status) (p = 0.001). Median survival time of patients with favorable and unfavorable status was 15 ± 1.7 and 8.0 ± 2.4 months, respectively (p = 0.027). After adjustment for histopathology and stage, loss of BAP1 (HR = 0.54, 95%CI 0.35-0.83), WT1 (1.75, 1.06-2.90), calretinin (2.09, 1.14-3.84) expression and favourable panel (0.50, 0.27-0.92) was associated with prognosis. CONCLUSIONS The IHC biomarkers BAP1, WT1, and calretinin, used in the routine diagnosis of PM and their combinations, are the first biomarkers associated with response to chemotherapy and may be a useful tool to select patients for first-line platinum pemetrexed treatment in PM patients. Validation in a large cohort is ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuna Han Yuce
- Department of Chest Diseases, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Medical Faculty, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Guntulu Ak
- Department of Chest Diseases, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Medical Faculty, Eskisehir, Turkey
- Lung and Pleural Cancers Research and Clinical Center, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Selma Metintas
- Lung and Pleural Cancers Research and Clinical Center, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
- Department of Public Health, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Medical Faculty, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Emine Dundar
- Lung and Pleural Cancers Research and Clinical Center, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
- Department of Pathology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Medical Faculty, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Oluf Dimitri Roe
- Department of Oncology, Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Vasiliki Panou
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Odense Respiratory Research Unit (ODIN), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Muzaffer Metintas
- Department of Chest Diseases, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Medical Faculty, Eskisehir, Turkey.
- Lung and Pleural Cancers Research and Clinical Center, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schulte JJ, Husain AN. Updates on grading mesothelioma. Histopathology 2024; 84:153-162. [PMID: 37872123 DOI: 10.1111/his.15065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Mesothelioma is a rare disease with an historically poor prognosis. Over the past decade, a grading system has been developed that is a powerful prognostic tool in epithelioid mesothelioma. Grading of epithelioid mesothelioma is now required or strongly recommended by expert consensus, the College of American Pathologists, the World Health Organization, and the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. The original nuclear grading system for epithelioid mesothelioma, developed in the United States, split epithelioid mesotheliomas into three prognostic groups with marked differences in survival. Now, this three-tiered nuclear grading system has been combined with the presence or absence of necrosis to form the currently recommended two-tiered grading system of low- and high-grade epithelioid mesothelioma. This review will focus on the development of this grading system in mesothelioma, the grading system's shortcomings, and the application of the grading system to cytology specimens and other extra-pleural sites. Lastly, this review will briefly discuss alternative grading systems and future considerations.
Collapse
|
5
|
Parisi A, Rossi F, De Filippis C, Paoloni F, Felicetti C, Mammarella A, Pecci F, Lupi A, Berardi R. Current Evidence and Future Perspectives about the Role of PARP Inhibitors in the Treatment of Thoracic Cancers. Onco Targets Ther 2023; 16:585-613. [PMID: 37485307 PMCID: PMC10362869 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s272563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition has become a promising therapeutic option for several tumors, especially for those harboring a BRCA 1-2 mutation or a deficit in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway. Nevertheless, to date, PARP inhibitors are still not largely used for thoracic malignancies neither as a single agent nor in combination with other treatments. Recently, a deeper understanding of HRR mechanisms, alongside the development of new targeted and immunotherapy agents, particularly against HRR-deficient tumors, traced the path to new treatment strategies for many tumor types including lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma. The aim of this review is to sum up the current knowledge about cancer-DNA damage response pathways inhibition and to update the status of recent clinical trials investigating the use of PARP inhibitors, either as monotherapy or in combination with other agents for the treatment of thoracic malignancies. We will also briefly discuss available evidence on Poly(ADP-Ribose) Glycohydrolase (PARG) inhibitors, a novel promising therapeutic option in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Parisi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, 60126, Italy
| | - Francesca Rossi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, 60126, Italy
| | - Chiara De Filippis
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, 60126, Italy
| | - Francesco Paoloni
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, 60126, Italy
| | - Cristiano Felicetti
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, 60126, Italy
| | - Alex Mammarella
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, 60126, Italy
| | - Federica Pecci
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, 60126, Italy
