ADAR1: A New Target for Immuno-oncology Therapy

Pan-cancer analysis of ADAR1 with its prognostic relevance in low-grade glioma

ADAR1, known as the primary enzyme for adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing, has recently been implicated in cancer development through both RNA editing-dependent and -independent pathways. These discoveries suggest that ADAR1's functions may extend beyond our current understanding. A pan-cancer analysis offers a unique opportunity to identify both common and distinct mechanisms across various cancers, thereby advancing personalized medicine. Low-grade glioma (LGG), characterized by a diverse group of tumor cells, presents a challenge in risk stratification, leading to significant variations in treatment approaches. Recently discovered molecular alterations in LGG have helped to refine the stratification of of these tumors and offered novel targets for predicting likely outcomes. This study aims to provide a detailed analysis of ADAR mRNA across multiple cancers, emphasizing its prognostic significance in LGG. We observed inconsistent mRNA and consistent protein expression patterns of ADAR1/ADAR in pan-cancer analyses that across tumor types. ADAR mRNA expression did not always correlate with ADAR1 protein expression. Nevertheless, the transcript levels correlated significantly with genetic alterations, tumor mutation burden, microsatellite instability, overall survival, recurrence-free survival, immune marker presence, immune infiltration, and the survival of patients undergoing immunotherapy in select cancers. Furthermore, ADAR and its top 50 associated genes were primarily involved in mRNA-related events, as identified through Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analyses. Utilizing the Cox proportional hazards model, we developed a 3-gene signature (ADAR, HNRNPK, and SMG7), which effectively stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups, with high-risk patients exhibiting poorer overall survival, higher tumor grades, and a greater number of non-codeletions. Overall, this signature was inversely related to immune infiltration across cancers. Transcription factor SPI1 and miR-206, potential upstream regulators of the signature genes, were closely linked to patient survival in LGG. The promoter regions of these genes were hypermethylated, further associating them with patient outcomes. Additionally, these genes displayed consistent drug susceptibility patterns. In conclusion, our findings reveal multiple aspects of ADAR1's role in cancer and underscore its prognostic value in LGG, offering insights into potential therapeutic targets and strategies.

Dichotomous roles of ADAR1 in liver hepatocellular carcinoma and kidney renal cell carcinoma: Unraveling the complex tumor microenvironment and prognostic significance

BACKGROUND

Adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) is an RNA-editing enzyme that significantly impacts cancer progression and various biological processes. The expression of ADAR1 mRNA has been examined in multiple cancer types using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset, revealing distinct patterns in kidney chromophobe (KICH), kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC), kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma (KIRP), and liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) compared to normal controls. However, the reasons for these differential expressions remain unclear.

METHODS

In this study, we performed RT-PCR and western blotting (WB) to validate ADAR1 expression patterns in clinical tissue samples. Survival analysis and immune microenvironment analysis (including immune score and stromal score) were conducted using TCGA data to determine the specific cell types associated with ADAR1, as well as the key genes in those cell types. The relationship between ADAR1 and specific cell types' key genes was verified by immunohistochemistry (IHC), using clinical liver and kidney cancer samples.

RESULTS

Our validation analysis revealed that ADAR1 expression was downregulated in KICH, KIRC, and KIRP, while upregulated in LIHC compared to normal tissues. Notably, a significant correlation was found between ADAR1 mRNA expression and patient prognosis, particularly in KIRC, KIRP, and LIHC. Interestingly, we observed a positive correlation between ADAR1 expression and stromal scores in KIRC, whereas a negative correlation was observed in LIHC. Cell type analysis highlighted distinct relationships between ADAR1 expression and the two stromal cell types, blood endothelial cells (BECs) and lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs), and further determined the signature gene claudin-5 (CLDN5), in KIRC and LIHC. Moreover, ADAR1 was inversely related with CLDN5 in KIRC (n = 26) and LIHC (n = 30) samples, verified via IHC.

CONCLUSIONS

ADAR1 plays contrasting roles in LIHC and KIRC, associated with the enrichment of BECs and LECs within tumors. This study sheds light on the significant roles of stromal cells within the complex tumor microenvironment (TME) and provides new insights for future research in tumor immunotherapy and precision medicine.

Structural impacts of two disease-linked ADAR1 mutants: a molecular dynamics study

Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) are pivotal RNA-editing enzymes responsible for converting adenosine to inosine within double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). Dysregulation of ADAR1 editing activity, often arising from genetic mutations, has been linked to elevated interferon levels and the onset of autoinflammatory diseases. However, understanding the molecular underpinnings of this dysregulation is impeded by the lack of an experimentally determined structure for the ADAR1 deaminase domain. In this computational study, we utilized homology modeling and the AlphaFold2 to construct structural models of the ADAR1 deaminase domain in wild-type and two pathogenic variants, R892H and Y1112F, to decipher the structural impact on the reduced deaminase activity. Our findings illuminate the critical role of structural complementarity between the ADAR1 deaminase domain and dsRNA in enzyme-substrate recognition. That is, the relative position of E1008 and K1120 must be maintained so that they can insert into the minor and major grooves of the substrate dsRNA, respectively, facilitating the flipping-out of adenosine to be accommodated within a cavity surrounding E912. Both amino acid replacements studied, R892H at the orthosteric site and Y1112F at the allosteric site, alter K1120 position and ultimately hinder substrate RNA binding.

