The Clinical Examination and Socially At-Risk Populations: The Examination Matters for Health Disparities

Health professionals implicit bias of patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) and its effects on clinical decision-making: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Research indicates that people with lower socioeconomic status (SES) receive inferior healthcare and experience poorer health outcomes compared with those with higher SES, in part due to health professional (HP) bias. We conducted a scoping review of the impact of HP bias about SES on clinical decision-making and its effect on the care of adults with lower SES.

DESIGN

JBI scoping review methods were used to perform a systematic comprehensive search for literature. The scoping review protocol has been published in BMJ Open.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, ASSIA, Scopus and CINAHL were searched, from the first available start date of the individual database to March 2023. Two independent reviewers filtered and screened papers.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies of all designs were included in this review to provide a comprehensive map of the existing evidence of the impact of HP bias of SES on clinical decision-making and its effect on the care for people with lower SES.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were gathered using an adapted JBI data extraction tool for systematic scoping reviews.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven papers were included from 1975 to 2023. 35 (73%) of the included primary research studies reported an association between HP SES bias and decision-making. Thirteen (27%) of the included primary research studies did not find an association between HP SES bias and decision-making. Stereotyping and bias can adversely affect decision-making when the HP is fatigued or has a high cognitive load. There is evidence of intersectionality which can have a powerful cumulative effect on HP assessment and subsequent decision-making. HP implicit bias may be mitigated through the assertiveness of the patient with low SES.

CONCLUSION

HP decision-making is at times influenced by non-medical factors for people of low SES, and assumptions are made based on implicit bias and stereotyping, which compound or exacerbate health inequalities. Research that focuses on decision-making when the HP has a high cognitive load, would help the health community to better understand this potential influence.

Racial disparities in ALS diagnostic delay: a single center's experience and review of potential contributing factors

OBJECTIVE

Outcomes for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients are improved with prompt diagnosis, earlier initiation of disease-modifying treatments, and participation in a multidisciplinary clinic. We studied diagnostic delay and disease severity at time of clinic presentation between Black and non-Hispanic Caucasian ALS patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of non-Hispanic Caucasian and Black ALS patients seen in the Virginia Commonwealth University Health System multidisciplinary ALS clinic between 2017 and 2023. Diagnostic delay, ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) and upright forced vital capacity (FVC) scores at baseline appointment were collected. Patient's distance from clinic and affluency of residential neighborhood were evaluated.

RESULTS

We analyzed 172 non-Hispanic Caucasian and 33 Black ALS patients. Black patients had a 64% increase in diagnostic delay compared to non-Hispanic Caucasian patients. Black patients had a lower performance on ALSFRS-R (5.3 points, p < 0.001) and FVC (17.9 percentage points p < 0.001) at time of first clinic visit. Black patients lived closer to clinic, with higher proportion living in the city of Richmond, but in less affluent areas with lower median house income ($55,300 ± 22,600 vs $69,900 ± 23,700).

DISCUSSION

Our findings demonstrate a large racial difference in ALS diagnostic delay, and greater disease severity and lower respiratory function at time of diagnosis for Black ALS patients. Delay in diagnosis prolongs access to disease-modifying therapies, multidisciplinary care, durable medical equipment, and respiratory and nutritional support. Potential sources of these racial disparities include providers' implicit bias and structural racism.

The Impact of Foreign Trade on Health Inequality in China: Evidence From China Family Panel Studies (CFPS)

Objectives: To assess the health inequality caused by foreign trade in China using individual self-rated health data from China Family Panel Studies (CFPS).

Methods: The GMM model was used to explore the direct and indirect effects of foreign trade on health level, and the concentration index method was then used to decompose the contribution of foreign trade to health inequality.

Results: The direct effect of foreign trade does not contribute to the current health inequality, although the indirect effects of trade contribute to health inequality through inequalities in income and healthcare utilization. The indirect pollution effect of trade does not cause health inequality. Subsequently, the direct effect of trade aggravates the dynamic expansion trend of health inequality, whereas the indirect effects of trade alleviate the increasing trend of health inequality.

Conclusion: Although foreign trade improves the overall health level in China, it contributes to health inequality. Optimizing product structure of trade, adjusting income distribution, and enhancing medical securities for low-income groups are necessary to alleviate the health inequality caused by foreign trade.

Cultural Competence and Humility in Infectious Diseases Clinical Practice and Research

Infectious diseases as a specialty is tilted toward social justice, and practitioners are frequently on the front lines of the battle against health inequity in practices that are diverse and sometimes cross international borders. Whether caring for patients living with the human immunodeficiency virus, tuberculosis, or Ebola, infectious diseases practitioners often interact with those at the margins of societies (eg, racial/ethnic/sexual/gender minorities), who disproportionately bear the brunt of these conditions. Therefore, cultural barriers between providers and patients are often salient in the infectious diseases context. In this article, we discuss cultural competence broadly, to include not only the knowledge and the skills needed at both the organizational and the individual levels to provide culturally appropriate care, but also to include "cultural humility"-a lifelong process of learning, self-reflection, and self-critique. To enhance the quality and the impact of our practices, we must prioritize cultural competence and humility and be mindful of the role of culture in the patient-provider-system interactions, in our larger healthcare systems, and in our research agendas and workforce development.

Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action

This paper provides an overview of the scientific evidence pointing to critically needed steps to reduce racial inequities in health. First, it argues that communities of opportunity should be developed to minimize some of the adverse impacts of systemic racism. These are communities that provide early childhood development resources, implement policies to reduce childhood poverty, provide work and income support opportunities for adults, and ensure healthy housing and neighborhood conditions. Second, the healthcare system needs new emphases on ensuring access to high quality care for all, strengthening preventive health care approaches, addressing patients’ social needs as part of healthcare delivery, and diversifying the healthcare work force to more closely reflect the demographic composition of the patient population. Finally, new research is needed to identify the optimal strategies to build political will and support to address social inequities in health. This will include initiatives to raise awareness levels of the pervasiveness of inequities in health, build empathy and support for addressing inequities, enhance the capacity of individuals and communities to actively participate in intervention efforts and implement large scale efforts to reduce racial prejudice, ideologies, and stereotypes in the larger culture that undergird policy preferences that initiate and sustain inequities.