Novel imaging approaches to screen for breast cancer: Recent advances and future prospects

Does MRI have added value in ultrasound-detected BIRADS-3 breast masses in candidates for assisted reproductive therapy?

Background

Ultrasound-detected breast lesions with probably benign features are a great challenge for clinicians, especially in breasts with dense composition. We aimed to investigate the finding of two radiologic modalities on these lesions.

Methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study recruited patients including (1) candidates of assisted reproductive therapy (ART), (2) patients with prior high-risk lesions, and (3) the "suspected" BIRADS-3 masses referring to masses that US BIRADS-3 was not compatible with the clinical breast exam. The degree of agreement in diagnosing BIRADS-3 lesions between two modalities of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US), and comparison of the lesions in US and MRI were the study variables.

Results

A total number of 123 lesions in 67 patients with a median age of 38 (IQR: 11, range: 17-67). In the examination by MRI, 107 (87.0 %) lesions were BIRADS-3 indicating the agreement level between these two modalities. The median size of the lesions in US was 9 mm (IQR: 5, range: 3-43) and 9 mm (IQR: 10, range: 4-46) in MRI. The measured size of the lesions between the two modalities was highly correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient: 0.889, P-value < 0.001). MRI evaluation revealed two cases of deep lesions which were missed in the US imaging.

Conclusions

This study found relatively high agreement values between US and MRI in detecting BIRADS-3 breast lesions in candidates for ART or patients with prior high-risk lesions. Also, MRI could downgrade about one-tenth of the cases to a lower BIRADS level and resolved the need for closer follow-up.

Actuated Reflector-Based 3-D Ultrasound Imaging With Synthetic Aperture Focusing

The 3-D ultrasound (US) imaging addresses the limitation in field-of-view (FOV) in conventional 2-D US imaging by providing 3-D viewing of the anatomy. The 3-D US imaging has been extensively adapted for diagnosis and image-guided surgical intervention. However, conventional approaches to implement 3-D US imaging require either expensive and sophisticated 2-D array transducers or external actuation mechanisms to move a 1-D array mechanically. Here, we propose a 3-D US imaging mechanism using an actuated acoustic reflector instead of the sensor elements for volume acquisition with significantly extended 3-D FOV, which can be implemented with simple hardware and compact size. To improve image quality on the elevation plane, we implemented the synthetic aperture focusing (SAF) method according to the diagonal geometry of the virtual element array in the proposed imaging mechanism for elevation beamforming. We first evaluated the proposed imaging mechanism and SAF with simulated point targets and cyst targets. The results of point targets suggested improved image quality on the elevation plane, and the results of cysts targets demonstrated a potential to improve 3-D visualization of human anatomy. We built a prototype imaging system with a 3-D FOV of 38 mm (lateral) by 38 mm (elevation) by 50 mm (axial) and collected data in imaging experiments with phantoms. Experimental data showed consistency with simulation results. The SAF method enhanced quantifying the cyst volume size in the breast mimicking phantom compared with no elevation beamforming. These results suggested that the proposed 3-D US imaging mechanism could potentially be applied in clinical scenarios.

Breast imaging: Beyond the detection

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease nowadays, including different biological subtypes with a variety of possible treatments, which aim to achieve the best outcome in terms of response to therapy and overall survival. In recent years breast imaging has evolved considerably, and the ultimate goal is to predict these strong phenotypic differences noninvasively. Indeed, breast cancer multiparametric studies can highlight not only qualitative imaging parameters, as the presence/absence of a likely malignant finding, but also quantitative parameters, suggesting clinical-pathological features through the evaluation of imaging biomarkers. A further step has been the introduction of artificial intelligence and in particular radiogenomics, that investigates the relationship between breast cancer imaging characteristics and tumor molecular, genomic and proliferation features. In this review, we discuss the main techniques currently in use for breast imaging, their respective fields of use and their technological and diagnostic innovations.

Dedicated breast CT: state of the art-Part II. Clinical application and future outlook

Dedicated breast CT is being increasingly used for breast imaging. This technique provides images with no compression, removal of tissue overlap, rapid acquisition, and available simultaneous assessment of microcalcifications and contrast enhancement. In this second installment in a 2-part review, the current status of clinical applications and ongoing efforts to develop new imaging systems are discussed, with particular emphasis on how to achieve optimized practice including lesion detection and characterization, response to therapy monitoring, density assessment, intervention, and implant evaluation. The potential for future screening with breast CT is also addressed. KEY POINTS: • Dedicated breast CT is an emerging modality with enormous potential in the future of breast imaging by addressing numerous clinical needs from diagnosis to treatment. • Breast CT shows either noninferiority or superiority with mammography and numerical comparability to MRI after contrast administration in diagnostic statistics, demonstrates excellent performance in lesion characterization, density assessment, and intervention, and exhibits promise in implant evaluation, while potential application to breast cancer screening is still controversial. • New imaging modalities such as phase-contrast breast CT, spectral breast CT, and hybrid imaging are in the progress of R & D.

[Connected bras for breast cancer detection in 2021: Analysis and perspectives]

OBJECTIVES

Breast cancer is the leading cancer in women worldwide with about 2 million new cases and 685,000 deaths each year. Mammography is the most widely used screening and diagnostic method. Currently, digital technologies advances facilitate the development of connected and portable devices. To overcome some of the disadvantages of mammography (breast compression, difficulty in analyzing dense breasts, radiation, limited accessibility in some countries, etc.), portable devices, conventionally known as connected bras (CB), have been created to offer an alternative method to mammography. The objective of our review was to list all the published CBs in order to know their main characteristics, their potential indications and their possible limitations.

