Real-world clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer

Efficacy and safety of different cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

There is no standard consensus on the optimal number of cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy prior to surgery for patients with locoregionally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We carried out a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy with different treatment cycles in order to provide valuable information for clinical decision-making.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched before May 2023. The included studies were categorized based on different treatment cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy to assess their respective efficacy and safety in patients with resectable NSCLC.

Results

Incorporating data from 29 studies with 1331 patients, we found major pathological response rates of 43 % (95%CI, 34-52 %) with two cycles and 33 % (95%CI, 22-45 %) with three cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Radiological response rates were 39 % (95%CI, 28-50 %) and 56 % (95%CI, 44-68 %) for two and three cycles, respectively, with higher incidence rates of severe adverse events (SAEs) in the three-cycle group (32 %; 95%CI, 21-50 %). Despite similar rates of R0 resection between two and three cycles, the latter showed a slightly higher surgical delay rate (1 % vs. 7 %). Neoadjuvant treatment modes significantly affected outcomes, with the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy demonstrating superiority in improving pathological and radiological response rates, while the incidence of SAEs in patients receiving combination therapy remained within an acceptable range (23 %; 95%CI, 15-35 %). However, regardless of the treatment mode administered, an increase in the number of treatment cycles did not result in substantial improvement in pathological response rates.

Conclusion

There are clear advantages of combining immunotherapy and chemotherapy in neoadjuvant settings. Increasing the number of cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy from two to three primarily may not substantially improve the overall efficacy, while increasing the risk of adverse events. Further analysis of the outcomes of four cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy is necessary.

Perioperative Immunotherapy for Node-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-Current Evidence and Future Directions

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has gone from an idea to an indication in locally advanced lung cancer. Several phase III trials have demonstrated the superiority of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy compared with chemotherapy in this setting. Although such progress has revolutionized the treatment of locally advanced disease, the unmet needs of stage I and stage II patients without lymph node disease have largely been underrepresented in existing trials. Up-front resection with few patients going on to complete adjuvant therapy remains the norm for most stage I and II patients. Emerging evidence now supports the exploration of supplemental checkpoint blockade in well-selected early-stage, node-negative patients with large tumors and no actionable driver mutations. Although concerns surrounding safety and risk exist, patient selection could be substantially improved using novel biomarker approaches that leverage our understanding of the tumor immune microenvironment of lung cancer. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the opportunities and controversies of perioperative immunotherapy in node-negative lung cancer.

Delta-radiomics features for predicting the major pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

To investigate if delta-radiomics features have the potential to predict the major pathological response (MPR) to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

Two hundred six stage IIA-IIIB NSCLC patients from three institutions (Database1 = 164; Database2 = 21; Database3 = 21) who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and surgery were included. Patients in Database1 were randomly assigned to the training dataset and test dataset, with a ratio of 0.7:0.3. Patients in Database2 and Database3 were used as two independent external validation datasets. Contrast-enhanced CT scans were obtained at baseline and before surgery. The delta-radiomics features were defined as the relative net change of radiomics features between baseline and preoperative. The delta-radiomics model and pre-treatment radiomics model were established. The performance of Immune-Related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST) for predicting MPR was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Half of the patients (106/206, 51.5%) showed MPR after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. For predicting MPR, the delta-radiomics model achieved a satisfying area under the curves (AUCs) values of 0.768, 0.732, 0.833, and 0.716 in the training, test, and two external validation databases, respectively, which showed a superior predictive performance than the pre-treatment radiomics model (0.644, 0.616, 0.475, and 0.608). Compared with iRECIST criteria (0.624, 0.572, 0.650, and 0.466), a mixed model that combines delta-radiomics features and iRECIST had higher AUC values for MPR prediction of 0.777, 0.761, 0.850, and 0.670 in four sets.

