1
|
Borm KJ, Junker Y, Düsberg M, Devečka M, Münch S, Dapper H, Oechsner M, Combs SE. Impact of CBCT frequency on target coverage and dose to the organs at risk in adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy. Sci Rep 2021; 11:17378. [PMID: 34462489 PMCID: PMC8405651 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96836-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The current study aims to assess the effect of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) frequency during adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) on target volume coverage and dose to the organs at risk (OAR). 50 breast cancer patients receiving either non-hypofractionated or hypofractionated radiotherapy after lumpectomy including a SIB to the tumor bed were selected for this study. All patients were treated in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique and underwent daily CBCT imaging. In order to estimate the delivered dose during the treatment, the applied fraction doses were recalculated on daily CBCT scans and accumulated using deformable image registration. Based on a total of 2440 dose recalculations, dose coverage in the clinical target volumes (CTV) and OAR was compared depending on the CBCT frequency. The estimated delivered dose (V95%) for breast-CTV and SIB-CTV was significantly lower than the planned dose distribution, irrespective of the CBCT-frequency. Between daily CBCT and CBCT on alternate days, no significant dose differences were found regarding V95% for both, breast-CTV and SIB-CTV. Dose distribution in the OAR was similar for both imaging protocols. Weekly CBCT though led to a significant decrease in dose coverage compared to daily CBCT and a small but significant dose increase in most OAR. Daily CBCT imaging might not be necessary to ensure adequate dose coverage in the target volumes while efficiently sparing the OAR during adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy with SIB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai J Borm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Medical School, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Yannis Junker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Medical School, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Düsberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Medical School, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Michal Devečka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Medical School, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Münch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Medical School, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Hendrik Dapper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Medical School, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Oechsner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Medical School, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Medical School, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium Für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK)-Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtzzentrum München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Münch S, Pigorsch SU, Devečka M, Dapper H, Feith M, Friess H, Weichert W, Jesinghaus M, Braren R, Combs SE, Habermehl D. Neoadjuvant versus definitive chemoradiation in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:66. [PMID: 30992022 PMCID: PMC6469104 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1270-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Multimodal treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (nCRT + S) is the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced or node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (E-SCC). Those who are unsuitable or who decline surgery can be treated with definitive chemoradiation (dCRT). This study compares the oncologic outcome of nCRT + S and dCRT in E-SCC patients. Methods Between 2011 and 2017, 95 patients with E-SCC were scheduled for dCRT or nCRT+ S with IMRT at our department. Patients undergoing dCRT received at least 50 Gy and those undergoing nCRT + S received at least 41.4 Gy. All patients received simultaneous chemotherapy with either carboplatin and paclitaxel or cisplatin and 5-fluoruracil. We retrospectively compared baseline characteristics and oncologic outcome including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and site of failure between both treatment groups. Results Patients undergoing dCRT were less likely to have clinically suspected lymph node metastases (85% vs. 100%, p = 0.019) than patients undergoing nCRT + S and had more proximally located tumors (median distance from dental arch to cranial tumor border 20 cm vs. 26 cm, p < 0.001). After a median follow up of 25.6 months for surviving patients, no significant differences for OS and PFS were noticed comparing nCRT + S and dCRT. However, the rate of local tumor recurrence was significantly higher in patients treated with dCRT than in those treated with nCRT + S (38% vs. 10%, p = 0.002). Within a multivariate Cox regression model, age, tumor location, and tumor grading were the only independent parameters affecting OS and PFS. In addition to that, proximal tumor location was the only parameter independently associated with an increased risk for local treatment failure. Conclusion In E-SCC patients treated with either dCRT or nCRT + S, a higher rate of local tumor recurrence was seen in patients treated with dCRT than in patients treated with nCRT + S. There was at least a trend towards an improved OS and PFS in patients undergoing nCRT + S. However, this should be interpreted with caution, because proximal tumor location was the only parameter independently affecting the risk of local tumor recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Münch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Steffi U Pigorsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Michal Devečka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Hendrik Dapper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Feith
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Helmut Friess