| | - Alessio Lupi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, 60126, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, 60126, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
RhoA and vigilin are candidates for immunohistochemical markers for epithelioid malignant mesothelioma. Sci Rep 2022; 12:18519. [PMID: 36323745 PMCID: PMC9630375 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20334-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Diagnostic markers of malignant mesothelioma (MM) have been extensively investigated. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers, such as calretinin, have been used for pathologic diagnosis. However, more diagnostic markers are required to improve the specificity and sensitivity of pathologic diagnosis. This study proposed two proteins as diagnostic markers for epithelioid MM. One is RhoA, an MM mutation-susceptible locus-derived protein, and another is vigilin, a lung small cell carcinoma marker. IHC was performed using 93 MM (epithelioid, 71 cases; sarcomatoid, 13 cases; and biphasic, 9 cases), 64 lung adenocarcinoma (LAC), 60 lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSC), and 14 normal mesothelial (NM) tissues. The majority of epithelioid MM cases were positive for both RhoA and vigilin, whereas both IHCs showed lower stainability in biphasic and sarcomatoid MM. Besides, both IHCs showed significantly higher stainability for RhoA and vigilin in epithelioid MM than in LAC and LSC (p < 0.05). Chi-square tests showed that both RhoA and vigilin IHC positive rate in epithelioid MM was not significantly different from that of calretinin (p > 0.05). In the differential diagnosis of MM from lung cancer, the accuracy and specificity of RhoA, vigilin, and calretinin staining were almost equivalent. Further, H-score test showed that there was no significant difference between RhoA versus calretinin and vigilin versus calretinin in IHC positivity in epithelioid MM (p > 0.05). In conclusion, RhoA and vigilin may be candidates for immunohistochemical markers for epithelioid MM.
Collapse
|
7
|
BAP1 loss by immunohistochemistry predicts improved survival to first line platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy for pleural mesothelioma patients: A validation study. J Thorac Oncol 2022; 17:921-930. [PMID: 35489694 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is an aggressive malignancy with no identified predictive biomarkers. We assessed whether tumour BRCA associated protein 1 (BAP1) status is a predictive biomarker for survival in patients receiving first-line combination platinum/pemetrexed therapy.introduction METHODS: PM cases (n=114) from Aalborg, Denmark were stained for BAP1 on tissue microarrays. Demographic, clinical and survival data were extracted from registries and medical records. Surgical cases were excluded. BAP1 status was associated with overall survival (OS) by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods. Results were validated in an independent cohort from Perth, Australia (n=234). RESULTS BAP1 loss was demonstrated in 62% and 60.3% of all Danish and Australian samples respectively. BAP1 loss was an independent predictor of OS in multivariate analyses corrected for histology, performance status, age, sex and treatment (HR = 2.49, p < 0.001 and 1.48, p = 0.01, respectively). First-line platinum/pemetrexed treated patients with BAP1 loss had significantly longer median survival than those with retained BAP1 in both the Danish (20.1 vs 7.3 months, p < 0.001) and Australian cohorts (19.6 vs 11.1 months, p < 0.01). Survival in patients with BAP1 retained and treated with platinum/pemetrexed was similar as in those with best supportive care (BSC). There was a higher OS in BSC patients with BAP1 loss, but significant only in the Australian cohort (16.8 vs 8.3 months, p < 0.01).results CONCLUSION: BAP1 is a predictive biomarker for survival following first-line combination platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy and a potential prognostic marker in PM. BAP1 in tumour is a promising clinical tool for treatment stratification. CONCLUSION
Collapse
|
8
|
Murrone A, Cantini L, Pecci F, Cognigni V, Copparoni C, Rinaldi S, Fiordoliva I, Monaco F, Rubini C, Barbisan F, Cimadamore A, Giampieri R, Bianchi F, Tomasetti M, Amati M, Santarelli L, Berardi R. BRCA-associated protein 1 (BAP1) and miR-31 combination predicts outcomes in epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:5741-5751. [PMID: 34795923 PMCID: PMC8575852 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Background Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive disease, with few available treatment options. Identification of novel prognostic and predictive biomarkers is a priority. In MPM patients, BRCA-associated protein 1 (BAP1) alterations are detected in about 60% of cases and miR-31 seems to be involved in BAP1 regulation at post-transcriptional level. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interaction between BAP1 and miR-31 in MPM and their prognostic role in MPM. Methods The expression of BAP1 and miR-31 was analyzed in tissues of 55 MPM patients treated with first-line chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test was used to investigate differences among subgroups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate independent predictors of survival. Results In the whole cohort, loss of BAP1 was associated with a significant improvement in OS, but not in PFS. Lower miR-31 levels were detected in epithelioid MPM (e-MPM) compared to the non-epithelioid subtypes and resulted associated with BAP1 loss. By looking at the e-MPM subgroup, loss of BAP1 was not able to predict clinical outcome. Conversely, miR-31 levels were significantly associated with PFS (P=0.028), but not with OS (P=0.059). By combining the two biomarkers, e-MPM patients with BAP1 loss/low miR-31 levels showed a better prognosis compared to the ones with BAP1 retained/high miR-31 levels (median OS 22.6 vs. 17.0 months, P=0.017 and median PFS 8.7 vs. 5.1 months, P=0.020). The BAP1 and miR-31 combination was confirmed at multivariate analysis as an independent prognostic factor for e-MPM patients. Conclusions In this preliminary study, we found that the prognostic stratification of e-MPM patients may be improved by simultaneously assessing of BAP1 status and miR-31 levels. The two-biomarker score is useful to identify a subgroup of e-MPM tumors characterized by BAP1 retained and high miR-31 levels with worse clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albero Murrone
- Clinic Oncology, University Hospital-Marche Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Luca Cantini
- Clinic Oncology, University Hospital-Marche Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Federica Pecci
- Clinic Oncology, University Hospital-Marche Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Valeria Cognigni
- Clinic Oncology, University Hospital-Marche Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Cecilia Copparoni
- Clinic Oncology, University Hospital-Marche Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Silvia Rinaldi
- Clinic Oncology, University Hospital-Marche Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Ilaria Fiordoliva
- Clinic Oncology, University Hospital-Marche Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Federica Monaco
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Section of Occupational Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Corrado Rubini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Section of Anatomical Pathology, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Francesca Barbisan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Section of Anatomical Pathology, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alessia Cimadamore
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Section of Anatomical Pathology, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Giampieri
- Clinic Oncology, University Hospital-Marche Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Francesca Bianchi
- Clinic Oncology, University Hospital-Marche Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Marco Tomasetti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Section of Occupational Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Monica Amati
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Section of Occupational Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Lory Santarelli
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Section of Occupational Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Clinic Oncology, University Hospital-Marche Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Establishment and Characterization of Patient-Derived Xenografts (PDXs) of Different Histology from Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12123846. [PMID: 33419364 PMCID: PMC7766019 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare tumor with unfavorable prognosis for which new therapeutic interventions are urgently needed. The aim of our study was to develop a preclinical model representative of the different histotypes found in human tumors that can be used as models for the discovery of new treatments and combinations. We successfully generated patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) from MPM, which strongly resembled the tumors of origin in terms of morphology and immunohistochemistry. These tumors, when growing in mice, poorly respond to cisplatin, a finding that aligned with the clinical results. From one of the PDXs, we generated 2D and 3D cultures maintaining the phenotypical characteristics of human tumors and PDXs. Altogether, these preclinical models represent a useful tool for the discovery of new targets and drug combinations. Abstract Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a very aggressive tumor originating from mesothelial cells. Although several etiological factors were reported to contribute to MPM onset, environmental exposure to asbestos is certainly a major risk factor. The latency between asbestos (or asbestos-like fibers) exposure and MPM onset is very long. MPM continues to be a tumor with poor prognosis despite the introduction of new therapies including immunotherapy. One of the major problems is the low number of preclinical models able to recapitulate the features of human tumors. This impacts the possible discovery of new treatments and combinations. Methods: In this work, we aimed to generate patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) from MPM patients covering the three major histotypes (epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and mixed) occurring in the clinic. To do this, we obtained fresh tumors from biopsies or pleurectomies, and samples were subcutaneously implanted in immunodeficient mice within 24 h. Results: We successfully isolated different PDXs and particularly concentrated our efforts on three covering the three histotypes. The tumors that grew in mice compared well histologically with the tumors of origin, and showed stable growth in mice and a low response to cisplatin, as was observed in the clinic. Conclusions: These models are helpful in testing new drugs and combinations that, if successful, could rapidly translate to the clinical setting.
Collapse
|