Complete pathologic response to short-course neoadjuvant alectinib in mediastinal node positive (N2) ALK rearranged lung cancer

Alectinib in Early-Stage Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Challenges

BACKGROUND

Targeted therapies changed the treatment of advanced oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer and could also improve outcomes in resectable disease.

RESULTS

The ALINA trial evaluated the clinical benefit of adjuvant alectinib compared with standard chemotherapy and met the primary endpoint with a significant increase in disease-free survival at 2 years among anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive patients with stage IB-IIIA disease; two phase II trials (ALNEO and NAUTIKA1) are currently evaluating perioperative treatment with alectinib, and the results of the case reports published to date are encouraging.

CONCLUSION

In resectable anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive lung cancer, adjuvant alectinib represents the new standard of care and could soon be used in perioperative treatment.

A Review of the Current Approach and Treatment Landscape for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The therapeutic landscape of the management of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has drastically evolved with the incorporation of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Stage III NSCLC accounts for one-third of the cases and the treatment strategy of these locally advanced presentations are diverse, ranging from surgical to non-surgical options; with the incorporation of chemo-immunotherapy, radiation, and targeted therapies wherever applicable. The staging of this disease has also changed, and it is essential to have a strong multidisciplinary approach to do justice to patient care. In this article, we aim to navigate the nuanced approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of stage III NSCLC and expand on the evolution of the management of this disease.

Radiotherapy for tumors of the mediastinum - state of the art

Mediastinal tumors encompass a diverse range of malignancies, originating within or spreading to the mediastinum. The administration of radiotherapy within the anatomical confines of the mediastinum presents unique challenges owing to the close proximity of critical organs, including the heart, lungs, esophagus, and spinal cord. However, recent progress in imaging techniques, treatment modalities, and our understanding of tumor biology has significantly contributed to the development of effective and safe therapeutic strategies for mediastinal diseases. This review article aims to explore the latest innovations in radiotherapy and their practical applications in the management of mediastinal tumors, with a primary focus on lymphomas, thymomas, and thymic carcinomas. By examining these advancements, we seek to provide valuable insights into the current state of the art in radiotherapy for mediastinal malignancies, ultimately fostering improved patient outcomes and clinical decision-making.

Current and Future Treatment Options in the Management of Stage III NSCLC

For much of the past two decades, the treatment options for patients with stage III NSCLC were mostly stagnant. In the past 5 years, ongoing innovations have dovetailed alongside advances in biomarker testing, novel therapeutics, precision surgery, and radiotherapy, all of which are leading to an increase in more personalized option for the treatment. This review article will focus on several completed and ongoing initiatives involving treatment of patients with stage III NSCLC. First, it will tackle the progress made in curative treatment of unresectable stage III NSCLC, starting with PACIFIC, and branching out into topics such as concurrent immunotherapy and chemoradiation, intensification of consolidative immunotherapy, dual immunotherapy consolidation, and a reflection on those subpopulations that may not benefit from consolidative immunotherapy. Second, there will be discussion of novel strategies in the setting of resectable stage III disease, most notably neoadjuvant therapy using combined chemoimmunotherapy and immunotherapy alone before surgical resection. Third, it will delve into recent data evaluating adjuvant immunotherapy for resectable stage III NSCLC, including adjuvant targeted therapy (for those harboring driver mutations) and postoperative radiotherapy. Finally, a look to future trials/initiatives will be interspersed throughout the review, to reveal the ongoing efforts being made to continue to improve outcomes in this group of patients.

Pathological complete response to long-course neoadjuvant alectinib in lung adenocarcinoma with EML4-ALK rearrangement: report of two cases and systematic review of case reports

Objective

Despite the promising efficacy and tolerability of alectinib in treating advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the role of alectinib in neoadjuvant setting remains understudied in ALK-rearranged resectable lung cancer.

Methods

Our report concerns two cases of early-stage NSCLC with complete pathologic responses to off-label use of long-course neoadjuvant alectinib. PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched comprehensively for ALK-positive resectable cases with neoadjuvant alectinib. The papers were chosen following PRISMA recommendations. Seven cases from the literature and two present cases were evaluated.

Results

Two cases with stage IIB (cT3N0M0) EML4-ALK lung adenocarcinoma received long-course (more than 30 weeks) of neoadjuvant alectinib followed by R0 lobectomy with the complete pathological response. In our systematic review, 74 studies were included in the original search. Application of the screening criteria resulted in 18 articles deemed eligible for full-text reading. Following the application of the exclusion criteria, out of six papers, seven cases were selected for inclusion in the final analysis and were included in the systematic review. None of the studies were included in the quantitative analysis.

Conclusion

We report two cases of lung adenocarcinoma with resectable ALK-positive that achieved pCR with long-course neoadjuvant alectinib. Our cases and a systematic review of the literature support the feasibility of neoadjuvant alectinib treatment for NSCLC. However, large clinical trials must be conducted in the future to determine the treatment course and efficacy of the neoadjuvant alectinib modality.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022376804.

Clinical Stage III NSCLC Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy and Surgery: The Prognostic Role of Nodal Characteristics

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to analyze the prognostic factors in patients that underwent induction therapy and surgery for clinical stage III NSCLC. METHODS: Clinical and pathological characteristics of stage III NSCLC patients for N2 involvement that underwent neoadjuvant treatment (NAD) and surgery from 1/01/1998 to 31/12/2017 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Tumor characteristics, yClinical, yPathological stage and lymph node characteristics were correlated to Overall Survival (OS). RESULTS: The analysis was conducted on 180 patients. Five-year OS (5YOS) was 50.9%. Univariable analysis results revealed old age (p = 0.003), clinical N2 post-NAD (p = 0.01), pneumonectomy (0.005), persistent pathological N2 (p = 0.039, HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.09−2.68) and adjuvant therapy absence (p = 0.049) as significant negative prognostic factors. Multivariable analysis confirmed pN0N1 (p = 0.02, HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13−0.62) as a favorable independent prognostic factor and adjuvant therapy absence (p = 0.012, HR 2.61, 95% CI 1.23−5.50) as a negative prognostic factor. Patients with persistent N2 presented a 5YOS of 35.3% vs. 55.8% in pN0N1 patients. Regarding lymph node parameters, the lymph node ratio (NR) significantly correlated with OS: 5YOS of 67.6% in patients with NR < 50% vs. 29.5% in NR > 50% (p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Clinical response aided the stratification of prognosis in patients that underwent multimodal treatment for stage III NSCLC. Adjuvant therapy seemed to be an important option in these patients, while node ratio was a strong prognosticator in patients with persistent nodal involvement.