A Gradient of Template Dependence Defines Distinct Biological Roles for Family X Polymerases in Nonhomologous End Joining

Extension characteristics of TdT and its application in biosensors

The advantages of rapid amplification of nucleic acid without a template based on terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferase (TdT) have been widely used in the field of biosensors. However, the catalytic efficiency of TdT is affected by extension conditions. The sensitivity of TdT- mediated biosensors can be improved only under appropriate conditions. Therefore, in this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of TdT extension characteristics and its applications in biosensors. We focus on the relationship between TdT extension conditions and extension efficiency. Furthermore, the construction strategy of TdT-mediated biosensors according to five different recognition types and their applications in targets are discussed and, finally, several current challenges and prospects in the field are taken into consideration.

Dual activities of an X-family DNA polymerase regulate CRISPR-induced insertional mutagenesis across species

The canonical non-homologous end joining (c-NHEJ) repair pathway, generally viewed as stochastic, has recently been shown to produce predictable outcomes in CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis. This predictability, mainly in 1-bp insertions and small deletions, has led to the development of in-silico prediction programs for various animal species. However, the predictability of CRISPR-induced mutation profiles across species remained elusive. Comparing CRISPR-Cas9 repair outcomes between human and plant species reveals significant differences in 1-bp insertion profiles. The high predictability observed in human cells links to the template-dependent activity of human Polλ. Yet plant Polλ exhibits dual activities, generating 1-bp insertions through both templated and non-templated manners. Polλ knockout in plants leads to deletion-only mutations, while its overexpression enhances 1-bp insertion rates. Two conserved motifs are identified to modulate plant Polλ's dual activities. These findings unveil the mechanism behind species-specific CRISPR-Cas9-induced insertion profiles and offer strategies for predictable, precise genome editing through c-NHEJ.

Molecular mechanisms of DNA lesion and repair during antibody somatic hypermutation

Antibody diversification is essential for an effective immune response, with somatic hypermutation (SHM) serving as a key molecular process in this adaptation. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) initiates SHM by inducing DNA lesions, which are ultimately resolved into point mutations, as well as small insertions and deletions (indels). These mutational outcomes contribute to antibody affinity maturation. The mechanisms responsible for generating point mutations and indels involve the base excision repair (BER) and mismatch repair (MMR) pathways, which are well coordinated to maintain genomic integrity while allowing for beneficial mutations to occur. In this regard, translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases contribute to the diversity of mutational outcomes in antibody genes by enabling the bypass of DNA lesions. This review summarizes our current understanding of the distinct molecular mechanisms that generate point mutations and indels during SHM. Understanding these mechanisms is critical for elucidating the development of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) and autoantibodies, and has implications for vaccine design and therapeutics.

Up-Regulation of Non-Homologous End-Joining by MUC1

Ionizing radiation (IR) and chemotherapy with DNA-damaging drugs such as cisplatin are vital cancer treatment options. These treatments induce double-strand breaks (DSBs) as cytotoxic DNA damage; thus, the DSB repair activity in each cancer cell significantly influences the efficacy of the treatments. Pancreatic cancers are known to be resistant to these treatments, and the overexpression of MUC1, a member of the glycoprotein mucins, is associated with IR- and chemo-resistance. Therefore, we investigated the impact of MUC1 on DSB repair. This report examined the effect of the overexpression of MUC1 on homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) using cell-based DSB repair assays. In addition, the therapeutic potential of NHEJ inhibitors including HDAC inhibitors was also studied using pancreatic cancer cell lines. The MUC1-overexpression enhances NHEJ, while partially suppressing HR. Also, MUC1-overexpressed cancer cell lines are preferentially killed by a DNA-PK inhibitor and HDAC1/2 inhibitors. Altogether, MUC1 induces metabolic changes that create an imbalance between NHEJ and HR activities, and this imbalance can be a target for selective killing by HDAC inhibitors. This is a novel mechanism of MUC1-mediated IR-resistance and will form the basis for targeting MUC1-overexpressed pancreatic cancer.

DNA polymerase λ Loop1 variant yields unexpected gain-of-function capabilities in nonhomologous end-joining

DNA polymerases lambda (Polλ) and mu (Polμ) are X-Family polymerases that participate in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by the nonhomologous end-joining pathway (NHEJ). Both polymerases direct synthesis from one DSB end, using template derived from a second DSB end. In this way, they promote the NHEJ ligation step and minimize the sequence loss normally associated with this pathway. The two polymerases differ in cognate substrate, as Polλ is preferred when synthesis must be primed from a base-paired DSB end, while Polμ is required when synthesis must be primed from an unpaired DSB end. We generated a Polλ variant (PolλKGET) that retained canonical Polλ activity on a paired end-albeit with reduced incorporation fidelity. We recently discovered that the variant had unexpectedly acquired the activity previously unique to Polμ-synthesis from an unpaired primer terminus. Though the sidechains of the Loop1 region make no contact with the DNA substrate, PolλKGET Loop1 amino acid sequence is surprisingly essential for its unique activity during NHEJ. Taken together, these results underscore that the Loop1 region plays distinct roles in different Family X polymerases.

New Discoveries on Protein Recruitment and Regulation during the Early Stages of the DNA Damage Response Pathways

Maintaining genomic stability and properly repairing damaged DNA is essential to staying healthy and preserving cellular homeostasis. The five major pathways involved in repairing eukaryotic DNA include base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), mismatch repair (MMR), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), and homologous recombination (HR). When these pathways do not properly repair damaged DNA, genomic stability is compromised and can contribute to diseases such as cancer. It is essential that the causes of DNA damage and the consequent repair pathways are fully understood, yet the initial recruitment and regulation of DNA damage response proteins remains unclear. In this review, the causes of DNA damage, the various mechanisms of DNA damage repair, and the current research regarding the early steps of each major pathway were investigated.

