Incidencia, características y evolución del barotrauma durante la ventilación mecánica con apertura pulmonar

COVID-19-associated lung weakness (CALW): Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess mortality and different clinical factors derived from the development of atraumatic pneumothorax (PNX) and/or pneumomediastinum (PNMD) in critically ill patients as a consequence of COVID-19-associated lung weakness (CALW).

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

SETTING

Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

PARTICIPANTS

Original research evaluating patients, with or without the need for protective invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), with a diagnosis of COVID-19, who developed atraumatic PNX or PNMD on admission or during hospital stay.

INTERVENTIONS

Data of interest were obtained from each article and analyzed and assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The risk of the variables of interest was assessed with data derived from studies including patients who developed atraumatic PNX or PNMD.

MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST

Mortality, mean ICU stay and mean PaO2/FiO2 at diagnosis.

RESULTS

Information was collected from 12 longitudinal studies. Data from a total of 4901 patients were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 1629 patients had an episode of atraumatic PNX and 253 patients had an episode of atraumatic PNMD. Despite the finding of significantly strong associations, the great heterogeneity between studies implies that the interpretation of results should be made with caution.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality among COVID-19 patients was higher in those who developed atraumatic PNX and/or PNMD compared to those who did not. The mean PaO2/FiO2 index was lower in patients who developed atraumatic PNX and/or PNMD. We propose grouping these cases under the term COVID-19-associated lung weakness (CALW).

[COVID-19-associated lung weakness (CALW): Systematic review and meta-analysis]

Objectives

To assess mortality and different clinical factors derived from the development of atraumatic pneumothorax (PNX) and/or pneumomediastinum (PNMD) in critically ill patients as a consequence of COVID-19-associated lung weakness (CALW).

Design

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Setting

Intensive care unit (ICU).

Participants

Original research evaluating patients, with or without the need for protective invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), with a diagnosis of COVID-19 who had developed atraumatic PNX or PNMD on admission or during their hospital stay.

Interventions

Data of interest were obtained from each article and analysed and assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The risk of the variables of interest was assessed by data derived from studies including patients who developed atraumatic PNX or PNMD.

Main variables of interest

Mortality, mean ICU length of stay and mean PaO₂/FiO₂ at diagnosis.

Results

Data were collected from 12 longitudinal studies. Data from a total of 4,901 patients were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 1,629 patients had an episode of atraumatic PNX and 253 patients had an episode of atraumatic PNMD. Despite finding significantly strong associations, the high heterogeneity between studies means that interpretation of the results should be made with caution.

Conclusions

Mortality of COVID-19 patients was higher in those who developed atraumatic PNX and/or PNMD compared to those who did not. The mean PaO2/FiO2 index was lower in patients who developed atraumatic PNX and/or PNMD. We propose to group these cases under the term CAPD.

Lung Recruitment Maneuvers Assessment by Bedside Lung Ultrasound in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The use of recruitment maneuvers (RMs) is suggested to improve severe oxygenation failure in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a non-invasive, safe, and easily repeatable tool. It could be used to monitor the lung recruitment process in real-time. This paper aims to evaluate bedside LUS for assessing PEEP-induced pulmonary reaeration during RMs in pediatric patients. A case of a child with severe ARDS due to Haemophilus influenzae infection is presented. Due to his poor clinical, laboratory, and radiological evolution, he was placed on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Despite all measures, severe pulmonary collapse prevented proper improvement. Thus, RMs were indicated, and bedside LUS was successfully used for monitoring and assessing lung recruitment. The initial lung evaluation before the maneuver showed a tissue pattern characterized by a severe loss of lung aeration with dynamic air bronchograms and multiple coalescent B-lines. While raising a PEEP of 30 mmH2O, LUS showed the presence of A-lines, which was considered a predictor of reaeration in response to the recruitment maneuver. The LUS pattern could be used to assess modifications in the lung aeration, evaluate the effectiveness of RMs, and prevent lung overdistension.

Recruitment manoeuvres in anaesthesia: How many more excuses are there not to use them?

