Evaluation of a thermoplastic immobilization system for breast and chest wall radiation therapy

Impact of belly board immobilization devices and body mass factor on setup displacement using daily cone-beam CT in rectal cancer radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of different belly board and daily changes in patient's body-mass factor (BMF) on setup displacement in radiotherapy for rectal cancer.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients were immobilized using the thermoplastic mask with belly board (TM-BB), and 30 used the vacuum bag cushion with belly board (VBC-BB), performing daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans 625 times and 750 times, respectively. Daily pretreatment CBCT scans were registered to the planned CT images for BMF change determination and setup displacement measurement. Independent t-tests compared setup displacement between the two groups in left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions, as well as the BMF changes. The impact of daily BMF changes on setup displacement was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression and 10-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS

The setup displacement for TM-BB in the LR, SI, and AP directions were 0.31 ± 0.25, 0.58 ± 0.40, and 0.19 ± 0.18 cm, respectively, while VBC-BB showed 0.19 ± 0.15, 0.26 ± 0.22, and 0.36 ± 0.29 cm in the corresponding directions, respectively. Margins of planning target volume (PTV) for TM-BB were 8, 10, and 6 mm in LR, SI, and AP directions, while VBC-BB showed margins of 5,7, and 8 mm, respectively. The daily BMF changes for both groups were ranked in descending order as follows: sacral rotation angle (RS), hip lateral diameter (HLD), and hip anterior-posterior diameter (HAPD). HAPD was the main factor affecting setup displacement in both the AP and SI directions in TM-BB, while RS was the primary factor for setup displacement in the AP direction in VBC-BB.

CONCLUSION

Compared with TM-BB, VBC-BB had a larger AP displacement but smaller in LR and SI displacement. Daily changes in BMF have distinct effects on setup displacement in different immobilization devices. Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) is highly recommended and BMF changes should be given consideration during radiotherapy.

The impact of bolus on clinical outcomes for post-mastectomy breast cancer patients treated with IMRT: data from China

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate the effects of chest wall bolus in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technology on clinical outcomes for post-mastectomy breast cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with invasive carcinoma ((y)pT0-4, (y)pN0-3) who received photon IMRT after mastectomy at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from 2014 to 2019. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received daily bolus application or not, and the baseline characteristics were matched using propensity score matching (PSM). Cumulative incidence (CI) of local recurrence (LR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated with a log-rank test. Acute skin toxicity and late radiation pneumonia was analyzed using chi-square test.

RESULTS

A total of 529 patients were included in this study, among whom 254 (48%) patients received bolus application. The median follow-up time was 60 months. After matching, 175 well-paired patients were selected. The adjusted 5-year outcomes (95% confidence interval) in patients treated with and without bolus were, respectively: CI of LR 2.42% (0.04-4.74) versus 2.38% (0.05-4.65), CI of LRR 2.42% (0.04-4.74) versus 3.59% (0.73-6.37), DFS 88.12% (83.35-93.18) versus 84.69% (79.42-90.30), OS 94.21% (90.79-97.76) versus 95.86% (92.91-98.91). No correlation between bolus application and skin toxicity (P = 0.555) and late pneumonia (P = 0.333) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The study revealed a low recurrence rate using IMRT technology. The daily used 5 mm chest wall bolus was not associated with improved clinical outcomes.

A Randomised Clinical Feasibility Trial of a Breast Immobilisation Device: The SuPPORT 4 All Bra

AIMS

Despite the breast being a mobile organ, there is currently no standard suitable immobilisation device to optimise radiotherapy for women with larger breasts treated after a wide local excision. The SuPPORT 4 All (S4A) bra was co-designed with patients and radiotherapy professionals. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of using the S4A bra in the existing breast cancer radiotherapy pathway.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomised feasibility trial was conducted in a single institution; the primary feasibility endpoint was the recruitment of 50 participants. Efficacy endpoints were also tested, including assessment of skin reactions, dose to organs at risk and patient comfort. Fifty women were randomised to receive either standard radiotherapy with no immobilisation (control) or radiotherapy with the S4A bra (intervention). A separate planning study was undertaken on the cases randomised to receive the S4A bra. Participants in the intervention arm (S4A bra) underwent two planning computed tomography scans, one with the bra on and one without the bra; allowing direct comparison of organs at risk data for S4A bra versus no bra.

