1
|
Jentzer JC, Senghavi D, Patel PC, Bhattacharyya A, van Diepen S, Herasevich V, Gajic O, Kashani KB. Shock Severity Classification and Mortality in Adults With Cardiac, Medical, Surgical, and Neurological Critical Illness. Mayo Clin Proc 2024; 99:727-739. [PMID: 37815781 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Shock Classification could perform risk stratification in a mixed cohort of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, similar to its validation in patients with acute cardiac disease. METHODS We included 21,461 adult Mayo Clinic ICU patient admissions from December 1, 2014, to February 28, 2018, including cardiac ICU (16.7%), medical ICU (37.4%), neurosciences ICU (27.7%), and surgical ICU (18.2%). The SCAI Shock Classification (a 5-stage classification from no shock [A] to refractory shock [E]) was assigned in each 4-hour period during the first 24 hours of ICU admission. RESULTS The median age was 65 years, and 43.2% were female. In-hospital mortality occurred in 1611 (7.5%) patients, with a stepwise increase in in-hospital mortality in each higher maximum SCAI Shock stage overall: A, 4.0%; B, 4.6%; C, 7.0%; D, 13.9%; and E, 40.2%. The SCAI Shock Classification provided incremental mortality risk stratification in each ICU, with the best performance in the cardiac ICU and the worse performance in the neurosciences ICU. The SCAI Shock Classification was associated with higher adjusted in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.32 per each stage; 95% CI, 1.24 to 1.41; P<.001); this association was not observed in the neurosciences ICU when considered separately. CONCLUSION The SCAI Shock Classification provided incremental mortality risk stratification beyond established prognostic markers across the spectrum of medical and surgical critical illness, proving utility outside its original intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob C Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN.
| | - Devang Senghavi
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Parag C Patel
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Anirban Bhattacharyya
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vitaly Herasevich
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
| | - Ognjen Gajic
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
| | - Kianoush B Kashani
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jentzer JC, Sanghavi D, Patel PC, Bhattacharyya A, van Diepen S, Herasevich V, Gajic O, Kashani KB. PROGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF SERIAL DETERMINATION OF THE SOCIETY FOR CARDIOVASCULAR ANGIOGRAPHY AND INTERVENTIONS SHOCK CLASSIFICATION IN ADULTS WITH CRITICAL ILLNESS. Shock 2024; 61:246-252. [PMID: 38150371 DOI: 10.1097/shk.0000000000002292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of the study is to evaluate whether serial assessment of shock severity can improve prognostication in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort of 21,461 ICU patient admissions from 2014 to 2018. We assigned the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Shock Stage in each 4-h block during the first 24 h of ICU admission; shock was defined as SCAI Shock stage C, D, or E. In-hospital mortality was evaluated using logistic regression. Results: The admission SCAI Shock stages were as follows: A, 39.0%; B, 27.0%; C, 28.9%; D, 2.6%; and E, 2.5%. The SCAI Shock stage subsequently increased in 30.6%, and late-onset shock developed in 30.4%. In-hospital mortality was higher in patients who had shock on admission (11.9%) or late-onset shock (7.3%) versus no shock (4.3%). Persistence of shock predicted higher mortality (adjusted OR = 1.09; 95% CI = 1.06-1.13, for each ICU block with shock). The mean SCAI Shock stage had higher discrimination for in-hospital mortality than the admission or maximum SCAI Shock stage. Dynamic modeling of the SCAI Shock classification improved discrimination for in-hospital mortality (C-statistic = 0.64-0.71). Conclusions: Serial application of the SCAI Shock classification provides improved mortality risk stratification compared with a single assessment on admission, facilitating dynamic prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob C Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Devang Sanghavi
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Parag C Patel
- Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Vitaly Herasevich
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ognjen Gajic
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roeschl T, Hinrichs N, Hommel M, Pfahringer B, Balzer F, Falk V, O'Brien B, Ott SC, Potapov E, Schoenrath F, Meyer A. Systematic Assessment of Shock Severity in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 82:1691-1706. [PMID: 37852698 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) shock classification has been shown to provide robust mortality risk stratification in a variety of cardiovascular patients. OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the SCAI shock classification in postoperative cardiac surgery intensive care unit (CSICU) patients. METHODS This study retrospectively analyzed 26,792 postoperative CSICU admissions at a heart center between 2012 and 2022. Patients were classified into SCAI shock stages A to E using electronic health record data. Moreover, the impact of late deterioration (LD) as an additional risk modifier was investigated. RESULTS The proportions of patients in SCAI shock stages A to E were 24.4%, 18.8%, 8.4%, 35.5%, and 12.9%, and crude hospital mortality rates were 0.4%, 0.6%, 3.3%, 4.9%, and 30.2%, respectively. Similarly, the prevalence of postoperative complications and organ dysfunction increased across SCAI shock stages. After multivariable adjustment, each higher SCAI shock stage was associated with increased hospital mortality (adjusted OR: 1.26-16.59) compared with SCAI shock stage A, as was LD (adjusted OR: 8.2). The SCAI shock classification demonstrated a strong diagnostic performance for hospital mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic: 0.84), which noticeably increased when LD was incorporated into the model (area under the receiver operating characteristic: 0.90). CONCLUSIONS The SCAI shock classification effectively risk-stratifies postoperative CSICU patients for mortality, postoperative complications, and organ dysfunction. Its application could, therefore, be extended to the field of cardiac surgery as a triage tool in postoperative care and as a selection criterion in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Roeschl
- Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Medical Informatics, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Nils Hinrichs
- Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Medical Informatics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Hommel
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Boris Pfahringer
- Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Centre for Cardiovascular Telemedicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Balzer
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Medical Informatics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volkmar Falk
- Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Translational Cardiovascular Technologies, Institute of Translational Medicine, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin O'Brien
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Berlin, Germany; St Bartholomew's Hospital and Barts Heart Centre, Department of Perioperative Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sascha Christoph Ott
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Berlin, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Evgenij Potapov
- Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Schoenrath
- Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Meyer
- Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Medical Informatics, Berlin, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Upadhrasta S, Museedi A, Thannoun T, Chaanine AH, Le Jemtel TH. Early Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock. Cardiol Rev 2023; 31:215-218. [PMID: 36730923 PMCID: PMC10278569 DOI: 10.1097/crd.0000000000000485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Reversal of cardiogenic shock depends on its early recognition and prompt initiation of therapy. Recognition of the clinical and hemodynamic deterioration that precedes cardiogenic shock is a crucial step in its early detection. Treatment of pre-cardiogenic shock is chiefly pharmacologic with intravenous administration of pressor, inotropic, and loop diuretic agents. Failure to reverse the preshock state with pharmacotherapy entails progression to cardiogenic shock and the need for prompt mechanical circulatory support with membrane oxygenation and possibly left ventricular decompression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sireesha Upadhrasta
- From the Department of Cardiology, John W. Deming Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Abdulrahman Museedi
- From the Department of Cardiology, John W. Deming Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Tariq Thannoun
- From the Department of Cardiology, John W. Deming Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Antoine H. Chaanine
- From the Department of Cardiology, John W. Deming Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Thierry H. Le Jemtel
- From the Department of Cardiology, John W. Deming Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Urina Jassir D, Chaanine AH, Desai S, Rajapreyar I, Le Jemtel TH. Therapeutic Dilemmas in Mixed Septic-Cardiogenic Shock. Am J Med 2023; 136:27-32. [PMID: 36252709 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Sepsis is an increasing cause of decompensation in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Sepsis and decompensated heart failure results in a mixed septic-cardiogenic shock that poses several therapeutic dilemmas: Rapid fluid resuscitation is the cornerstone of sepsis management, while loop diuretics are the main stay of decompensated heart failure treatment. Whether inotropic therapy with dobutamine or inodilators improves microvascular alterations remains unsettled in sepsis. When to resume loop diuretic therapy in patients with sepsis and decompensated heart failure is unclear. In the absence of relevant guidelines, we review vasopressor therapy, the timing and volume of fluid resuscitation, and the need for inotropic therapy in patients who, with sepsis and decompensated heart failure, present with a mixed septic-cardiogenic shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Urina Jassir
- Department of Cardiology, John W. Deming Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, La
| | - Antoine H Chaanine
- Department of Cardiology, John W. Deming Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, La
| | - Sapna Desai
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, La
| | - Indranee Rajapreyar
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Penn
| | - Thierry H Le Jemtel