CONCLUSION

The delta-radiomics model demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to pre-treatment radiomics model and iRECIST criteria in predicting MPR preoperatively in neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for stage II-III NSCLC.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Delta-radiomics features based on the relative net change of radiomics features between baseline and preoperative CT scans serve a vital support tool in accurately identifying responses to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, which can help physicians make more appropriate treatment decisions.

KEY POINTS

• The performances of pre-treatment radiomics model and iRECIST model in predicting major pathological response of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy were unsatisfactory. • The delta-radiomics features based on relative net change of radiomics features between baseline and preoperative CT scans may be used as a noninvasive biomarker for predicting major pathological response of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. • Combining delta-radiomics features and iRECIST can further improve the predictive performance of responses to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy protocols and cycles for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

This study evaluated the use of different neoadjuvant immunotherapy cycles and regimens for non-small cell lung cancer.

Materials and methods

Databases were searched for articles published up until December 2023. Data on the major pathologic response (MPR), complete pathologic response (pCR), radiological response, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), surgical resection, surgical complications, R0 resection, and conversion to thoracotomy were collected. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the treatment regimens and cycles. Stata/MP software was used for statistical analyses.

Results

In total, 2430 individuals were assessed from 44 studies. Compared with those following neoadjuvant immunotherapy alone (MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs: ES=0.26/0.07/0.43/0.08, 95% CI: 0.18-0.34/0.04-0.10/0.28-0.58/0.04-0.14), the MPR and pCR rates, incidence of TRAEs and SAEs following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy increased significantly (MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs: ES=0.55/0.34/0.81/0.22, 95% CI: 0.48-0.63/0.28-0.41/0.69-0.90/0.13-0.33, P=0.001/0.002/0.009/0.034). No significant differences were found in the surgical resection, surgical complications, R0 resection, or conversion to thoracotomy. In the chemoimmunotherapy group, no statistically significant differences were found in the MPR and pCR rates, incidence of TRAEs and SAEs in the two-cycle, three-cycle and four-cycle groups (MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs: ES=0.50;0.70;0.36/0.32;0.49;0.18/0.95;0.85;0.95/0.34;0.27;0.37, P=0.255/0.215/0.253/0.848). In the ICIs group, there was little change in the MPR and pCR rates, incidence of TRAEs and SAEs in the two-cycle group compared to the three-cycle group. (MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs: ES=0.28;0.20/0.06;0.08/0.45;0.35/0.10;0.02, P=0.696/0.993/0.436/0.638). The neoadjuvant treatment cycle had no significant effect on surgical resection, surgical complications, R0 resection, or conversion to thoracotomy in both regimens.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy significantly increased the rate of tumor pathological remission compared to neoadjuvant immunotherapy alone but also increased the incidence of TRAEs and SAEs. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy are found to be favorable when administered for a duration of three cycles, in comparison to both two and four cycles.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42023407415.

Peripheral blood inflammatory biomarkers dynamics reflect treatment response and predict prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients with neoadjuvant immunotherapy

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has significantly changed the therapeutic approach for treating patients with surgically resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, peripheral blood inflammation-based biomarkers as well as previously less focused eosinophil fraction, modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were systematically included to comprehensively analyze their potential in predicting neoadjuvant immunotherapy efficacy and prognosis. We enrolled 189 patients (94 in training and 95 in validation cohorts) with stage I-III B surgically resectable NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy from the National Cancer Center of China. Baseline and post-treatment eosinophils fraction, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), PNI, mGPS, and their changes were calculated and analyzed for correlation with neoadjuvant immunotherapy efficacy and prognosis. In patients in the major pathological response (MPR) group, the post-treatment eosinophil fraction was significantly high, and NLR, PLR, SII, and MLR were significantly lower compared to the non-MPR group in both the training and validation cohorts. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that post-treatment, eosinophil fraction and SII and their changing were two of the most important factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that post-treatment eosinophil fraction, SII, mGPS, and ΔSII could independently predict MPR in patients treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Survival analysis showed a significant correlation between high post-treatment NLR, PLR, SII, mGPS, and their changes in ΔNLR and ΔSII elevation with poor overall survival and event-free survival of patients. Our results suggest that inflammatory biomarkers could predict the patient's response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy and prognosis.

