Analysis of delays in the prescription of oseltamivir in hospitals and potential for improvement

Low rate of oseltamivir prescription among adults and children with confirmed influenza illness in France during the 2018-19 influenza season

BACKGROUND

Oseltamivir shows effectiveness in reducing influenza-related symptoms, morbidity and mortality. Its prescription remains suboptimal.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to describe oseltamivir prescription in confirmed cases of influenza and to identify associated factors.

METHODS

A prospective monocentric observational study was conducted between 1 December 2018 and 30 April 2019. All patients with a virologically confirmed influenza diagnosis were included. Factors associated with oseltamivir prescription were studied.

RESULTS

Influenza was confirmed in 755 patients (483 children and 272 adults), of which 188 (25.1%) were hospitalized and 86 (11.4%) had signs of severity. Oseltamivir was prescribed for 452 patients (59.9%), more frequently in children than in adults [329/483 (68.1%) versus 123/272 (45.2%), P < 0.001]. Factors associated with oseltamivir prescription were evaluated in 729 patients (246 adults and 483 children). Patients with at least one risk factor for severe influenza received oseltamivir less frequently (50%, 137/274) than those without risk factors (70%, 315/452) (P < 0.001). Pregnant women received oseltamivir in 81% of cases (17/21). Severe influenza cases were treated with oseltamivir in only 45.3% (39/86). The median duration of symptoms was 24 h (IQR 12-48) in treated patients versus 72 h (IQR 48-120) in untreated patients (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Oseltamivir should be administered as early as possible, preferably within 24-48 h after illness onset, for the best benefits. It is, however, very important to promote the use of neuraminidase inhibitor ('NAI') treatment beyond 48 h in some specific patient populations.

Positive Impact of a Point-of-Care Molecular Influenza Test in the Emergency Department During the 2017-2018 Seasonal Influenza Epidemic

During the 2017-2018 flu epidemic, the point-of-care Alere-i (n = 72) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (n = 106) tests were compared. Patients in the point-of-care group were administered oseltamivir significantly more rapidly (9 hours vs 23 hours), they spent less time in the emergency department, and they had lower rates of antibiotic administration and hospitalization.

Influenza virus-related critical illness: prevention, diagnosis, treatment

Annual seasonal influenza epidemics of variable severity result in significant morbidity and mortality in the United States (U.S.) and worldwide. In temperate climate countries, including the U.S., influenza activity peaks during the winter months. Annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons in the U.S. aged 6 months and older, and among those at increased risk for influenza-related complications in other parts of the world (e.g. young children, elderly). Observational studies have reported effectiveness of influenza vaccination to reduce the risks of severe disease requiring hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and death. A diagnosis of influenza should be considered in critically ill patients admitted with complications such as exacerbation of underlying chronic comorbidities, community-acquired pneumonia, and respiratory failure during influenza season. Molecular tests are recommended for influenza testing of respiratory specimens in hospitalized patients. Antigen detection assays are not recommended in critically ill patients because of lower sensitivity; negative results of these tests should not be used to make clinical decisions, and respiratory specimens should be tested for influenza by molecular assays. Because critically ill patients with lower respiratory tract disease may have cleared influenza virus in the upper respiratory tract, but have prolonged influenza viral replication in the lower respiratory tract, an endotracheal aspirate (preferentially) or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimen (if collected for other diagnostic purposes) should be tested by molecular assay for detection of influenza viruses.Observational studies have reported that antiviral treatment of critically ill adult influenza patients with a neuraminidase inhibitor is associated with survival benefit. Since earlier initiation of antiviral treatment is associated with the greatest clinical benefit, standard-dose oseltamivir (75 mg twice daily in adults) for enteric administration is recommended as soon as possible as it is well absorbed in critically ill patients. Based upon observational data that suggest harms, adjunctive corticosteroid treatment is currently not recommended for children or adults hospitalized with influenza, including critically ill patients, unless clinically indicated for another reason, such as treatment of asthma or COPD exacerbation, or septic shock. A number of pharmaceutical agents are in development for treatment of severe influenza.

Influenza virus-related critical illness: prevention, diagnosis, treatment

Annual seasonal influenza epidemics of variable severity result in significant morbidity and mortality in the United States (U.S.) and worldwide. In temperate climate countries, including the U.S., influenza activity peaks during the winter months. Annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons in the U.S. aged 6 months and older, and among those at increased risk for influenza-related complications in other parts of the world (e.g. young children, elderly). Observational studies have reported effectiveness of influenza vaccination to reduce the risks of severe disease requiring hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and death. A diagnosis of influenza should be considered in critically ill patients admitted with complications such as exacerbation of underlying chronic comorbidities, community-acquired pneumonia, and respiratory failure during influenza season. Molecular tests are recommended for influenza testing of respiratory specimens in hospitalized patients. Antigen detection assays are not recommended in critically ill patients because of lower sensitivity; negative results of these tests should not be used to make clinical decisions, and respiratory specimens should be tested for influenza by molecular assays. Because critically ill patients with lower respiratory tract disease may have cleared influenza virus in the upper respiratory tract, but have prolonged influenza viral replication in the lower respiratory tract, an endotracheal aspirate (preferentially) or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimen (if collected for other diagnostic purposes) should be tested by molecular assay for detection of influenza viruses.Observational studies have reported that antiviral treatment of critically ill adult influenza patients with a neuraminidase inhibitor is associated with survival benefit. Since earlier initiation of antiviral treatment is associated with the greatest clinical benefit, standard-dose oseltamivir (75 mg twice daily in adults) for enteric administration is recommended as soon as possible as it is well absorbed in critically ill patients. Based upon observational data that suggest harms, adjunctive corticosteroid treatment is currently not recommended for children or adults hospitalized with influenza, including critically ill patients, unless clinically indicated for another reason, such as treatment of asthma or COPD exacerbation, or septic shock. A number of pharmaceutical agents are in development for treatment of severe influenza.