- Department of Cardiology, John W. Deming Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, La.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jentzer JC, Rayfield C, Soussi S, Berg DD, Kennedy JN, Sinha SS, Baran DA, Brant E, Mebazaa A, Billia F, Kapur NK, Henry TD, Lawler PR. Advances in the Staging and Phenotyping of Cardiogenic Shock: Part 1 of 2. JACC. ADVANCES 2022; 1:100120. [PMID: 38939719 PMCID: PMC11198663 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a heterogeneous syndrome reflecting a broad spectrum of shock severity, diverse etiologies, variable cardiac function, different hemodynamic trajectories, and concomitant organ dysfunction. These factors influence the clinical presentation, management, response to therapy, and outcomes of CS patients, necessitating a tailored approach to care. To better understand the variability inherent to CS populations, recent algorithms for staging the severity of CS have been described and validated. This paper is part 1 of a 2-part state-of-the-art review. In this first article, we consider the context for clinical staging and stratification in CS with a focus on established severity staging systems for CS and their use for risk stratification and clinical care. We describe the use of staging for predicting outcomes in populations with or at risk for CS, including risk modifiers that provide more nuanced risk stratification, and highlight how these approaches may allow individualized care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob C. Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Corbin Rayfield
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Sabri Soussi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Lariboisière-Saint-Louis Hospitals, DMU Parabol, AP–HP Nord, Inserm UMR-S 942, Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Conditions (MASCOT), University of Paris, Paris, France
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science and Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David D. Berg
- TIMI Study Group, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jason N. Kennedy
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shashank S. Sinha
- INOVA Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - David A. Baran
- Cleveland Clinic Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - Emily Brant
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alexandre Mebazaa
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Lariboisière-Saint-Louis Hospitals, DMU Parabol, AP–HP Nord, Inserm UMR-S 942, Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Conditions (MASCOT), University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Filio Billia
- Peter Munk Cardiac Center and Ted Roger’s Center for Heart Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Navin K. Kapur
- The Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Timothy D. Henry
- The Carl and Edyth Lindner Center for Research and Education at the Christ Hospital Health Network, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Patrick R. Lawler
- Peter Munk Cardiac Center and Ted Roger’s Center for Heart Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Cardiology and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
González-Pacheco H, Gopar-Nieto R, Araiza-Garaygordobil D, Briseño-Cruz JL, Eid-Lidt G, Ortega-Hernandez JA, Sierra-Lara D, Altamirano-Castillo A, Mendoza-García S, Manzur-Sandoval D, Aguilar-Montaño KM, Ontiveros-Mercado H, García-Espinosa JI, Pérez-Pinetta PE, Arias-Mendoza A. Application of the SCAI classification to admission of patients with cardiogenic shock: Analysis of a tertiary care center in a middle-income country. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0273086. [PMID: 35972946 PMCID: PMC9380918 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims The Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) shock stages have been applied and validated in high-income countries with access to advanced therapies. We applied the SCAI scheme at the time of admission in order to improve the risk stratification for 30-day mortality in a retrospective cohort of patients with STEMI in a middle-income country hospital at admission. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 7,143 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. At admission, patients were stratified by the SCAI shock stages. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the association between SCAI shock stages to 30-day mortality. Results The distribution of the patients across SCAI shock stages was 82.2%, 9.3%, 1.2%, 1.5%, and 0.8% to A, B, C, D, and E, respectively. Patients with SCAI stages C, D, and E were more likely to have high-risk features. There was a stepwise significant increase in unadjusted 30-day mortality across the SCAI shock stages (6.3%, 8.4%, 62.4%, 75.2% and 88.3% for A, B, C, D and E, respectively; P < 0.0001, C-statistic, 0.64). A trend toward a lower 30-day survival probability was observed in the patients with advanced CS (30.3, 15.4%, and 8.3%, SCAI shock stages C, D, and E, respectively, Log-rank P-value <0.0001). After multivariable adjustment, SCAI shock stages C, D, and E were independently associated with an increased risk of 30-day death (hazard ratio 1.42 [P = 0.02], 2.30 [P<0.0001], and 3.44 [P<0.0001], respectively). Conclusion The SCAI shock stages applied in patients con STEMI at the time of admission, is a useful tool for risk stratification in patients across the full spectrum of CS and is a predictor of 30-day mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Héctor González-Pacheco
- Coronary Care Unit, National Institute of Cardiology in Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
- * E-mail:
| | - Rodrigo Gopar-Nieto
- Coronary Care Unit, National Institute of Cardiology in Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - José Luis Briseño-Cruz
- Coronary Care Unit, National Institute of Cardiology in Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Guering Eid-Lidt
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, National Institute of Cardiology in Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Daniel Sierra-Lara
- Coronary Care Unit, National Institute of Cardiology in Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | - Daniel Manzur-Sandoval
- Coronary Care Unit, National Institute of Cardiology in Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|