RESULTS

All women who started radiotherapy wearing the S4A bra completed treatment with the bra; patient comfort did not change across the 3 weeks of treatment. Positional accuracy using the bra was comparable with existing published accuracy for methods without immobilisation. The mean ipsilateral lung doses showed some improvement when positioning with the S4A bra was compared with the no bra set-up (3.72 Gy versus 4.85 Gy for right-sided cases, 3.23 Gy versus 3.62 Gy for left-sided cases).

CONCLUSIONS

The S4A bra is feasible to use in the radiotherapy pathway with good patient adherence. The S4A bra has potential to reduce dose to organs at risk (specifically ipsilateral lung dose) while maintaining good breast tissue coverage, and improved patient dignity, warranting further investigation on a larger scale.

Development of a novel airbag system of abdominal compression for reducing respiratory motion: preliminary results in healthy volunteers

This study used cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel airbag system combined with a shell-type body fixation system in reducing respiratory motion in normal volunteers. The airbag system consists of a six-sided polygon inflatable airbag, a same shape plate, a stiff air supply tube, an air-supply pump and a digital pressure load cell monitor. Piezoelectric sensors were installed in the plate to detect compression pressure load changes; pressure load data were transferred to the digital pressure load cell monitor through Bluetooth. Five volunteers underwent cine-MRI with and without airbag compression to detect differences in the respiratory motion of the organs. The volunteers' physiologic signs were stable during the experiment. The maximum inspiration pressure load was 4.48 ± 0.86 kgf (range, 4.00-6.00 kgf), while the minimum expiration pressure load was 3.69 ± 0.95 kgf (range, 2.8-5.3 kgf). Under airbag compression, the right diaphragm movement was reduced from 19.50 ± 6.43 mm to 9.60 ± 3.61 mm (P < 0.05) in the coronal plane and 23.12 ± 6.30 mm to 11.00 ± 3.69 mm (P < 0.05) in the sagittal plane. The left diaphragm, pancreas and liver in the coronal plane and the right kidney and liver in the sagittal plane also showed significant movement reduction. This novel airbag abdominal compression system was found to be safe during the experiment and successful in the reduction of internal organ respiratory motion and promises to be a convenient and efficient tool for clinical radiotherapy.

Analysis of local setup errors of sub-regions in cone-beam CT-guided post-mastectomy radiation therapy

The purpose of the study was to quantify local setup errors and evaluate the planning target volume (PTV) margins for sub-regions in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). The local setup errors of 20 patients undergoing CBCT-guided PMRT were analysed retrospectively. Image registration between CBCT and planning CT was performed using four sub-regions of interest (ROIs): the supraclavicular area (S_ROI), ipsilateral chest wall region (C_ROI), ipsilateral chest wall plus supraclavicular region (S_ROI + C_ROI) and vertebral region (T_ROI). Bland–Altman analysis, correlation, local setup errors and PTV margins among these ROIs were evaluated. There was no significant consistency or correlation for registration results between the T_ROI and the C_ROI or S_ROI regions on any translational axis. When using the S_ROI + C_ROI as the ROI, the systematic error (Σ) and random error (σ) of the local setup errors for the C_ROI region were 1.81, 1.19 and 1.76 mm and 1.84, 2.64 and 3.00 mm along the medial–lateral (ML), superior–inferior (SI) and anterior–posterior (AP) directions, respectively. The PTV margins for the C_ROI region were 5.80, 4.82 and 6.50 mm. The Σ and σ of the local setup errors for the S_ROI region were 1.29, 1.15 and 0.77 mm and 1.96, 2.65 and 2.2 mm, respectively, and the PTV margins were 4.59, 4.73 and 3.47 mm. Large setup errors and local setup errors occur in PMRT. The vertebral body should not be a position surrogate for the supraclavicular region or chest wall. To compensate for the local setup errors, different PTV margins are required, even with CBCT guidance.

