1
|
Gagrat ZD, Krockenberger M, Bhattacharya A, Gagrat BZ, Leduc CM, Matter MB, Fourrier KD, Mahoney DW, Edwards V DK, Lidgard GP, Limburg PJ, Johnson SC, Domanico MJ, Kisiel JB. Next-generation Multi-target Stool DNA Panel Accurately Detects Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Precancerous Lesions. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2024; 17:119-126. [PMID: 38224564 PMCID: PMC10911803 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-23-0285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
The multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test screens for colorectal cancer by analyzing DNA methylation/mutation and hemoglobin markers to algorithmically derive a qualitative result. A new panel of highly discriminant candidate methylated DNA markers (MDM) was recently developed. Performance of the novel MDM panel, with hemoglobin, was evaluated in a simulated screening population using archived stool samples weighted to early-stage colorectal cancer and prospectively collected advanced precancerous lesions (APL). Marker selection study (MSS) and separate preliminary independent verification studies (VS) were conducted utilizing samples from multi-center, case-control studies. Sample processing included targeted MDM capture, bisulfite conversion, and MDM quantitation. Fecal hemoglobin was quantified using ELISA. Samples were stratified into 75%/25% training-testing sets; model outcomes were cross-validated 1,000 times. All laboratory operators were blinded. The MSS included 232 cases (120 colorectal cancer/112 APLs) and 490 controls. The VS featured 210 cases (112 colorectal cancer/98 APLs) and 567 controls; APLs were 86.7% adenomas and 13.3% sessile serrated lesions (SSL). Average age was 65.5 (cases) and 63.2 (controls) years. Mean sensitivity in the VS from cross-validation was 95.2% for colorectal cancer and 57.2% for APLs, with specificities of 89.8% (no CRC/APLs) and 92.4% (no neoplasia). Subgroup analyses showed colorectal cancer sensitivities of 93.4% (stage I) and 94.2% (stage II). APL sensitivity was 82.9% for high-grade dysplasia, 73.4% for villous lesions, 49.8% for tubular lesions, and 30.2% for SSLs. These data support high sensitivity and specificity for a next-generation mt-sDNA test panel. Further evaluation of assay performance will be characterized in a prospective, multi-center clinical validation study (NCT04144738). PREVENTION RELEVANCE This study highlights performance of the next-generation mt-sDNA test, which exhibits high sensitivity and specificity for detecting colorectal cancer and APLs. This noninvasive option has potential to increase screening participation and clinical outcomes. A multi-center, clinical validation trial is underway. See related commentary by Bresalier, p. 93.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Douglas W. Mahoney
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | | | | | - John B. Kisiel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Toledo DEFWM, Bleijenberg AGC, Venema A, de Wit MJ, van Eeden S, Meijer GA, Carvalho B, Dekker E, Henneman P, IJspeert JEG, van Noesel CJM. Aberrant PRDM2 methylation as an early event in serrated lesions destined to evolve into microsatellite-instable colorectal cancers. J Pathol Clin Res 2024; 10:e348. [PMID: 38380944 PMCID: PMC10880511 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
Up to 30% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) develop from sessile serrated lesions (SSLs). Within the serrated neoplasia pathway, at least two principally distinct oncogenetic routes exist generating microsatellite-stable and microsatellite-instable CRCs, respectively. Aberrant DNA methylation (DNAm) is found early in the serrated pathway and might play a role in both oncogenetic routes. We studied a cohort of 23 SSLs with a small focus (<10 mm) of dysplasia or cancer, 10 of which were MLH1 deficient and 13 MLH1 proficient. By comparing, for each SSL, the methylation status of (1) the region of dysplasia or cancer (SSL-D), (2) the nondysplastic SSL (SSL), and (3) adjacent normal mucosa, differentially methylated probes (DMPs) and regions (DMRs) were assessed both genome-wide as well as in a tumor-suppressor gene-focused approach. By comparing DNAm of MLH1-deficient SSL-Ds with their corresponding SSLs, we identified five DMRs, including those annotating for PRDM2 and, not unexpectedly, MLH1. PRDM2 gene promotor methylation was associated with MLH1 expression status, as it was largely hypermethylated in MLH1-deficient SSL-Ds and hypomethylated in MLH1-proficient SSL-Ds. Significantly increased DNAm levels of PRDM2 and MLH1, in particular at 'critical' MLH1 probe sites, were to some extent already visible in SSLs as compared to normal mucosa (p = 0.02, p = 0.01, p < 0.0001, respectively). No DMRs, nor DMPs, were identified for SSLs destined to evolve into MLH1-proficient SSL-Ds. Our data indicate that, within both arms of the serrated CRC pathway, the majority of the epigenetic alterations are introduced early during SSL formation. Promoter hypermethylation of PRDM2 and MLH1 on the other hand specifically initiates in SSLs destined to transform into MLH1-deficient CRCs suggesting that the fate of SSLs may not necessarily result from a stochastic process but possibly is already imprinted and predisposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David EFWM van Toledo
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAmsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and MetabolismAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Arne GC Bleijenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAmsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and MetabolismAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Andrea Venema
- Department of Human Genetics, Epigenetics of disease, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and MetabolismAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Mireille J de Wit
- Department of PathologyAmsterdamAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical CenterThe Netherlands
| | - Susanne van Eeden
- Department of PathologyAmsterdamAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical CenterThe Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of PathologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Beatrice Carvalho
- Department of PathologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAmsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and MetabolismAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Peter Henneman
- Department of Human Genetics, Epigenetics of disease, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and MetabolismAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Joep EG IJspeert
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAmsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and MetabolismAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Carel JM van Noesel
- Department of PathologyAmsterdamAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical CenterThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Itzkowitz S, Farraye FA, Limburg PJ, Gagrat Z, Olson MC, Zella J, Kisiel JB. Assessment of Stool DNA Markers to Detect Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Multi-site Case-control Study. J Crohns Colitis 2023; 17:1436-1444. [PMID: 37166153 PMCID: PMC10588779 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The FDA-approved multitarget stool-DNA [mt-sDNA] test is a successful colorectal cancer [CRC] screening tool in average-risk individuals but is not indicated for patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. We determined the performance of the mt-sDNA assay without the haemoglobin component [mt-sDNAHgb-] in patients with IBD, while measuring sensitivity for colorectal cancer and advanced colorectal neoplasia [ACRN]. METHODS This was a multi-centre, proof-of-concept investigation in persons aged 18-84 years with a diagnosis of IBD, or primary sclerosing cholangitis [PSC] with IBD. Enrolment occurred between March 2013 and May 2016. Stool was tested with the mt-sDNA molecular markers only, minus the immunochemical haemoglobin component. RESULTS The analysis set contained 355 samples. The median age was 52 [range 39-62] years, 45.6% were female and 93% were White. Two-thirds [63%] had ulcerative colitis [UC] and 10.1% had PSC/IBD. Colonoscopy revealed cancer in 8.5% [N = 30], advanced precancerous lesions [APLs] in 9.3% [N = 33] and non-advanced precancerous lesions in 7.6% [N = 27], and three-quarters [74.7%, N = 265] had negative findings. mt-sDNAHgb- sensitivity was 73.3% for any stage cancers, and 76.2% for ACRN. Sensitivity was highest for IBD-associated high-grade dysplasia at 100% and 84.6% for IBD-associated low-grade dysplasia ≥1 cm. The test showed higher sensitivity and lower specificity in UC than in Crohn's disease. Increasing inflammation score was associated with a significant decrease in mt-sDNAHgb- test score [ = 0.028] amongst neoplasia-negative individuals, but not in patients with ACRN. CONCLUSIONS These data highlight the potential of multitarget stool-DNA marker testing as an important addition to colorectal cancer surveillance by complementing colonoscopic evaluations in IBD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Julia Zella
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Santini D, Botticelli A, Galvano A, Iuliani M, Incorvaia L, Gristina V, Taffon C, Foderaro S, Paccagnella E, Simonetti S, Fazio F, Scagnoli S, Pomati G, Pantano F, Perrone G, De Falco E, Russo A, Spinelli GP. Network approach in liquidomics landscape. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2023; 42:193. [PMID: 37542343 PMCID: PMC10401883 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-023-02743-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Tissue-based biopsy is the present main tool to explore the molecular landscape of cancer, but it also has many limits to be frequently executed, being too invasive with the risk of side effects. These limits and the ability of cancer to constantly evolve its genomic profile, have recently led to the need of a less invasive and more accurate alternative, such as liquid biopsy. By searching Circulating Tumor Cells and residues of their nucleic acids or other tumor products in body fluids, especially in blood, but also in urine, stools and saliva, liquid biopsy is becoming the future of clinical oncology. Despite the current lack of a standardization for its workflows, that makes it hard to be reproduced, liquid biopsy has already obtained promising results for cancer screening, diagnosis, prognosis, and risk of recurrence.Through a more accessible molecular profiling of tumors, it could become easier to identify biomarkers predictive of response to treatment, such as EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer and KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer, or Microsatellite Instability and Mismatch Repair as predictive markers of pembrolizumab response.By monitoring circulating tumor DNA in longitudinal repeated sampling of blood we could also predict Minimal Residual Disease and the risk of recurrence in already radically resected patients.In this review we will discuss about the current knowledge of limitations and strengths of the different forms of liquid biopsies for its inclusion in normal cancer management, with a brief nod to their newest biomarkers and its future implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Santini
- Oncologia Medica A, Policlinico Umberto 1, La Sapienza Università Di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Botticelli
- Oncologia Medica A, Policlinico Umberto 1, La Sapienza Università Di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Galvano
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Michele Iuliani
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Selcetta, Italy
| | - Lorena Incorvaia
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Valerio Gristina
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Chiara Taffon
- Anatomical Pathology Operative Research Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Anatomical Pathology, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Foderaro
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Selcetta, Italy
| | - Elisa Paccagnella
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, C.So Della Repubblica 79, 04100, Latina, Italy
| | - Sonia Simonetti
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Selcetta, Italy
| | - Federico Fazio
- UOC Oncologia Territoriale, Polo Pontino, La Sapienza Università Di Roma, Latina, Italy.