METHOD

A bibliographical search in the PUBMED database selecting only articles written in French or English, between 2011 and 2020, found 7 CBs under development.

RESULTS

These CBs use thermal, ultrasonic and impedance sensors. Their advantages are an absence of irradiation, an absence of breast compression and a flexibility of use (outside an X-ray cabinet). Mammary gland analysis times vary, depending on the device, between 30min and 24h. They are all connected to data transmission systems and models that analyze the results.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

These CBs are mostly still undergoing clinical validation (only [iTBra] has been evaluated in a clinical trial) and require evaluation steps that will eventually allow their future use for breast cancer detection in high-risk women, particularly in women with dense breasts and in women between screening waves.

Comparison of Mortality Among Participants of Women's Health Initiative Trials With Screening-Detected Breast Cancers vs Interval Breast Cancers

IMPORTANCE

Interval breast cancers (IBCs) are cancers that emerge after a mammogram with negative results but before the patient's next scheduled screening. Interval breast cancer has a worse prognosis than cancers detected by screening; however, it is unknown whether the length of the interscreening period is associated with prognostic features and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prognostic features and mortality rate of women with IBCs diagnosed within 1 year or between 1 and 2.5 years of a mammogram with negative results with the prognostic features and mortality rate of women with breast cancers detected by screening.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study used mammography data, tumor characteristics, and patient demographic data from the Women's Health Initiative study, which recruited participants from 1993 to 1998 and followed up with participants for a median of 19 years. The present study sample for these analyses included women aged 50 to 79 years who participated in the Women's Health Initiative study and includes data collected through March 31, 2018. There were 5455 incidents of breast cancer; only 3019 women compliant with screening were retained in analyses. Statistical analysis was performed from October 25, 2018, to November 24, 2019. Breast cancers detected by screening and IBCs were defined based on mammogram history, date of last mammogram, type of visit, and results of examination. Interval breast cancers were subdivided into those occurring within 1 year or between 1 and 2.5 years after the last protocol-mandated mammogram with negative results.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome of this study was breast cancer-specific mortality for each case of breast cancer detected by screening and IBCs detected within 1 year or between 1 and 2.5 years from a mammogram with negative results. Secondary outcomes included prognostic and tumor characteristics for each group. Comparisons between groups were made using the t test, the χ2 test, and Fine-Gray multivariable cumulative incidence regression analyses.

RESULTS

Among the 3019 participants in this analysis, all were women with a mean (SD) age of 63.1 (6.8) years at enrollment and 68.5 (7.1) years at diagnosis. A total of 1050 cases of IBC were identified, with 324 (30.9%) diagnosed within 1 year from a mammogram with negative results and 726 (69.1%) diagnosed between 1 and 2.5 years after last mammogram with negative results. The remaining 1969 cases were breast cancers detected by screening. Interval breast cancers diagnosed within 1 year from a mammogram with negative results had significantly more lobular histologic characteristics (13.0% vs. 8.1%), a larger tumor size (1.97 cm vs 1.43 cm), a higher clinical stage (28.4% vs 17.3% regional and 3.7% vs 0.6% distant), and more lymph node involvement (27.1% vs 17.0%) than cancers detected by screening. Unadjusted breast cancer-specific mortality hazard ratios were significantly higher for IBCs diagnosed within 1 year from a mammogram with negative results compared with breast cancers detected by screening (hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.39-2.65). Higher breast cancer-specific mortality remained statistically significant for IBCs diagnosed within 1 year after adjusting for trial group, molecular subtype, waist to hip ratio, histologic characteristics, and either tumor size (hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.03-2.08) or lymph node involvement (hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.03-2.01). However, significance was lost when tumor size and lymph node involvement were both included in the model (hazard ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.96-1.88). Interval breast cancers diagnosed between 1 and 2.5 years from a mammogram with negative results were not different from breast cancers detected by screening based on prognostic factors or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Women with IBCs diagnosed within 1 year of negative mammogram results overall were associated with worse survival than women with breast cancers detected by screening. These differences in survival may be due to a uniquely aggressive biology among IBC cases.

Efficacy of shear-wave elastography versus dynamic optical breast imaging for predicting the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

PURPOSE

Explore the value of shear-wave elastography (SWE) parameters and dynamic optical breast imaging features for predicting pathological responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in breast cancer (BC).

METHOD

This prospective cohort study included 91 BC patients receiving NACT. Tumor size, SWE (maximum stiffness [Emax] and mean stiffness [Emean]), blood score (BS), and oxygen score (OS) and their relative changes were collected before (t0), during (t1-t5), and after NACT (t6). The pathological response was classified according to the residual cancer burden. Relationships between tumor size, SWE stiffness, BS, and OS at t0-t6 were analyzed, and their predictive power was compared.

RESULTS

During six NACT cycles, tumor size, tumor stiffness, and BS decreased, and tumor OS increased. ΔEmean (t2), E2mean, BS2, and OS2 had a greater power than other indexes for predicting a favorable response (AUC = 0.79, 0.71, 0.77, 0.78) and a resistance response (0.86, 0.74, 0.71, 0.71). For the favorable response, predictive power did not differ significantly between ΔEmean (t2), E2mean, BS2, and OS2, whereas for the resistance response, ΔEmean (t2) showed better prediction than E2mean, BS2, and OS2.

CONCLUSIONS

SWE stiffness, BS, and OS exhibited good and similar performances in predicting a NACT favorable response, and SWE stiffness showed better performance than BS and OS in predicting NACT resistance. These results may provide an important reference for individualized treatment in BC patients receiving NACT.