Multifaceted roles of RNA editing enzyme ADAR1 in innate immunity

Innate immunity must be tightly regulated to enable sensitive pathogen detection while averting autoimmunity triggered by pathogen-like host molecules. A hallmark of viral infection, double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) are also abundantly encoded in mammalian genomes, necessitating surveillance mechanisms to distinguish "self" from "nonself." ADAR1, an RNA editing enzyme, has emerged as an essential safeguard against dsRNA-induced autoimmunity. By converting adenosines to inosines (A-to-I) in long dsRNAs, ADAR1 covalently marks endogenous dsRNAs, thereby blocking the activation of the cytoplasmic dsRNA sensor MDA5. Moreover, beyond its editing function, ADAR1 binding to dsRNA impedes the activation of innate immune sensors PKR and ZBP1. Recent landmark studies underscore the utility of silencing ADAR1 for cancer immunotherapy, by exploiting the ADAR1-dependence developed by certain tumors to unleash an antitumor immune response. In this perspective, we summarize the genetic and mechanistic evidence for ADAR1's multipronged role in suppressing dsRNA-mediated autoimmunity and explore the evolving roles of ADAR1 as an immuno-oncology target.

Impact of Disease-Associated Mutations on the Deaminase Activity of ADAR1

The innate immune system relies on molecular sensors to detect distinctive molecular patterns, including viral double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), which triggers responses resulting in apoptosis and immune infiltration. Adenosine Deaminases Acting on RNA (ADARs) catalyze the deamination of adenosine (A) to inosine (I), serving as a mechanism to distinguish self from non-self RNA and prevent aberrant immune activation. Loss-of-function mutations in the ADAR1 gene are one cause of Aicardi Goutières Syndrome (AGS), a severe autoimmune disorder in children. Although seven out of the eight AGS-associated mutations in ADAR1 occur within the catalytic domain of the ADAR1 protein, their specific effects on the catalysis of adenosine deamination remain poorly understood. In this study, we carried out a biochemical investigation of four AGS-causing mutations (G1007R, R892H, K999N, and Y1112F) in ADAR1 p110 and truncated variants. These studies included adenosine deamination rate measurements with two different RNA substrates derived from human transcripts known to be edited by ADAR1 p110 (glioma-associated oncogene homologue 1 (hGli1), 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2C (5-HT2cR)). Our results indicate that AGS-associated mutations at two amino acid positions directly involved in stabilizing the base-flipped conformation of the ADAR-RNA complex (G1007R and R892H) had the most detrimental impact on catalysis. The K999N mutation, positioned near the RNA binding interface, altered catalysis contextually. Finally, the Y1112F mutation had small effects in each of the assays described here. These findings shed light on the differential effects of disease-associated mutations on adenosine deamination by ADAR1, thereby advancing our structural and functional understanding of ADAR1-mediated RNA editing.

RNA Methyltransferase FTSJ3 Regulates the Type I Interferon Pathway to Promote Hepatocellular Carcinoma Immune Evasion

Immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint blockade have achieved remarkable success in treating cancer. Unfortunately, response rates have been limited in multiple cancers including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The critical function of epigenetics in tumor immune evasion and antitumor immunity supports harnessing epigenetic regulators as a potential strategy to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. Here, we discovered a tumor-promoting function of FTSJ3, an RNA 2'-O-methyltransferase, in HCC by suppressing antitumor immune responses. FTSJ3 was upregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma, and high FTSJ3 expression correlated with reduced patient survival. Deletion of FTSJ3 blocked HCC growth and induced robust antitumor immune responses. Mechanistically, FTSJ3 suppressed double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-induced IFNβ signaling in a 2'-O-methyltransferase manner. Deletion of RNA sensors in HCC cells or systemic knockout of type I IFN receptor IFNAR in mice rescued the in vivo tumor growth defect caused by FTSJ3 deficiency, indicating that FTSJ3 deletion suppresses tumor growth by activating the RNA sensor-mediated type I IFN pathway. Furthermore, FTSJ3 deletion significantly enhanced the efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint blockade. The combination of FTSJ3 deficiency and anti-PD-1 antibody treatment effectively eradicated tumors and increased the survival time. In conclusion, this study reveals an epigenetic mechanism of tumor immune evasion and, importantly, suggests FTSJ3-targeting therapies as potential approach to overcome immunotherapy resistance in patients with HCC.

SIGNIFICANCE

Hepatocellular carcinoma cells use 2'-O-methylation catalyzed by FTSJ3 for immune evasion by suppressing abnormal dsRNA-mediated type I IFN responses, providing a potential target to activate antitumor immunity and enhance immunotherapy efficacy.

A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Effects of RNA-Editing Proteins ADAR and ADARB1 on the Expression of the Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes in HepaRG Cells