Clinical utility of [18F]FDG PET/CT in the assessment of mediastinal lymph node disease after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

The performance of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the prediction of ypN2 disease in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has not been reported. This multicenter study investigated the utility of PET/CT to assess ypN2 disease in these patients.

METHODS

A total of 181 consecutive patients (chemoimmunotherapy = 86, chemotherapy = 95) at four institutions were enrolled in this study. Every patient received a PET/CT scan prior to surgery and complete resection with systematic nodal dissection. The diagnostic performance was evaluated through area under the curve (AUC). Kaplan-Meier method and Cox analysis were performed to identify the risk factors affecting recurrences.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT for ypN2 diseases were 0.667, 0.835, and 0.779, respectively. Therefore, the AUC was 0.751. Compared with the false positive cases, the mean value of max standardized uptake value (SUVmax) (6.024 vs. 2.672, p < 0.001) of N2 nodes was significantly higher in true positive patients. Moreover, the SUVmax of true positive (7.671 vs. 5.976, p = 0.365) and false (2.433 vs. 2.339, p = 0.990) positive cases were similar between chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy, respectively. Survival analysis proved that pathologic N (ypN) 2 patients could be stratified by PET/CT-N2(+ vs. -) for both chemoimmunotherapy (p = 0.023) and chemotherapy (p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

PET/CT is an accurate and non-invasive test for mediastinal restaging of NSCLC patients who receive neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. The ypN2 patients with PET/CT-N2( +) are identified as an independent prognostic factor compared with PET/CT-N2(-).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) plays an integral role during disease diagnosis, staging, and therapeutic response assessments in patients with NSCLC. PET/CT could be an effective non-invasive tool for predicting ypN2 diseases after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

KEY POINTS

• PET/CT could serve as an effective non-invasive tool for predicting ypN2 diseases. • The ypN2 patients with PET/CT-N2( +) were a strong and independent prognostic factor. • The application of PET/CT for restaging should be encouraged in clinical practice.

Efficacy, safety, and survival of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in operable non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy may benefit patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its impact requires further investigation.

Methods

A meta-analysis was conducted. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched. The study was registered in PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42022360893).

Results

60 studies of 3,632 patients were included. Comparing with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy showed higher pCR (RR: 4.71, 95% CI: 3.69, 6.02), MPR (RR, 3.20, 95% CI: 2.75, 3.74), and ORR (RR, 1.46, 95% CI: 1.21, 1.77), fewer surgical complications (RR: 0.67, 95%CI: 0.48, 0.94), higher R0 resection rate (RR: 1.06, 95%CI: 1.03, 1.10, I2 = 52%), and longer 1-year and 2-year OS, without affecting TRAEs. For neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in NSCLC, the pooled pCR rate was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.31, 0.39), MPR was 0.59 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.63), and ORR was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.76). The pooled incidence of all grade TRAEs was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.60, 0.81), and that of >= grade 3 TRAEs was 0.24 (95% CI: 0.16, 0.32). The surgical complications rate was 0.13 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.18) and R0 resection rate was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.99). The pooled 1-year OS was 0.97 (95%CI: 0.96, 0.99), and 2-year OS was 0.89 (95%CI: 0.83, 0.94). Patients with squamous cell carcinoma, stage III or higher PD-L1 performed better. Notably, no significant differences were observed in pCR, MPR, and ORR between 2 or more treatment cycles. Pembrolizumab-, or toripalimab-based neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy demonstrated superior efficacy and tolerable toxicity.

Conclusion

According to our analysis, reliable efficacy, safety, and survival of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for operable NSCLC were demonstrated.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022360893, identifier CRD42022360893.