Pulmonary recruitment manoeuvres (RM) are intended to reopen collapsed lung areas. RMs are present in nature as a physiological mechanism to get a newborn to open their lungs for the first time at birth, and we also use them, in our usual anaesthesiological clinical practice, after induction or during general anaesthesia when a patient is desaturated. However, there is much confusion in clinical practice regarding their safety, the best way to perform them, when to do them, in which patients they are indicated, and in those where they are totally contraindicated. There are important differences between RM in the patient with adult respiratory distress syndrome, and in a healthy patient during general anaesthesia. Our intention is to review, from a clinical and practical point of view, the use of RM, specifically in anaesthesia.

Positive end expiratory pressure titration guided by plateau pressure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

BACKGROUND

PEEP decreases intrinsic PEEP (PEEPi) in COPD patients. However, the best PEEP for someone with COPD is unclear.

METHODS

Ten COPD patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation were enrolled. Before PEEP titration, subjects were sedated and received mandatory ventilation. PEEP increased from 0 to 15 cmH₂ O. At each PEEP, peak pressure (Ppeak), plateau pressure (Pplat), PEEPi, and other variables were recorded. Increment of Pplat (ΔPplat) and PEEPi were plotted against PEEP applied. The best PEEP was recorded at the cross of the two curves.

RESULTS

From PEEP = 0 cmH₂ O to best PEEP, Ppeak (37.4 ± 5.1 vs. 38.4 ± 4.9 cmH₂ O) and Pplat (18.7 ± 3.3 vs. 20.4 ± 3.2 cmH₂ O) increased slightly, resistance (28.1 ± 5.6 vs. 26.6 ± 5.0 cmH₂ O/l/s) decreased slightly, and PEEPi (7.9 ± 2.3 vs. 1.5 ± 0.4 cmH₂ O) decreased sharply. Compliance, heart rate, blood pressure, and SpO₂ did not change. However, from best PEEP to PEEP = 15 cmH₂ O, Ppeak (38.4 ± 4.9 vs. 44.9 ± 4.3 cmH₂ O) and Pplat (20.4 ± 3.2 vs. 27.6 ± 3.3 cmH₂ O) increased sharply, and systolic blood pressure (116 ± 13 vs. 99 ± 14 mmHg) and compliance (46.1 ± 18.1 vs. 37.7 ± 10.6 mL/cmH₂ O) decreased sharply. At the same time, PEEPi (1.5 ± 0.4 vs. 0.7 ± 0.8 cmH₂ O) decreased only slightly, and resistance, heart rate, and SpO₂ did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to use Pplat as a simple way of determining the best PEEP in COPD patients.

[Respiratory and hemodynamic changes during lung recruitment maneuvering through progressive increases and decreases in PEEP level]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the respiratory and hemodynamic changes during lung recruitment maneuvering (LRM) through stepwise increases and decreases in PEEP level.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective study in a 17-bed ICU was carried out.

PATIENTS

Twenty-one patients with acute respiratory failure and bilateral pulmonary infiltration.

INTERVENTION

LRM was carried out, consisting of stepwise increases in PEEP (4 cmH(2)O every 3 minutes), with fixed ventilation pressure, until reaching a maximal value of 36 cmH(2)O PEEP (ascending branch), followed by progressive decreases in PEEP (2 cmH(2)O every 3 minutes) until establishing the open-lung PEEP at the value associated to maximum respiratory compliance (Crs) (descending branch). Continuous hemodynamic monitoring was performed using an esophageal echodoppler probe.

RESULTS

Crs gradually decreased in the ascending branch of the LRM, and progressively increased surpassing the initial value after establish the open-lung PEEP in the descending branch, reducing the ventilation pressure and increasing the SpO(2)/FiO(2) ratio. Hemodynamic changes primarily consisted of a fall in cardiac output and left ventricular preload, together with an increased heart rate and cardiac contractility. At comparable levels of PEEP and mean airway pressure, these changes were more pronounced during the descending branch of the LRM.

CONCLUSIONS

1) LRM increased Crs, improving oxygenation and decreasing ventilation pressure; 2) the main hemodynamic consequence was the drop in cardiac output and left ventricular preload; and 3) the unequal hemodynamic derangement in both branches, at the same level of PEEP and mean airway pressure, showed that, along with intrathoracic pressure, other factor such as Crs and hypercapnia may have influenced the hemodynamic consequences of this type of LRM.