Two RNA-editing proteins, the adenosine deaminase acting on RNA, ADAR, and ADARB1, broadly regulate gene expression in editing-dependent and editing-independent manners. Previous studies showed that the expression of the drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450s (P450s) and UDP glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) changes upon knockdown (KD) of ADAR or ADARB1 in different hepatic cell lines. To systematically survey the effects of these two ADARs on the expression of P450s and UGTs, we used small interfering RNA in HepaRG cells and tested the association between the expression of the P450s and ADARs in a liver sample cohort (n = 246). KD of ADAR increased the expression of the CYP3As and CYP2C9 and reduced the expression of the others, whereas KD of ADARB1 reduced the expression of nearly all genes tested. ADAR KD also suppressed the induction of most P450s, whereas ADARB1 KD had mixed effects depending on the inducer/gene combination. P450 expression was positively associated with both ADARs in liver samples, consistent with the KD results. However, after adjusting for the expression of transcription factors (TFs) known to regulate P450 expression, the associations disappeared, indicating that the effects of ADAR or ADARB1 primarily occur through TFs. Moreover, we found that the expression of normally spliced CYP3A5 transcripts is increased in both KDs, indicating a direct effect of the ADARs on promoting the usage of the cryptic splice site generated by CYP3A5*3. Taken together, our results revealed the nonoverlapping regulatory effects of ADAR and ADARB1 and supported their broad roles in controlling the expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes in the liver. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Here, this study systematically surveyed the roles of ADAR and ADARB1 in both basal and induced expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes and assessed their coexpression in liver samples. This study's results support that ADAR and ADARB1 regulate the expression of the drug-metabolizing enzymes in the liver, suggesting that factors affecting ADAR expression also have the potential to impact drug metabolism.

Euthymic and depressed bipolar patients are characterized by different RNA editing patterns in blood

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a worldwide leading cause of disability. Inflammation roles in this disease is well established. ADAR1-mediated RNA editing is one of the key mechanisms regulating the inflammatory response. We have identified a panel of RNA editing-based blood biomarkers which allowed to discriminate unipolar from BD depression with high accuracy. We confirmed here the diagnostic value of this panel in a new cohort of BD patients recruited in Brazil. We also identified new combinations which allow a clear discrimination of BD from healthy controls and among BD subgroups, confirming that RNA editing is a key mechanism in BD.

A-to-I RNA editing by ADAR and its therapeutic applications: From viral infections to cancer immunotherapy

ADAR deaminases catalyze adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing on double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) substrates that regulate an umbrella of biological processes. One of the two catalytically active ADAR enzymes, ADAR1, plays a major role in innate immune responses by suppression of RNA sensing pathways which are orchestrated through the ADAR1-dsRNA-MDA5 axis. Unedited immunogenic dsRNA substrates are potent ligands for the cellular sensor MDA5. Upon activation, MDA5 leads to the induction of interferons and expression of hundreds of interferon-stimulated genes with potent antiviral activity. In this way, ADAR1 acts as a gatekeeper of the RNA sensing pathway by striking a fine balance between innate antiviral responses and prevention of autoimmunity. Reduced editing of immunogenic dsRNA by ADAR1 is strongly linked to the development of common autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. In viral infections, ADAR1 exhibits both antiviral and proviral effects. This is modulated by both editing-dependent and editing-independent functions, such as PKR antagonism. Several A-to-I RNA editing events have been identified in viruses, including in the insidious viral pathogen, SARS-CoV-2 which regulates viral fitness and infectivity, and could play a role in shaping viral evolution. Furthermore, ADAR1 is an attractive target for immuno-oncology therapy. Overexpression of ADAR1 and increased dsRNA editing have been observed in several human cancers. Silencing ADAR1, especially in cancers that are refractory to immune checkpoint inhibitors, is a promising therapeutic strategy for cancer immunotherapy in conjunction with epigenetic therapy. The mechanistic understanding of dsRNA editing by ADAR1 and dsRNA sensing by MDA5 and PKR holds great potential for therapeutic applications. This article is categorized under: RNA Processing > RNA Editing and Modification RNA in Disease and Development > RNA in Disease.

Expanding individualized therapeutic options via genoproteomics

Clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS)² tests have enabled treatment recommendations for cancer patients with driver gene mutations. Targeted therapy options for patients without driver gene mutations are currently unavailable. Herein, we performed NGS and proteomics tests on 169 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE)³ samples of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC, 65),⁴ colorectal cancers (CRC, 61),⁵ thyroid carcinomas (THCA, 14),⁶ gastric cancers (GC, 2),⁷ gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST, 11),⁸ and malignant melanomas (MM, 6).⁹ Of the 169 samples, NGS detected 14 actionable mutated genes in 73 samples, providing treatment options for 43% of the patients. Proteomics identified 61 actionable clinical drug targets approved by the FDA or undergoing clinical trials in 122 samples, providing treatment options for 72% of the patients. In vivo experiments demonstrated that the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MEK)¹⁰ inhibitor induced the overexpression of MEK1 (Map2k1) to block lung tumor growth in mice. Therefore, protein overexpression is a potentially feasible indicator for guiding targeted therapies. Collectively, our analysis suggests that combining NGS and proteomics (genoproteomics) could expand the targeted treatment options to 85% of cancer patients.

RNA Helicase DDX6 Regulates A-to-I Editing and Neuronal Differentiation in Human Cells

The DEAD-box proteins, one family of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), participate in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression with multiple aspects. Among them, DDX6 is an essential component of the cytoplasmic RNA processing body (P-body) and is involved in translational repression, miRNA-meditated gene silencing, and RNA decay. In addition to the cytoplasmic function, DDX6 is also present in the nucleus, but the nuclear function remains unknown. To decipher the potential role of DDX6 in the nucleus, we performed mass spectrometry analysis of immunoprecipitated DDX6 from a HeLa nuclear extract. We found that adenosine deaminases that act on RNA 1 (ADAR1) interact with DDX6 in the nucleus. Utilizing our newly developed dual-fluorescence reporter assay, we elucidated the DDX6 function as negative regulators in cellular ADAR1p110 and ADAR2. In addition, depletion of DDX6 and ADARs results in the opposite effect on facilitation of RA-induced differentiation of neuronal lineage cells. Our data suggest the impact of DDX6 in regulation of the cellular RNA editing level, thus contributing to differentiation in the neuronal cell model.