Efficacy and surgical safety of sequential surgical resection after pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for initial unresectable stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is effective in resectable NSCLC. However, its role in unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients remains controversial. This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy followed by surgical resection to treat initial unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 59 initial unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients who received induction pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy between June 2019 and April 2022. Clinical characteristics, radiological and pathological responses, and survival outcomes were collected and evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifity-nine initial unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients were identified and divided into surgery (n = 23) and non-surgery (n = 36) groups with a median follow-up time of 15.0 months. The median PFS/DFS of the surgery group was significantly longer than the non-surgery group (not reached vs. 15.5 months, p = 0.0031). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached in both groups, and the OS rate was 100% (23/23) in the surgery group and 83.3% (30/36) in the non-surgery group. The pathological analysis suggested that 13 of 23 patients (56.5%) achieved major pathological response (MPR) or pathological complete response (pCR), and more squamous cell carcinoma cases were observed in the MPR group compared to the non-MPR group (p = 0.034). All patients in the surgery group had an R0 resection, and no surgical-related mortality was recorded; only three patients (13.0%) experienced any postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, surgical resection after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy was promising for initial unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients, with a high MPR rate and good surgical safety.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy cycle number selection for non-small cell lung cancer and clinical outcomes: a real-world analysis

Objectives

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is the optimal choice in the treatment of NSCLC; however, the optimal number of therapeutic cycles remains unclear. The primary aim of this study was to determine the optimal number of neoadjuvant therapeutic cycles in NSCLC.

Methods

This study was a real-world clinical analysis that included patients who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by surgery from January 2020 to August 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on the number of therapeutic cycles: 2-cycle group and 3-4-cycles group. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response (MPR) rate.

Results

A total of 251 patients were included: 150 in the 2-cycle group and 101 in the 3-4-cycles group. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the groups. The MPR in the 2-cycle group was 57.3% and not significantly different from that of 57.4% in the 3-4-cycles group (p=0.529). Thirty-two patients (31.7%) in the 3-4-cycles group underwent surgery > 42 days after the final cycle of neoadjuvant therapy, significantly more than the 24 patients (16.0%) in the 2-cycle group (p=0.003). The incidence of adverse events related to neoadjuvant therapy was higher in the 3-4-cycles vs 2-cycle groups (72.3% versus 58.0%, respectively; p=0.021), while the 2-cycle group had a higher rate of postoperative morbidities (28.0% versus 12.9%, respectively; p=0.004). Additionally, for patients with ≤ 44.2% regression in diameter on computed tomography after two cycles of treatment, the MPR rate was higher in the 3-4-cycles vs 2-cycle group (47.3% versus 29.9%, respectively; p=0.048). For cases with programmed death-ligand 1 expression, regarding tumor proportion score ≤ 10%, 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment increased the MPR rate compared with 2 cycles (37.5% versus 9.5%, respectively; p=0.041).

Conclusion

Our data support the positive role of chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of NSCLC. Extending to 3-4 cycles instead of 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy may improve the safety of surgery and result in a lower incidence of postoperative morbidities; however, the MPR rate may not increase significantly. CT re-evaluation during treatment and PD-L1 expression at initial diagnosis are potential indicators to guide the choice of the number of therapeutic cycles.

Does major pathological response after neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in resectable nonsmall-cell lung cancers predict prognosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Overall survival is the gold-standard outcome measure for phase 3 trials, but the need for a long follow-up period can delay the translation of potentially effective treatment to clinical practice. The validity of major pathological response (MPR) as a surrogate of survival for non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant immunotherapy remains unclear.

METHODS

Eligibility was resectable stage I-III NSCLC and delivery of PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 inhibitors prior to resection; other forms/modalities of neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapies were allowed. Statistics utilized the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect or random-effect model depending on the heterogeneity ( I2 ).

