Enteral nutrition in the hemodynamically unstable critically ill patient

Construction of a Risk Prediction Model for the Occurrence of Acute Skin Failure in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

The risk factors for acute skin failure (ASF), a serious complication of the skin, are not fully understood.

PURPOSE

This study was designed to explore the risk factors for ASF in critically ill patients and construct a clinical prediction model.

METHODS

Intensive care unit patients were prospectively observed and assigned into two groups: with and without ASF. A logistic regression model was constructed, and its predictive power and clinical utility were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 204 eligible patients enrolled as participants, 58 (28.43%) developed ASF. Sepsis, vasoactive drugs, and age were shown to be risk factors for ASF, whereas peripheral perfusion index ratio and albumin level were shown to be protective factors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.83. The maximum Youden index of the model was 0.39 (specificity: 0.87, sensitivity: 0.77). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test (p = .20) and calibration curve showed good fitness and predictive utility with respect to the model.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed model effectively predicts ASF risk, allowing for the early identification of high-risk patients. Identifying risk factors such as sepsis, vasoactive drugs, and age and considering protective factors such as peripheral perfusion index and albumin levels may help optimize care plans. Clinical staff should pay special attention to these factors and their impact on skin health in critically ill patients.

The medical treatment of cardiogenic shock

Cardiogenic shock is characterized by tissue hypoperfusion due to the inadequate cardiac output to maintain the tissue oxygen demand. Despite some advances in cardiogenic shock management, extremely high mortality is still associated with this clinical syndrome. Its management is based on the immediate stabilization of hemodynamic parameters through medical care and the use of mechanical circulatory supports in specialized centers. This review aims to understand the cardiogenic shock current medical treatment, consisting mainly of inotropic drugs, vasopressors and coronary revascularization. In addition, we highlight the relevance of applying measures to other organ levels based on the optimization of mechanical ventilation and the appropriate initiation of renal replacement therapy.

Smartfeeding: A Dynamic Strategy to Increase Nutritional Efficiency in Critically Ill Patients-Positioning Document of the Metabolism and Nutrition Working Group and the Early Mobilization Working Group of the Catalan Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (SOCMiC)

Adequate medical nutrition therapy for critically ill patients has an impact on their prognoses. However, it requires an individualized approach that takes into account the activity (phases of metabolic stress) and particularity of these patients. We propose a comprehensive strategy considering the patients' nutritional status and the set of modifiable circumstances in these patients, in order to optimize/support nutritional efficiency: (1) A detailed anamnesis and an adequate initial nutritional assessment must be performed in order to implement medical nutrition therapy that is in line with the needs and characteristics of each patient. Furthermore, risks associated with refeeding syndrome, nutritrauma or gastrointestinal dysfunction must be considered and prevented. (2) A safe transition between nutrition therapy routes and between health care units will greatly contribute to recovery. The main objective is to preserve lean mass in critically ill patients, considering metabolic factors, adequate protein intake and muscle stimulation. (3) Continuous monitoring is required for the successful implementation of any health strategy. We lack precise tools for calculating nutritional efficiency in critically ill patients, therefore thorough monitoring of the process is essential. (4) The medical nutrition approach in critically ill patients is multidisciplinary and requires the participation of the entire team involved. A comprehensive strategy such as this can make a significant difference in the functional recovery of critically ill patients, but leaders must be identified to promote training, evaluation, analysis and feedback as essential components of its implementation, and to coordinate this process with the recognition of hospital management.

Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients Under Vasoactive Drug Therapy. The NUTRIVAD Study

BACKGROUND

Enteral nutrition (EN) in critically ill patients requiring vasoactive drug (VAD) support is controversial. This study assesses the tolerability and safety of EN in such patients.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was conducted in 23 ICUs over 30 months. Inclusion criteria were a need for VAD and/or mechanic circulatory support (MCS) over a minimum of 48 h, a need for at least 48 h of mechanical ventilation, an estimated life expectancy longer than 72 h, and at least 72 h of ICU stay. Patients with refractory shock were excluded. EN was performed according to established protocols during which descriptive, daily hemodynamic and efficacy and safety data were collected. An independent research group conducted the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of 200 patients included, 30 (15%) required MCS and 145 (73%) met early multiorgan dysfunction criteria. Mortality was 24%. Patients needed a mean dose of norepinephrine in the first 48 h of 0.71 μg/kg/min (95%CI: 0.63-0.8) targeting a mean arterial pressure of 68 mmHg (95%CI: 67-70) during the first 48 h. EN was started 34 h (95%CI: 31-37) after ICU admission. Mean energy and protein delivered by EN/patient/day were 1159 Kcal (95%CI: 1098-1220) and 55.6 g (52.4-58.7) respectively. Daily energy balance during EN/patient/day was -432 (95%CI: -496 to -368). 154 (77%) patients experienced EN-related complications. However, severe complications such as mesenteric ischemia were recorded in only 1 patient (0.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

EN in these patients seems feasible, safe and unrelated to serious complications. Reaching the energy target only through EN is difficult.