Ablation of Adar1 in myeloid cells imprints a global antiviral state in the lung and heightens early immunity against SARS-CoV-2

Under normal homeostatic conditions, self-double-stranded RNA (self-dsRNA) is modified by adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) to prevent the induction of a type I interferon-mediated inflammatory cascade. Antigen-presenting cells (APCs) sense pathogen-associated molecular patterns, such as dsRNA, to activate the immune response. The impact of ADAR1 on the function of APCs and the consequences to immunity are poorly understood. Here, we show that ADAR1 deletion in CD11c+ APCs leads to (1) a skewed myeloid cell compartment enriched in inflammatory cDC2-like cells, (2) enhanced numbers of activated tissue resident memory T cells in the lung, and (3) the imprinting of a broad antiviral transcriptional signature across both immune and non-immune cells. The resulting changes can be partially reversed by blocking IFNAR1 signaling and promote early resistance against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Our study provides insight into the consequences of self-dsRNA sensing in APCs on the immune system.

Global profiling of AMG510 modified proteins identified tumor suppressor KEAP1 as an off-target

KRAS inhibitor AMG510 covalently modifies the G12C residue and inactivates the KRAS/G12C function. Because there are many reactive cysteines in the proteome, it is important to characterize AMG510 on-target modification and off-targets. Here, we presented a streamlined workflow to measure abundant AMG510 modified peptides including that of KRAS/G12C by direct profiling, and a pan-AMG510 antibody peptide IP workflow to profile less abundant AMG510 off-targets. We identified over 300 off-target sites with three distinct kinetic patterns, expanding the AMG510 modified proteome involved in the nucleocytoplasmic transport, response to oxidative stress, adaptive immune system, and glycolysis. We found that AMG510 covalently modified cys339 of ALDOA and inhibited its enzyme activity. Moreover, AMG510 modified KEAP1 cys288 and induced NRF2 accumulation in the nuclear of NSCLC cells independent of KRAS/G12C mutation. Our study provides a comprehensive resource of protein off-targets of AMG510 and elucidates potential toxicological sideeffects for this covalent KRASG12C inhibitor.

ADAR1p150 Prevents MDA5 and PKR Activation via Distinct Mechanisms to Avert Fatal Autoinflammation

Effective immunity requires the innate immune system to distinguish foreign (non-self) nucleic acids from cellular (self) nucleic acids. Cellular double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) are edited by the RNA editing enzyme ADAR1 to prevent their dsRNA structure pattern being recognized as viral dsRNA by cytoplasmic dsRNA sensors including MDA5, PKR and ZBP1. A loss of ADAR1-mediated RNA editing of cellular dsRNA activates MDA5. However, additional RNA editing-independent functions of ADAR1 have been proposed, but a specific mechanism has not been delineated. We now demonstrate that the loss of ADAR1-mediated RNA editing specifically activates MDA5, while loss of the cytoplasmic ADAR1p150 isoform or its dsRNA binding activity enabled PKR activation. Deleting both MDA5 and PKR resulted in complete rescue of the embryonic lethality of Adar1p150 -/- mice to adulthood, contrasting with the limited or no rescue by removing MDA5, PKR or ZBP1 alone, demonstrating that this is a species conserved function of ADAR1p150. Our findings demonstrate that MDA5 and PKR are the primary in vivo effectors of fatal autoinflammation following the loss of ADAR1p150.

The Interplay between RNA Editing Regulator ADAR1 and Immune Environment in Colorectal Cancer

An abnormality in the regulation of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) enzymes, which catalyzed adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing, was closely associated with the highly aggressive biologic behavior and poor prognosis in many malignancies. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the relationship among transcript factors-microRNAs regulatory network, immune environment, and ADAR gene in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The association among the expression levels of ADAR mRNA and copy number variation, methylation, and mutation status were comprehensively analyzed using cBioPortal, Wanderer, and UALCAN databases in CRC datasets. ADAR-transcript factors (TFs) and ADAR-miRNA regulation networks were constructed by Cistrome Cancer and miRWalk2.0, respectively. The full network and subnetworks for ADAR coexpression genes were constructed using the STRING database and visualized by the MCODE module of the Cytoscape app. The relationship between ADAR mRNA expression and the abundance of infiltrating immune cells in CRC patients was explored by the Tumor Immune Estimation Resource, CIBERSORT, and single-gene gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). ADAR mRNA was elevated and was a cancer essential gene in CRC. ADAR mRNA and transcripts P110 were significantly elevated in CRC compared to normal controls. Low-level methylation in the promoter region and high copy number amplification of ADAR were responsible for high levels of ADAR mRNA expression. ADAR coexpression genes were mainly involved in immunoregulation, especially T-lymphocyte activation. Hub genes, including CD2, CD274, and FASLG, were also significantly upregulated in the ADAR-high group compared to the control group. Besides, M1 macrophages were enriched in the ADAR-high group compared to the control group. This study demonstrated that ADAR, a new essential gene, was involved in the immune regulator and was a novel immune treatment target in CRC.