The enzymatic properties of Arabidopsis thaliana DNA polymerase λ suggest a role in base excision repair

Base excision repair (BER) generates gapped DNA intermediates containing a 5'-terminal 2-deoxyribose-5-phosphate (5'-dRP) group. In mammalian cells, gap filling and dRP removal are catalyzed by Pol β, which belongs to the X family of DNA polymerases. In higher plants, the only member of the X family of DNA polymerases is Pol λ. Although it is generally believed that plant Pol λ participates in BER, there is limited experimental evidence for this hypothesis. Here we have characterized the biochemical properties of Arabidopsis thaliana Pol λ (AtPol λ) in a BER context, using a variety of DNA repair intermediates. We have found that AtPol λ performs gap filling inserting the correct nucleotide, and that the rate of nucleotide incorporation is higher in substrates containing a C in the template strand. Gap filling catalyzed by AtPol λ is most efficient with a phosphate at the 5'-end of the gap and is not inhibited by the presence of a 5'-dRP mimic. We also show that AtPol λ possesses an intrinsic dRP lyase activity that is reduced by mutations at two lysine residues in its 8-kDa domain, one of which is present in Pol λ exclusively and not in any Pol β homolog. Importantly, we also found that the dRP lyase activity of AtPol λ allows efficient completion of uracil repair in a reconstituted short-patch BER reaction. These results suggest that AtPol λ plays an important role in plant BER.

For the Better or for the Worse? The Effect of Manganese on the Activity of Eukaryotic DNA Polymerases

DNA polymerases constitute a versatile group of enzymes that not only perform the essential task of genome duplication but also participate in various genome maintenance pathways, such as base and nucleotide excision repair, non-homologous end-joining, homologous recombination, and translesion synthesis. Polymerases catalyze DNA synthesis via the stepwise addition of deoxynucleoside monophosphates to the 3' primer end in a partially double-stranded DNA. They require divalent metal cations coordinated by active site residues of the polymerase. Mg2+ is considered the likely physiological activator because of its high cellular concentration and ability to activate DNA polymerases universally. Mn2+ can also activate the known DNA polymerases, but in most cases, it causes a significant decrease in fidelity and/or processivity. Hence, Mn2+ has been considered mutagenic and irrelevant during normal cellular function. Intriguingly, a growing body of evidence indicates that Mn2+ can positively influence some DNA polymerases by conferring translesion synthesis activity or altering the substrate specificity. Here, we review the relevant literature focusing on the impact of Mn2+ on the biochemical activity of a selected set of polymerases, namely, Polβ, Polλ, and Polµ, of the X family, as well as Polι and Polη of the Y family of polymerases, where congruous data implicate the physiological relevance of Mn2+ in the cellular function of these enzymes.

The flexible and iterative steps within the NHEJ pathway

Cellular and biochemical studies of nonhomologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) have long established that nuclease and polymerase action are necessary for the repair of a very large fraction of naturally-arising double-strand breaks (DSBs). This conclusion is derived from NHEJ studies ranging from yeast to humans and all genetically-tractable model organisms. Biochemical models derived from recent real-time and structural studies have yet to incorporate physical space or timing for DNA end processing. In real-time single molecule FRET (smFRET) studies, we analyzed NHEJ synapsis of DNA ends in a defined biochemical system. We described a Flexible Synapsis (FS) state in which the DNA ends were in proximity via only Ku and XRCC4:DNA ligase 4 (X4L4), and in an orientation that would not yet permit ligation until base pairing between one or more nucleotides of microhomology (MH) occurred, thereby allowing an in-line Close Synapsis (CS) state. If no MH was achievable, then XLF was critical for ligation. Neither FS or CS required DNA-PKcs, unless Artemis activation was necessary to permit local resection and subsequent base pairing between the two DNA ends being joined. Here we conjecture on possible 3D configurations for this FS state, which would spatially accommodate the nuclease and polymerase processing steps in an iterative manner. The FS model permits repeated attempts at ligation of at least one strand at the DSB after each round of nuclease or polymerase action. In addition to activation of Artemis, other possible roles for DNA-PKcs are discussed.

CRISPR-based gene editing of non-homologous end joining factors biases DNA repair pathway choice toward single-strand annealing in Aedes aegypti

To maintain genome stability, eukaryotic cells orchestrate DNA repair pathways to process DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that result from diverse developmental or environmental stimuli. Bias in the selection of DSB repair pathways, either non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed repair (HDR), is also critical for efficient gene editing and for homing-based gene drive approaches developed for the control of disease-transmitting vector mosquitoes. However, little is understood about DNA repair homeostasis in the mosquito genome. Here, we utilized CRISPR/Cas9 to generate indel mutant strains for core NHEJ factors ku80, DNA ligase IV (lig4), and DNA-PKcs in the mosquito Aedes aegypti and evaluated the corresponding effects on DNA repair. In a plasmid-based assay, disruption of ku80 or lig4, but not DNA-PKcs, reduced both NHEJ and SSA. However, a transgenic reporter strain-based test revealed that those mutations significantly biased DNA repair events toward SSA. Interestingly, ku80 mutation also significantly increased the end joining rate by a yet-characterized mechanism in males. Our study provides evidence that the core NHEJ factors have an antagonistic effect on SSA-based DSB repair of the Ae. aegypti genome. Down-modulating the NHEJ pathway can enhance the efficiency of nuclease-based genetic control approaches, as most of those operate by homology-based repair processes along with extensive DNA end resection that is antagonized by NHEJ.

To indel or not to indel: Factors influencing mutagenesis during chromosomal break end joining

Chromosomal DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the effective lesion of radiotherapy and other clastogenic cancer therapeutics, and are also the initiating event of many approaches to gene editing. Ligation of the DSBs by end joining (EJ) pathways can restore the broken chromosome, but the repair junctions can have insertion/deletion (indel) mutations. The indel patterns resulting from DSB EJ are likely defined by the initial structure of the DNA ends, how the ends are processed and synapsed prior to ligation, and the factors that mediate the ligation step. In this review, we describe key factors that influence these steps of DSB EJ in mammalian cells, which is significant both for understanding mutagenesis resulting from clastogenic cancer therapeutics, and for developing approaches to manipulating gene editing outcomes.

