Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light is associated with survival in mitochondrial disease patients

Neurofilament light protein as a biomarker for spinal muscular atrophy: a review and reference ranges

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is the leading genetic cause of infant mortality, characterized by progressive neuromuscular degeneration resulting from mutations in the survival motor neuron (SMN1) gene. The availability of disease-modifying therapies for SMA therapies highlights the pressing need for easily accessible and cost-effective blood biomarkers to monitor treatment response and for better disease management. Additionally, the wide implementation of newborn genetic screening programs in Western countries enables presymptomatic diagnosis of SMA and immediate treatment administration. However, the absence of monitoring and prognostic blood biomarkers for neurodegeneration in SMA hinders effective disease management. Neurofilament light protein (NfL) is a promising biomarker of neuroaxonal damage in SMA and reflects disease progression in children with SMA undergoing treatment. Recently, the European Medicines Agency issued a letter of support endorsing the potential utilization of NfL as a biomarker of pediatric neurological diseases, including SMA. Within this review, we comprehensively assess the potential applications of NfL as a monitoring biomarker for disease severity and treatment response in pediatric-onset SMA. We provide reference ranges for normal levels of serum based NfL in neurologically healthy children aged 0-18 years. These reference ranges enable accurate interpretation of NfL levels in children and can accelerate the implementation of NfL into clinical practice.

Biomarkers of mitochondrial disorders

Mitochondrial diseases encompass a heterogeneous group of disorders with a wide range of clinical manifestations, most classically resulting in neurological, muscular, and metabolic abnormalities, but having the potential to affect any organ system. Over the years, substantial progress has been made in identifying and characterizing various biomarkers associated with mitochondrial diseases. This review summarizes the current knowledge of mitochondrial biomarkers based on a literature review and discusses the evidence behind their use in clinical practice. A total of 13 biomarkers were thoroughly reviewed including lactate, pyruvate, lactate:pyruvate ratio, creatine kinase, creatine, amino acid profiles, glutathione, malondialdehyde, GDF-15, FGF-21, gelsolin, neurofilament light-chain, and circulating cell-free mtDNA. Most biomarkers had mixed findings depending on the study, especially when considering their utility for specific mitochondrial diseases versus mitochondrial conditions in general. However, in large biomarker comparison studies, GDF-15 followed by FGF-21, seem to have the greatest value though they are still not perfect. As such, additional studies are needed, especially in light of newer biomarkers that have not yet been thoroughly investigated. Understanding the landscape of biomarkers in mitochondrial diseases is crucial for advancing early detection, improving patient management, and developing targeted therapies.

Fluid-Based Protein Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury: The View from the Bedside

There has been an explosion of research into biofluid (blood, cerebrospinal fluid, CSF)-based protein biomarkers in traumatic brain injury (TBI) over the past decade. The availability of very large datasets, such as CENTRE-TBI and TRACK-TBI, allows for correlation of blood- and CSF-based molecular (protein), radiological (structural) and clinical (physiological) marker data to adverse clinical outcomes. The quality of a given biomarker has often been framed in relation to the predictive power on the outcome quantified from the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. However, this does not in itself provide clinical utility but reflects a statistical association in any given population between one or more variables and clinical outcome. It is not currently established how to incorporate and integrate biofluid-based biomarker data into patient management because there is no standardized role for such data in clinical decision making. We review the current status of biomarker research and discuss how we can integrate existing markers into current clinical practice and what additional biomarkers do we need to improve diagnoses and to guide therapy and to assess treatment efficacy. Furthermore, we argue for employing machine learning (ML) capabilities to integrate the protein biomarker data with other established, routinely used clinical diagnostic tools, to provide the clinician with actionable information to guide medical intervention.

Serum Neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels in children with and without neurologic diseases

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) is a specific biomarker of neuronal damage. Elevated sNfL levels have been reported in numerous neurologic diseases in adults, whereas data on sNfL in the pediatric population are incomplete. The aim of this study was to investigate sNfL levels in children with various acute and chronic neurologic disorders and describe the age dependence of sNfL from infancy to adolescence.

METHODS

The total study cohort of this prospective cross-sectional study consisted of 222 children aged from 0 to 17 years. Patients' clinical data were reviewed and patients were assigned to the following groups: 101 (45.5%) controls, 34 (15.3%) febrile controls, 23 (10.4%) acute neurologic conditions (meningitis, facial nerve palsy, traumatic brain injury, or shunt dysfunction in hydrocephalus), 37 (16.7%) febrile seizures, 6 (2.7%) epileptic seizures, 18 (8.1%) chronic neurologic conditions (autism, cerebral palsy, inborn mitochondrial disorder, intracranial hypertension, spina bifida, or chromosomal abnormalities), and 3 (1.4%) severe systemic disease. sNfL levels were measured using a sensitive single-molecule array assay.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in sNfL levels between controls, febrile controls, febrile seizures, epileptic seizures, acute neurologic conditions, and chronic neurologic conditions. In children with severe systemic disorders, by far the highest NfL levels were found with an sNfL of 429 pg/ml in a patient with neuroblastoma, 126 pg/ml in a patient with cranial nerve palsy and pharyngeal Burkitt's lymphoma, and 42 pg/ml in a child with renal transplant rejection. The relationship between sNfL and age could be described by a second order polynomial with an R2 of 0.153 with a decrease of sNfL by 3.2% per year from birth to age 12 years and thereafter an increase by 2.7% per year until age 18 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study cohort, sNfL levels were not elevated in children with febrile or epileptic seizures, or various other neurologic diseases. Strikingly high sNfL levels were detected in children with oncologic disease or transplant rejection. A biphasic sNfL age-dependency was documented, with highest levels in infancy and late adolescence and the lowest levels in middle school age.