Characteristics of a bolus created using thermoplastic sheets for postmastectomy radiation therapy

This study applied a "shell bolus," an immobilizing thermoplastic shell locally thickened with extra layers over the radiation target, during postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). We performed ion chamber and film measurements for a solid water phantom for thermoplastic sheets and a gel bolus for dosimetric characterization using a 6-MV X-ray flattening-filter-free (FFF) beam. The air gaps between the body surface for the gel and shell bolus were measured using computed tomography (CT) images in patients who underwent PMRT. This included seven and 13 patients treated with the gel and shell boluses, respectively. A comparison of the dose differences between a 10-mm gel bolus and a 9.6-mm-thick thermoplastic sheet at the surface and 5 cm below the surface showed a 4.2% higher surface dose and 0.5% lower dose at 5-cm depth for the thermoplastic sheet compared to those for the gel bolus. The mean (p = 0.029) and maximum (p < 0.001) air gaps of the shell bolus were significantly thinner than those of the gel bolus. Thus, the shell bolus provided a close fit and robust bolus effect. In addition, the shell bolus reduced respiratory motion and eliminated the need for skin marking. Therefore, this system can be effectively used as a bolus for PMRT.

Comparing Accuracy of Thermoplastic Mask versus Commercial Bra for the Immobilization of Pendulous Breast During Radiation Therapy Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

This study aimed to compare thermoplastic mask with bra in terms of setup reproducibility and immobilization of pendulous breasts during radiation therapy (RT).

Methods and materials

Forty-two female patients with breast cancer treated with either intensity modulated RT or 3-dimensional conformal RT were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 21 benefited from thermoplastic mask immobilization and 21 used a bra. Setup accuracy was evaluated using consecutive cone beam computed tomography/electronic portal imaging device sessions over the first 3 days before treatment (systematic setting), followed by weekly cone beam computed tomography/electronic portal imaging device (random settings), and compared with the reference image to calculate the corresponding translational shift (setup error) in the 3 planes. Average absolute shift values in both systematic and random settings were compared between the 2 groups. Accuracy was analyzed by comparing the percentage of pooled settings within ±0.05 and ±0.1 cm of the reference image.

Results

Compared with a bra, use of the mask was associated with a smaller longitudinal shift in systematic settings (difference in mean: 0.27 cm; P = .027; Mann-Whitney U test) and a lesser lateral shift in random setting (difference in mean: 0.19 cm; P = .005; Mann-Whitney U test). In the pooled systematic settings, the mask performed relatively better than the bra in the lateral and longitudinal planes, with no statistical significance. In pooled random settings, mask showed greater accuracy than bra in the lateral plane with 86.0% versus 58.9% accuracy at ±0.5 cm (P < .001) and 48.8% versus 21.7% accuracy at ±0.1 cm (P < .001), respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of radiodermatitis between the 2 groups. However, a hypofractionation regimen was associated with a lower incidence of radiodermatitis, and the severity of skin reactions was positively correlated with treatment dose (unstandardized regression coefficient: B = .001; correlation coefficient: r = .571; P < .001).

Conclusions

Masks provide superior reproducibility compared with commercially available bras.