Analysis of diverse double-strand break synapsis with Polλ reveals basis for unique substrate specificity in nonhomologous end-joining

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) threaten genomic stability, since their persistence can lead to loss of critical genetic information, chromosomal translocations or rearrangements, and cell death. DSBs can be repaired through the nonhomologous end-joining pathway (NHEJ), which processes and ligates DNA ends efficiently to prevent or minimize sequence loss. Polymerase λ (Polλ), one of the Family X polymerases, fills sequence gaps of DSB substrates with a strict specificity for a base-paired primer terminus. There is little information regarding Polλ's approach to engaging such substrates. We used in vitro polymerization and cell-based NHEJ assays to explore the contributions of conserved loop regions toward DSB substrate specificity and utilization. In addition, we present multiple crystal structures of Polλ in synapsis with varying biologically relevant DSB end configurations, revealing how key structural features and hydrogen bonding networks work in concert to stabilize these tenuous, potentially cytotoxic DNA lesions during NHEJ.

The origin of unwanted editing byproducts in gene editing

The rapid development of CRISPR-Cas genome editing tools has greatly changed the way to conduct research and holds tremendous promise for clinical applications. During genome editing, CRISPR-Cas enzymes induce DNA breaks at the target sites and subsequently the DNA repair pathways are recruited to generate diverse editing outcomes. Besides off-target cleavage, unwanted editing outcomes including chromosomal structural variations and exogenous DNA integrations have recently raised concerns for clinical safety. To eliminate these unwanted editing byproducts, we need to explore the underlying mechanisms for the formation of diverse editing outcomes from the perspective of DNA repair. Here, we describe the involved DNA repair pathways in sealing Cas enzyme-induced DNA double-stranded breaks and discuss the origins and effects of unwanted editing byproducts on genome stability. Furthermore, we propose the potential risk of inhibiting DNA repair pathways to enhance gene editing. The recent combined studies of DNA repair and CRISPR-Cas editing provide a framework for further optimizing genome editing to enhance editing safety.

DNA-PKcs-dependent phosphorylation of RECQL4 promotes NHEJ by stabilizing the NHEJ machinery at DNA double-strand breaks

Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is the major pathway that mediates the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) generated by ionizing radiation (IR). Previously, the DNA helicase RECQL4 was implicated in promoting NHEJ, but its role in the pathway remains unresolved. In this study, we report that RECQL4 stabilizes the NHEJ machinery at DSBs to promote repair. Specifically, we find that RECQL4 interacts with the NHEJ core factor DNA-PK_cs and the interaction is increased following IR. RECQL4 promotes DNA end bridging mediated by DNA-PK_cs and Ku70/80 in vitro and the accumulation/retention of NHEJ factors at DSBs in vivo. Moreover, interaction between DNA-PK_cs and the other core NHEJ proteins following IR treatment is attenuated in the absence of RECQL4. These data indicate that RECQL4 promotes the stabilization of the NHEJ factors at DSBs to support formation of the NHEJ long-range synaptic complex. In addition, we observed that the kinase activity of DNA-PK_cs is required for accumulation of RECQL4 to DSBs and that DNA-PK_cs phosphorylates RECQL4 at six serine/threonine residues. Blocking phosphorylation at these sites reduced the recruitment of RECQL4 to DSBs, attenuated the interaction between RECQL4 and NHEJ factors, destabilized interactions between the NHEJ machinery, and resulted in decreased NHEJ. Collectively, these data illustrate reciprocal regulation between RECQL4 and DNA-PK_cs in NHEJ.

Double-Stranded Break Repair in Mammalian Cells and Precise Genome Editing

In mammalian cells, double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired predominantly by error-prone non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), but less prevalently by error-free template-dependent homologous recombination (HR). DSB repair pathway selection is the bedrock for genome editing. NHEJ results in random mutations when repairing DSB, while HR induces high-fidelity sequence-specific variations, but with an undesirable low efficiency. In this review, we first discuss the latest insights into the action mode of NHEJ and HR in a panoramic view. We then propose the future direction of genome editing by virtue of these advancements. We suggest that by switching NHEJ to HR, full fidelity genome editing and robust gene knock-in could be enabled. We also envision that RNA molecules could be repurposed by RNA-templated DSB repair to mediate precise genetic editing.

Strategies for Enhancing the Homology-directed Repair Efficiency of CRISPR-Cas Systems

The CRISPR-Cas nuclease has emerged as a powerful genome-editing tool in recent years. The CRISPR-Cas system induces double-strand breaks that can be repaired via the non-homologous end joining or homology-directed repair (HDR) pathway. Compared to non-homologous end joining, HDR can be used for the treatment of incurable monogenetic diseases. Therefore, remarkable efforts have been dedicated to enhancing the efficacy of HDR. In this review, we summarize the currently used strategies for enhancing the HDR efficiency of CRISPR-Cas systems based on three factors: (1) regulation of the key factors in the DNA repair pathways, (2) modulation of the components in the CRISPR machinery, and (3) alteration of the intracellular environment around double-strand breaks. Representative cases and potential solutions for further improving HDR efficiency are also discussed, facilitating the development of new CRISPR technologies to achieve highly precise genetic manipulation in the future.

Crosstalk between different DNA repair pathways for DNA double strand break repairs

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are the most threatening type of DNA lesions and must be repaired properly in order to inhibit severe diseases and cell death. There are four major repair pathways for DSBs: non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination (HR), single strand annealing (SSA) and alternative end joining (alt-EJ). Cells choose repair pathway depending on the cell cycle phase and the length of 3' end of the DNA when DSBs are generated. Blunt and short regions of the 5' or 3' overhang DNA are repaired by NHEJ, which uses direct ligation or limited resection processing of the broken DNA end. In contrast, HR, SSA and alt-EJ use the resected DNA generated by the MRN (MRE11-RAD50-NBS1) complex and C-terminal binding protein interacting protein (CtIP) activated during the S and G2 phases. Here, we review recent findings on each repair pathway and the choice of repair mechanism and highlight the role of mismatch repair (MMR) protein in HR.

Diversity upon diversity: linking DNA double-strand break repair to blood cancer health disparities

Chromosomal translocations arising from aberrant repair of multiple DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are a defining characteristic of many cancers. DSBs are an essential part of physiological processes in antibody-producing B cells. The B cell environment is poised to generate genome instability leading to translocations relevant to the pathology of blood cancers. These are a diverse set of cancers, but limited data from under-represented groups have pointed to health disparities associated with each. We focus on the DSBs that occur in developing B cells and propose the most likely mechanism behind the formation of translocations. We also highlight specific cancers in which these rearrangements occur and address the growing concern of health disparities associated with them.

