Pin1, endothelial nitric oxide synthase, and amyloid-β form a feedback signaling loop involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease, hypertension, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy

An In Vitro Model of the Blood-Brain Barrier to Study Alzheimer's Disease: The Role of β-Amyloid and Its Influence on PBMC Infiltration

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a highly specialized structure, constituted by endothelial cells that together with astrocytes and pericytes provide a functional interface between the central nervous system and the periphery. Several pathological conditions may affect its functions, and lately BBB involvement in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease has been demonstrated. Both endothelial cells and astrocytes can be differentially affected during the course of the disease. In vitro BBB models present a powerful tool in evaluating the effects that β-amyloid (Aβ), or other pathogenic stimuli, play on the BBB at cellular level. In vitro BBB models derived from human cell sources are rare and not easily implemented. We generated two conditionally immortalized human cell lines, brain microvascular endothelial cells (TY10), and astrocytes (hAST), that, when co-cultured under appropriate conditions, exhibit BBB-like characteristics. This model allowed us to evaluate the transmigration of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) through the in vitro barrier exposed to Aβ and the role played by astrocytes in the modulation of this phenomenon. We describe here the methodology used in our lab to set up our in vitro model of the BBB and to carry out a PBMC transmigration assay.

Circulating asymmetric dimethylarginine and cognitive decline: A 4-year follow-up study of the 1936 Aberdeen Birth Cohort

BACKGROUND

The underlying mechanisms leading to dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD) are unclear. Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, may be associated with cognitive decline, but population-based evidence is lacking.

METHODS

Change in cognitive performance was assessed in participants of the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936 using longitudinal Raven's progressive matrices (RPM) between 2000 and 2004. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate the association between ADMA concentrations in 2000 and change in cognitive performance after adjustment for potential confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 93 participants had complete information on cognitive performance between 2000 and 2004. Mean plasma ADMA concentrations were approximately 0.4 μmol/L lower in those participants with stable or improved RPM scores over follow-up compared with participants whose cognitive performance worsened. In confounder-adjusted analysis, one SD (0.06 μmol/L) increase in ADMA at 63 years of age was associated with an average reduction in RPM of 1.26 points (95% CI 0.14-2.26) after 4 years.

CONCLUSION

Raised plasma ADMA concentrations predicted worsening cognitive performance after approximately 4 years in this cohort of adults in late-middle age. These findings have implications for future research, including presymptomatic diagnosis or novel therapeutic targets for dementia and AD.

Astrocytes contribute to Aβ-induced blood-brain barrier damage through activation of endothelial MMP9

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) plays an important role in the maintenance of the brain homeostasis, and its proper functions are warranted by the interplay between different cellular components (endothelial cells, astrocytes and pericytes). BBB dysfunctions in pathological conditions, and particularly in Alzheimer's disease, have been documented. Here, using an in vitroBBB model, the interaction between endothelial cells and astrocytes exposed to Aβ1-42 was investigated. Human endothelial cells, cultured in monolayer or co-cultured with astrocytes, were exposed to Aβ1-42 (2 μM for 18 h). Aβ induced dysfunction of endothelial barrier, as assessed by enhanced permeability to FITC-conjugated dextran and reduced expression of claudin-5; these modifications were observed in the co-culture model, but not in endothelial cells cultured in monolayer. Similarly, Aβ-induced damage at the barrier was observed when endothelial cells were challenged in the presence of conditioned medium generated by astrocytes previously exposed to Aβ (ACM Aβ). Endothelial barrier damages were associated with enhanced matrix metalloprotease 9 (MMP9) activity, known to mediate claudin-5 disruption. These events were not related to the direct effects played by Aβ on endothelial cells, but they were rather the consequence of Aβ-induced vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in astrocytes. Indeed, when vascular endothelial growth factor expression was down-regulated in astrocytes, neither barrier properties or MMP9 expression in endothelial cells were affected after Aβ exposure both in the co-culture model or in the presence of ACM Aβ. These data point out the importance of astrocytes' mediation in inducing endothelial sensitivity to Aβ1-42.

Double-Edged Roles of Nitric Oxide Signaling on APP Processing and Amyloid-β Production In Vitro: Preliminary Evidence from Sodium Nitroprusside

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that is thought to be caused in part by the age-related accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) in the brain. Recent findings have revealed that nitric oxide (NO) modulates the processing of amyloid-β precursor protein (APP) and alters Aβ production; however, the previously presented data are contradictory and the underlying molecular mechanisms are still incomplete. Here, using human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells stably transfected with wild-type APPwt695, we found that NO, derived from NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP), bi-directionally modulates APP processing in vitro. The data from ELISA and Western blot (WB) tests indicated that SNP at lower concentrations (0.01 and 0.1 μM) inhibits BACE1 expression, thus consequently suppresses APP β-cleavage and decreases Aβ production. In contrast, SNP at higher concentrations (10 and 20 μM) biases the APP processing toward the amyloidogenic pathway as evidenced by an increased BACE1 but a decreased ADAM10 expression, together with an elevated Aβ secretion. This bi-directional modulating activity of SNP on APP processing was completely blocked by specific NO scavenger c-PTIO, indicating NO-dependent mechanisms. Moreover, the anti-amyloidogenic activity of SNP is sGC/cGMP/PKG-dependent as evidenced by its reversal by sGC/PKG inhibitions, whereas the amyloidogenic activity of SNP is peroxynitrite-related and can be reversed by peroxynitrite scavenger uric acid. In summary, these present findings predict a double-edged role of NO in APP processing in vitro. Low (physiological) levels of NO inhibit the amyloidogenic processing of APP, whereas extra-high (pathological) concentrations of NO favor the amyloidogenic pathway of APP processing. This preliminary study may provide further evidence to clarify the molecular roles of NO and NO-related signaling in AD and supply potential molecular targets for AD treatment.