CLINICAL RELEVANCY STATEMENT

Enteral nutrition (EN) in critically ill patients requiring vasoactive drugs (VAD) is currently a subject of controversy. Factors such as when to start EN, dosing, monitoring, or whether to avoid EN altogether are a real challenge because of its link to a risk of bowel ischemia. We describe our experience with EN in 200 critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation and requiring VAD. Under adequate supervision, EN proved feasible and safe. Our findings require confirmation in clinical intervention trials. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Medical nutrition therapy in hemodynamically unstable patients due to cardiogenic shock with infected bronchiectasis and severe protein-energy malnutrition

OBJECTIVE

Cardiogenic shock is defined as tissue hypoperfusion due to cardiac dysfunction. It is associated with hemodynamic unstability and elevated arterial lactate as one indicator for anaerobic metabolism. Hypercatabolic state in this condition leads to increasing nutritional requirement and negative nitrogen balance. Therefore, medical nutrition therapy by considering metabolic tolerance can prevent further metabolic deterioration and loss of lean mass and improve the patient's clinical outcome.

METHODS

A 44-years-old female patient with severe protein-energy malnutrition (Subjective Global Assessment Score C; MUAC 15cm) suffered from hemodynamic unstability due to cardiogenic shock and infected bronchiectasis at the infection center of Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital. Intake was postponed due to mean arterial pressure 56mmHg on vasopressor support and oxygen saturation below 93%. Physical examinations showed loss of subcutaneous fat, lung crackles and wheezing, muscle wasting, and pretibial edema. Laboratory assessments showed elevated arterial lactate (3.2mmol/L), hypoalbuminemia (2.4g/dL), lymphocytopenia (650/μL), elevated liver enzymes (SGOT 780U/L; SGPT 868U/L), and urine urea nitrogen (5g/24h). Nutritional therapy was started after mean arterial pressure ≥65mmHg with a stable dosage of the vasopressor drug and decreased arterial lactate level to 2.2mmol/L then given gradually with a target calorie of 1500kcal and protein 1.5-1.8g/kg ideal body weight/day using high protein diet. Arterial lactate and blood gass analyses were controlled every day to determine the target of nutritional therapy day by the day. Snakehead fish extract, zinc, vitamin B complex, Thiamine, vitamin C, vitamin A, vitamin D3, and Curcumin were supplied.

RESULT

After 15 days of nutritional therapy, the patient was discharged from the hospital with stable hemodynamic without vasopressor support, adequate nutritional intake, improvement of anthropometric parameters, and laboratory test results (arterial lactate 1.6mmol/L, albumin 3.1g/dL, lymphocyte 1.871/μL, SGOT 34U/L, SGPT 41U/L, urine urea nitrogen 0.72g/24h).

CONCLUSION

Adequate nutritional therapy, which is planned by evaluating hemodynamic tolerance, can improve patient clinical outcomes and positive nitrogen balance in the hemodynamically unstable patient.

Vasopressors and Nutrition Therapy: Safe Dose for the Outset of Enteral Nutrition?

Background and Aims

Patients with hemodynamic instability need to receive intensive treatment as fluid replacement and vasoactive drugs. In the meantime, it is supposed to initiate nutritional therapy within 24 to 48 hours after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), as an essential part of patient's intensive care and better outcomes. However, there are many controversies tangential to the prescription of enteral nutrition (EN) concomitant to the use of vasopressor and its doses. In this way, the present study aimed to identify what the literature presents of evidence to guide the clinical practice concerning the safe dose of vasopressors for the initiation of nutritional therapy in critically ill patients.

Methods

This review was carried out in PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Medline databases. The descriptors were used to perform the search strategy: Critical Care, Intensive Care Units, Vasoconstrictor Agents, and Enteral Nutrition. Inclusion criteria were patients of both genders, over 18 years of age, using vasoactive drugs, with the possibility of receiving EN therapy, and articles written in English, Portuguese, and Spanish. In addition, exclusion criteria were case reports, non-papers, and repeated papers.

Results

10 articles met our inclusion criteria.