Take a Break to Repair: A Dip in the World of Double-Strand Break Repair Mechanisms Pointing the Gaze on Archaea

All organisms have evolved many DNA repair pathways to counteract the different types of DNA damages. The detection of DNA damage leads to distinct cellular responses that bring about cell cycle arrest and the induction of DNA repair mechanisms. In particular, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are extremely toxic for cell survival, that is why cells use specific mechanisms of DNA repair in order to maintain genome stability. The choice among the repair pathways is mainly linked to the cell cycle phases. Indeed, if it occurs in an inappropriate cellular context, it may cause genome rearrangements, giving rise to many types of human diseases, from developmental disorders to cancer. Here, we analyze the most recent remarks about the main pathways of DSB repair with the focus on homologous recombination. A thorough knowledge in DNA repair mechanisms is pivotal for identifying the most accurate treatments in human diseases.

The mechanisms of human lymphoid chromosomal translocations and their medical relevance

The most common human lymphoid chromosomal translocations involve concurrent failures of the recombination activating gene (RAG) complex and Activation-Induced Deaminase (AID). These are two enzymes that are normally expressed for purposes of the two site-specific DNA recombination processes: V(D)J recombination and class switch recombination (CSR). First, though it is rare, a low level of expression of AID can introduce long-lived T:G mismatch lesions at 20-600 bp fragile zones. Second, the V(D)J recombination process can occasionally fail to rejoin coding ends, and this failure may permit an opportunity for Artemis:DNA-dependent kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) to convert the T:G mismatch sites at the fragile zones into double-strand breaks. The 20-600 bp fragile zones must be, at least transiently, in a single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) state for the first step to occur, because AID only acts on ssDNA. Here we discuss the key DNA sequence features that lead to AID action at a fragile zone, which are (a) the proximity and density of strings of cytosine nucleotides (C-strings) that cause a B/A-intermediate DNA conformation; (b) overlapping AID hotspots that contain a methyl CpG (WRCG), which AID converts to a long-lived T:G mismatch; and (c) transcription, which, though not essential, favors increased ssDNA in the fragile zone. We also summarize chromosomal features of the focal fragile zones in lymphoid malignancies and discuss the clinical relevance of understanding the translocation mechanisms. Many of the key principles covered here are also relevant to chromosomal translocations in non-lymphoid somatic cells as well.

Mechanistic Insights From Single-Molecule Studies of Repair of Double Strand Breaks

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are among some of the most deleterious forms of DNA damage. Left unrepaired, they are detrimental to genome stability, leading to high risk of cancer. Two major mechanisms are responsible for the repair of DSBs, homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). The complex nature of both pathways, involving a myriad of protein factors functioning in a highly coordinated manner at distinct stages of repair, lend themselves to detailed mechanistic studies using the latest single-molecule techniques. In avoiding ensemble averaging effects inherent to traditional biochemical or genetic methods, single-molecule studies have painted an increasingly detailed picture for every step of the DSB repair processes.

Transcription-coupled DNA double-strand break repair

The genomic DNA is constantly under attack by cellular and/or environmental factors. Fortunately, the cell is armed to safeguard its genome by various mechanisms such as nucleotide excision, base excision, mismatch and DNA double-strand break repairs. While these processes maintain the integrity of the genome throughout, DNA repair occurs preferentially faster at the transcriptionally active genes. Such transcription-coupled repair phenomenon plays important roles to maintain active genome integrity, failure of which would interfere with transcription, leading to an altered gene expression (and hence cellular pathologies/diseases). Among the various DNA damages, DNA double-strand breaks are quite toxic to the cells. If DNA double-strand break occurs at the active gene, it would interfere with transcription/gene expression, thus threatening cellular viability. Such DNA double-strand breaks are found to be repaired faster at the active gene in comparison to its inactive state or the inactive gene, thus supporting the existence of a new phenomenon of transcription-coupled DNA double-strand break repair. Here, we describe the advances of this repair process.

Mechanism of genome instability mediated by human DNA polymerase mu misincorporation

Pol μ is capable of performing gap-filling repair synthesis in the nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway. Together with DNA ligase, misincorporation of dGTP opposite the templating T by Pol μ results in a promutagenic T:G mispair, leading to genomic instability. Here, crystal structures and kinetics of Pol μ substituting dGTP for dATP on gapped DNA substrates containing templating T were determined and compared. Pol μ is highly mutagenic on a 2-nt gapped DNA substrate, with T:dGTP base pairing at the 3' end of the gap. Two residues (Lys438 and Gln441) interact with T:dGTP and fine tune the active site microenvironments. The in-crystal misincorporation reaction of Pol μ revealed an unexpected second dGTP in the active site, suggesting its potential mutagenic role among human X family polymerases in NHEJ.

Mini review: Enzyme-based DNA synthesis and selective retrieval for data storage

The market for using and storing digital data is growing, with DNA synthesis emerging as an efficient way to store massive amounts of data. Storing information in DNA mainly consists of two steps: data writing and reading. The writing step requires encoding data in DNA, building one nucleotide at a time as a form of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Once the data needs to be read, the target DNA is selectively retrieved and sequenced, which will also be in the form of an ssDNA. Recently, enzyme-based DNA synthesis is emerging as a new method to be a breakthrough on behalf of decades-old chemical synthesis. A few enzymatic methods have been presented for data memory, including the use of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase. Besides, enzyme-based amplification or denaturation of the target strand into ssDNA provides selective access to the desired dataset. In this review, we summarize diverse enzymatic methods for either synthesizing ssDNA or retrieving the data-containing DNA.

Small Molecule Inhibitors Targeting Key Proteins in the DNA Damage Response for Cancer Therapy

DNA damage response (DDR) is a complicated interactional pathway. Defects that occur in subordinate pathways of the DDR pathway can lead to genomic instability and cancer susceptibility. Abnormal expression of some proteins in DDR, especially in the DNA repair pathway, are associated with the subsistence and resistance of cancer cells. Therefore, the development of small molecule inhibitors targeting the chief proteins in the DDR pathway is an effective strategy for cancer therapy. In this review, we summarize the development of small molecule inhibitors targeting chief proteins in the DDR pathway, particularly focusing on their implications for cancer therapy. We present the action mode of DDR molecule inhibitors in preclinical studies and clinical cancer therapy, including monotherapy and combination therapy with chemotherapeutic drugs or checkpoint suppression therapy.