| | - Simone Scagnoli
- Oncologia Medica A, Policlinico Umberto 1, La Sapienza Università Di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Pantano
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Selcetta, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Perrone
- Anatomical Pathology Operative Research Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Anatomical Pathology, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena De Falco
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, C.So Della Repubblica 79, 04100, Latina, Italy
- Mediterranea Cardiocentro, 80122, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Gian Paolo Spinelli
- UOC Oncologia Territoriale, Polo Pontino, La Sapienza Università Di Roma, Latina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mollman BJ. Colorectal cancer screening: The role of MT-sDNA testing. JAAPA 2023; Published Ahead of Print:01720610-990000000-00065. [PMID: 37399452 DOI: 10.1097/01.jaa.0000944596.08257.61] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Because an estimated 10.5% of new colorectal cancer (CRC) cases occur in patients under age 50 years, the US Preventive Services Task Force in 2021 recommended CRC screening for adults ages 45 to 49 years. The prevalence of up-to-date CRC screening with any recommended test among patients age 45 years and older in the United States is only 59% in 2023, indicating that existing screening practices are ineffective. Screening options now include invasive and noninvasive measures. Multi-target stool DNA (MT-sDNA) testing is a simple, low-risk, noninvasive test that provides excellent sensitivity and specificity, is cost-effective, and may increase patient screening rates. CRC screening guideline recommendations and alternative screening methods may help improve patient outcomes and reduce morbidity and mortality. This article describes MT-sDNA testing, its effectiveness, recommended use, and potential expanding role as a screening option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burton James Mollman
- At the time this article was written, Burton James Mollman practiced in family medicine at Baker Family Medicine in Bismarck, N.D. The author discloses that he is a paid medical advisory board member for Exact Sciences. The author attests that this article is independent of any relationship with Exact Sciences. The author has disclosed no other potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kortlever T, de Klaver W, van der Vlugt M, Meijer G, Dekker E, Bossuyt P. Cross-sectional risk models using quantitative fecal hemoglobin in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2023; 23:1221-1232. [PMID: 37930046 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2023.2279607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) is a central tool in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. To improve the selection of individuals for colonoscopy, risk models combining FIT with additional CRC risk factors have been developed. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the current noninvasive FIT-based risk models for CRC screening to facilitate future implementation. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search for risk models that combined quantitative fecal hemoglobin with clinical data or noninvasive biomarkers and that were intended for CRC screening. Risk of bias was assessed using the PROBAST tool. RESULTS Twenty risk models reported across 29 publications were included. The overall risk of bias was high. In studies that compared risk models to FIT, 11/12 (92%) risk models had a significantly higher c-statistic than FIT only. 16/20 risk models (80%) had not been externally validated and only one model has been implemented so far. CONCLUSION FIT-based risk models have the potential to improve the yield of CRC screening. Unfortunately, all included publications had a high risk of bias and most risk models have not yet been externally validated. The prospect of improved CRC screening with risk models should encourage more rigorous evaluation in existing screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Kortlever
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willemijn de Klaver
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon van der Vlugt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit Meijer
- Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick Bossuyt
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ebner DW, Burger KN, Broderick B, Mahoney DW, Kellogg TA, Acosta A, Kisiel JB. Positive Predictive Value for Multitarget Stool DNA After Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery. GASTRO HEP ADVANCES 2023; 2:902-910. [PMID: 37876832 PMCID: PMC10597571 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastha.2023.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) may adversely affect noninvasive stool tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening through several mechanisms. Multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) is approved for CRC screening; however, performance in post-BMS patients is unknown. As the rates of BMS are anticipated to increase with rising incidence of obesity, it is important to evaluate mt-sDNA test performance among these patients. METHODS In a multisite academic and community-based practice, we obtained mt-sDNA results from 10/2014 to 12/2019 through electronic records and an institutional BMS registry. Average CRC risk patients with BMS prior to a positive mt-sDNA underwent a detailed chart review. Follow-up colonoscopy findings were compared to those among BMS patients screened with colonoscopy alone and a historical cohort of patients without BMS, screened by mt-sDNA. The primary study endpoint was the positive predictive value (PPV) for advanced colorectal neoplasia. RESULTS Among 336 average-risk patients who had mt-sDNA after BMS, mt-sDNA was positive in 49 (14.6%), 47/49 (96%) underwent follow-up colonoscopy, and the PPV for advanced neoplasia was 12/47 (25.5%). This is similar to the PPV for advanced colorectal neoplasia (425/1542, 28%) in a historical cohort of persons without prior BMS, screened by mt-sDNA at our center (P = .86). Among those who had prior BMS, the rate of advanced neoplasia was higher after mt-sDNA compared to screening colonoscopy alone. CONCLUSION Despite anatomic and physiologic mechanisms that could alter blood or DNA content in stool, BMS does not appear to adversely affect the PPV of mt-sDNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek W. Ebner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kelli N. Burger
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Brendan Broderick
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Douglas W. Mahoney
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Todd A. Kellogg
- Division of Endocrine & Metabolic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA Minnesota
| | - Andres Acosta
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John B. Kisiel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Imperiale TF, Lavin PT, Marti TN, Jakubowski D, Itzkowitz SH, May FP, Limburg PJ, Sweetser S, Daghestani A, Berger BM. Three-Year Interval for the Multi-Target Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Longitudinal Study. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2023; 16:89-97. [PMID: 36205504 PMCID: PMC9900315 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-22-0238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Data supporting the clinical utility of multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) at the guideline-recommended 3-year interval have not been reported.Between April 2015 and July 2016, candidates for colorectal cancer screening whose providers prescribed the mt-sDNA test were enrolled. Participants with a positive baseline test were recommended for colonoscopy and completed the study. Those with a negative baseline test were followed annually for 3 years. In year 3, the mt-sDNA test was repeated and colonoscopy was recommended independent of results. Data were analyzed using the Predictive Summary Index (PSI), a measure of the gain in certainty for dichotomous diagnostic tests (where a positive value indicates a net gain), and by comparing observed versus expected colorectal cancers and advanced precancerous lesions.Of 2,404 enrolled subjects, 2,044 (85%) had a valid baseline mt-sDNA result [284 (13.9%) positive and 1,760 (86.1%) negative]. Following participant attrition, the year 3 intention to screen cohort included 591 of 1,760 (33.6%) subjects with valid mt-sDNA and colonoscopy results, with no colorectal cancers and 63 advanced precancerous lesions [22 (34.9%) detected by mt-sDNA] and respective PSI values of 0% (P = 1) and 9.3% (P = 0.01). The observed 3-year colorectal cancer yield was lower than expected (one-sided P = 0.09), while that for advanced precancerous lesions was higher than expected (two-sided P = 0.009).Repeat mt-sDNA screening at a 3-year interval resulted in a statistically significant gain in detection of advanced precancerous lesions. Due to absence of year 3 colorectal cancers, the PSI estimate for colorectal cancer was underpowered and could not be reliably quantified. Larger studies are required to assess the colorectal cancer study findings. PREVENTION RELEVANCE Understanding the 3-year yield of mt-sDNA for colorectal cancer and advanced precancerous polyps is required to ensure the clinical appropriateness of the 3-year interval and to optimize mt-sDNA's screening effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F. Imperiale
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.,The Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN.,Corresponding Author: Thomas F. Imperiale, Indiana University Medical Center, Regenstrief Institute, Inc. 1101 West 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202-2859, Phone: 317-274-9046; E-mail:
| | - Philip T. Lavin
- Boston Biostatistics Research Foundation, Framingham, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Folasade P. May
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases and UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gao HL, Lv LB, Zhao WF, Lu QW, Fan JQ. Diagnostic accuracy of the multi-target stool DNA test in detecting colorectal cancer: A hospital-based study. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 15:102-111. [PMID: 36684047 PMCID: PMC9850761 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i1.102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Revised: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The multi-target stool DNA test (MT-sDNA) has potential utility in the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC), but validation of its clinical accuracy has been limited in China.
AIM To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MT-sDNA and investigate the combined diagnostic value of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) with MT-sDNA in CRC and adenomas.
METHODS We evaluated the performance of the MT-sDNA kit based on a hospital clinical trial. In this case-control study, 135 participants from the Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Ningbo University, including 51 CRC patients, 23 patients with adenomas, and 61 healthy controls were enrolled. We used a risk scoring system to determine the positivity of tests with histological diagnosis or colonoscopy as the reference standard.
RESULTS The main indices of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity for CRC detection were 90.2% and 83.3%, respectively, with an accuracy of 89.8%. For adenoma, the sensitivity and specificity were 56.5% and 68.9%, respectively, with an accuracy of 73.1%. The sensitivity and specificity of MT-sDNA combined with CEA in the diagnosis of adenoma were 78.3% and 60.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSION The MT-sDNA test showed better performance in the detection of CRC, which was superior to AFP, CEA, and CA199 separately, but not for predicting adenomas. The combination of MT-sDNA with CEA further improved the sensitivity for adenoma diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han-Lu Gao
- Department of Preventive Health, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Le-Bin Lv
- Department of Preventive Health, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Wang-Fang Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo 315000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Qi-Wen Lu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo 315000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jin-Qing Fan
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo 315000, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Toledo DEFWM, Breekveldt ECH, IJspeert JEG, van Vuuren AJ, van Kemenade FJ, Ramakers C, Nagtegaal ID, van Leerdam ME, Spaander MCW, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Toes-Zoutendijk E, Dekker E. Advanced serrated polyps as a target of screening: detection rate and positive predictive value within a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening population. Endoscopy 2023; 55:526-534. [PMID: 36323332 DOI: 10.1055/a-1971-3488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Advanced serrated polyps (ASPs) have a comparable risk to advanced adenomas for progression to colorectal cancer (CRC). The yield of most CRC screening programs, however, is based on advanced adenomas and CRC only. We assessed the ASP detection rate, and positive predictive value (PPV) including ASPs in a fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening program. METHODS : We analyzed the findings of follow-up colonoscopies of FIT-positive screenees in the Dutch CRC screening program from 2014 until 2020. Data were retrieved from the national screening and pathology database. An ASP was defined as any serrated polyp of ≥ 10 mm, sessile serrated lesion with dysplasia, or traditional serrated adenoma. The ASP detection rate was defined as the proportion of colonoscopies with ≥ 1 ASP. PPV was originally defined as the proportion of individuals with a CRC or advanced adenoma. The updated PPV definition included CRCs, advanced adenomas, and/or ASPs. RESULTS : 322 882 colonoscopies were included in the analyses. The overall detection rate of ASPs was 5.9 %. ASPs were detected more often in women than men (6.3 % vs. 5.6 %; P < 0.001). ASP detection rates in individuals aged 55-59, 60-64, 65-69, and 70 + were 5.2 %, 6.1 %, 6.1 %, and 5.9 %, respectively (P < 0.001). The PPV for CRCs and advanced adenomas was 41.1 % and increased to 43.8 % when including ASPs. The PPV increase was larger in women than in men (3.2 vs. 2.4 percentage points). CONCLUSIONS : 5.9 % of FIT-positive screenees had ASPs, but half of these were detected in combination with a CRC or advanced adenoma. Therefore, including ASPs results in a small increase in the yield of FIT-based screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E F W M van Toledo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emilie C H Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Joep E G IJspeert
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Folkert J van Kemenade
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Ramakers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nash SH, Zimpelman GL, Miller KN, Clark JH, Britton CL. The Alaska Native Tumour Registry: fifty years of cancer surveillance data for Alaska Native people. Int J Circumpolar Health 2022; 81:2013403. [PMID: 34918619 PMCID: PMC8725679 DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2021.2013403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Like other Indigenous Circumpolar populations, Alaska Native (AN) people experience different patterns of cancer than their non-Indigenous counterparts. Every 5 years, the Alaska Native Tumour Registry releases a comprehensive report on cancer among AN people; this study provides 50 years of cancer surveillance data. Five-year annual-average age-adjusted incidence rates were calculated for time-periods ranging 1969-2018. AN data were compared with data for US whites (SEER 9). Mortality rates were calculated for 1994-2018 using data from the National Center for Health Statistics. During 2014-2018, there were 2,401 cases of invasive cancer among AN people. Among these, the most commonly diagnosed cancers were colorectal (405 cases, 17% of all cancers), lung and bronchus (373 cases, 16% of all cancers), and female breast (340 cases, 14% of all cancers). Lung cancer was the leading cause of cancer death, followed by colorectal and female breast cancers. These leading cancers are screenable, and preventable through lifestyle modifications including tobacco cessation, healthy eating and engaging in physical activity. These data provide important information to support cancer prevention and control among AN people. Cancer surveillance has been a valuable tool throughout the Circumpolar North to support reducing the burden of cancer among Indigenous populations.Abbreviations: ANAI: Alaska Native/American Indian; AN: Alaska Native; USW: U.S. White(s); ANMC: Alaska Native Medical Center; ANTR: Alaska Native Tumour Registry; IR: Incidence Rate; CI: Confidence Interval; RR: Rate Ratio; ICD-O-3: International Classification of Diseases for Oncology - Third Edition; SEER: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah H Nash
- Alaska Native Epidemiology Center, Community Health Services, Anchorage, AK, USA
| | - Garrett L Zimpelman
- Alaska Native Epidemiology Center, Community Health Services, Anchorage, AK, USA
| | - Keri N Miller
- Alaska Native Epidemiology Center, Community Health Services, Anchorage, AK, USA
| | - James H Clark
- Alaska Native Epidemiology Center, Community Health Services, Anchorage, AK, USA
| | - Carla L Britton
- Alaska Native Epidemiology Center, Community Health Services, Anchorage, AK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Flanagan CA, Finney Rutten LJ, Kisiel JB, Lent JK, Bachtold JF, Swartz AW, Redwood DG. Development of a colorectal cancer screening intervention for Alaska Native people during a pandemic year. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2022; 30:101016. [PMID: 36276262 PMCID: PMC9579295 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.101016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Alaska Native (AN) people experience twice the rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) as US Whites. There is a need for increased screening and early detection. We describe the development and implementation of a randomized controlled trial of the multi-target stool DNA test (mt-sDNA; Cologuard® Exact Sciences, Madison WI) to increase CRC screening among AN people. Methods A total of 32 rural/remote AN communities were randomized to a varied intensity intervention (patient navigation vs mailed health education) compared to 14 communities receiving usual opportunistic care. Outcome measures include screening completion and method used (mt-sDNA vs colonoscopy). Health care provider interviews and AN patient focus groups will be used to assess patient-, provider-, and system-level CRC screening promoters and barriers. Results The study began in April 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in a number of challenges and study adaptations. These included difficulty finding laboratory space, lack of timely mail service due to flight reductions across the state, and travel restrictions that led to postponement of in-person focus groups. Videoconferencing platforms for Tribal engagement replaced face-to-face interactions. After an extensive search, a laboratory with space available was identified and the preprocessing laboratory established. Study staff will work closely with patients to monitor mail service to get mt-sDNA kits sent on time. We are also exploring the use of videoconferencing platforms as alternatives to in-person focus groups. Conclusions Despite the challenges encountered during the COVID-19 pandemic, we successfully initiated the intervention and established the first mt-sDNA preprocessing laboratory in Alaska.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christie A. Flanagan
- Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, United States,Corresponding author. 3900 Ambassador Dr., Ste. 201, Anchorage, AK, 99508, United States.