NEIL1 Recoding due to RNA Editing Impacts Lesion-Specific Recognition and Excision

A-to-I RNA editing is widespread in human cells but is uncommon in the coding regions of proteins outside the nervous system. An unusual target for recoding by the adenosine deaminase ADAR1 is the pre-mRNA of the base excision DNA repair enzyme NEIL1 that results in the conversion of a lysine (K) to arginine (R) within the lesion recognition loop and alters substrate specificity. Differences in base removal by unedited (UE, K242) vs edited (Ed, R242) NEIL1 were evaluated using a series of oxidatively modified DNA bases to provide insight into the chemical and structural features of the lesion base that impact isoform-specific repair. We find that UE NEIL1 exhibits higher activity than Ed NEIL1 toward the removal of oxidized pyrimidines, such as thymine glycol, uracil glycol, 5-hydroxyuracil, and 5-hydroxymethyluracil. Gas-phase calculations indicate that the relative rates in excision track with the more stable lactim tautomer and the proton affinity of N3 of the base lesion. These trends support the contribution of tautomerization and N3 protonation in NEIL1 excision catalysis of these pyrimidine base lesions. Structurally similar but distinct substrate lesions, 5-hydroxycytosine and guanidinohydantoin, are more efficiently removed by the Ed NEIL1 isoform, consistent with the inherent differences in tautomerization, proton affinities, and lability. We also observed biphasic kinetic profiles and lack of complete base removal with specific combinations of the lesion and NEIL1 isoform, suggestive of multiple lesion binding modes. The complexity of NEIL1 isoform activity implies multiple roles for NEIL1 in safeguarding accurate repair and as an epigenetic regulator.

A Dual Role of DDX3X in dsRNA-Derived Innate Immune Signaling

DEAD-Box Helicase 3 X-Linked (DDX3X) is essential for RNA metabolism and participates in various cellular processes involving RNA. DDX3X has been implicated in cancer growth and metastasis. DDX3X is involved in antiviral responses for viral RNAs and contributes to pro- or anti-microbial responses. A better understanding of how human cells regulate innate immune response against the viral “non-self” double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) and endogenous viral-like “self” dsRNAs is critical to understanding innate immune sensing, anti-microbial immunity, inflammation, immune cell homeostasis, and developing novel therapeutics for infectious, immune-mediated diseases, and cancer. DDX3X has known for activating the viral dsRNA-sensing pathway and innate immunity. However, accumulating research reveals a more complex role of DDX3X in regulating dsRNA-mediated signaling in cells. Here, we discuss the role of DDX3X in viral dsRNA- or endogenous dsRNA-mediated immune signaling pathways.

IFN-I inducible miR-3614-5p targets ADAR1 isoforms and fine tunes innate immune activation

Regulation of innate immune responses is essential for maintenance of immune homeostasis and development of an appropriate immunity against microbial infection. We show here that miR-3614-5p, product of the TRIM25 host gene, is induced by type I interferon (IFN-I) in several human non-immune and immune cell types, in particular in primary myeloid cells. Studies in HeLa cells showed that miR-3614-5p represses both p110 and p150 ADAR1 and reduces constitutive and IFN-induced A-to-I RNA editing. In line with this, activation of innate sensors and expression of IFN-β and the pro-inflammatory IL-6 are promoted. MiR-3614-5p directly targets ADAR1 transcripts by binding to one specific site in the 3’UTR. Moreover, we could show that endogenous miR-3614-5p is associated with Ago2 and targets ADAR1 in IFN-stimulated cells. Overall, we propose that, by reducing ADAR1, IFN-I-induced miR-3614-5p contributes to lowering the activation threshold of innate sensors. Our findings provide new insights into the role of miR-3614-5p, placing it as a potential fine tuner of dsRNA metabolism, cell homeostasis and innate immunity.

The Epitranscriptome in miRNAs: Crosstalk, Detection, and Function in Cancer

The epitranscriptome encompasses all post-transcriptional modifications that occur on RNAs. These modifications can alter the function and regulation of their RNA targets, which, if dysregulated, result in various diseases and cancers. As with other RNAs, miRNAs are highly modified by epitranscriptomic modifications such as m6A methylation, 2'-O-methylation, m5C methylation, m7G methylation, polyuridine, and A-to-I editing. miRNAs are a class of small non-coding RNAs that regulates gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. miRNAs have gathered high clinical interest due to their role in disease, development, and cancer progression. Epitranscriptomic modifications alter the targeting, regulation, and biogenesis of miRNAs, increasing the complexity of miRNA regulation. In addition, emerging studies have revealed crosstalk between these modifications. In this review, we will summarize the epitranscriptomic modifications-focusing on those relevant to miRNAs-examine the recent crosstalk between these modifications, and give a perspective on how this crosstalk expands the complexity of miRNA biology.

Autoimmunity and Cancer-Two Sides of the Same Coin

Autoimmune disease results from the immune response against self-antigens, while cancer develops when the immune system does not respond to malignant cells. Thus, for years, autoimmunity and cancer have been considered as two separate fields of research that do not have a lot in common. However, the discovery of immune checkpoints and the development of anti-cancer drugs targeting PD-1 (programmed cell death receptor 1) and CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4) pathways proved that studying autoimmune diseases can be extremely helpful in the development of novel anti-cancer drugs. Therefore, autoimmunity and cancer seem to be just two sides of the same coin. In the current review, we broadly discuss how various regulatory cell populations, effector molecules, genetic predisposition, and environmental factors contribute to the loss of self-tolerance in autoimmunity or tolerance induction to cancer. With the current paper, we also aim to convince the readers that the pathways involved in cancer and autoimmune disease development consist of similar molecular players working in opposite directions. Therefore, a deep understanding of the two sides of immune tolerance is crucial for the proper designing of novel and selective immunotherapies.

