Upstream regions of the estrogen receptor alpha proximal promoter transcript regulate ER protein expression through a translational mechanism

Estrogen-sensitive PTPRO expression represses hepatocellular carcinoma progression by control of STAT3

Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O (PTPRO), one of the receptor types of phosphotyrosine phosphatases (PTP), was recently described as a tumor suppressor in various kinds of cancers. We aimed to clarify the role of PTPRO in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It was demonstrated in 180 pairs (120 male and 60 female) of clinical HCC specimens that the PTPRO level was significantly reduced, as compared with adjacent tissue, and the PTPRO level in male adjacent tissue was lower than in female. We further found that estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) could up-regulate PTPRO expression as a transcription factor. Moreover, an in vitro study showed that cell proliferation was inhibited and apoptosis was promoted in PTPRO-transduced HCC cell lines, whereas an in vivo study represented that tumor number and size was increased in ptpro(-/-) mice. As a result of its tumor-suppressive position, PTPRO was proved to down-regulate signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT3) activity dependent on Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) dephosphorylation.

CONCLUSIONS

PTPRO expression results in pathological deficiency and gender bias in HCC, which could be attributed to ERα regulation. The suppressive role of PTPRO in HCC could be ascribed to STAT3 inactivation.

Demethylation of promoter C region of estrogen receptor alpha gene is correlated with its enhanced expression in estrogen-ablation resistant MCF-7 cells

Long-term estrogen deprivation (LTED) MCF-7 cells showing estrogen-independent growth, express estrogen receptor (ER) alpha at a much higher level than wild-type MCF-7 cells. Enhanced expression of ERalpha associated with partial localization of ERalpha to the plasma membranes in LTED cells is thought to be an important step for acquisition of estrogen-ablation resistance. In this study, we compared the regulation of ERalpha gene expression between wild type and LTED cells, examining the usage of the promoters A and C as well as their methylation status. We found that transcription from the promoter C was drastically enhanced in LTED cells, compared with that in wild-type cells. Furthermore, the promoter C region was highly unmethylated in LTED cells, but partially methylated in wild-type cells. Our findings imply that demethylation of promoter C region in the ERalpha gene is in part responsible for the enhanced expression of ERalpha gene in LTED cells.

Estradiol regulates different genes in human breast tumor xenografts compared with the identical cells in culture

In breast cancers, estrogen receptor (ER) levels are highly correlated with response to endocrine therapies. We sought to define mechanisms of estrogen (E) signaling in a solid breast tumor model using gene expression profiling. ER(+) T47D-Y human breast cancer cells were grown as xenografts in ovariectomized nude mice under four conditions: 1) 17beta-estradiol for 8 wk (E); 2) without E for 8 wk (control); 3) E for 7 wk followed by 1 wk of E withdrawal (Ewd); or 4) E for 8 wk plus tamoxifen for the last week. E-regulated genes were defined as those that differed significantly between control and E and/or between E and Ewd or control and Ewd. These protocols generated 188 in vivo E-regulated genes that showed two major patterns of regulation. Approximately 46% returned to basal states after Ewd (class I genes); 53% did not (class II genes). In addition, more than 70% of class II-regulated genes also failed to reverse in response to tamoxifen. These genes may be interesting for the study of hormone-resistance issues. A subset of in vivo E-regulated genes appears on lists of clinical ER discriminator genes. These may be useful therapeutic targets or markers of E activity. Comparison of in vivo E-regulated genes with those regulated in identical cells in vitro after 6 and 24 h of E treatment demonstrate only 11% overlap. This indicates the extent to which gene expression profiles are uniquely dependent on hormone-treatment times and the cellular microenvironment.