| | | | - John B. Kisiel
- Mayo Clinic Gastroenterology and Hepatology, United States
| | | | | | - Andrew W. Swartz
- Departments of Emergency Medicine, Family Medicine, and Surgery, Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bayo Calero J, Castaño López MA, Casado Monge PG, Díaz Portillo J, Bejarano García A, Navarro Roldán F. Analysis of blood markers for early colorectal cancer diagnosis. J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 13:2259-2268. [PMID: 36388660 PMCID: PMC9660082 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-21-747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a very common tumor worldwide. Its mortality can be limited by early diagnosis through screening programs. These programs are based on fecal occult blood testing and colonoscopy. Our objective was to find a model based on the determination of blood biomarkers that was efficacious enough to become part of the early diagnosis of CRC. METHODS In a total of 221 patients who underwent a colonoscopy, two types of markers were identified (I) classic: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA19.9, α-fetoprotein, CA125, CA72.4, and ferritin; and (II) experimental: neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), estimated glomerular filtration rate (EGFR), 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8OHdG), calprotectin, and cysteine-rich 61 (Cyr61). We divided the patients into four groups according to colonoscopy results: a control group (n=83) with normal colonoscopy, a polyp group (n=56), a CRC group (n=45), and an inflammatory disease group (n=37). We built an algorithm based on multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 51.6% were males, and the median age was 63 years. We designed an algorithm based on the combination of several markers that discriminated CRC patients from the rest of the patients with a performance of 94%, a sensitivity of 95.6%, and a specificity of 80.6%. Discriminating by sex also resulted in two powerful algorithms, although it performed better in males (97% vs. 91%). CONCLUSIONS Our study has devised a predictive model with high efficacy based on the determination of several biomarkers. We think that it could be incorporated into the set of methods used in CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Bayo Calero
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital “Juan Ramón Jiménez”, Huelva, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Francisco Navarro Roldán
- Department of Integrated Sciences, Cell Biology, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tivey A, Church M, Rothwell D, Dive C, Cook N. Circulating tumour DNA - looking beyond the blood. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022; 19:600-612. [PMID: 35915225 PMCID: PMC9341152 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00660-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decade, various liquid biopsy techniques have emerged as viable alternatives to the analysis of traditional tissue biopsy samples. Such surrogate 'biopsies' offer numerous advantages, including the relative ease of obtaining serial samples and overcoming the issues of interpreting one or more small tissue samples that might not reflect the entire tumour burden. To date, the majority of research in the area of liquid biopsies has focused on blood-based biomarkers, predominantly using plasma-derived circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). However, ctDNA can also be obtained from various non-blood sources and these might offer unique advantages over plasma ctDNA. In this Review, we discuss advances in the analysis of ctDNA from non-blood sources, focusing on urine, cerebrospinal fluid, and pleural or peritoneal fluid, but also consider other sources of ctDNA. We discuss how these alternative sources can have a distinct yet complementary role to that of blood ctDNA analysis and consider various technical aspects of non-blood ctDNA assay development. We also reflect on the settings in which non-blood ctDNA can offer distinct advantages over plasma ctDNA and explore some of the challenges associated with translating these alternative assays from academia into clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Tivey
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Matt Church
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Dominic Rothwell
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute Cancer Biomarker Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Caroline Dive
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute Cancer Biomarker Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Natalie Cook
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Krigel A, Wan DW. Colonoscopy after a Positive Stool-based Test for Colon Cancer Screening: Moving Toward a Better Understanding of What to Expect. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2022; 15:417-418. [PMID: 35788831 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-22-0213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Stool-based tests for colorectal cancer, including fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and multitarget stool DNA testing (mt-sDNA), are among the recommended first-line screening options for patients at average risk for colorectal cancer and offer advantages over colonoscopy. However, stool-based tests have high false-positive rates, and the expected yield of colonoscopy after positive FIT compared with positive mt-sDNA is not well studied. As discussed in this issue of Cancer Prevention Research, the presence of a precancerous lesion in the majority of cases with either positive stool-based test is expected. In addition, a positive mt-sDNA is associated with a higher risk for finding any neoplasia on colonoscopy compared with positive FIT, and particularly associated with higher prevalence of clinically relevant serrated polyps compared with positive FIT. Further research is needed on what to expect from positive stool-based testing on average risk 45-49 years old patients, the newest cohort indicated for colorectal cancer screening. See related article, p. 455.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Krigel
- Division of Digestive and Liver Disease, Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - David W Wan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Anand S, Liang PS. A Practical Overview of the Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2022; 13:e00464. [PMID: 35383606 PMCID: PMC9038502 DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The multitarget stool DNA test with fecal immunochemical test (sDNA-FIT) is recommended by all major US guidelines as an option for colorectal cancer screening. It is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in average-risk individuals aged 45 years and older. The sDNA-FIT tests for 11 biomarkers, including point mutations in KRAS, aberrant methylation in NDRG4 and BMP3, and human hemoglobin. Patients collect a stool sample at home, send it to the manufacturer's laboratory within 1 day, and the result is reported in approximately 2 weeks. Compared with FIT, sDNA-FIT has higher sensitivity but lower specificity for colorectal cancer, which translates to a higher false-positive rate. A unique feature of sDNA-FIT is the manufacturer's comprehensive patient navigation system, which operates 24 hours a day and provides active outreach for patient education and reminders in the first month after a test is ordered. Retesting is recommended every 1-3 years, although the optimal testing interval has not yet been determined empirically. The cost of sDNA-FIT is $681 without insurance, but Medicare and most private insurers cover it with no copay or deductible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanya Anand
- SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Peter S. Liang
- NYU Langone Health, VA New York Harbor Health Care System, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Burke CA, Lieberman D, Feuerstein JD. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Approach to the Use of Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening Options: Commentary. Gastroenterology 2022; 162:952-956. [PMID: 35094786 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.09.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Clinical Practice Update Commentary is to review the available evidence and provide expert advice regarding the approach to using noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening options, including evidence for their effectiveness, selection of individuals for whom these tests are appropriate, implications of a positive non-colonoscopy screening test, and opportunities to enhance the quality of noninvasive CRC screening programs. This Clinical Practice Update was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology. This expert commentary reflects recently published studies in this field, as well as the experiences of the authors who are gastroenterologists with high-level expertise in CRC screening and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joseph D Feuerstein
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dolatkhah R, Dastgiri S, Jafarabadi MA, Abdolahi HM, Somi MH. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2022; 45:753-766. [PMID: 35101601 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2022.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to collect and summarize test data and conduct a meta-analysis, with respect to the Multitarget Stool DNA test sensitivity and specificity, compared to colonoscopy. All manuscripts were screened for eligibility according to inclusion criteria. Participants were a normal population at an average risk of developing CRC. Intervention was Stool based and DNA panel tests compared with colonoscopy, and outcome was detection of CRC and any pre-cancerous lesions. Inter-study and inconsistency (using the I-squared test) were assessed. Meta-analyses of the Mt-sDNA test showed a combined sensitivity of 89%, 51%, and 76% for the detection of CRC, advanced adenoma (AA), and combined CRC and AA, respectively. The overall specificity was 91%, 89%, and 90% for the detection of CRC, AA, and combined CRC and AA, respectively. Mt-sDNA had significantly acceptable diagnostic accuracy for CRC and AA diagnosis, but still has lower sensitivity and specificity than colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roya Dolatkhah
- Hematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| | - Saeed Dastgiri
- Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi
- Cabrini Research, Cabrini Health, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Australia; Road and Traffic Injury Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Hossein Mashhadi Abdolahi
- Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Hossein Somi
- Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ebner DW, Eckmann JD, Burger KN, Mahoney DW, Whitaker TJ, Petersen IA, Kisiel JB. High Positive Predictive Value of Multitarget Stool DNA After Aerodigestive Tract Radiotherapy. GASTRO HEP ADVANCES 2022; 1:746-754. [PMID: 36117548 PMCID: PMC9481191 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastha.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) is approved for average-risk colorectal cancer screening; test performance in persons with prior radiation therapy (RT) has not been studied. RT can induce gastrointestinal bleeding and alter DNA methylation, which may affect mt-sDNA accuracy. Among patients previously treated with RT, we aimed to measure the positive predictive value (PPV) of mt-sDNA and compare these results to historical estimates of mt-sDNA PPV among average-risk patients. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of a multisite academic and community-based practice. Patients with RT and subsequent mt-sDNA use during the study period (2014–2016) were identified. The findings at diagnostic colonoscopy were compared with published reports among average-risk patients. Nominal P values were generated by 2-tailed Fisher’s exact testing in comparisons of colorectal neoplasia (CRN) rates between groups. RESULTS: There were 220 patients who had RT before mt-sDNA testing. RT was delivered along the aerodigestive tract in 108 patients. Mt-sDNA tests were positive in 45 of 220 patients (20%), and colonoscopy findings were available for 42; 31 of 42 patients (74%) had CRN. PPV by mt-sDNA was similar when stratified by site of prior RT (along vs outside the aerodigestive tract; P = 1.00). Detection of advanced CRN (36%) was nominally higher than previously published retrospective (27%) and prospective (20%) studies. The median time from the start of RT to mt-sDNA use was 7 (interquartile range, 3–14) years. CONCLUSION: With a test positivity rate and PPV for CRN similar to reports among average-risk patients, prior RT does not appear to adversely affect mt-sDNA performance.
