Role of belly board device in the age of intensity modulated radiotherapy for pelvic irradiation

Radiation-Induced Intestinal Injury: Injury Mechanism and Potential Treatment Strategies

Radiation-induced intestinal injury (RIII) is one of the most common intestinal complications caused by radiotherapy for pelvic and abdominal tumors and it seriously affects the quality of life of patients. However, the treatment of acute RIII is essentially symptomatic and nutritional support treatment and an ideal means of prevention and treatment is lacking. Researchers have conducted studies at the cellular and animal levels and found that some chemical or biological agents have good therapeutic effects on RIII and may be used as potential candidates for clinical treatment. This article reviews the injury mechanism and potential treatment strategies based on cellular and animal experiments to provide new ideas for the diagnosis and treatment of RIII in clinical settings.

Dose-volume parameters comparison of organs at risk between the prone and supine positions in pelvic tumors using 3D-CRT

AIMS

Cancer is a major public health problem worldwide, the leading cause of death in developed countries. Radiotherapy is an important treatment for many malignancies. The main purpose of this study was to compare the two techniques of supine and prone in prostate and rectal cancers using DVH extraction parameters.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

Clinical and dosimetry data of 41 rectal and prostate cancer patients were evaluated in both the supine and prone positions with belly board. Administered dose was daily 180 cGy. The four box fields in the first phase and two lateral fields in the second phase with 18 MV photon fields were used. Each patient underwent CT scan, at both the positions using a contrast agent with a full bladder.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

By using IBM SPSS software v23, all the data were described. The normal distribution of the data was performed using the KS sample statistical test. For data analysis, paired t test was used in the normal data and the Wilcoxon test was used in the non-normal data.

RESULTS

In patients with rectal cancer, there is no change in the received minimum dose by organs at risk. A significant decrease in received maximum dose, except for the prostate organ, could be due to the spatial proximity of the two organs to each other. Also, the received average dose in the small intestine was significantly reduced (P = 0.005). But in other organs, the dose reduction was not significant. In patients with prostate cancer, there is no change in the received minimum dose by OARs, except for the bladder organ (P = 0.003). Except the bladder organs (P = 0.011), there is no significant decrease in the received average dose by OARs. The maximum dose of the OARs is significantly reduced, except for the colon where there was not much overlap in the PTV, in addition to receiving the dose in the range. There was no significant relationship between CI in the rectal field and UI in the prostate field (P > 0.05), but there was a significant relationship between CI in the prostate field and UI in the rectal field with change in patient position.

CONCLUSIONS

In the prone position, in both patients' groups, the OARs receive an optimal and better dose than the supine position, especially the small intestine organ in the rectal field and the bladder and rectum organs in the prostate field. However, it seems that this change in the position of rectal cancer patients is ineffective in reducing the dose of prostate and needs further investigation.

Radiotherapy based management during Covid-19 pandemic - A systematic review of presented consensus and guidelines

Treatment management of cancer patients in the radiation oncology departments during the current COVID-19 pandemic is challenging. A systematic review of published consensus/guidelines on the role of radiotherapy prioritization, suggested treatment protocols, and set up management was undertaken based on the PRISMA protocol and through PubMed/PMC, Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science databases until 01/20/2021. One hundred and sixty-eight publications or regional consensus were included. Summary of recommendations contained: (1) using hypo-fractionated (Hypo-F) regimens for therapeutic/palliative indications, (2) delaying radiotherapy for several weeks or until pandemic over, (3) omitting radiotherapy by replacement of alternative therapies or active surveillance, (4) applying safer patients' setup and preparation protocols, (5) developing telemedicine/telehealth service. To conclude, it is essential to carefully weigh the risk of exposure to COVID-19 infection and the benefit of treating cancer patients during the pandemic. Trying to have a global guideline facing this or any other probable crisis is crucial for health care service.

A critical literature review on the use of bellyboard devices to control small bowel dose for pelvic radiotherapy

Delivering curative radiotherapy doses for rectal and gynaecological tumours has historically been complicated by the dose tolerance of the small bowel. Acute radiation-induced small bowel toxicity includes side effects such as abdominal pain, nausea and diarrhoea. With the advent of new treatment delivery modalities, such as IMRT (Intensity modulated radiotherapy) and VMAT (Volumetric modulated Arc radiotherapy), there has been an expectation that small bowel doses can be better controlled with the use of these technologies. These capabilities enable the creation of treatment plans that can better avoid critical radiosensitive organs. The purpose of this review is to look beyond advances in linear accelerator technology in seeking improvements to small bowel dose and toxicity. This review examines whether an alternative prone patient positioning approach using a bellyboard device in conjunction with IMRT and VMAT treatment delivery can reduce small bowel doses further than using these technologies with the patient in a traditional supine position.