Pin1 liberates the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1): Must we stop it?

Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) is mainly caused by the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1). To our knowledge, this is the first review focusing on the vital role of Pin1 in the infection of HIV-1 and the development of AIDS. We and others have demonstrated that Pin1, the only known cis-to-trans isomerase recognizing the pThr/pSer-Pro motifs in proteins, plays striking roles in several human diseases. Interestingly, recent evidence gradually indicates that Pin1 regulates several key steps of the life cycle of HIV-1, including the uncoating of the HIV-1 core, the reverse transcription of the RNA genome of HIV-1, and the integration of the HIV-1 cDNA into human chromosomes. Whereas inhibiting Pin1 suppresses all of these key steps and attenuates the replication of HIV-1, at the same time different PIN1 gene variants are correlated with the susceptibility to HIV-1 infection. Furthermore, Pin1 potentially promotes HIV-1 infection by activating multiple oncogenes and inactivating multiple tumor suppressors, extending the life span of HIV-infected cells. These descriptions suggest Pin1 as a promising therapeutic target for the prevention of HIV-1 and highlight the possibility of blocking the development of AIDS by Pin1 inhibitors.

Noncovalent binding of a cyclic peptide inhibitor to the peptidyl-prolyl isomerase Pin1, explored by hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry

Pin1 is a peptidyl-prolyl isomerase (PPIase) that plays a central role in eukaryotic cell cycle regulation, making this protein an interesting target for cancer therapy. Pin1 exhibits high specificity for substrates where proline is preceded by phosphoserine or phosphothreonine. The protein comprises an N-terminal WW (tryptophan–tryptophan) domain and a C-terminal PPIase domain. The cyclic peptide [CRYPEVEIC] (square brackets are used to denote the cyclic structure) represents a lead compound for a new class of nonphosphorylated Pin1 inhibitors. Unfortunately, it has not been possible thus far to characterize the Pin1–[CRYPEVEIC] complex by X-ray crystallography. Thus, the exact binding mode remains unknown. The current work employs hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for gaining insights into the Pin1–[CRYPEVEIC] interactions. The WW domain shows extensive conformational dynamics, both in the presence and in the absence of ligand. In contrast, profound changes in deuteration kinetics are observed in the PPIase domain after the addition of [CRYPEVEIC]. The secondary structure elements β2, α3, and α4 exhibit markedly reduced deuteration, consistent with their postulated involvement in ligand binding. Unexpectedly, [CRYPEVEIC] destabilizes the range of residues 61–86, a segment that comprises basic side chains that normally interact with the substrate phosphate. This destabilization is likely caused by steric clashes with Y3 or E5 of the inhibitor. Ligand-induced destabilization has previously been reported for a few other proteins, but effects of this type are not very common. Our findings suggest that future crystallization trials on Pin1 variants deleted for residues in the 61–86 range might provide a path towards high-resolution X-ray structures of Pin1 bound to cyclic peptide inhibitors.

Pin1-based diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for breast cancer

Pin1 is the only known cis-to-trans isomerase that recognizes the phosphorylated pThr/pSer-Pro motifs in many signaling molecules, playing unique roles in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. First, Pin1 is prevalently over-expressed in kinds of breast cancer cell lines and tissues, such as MDA-MB-231 cell, MCF-7 cell, Her2+, ERα+, and basal-like breast cancer subtypes. Second, Pin1 amplifies many oncogenic signaling pathways, inhibits multiple tumor suppressors, promotes the angiogenesis and metastasis of breast cancer cells, and enhances the resistance of breast cancer cells to anti-tumor medicines. Third, inhibiting Pin1 blocks most of these detrimental effects in a great number of breast cancer cell lines. These findings suggest Pin1 as a promising diagnostic biomarker as well as an efficient therapeutic target for breast cancer. It is strongly expected that a Pin1-positive subtype of breast cancers should be extremely concerned and that the therapeutic efficacy of Pin1 inhibitors on breast cancer patients should be evaluated as soon as possible. Nonetheless, Pin1-based therapeutic strategies for breast cancer still deserve some debates. Hence, we give the predictions of several important issues, such as application precondition, side effects, and personalized medication, when Pin1 inhibitors are used in the breast cancer therapy. These proposals are meaningful for the further development of Pin1-based diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in order to conquer breast cancer.