Collapse
|
20
|
Li N, Lu B, Luo C, Cai J, Lu M, Zhang Y, Chen H, Dai M. Incidence, mortality, survival, risk factor and screening of colorectal cancer: A comparison among China, Europe, and northern America. Cancer Lett 2021; 522:255-268. [PMID: 34563640 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.09.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. China, Europe and northern America account for more than half of the new CRC cases and associated deaths globally. This review summarizes the current status and temporal trends of CRC in China, Europe, and northern America. The potential primary preventive strategies and latest advances in CRC screening techniques and programs are discussed. Recently, the incidence and mortality of CRC in some European and northern American countries have decreased; conversely, CRC incidence and mortality continue to increase in China. The overall 5-year relative survival rate for CRC is similar between these regions, but there is considerable heterogeneity among European countries. Implementing population-based CRC screening programs can effectively address the growing disease burden. The effectiveness of nationwide CRC screening programs in these regions has been limited by relatively low coverage and participation rate. The deployment of state-of-the-art techniques and precise risk-adapted screening strategies incorporating effective risk prediction models and screening techniques may boost screening effectiveness. Our review provides novel foundations for the development and optimization of CRC preventive strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Li
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410006, China
| | - Bin Lu
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Chenyu Luo
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jie Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Ming Lu
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yuhan Zhang
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Hongda Chen
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Min Dai
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zou J, Xiao Z, Wu Y, Yang J, Cui N. Noninvasive fecal testing for colorectal cancer. Clin Chim Acta 2021; 524:123-131. [PMID: 34756863 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.10.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy worldwide, with the second highest mortality rate among all malignancies. In this review, we describe the current utility of stool diagnostic biomarkers for CRC. METHODS We reviewed stool-related tests and biomarker candidates for the diagnosis of CRC. The guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT), fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and multitarget stool DNA test (MT-sDNA) have been used as clinical CRC screening tools. Although microRNAs, protein biomarkers, and microbiota have not yet been used in clinical CRC screening, there is growing evidence that they have the potential to function as CRC screening tools. RESULTS According to the literature, the sensitivity of MT-sDNA for detecting CRC was 87.0-100%, 32.7-82.0% for advanced adenomas, and the specificity was 86.1-95.2%. The sensitivity of individual biomarkers of fecal microRNAs for detecting CRC was 34.2-88.2%, 73.0% for advanced adenomas, and the specificity was 68-100%. The sensitivity of fecal protein markers for detecting CRC was 63.6-93.0%, 47.7-69.4% for advanced adenomas, and the specificity was 38.3-97.5%. The sensitivity of fecal microbiota for detecting CRC was 54.0-100.0%, 32.0-48.3% for advanced adenomas, and the specificity was 61.3-90.0%. CONCLUSION MT-sDNA is the most sensitive CRC screening test, and its sensitivity is the highest for advanced adenomas; however, its detection cost is high. MT-sDNA was more sensitive to CRC and advanced precancerous lesions than FIT, but compared to three years of MT-sDNA, annual FIT as the first non-invasive screening test for CRC seemed to be more effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianhua Zou
- China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhanshuo Xiao
- China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guanganmen Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Wu
- China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Jingyan Yang
- China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Cui
- China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yang JD, Ghoz H, Aboelsoud MM, Taylor WR, Yab TC, Berger CK, Cao X, Foote PH, Giama NH, Barr Fritcher EG, Mahoney DW, Moser CD, Smyrk TC, Kipp BR, Gores GJ, Roberts LR, Kisiel JB. DNA Methylation Markers for Detection of Cholangiocarcinoma: Discovery, Validation, and Clinical Testing in Biliary Brushings and Plasma. Hepatol Commun 2021; 5:1448-1459. [PMID: 34430788 PMCID: PMC8369938 DOI: 10.1002/hep4.1730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has poor prognosis due to late-stage, symptomatic presentation. Altered DNA methylation markers may improve diagnosis of CCA. Reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from frozen CCA tissues and matched to adjacent benign biliary epithelia or liver parenchyma. Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) identified from sequenced differentially methylated regions were selected for biological validation on DNA from independent formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded CCA tumors and adjacent hepatobiliary control tissues using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. Selected MDMs were then blindly assayed on DNA extracted from independent archival biliary brushing specimens, including 12 perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, 4 distal cholangiocarcinoma cases, and 18 controls. Next, MDMs were blindly assayed on plasma DNA from patients with extrahepatic CCA (eCCA), including 54 perihilar CCA and 5 distal CCA cases and 95 healthy and 22 primary sclerosing cholangitis controls, balanced for age and sex. From more than 3,600 MDMs discovered in frozen tissues, 39 were tested in independent samples. In the clinical pilot of 16 MDMs on cytology brushings, methylated EMX1 (empty spiracles homeobox 1) had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.0). In the clinical pilot on plasma, a cross-validated recursive partitioning tree prediction model from nine MDMs was accurate for de novo eCCA (AUC, 0.88 [0.81-0.95]) but not for primary sclerosing cholangitis-associated eCCA (AUC, 0.54 [0.35-0.73]). Conclusion: Next-generation DNA sequencing yielded highly discriminant methylation markers for CCA. Confirmation of these findings in independent tissues, cytology brushings, and plasma supports further development of DNA methylation to augment diagnosis of CCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ju Dong Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Hassan Ghoz
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMayo ClinicJacksonvilleFLUSA
| | | | - William R. Taylor
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Tracy C. Yab
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Calise K. Berger
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Xiaoming Cao
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Patrick H. Foote
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Nasra H. Giama
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | | | - Douglas W. Mahoney
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and InformaticsMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Catherine D. Moser
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineChildren’s Healthcare of AtlantaAtlantaGAUSA
| | | | | | - Gregory J. Gores
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Lewis R. Roberts
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - John B. Kisiel
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Alkhizzi B, Khan MI, Al-Ghafari A, Choudhry H. Upregulation of circular and linear METTL3 and USP3 in colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett 2021; 22:675. [PMID: 34345300 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2021.12936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Several screening methods are currently used to detect colorectal cancer (CRC). However, these are either under-utilized due to their invasive nature or are limited in terms of their diagnostic ability. Numerous reports have investigated messenger and circular RNA as non-invasive biomarkers, but the majority of gene expression studies using RT-qPCR involve critical errors that often lead to irreproducible findings. In the present study, several of these issues were addressed. To the best of our knowledge, this study reports for the first time the upregulation of both the circular and the linear isoform of USP3 and METTL3 in leukocytes from patients with CRC. The linear transcripts of USP3 and METTL3 exhibited 2.3- and 2-fold increases on average in CRC samples (n=42 CRC) compared with the respective healthy controls (n=32), whereas their circular isoforms showed 1.6- and 1.7-fold increases, respectively. Moreover, a strong positive correlation was observed between the circular and linear isoforms of USP3 in the CRC cohort (P<0.0001), but not in the control group (P>0.05). In addition, the linear USP3 assay had excellent sensitivity (79%), specificity (75%), positive predictive value (81%), negative predictive value (73%) and area under the curve (AUC, 0.8534; P-value <0.0001). The circular (AUC, 0.6946; P-value =0.0043) and linear (AUC, 0.7202; P-value =0.0012) METTL3 assays also showed potential; however, this was not the case for the circular USP3 assay (P-value >0.05). Taken together, this stringent RT-qPCR approach provides evidence for the viability of using circular and linear RNA molecules as disease biomarkers and may help shed light on the regulatory pathways of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bilal Alkhizzi
- Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammad Imran Khan
- Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.,Center for Artificial Intelligence in Precision Medicines, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ayat Al-Ghafari
- Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.,Scientific Research Center, Dar Al-Hekma University, Jeddah 22246, Saudi Arabia.,Cancer and Mutagenesis Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Centre, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hani Choudhry
- Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.,Center for Artificial Intelligence in Precision Medicines, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kong C, Fu T. Value of methylation markers in colorectal cancer (Review). Oncol Rep 2021; 46:177. [PMID: 34212989 DOI: 10.3892/or.2021.8128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a multifactorial and multistage process that occurs due to both genetic and epigenetic variations in normal epithelial cells. Analysis of the CRC epigenome has revealed that almost all CRC types have a large number of abnormally methylated genes. Hypermethylation of cell‑free DNA from CRC in the blood or stool is considered as a potential non‑invasive cancer biomarker, and various methylation markers have shown high sensitivity and specificity. The aim of the present review was to examine potential methylation markers in CRC that have been used or are expected to be used in the clinical setting, focusing on their screening, predictive, prognostic and therapeutic roles in CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Can Kong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery II, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, P.R. China
| | - Tao Fu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery II, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ebner DW, Eckmann JD, Burger KN, Mahoney DW, Bering J, Kahn A, Rodriguez EA, Prichard DO, Wallace MB, Kane SV, Finney Rutten LJ, Gurudu SR, Kisiel JB. Detection of Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Neoplasia by Multi-target Stool DNA. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2021; 12:e00375. [PMID: 34140458 PMCID: PMC8216679 DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Significant variability between colonoscopy operators contributes to postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers (CRCs). We aimed to estimate postcolonoscopy colorectal neoplasia (CRN) detection by multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA), which has not previously been studied for this purpose. METHODS In a retrospective cohort of patients with +mt-sDNA and completed follow-up colonoscopy, positive predictive value (PPV) for endpoints of any CRN, advanced adenoma, right-sided neoplasia, sessile serrated polyps (SSP), and CRC were stratified by the time since previous colonoscopy (0-9, 10, and ≥11 years). mt-sDNA PPV at ≤9 years from previous average-risk screening colonoscopy was used to estimate CRN missed at previous screening colonoscopy. RESULTS Among the 850 studied patients with +mt-sDNA after a previous negative screening colonoscopy, any CRN was found in 535 (PPV 63%). Among 107 average-risk patients having +mt-sDNA ≤9 years after last negative colonoscopy, any CRN was found in 67 (PPV 63%), advanced neoplasia in 16 (PPV 15%), right-sided CRN in 48 (PPV 46%), and SSP in 20 (PPV 19%). These rates were similar to those in 47 additional average risk persons with previous incomplete colonoscopy and in an additional 68 persons at increased CRC risk. One CRC (stage I) was found in an average risk patient who was mt-sDNA positive 6 years after negative screening colonoscopy. DISCUSSION The high PPV of mt-sDNA 0-9 years after a negative screening colonoscopy suggests that lesions were likely missed on previous examination or may have arisen de novo. mt-sDNA as an interval test after negative screening colonoscopy warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek W. Ebner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jason D. Eckmann
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kelli N. Burger
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Douglas W. Mahoney
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jamie Bering
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Allon Kahn
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Eduardo A. Rodriguez
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - David O. Prichard
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Michael B. Wallace