Interplay between A-to-I Editing and Splicing of RNA: A Potential Point of Application for Cancer Therapy

Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing is a system of post-transcriptional modification widely distributed in metazoans which is catalyzed by ADAR enzymes and occurs mostly in double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) before splicing. This type of RNA editing changes the genetic code, as inosine generally pairs with cytosine in contrast to adenosine, and this expectably modulates RNA splicing. We review the interconnections between RNA editing and splicing in the context of human cancer. The editing of transcripts may have various effects on splicing, and resultant alternatively spliced isoforms may be either tumor-suppressive or oncogenic. Dysregulated RNA splicing in cancer often causes the release of excess amounts of dsRNA into cytosol, where specific dsRNA sensors provoke antiviral-like responses, including type I interferon signaling. These responses may arrest cell division, causing apoptosis and, externally, stimulate antitumor immunity. Thus, small-molecule spliceosome inhibitors have been shown to facilitate the antiviral-like signaling and are considered to be potential cancer therapies. In turn, a cytoplasmic isoform of ADAR can deaminate dsRNA in cytosol, thereby decreasing its levels and diminishing antitumor innate immunity. We propose that complete or partial inhibition of ADAR may enhance the proapoptotic and cytotoxic effects of splicing inhibitors and that it may be considered a promising addition to cancer therapies targeting RNA splicing.

RNA sensing via the RIG-I-like receptor LGP2 is essential for the induction of a type I IFN response in ADAR1 deficiency

RNA editing by the adenosine deaminase ADAR1 prevents innate immune responses to endogenous RNAs. In ADAR1-deficient cells, unedited self RNAs form base-paired structures that resemble viral RNAs and inadvertently activate the cytosolic RIG-I-like receptor (RLR) MDA5, leading to an antiviral type I interferon (IFN) response. Mutations in ADAR1 cause Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome (AGS), an autoinflammatory syndrome characterized by chronic type I IFN production. Conversely, ADAR1 loss and the consequent type I IFN production restricts tumor growth and potentiates the activity of some chemotherapeutics. Here, we show that another RIG-I-like receptor, LGP2, also has an essential role in the induction of a type I IFN response in ADAR1-deficient human cells. This requires the canonical function of LGP2 as an RNA sensor and facilitator of MDA5-dependent signaling. Furthermore, we show that the sensitivity of tumor cells to ADAR1 loss requires LGP2 expression. Finally, type I IFN induction in tumor cells depleted of ADAR1 and treated with some chemotherapeutics fully depends on LGP2 expression. These findings highlight a central role for LGP2 in self RNA sensing with important clinical implications.

The RNA editing enzyme ADAR modulated by the rs1127317 genetic variant diminishes EGFR-TKIs efficiency in advanced lung adenocarcinoma

AIMS

The adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing controlled by the editing genes are known to diversify transcripts in human. Aberrant A-to-I editing due to dysregulation of the editing genes are involved in cancer development. However, it is still largely unclear how single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the A-to-I editing genes confer to recurrence and/or drug resistance of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we systematically evaluated and validated the role of twenty-eight potential functional genetic variants in four A-to-I editing genes (ADAR, ADARB1, ADARB2 and AIMP2) in prognosis of NSCLC patients receiving EGFR-TKIs.

KEY FINDINGS

We identified the ADAR rs1127309, rs1127317, and rs2229857 SNPs markedly contributing to prognosis of patients treated with EGFR-TKIs. Interestingly, SNP rs1127317 locating in the ADAR 3'-untranslated region regulates gene expression in an allele-specific manner via modulating binding of miR-454-5p in cells. In support of this, patients with the rs1127317 C allele correlated with elevated ADAR expression in tumors showed profoundly shorten survival after EGFR-TKIs therapy compared to the A allele carriers. Silencing of ADAR notably enhanced gefitinib sensitivities of NSCLC cells.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings highlight the importance of the A-to-I RNA editing in drug resistance and nominate ADAR as a potential therapeutic target for unresectable NSCLC.

The role of RNA editing enzyme ADAR1 in human disease

Adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) catalyzes the posttranscriptional conversion of adenosine to inosine in double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), which can lead to the creation of missense mutations in coding sequences. Recent studies show that editing-dependent functions of ADAR1 protect dsRNA from dsRNA-sensing molecules and inhibit innate immunity and the interferon-mediated response. Deficiency in these ADAR1 functions underlie the pathogenesis of autoinflammatory diseases such as the type I interferonopathies Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome and dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria. ADAR1-mediated editing of endogenous coding and noncoding RNA as well as ADAR1 editing-independent interactions with DICER can also have oncogenic or tumor suppressive effects that affect tumor proliferation, invasion, and response to immunotherapy. The combination of proviral and antiviral roles played by ADAR1 in repressing the interferon response and editing viral RNAs alters viral morphogenesis and cell susceptibility to infection. This review analyzes the structure and function of ADAR1 with a focus on its position in human disease pathways and the mechanisms of its disease-associated effects. This article is categorized under: RNA in Disease and Development > RNA in Disease RNA Processing > RNA Editing and Modification RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Interactions: Functional Implications.