DNA polymerase mu: An inflexible scaffold for substrate flexibility

DNA polymerase μ is a Family X member that participates in repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) by non-homologous end joining. Its role is to fill short gaps arising as intermediates in the process of V(D)J recombination and during processing of accidental double strand breaks. Pol μ is the only known template-dependent polymerase that can repair non-complementary DSBs with unpaired 3´primer termini. Here we review the unique properties of Pol μ that allow it to productively engage such a highly unstable substrate to generate a nick that can be sealed by DNA Ligase IV.

Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks by the Nonhomologous End Joining Pathway

DNA double-strand breaks pose a serious threat to genome stability. In vertebrates, these breaks are predominantly repaired by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), which pairs DNA ends in a multiprotein synaptic complex to promote their direct ligation. NHEJ is a highly versatile pathway that uses an array of processing enzymes to modify damaged DNA ends and enable their ligation. The mechanisms of end synapsis and end processing have important implications for genome stability. Rapid and stable synapsis is necessary to limit chromosome translocations that result from the mispairing of DNA ends. Furthermore, end processing must be tightly regulated to minimize mutations at the break site. Here, we review our current mechanistic understanding of vertebrate NHEJ, with a particular focus on end synapsis and processing.

A novel role of DNA polymerase λ in translesion synthesis in conjunction with DNA polymerase ζ

As an integral scaffolding component of DNA polymerase (Pol) zeta, Pol lambda adapts Pol zeta–dependent translesion synthesis to operate in a predominantly error-free manner in human cells.

By extending synthesis opposite from a diverse array of DNA lesions, DNA polymerase (Pol) ζ performs a crucial role in translesion synthesis (TLS). In yeast and cancer cells, Rev1 functions as an indispensable scaffolding component of Polζ and it imposes highly error-prone TLS upon Polζ. However, for TLS that occurs during replication in normal human cells, Rev1 functions instead as a scaffolding component of Pols η, ι, and κ and Rev1-dependent TLS by these Pols operates in a predominantly error-free manner. The lack of Rev1 requirement for Polζ function in TLS in normal cells suggested that some other protein substitutes for this Rev1 role. Here, we identify a novel role of Polλ as an indispensable scaffolding component of Polζ. TLS studies opposite a number of DNA lesions support the conclusion that as an integral component, Polλ adapts Polζ-dependent TLS to operate in a predominantly error-free manner in human cells, essential for genome integrity and cellular homeostasis.

The molecular basis and disease relevance of non-homologous DNA end joining

Non-homologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) is the predominant repair mechanism of any type of DNA double-strand break (DSB) during most of the cell cycle and is essential for the development of antigen receptors. Defects in NHEJ result in sensitivity to ionizing radiation and loss of lymphocytes. The most critical step of NHEJ is synapsis, or the juxtaposition of the two DNA ends of a DSB, because all subsequent steps rely on it. Recent findings show that, like the end processing step, synapsis can be achieved through several mechanisms. In this Review, we first discuss repair pathway choice between NHEJ and other DSB repair pathways. We then integrate recent insights into the mechanisms of NHEJ synapsis with updates on other steps of NHEJ, such as DNA end processing and ligation. Finally, we discuss NHEJ-related human diseases, including inherited disorders and neoplasia, which arise from rare failures at different NHEJ steps.

Structural snapshots of human DNA polymerase μ engaged on a DNA double-strand break

Genomic integrity is threatened by cytotoxic DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), which must be resolved efficiently to prevent sequence loss, chromosomal rearrangements/translocations, or cell death. Polymerase μ (Polμ) participates in DSB repair via the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway, by filling small sequence gaps in broken ends to create substrates ultimately ligatable by DNA Ligase IV. Here we present structures of human Polμ engaging a DSB substrate. Synapsis is mediated solely by Polμ, facilitated by single-nucleotide homology at the break site, wherein both ends of the discontinuous template strand are stabilized by a hydrogen bonding network. The active site in the quaternary Pol μ complex is poised for catalysis and nucleotide incoporation proceeds in crystallo. These structures demonstrate that Polμ may address complementary DSB substrates during NHEJ in a manner indistinguishable from single-strand breaks.

The Chromatin Response to Double-Strand DNA Breaks and Their Repair

Cellular DNA is constantly being damaged by numerous internal and external mutagenic factors. Probably the most severe type of insults DNA could suffer are the double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs). They sever both DNA strands and compromise genomic stability, causing deleterious chromosomal aberrations that are implicated in numerous maladies, including cancer. Not surprisingly, cells have evolved several DSB repair pathways encompassing hundreds of different DNA repair proteins to cope with this challenge. In eukaryotic cells, DSB repair is fulfilled in the immensely complex environment of the chromatin. The chromatin is not just a passive background that accommodates the multitude of DNA repair proteins, but it is a highly dynamic and active participant in the repair process. Chromatin alterations, such as changing patterns of histone modifications shaped by numerous histone-modifying enzymes and chromatin remodeling, are pivotal for proficient DSB repair. Dynamic chromatin changes ensure accessibility to the damaged region, recruit DNA repair proteins, and regulate their association and activity, contributing to DSB repair pathway choice and coordination. Given the paramount importance of DSB repair in tumorigenesis and cancer progression, DSB repair has turned into an attractive target for the development of novel anticancer therapies, some of which have already entered the clinic.