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Sunanda V. Kane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Suryakanth R. Gurudu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - John B. Kisiel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lin JS, Perdue LA, Henrikson NB, Bean SI, Blasi PR. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2021; 325:1978-1998. [PMID: 34003220 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.4417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 241] [Impact Index Per Article: 80.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the US. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the effectiveness, test accuracy, and harms of screening for CRC to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant studies published from January 1, 2015, to December 4, 2019; surveillance through March 26, 2021. STUDY SELECTION English-language studies conducted in asymptomatic populations at general risk of CRC. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two reviewers independently appraised the articles and extracted relevant study data from fair- or good-quality studies. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, test accuracy in detecting cancers or adenomas, and serious adverse events. RESULTS The review included 33 studies (n = 10 776 276) on the effectiveness of screening, 59 (n = 3 491 045) on the test performance of screening tests, and 131 (n = 26 987 366) on the harms of screening. In randomized clinical trials (4 trials, n = 458 002), intention to screen with 1- or 2-time flexible sigmoidoscopy vs no screening was associated with a decrease in CRC-specific mortality (incidence rate ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.68-0.80]). Annual or biennial guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) vs no screening (5 trials, n = 419 966) was associated with a reduction of CRC-specific mortality after 2 to 9 rounds of screening (relative risk at 19.5 years, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.84-0.98]; relative risk at 30 years, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.65-0.93]). In observational studies, receipt of screening colonoscopy (2 studies, n = 436 927) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) (1 study, n = 5.4 million) vs no screening was associated with lower risk of CRC incidence or mortality. Nine studies (n = 6497) evaluated the test accuracy of screening computed tomography (CT) colonography, 4 of which also reported the test accuracy of colonoscopy; pooled sensitivity to detect adenomas 6 mm or larger was similar between CT colonography with bowel prep (0.86) and colonoscopy (0.89). In pooled values, commonly evaluated FITs (14 studies, n = 45 403) (sensitivity, 0.74; specificity, 0.94) and stool DNA with FIT (4 studies, n = 12 424) (sensitivity, 0.93; specificity, 0.85) performed better than high-sensitivity gFOBT (2 studies, n = 3503) (sensitivity, 0.50-0.75; specificity, 0.96-0.98) to detect cancers. Serious harms of screening colonoscopy included perforations (3.1/10 000 procedures) and major bleeding (14.6/10 000 procedures). CT colonography may have harms resulting from low-dose ionizing radiation. It is unclear if detection of extracolonic findings on CT colonography is a net benefit or harm. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE There are several options to screen for colorectal cancer, each with a different level of evidence demonstrating its ability to reduce cancer mortality, its ability to detect cancer or precursor lesions, and its risk of harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S Lin
- Kaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Leslie A Perdue
- Kaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Nora B Henrikson
- Kaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Sarah I Bean
- Kaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Paula R Blasi
- Kaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Redwood DG, Dinh TA, Kisiel JB, Borah BJ, Moriarty JP, Provost EM, Sacco FD, Tiesinga JJ, Ahlquist DA. Cost-Effectiveness of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing vs Colonoscopy or Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Alaska Native People. Mayo Clin Proc 2021; 96:1203-1217. [PMID: 33840520 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.07.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the cost-effectiveness of multitarget stool DNA testing (MT-sDNA) compared with colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for Alaska Native adults. PATIENTS AND METHODS A Markov model was used to evaluate the 3 screening test effects over 40 years. Outcomes included colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality, costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The study incorporated updated evidence on screening test performance and adherence and was conducted from December 15, 2016, through November 6, 2019. RESULTS With perfect adherence, CRC incidence was reduced by 52% (95% CI, 46% to 56%) using colonoscopy, 61% (95% CI, 57% to 64%) using annual FIT, and 66% (95% CI, 63% to 68%) using MT-sDNA. Compared with no screening, perfect adherence screening extends life by 0.15, 0.17, and 0.19 QALYs per person with colonoscopy, FIT, and MT-sDNA, respectively. Colonoscopy is the most expensive strategy: approximately $110 million more than MT-sDNA and $127 million more than FIT. With imperfect adherence (best case), MT-sDNA resulted in 0.12 QALYs per person vs 0.05 and 0.06 QALYs per person by FIT and colonoscopy, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses supported the base-case analysis. Under varied adherence scenarios, MT-sDNA either dominates or is cost-effective (ICERs, $1740-$75,868 per QALY saved) compared with FIT and colonoscopy. CONCLUSION Each strategy reduced costs and increased QALYs compared with no screening. Screening by MT-sDNA results in the largest QALY savings. In Markov model analysis, screening by MT-sDNA in the Alaska Native population was cost-effective compared with screening by colonoscopy and FIT for a wide range of adherence scenarios.
Collapse
|
28
|
PPV and Detection Rate of mt-sDNA Testing, FIT, and CT Colonography for Advanced Neoplasia: A Hierarchic Bayesian Meta-Analysis of the Noninvasive Colorectal Screening Tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 217:817-830. [PMID: 33703913 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.25416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Noninvasive tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and prevention limit the need for invasive colonoscopy to follow up positive test results. However, the relative performance characteristics of available noninvasive tests have not yet been adequately compared. OBJECTIVE. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of the available noninvasive CRC screening tests, including multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) testing, fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), and CT colonography (CTC), with an emphasis on comparison of PPV and detection rate (DR) for advanced neoplasia (AN; encompassing cases of advanced adenomas and CRC). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION. After systematic searches of MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases, 10 mt-sDNA, 27 CTC, and 88 FIT published screening studies involving 25,132, 33,493, and 2,355,958 asymptomatic adults, respectively, were included. Meta-analysis with hierarchic Bayesian modeling was conducted in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration and PRISMA guidelines to determine test positivity rates (TPRs) leading to optical colonoscopy, as well as PPVs and DRs for both AN and CRC. Different positivity thresholds were considered for FIT and CTC. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS. Point estimates (with 95% credible intervals) from pooled Bayesian meta-analysis combining all thresholds for FIT and stratifying CTC results by a polyp size threshold of 6 mm or larger (CTC6) and 10 mm or larger (CTC10) were calculated. TPR was 13.5% (10.9-16.6%) for mt-sDNA testing, 6.4% (5.8-7.2%) for FIT, 13.4% (11.4-15.6%) for CTC6, and 6.6% (5.2-7.7%) for CTC10. AN PPV was 26.9% (95% credible interval, 21.8-33.2%) for mt-sDNA testing, 31.8% (29.3-34.5%) for FIT, 34.4% (27.2-41.0%) for CTC6, and 61.0% (54.0-70.0%) for CTC10. CRC PPV was 2.4% (1.5-3.9%) for mt-sDNA testing, 4.9% (4.3-5.3%) for FIT, 3.5% (2.5-4.8%) for CTC6, and 6.0% (4.3-8.0%) for CTC10. The DR for AN was 3.4% (95% credible interval, 2.5-4.8%) for mt-SDNA, 2.0% (1.8-2.3%) for FIT, 4.8% (4.0-6.5%) for CTC6, and 4.0% (3.0-4.6%) for CTC10. When FIT is restricted to a lower threshold (< 10 μg Hb/g feces), its performance profile is similar to that of mt-sDNA testing, although available data are limited. AN PPV odds ratios (relative to CTC10 as the reference) were 0.24 (95% credible interval, 0.17-0.33) for mt-sDNA testing, 0.30 (0.24-0.45) for FIT, and 0.33 (0.25-0.47) for CTC6. CONCLUSION. Among noninvasive CRC screening tests, CTC with a polyp size threshold of 10 mm or larger most effectively targets AN, preserving detection while also decreasing unnecessary colonoscopies compared with mt-sDNA testing and FIT. CLINICAL IMPACT. CTC performed with a polyp size threshold for colonoscopy referral set at 10 mm or larger represents the most effective and efficient noninvasive screening test for CRC prevention and detection.
Collapse
|
29
|
Wang DY, He KX, Huang Y, Lou QQ, He T, Xu X. A New Method for the Detection of Colorectal Cancer and the Precancerous Lesions: Occult Blood Testing Combination with Promoter Methylation in the Fecal Sample. J Cancer 2021; 12:335-342. [PMID: 33391430 PMCID: PMC7738999 DOI: 10.7150/jca.50525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Noninvasive stool-based DNA methylation testing emerges as a new approach for detecting colorectal cancer (CRC). However, its feasibility for early detection of CRC and precancerous lesions in the Chinese population remains inconclusive. Methods: In this study, we establish a possibilities screening method (sDNA-FOBT) for detecting CRC and precancerous lesions (hyperplastic polyps [HP] and adenomas [AD]) and evaluate its detection performance in the Chinese population. This method combined a molecular assay of DNA methylation markers (BMP3, NDRG4, and SDC2) with the human hemoglobin test (FOBT) in stool samples. Results: The sensitivity of sDNA-FOBT was 85.42% for CRC, 85.71% for AD, and 28.21% for HP, respectively, at the specificity of 92%. The diagnostic efficacy of sDNA-FOBT for detecting CRC and precancerous lesions was significantly higher than FOBT alone (sensitivity: 61.70% vs. 51.06%, P<0.01; AUC: 0.78 vs. 0.72, P<0.001), especially for CRC (AUC: 0.91 vs. 0.86, P<0.001) and AD (AUC: 0.91 vs. 0.75, P<0.05). No significant difference was observed between the detection sensitivity of sDNA-FOBT and the clinical variables. Notably, compared with FOBT, sDNA-FOBT was more effective in the detection of CRC and precancerous lesions in the patients aged >50 y (62.34% vs 54.55%, P<0.05). Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that sDNA-FOBT is a promising method for screening CRC and precancerous lesions in the Chinese population. Further studies are required to validate the results in a larger sample capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan-Yang Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Kang-Xin He
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qin-Qin Lou
- Hangzhou Youke Biomedical Inc., Hangzhou, China
| | - Ti He
- Shanghai Genechem Clinical Laboratory Inc., Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ballester V, Taylor WR, Slettedahl SW, Mahoney DW, Yab TC, Sinicrope FA, Boland CR, Lidgard GP, Cruz-Correa MR, Smyrk TC, Boardman LA, Ahlquist DA, Kisiel JB. Novel methylated DNA markers accurately discriminate Lynch syndrome associated colorectal neoplasia. Epigenomics 2020; 12:2173-2187. [PMID: 33350853 PMCID: PMC7923255 DOI: 10.2217/epi-2020-0132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: Acquired molecular changes in Lynch syndrome (LS) colorectal tumors have been largely unstudied. We identified methylated DNA markers (MDMs) for discrimination of colorectal neoplasia in LS and determined if these MDMs were comparably discriminant in sporadic patients. Patients & methods: For LS discovery, we evaluated DNA from 53 colorectal case and control tissues using next generation sequencing. For validation, blinded methylation-specific PCR assays to the selected MDMs were performed on 197 cases and controls. Results: OPLAH was the most discriminant MDM with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ≥0.97 for colorectal neoplasia in LS and sporadic tissues. ALKBH5, was uniquely hypermethylated in LS neoplasms. Conclusion: Highly discriminant MDMs for colorectal neoplasia in LS were identified with potential use in screening and surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veroushka Ballester
- Division of Digestive & Liver Diseases, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - William R Taylor
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | | | - Tracy C Yab
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Frank A Sinicrope
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | | | - Marcia R Cruz-Correa
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, PR 00936, USA
| | - Thomas C Smyrk
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Lisa A Boardman
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - David A Ahlquist
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - John B Kisiel
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Affiliation(s)
- John B. Kisiel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rochester Minnesota, USA
| | - Paul J. Limburg
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rochester Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Multitarget stool DNA testing for the prevention of colon cancer: outcomes in a large integrated healthcare system. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:334-341. [PMID: 31904379 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) testing is used in primary care as a screening test for colon cancer. Test effectiveness and patient compliance were examined in clinical practice. METHODS We assessed outcomes of MT-sDNA testing in a cohort study conducted in a large integrated healthcare system comprising 15 hospitals and 150 outpatient clinics using advanced electronic data capture (Clarity2 [Epic, Verona, Wisc, USA] and REDCap [Encinitas, Calif, USA]) followed by manual chart review to confirm MT-sDNA test results and to monitor the outcomes of subsequent colonoscopy. RESULTS A total of 6835 MT-sDNA tests were performed over 1 year between 2017 and 2018. Of 1242 patients (18%) who tested positive, 1109 (89%) were referred for colonoscopy, and 905 of them (73%) underwent colonoscopy. Eleven patients (<1%) with a positive test had colorectal cancer, 215 (17%) had advanced adenomas, 110 (9%) had serrated adenomas, and 546 (60%) patients had an adenoma. Of the 6835 patients tested, adenoma or cancer was found in 557 patients (8%). An advanced adenoma or cancer was found in 226 of 1242 patients with a positive test (18%). Nonadherence with colonoscopy after a positive test was high (21%), and the cost to detect 1 advanced adenoma or cancer was $38,849. CONCLUSIONS The frequency of adenoma detection by an MT-sDNA screening strategy is low, and many positive tests are not associated with significant findings at colonoscopy. Failure to follow a positive test with colonoscopy is a significant problem that needs to be considered when this screening strategy is adopted.