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Wilko Weichert
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz Jesinghaus
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Rickmer Braren
- Institute of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - Daniel Habermehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fuchs F, Habl G, Devečka M, Kampfer S, Combs SE, Kessel KA. Interfraction variation and dosimetric changes during image-guided radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients. Radiat Oncol J 2019; 37:127-133. [PMID: 31137087 PMCID: PMC6610012 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2018.00514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to identify volume changes and dose variations of rectum and bladder during radiation therapy in prostate cancer (PC) patients. Materials and Methods We analyzed 20 patients with PC treated with helical tomotherapy. Daily image guidance was performed. We re-contoured the entire bladder and rectum including its contents as well as the organ walls on megavoltage computed tomography once a week. Dose variations were analyzed by means of Dmedian, Dmean, Dmax, V10 to V75, as well as the organs at risk (OAR) volume. Further, we investigated the correlation between volume changes and changes in Dmean of OAR. Results During treatment, the rectal volume ranged from 62% to 223% of its initial volume, the bladder volume from 22% to 375%. The average Dmean ranged from 87% to 118% for the rectum and 58% to 160% for the bladder. The Pearson correlation coefficients between volume changes and corresponding changes in Dmean were -0.82 for the bladder and 0.52 for the rectum. The comparison of the dose wall histogram (DWH) and the dose volume histogram (DVH) showed that the DVH underestimates the percentage of the rectal and bladder volume exposed to the high dose region. Conclusion Relevant variations in the volume of OAR and corresponding dose variations can be observed. For the bladder, an increase in the volume generally leads to lower doses; for the rectum, the correlation is weaker. Having demonstrated remarkable differences in the dose distribution of the DWH and the DVH, the use of DWHs should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik Fuchs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | - Gregor Habl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | - Michal Devečka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | - Severin Kampfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Kerstin A Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Münch S, Pigorsch SU, Devečka M, Dapper H, Weichert W, Friess H, Braren R, Combs SE, Habermehl D. Comparison of definite chemoradiation therapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/5-fluoruracil in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:139. [PMID: 30068371 PMCID: PMC6090949 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1085-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) with subsequent surgery is the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced or node-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCC) suitable for surgery, patients who are unsuitable for surgery or who refuse surgery should be treated with definite chemoradiation therapy (dCRT). Purpose of this study was to compare toxicity and oncologic outcome of dCRT with either cisplatin and 5-fluoruracil (CDDP/5FU) or carboplatin and paclitaxel (Carb/TAX) in patients with SCC. Methods Twenty-two patients who received dCRT with carboplatin (AUC2, weekly) and paclitaxel (50 mg per square meter of body-surface area, weekly) were retrospectively compared to 25 patients who were scheduled for dCRT with cisplatin (20 mg/m2/d) and 5-fluoruracil (500 mg/m2/d) on day 1–5 and day 29–33. For the per-protocol (PP) analysis, PP treatment was defined as complete radiation therapy with at least 54Gy and at least three complete cycles of Carb/TAX or complete radiation therapy with at least 54Gy and at least one complete cycle of CDDP/5FU. While patients who were scheduled for dCRT with Carb/TAX received a significantly higher total radiation dose (median dose 59.4Gy vs. 54Gy, p < 0.001) than patients who were scheduled for dCRT with CDDP/5FU, no significant differences were seen for other parameters (age, sex, TNM-stage, grading and tumor extension). Results Forty-seven patients (25 patients treated with CDDP/5FU and 22 patients treated with Carb/TAX) were evaluated for the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and 41 of 47 patients (23 patients treated with CDDP/5FU and 18 patients treated with Carb/TAX) were evaluated for the PP analysis. Severe myelotoxicity (≥ III°) was seen in 52% (CDDP/5FU) and 55% of patients (Carb/TAX), respectively (p = 1.000). In the univariate binary logistic regression analysis, patients age was the only factor associated with an increased risk of ≥ III° myelotoxicity (hazard ratio 1.145, 95% CI 1.035; 1.266; p = 0.009). Regarding treatment efficiency, no significant differences were seen for overall survival (OS) and freedom from relapse (FFR) between both treatment groups. Conclusion Myelotoxicity and oncologic outcome under dCRT were not different for patients with SCC of the esophagus treated with either CDDP/5FU or Carb/TAX. The putative equivalence of dCRT with Carb/TAX in this setting should be further investigated in prospective trials. However, our data reveal that the risk of significant myelotoxicity increases with patient age and therefore other chemotherapy regimens might be evaluated in elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Münch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Steffi U Pigorsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michal Devečka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Hendrik Dapper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Wilko Weichert
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Helmut Friess
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Rickmer Braren
- Institute of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, D-85764, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Habermehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|