Polymerase μ in non-homologous DNA end joining: importance of the order of arrival at a double-strand break in a purified system

During non-homologous DNA end joining (NHEJ), bringing two broken dsDNA ends into proximity is an essential prerequisite for ligation by XRCC4:Ligase IV (X4L4). This physical juxtaposition of DNA ends is called NHEJ synapsis. In addition to the key NHEJ synapsis proteins, Ku, X4L4, and XLF, it has been suggested that DNA polymerase mu (pol μ) may also align two dsDNA ends into close proximity for synthesis. Here, we directly observe the NHEJ synapsis by pol μ using a single molecule FRET (smFRET) assay where we can measure the duration of the synapsis. The results show that pol μ alone can mediate efficient NHEJ synapsis of 3′ overhangs that have at least 1 nt microhomology. The abundant Ku protein in cells limits the accessibility of pol μ to DNA ends with overhangs. But X4L4 can largely reverse the Ku inhibition, perhaps by pushing the Ku inward to expose the overhang for NHEJ synapsis. Based on these studies, the mechanistic flexibility known to exist at other steps of NHEJ is now also apparent for the NHEJ synapsis step.

Improving Precise CRISPR Genome Editing by Small Molecules: Is there a Magic Potion?

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) genome editing has become a standard method in molecular biology, for the establishment of genetically modified cellular and animal models, for the identification and validation of drug targets in animals, and is heavily tested for use in gene therapy of humans. While the efficiency of CRISPR mediated gene targeting is much higher than of classical targeted mutagenesis, the efficiency of CRISPR genome editing to introduce defined changes into the genome is still low. Overcoming this problem will have a great impact on the use of CRISPR genome editing in academic and industrial research and the clinic. This review will present efforts to achieve this goal by small molecules, which modify the DNA repair mechanisms to facilitate the precise alteration of the genome.

"An End to a Means": How DNA-End Structure Shapes the Double-Strand Break Repair Process

Endogenously-arising DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) rarely harbor canonical 5′-phosphate, 3′-hydroxyl moieties at the ends, which are, regardless of the pathway used, ultimately required for their repair. Cells are therefore endowed with a wide variety of enzymes that can deal with these chemical and structural variations and guarantee the formation of ligatable termini. An important distinction is whether the ends are directly “unblocked” by specific enzymatic activities without affecting the integrity of the DNA molecule and its sequence, or whether they are “processed” by unspecific nucleases that remove nucleotides from the termini. DNA end structure and configuration, therefore, shape the repair process, its requirements, and, importantly, its final outcome. Thus, the molecular mechanisms that coordinate and integrate the cellular response to blocked DSBs, although still largely unexplored, can be particularly relevant for maintaining genome integrity and avoiding malignant transformation and cancer.

A Mechanism to Minimize Errors during Non-homologous End Joining

Enzymatic processing of DNA underlies all DNA repair, yet inappropriate DNA processing must be avoided. In vertebrates, double-strand breaks are repaired predominantly by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), which directly ligates DNA ends. NHEJ has the potential to be highly mutagenic because it uses DNA polymerases, nucleases, and other enzymes that modify incompatible DNA ends to allow their ligation. Using frog egg extracts that recapitulate NHEJ, we show that end processing requires the formation of a "short-range synaptic complex" in which DNA ends are closely aligned in a ligation-competent state. Furthermore, single-molecule imaging directly demonstrates that processing occurs within the short-range complex. This confinement of end processing to a ligation-competent complex ensures that DNA ends undergo ligation as soon as they become compatible, thereby minimizing mutagenesis. Our results illustrate how the coordination of enzymatic catalysis with higher-order structural organization of substrate maximizes the fidelity of DNA repair.

Unexpected behavior of DNA polymerase Mu opposite template 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-guanosine

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) resulting from reactive oxygen species generated by exposure to UV and ionizing radiation are characterized by clusters of lesions near break sites. Such complex DSBs are repaired slowly, and their persistence can have severe consequences for human health. We have therefore probed DNA break repair containing a template 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-guanosine (8OG) by Family X Polymerase μ (Pol μ) in steady-state kinetics and cell-based assays. Pol μ tolerates 8OG-containing template DNA substrates, and the filled products can be subsequently ligated by DNA Ligase IV during Nonhomologous end-joining. Furthermore, Pol μ exhibits a strong preference for mutagenic bypass of 8OG by insertion of adenine. Crystal structures reveal that the template 8OG is accommodated in the Pol μ active site with none of the DNA substrate distortions observed for Family X siblings Pols β or λ. Kinetic characterization of template 8OG bypass indicates that Pol μ inserts adenosine nucleotides with weak sugar selectivity and, given the high cellular concentration of ATP, likely performs its role in repair of complex 8OG-containing DSBs using ribonucleotides.

Necessities in the Processing of DNA Double Strand Breaks and Their Effects on Genomic Instability and Cancer

Double strand breaks (DSBs) are induced in the DNA following exposure of cells to ionizing radiation (IR) and are highly consequential for genome integrity, requiring highly specialized modes of processing. Erroneous processing of DSBs is a cause of cell death or its transformation to a cancer cell. Four mechanistically distinct pathways have evolved in cells of higher eukaryotes to process DSBs, providing thus multiple options for the damaged cells. The homologous recombination repair (HRR) dependent subway of gene conversion (GC) removes IR-induced DSBs from the genome in an error-free manner. Classical non-homologous end joining (c-NHEJ) removes DSBs with very high speed but is unable to restore the sequence at the generated junction and can catalyze the formation of translocations. Alternative end-joining (alt-EJ) operates on similar principles as c-NHEJ but is slower and more error-prone regarding both sequence preservation and translocation formation. Finally, single strand annealing (SSA) is associated with large deletions and may also form translocations. Thus, the four pathways available for the processing of DSBs are not alternative options producing equivalent outcomes. We discuss the rationale for the evolution of pathways with such divergent properties and fidelities and outline the logic and necessities that govern their engagement. We reason that cells are not free to choose one specific pathway for the processing of a DSB but rather that they engage a pathway by applying the logic of highest fidelity selection, adapted to necessities imposed by the character of the DSB being processed. We introduce DSB clusters as a particularly consequential form of chromatin breakage and review findings suggesting that this form of damage underpins the increased efficacy of high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation modalities. The concepts developed have implications for the protection of humans from radon-induced cancer, as well as the treatment of cancer with radiations of high LET.