Collapse
|
33
|
Kisiel JB, Eckmann JD, Limburg PJ. Multitarget Stool DNA for Average Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening: Major Achievements and Future Directions. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2020; 30:553-568. [PMID: 32439088 PMCID: PMC10964930 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2020.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
After 2 screen-setting studies showing high sensitivity for colorectal cancer and advanced precancerous lesions, multitarget stool DNA testing was endorsed by the US Preventative Services Task Force as a first-line colorectal cancer screening test. Uptake has increased exponentially since approval by the US Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Adherence to testing is approximately 70%. Patients with positive results have high diagnostic colonoscopy completion rates in single-center studies. The positive predictive value for colorectal neoplasia in postapproval studies is high. Next-generation test prototypes show promise to extend specificity gains while maintaining high sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John B Kisiel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Jason D Eckmann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. https://twitter.com/JasonEckmannMD
| | - Paul J Limburg
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. https://twitter.com/limburg_paul
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Topçuoğlu BD, Lesniak NA, Ruffin MT, Wiens J, Schloss PD. A Framework for Effective Application of Machine Learning to Microbiome-Based Classification Problems. mBio 2020; 11:e00434-20. [PMID: 32518182 PMCID: PMC7373189 DOI: 10.1128/mbio.00434-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) modeling of the human microbiome has the potential to identify microbial biomarkers and aid in the diagnosis of many diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, diabetes, and colorectal cancer. Progress has been made toward developing ML models that predict health outcomes using bacterial abundances, but inconsistent adoption of training and evaluation methods call the validity of these models into question. Furthermore, there appears to be a preference by many researchers to favor increased model complexity over interpretability. To overcome these challenges, we trained seven models that used fecal 16S rRNA sequence data to predict the presence of colonic screen relevant neoplasias (SRNs) (n = 490 patients, 261 controls and 229 cases). We developed a reusable open-source pipeline to train, validate, and interpret ML models. To show the effect of model selection, we assessed the predictive performance, interpretability, and training time of L2-regularized logistic regression, L1- and L2-regularized support vector machines (SVM) with linear and radial basis function kernels, a decision tree, random forest, and gradient boosted trees (XGBoost). The random forest model performed best at detecting SRNs with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.695 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.651 to 0.739) but was slow to train (83.2 h) and not inherently interpretable. Despite its simplicity, L2-regularized logistic regression followed random forest in predictive performance with an AUROC of 0.680 (IQR, 0.625 to 0.735), trained faster (12 min), and was inherently interpretable. Our analysis highlights the importance of choosing an ML approach based on the goal of the study, as the choice will inform expectations of performance and interpretability.IMPORTANCE Diagnosing diseases using machine learning (ML) is rapidly being adopted in microbiome studies. However, the estimated performance associated with these models is likely overoptimistic. Moreover, there is a trend toward using black box models without a discussion of the difficulty of interpreting such models when trying to identify microbial biomarkers of disease. This work represents a step toward developing more-reproducible ML practices in applying ML to microbiome research. We implement a rigorous pipeline and emphasize the importance of selecting ML models that reflect the goal of the study. These concepts are not particular to the study of human health but can also be applied to environmental microbiology studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Begüm D Topçuoğlu
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Nicholas A Lesniak
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Mack T Ruffin
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Medicine, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jenna Wiens
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Patrick D Schloss
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ebner DW, Kisiel JB. Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Performance Benchmarks Lead to High Expected Efficacy. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2020; 22:32. [PMID: 32494878 PMCID: PMC7271040 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-020-00770-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Participation goals for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the USA have not been met. Non-invasive screening strategies may improve CRC screening participation. We highlight recent literature on stool-based screening performance and expectations for emerging non-invasive screening tests. RECENT FINDINGS Stool-based CRC screening detects screen-relevant colorectal neoplasia and outperforms a currently available plasma assay. Though modestly sensitive for CRC, adherence to annual fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is sub-optimal. Multi-target stool DNA (MT-sDNA) has greater adherence, superior sensitivity for screen-relevant lesions (including those in the proximal colon and sessile serrated architecture), and equivalent specificity to FIT over a 3-year period. Stool-based CRC screening tests are anticipated to reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC through detection of early-stage cancers and high-risk polyps. These endpoints in performance will need to be met by emerging blood sample-based tests in order have meaningful impact in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek W Ebner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - John B Kisiel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tepus M, Yau TO. Non-Invasive Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Overview. Gastrointest Tumors 2020; 7:62-73. [PMID: 32903904 DOI: 10.1159/000507701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) follows a protracted stepwise progression, from benign adenomas to malignant adenocarcinomas. If detected early, 90% of deaths are preventable. However, CRC is asymptomatic in its early-stage and arises sporadically within the population. Therefore, CRC screening is a public health priority. Summary Faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is gradually replacing guaiac faecal occult blood test and is now the most commonly used screening tool for CRC screening program globally. However, FIT is still limited by the haemoglobin degradation and the intermittent bleeding patterns, so that one in four CRC cases are still diagnosed in a late stage, leading to poor prognosis. A multi-target stool DNA test (Cologuard, a combination of NDRG4 and BMP3 DNA methylation, KRAS mutations, and haemoglobin) and a plasma SEPT9 DNA methylation test (Epi proColon) are non-invasive tools also approved by the US FDA, but those screening approaches are not cost-effective, and the detection accuracies remain unsatisfactory. In addition to the approved tests, faecal-/blood-based microRNA and CRC-related gut microbiome screening markers are under development, with work ongoing to find the best combination of molecular biomarkers which maximise the screening sensitivity and specificity. Key Message Maximising the detection accuracy with a cost-effective approach for non-invasive CRC screening is urgently needed to further reduce the incidence of CRC and associated mortality rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Tepus
- John van Geest Cancer Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Tung On Yau
- John van Geest Cancer Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
RAS Mutational Status Detection in Tissue, Plasma, and Stool Samples for Colorectal Cancer. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2020; 2020:5419634. [PMID: 32351996 PMCID: PMC7174943 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5419634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Objective RAS gene testing on tumor tissue biopsies is required for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, it is infeasible for patients after curative surgery and repeated biopsy. This study is aimed at evaluating the consistency of RAS genes in patient's plasma, stool, and tumor tissue samples, to explore whether plasma and stool samples can supplement or replace tumor tissue to assess baseline RAS gene status. Methods Between June 2016 and October 2017, 53 patients with stage I-IV CRC from the Liaoning Cancer Hospital and the Department of Medical Oncology of the First Hospital of China Medical University were enrolled in the study. Patient tissues, peripheral blood, and stool samples were collected, and RAS gene tests were performed. Results Analysis of the KRAS gene in tissue, plasma, and stool samples from 53 CRC patients detected 25 cases (47%) of KRAS gene mutations in the tissue samples, 20 cases (38%) of KRAS gene mutations in plasma, and 18 (34%) KRAS gene mutations in fecal samples. The overall consistency of KRAS gene status between tissue samples and plasma samples was 77.4% (p ≤ 0.05) and between tissue samples and stool samples was 83% (p ≤ 0.05). In stage IV cases, the agreement of KRAS gene status between tissue and plasma samples was 93.8% (p ≤ 0.05) and 93.8% (p ≤ 0.05) between tissue and stool samples. Conclusion There was a high overall consistency in KRAS mutational assessment between plasma, stool, and tissue samples. In stage IV patients, the consistency of KRAS gene detection between tissue and stools or plasma was higher.
Collapse
|
38
|
Berger BM, Kisiel JB, Imperiale TF, Geenen DJ, Heigh RI, Mahoney DW, Hilsden RJ. Low Incidence of Aerodigestive Cancers in Patients With Negative Results From Colonoscopies, Regardless of Findings From Multitarget Stool DNA Tests. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:864-871. [PMID: 31394289 PMCID: PMC10964931 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS We aimed to compare the incidence of aerodigestive cancers in persons with negative results from colonoscopies and positive vs negative results from multitarget stool DNA tests for colorectal cancer and vs expected incidence. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of 1216 subjects with comprehensive patient records and/or cancer registry data from 3 medical centers in North America. Subjects had no neoplasia or only nonadvanced adenomas, based on screening colonoscopy, and either negative results (concordant with colonoscopy, n = 1011) or positive results (discordant colonoscopy, n = 205) from the multitarget stool DNA test. Outcomes included aerodigestive cancers in discordant vs concordant groups and comparison of observed aerodigestive cancer incidence between the groups and compared with expected incidence for the population, based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data. RESULTS Median follow-up times were comparable between subjects in the discordant (5.3 y; interquartile range, 3.5-5.8 y) and concordant (5.4 y; interquartile range, 3.7-5.8 y) groups. Aerodigestive cancers developed in 5 subjects in the discordant group vs 11 subjects in the concordant group (crude risk ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.8-6.6; adjusted risk ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 0.8-6.2; P = .151). The incidence of aerodigestive cancer was lower in the concordant group than the expected incidence based on SEER data (risk ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6; P = .0008). The incidence of aerodigestive cancer was not significantly greater in the population in the discordant group than the expected incidence based on SEER data (risk ratio, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.3-1.9; P = .599). CONCLUSIONS In a retrospective study with a median follow-up time of 5.4 years, incident aerodigestive cancers were uncommon among subjects with negative findings from colonoscopies, regardless of discordant or concordant results from multitarget stool DNA tests. Patients with negative results from high-quality colonoscopies therefore should not undergo further testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John B Kisiel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Thomas F Imperiale
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Daniel J Geenen
- Wisconsin Center for Advanced Research, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Russell I Heigh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Douglas W Mahoney
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Robert J Hilsden
- Departments of Medicine/Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Multitarget Stool DNA Screening in Clinical Practice: High Positive Predictive Value for Colorectal Neoplasia Regardless of Exposure to Previous Colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115:608-615. [PMID: 32068535 PMCID: PMC7127971 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) testing has grown as a noninvasive screening modality for colorectal cancer (CRC), but real-world clinical data are limited in the post-FDA approval setting. The effect of previous colonoscopy on MT-sDNA performance is not known. We aimed to evaluate findings of colorectal neoplasia (CRN) at diagnostic colonoscopy in patients with positive MT-sDNA testing, stratified by patient exposure to previous colonoscopy. METHODS We identified consecutive patients completing MT-sDNA testing over a 39-month period and reviewed the records of those with positive tests for neoplastic findings at diagnostic colonoscopy. MT-sDNA test positivity rate, adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy, and the positive predictive value (PPV) of MT-sDNA for any CRN and neoplastic subtypes were calculated. RESULTS Of 16,469 MT-sDNA tests completed, testing returned positive in 2,326 (14.1%) patients. After exclusion of patients at increased risk for CRC, 1,801 patients remained, 1,558 (87%) of whom underwent diagnostic colonoscopy; 918 of 1,558 (59%) of these patients had undergone previous colonoscopy, whereas 640 (41%) had not. Any CRN was found in 1,046 of 1,558 patients (PPV = 67%). More neoplastic lesions were found in patients without previous colonoscopy (73%); however, the rates remained high among those who had undergone previous colonoscopy (63%, P < 0.0001). The large majority (79%) of patients had right-sided neoplasia. DISCUSSION MT-sDNA has a high PPV for any CRN regardless of exposure to previous colonoscopy. Right-sided CRN was found at colonoscopy in most patients with positive MT-sDNA testing, representing a potential advantage over other currently available screening modalities for CRC.