RESULTS

Fifty-three trials (seven randomized, 29 prospective nonrandomized, 17 retrospective) were identified. The pooled rate of MPR was 53.8%. Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy achieved higher MPR (OR 6.19, 4.39-8.74, P <0.00001). MPR was associated with improved disease-free survival/progression-free survival/event-free survival (HR 0.28, 0.10-0.79, P =0.02) and overall survival (HR 0.80, 0.72-0.88, P <0.0001). Patients with stage III (vs I/II) and PD-L1 ≥1% (vs <1%) more likely achieved MPR (OR 1.66,1.02-2.70, P =0.04; OR 2.21,1.28-3.82, P =0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy achieved higher MPR in NSCLC patients, and increased MPR might be associated with survival benefits treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy. It appears that the MPR may serve as a surrogate endpoint of survival to evaluate neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Organ preservation strategies after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has shown a good therapeutic effect on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which also opens up the possibility of applying organ preservation strategies. This study investigated the feasibility of modified surgery after potent neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in central type NSCLC.

METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, patients with central type NSCLC who received 2-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy between January 2019 and June 2022 at Air Force Medical University Tangdu Hospital and Peking University People's Hospital were eligible. Patients were divided into modified and nonmodified groups according to the extent of surgery, after which, the safety and long-term prognosis of surgery were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were enrolled. Of 36 (42.9%) patients who underwent modified surgery, 21 patients underwent lobectomy, 12 patients underwent lobectomy with bronchoplasty, 2 patients underwent sleeve lobectomy, and 1 patient underwent bilobectomy. The modification rate for the initially estimated pneumonectomy, sleeve lobectomy, and bilobectomy was 48.6, 44.8, and 30%, respectively. Grades II-V postoperative complications were found in 5 (13.9%) patients in the modified group and 17 (35.4%) patients in the nonmodified group (relative risk, 0.393; 95% CI, 0.016-0.963; P =0.026). No significant difference was observed regarding the surgical approach, operative duration, blood loss, or R0 resection rate. The 2-year local recurrence rate was 3.7% (95% CI, 0.004-0.175) and 5.2% (95% CI, 0.012-0.168) in the modified group and nonmodified group, respectively. The 1-year PFS rate of modified and nonmodified groups was 97.1% (95% CI, 83.7-99.8) and 86.9% (95% CI, 73.4-94.4), respectively, while 2-year PFS were 89.8% (95% CI, 74.1-96.9) and 71.8% (95% CI, 56.7-83.4), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Applying organ preservation strategies, that is, undergoing modified surgery after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, is feasible for selected central type NSCLC patients with favorable safety and long-term survival.

Immunotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: A system review

With the addition of immunotherapy, lung cancer, one of the most common cancers with high mortality rates, has broadened the treatment landscape. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated significant efficacy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are now used as the first-line therapy for metastatic disease, consolidation therapy after radiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced disease, and adjuvant therapy after surgical resection and chemotherapy for resectable disease. The use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with early-stage NSCLC, however, is still debatable. We will address several aspects, namely the initial efficacy of monotherapy, the efficacy of combination chemotherapy, immunotherapy-related biomarkers, adverse effects, ongoing randomized controlled trials, and current issues and future directions for immunotherapy in early-stage NSCLC will be discussed here.

Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: a single-center retrospective study

Background

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has been increasingly applied to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the comparison between robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in the feasibility and oncological efficacy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is scarce. This study aims to assess the superiorities of RATS over (VATS) concerning short-term outcomes in treating NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

Methods

NSCLC patients receiving RATS or VATS lobectomy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2019 to 2022 were retrospectively identified. Baseline clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and survival profiles were analyzed.