Plant organellar DNA polymerases repair double-stranded breaks by microhomology-mediated end-joining

Double-stranded breaks (DSBs) in plant organelles are repaired via genomic rearrangements characterized by microhomologous repeats. These microhomologous signatures predict the existence of an unidentified enzymatic machinery capable of repairing of DSBs via microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) in plant organelles. Here, we show that organellar DNA polymerases from Arabidopsis thaliana (AtPolIA and AtPolIB) perform MMEJ using microhomologous sequences as short as six nucleotides. AtPolIs execute MMEJ by virtue of two specialized amino acid insertions located in their thumb subdomains. Single-stranded binding proteins (SSBs) unique to plants, AtWhirly2 and organellar single-stranded binding proteins (AtOSBs), hinder MMEJ, whereas canonical mitochondrial SSBs (AtmtSSB1 and AtmtSSB2) do not interfere with MMEJ. Our data predict that organellar DNA rearrangements by MMEJ are a consequence of a competition for the 3'-OH of a DSBs. If AtWhirlies or AtOSBs gain access to the single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) region of a DSB, the reaction will shift towards high-fidelity routes like homologous recombination. Conversely MMEJ would be favored if AtPolIs or AtmtSSBs interact with the DSB. AtPolIs are not phylogenetically related to metazoan mitochondrial DNA polymerases, and the ability of AtPolIs to execute MMEJ may explain the abundance of DNA rearrangements in plant organelles in comparison to animal mitochondria.

Enzymatic synthesis and modification of high molecular weight DNA using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase

The recognition that nucleic acids can be used as polymeric materials led to the blossoming of the field of DNA nanotechnology, with a broad range of applications in biotechnology, biosensors, diagnostics, and drug delivery. These applications require efficient methods to synthesize and chemically modify high molecular weight DNA. Here, we discuss terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-catalyzed enzymatic polymerization (TcEP) as an alternative to conventional enzymatic and solid-phase DNA synthesis. We describe biochemical requirements for TcEP and provide step-by-step protocols to carry out TcEP in solution and from surfaces.

An array of basic residues is essential for the nucleolytic activity of the PHP domain of bacterial/archaeal PolX DNA polymerases

Bacterial/archaeal family X DNA polymerases (PolXs) have a C-terminal PHP domain with an active site formed by nine histidines and aspartates that catalyzes 3′-5′ exonuclease, AP-endonuclease, 3′-phosphodiesterase and 3′-phosphatase activities. Multiple sequence alignments have allowed us to identify additional highly conserved residues along the PHP domain of bacterial/archaeal PolXs that form an electropositive path to the catalytic site and whose potential role in the nucleolytic activities had not been established. Here, site directed mutagenesis at the corresponding Bacillus subtilis PolX (PolXBs) residues, Arg⁴⁶⁹, Arg⁴⁷⁴, Asn⁴⁹⁸, Arg⁵⁰³ and Lys⁵⁴⁵, as well as to the highly conserved residue Phe⁴⁴⁰ gave rise to enzymes severely affected in all the nucleolytic activities of the enzyme while conserving a wild-type gap-filling activity, indicating a function of those residues in DNA binding at the PHP domain. Altogether, the results obtained with the mutant proteins, the spatial arrangement of those DNA binding residues, the intermolecular transference of the 3′-terminus between the PHP and polymerization active sites, and the available 3D structures of bacterial PolXs led us to propose the requirement to a great degree of a functional/structural flexibility to coordinate the synthetic and degradative activities in these enzymes.

DNA polymerase beta participates in DNA End-joining

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are one of the most deleterious lesions and if left unrepaired, they lead to cell death, genomic instability and carcinogenesis. Cells combat DSBs by two pathways: homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), wherein the two DNA ends are re-joined. Recently a back-up NHEJ pathway has been reported and is referred to as alternative NHEJ (aNHEJ), which joins ends but results in deletions and insertions. NHEJ requires processing enzymes including nucleases and polymerases, although the roles of these enzymes are poorly understood. Emerging evidence indicates that X family DNA polymerases lambda (Pol λ) and mu (Pol μ) promote DNA end-joining. Here, we show that DNA polymerase beta (Pol β), another member of the X family of DNA polymerases, plays a role in aNHEJ. In the absence of DNA Pol β, fewer small deletions are observed. In addition, depletion of Pol β results in cellular sensitivity to bleomycin and DNA protein kinase catalytic subunit inhibitors due to defective repair of DSBs. In summary, our results indicate that Pol β in functions in aNHEJ and provide mechanistic insight into its role in this process.

Structural evidence for an in trans base selection mechanism involving Loop1 in polymerase μ at an NHEJ double-strand break junction

Eukaryotic DNA polymerase (Pol) X family members such as Pol μ and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) are important components for the nonhomologous DNA end-joining (NHEJ) pathway. TdT participates in a specialized version of NHEJ, V(D)J recombination. It has primarily nontemplated polymerase activity but can take instructions across strands from the downstream dsDNA, and both activities are highly dependent on a structural element called Loop1. However, it is unclear whether Pol μ follows the same mechanism, because the structure of its Loop1 is disordered in available structures. Here, we used a chimeric TdT harboring Loop1 of Pol μ that recapitulated the functional properties of Pol μ in ligation experiments. We solved three crystal structures of this TdT chimera bound to several DNA substrates at 1.96-2.55 Å resolutions, including a full DNA double-strand break (DSB) synapsis. We then modeled the full Pol μ sequence in the context of one these complexes. The atomic structure of an NHEJ junction with a Pol X construct that mimics Pol μ in a reconstituted system explained the distinctive properties of Pol μ compared with TdT. The structure suggested a mechanism of base selection relying on Loop1 and taking instructions via the in trans templating base independently of the primer strand. We conclude that our atomic-level structural observations represent a paradigm shift for the mechanism of base selection in the Pol X family of DNA polymerases.

