1
|
Risely A, Müller-Klein N, Schmid DW, Wilhelm K, Clutton-Brock TH, Manser MB, Sommer S. Climate change drives loss of bacterial gut mutualists at the expense of host survival in wild meerkats. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2023; 29:5816-5828. [PMID: 37485753 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
Climate change and climate-driven increases in infectious disease threaten wildlife populations globally. Gut microbial responses are predicted to either buffer or exacerbate the negative impacts of these twin pressures on host populations. However, examples that document how gut microbial communities respond to long-term shifts in climate and associated disease risk, and the consequences for host survival, are rare. Over the past two decades, wild meerkats inhabiting the Kalahari have experienced rapidly rising temperatures, which is linked to the spread of tuberculosis (TB). We show that over the same period, the faecal microbiota of this population has become enriched in Bacteroidia and impoverished in lactic acid bacteria (LAB), a group of bacteria including Lactococcus and Lactobacillus that are considered gut mutualists. These shifts occurred within individuals yet were compounded over generations, and were better explained by mean maximum temperatures than mean rainfall over the previous year. Enriched Bacteroidia were additionally associated with TB exposure and disease, the dry season and poorer body condition, factors that were all directly linked to reduced future survival. Lastly, abundances of LAB taxa were independently and positively linked to future survival, while enriched taxa did not predict survival. Together, these results point towards extreme temperatures driving an expansion of a disease-associated pathobiome and loss of beneficial taxa. Our study provides the first evidence from a longitudinally sampled population that climate change is restructuring wildlife gut microbiota, and that these changes may amplify the negative impacts of climate change through the loss of gut mutualists. While the plastic response of host-associated microbiotas is key for host adaptation under normal environmental fluctuations, extreme temperature increases might lead to a breakdown of coevolved host-mutualist relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Risely
- Institute for Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
- School of Science, Engineering, and the Environment, Salford University, Salford, UK
| | - Nadine Müller-Klein
- Institute for Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Dominik W Schmid
- Institute for Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Kerstin Wilhelm
- Institute for Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tim H Clutton-Brock
- Large Animal Research Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Kalahari Research Trust, Kuruman River Reserve, Van Zylsrus, Northern Cape, South Africa
| | - Marta B Manser
- Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Kalahari Research Trust, Kuruman River Reserve, Van Zylsrus, Northern Cape, South Africa
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simone Sommer
- Institute for Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hu C, Wang W, Garey KW. Heterogeneity and lyophilization comparison of stool processing for gastrointestinal bile acid measurement by LC-MS/MS. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2023; 1214:123569. [PMID: 36527807 PMCID: PMC9839599 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2022.123569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Fecal bile acid (BA) analysis is an emerging area of gut microbiome research. However, sample preparation procedures for fecal BA analysis are not standardized. Current fecal BA analysis often utilizes either original or lyophilized aliquot, and fecal BA result difference between these two processing steps remains not systematically investigated. Moreover, the distribution pattern of fecal BA in the collected stool sample also remains unclear but affects interpretation of fecal BA for downstream experiments. To address these two questions regarding effect of lyophilization on fecal BA and fecal heterogeneity, fourteen separate BAs were quantified from 60 aliquots obtained from 10 clinical fecal samples using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). BA concentrations in the lyophilized sample were typically 2-4 folds higher than those in the original sample, but were almost identical using a water-adjusted lyophilized BA concentration. The fecal BA compositional profile and four BA ratios were similar utilizing either the original or lyophilized samples. BA concentrations were similar among different aliquots of differing starting mass except for the relatively trace-level BA. Therefore, it is suggested that fecal BA concentrations should be presented as the original sample concentration or water-adjusted lyophilization concentration to allow comparisons between studies. A single aliquot (20-100 mg) of stool can be used to reflect the concentrations in the entire sample. These results help to standardize analyses in this emerging field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenlin Hu
- University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Weiqun Wang
- University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kevin W Garey
- University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bensch HM, Tolf C, Waldenström J, Lundin D, Zöttl M. Freeze-drying can replace cold-chains for transport and storage of fecal microbiome samples. PeerJ 2022; 10:e13095. [PMID: 35310158 PMCID: PMC8932309 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The transport and storage of samples in temperatures of minus 80 °C is commonly considered as the gold standard for microbiome studies. However, studies conducting sample collection at remote sites without a reliable cold-chain would benefit from a sample preservation method that allows transport and storage at ambient temperature. Methods In this study we compare alpha diversity and 16S microbiome composition of 20 fecal sample replicates from Damaraland mole-rats (Fukomys damarensis) preserved in a minus 80 °C freezer and transported on dry ice to freeze-dried samples that were stored and transported in ambient temperature until DNA extraction. Results We found strong correlations between relative abundances of Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) between preservation treatments of the sample, no differences in alpha diversity measures between the two preservation treatments and minor effects of the preservation treatment on beta diversity measures. Our results show that freeze-drying samples can be a useful method for cost-effective transportation and storage of microbiome samples that yields quantitatively almost indistinguishable results in 16S microbiome analyses as those stored in minus 80 °C.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna M. Bensch
- Centre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMIS), Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, Sweden,Kalahari Research Centre, Kuruman River Reserve, Van Zylsrus, South Africa
| | - Conny Tolf
- Centre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMIS), Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, Sweden
| | - Jonas Waldenström
- Centre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMIS), Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, Sweden
| | - Daniel Lundin
- Centre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMIS), Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, Sweden
| | - Markus Zöttl
- Centre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMIS), Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, Sweden,Kalahari Research Centre, Kuruman River Reserve, Van Zylsrus, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|