Neurofilaments contribution in clinic: state of the art

Neurological biomarkers are particularly valuable to clinicians as they can be used for diagnosis, prognosis, or response to treatment. This field of neurology has evolved considerably in recent years with the improvement of analytical methods, allowing the detection of biomarkers not only in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) but also in less invasive fluids like blood. These advances greatly facilitate the repeated quantification of biomarkers, including at asymptomatic stages of the disease. Among the various informative biomarkers of neurological disorders, neurofilaments (NfL) have proven to be of particular interest in many contexts, such as neurodegenerative diseases, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, stroke, and cancer. Here we discuss these different pathologies and the potential value of NfL assay in the management of these patients, both for diagnosis and prognosis. We also describe the added value of NfL compared to other biomarkers currently used to monitor the diseases described in this review.

Neurofilament Proteins as Biomarkers to Monitor Neurological Diseases and the Efficacy of Therapies

Biomarkers of neurodegeneration and neuronal injury have the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, disease monitoring, prognosis, and measure treatment efficacy. Neurofilament proteins (NfPs) are well suited as biomarkers in these contexts because they are major neuron-specific components that maintain structural integrity and are sensitive to neurodegeneration and neuronal injury across a wide range of neurologic diseases. Low levels of NfPs are constantly released from neurons into the extracellular space and ultimately reach the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood under physiological conditions throughout normal brain development, maturation, and aging. NfP levels in CSF and blood rise above normal in response to neuronal injury and neurodegeneration independently of cause. NfPs in CSF measured by lumbar puncture are about 40-fold more concentrated than in blood in healthy individuals. New ultra-sensitive methods now allow minimally invasive measurement of these low levels of NfPs in serum or plasma to track disease onset and progression in neurological disorders or nervous system injury and assess responses to therapeutic interventions. Any of the five Nf subunits - neurofilament light chain (NfL), neurofilament medium chain (NfM), neurofilament heavy chain (NfH), alpha-internexin (INA) and peripherin (PRPH) may be altered in a given neuropathological condition. In familial and sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD), plasma NfL levels may rise as early as 22 years before clinical onset in familial AD and 10 years before sporadic AD. The major determinants of elevated levels of NfPs and degradation fragments in CSF and blood are the magnitude of damaged or degenerating axons of fiber tracks, the affected axon caliber sizes and the rate of release of NfP and fragments at different stages of a given neurological disease or condition directly or indirectly affecting central nervous system (CNS) and/or peripheral nervous system (PNS). NfPs are rapidly emerging as transformative blood biomarkers in neurology providing novel insights into a wide range of neurological diseases and advancing clinical trials. Here we summarize the current understanding of intracellular NfP physiology, pathophysiology and extracellular kinetics of NfPs in biofluids and review the value and limitations of NfPs and degradation fragments as biomarkers of neurodegeneration and neuronal injury.

Serum neurofilament light and tau as prognostic markers for all-cause mortality in the elderly general population-an analysis from the MEMO study

BACKGROUND

Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a cytoskeletal protein component whose release into blood is indicative of neuronal damage. Tau is a microtubule-associated protein in neurons and strongly associated with overall brain degeneration. NfL and tau levels are associated with mortality in different neurological diseases, but studies in the general population are missing. We investigated whether NfL and tau serum levels could serve as prognostic markers for overall mortality in elderly individuals without pre-defined neurological conditions. Further, we investigated the cross-sectional associations between NfL, tau, neuropsychological functioning, and brain structures.

METHODS

In 1997, 385 inhabitants of Augsburg who were aged 65 years and older were included in the Memory and Morbidity in Augsburg Elderly (MEMO) study. They participated in a face-to-face medical interview including neuropsychological tests and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. NfL and tau were measured from non-fasting blood samples using highly sensitive single molecule array assays. To assess the prognostic accuracy of the biomarkers, concordance statistics based on the predicted 5-year survival probabilities were calculated for different Cox regression models. Associations between the biomarkers and the neuropsychological test scores or brain structures were investigated using linear or logistic regression.

RESULTS

NfL (HR 1.27, 95% CI [1.14-1.42]) and tau (1.20 [1.07-1.35]) serum levels were independently associated with all-cause mortality. NfL, but not tau, increased the prognostic accuracy when added to a model containing sociodemographic characteristics (concordance statistic 0.684 [0.612-0.755] vs. 0.663 [0.593-0.733]), but not when added to a model containing sociodemographic characteristics and brain atrophy or neuropsychological test scores. NfL serum levels were cross-sectionally associated with neuropsychological test scores and brain structures.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between NfL serum levels and brain atrophy and neuropsychological performance in individuals without overt neurological disease is similar to that seen in patients with neurodegenerative diseases. These findings support the concept of a continuum of physiological aging and incipient, subclinical pathology, and manifest disease. NfL, but not tau, serum levels might serve as a prognostic marker for all-cause mortality if no other clinical information is available.