Results

Forty-six NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were included and divided into the RATS (n=15) and VATS (n=31) groups. The baseline clinical characteristics and induction-related adverse events were comparable between the two groups (all p>0.050). The 30-day mortality in the RATS and VATS groups were 0% and 3.23%, respectively (p=1.000). Patients undergoing RATS were associated with reduced surgical-related intensive unit care (ICU) stay than those receiving VATS (0.0 [0.0-0.0] vs. 0.0 [0.0-1.0] days, p=0.026). Moreover, RATS assessed more N1 LNs (6.27 ± 1.94 vs 4.90 ± 1.92, p=0.042) and LN stations (3.07 ± 1.03 vs 2.52 ± 0.57, p=0.038) compared with VATS. By comparison, no difference was found in surgical outcomes, pathological results, and postoperative complications between the RATS and VATS groups (all p>0.050). Finally, RATS and VATS achieved comparable one-year recurrence-free survival (82.96% vs. 85.23%, p=0.821) and the timing of central nervous system, LN, and bone recurrences (all p>0.050).

Conclusion

RATS is safe and feasible for NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, reducing surgical-related ICU stay, assessing increased N1 LNs and stations, and achieving similar survival profiles to VATS.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for advanced, resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (nIT) is a rapidly emerging paradigm for advanced resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objectives of this PRISMA/MOOSE/PICOD-guided systematic review and meta-analysis were (1) to assess the safety and efficacy of nIT, (2) to compare the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nCIT) versus chemotherapy alone (nCT), and (3) to explore predictors of pathologic response with nIT and their association with outcomes.

METHODS

Eligibility was resectable stage I-III NSCLC and the receipt of programmed death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1)/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 inhibitors before resection; other forms and modalities of neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapies were allowed. For statistical analysis, the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect or random-effect model was used, depending on the heterogeneity (I2 ).

RESULTS

Sixty-six articles met the criteria (eight randomized studies, 39 prospective nonrandomized studies, and 19 retrospective studies). The pooled pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 28.1%. The estimated grade ≥3 toxicity rate was 18.0%. Compared with nCT, nCIT achieved higher rates of pCR (odds ratio [OR], 7.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.49-12.97; p < .001), progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.67; p < .001), and overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.36-0.74; p = .0003) but yielded similar toxicity rates (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.67-1.52; p = .97). The results remained robust on sensitivity analysis when all retrospective publications were removed. pCR was associated with improved PFS (HR, 0.25; 0.15-0.43; p < .001) and OS (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.10-0.67; p = .005). PD-L1 expressors (≥1%) were more likely to achieve a pCR (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.22-7.03; p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced resectable NSCLC, neoadjuvant immunotherapy was safe and efficacious. nCIT improved pathologic response rates and PFS/OS over nCT, particularly in patients who had tumors that expressed PD-L1, without increasing toxicities.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

This meta-analysis of 66 studies showed that neoadjuvant immunotherapy for advanced resectable non-small cell lung cancer is safe and efficacious. Compared with chemotherapy alone, chemoimmunotherapy improved pathologic response rates and survival, particularly for patients who had tumors that expressed programmed cell death ligand-1, without increasing toxicities.

"Major pathologic response" in lymph nodes: a modified nodal classification for non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy

We aim to examine the prognostic value of major pathologic response in metastatic lymph nodes (mLN-MPR) after immunochemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and demonstrate the pathological characteristic of regression in mLN. Adult patients consecutively undergone neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and radical-intent surgery for initial stage cIII NSCLC between 2020 and 2021 were included. Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained slides of paraffinembedded sections of the degree of pathologic response in the primary tumor (PT) and its paired involved LNs were reviewed. Imaging mass cytometry was conducted to quantify the immunological status. With 10% as residual viable tumor (RVT) cutoff, mLN-MPR (HR: 0.34, 95%CI: 0.14-0.78; P = 0.011, ref: mLN-MPR(-)) showed more significant correlation with DFS than ypN0 (HR: 0.40, 95%CI: 0.17-0.94; P = 0.036, ref: ypN1-N2). And mLN-MPR combined with PT-MPR, compared with ypN stage combined with PT-MPR (p-value: 0.030 vs. 0.117), can better distinguished the DFS curves of the 4 subgroups of patients. mLN-MPR(+)/PT-MPR(+) patients had the best prognosis compared with other subgroups. Pathologic responses of RVT in PT and paired regional LNs [MPR inconsistency rate: 21/53 (39.6%)], and across different LNs could be inconsistent, especially in squamous cell carcinoma. RVT% in mLNs after immunochemotherapy appeared to be polarized [16 (30.2%) cases with RVT ≥ 70%; 34 (64.2%) with RVT ≤ 10%]. Partial regression of LN metastasis could present with distinct immune subtypes: immune-inflamed or immune-evacuation subtype, and the former presented with higher CD3, CD8, and PD-1 expression in the invasive margin. mLN-MPR demonstrated a potential prognostic value in predicting DFS in patients treated with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, but further research is needed to validate its usefulness for other survival outcomes, including OS.