Comparison among four immobilization devices for whole breast irradiation with Helical Tomotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the repositioning accuracy of 4 immobilization devices (ID) used for whole breast Helical Tomotherapy treatments: arm float with VacFix® (Par Scientific, Denmark), all-in-one® (AIO®) system (Orfit, Belgium), MacroCast thermoplastic mask (Macromedics, The Netherlands) and BlueBag® system with Arm-Shuttle (Elekta, Sweden).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty four women with breast cancer with PTV including the breast/chest wall and lymph nodes were involved in this study (6 women per group). Pretreatment registration results were first collected using automatic bone registration + manual adjustment on the vertebra followed by independent registrations on different ROIs representing each treated area (axillary, mammary chain, clavicular, breast/chest wall). The differences in translations and rotations between reference registration and the above mentionned ROIs were calculated. A total of 120 MVCT images were analyzed.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found between IDs (p < 0.0001), ROIs (p = 0.0002) and the session number (p < 0.0001) on the observed shifts, when examining 3D translation vectors. 3D-vectors were significantly lower for the BlueBag® than for the VacFix® or for the AIO® (p < 0.0001), but differences were not significant compared to the mask (p = 0.674). Finally, setup margins were overall smaller for the BlueBag® than for other IDs, with values ranging from 1.53 to 1.91 mm on the mammary chain area, 4.52-6.07 mm on the clavicular area, 2.71-4.62 mm on the axillary area, and 3.39-5.10 mm on the breast.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated in this study that the BlueBag® combined with arm shuttle is a robust solution for breast and nodes immobilization during HT treatments.

Cardiac-sparing radiation therapy using positioning breast shell for patients with left-sided breast cancer who are ineligible for breath-hold techniques

Purpose

Patients with left-sided breast cancer (LSBC) are at increased risk of cardiac morbidity from adjuvant breast radiation therapy (ABRT). Breath-hold (BH) techniques substantially reduce the radiation received by heart during radiation therapy for LSBC. However, a subset of patients with LSBC are ineligible for BH techniques due to an inability to breath-hold or because of other comorbidities. To reduce radiation to the heart, we routinely use a custom-made breast shell for the treatment of patients with LSBC who are ineligible for BH techniques. This study evaluates the dosimetric impact of using a breast shell for patients with LSBC undergoing ABRT.

Methods and materials

Sixteen consecutive patients with LSBC who failed BH and underwent ABRT using a breast shell during the period of 2014 to 2016 were identified. Treatment was planned using field-in-field tangents with a prescribed dose of 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions. Comparisons between plans with and without a shell were made for each patient using a paired t test to quantify the sparing of organs at risk (OARs) and target coverage.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in the planning target volume of breast coverage. A statistically significant improvement was observed in sparing the heart, left ventricle (LV), and ipsilateral lung (P-value < .001). Plans with the shell spared OARs better than the no-shell plans with a mean dose of 2.15 Gy versus 5.15 Gy (58.2% reduction) to the heart, 3.27 Gy versus 9.00 Gy (63.7% reduction) to the LV, and 5.16 Gy versus 7.95 Gy (35% reduction) to the ipsilateral lung. The irradiated volumes of OARs for plans with and without shell are 13.3 cc versus 59.5 cc (77.6% reduction) for the heart, 6.2 cc versus 33.2 cc (81.2% reduction) for the LV, and 92.8 cc versus 162.5 cc (42.9% reduction) for the ipsilateral lung.

Conclusions

A positioning breast shell offers significant benefit in terms of sparing the heart for patients with LSBC who are ineligible for BH techniques. It also can be used as a simple cardiac-sparing alternative in centers without BH capability.

Helical Tomotherapy of the breast: can thermoplastic immobilization improve the reproducibility of the treatment setup and the accuracy of the delivered dose?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of thermoplastic mask immobilization in the setup reproducibility and delivered dose for Helical Tomotherapy (HT) of the breast/chest wall.

METHODS

16 patients treated with Accuray Hi-Art HT for breast-cancer were considered. Patients were positioned supine with arms extended above the head using Civco Wing Board (WB) system. In 50% of patients an Orfit thermoplastic mask was added in order to improve immobilization. Before each treatment fraction a megavoltage CT (MVCT) scan was taken and registered to the planning CT by experienced medical staff. The impact of thermoplastic mask was investigated analysing MVCT shift-roll data and MVCT dose distribution using Planned Adaptive software.