Neurofilament light is a novel biomarker for mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes

Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes (MELAS) is a complicated maternally inherited disorder lacking of sensitive and specific biomarkers. The objective of this study was to investigate the serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) as a novel biomarker of neurological dysfunction in MELAS. Patients with different status of MELAS were enrolled in this study. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was given to the participants to evaluate cognition status. Multiple functional MRI was performed on the participants. Blood samples were collected and the serum NfL concentrations were determined by the single-molecule array technology (Simoa). This study enrolled 23 patients with MELAS, 15 people in the acute attack phase of MELAS and 10 people in the remission phase, including 2 patients in both acute attack and remission phase. Sixteen healthy controls (HCs) were also enrolled. Serum NfL level increased significantly in patients with MELAS. Serum NfL level in the acute attack group (146.73 [120.91–411.31] pg/ml, median [IQR]) was higher than in the remission group (40.31 [19.54–151.05] pg/ml, median [IQR]) and HCs group (7.70 [6.13–9.78] pg/ml, median [IQR]) (p < 0.05). The level of NfL in the remission phase group was higher than in HCs group (p < 0.05). A negative correlation was found between the serum NfL level and MMSE (p = 0.006, r = -0.650). The NfL concentration correlated positively with stroke-like lesion volume in the brain (r = 0.740, p < 0.001). Serum NfL may serve as a novel biomarker for the neurological dysfunction in MELAS patients.

Serum biomarkers in primary mitochondrial disorders

The aim of this study was to explore the utility of the serum biomarkers neurofilament light chain, fibroblast growth factor 21 and growth and differentiation factor 15 in diagnosing primary mitochondrial disorders. We measured serum neurofilament light chain, fibroblast growth factor 21 and growth and differentiation factor 15 in 26 patients with a genetically proven mitochondrial disease. Fibroblast growth factor 21 and growth and differentiation factor 15 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and neurofilament light chain with the Simoa assay. Neurofilament light chain was highest in patients with multi-systemic involvement that included the central nervous system such as those with the m.3242A>G mutation. Mean neurofilament light chain was also highest in patients with epilepsy versus those without [49.74 pg/ml versus 19.7 pg/ml (P = 0.015)], whereas fibroblast growth factor 21 and growth and differentiation factor 15 levels were highest in patients with prominent myopathy, such as those with single-mitochondrial DNA deletion. Our results suggest that the combination of neurofilament light chain, fibroblast growth factor 21 and growth and differentiation factor 15 is useful in the diagnostic evaluation of mitochondrial disease. Growth and differentiation factor 15 and fibroblast growth factor 21 identify those with muscle involvement, whereas neurofilament light chain is a clear marker for central nervous system involvement independent of underlying mitochondrial pathology. Levels of neurofilament light chain appear to correlate with the degree of ongoing damage suggesting, therefore, that monitoring neurofilament light chain levels may provide prognostic information and a way of monitoring disease activity.

Circulating Neurofilament Light Chain Is Associated With Survival After Pediatric Cardiac Arrest

OBJECTIVES

To characterize neurofilament light levels in children who achieved return of spontaneous circulation following cardiac arrest compared with healthy controls and determine an association between neurofilament light levels and clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic quaternary PICU.

PATIENTS

Children with banked plasma samples from an acute respiratory distress syndrome biomarker study who achieved return of spontaneous circulation after a cardiac arrest and healthy controls.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Neurofilament light levels were determined with a highly sensitive single molecule array digital immunoassay. Patients were categorized into survivors and nonsurvivors and into favorable (Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score of 1-2 or unchanged from baseline) or unfavorable (Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score of 3-6 or Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score change ≥1 from baseline). Associations between neurofilament light level and outcomes were determined using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. We enrolled 32 patients with cardiac arrest and 18 healthy controls. Demographics, severity of illness, and baseline Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scores were similar between survivors and nonsurvivors. Healthy controls had lower median neurofilament light levels than patients after cardiac arrest (5.5 [interquartile range 5.0-8.2] vs 31.0 [12.0-338.6]; p < 0.001). Neurofilament light levels were higher in nonsurvivors than survivors (78.5 [26.2-509.1] vs 12.4 [10.3-28.2]; p = 0.012) and higher in survivors than healthy controls (p = 0.009). The four patients who survived with a favorable outcome had neurofilament light levels that were not different from patients with unfavorable outcomes (21.9 [8.5--35.7] vs 37.2 [15.4-419.1]; p = 0.60) although two of the four patients who survived with favorable outcomes had progressive encephalopathies with both baseline and postcardiac arrest Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scores of 4.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurofilament light is a blood biomarker of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury and may help predict survival and neurologic outcome after pediatric cardiac arrest. Further study in a larger, dedicated cardiac arrest cohort with serial longitudinal measurements is warranted.