Kilovoltage cone-beam CT imaging dose during breast radiotherapy: A dose comparison between a left and right breast setup

Impact of CBCT frequency on target coverage and dose to the organs at risk in adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy

The current study aims to assess the effect of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) frequency during adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) on target volume coverage and dose to the organs at risk (OAR). 50 breast cancer patients receiving either non-hypofractionated or hypofractionated radiotherapy after lumpectomy including a SIB to the tumor bed were selected for this study. All patients were treated in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique and underwent daily CBCT imaging. In order to estimate the delivered dose during the treatment, the applied fraction doses were recalculated on daily CBCT scans and accumulated using deformable image registration. Based on a total of 2440 dose recalculations, dose coverage in the clinical target volumes (CTV) and OAR was compared depending on the CBCT frequency. The estimated delivered dose (V95%) for breast-CTV and SIB-CTV was significantly lower than the planned dose distribution, irrespective of the CBCT-frequency. Between daily CBCT and CBCT on alternate days, no significant dose differences were found regarding V95% for both, breast-CTV and SIB-CTV. Dose distribution in the OAR was similar for both imaging protocols. Weekly CBCT though led to a significant decrease in dose coverage compared to daily CBCT and a small but significant dose increase in most OAR. Daily CBCT imaging might not be necessary to ensure adequate dose coverage in the target volumes while efficiently sparing the OAR during adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy with SIB.

Measurement of dose exposure of image guidance in external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation: Evaluation of different techniques and linear accelerators

INTRODUCTION

Verifying the patient position is always an essential part of the treatment process, especially in hypofractionated treatments such as accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). The purpose of the study was to compare five image guidance techniques with respect to imaging dose and image quality.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We chose five types of imaging methods applicable for APBI and measured their dose exposure on four different accelerators (Synergy, TrueBeam, Artiste and CyberKnife). Absorbed dose was measured with ionization chamber in thorax phantom. Besides dose exposure image quality was also compared.

RESULTS

The lowest dose exposure was measured with kV-kV planar imaging followed by kV-CBCT, MV-MV pair and MV-CBCT in ascending order. Average phantom dose with kV-kV image pair on CyberKnife was 0.01 cGy as the lowest and with MV-CBCT on Artiste was 7.11 cGy as the highest. Average dose exposures of MV-MV images with TrueBeam, Synergy and Artiste were 1.18 cGy, 2.13 cGy and 1.61 cGy, respectively, with similar image quality. For the same machines the doses of kV-CT imaging were comparable: 0.65 cGy, 0.65 cGy and 0.52 cGy, with some differences in image quality. MV-CBCT technique resulted in the highest dose and poorest image quality.

CONCLUSIONS

In APBI the position of the patient and tumour bed can be verified with many tools. When fiducials are available, often 2D imaging is enough to achieve appropriate positioning and the kV-kV method is recommended. Imaging with 2.5MV can also be a good solution instead of 6MV. Without fiducials 3D images should be acquired and the recommended method is the kV-CBCT.

Use of electronic portal images to evaluate setup error and intra-fraction motion during free-breathing breast IMRT treatment

Before delivering of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, kilo-voltage image-guidance radiotherapy is widely used in setup error correction and monitoring intra-fraction motion effectively. Accordingly, this study proposes and tests an image integration technique for observing intra-fraction motion during beam delivery, with the wider objective of reducing both image-guidance time and the dose delivered to normal breast tissue. The study sample comprised 33 female patients with breast cancer, and 241 sets of portal images acquired using a VARIAN aSi-1000 electronic portal imaging device. Motion amplitudes and vectors were collected and calculated separately by two senior therapists. The setup error in 3 axes was computed for every fraction, with average shifting for lateral, longitudinal and vertical direction was -0.3-mm ± 0.5, -0.1-mm ± 0.5 and -0.6-mm ± 1.6, with the average vector of setup error being 2.9-mm ± 1.4. The average intra-fraction motion for vertical direction was (A: -0.1-mm ± 1.0; B: -0.0 ± 1.1), for longitudinal was (A: -0.4-mm ± 1.7; B: 2.0 ± 1.1), and for lateral direction was (A: 0.3-mm ± 1.3; B: 0.2 ± 1.8). The average intra-fraction vector was 2.9-mm ± 1.3 for therapist A, and 3.4-mm ± 1.8 for therapist B. Offline Review commercial software was utilized for setup error and motion analysis, and data analysis and reliability testing were conducted with statistical package of the social sciences. Pearson correlations between the two therapists was moderate (0.59, p << 0.01), and the Cohen's kappa value for inter rater agreement between different evaluators was fair in the anterior-posterior direction (0.25, p << 0.01), with slight agreement in other two directions and vectors. The study presented efficient and dose reduction method to evaluate setup error and intra-fraction motion during breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment.

Risks and benefits of reducing target volume margins in breast tangent radiotherapy

This study investigates the potential benefits of planning target volume (PTV) margin reduction for whole breast radiotherapy in relation to dose received by organs at risk (OARs), as well as reductions in radiation-induced secondary cancer risk. Such benefits were compared to the increased radiation-induced secondary cancer risk attributed from increased ionizing radiation imaging doses. Ten retrospective patients' computed tomography datasets were considered. Three computerized treatment plans with varied PTV margins (0, 5 and 10 mm) were created for each patient complying with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 1005 protocol requirements. The BEIR VII lifetime attributable risk (LAR) model was used to estimate secondary cancer risk to OARs. The LAR was assessed for all treatment plans considering (a) doses from PTV margin variation and (b) doses from two (daily and weekly) kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (kV CBCT) imaging protocols during the course of treatment. We found PTV margins from largest to smallest resulted in a mean OAR relative dose reduction of 31% (heart), 28% (lung) and 23% (contralateral breast) and the risk of radiation-induced secondary cancer by a relative 23% (contralateral breast) and 22% (contralateral lung). Daily image-guidance using kV CBCT increased the risk of radiation induced secondary cancer to the contralateral breast and contralateral lung by a relative 1.6-1.9% and 1.9-2.5% respectively. Despite the additional dose from kV CBCT for the two considered imaging protocols, smaller PTV margins would still result in an overall reduction in secondary cancer risk.