Conclusion

It was observed that there are many controversies about the supply of EN in critically ill patients using vasopressor, especially about the safe dose, and it was not possible to identify a cutoff value for the beginning therapy. Despite the drug doses, clinical signs are still the most important parameters in the evaluation of EN tolerance.

Impact of Intravenous Fluids and Enteral Nutrition on the Severity of Gastrointestinal Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Introduction

Gastrointestinal dysfunction (GDF) is one of the primary causes of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Intensive care interventions, such as intravenous fluids and enteral feeding, can exacerbate GDF. There exists a paucity of high-quality literature on the interaction between these two modalities (intravenous fluids and enteral feeding) as a combined therapy on its impact on GDF.

Aim

To review the impact of intravenous fluids and enteral nutrition individually on determinants of gut function and implications in clinical practice.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials on intravenous fluids and enteral feeding on GDF were identified by a comprehensive database search of MEDLINE and EMBASE. Extraction of data was conducted for study characteristics, provision of fluids or feeding in both groups and quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane criteria. A random-effects model was applied to estimate the impact of these interventions across the spectrum of GDF severity.

Results

Restricted/ goal-directed intravenous fluid therapy is likely to reduce ‘mild’ GDF such as vomiting (p = 0.03) compared to a standard/ liberal intravenous fluid regime. Enterally fed patients experienced increased episodes of vomiting (p = <0.01) but were less likely to develop an anastomotic leak (p = 0.03) and peritonitis (p = 0.03) compared to parenterally fed patients. Vomiting (p = <0.01) and anastomotic leak (p = 0.04) were significantly lower in the early enteral feeding group.

Conclusions

There is less emphasis on the combined approach of intravenous fluid resuscitation and enteral feeding in critically ill patients. Conservative fluid resuscitation and aggressive enteral feeding are presumably key factors contributing to severe life-threatening GDF. Future trials should evaluate the impact of cross-interaction between conservative and aggressive modes of these two interventions on the severity of GDF.

Practice Guidelines for Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients: A Relook for Indian Scenario

Background and Aim:

Intensive-care practices and settings may differ for India in comparison to other countries. While international guidelines are available to direct the use of enteral nutrition (EN), there are no recommendations specific to Indian settings. Advisory board meetings were arranged to develop the practice guidelines specific to Indian context, for the use of EN in critically ill patients and to overcome challenges in this field.

Methods:

Various existing guidelines, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, controlled trials, and review articles were reviewed for their contextual relevance and strength. A systematic grading of practice guidelines by advisory board was done based on strength of the supporting evidence. Wherever Indian studies were not available, references were taken from the international guidelines.

Results:

Based on the literature review, the recommendations for developing the practice guidelines were made as per the grading criteria agreed upon by the advisory board. The recommendations were to address challenges regarding EN versus parenteral nutrition; nutrition screening and assessment; nutrition in hemodynamically unstable; route of nutrition; tube feeding and challenges; tolerance; optimum calorie-protein requirements; selection of appropriate enteral feeding formula; micronutrients and immune-nutrients; standard nutrition in hepatic, renal, and respiratory diseases and documentation of nutrition practices.

Conclusion:

This paper summarizes the optimum nutrition practices for critically ill patients. The possible solutions to overcome the challenges in this field are presented as practice guidelines at the end of each section. These guidelines are expected to provide guidance in critical care settings regarding appropriate critical-care nutrition practices and to set up Intensive Care Unit nutrition protocols.

Comparison of Intermittent and Bolus Enteral Feeding Methods on Enteral Feeding Intolerance of Patients with Sepsis: A Triple-blind Controlled Trial in Intensive Care Units

BACKGROUND

Recent trials have shown controversial results on which enteral feeding methods has a lower risk of enteral feeding intolerance. Therefore, we aimed to compare two methods of bolus and intermittent feeding on enteral feeding intolerance of patients with sepsis.

METHODS

This triple-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on 60 patients with sepsis, who were fed through tubes for at least 3 days. The patients were randomly assigned into bolus feeding, intermittent feeding, and control groups. Enteral feeding intolerance of all patients was recorded in 3 consecutive days by a researcher-made checklist including the data on gastric residual volume, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, and abdominal distension.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the three studied groups in none of the intervention days pertaining to constipation, diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal distention, and gastric residual volume (p > 0.05). Also, no statistically significant difference was found between all variables in the three studied groups during the 3 days (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

As enteral feeding intolerance of patients with sepsis was similar in both bolus and intermittent feeding methods, it can be concluded that bolus method can still be used as a standard method to decrease the risk of enteral feeding intolerance if it is used properly