RESULTS

In the analysed cases, the addition of thermoplastic mask had minor impact on the lateral, longitudinal and roll data distribution. Variance of vertical shifts was significantly reduced in the WB + Orfit group. Van Herk's margins were not affected by addition of thermoplastic immobilization. In both groups, target coverage (V95) and maximum dose (D1) were almost identical to planned values. D1 of organs at risk were not significantly different in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of shift-roll data shows no improvement in the group of patients immobilized with the addition of thermoplastic mask. Van Herk's margin is quite large (7-10 mm) in both groups evidencing the need to perform daily setup correction. The adapted dose distribution complies well with the planned one, showing that if MVCT is used before each treatment fraction, a 3 mm margin (setup component) for CTVs expansion could be adequate.

Dosimetric effects of swelling or shrinking tissue during helical tomotherapy breast irradiation. A phantom study

During radiation therapy of the female breast, the actual target volume compared to the planning target volume may change due to swelling or shrinking of the tissue. Under‐ or overdosage is to be expected, especially when performing IMRT or tomotherapy techniques. The objective of this study is to develop a model‐based quantification of these dose effects, with a particular focus on the changes in the surface dose. A cylindrical phantom was used as an artificial surrogate of the human torso. By adding and removing Superflab layers of various thicknesses, both radial breast swelling and shrinking could be simulated. The effects on dose distribution were evaluated using film dosimetry. The results were compared to dose calculations. To estimate the true surface doses, we subtracted the influence of the film material on air measurements. During a swelling of 5, 10, and 15 mm, the planning target volume was consistently underdosed by 2%, 5%, and 7% of the prescribed dose, respectively. Swelling led to reduced dose values of up to 72%, 55%, and 50% at the outer edge of the actual target volume. The measured surface dose decreased successively from 31% to 23%. During shrinking, the dose in the planning target volume increased successively from 100% to 106%. The measured surface doses increased from 29% to 36%. The calculated dose values agreed with the measured values within error limits. During radiotherapy of the female breast, new planning appears to be essential for radial tissue swelling of 5 mm or more because of severe underdosing. Shrinking leads to moderate overdosing and an increased surface dose. In addition, caution is advised when removing bolus material with respect to the planned situation.

PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn, 87.55.dk, 87.55.D‐

Correlation between target motion and the dosimetric variance of breast and organ at risk during whole breast radiotherapy using 4DCT

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore the correlation between the respiration-induced target motion and volume variation with the dosimetric variance on breast and organ at risk (OAR) during free breathing.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

After breast-conserving surgery, seventeen patients underwent respiration-synchronized 4DCT simulation scans during free breathing. Treatment planning was constructed using the end inspiration scan, then copied and applied to the other phases and the dose distribution was calculated separately to evaluate the dose-volume histograms (DVH) parameters for the planning target volume (PTV), ipsilateral lung and heart.

RESULTS

During free breathing, the treated breast motion vector was 2.09 ± 0.74 mm, and the volume variation was 3.05 ± 0.94%. There was no correlation between the breast volume and target/OAR dosimetric variation (|r| = 0.39 ~ 0.48). In the anteroposterior, superoinferior and vector directions, breast movement correlated well with the mean PTV dose, conformal index, and the lung volume receiving high dose (|r| = 0.651-0.975); in the superoinferior and vector directions, breast displacement only correlated with the heart volume receiving >5 Gy (V5) (r = -0.795, 0.687). The lung volume and the lung volume receiving high dose correlated reasonably well (r = 0.655 ~ 0.882), and a correlation only existed between heart volume and V5 (r = -0.701).

CONCLUSION

Target movement correlated well with the target/OAR dosimetric variation in certain directions, indicating that whole breast IMRT assisted by breathing control or respiratory-adapted gated treatment promotes the accuracy of dose delivery during radiotherapy. During free breathing, the effect of breast volume variation can be ignored in whole breast IMRT.