The predictive value of inflammatory biomarkers for major pathological response in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and its association with the immune-related tumor microenvironment: a multi-center study

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory biomarkers in the peripheral blood have been established as predictors for immunotherapeutic efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether they can also predict major pathological response (MPR) in neoadjuvant setting remains unclear.

METHODS

In this multi-center retrospective study, 122 and 92 stage I-IIIB NSCLC patients from six hospitals who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by surgery were included in the discovery and external validation cohort, respectively. Baseline and on-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were calculated and associated with MPR. Furthermore, resected tumor samples from 37 patients were collected for RNA-sequencing to investigate the immune-related tumor microenvironment.

RESULTS

In both the discovery and validation cohorts, the on-treatment NLR, dNLR, PLR, and SII levels were significantly lower in the patients with MPR versus non-MPR. On-treatment SII remained an independent predictor of MPR in multivariate logistic regression analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) of on-treatment SII for predicting MPR was 0.75 (95%CI, 0.67-0.84) in the discovery cohort. Moreover, the predictive value was further improved by combining the on-treatment SII and radiological tumor regression data, demonstrating an AUC of 0.82 (95%CI, 0.74-0.90). The predictive accuracy was validated in the external cohort. Compared with the SII-high group, patients with SII-Low were associated with the activated B cell receptor signaling pathway and a higher intratumoral immune cell infiltration level.

CONCLUSIONS

On-treatment SII was independently associated with MPR in NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Further prospective studies are warranted.

Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake values in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Reliable predictive markers are lacking for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. The present study investigated the utility of SUV_max values acquired from PET/CT to predict the response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for resectable NSCLC.

MATERAL AND METHODS

SUV_max, clinical and pathological outcomes, were collected from patients in 5 hospitals. Patients who received dynamic PET/CT surveillance were divided into cohorts A (chemoimmunotherapy) and B (chemotherapy), respectively, while cohort C (chemoimmunotherapy) comprised patients undergoing post-therapy PET/CT. Associations between SUV_max and major pathologic response (MPR) were evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

A total of 129 cases with an MPR rate of 46.5 % was identified. In neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, ΔSUV_max% (AUC: 0.890, 95 % CI: 0.761-0.949) and post-therapy SUV_max (AUC: 0.933, 95 % CI: 0.802-0.959) could accurately predict MPR. On the contrary, the baseline SUV_max was not associated with MPR (p = 0.184). Furthermore, an independent cohort C proved that post-therapy SUV_max could serve as an independent predictor (AUC: 0.928, 95 % CI: 0.823-0.958). In addition, robust predictive performance could be observed when we use the optimal cut-off point of both ΔSUV_max% (54.4 %, AUC: 0.912, 95 % CI: 0.824-0.994) and post-therapy SUV_max (3.565, AUC: 0.912, 95 % CI: 0.824-0.994) in neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. The RNA data revealed that the expression of PFKFB4, a key enzyme in glycolysis, was positively correlated with SUV_max value and tumor cell proliferation after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlighted that the ΔSUV_max% and remained SUV_max were accurate and non-invasive tests for the prediction of MPR after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

Tumor regression rate, PD-L1 expression, pembrolizumab/nab-paclitaxel-based regimens, squamous cell carcinoma, and comorbidities were independently associated with efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIO) is more effective than neoadjuvant immunotherapy alone for pathological response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, but the processes for determining patient suitability for its implementation are not clear. We aimed to identify the most relevant factors and build a convenient model to select NSCLC patients who would benefit most from NCIO.

