[Löfgren syndrome: a study of 80 cases]

Sarcoidosis with musculoskeletal manifestations: systematic review of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments

We aimed to summarise effects and use of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments for sarcoidosis with musculoskeletal manifestations. We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, Scopus, clinical.trials.gov, PROSPERO and PEDro for systematic reviews from 2014 to 2022 and for primary studies from date of inception to March 29, 2022, and studies with patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis with musculoskeletal manifestations. Inclusion criteria required that studies reported effects of non-pharmacological and/or pharmacological treatments or number of patients receiving these treatments. Results were reported narratively and in forest plots. Eleven studies were included. No systematic reviews fulfilled our inclusion criteria. None of the included studies had a control group. We found that between 23 and 100% received corticosteroids, 0-100% received NSAIDs, 5-100% received hydroxychloroquine, 12-100% received methotrexate, 0-100% received TNF inhibitors, and 3-4% received azathioprine. Only ten patients in one study had used non-pharmacological treatments, including occupational therapy, chiropractic and acupuncture. There are no controlled studies on treatment effects for patients with sarcoidosis with musculoskeletal manifestations. We found 11 studies reporting use of pharmacological treatments and only one study reporting use of non-pharmacological treatments. Our study identified major research gaps for pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment in musculoskeletal sarcoidosis and warrant randomised clinical trials for both.

First Report of Two Cases of Löfgren's Syndrome after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination-Coincidence or Causality?

Sarcoidosis can present as an acute form or take a chronic course. One of the acute presentations is Löfgren’s syndrome (LS), consisting of the symptom triad of bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, erythema nodosum, and ankle periarthritis. In addition, there are occasional reports of sarcoid-like reactions following drug exposures. Nevertheless, reports of sarcoidosis or LS after vaccination have not been published. Here, we report two cases of de novo LS in a temporal association with different vaccines against the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. One patient developed the first symptoms three days after the second vaccination (first vaccination ChadOx-1, Astra Zeneca; second vaccination CX-024414, Moderna); in the second patient, symptoms started 28 days after the first vaccination (ChadOx-1, Astra Zeneca). Both patients eventually required treatment with glucocorticoids. Both patients achieved clinical improvement with treatment. In conclusion, we report the first two cases of LS shortly after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Sarcoidosis presenting with and without Löfgren's syndrome: Clinical, radiological and behavioral differences observed in a group of 691patients

OBJECTIVES

Just a few series of Löfgren's syndrome have been reported. Our aim was to describe the epidemiology and clinical profile of sarcoidosis patients presenting with Löfgren's syndrome vs. non-Löfgren's syndrome.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 691consecutive patients with sarcoidosis diagnosed at the Bellvitge University Hospital in Barcelona, Spain, between 1976 and 2018.

RESULTS

Three hundred and nine patients (44.7%) were diagnosed with Löfgren's syndrome and 382with non-Löfgren's syndrome (55.3%). The mean age at diagnosis was 39.8years-old (SD 11.7) vs. 46.6 (SD 14.5) (P<0.001). 249 patients (80.6%) vs. 218 (57.1%) were female (P<0.001), and mostly Caucasians (304, 98.4% vs. 351, 91.9%, P=0.002). Out of the total 309, Löfgren's syndrome patients developed more frequently fever and articular involvement, and 45 (14.6%) presented with isolated periarticular ankle inflammation. When compared, radiological stages at diagnosis were more advanced in non-Löfgren's syndrome patients: stage 0 (2.9% vs. 14.7%), stage I (82.5% vs. 41.4%), stage II (14.6% vs. 29.3%), and stage III/IV (0 vs. 14.7%) (P<0.001). Chronic trend>2years was more prevalent in non-Löfgren's syndrome (66, 22.6% vs. 233, 67.4%; P<0.001), as well as the proportion of patients in whom treatment was needed (58, 18.8% vs. 224, 58.6%; P<0.001). Risk factors related to chronic trend>2 years were older age, stage II at diagnosis and the need of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Löfgren's syndrome is a well-differentiated form of sarcoidosis with persuasive different epidemiological, clinical, radiological and prognostic features.

Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: Prognostic Factors at Diagnosis in Patients from North of Portugal

BACKGROUND

Sarcoidosis is a multisystemic granulomatous disease that affects the lungs in more than 90% of the patients. It is associated with a variable clinical course and considering all the different forms of disease presentation, there are an absence of reliable clinical prognostic markers that can predict the outcome at diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to investigate prognostic factors at diagnosis in a population of sarcoidosis patients from Northern Portugal.

METHODS

A group of 110 patients with chronic evolution was compared with 129 patients with disease resolution regarding their clinical, radiologic and laboratorial features.

RESULTS

We found a positive association between the chronic forms and lung function impairment, radiologic stage II, lower lymphocyte CD4/CD8 and extrapulmonary disease. Löfgren syndrome and asthenia instead had a protective significant association to chronicity. Our final logistic regression model found a significant independent association between age (adjusted OR=1.06), extrapulmonary involvement (adjusted OR=2.68), Löfgren's syndrome (adjusted OR=0.15) with outcome toward chronicity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first study searching for prognostic factors at diagnosis in a Northern Portuguese population, we found clinical prognosis factors that have been described in other populations that should be considered whenever sarcoidosis is identified.

[Musculoskeletal manifestations of sarcoidosis]

Musculoskeletal manifestations in the context of sarcoidosis are frequently observed. The rheumatologist regularly encounters this disease in clinical practice. In the present review, we aim to give a current overview of the manifestations and treatments relevant to the practicing rheumatologist. The most frequently encountered manifestation is Lofgren's syndrome, which is characterized by bilateral ankle periarthritis, bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, and erythema nodosum and has an excellent prognosis. Chronic arthropathy most commonly manifests as oligoarthritis, which sometimes hampers its differentiation from spondylarthropathies, especially when sacroiliitis, enthesitis or dactylitis are simultaneously present. Isolated vertebral granulomas are rare and require infectious and malignant disorders to be excluded, since there are no specific imaging findings that are exclusively found in vertebral sarcoidosis. The presence of granulomas in skeletal muscle is common in muscle biopsies, whereas clinically overt myopathy is present in only around 1-2% of patients. Therapeutic responses vary among the different clinical phenotypes. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and low to medium dose glucocorticoids are the first-line therapy for musculoskeletal manifestations and often lead to adequate disease control in acute sarcoidosis. When these are ineffective or not tolerated, steroid-sparing agents are increasingly used in chronic sarcoidosis. Evidence for all medications used in sarcoid-related arthritis is comparatively scant. When supplementing vitamin D, the possible development of hypercalcemia, even at standard doses, needs to be considered; the optimal therapeutic levels for the prevention of medication-induced osteoporosis in sarcoidosis have not been firmly established.

Management of extrapulmonary sarcoidosis: challenges and solutions

Background

Sarcoidosis is a chronic multisystem disease of unknown etiology characterized by noncaseating granulomas that most often involves the lungs, but frequently has extrapulmonary manifestations, which might be difficult to treat in individual patients.

Objective

To review different disease manifestations, focusing on extrapulmonary organ systems, and to provide treatment options for refractory cases.

Materials and methods

We performed a literature search using Medline and Google Scholar for individual or combined keywords of “sarcoidosis, extrapulmonary, treatment, kidney, neurosarcoidosis, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, transplantation, musculoskeletal, rheumatology, arthritis, and skin”. Peer-reviewed articles, including review articles, clinical trials, observational trials, and case reports that were published in English were included. References from retrieved articles were also manually searched for relevant articles.

Results and conclusion

Isolated involvement of a single organ or organ system is rare in sarcoidosis, and thus all patients must be thoroughly evaluated for additional disease manifestations. Cardiac sarcoidosis and neurosarcoidosis may be life-threatening. Clinicians need to assess patients comprehensively using clinical, laboratory, imaging, and histopathological data to recommend competently the best and least toxic treatment option for the individual patient.