Therapeutic Interventions Targeting Innate Immune Receptors: A Balancing Act

The innate immune system is an organism's first line of defense against an onslaught of internal and external threats. The downstream adaptive immune system has been a popular target for therapeutic intervention, while there is a relative paucity of therapeutics targeting the innate immune system. However, the innate immune system plays a critical role in many human diseases, such as microbial infection, cancer, and autoimmunity, highlighting the need for ongoing therapeutic research. In this review, we discuss the major innate immune pathways and detail the molecular strategies underpinning successful therapeutics targeting each pathway as well as previous and ongoing efforts. We will also discuss any recent discoveries that could inform the development of novel therapeutic strategies. As our understanding of the innate immune system continues to develop, we envision that therapies harnessing the power of the innate immune system will become the mainstay of treatment for a wide variety of human diseases.

Are CRISPR Screens Providing the Next Generation of Therapeutic Targets?

CRISPR screens combined with molecular and genetic profiling of large panels of cell lines are helping to systematically identify cancer vulnerabilities. These large-scale screens, together with focused in vivo and isogenic cell line screens, have identified a growing number of promising targets and led directly to numerous target-specific drug discovery programs, several of which have reached clinical testing. However, systematic loss-of-function studies are still in their early stages. Genetic redundancy, the limitation of cell line models for many cancer types, and the difficulty of conducting complex in vitro and in vivo screens remain opportunities for discovery. We expect that over the next few years, efforts like the Cancer Dependency Map along with more focused screens will play a significant role in the creation of a roadmap of oncology therapeutic targets.

High-throughput screening to identify potential inhibitors of the Zα domain of the adenosine deaminase 1 (ADAR1)

Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) are enzymes involved in editing adenosine to inosine in the dsRNAs of cells associated with cancer development. The p150 isoform of ADAR1 is the only isoform containing the Zα domain that binds to both Z-DNA and Z-RNA. The Zα domain is suggested to modulate the immune response and could be a suitable target for antiviral treatment and cancer immunotherapy. In this study, we aimed to identify potential inhibitors for ADAR1 protein that bind the Zα domain using molecular docking and simulation tools. Virtual docking and molecular dynamics simulation approaches were used to screen the potential activity of 2115 FDA-approved compounds on the Zα domain of ADAR1 and filtered for to obtain the top-scoring hits. The top three compounds with the best XP Gscore—namely alendronate (−7.045), etidronate (−6.923), and zoledronate (−6.77)—were subjected to 50 ns simulations to characterize complex stability and identify the fundamental interactions that contribute to inhibition of the ADAR1 Zα domain. The three compounds were shown to interact with Lys169, Lys170, Asn173, and Tyr177 of the Zα domain-like helical backbone of Z-RNA. The study provides a comprehensive and novel insights of repurposes drugs for the inhibition of ADAR1 function.

How RNA modifications regulate the antiviral response

Induction of the antiviral innate immune response is highly regulated at the RNA level, particularly by RNA modifications. Recent discoveries have revealed how RNA modifications play key roles in cellular surveillance of nucleic acids and in controlling gene expression in response to viral infection. These modifications have emerged as being essential for a functional antiviral response and maintaining cellular homeostasis. In this review, we will highlight these and other discoveries that describe how the antiviral response is controlled by modifications to both viral and cellular RNA, focusing on how mRNA cap modifications, N6-methyladenosine, and RNA editing all contribute to coordinating an efficient response that properly controls viral infection.

RNA editing signatures identify melanoma patients who respond to Pembrolizumab or Nivolumab treatment

•

Global RNA editing levels or ADAR expression do not correlate with response to immunotherapy in melanoma patients.

•

RNA editing signatures within genes can segregate patients that will respond to immunotherapy across patient cohorts.

•

Recurrent RNA editing sites, those that are shared between melanoma patients, provide accurate prognostic predictions.

Immunotherapy has improved the prognosis for many melanoma patients; however, our capacity to predict patient responses and to understand the biological differences between patients who will or will not respond is limited. Gene expression profiling of tumors from patients who respond to immunotherapy has focused on deriving primarily immune-related signatures; however, these have shown limited predictive power. Recent studies have highlighted the role of RNA editing in modulating resistance to immunotherapy. To evaluate the utility of RNA editing activity as a discriminative tool in predicting immunotherapy response, we conducted a retrospective analysis of RNA-sequencing data from melanoma patients treated with Pembrolizumab or Nivolumab. Here, we developed RNA editing signatures that can identify patients who will respond to immunotherapy with very high accuracy and confidence. Our analysis demonstrates that RNA editing is a strong discriminative tool for examining sensitivity of melanoma patients to immunotherapy.

Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Melanoma Treatment: An Update

Over the past decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma and ensured significant improvement in overall survival versus chemotherapy. ICI or targeted therapy are now the first line treatment in advanced melanoma, depending on the tumor v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) mutational status. While these new approaches have changed the outcomes for many patients, a significant proportion of them still experience lack of response, known as primary resistance. Mechanisms of primary drug resistance are not fully elucidated. However, many alterations have been found in ICI-resistant melanomas and possibly contribute to that outcome. Furthermore, some tumors which initially responded to ICI treatment ultimately developed mechanisms of acquired resistance and subsequent tumor progression. In this review, we give an overview of tumor primary and acquired resistance mechanisms to ICI and discuss future perspectives with regards to new molecular targets and combinatorial therapies.