Methods

 We retrospectively collected the clinical data of patients with locally advanced NSCLC who received NCIO followed by surgery at our institution between January 2019 and July 2022.

Results

A total of 101 eligible stage IIB-IIIC NSCLC patients were included. After NCIO, all patients successfully underwent surgical resection. A total of 46.53% (47/101) of patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR), and 70.30% (71/101) achieved major pathologic response (MPR). Tumor regression rate (adjusted odds ratio OR = 12.33), PD-L1 expression (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 9.66), pembrolizumab/nab-paclitaxel-based regimens (adjusted OR = 4.92), and comorbidities (adjusted OR = 0.16) were independently associated with pCR rate (all P < 0.05). Tumor regression rate (adjusted OR = 8.45), PD-L1 expression (adjusted OR = 5.35), and presence of squamous cell carcinoma (adjusted OR = 7.02) were independently associated with MPR rate (all P < 0.05). We established and validated an easy-to-use clinical model to predict pCR (with an area under the curve [AUC] of 0.848) and MPR (with an AUC of 0.847). Of note, the present study showed that CD4⁺ T-cell count/rate and total cholesterol (TC) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels in the peripheral blood of pre-NCIO patients were also significantly correlated with pathological response in univariate analyses.

Conclusions

The tumor regression rate, PD-L1 expression, pembrolizumab/nab-paclitaxel-based regimens, presence of squamous cell carcinoma, and comorbidities were the main influential factors for incidence of pCR/MPR in patients with stage IIB-IIIC NSCLC in the present study. Through predictive models, we can predict who will benefit most from NCIO prior to the emergence of clinical outcomes in locally advanced NSCLC.

A real-world comparison between neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy alone for resectable non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The impact of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy on pulmonary resection and related outcomes had been poorly reported in previous studies. The present study aims to clarify the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, and intraoperative difficulty in the following surgery, in comparison with chemotherapy alone in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed clinical stages IB-IIIB(T3-4N2) NSCLC, received neoadjuvant chemotherapy + PD-1 inhibitors (PD-1 + Chemo group) or chemotherapy alone (Chemo group) followed by surgery between December 2018 and December 2020 were included. The clinicopathological characteristics were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 69 NSCLC patients in the PD-1 + Chemo group and 121 in the Chemo group. The major pathological response (MPR) rate in the PD-1 + Chemo group was 49.3%, higher than that of 19.0% in the Chemo group (p < 0.001). The 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 79.3% and 60.2%, respectively, in the two groups (p = 0.048). Multivariate analysis identified surgical radicality (hazard ratio (HR), 2.954, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.527-5.714, p = 0.001), and pathological response (MPR(CR) vs. SD(PD), HR, 0.248, 95% CI, 0.107-0.572, p = 0.001) to be independent prognostic factors for DFS. Lobectomy was performed in 73.9% and 66.1% of patients, respectively, and bronchial sleeve resection/bronchoplasty rate was also comparable (43.4% vs. 40.5%, p = 0.688). More patients in the PD-1 + Chemo group received vascular sleeve resection/angioplasty (15.9% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.039) and pericardial resection (10.1% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.038). After propensity score matching analysis, pericardial resection rate was still slightly higher in the PD-1 + Chemo group (9.4% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.05). Perioperative morbidities within 30 days and mortality in 90 days were comparable between groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for NSCLC is safe and feasible, with higher MPR rates, as well as favorable DFS than chemotherapy alone. Surgical complexity might be increased in certain patients, with comparable perioperative morbidity and mortality.