Collapse
|
40
|
Eckmann JD, Ebner DW, Kisiel JB. Multi-Target Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Emerging Learning on Real-world Performance. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN GASTROENTEROLOGY 2020; 18:109-119. [PMID: 31965446 PMCID: PMC10966619 DOI: 10.1007/s11938-020-00271-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Multi-target stool DNA (MT-sDNA) was approved in 2014 for use in screening average-risk patients for colorectal cancer (CRC). Here, we highlight recent literature from post-market studies to provide an update on clinical use and utility not possible from pre-approval studies. RECENT FINDINGS MT-sDNA has been included in major society guidelines as an option for colorectal cancer screening, and has seen exponentially increasing use in clinical practice. MT-sDNA appears to be attracting new patients to CRC screening, and patient adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive MT-sDNA test is high. Approximately two-thirds of these patients are found to have colorectal neoplasia (CRN), 80% of whom have at least one right-sided lesion; 1 in 3 will have advanced CRN. High yield of CRN is due not only to post-screening increase in probability but also likely improved endoscopist attention. In those with a negative high-quality colonoscopy after positive MT-sDNA test ("false positive MT-sDNA"), further interventions do not appear to be necessary. SUMMARY MT-sDNA is a promising tool to improve rates and quality of CRC screening. Further investigation should examine MT-sDNA performance in populations at increased risk for CRC, and as an interval test after colonoscopy to detect potentially missed lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason D Eckmann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Derek W Ebner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA
| | - John B Kisiel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Mu J, Huang Y, Cai S, Li Q, Song Y, Yuan Y, Zhang S, Zheng S. Plausibility of an extensive use of stool DNA test for screening advanced colorectal neoplasia. Clin Chim Acta 2019; 501:42-47. [PMID: 31816287 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Revised: 11/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE FIT-DNA test is supposed to be highly sensitive for advanced colorectal neoplasms and is advocated in some developed countries, but lack extensive use in developing countries. METHODS A case control study on stool DNA test for colorectal neoplasms patients was conducted from March 2016 to October 2017 in China. We recruited CRC, colorectal neoplasms and normal controls from ambulatory patients and screening attendees in communities. The stool DNA was tested by a molecular panel similar as ColoGuard in addition to fecal immunochemical test(FIT) in a blinded manner. A risk scoring system was used to determine the positiveness of tests with histological diagnosis as its reference standard. RESULTS Eligible subjects included 203 colorectal cancer (CRC), 49 advanced adenoma (AA), 156 non-advanced adenoma(NAA) and 431 normal controls(NC). The FIT-DNA kit detected 97.5% CRC (n = 198, 95% CI = 95.4-99.7) and 53.1% AA (n = 26, 95% CI = 39.1-67.0), with specificity of 89.1% (95% CI = 86.2-92.0) in NC and 88.1% (95% CI = 85.5-90.7) in non-advanced controls. The FIT embedded in the kit alone identified 94.6% (n = 192, 95% CI = 91.5-97.7) CRC and 36.7% AA (n = 18, 95% CI = 23.2-50.2). Consistency of KRAS mutation, BMP3 methylation, NDRG4 methylation in 26 paires stool DNA and CRC tumor DNA were 80.9%, 71.4% and 81.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION At the sacrifice of significantly decreased specificity, a FIT-DNA kit may has better sensitivity than FIT for predicting advanced colorectal adenoma, but not for predicting colorectal cancer. More evidences are needed for the extensive use of FIT-DNA testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayi Mu
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China
| | - Yanqin Huang
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China.
| | - Shanrong Cai
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China
| | - Qilong Li
- Jiashan Institute of Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yongmao Song
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China
| | - Ying Yuan
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China
| | - Suzhan Zhang
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China
| | - Shu Zheng
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Selby K, Levine EH, Doan C, Gies A, Brenner H, Quesenberry C, Lee JK, Corley DA. Effect of Sex, Age, and Positivity Threshold on Fecal Immunochemical Test Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2019; 157:1494-1505. [PMID: 31472152 PMCID: PMC6878177 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Revised: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Quantitative fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin are commonly used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aimed to quantify the change in CRC and advanced adenoma detection and number of positive test results at different positivity thresholds and by sex and age. METHODS We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE, selecting articles of FIT for CRC detection in asymptomatic adults undergoing screening. We calculated sensitivity and specificity, as well as detected number of cancers, advanced adenomas, and positive test results at positivity thresholds ≤10 μg hemoglobin/g feces, 10 to ≤20 μg/g, 20 to ≤30 μg/g, and >30 μg/g. We also analyzed results from stratified by patient sex, age, and reference standard. RESULTS Our meta-analysis comprised 46 studies with 2.4 million participants and 6478 detected cancers. Sensitivity for detection of CRC increased from 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63%-75%) at thresholds >10 μg/g and ≤20 μg/g to 80% (95% CI, 76%-83%) at thresholds ≤10 μg/g. At these threshold values, sensitivity for detection of advanced adenomas increased from 21% (95% CI, 18%-25%) to 31% (95% CI, 27%-35%), whereas specificity decreased from 94% (95% CI, 93%-96%) to 91% (95% CI, 89%-93%). In 3 studies stratified by sex, sensitivity of CRC detection was 77% in men (95% CI, 75%-79%) and 81% in women (95% CI, 60%-100%) (P = .68). In 3 studies stratified by age groups, sensitivity of CRC detection was 85% for ages 50-59 years (95% CI, 71%-99%) and 73% for ages 60-69 years (95% CI, 71%-75%) (P = .10). All studies with colonoscopy follow-up had similar sensitivity levels for detection of CRC to studies that analyzed 2-year registry follow-up data (74%; 95% CI, 68%-78% vs 75%; 95% CI, 73%-77%). CONCLUSIONS In a meta-analysis of studies that analyzed detection of CRC and advanced adenomas at different FIT positivity thresholds, we found the sensitivity and specificity of detection to vary with positive cutoff value. It might be possible to decrease positive threshold values for centers with sufficient follow-up colonoscopy resources. More research is needed to precisely establish FIT thresholds for each sex and age subgroup. PROTOCOL PROSPERO CRD42017068760.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Selby
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California; Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Emma H Levine
- University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Cecilia Doan
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California
| | - Anton Gies
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jeffrey K Lee
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Novel Methylated DNA Markers Discriminate Advanced Neoplasia in Pancreatic Cysts: Marker Discovery, Tissue Validation, and Cyst Fluid Testing. Am J Gastroenterol 2019; 114:1539-1549. [PMID: 31306149 PMCID: PMC7294458 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) may be precancerous. Those likely to harbor high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or pancreatic cancer (PC) are targets for surgical resection. Current algorithms to predict advanced neoplasia (HGD/PC) in PCLs lack diagnostic accuracy. In pancreatic tissue and cyst fluid (CF) from PCLs, we sought to identify and validate novel methylated DNA markers (MDMs) that discriminate HGD/PC from low-grade dysplasia (LGD) or no dysplasia (ND). METHODS From an unbiased whole-methylome discovery approach using predefined selection criteria followed by multistep validation on case (HGD or PC) and control (ND or LGD) tissues, we identified discriminant MDMs. Top candidate MDMs were then assayed by quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction on archival CF from surgically resected PCLs. RESULTS Of 25 discriminant MDMs identified in tissue, 13 were selected for validation in 134 CF samples (21 cases [8 HGD, 13 PC], 113 controls [45 ND, 68 LGD]). A tree-based algorithm using 2 CF-MDMs (TBX15, BMP3) achieved sensitivity and specificity above 90%. Discrimination was significantly better by this CF-MDM panel than by mutant KRAS or carcinoembryonic antigen, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.86-0.99), 0.71 (0.57-0.85), and 0.72 (0.60-0.84), respectively. Cutoffs for the MDM panel applied to an independent CF validation set (31 cases, 56 controls) yielded similarly high discrimination, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.86 (95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.94, P = 0.2). DISCUSSION Novel MDMs discovered and validated in tissue accurately identify PCLs harboring HGD/PC. A panel of 2 MDMs assayed in CF yielded results with potential to enhance current risk prediction algorithms. Prospective studies are indicated to optimize and further evaluate CF-MDMs for clinical use.