Human DNA Polymerase μ Can Use a Noncanonical Mechanism for Multiple Mn2+-Mediated Functions

Recent research on the structure and mechanism of DNA polymerases has continued to generate fundamentally important features, including a noncanonical pathway involving "prebinding" of metal-bound dNTP (MdNTP) in the absence of DNA. While this noncanonical mechanism was shown to be a possible subset for African swine fever DNA polymerase X (Pol X) and human Pol λ, it remains unknown whether it could be the primary pathway for a DNA polymerase. Pol μ is a unique member of the X-family with multiple functions and with unusual Mn²⁺ preference. Here we report that Pol μ not only prebinds MdNTP in a catalytically active conformation but also exerts a Mn²⁺ over Mg²⁺ preference at this early stage of catalysis, for various functions: incorporation of dNTP into a single nucleotide gapped DNA, incorporation of rNTP in the nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) repair, incorporation of dNTP to an ssDNA, and incorporation of an 8-oxo-dGTP opposite template dA (mismatched) or dC (matched). The structural basis of this noncanonical mechanism and Mn²⁺ over Mg²⁺ preference in these functions was analyzed by solving 19 structures of prebinding binary complexes, precatalytic ternary complexes, and product complexes. The results suggest that the noncanonical pathway is functionally relevant for the multiple functions of Pol μ. Overall, this work provides the structural and mechanistic basis for the long-standing puzzle in the Mn²⁺ preference of Pol μ and expands the landscape of the possible mechanisms of DNA polymerases to include both mechanistic pathways.

Plugged into the Ku-DNA hub: The NHEJ network

In vertebrates, double-strand breaks in DNA are primarily repaired by Non-Homologous End-Joining (NHEJ). The ring-shaped Ku heterodimer rapidly senses and threads onto broken DNA ends forming a recruiting hub. Through protein-protein contacts eventually reinforced by protein-DNA interactions, the Ku-DNA hub attracts a series of specialized proteins with scaffolding and/or enzymatic properties. To shed light on these dynamic interplays, we review here current knowledge on proteins directly interacting with Ku and on the contact points involved, with a particular accent on the different classes of Ku-binding motifs identified in several Ku partners. An integrated structural model of the core NHEJ network at the synapsis step is proposed.

Deployment of DNA polymerases beta and lambda in single-nucleotide and multinucleotide pathways of mammalian base excision DNA repair

There exist two major base excision DNA repair (BER) pathways, namely single-nucleotide or "short-patch" (SP-BER), and "long-patch" BER (LP-BER). Both pathways appear to be involved in the repair of small base lesions such as uracil, abasic sites and oxidized bases. In addition to DNA polymerase β (Polβ) as the main BER enzyme for repair synthesis, there is evidence for a minor role for DNA polymerase lambda (Polλ) in BER. In this study we explore the potential contribution of Polλ to both SP- and LP-BER in cell-free extracts. We measured BER activity in extracts of mouse embryonic fibroblasts using substrates with either a single uracil or the chemically stable abasic site analog tetrahydrofuran residue. The addition of purified Polλ complemented the pronounced BER deficiency of POLB-null cell extracts as efficiently as did Polβ itself. We have developed a new approach for determining the relative contributions of SP- and LP-BER pathways, exploiting mass-labeled nucleotides to distinguish single- and multinucleotide repair patches. Using this method, we found that uracil repair in wild-type and in Polβ-deficient cell extracts supplemented with Polλ was ∼80% SP-BER. The results show that recombinant Polλ can contribute to both SP- and LP-BER. However, endogenous Polλ, which is present at a level ˜50% that of Polβ in mouse embryonic fibroblasts, appears to make little contribution to BER in extracts. Thus Polλ in cells appears to be under some constraint, perhaps sequestered in a complex with other proteins, or post-translationally modified in a way that limits its ability to participate effectively in BER.

PAXX and its paralogs synergistically direct DNA polymerase λ activity in DNA repair

PAXX is a recently identified component of the nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) DNA repair pathway. The molecular mechanisms of PAXX action remain largely unclear. Here we characterise the interactomes of PAXX and its paralogs, XLF and XRCC4, to show that these factors share the ability to interact with DNA polymerase λ (Pol λ), stimulate its activity and are required for recruitment of Pol λ to laser-induced DNA damage sites. Stimulation of Pol λ activity by XRCC4 paralogs requires a direct interaction between the SP/8 kDa domain of Pol λ and their N-terminal head domains to facilitate recognition of the 5′ end of substrate gaps. Furthermore, PAXX and XLF collaborate with Pol λ to promote joining of incompatible DNA ends and are redundant in supporting Pol λ function in vivo. Our findings identify Pol λ as a novel downstream effector of PAXX function and show XRCC4 paralogs act in synergy to regulate polymerase activity in NHEJ.

PAXX functions as part of the nonhomologous end-joining pathway to repair double-strand DNA breaks. Here the authors show PAXX and its paralogs interact with polymerase lambda to promote joining of incompatible ends.

Ribonucleotide incorporation enables repair of chromosome breaks by nonhomologous end joining

The nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway preserves genome stability by ligating the ends of broken chromosomes together. It employs end-processing enzymes, including polymerases, to prepare ends for ligation. We show that two such polymerases incorporate primarily ribonucleotides during NHEJ-an exception to the central dogma of molecular biology-both during repair of chromosome breaks made by Cas9 and during V(D)J recombination. Moreover, additions of ribonucleotides but not deoxynucleotides effectively promote ligation. Repair kinetics suggest that ribonucleotide-dependent first-strand ligation is followed by complementary strand repair with deoxynucleotides, then by replacement of ribonucleotides embedded in the first strand with deoxynucleotides. Our results indicate that as much as 65% of cellular NHEJ products have transiently embedded ribonucleotides, which promote flexibility in repair at the cost of more fragile intermediates.

DNA Ligase IV Guides End-Processing Choice during Nonhomologous End Joining

Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) must adapt to diverse end structures during repair of chromosome breaks. Here, we investigate the mechanistic basis for this flexibility. DNA ends are aligned in a paired-end complex (PEC) by Ku, XLF, XRCC4, and DNA ligase IV (LIG4); we show by single-molecule analysis how terminal mispairs lead to mobilization of ends within PECs and consequent sampling of more end-alignment configurations. This remodeling is essential for direct ligation of damaged and mispaired ends during cellular NHEJ, since remodeling and ligation of such ends both require a LIG4-specific structural motif, insert1. Insert1 is also required for PEC remodeling that enables nucleolytic processing when end structures block direct ligation. Accordingly, cells expressing LIG4 lacking insert1 are sensitive to ionizing radiation. Cellular NHEJ of diverse ends thus identifies the steps necessary for repair through LIG4-mediated sensing of differences in end structure and consequent dynamic remodeling of aligned ends.