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Fecal (or stool) DNA examination is a noninvasive strategy recommended by several medical professional societies for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in average-risk individuals. Fecal DNA tests assay stool for human DNA shed principally from the colon. Colonic lesions such as adenomatous and serrated polyps and cancers exfoliate cells containing neoplastically altered DNA that may be detected by sensitive assays that target specific genetic and epigenetic biomarkers to discriminate neoplastic lesions from non-neoplastic tissue. Cross-sectional validation studies confirmed initial case-control studies' assessment of performance of an optimized multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test, leading to approval by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2014. Compared to colonoscopy, mt-sDNA showed sensitivity of 92% for detection of CRC, much higher than the 74% sensitivity of another recommended noninvasive strategy, fecal immunochemical testing (FIT). Detections of advanced adenomas and sessile serrated polyps were higher with mt-sDNA than FIT (42% versus 24% and 42% versus 5%, respectively), but overall specificity for all lesions was lower (87% versus 95%). The mt-sDNA test increases patient life-years gained in CRC screening simulations, but its cost relative to other screening strategies needs to be reduced by 80-90% or its sensitivity for polyp detection enhanced to be cost effective. Noninvasive CRC screening strategies such as fecal DNA, however, have the potential to significantly increase national screening rates due to their noninvasive nature and convenience for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Carethers
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Human Genetics and Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ponti G, Manfredini M, Tomasi A. Non-blood sources of cell-free DNA for cancer molecular profiling in clinical pathology and oncology. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 141:36-42. [PMID: 31212145 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Revised: 09/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Liquid biopsy can quantify and qualify cell-free (cfDNA) and tumour-derived (ctDNA) DNA fragments in the bloodstream. CfDNA quantification and mutation analysis can be applied to diagnosis, follow-up and therapeutic management as novel oncologic biomarkers. However, some tumor-types release a low amount of DNA into the bloodstream, hampering diagnosis through standard liquid biopsy procedures. Several tumors, as such as brain, kidney, prostate, and thyroid cancer, are in direct contact with other body fluids and may be alternative sources for cfDNA and ctDNA. Non-blood sources of cfDNA/ctDNA useful as novel oncologic biomarkers include cerebrospinal fluids, urine, sputum, saliva, pleural effusion, stool and seminal fluid. Seminal plasma cfDNA, which can be analyzed with cost-effective procedures, may provide powerful information capable to revolutionize prostate cancer (PCa) patient diagnosis and management. In the near future, cfDNA analysis from non-blood biological liquids will become routine clinical practice for cancer patient diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Ponti
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Dental & Morphological Sciences with Interest Transplant, Oncological & Regenerative Medicine, Division of Clinical Pathology, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
| | - Marco Manfredini
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Dental & Morphological Sciences with Interest Transplant, Oncological & Regenerative Medicine, Dermatology Unit, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Aldo Tomasi
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Dental & Morphological Sciences with Interest Transplant, Oncological & Regenerative Medicine, Division of Clinical Pathology, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kisiel JB, Klepp P, Allawi HT, Taylor WR, Giakoumopoulos M, Sander T, Yab TC, Moum BA, Lidgard GP, Brackmann S, Mahoney DW, Roseth A, Ahlquist DA. Analysis of DNA Methylation at Specific Loci in Stool Samples Detects Colorectal Cancer and High-Grade Dysplasia in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:914-921.e5. [PMID: 29775793 PMCID: PMC6368476 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2017] [Revised: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, are at increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC). Analyses of DNA methylation patterns in stool samples have been reported to detect CRC in patients with IBD. We sought to validate these findings in larger cohorts and assess the accuracy of analysis of DNA methylation patterns in stool for detection of CRC and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) normalized to methylation level at ZDHHC1. METHODS We obtained buffered, frozen stool samples from a US case-control study and from 2 European surveillance cohorts (referral or population based) of patients with chronic ulcerative colitis (n = 248), Crohn's disease (n = 82), indeterminate colitis (n = 2), or IBD with primary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 38). Stool samples were collected before bowel preparation for colonoscopy or at least 1 week after colonoscopy. Among the study samples, stools from individuals with IBD but without neoplasia were used as controls (n = 291). DNA was isolated from stool, exposed to bisulfite, and then assayed by multiplex quantitative allele-specific real-time target and signal amplification. We analyzed methylation levels of BMP3, NDRG4, VAV3, and SFMBT2 relative to the methylation level of ZDHHC1, and compared these between patients with CRC or HGD and controls. RESULTS Levels of methylation at BMP3 and VAV3, relative to ZDHHC1 methylation, identified patients with CRC and HGD with an area under the curve value of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.77-1.00). Methylation levels at specific promotor regions of these genes identified 11 of the 12 patients with CRC and HGD, with 92% sensitivity (95% CI, 60%-100%) and 90% specificity (95% CI, 86%-93%). The proportion of false-positive results did not differ significantly among the case-control, referral cohort, and population cohort studies (P = .60) when the 90% specificity cut-off from the whole sample set was applied. CONCLUSIONS In an analysis of stool samples from 3 independent studies of 332 patients with IBD, we associated levels of methylation at 2 genes (BMP3 and VAV3), relative to level of methylation at ZDHHC1, with detection of CRC and HGD. These methylation patterns identified patients with CRC and HGD with more than 90% specificity, and might be used in CRC surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John B Kisiel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Pasquale Klepp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lovisenberg Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Clinical Medicine, University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hatim T Allawi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Akershus University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - William R Taylor
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Tracy C Yab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bjorn A Moum
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Stephan Brackmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, Akershus University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Clinical Medicine, University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Douglas W Mahoney
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Arne Roseth
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lovisenberg Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - David A Ahlquist
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Imperiale TF, Gruber RN, Stump TE, Emmett TW, Monahan PO. Performance Characteristics of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenomatous Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2019; 170:319-329. [PMID: 30802902 DOI: 10.7326/m18-2390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies report inconsistent performance of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced adenomas. PURPOSE To summarize performance characteristics of FITs for CRC and advanced adenomas in average-risk persons undergoing screening colonoscopy (reference standard) and to identify factors affecting these characteristics. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception through October 2018; reference lists of studies and reviews. STUDY SELECTION Two reviewers independently screened records to identify published English-language prospective or retrospective observational studies that evaluated FIT sensitivity and specificity for colonoscopic findings in asymptomatic, average-risk adults. DATA EXTRACTION Two authors independently extracted data and evaluated study quality. DATA SYNTHESIS Thirty-one studies (120 255 participants; 18 FITs) were included; all were judged to have low to moderate risk of bias. Performance characteristics depended on the threshold for a positive result. A threshold of 10 µg/g resulted in sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.84 to 0.95) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.10 (CI, 0.06 to 0.19) for CRC, whereas a threshold of greater than 20 µg/g resulted in specificity of 0.95 (CI, 0.94 to 0.96) and a positive likelihood ratio of 15.49 (CI, 9.82 to 22.39). For advanced adenomas, sensitivity was 0.40 (CI, 0.33 to 0.47) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.67 (CI, 0.57 to 0.78) at 10 µg/g, and specificity was 0.95 (CI, 0.94 to 0.96) and the positive likelihood ratio was 5.86 (CI, 3.77 to 8.97) at greater than 20 µg/g. Studies had low to high heterogeneity, depending on the threshold. Although several FITs had adequate performance, sensitivity and specificity for CRC for 1 qualitative FIT were 0.90 and 0.91, respectively, at its single threshold of 10 µg/g; positive and negative likelihood ratios were 10.13 and 0.11, respectively. Comparison of 3 FITs at 3 thresholds was inconclusive: CIs overlapped, and the comparisons were across rather than within studies. LIMITATIONS Only English-language studies were included. Incomplete reporting limited quality assessment of some evidence. Performance characteristics are for 1-time rather than serial testing. CONCLUSION Single-application FITs have moderate to high sensitivity and specificity for CRC, depending on the positivity threshold. Sensitivity of 1-time testing for advanced adenomas is low, regardless of the threshold. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F Imperiale
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, and Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana (T.F.I.)
| | | | - Timothy E Stump
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana (T.E.S., P.O.M.)
| | | | - Patrick O Monahan
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana (T.E.S., P.O.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Fu X, Huang Y, Fan X, Deng Y, Liu H, Zou H, Wu P, Chen Z, Huang J, Wang J, Lin H, Huang S, Tan X, Lan P, Wang L, Wang JP. Demographic trends and KRAS/BRAF V600E mutations in colorectal cancer patients of South China: A single-site report. Int J Cancer 2019; 144:2109-2117. [PMID: 30414169 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in China. Here, we aimed to evaluate the latest demographic trends and KRAS/BRAF mutations status of Chinese CRC. Five thousand five hundred and forty-six CRC patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2017 were involved. KRAS exon 2 and BRAFV600E mutations were detected by Sanger sequencing and high-resolution melting analysis or allelic-specific probe method. Gene mutation profiles and clinicopathologic characteristics of 5495 patients were analyzed. The joinpoint regression model was used to predict the demographic data in 2018. We found KRAS exon 2 and BRAFV600E mutation rates were 37.7 and 2.8% in CRC patients. Tumors with KRAS exon 2 mutations were more likely to be present in female and patients aged older than 75 years, right colon and have well-differentiated histology. Tumors with BRAFV600E mutations were more likely to be present in the female, right colon and have poorly differentiated histology. From 2010 to 2017, the percentage of colon cancer and tubular adenocarcinoma in CRC increased substantially (from 39.3 to 51.8%, from 78.6 to 93.4%, respectively). The percentage of right colon cancer increased from 18.3 to 20.5%, which predictively may keep at 22.6% in 2018. The rise trends for patients with moderate differentiation tumor or KRAS exon 2 mutated tumor were apparent (from 50.3 to 78.6%, from 32.8 to 39.7%, respectively). In conclusion, in recent 8 years, there is a shift to the colon, especially right colon in the incidence of Chinese CRC. Moreover tubular adenocarcinoma is becoming the primary histology type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinhui Fu
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Pathology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan Huang
- Department of Pathology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinjuan Fan
- Department of Pathology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanhong Deng
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huanliang Liu
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hongzhi Zou
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Peihuang Wu
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiting Chen
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Pathology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jinglin Huang
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Pathology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jingxuan Wang
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hanjie Lin
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Pathology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuhui Huang
- Department of Pathology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoli Tan
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Pathology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ping Lan
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of GI Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of GI Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian-Ping Wang
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Redwood DG, Blake ID, Provost EM, Kisiel JB, Sacco FD, Ahlquist DA. Alaska Native Patient and Provider Perspectives on the Multitarget Stool DNA Test Compared With Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening. J Prim Care Community Health 2019; 10:2150132719884295. [PMID: 31646933 PMCID: PMC6820167 DOI: 10.1177/2150132719884295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Alaska Native (AN) people have among the world's highest rate of colorectal cancer (CRC). We assessed perceptions of AN people and their health care providers of a new take-home multitarget stool DNA test (MT-sDNA; Cologuard) relative to colonoscopy. Methods: Cross-sectional surveys of AN people aged 40 to 75 years (mailed) and providers (online). Results: Participants included 1616 AN patients (19% response rate) and 87 providers (26% response rate; 57% AN people). Over half (58%) of patients preferred colonoscopy for CRC screening, while 36% preferred MT-sDNA. Unscreened patients were significantly more likely to state a preference for MT-sDNA than previously screened patients (42% vs 31%, P < .05) as were younger patients (<60 years old) compared with older patients (40% vs 30%, P < .05). Most providers thought that MT-sDNA would improve screening rates (69%), would recommend if available (79%), and be implementable (79%). Perceived barriers differed substantially between patients and providers in both type and magnitude. Leading colonoscopy barriers reported by patients were travel (44%) and bowel preparation (40%), while providers thought that fear of pain (92%) and invasiveness of the test (87%) were the primary barriers. For MT-sDNA, patients' belief that colonoscopy was better (56%) and not knowing how to do the test (40%) were primary barriers, while providers thought stool collection (67%) and having a stool sample in their home (63%) were leading barriers. Conclusions: This study found that MT-sDNA has potential acceptability among AN people and their health care providers. Both groups reported a willingness to use MT-sDNA and did not perceive major barriers to its use. This preference was especially true of unscreened and younger patients. The majority of providers indicated they would use MT-sDNA if available and that it would improve CRC screening rates. In this population, where colonoscopy access is limited, MT-sDNA has the potential to improve CRC screening adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ian D. Blake
- Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, AK, USA
| | | | | | - Frank D. Sacco
- Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, AK, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Universal cancer screening: revolutionary, rational, and realizable. NPJ Precis Oncol 2018; 2:23. [PMID: 30393772 PMCID: PMC6206005 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-018-0066-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Revised: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer remains the second leading cause of mortality worldwide, and overall cancer-related deaths are increasing. Despite the survival benefit from early detection, screening has to date targeted only those few organs that harbor tumors of sufficient prevalence to show cost-effectiveness at population levels, leaving most cancer types unscreened. In this perspective overview, a case is made for universal cancer screening as a logical and more inclusive approach with potentially high impact. The centrally important conceptual drivers to universal screening are biological and epidemiological. The shared biology of tumor marker release into a common distant medium, like blood, can be exploited for multi-cancer detection from a single test. And, by aggregating prevalence rates, universal screening allows all cancers (including less common ones) to be included as targets, increases screening efficiency and integration across tumor types, and potentially improves cost-effectiveness over single-organ approaches. The identification of new tumor marker classes with both broad expression across tumor types and site-prediction, remarkable advances in assay technologies, and compelling early clinical data increase the likelihood of actualizing this new paradigm. Multi-organ screening could be achieved by targeting markers within or stemming from the circulation (including blood, urine, saliva, and expired breath) or those exfoliated into common excretory pathways (including the gastrointestinal and female reproductive tracts). Rigorous clinical studies in intended use populations and collaborations between academia, industry, professional societies, and government will be required to bring this lofty vision to a population application.
Collapse
|