Targeting DDX3X Triggers Antitumor Immunity via a dsRNA-Mediated Tumor-Intrinsic Type I Interferon Response

Induction of nucleic acid sensing-mediated type I interferon (IFN) has emerged as a novel approach to activate the immune system against cancer. Here we show that the depletion of DEAD-box RNA helicase 3X (DDX3X) triggers a tumor-intrinsic type I IFN response in breast cancer cells. Depletion or inhibition of DDX3X activity led to aberrant cytoplasmic accumulation of cellular endogenous double-stranded RNAs (dsRNA), which triggered type I IFN production through the melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5)-mediated dsRNA-sensing pathway. Furthermore, DDX3X interacted with dsRNA-editing ADAR1 and dual depletion of DDX3X and ADAR1 synergistically activated the cytosolic dsRNA pathway in breast cancer cells. Loss of DDX3X in mouse mammary tumors enhanced antitumor activity by increasing the tumor-intrinsic type I IFN response, antigen presentation, and tumor infiltration of cytotoxic T and dendritic cells. These findings may lead to the development of a novel therapeutic approach for breast cancer by targeting DDX3X in combination with immune-checkpoint blockade. SIGNIFICANCE: This study elucidates the novel role of DDX3X in regulating endogenous cellular dsRNA homeostasis and type I IFN signaling in breast cancer. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/81/13/3607/F1.large.jpg.

Immunotherapeutic Potential of m6A-Modifiers and MicroRNAs in Controlling Acute Myeloid Leukaemia

Epigenetic alterations have contributed greatly to human carcinogenesis. Conventional epigenetic studies have been predominantly focused on DNA methylation, histone modifications, and chromatin remodelling. Epitranscriptomics is an emerging field that encompasses the study of RNA modifications that do not affect the RNA sequence but affect functionality via a series of RNA binding proteins called writer, reader and eraser. Several kinds of epi-RNA modifications are known, such as 6-methyladenosine (m6A), 5-methylcytidine (m5C), and 1-methyladenosine. M6A modification is the most studied and has large therapeutic implications. In this review, we have summarised the therapeutic potential of m6A-modifiers in controlling haematological disorders, especially acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). AML is a type of blood cancer affecting specific subsets of blood-forming hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs), which proliferate rapidly and acquire self-renewal capacities with impaired terminal cell-differentiation and apoptosis leading to abnormal accumulation of white blood cells, and thus, an alternative therapeutic approach is required urgently. Here, we have described how RNA m6A-modification machineries EEE (Editor/writer: Mettl3, Mettl14; Eraser/remover: FTO, ALKBH5, and Effector/reader: YTHDF-1/2) could be reformed into potential druggable candidates or as RNA-modifying drugs (RMD) to treat leukaemia. Moreover, we have shed light on the role of microRNAs and suppressors of cytokine signalling (SOCS/CISH) in increasing anti-tumour immunity towards leukaemia. We anticipate, our investigation will provide fundamental knowledge in nurturing the potential of RNA modifiers in discovering novel therapeutics or immunotherapeutic procedures.

Unbiased Identification of trans Regulators of ADAR and A-to-I RNA Editing

Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing is catalyzed by adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) enzymes that deaminate adenosine to inosine. Although many RNA editing sites are known, few trans regulators have been identified. We perform BioID followed by mass spectrometry to identify trans regulators of ADAR1 and ADAR2 in HeLa and M17 neuroblastoma cells. We identify known and novel ADAR-interacting proteins. Using ENCODE data, we validate and characterize a subset of the novel interactors as global or site-specific RNA editing regulators. Our set of novel trans regulators includes all four members of the DZF-domain-containing family of proteins: ILF3, ILF2, STRBP, and ZFR. We show that these proteins interact with each ADAR and modulate RNA editing levels. We find ILF3 is a broadly influential negative regulator of editing. This work demonstrates the broad roles that RNA binding proteins play in regulating editing levels, and establishes DZF-domain-containing proteins as a group of highly influential RNA editing regulators.

RNA Editing of the Human DNA Glycosylase NEIL1 Alters Its Removal of 5-Hydroxyuracil Lesions in DNA

Editing of the pre-mRNA of the DNA repair glycosylase NEIL1 results in substitution of a Lys with Arg in the lesion recognition loop of the enzyme. Unedited (UE, Lys242) NEIL1 removes thymine glycol lesions in DNA ∼30 times faster than edited (Ed, Arg242) NEIL1. Herein, we evaluated recognition and excision mediated by UE and Ed NEIL1 of 5-hydroxyuracil (5-OHU), a highly mutagenic lesion formed via oxidation of cytosine. Both NEIL1 isoforms catalyzed low levels of 5-OHU excision in single-stranded DNA, bubble and bulge DNA contexts and in duplex DNA base paired with A. Removal of 5-OHU in base pairs with G, T, and C was found to be faster and proceed to a higher overall extent with UE than with Ed NEIL1. In addition, the presence of mismatches adjacent to 5-OHU magnified the hampered activity of the Ed isoform. However, Ed NEIL1 was found to exhibit higher affinity for 5-OHU:G and 5-OHU:C duplexes than UE NEIL1. These results suggest that NEIL1 plays an important role in detecting and capturing 5-OHU lesions in inappropriate contexts, in a manner that does not lead to excision, to prevent mutations and strand breaks. Indeed, inefficient removal of 5-OHU by NEIL1 from 5-OHU:A base pairs formed during replication would thwart mutagenesis. Notably, nonproductive engagement of 5-OHU by Ed NEIL1 suggests the extent of 5-OHU repair will be reduced under cellular conditions, such as inflammation, that increase the extent of NEIL1 RNA editing. Tipping the balance between the two NEIL1 isoforms may be a significant factor leading to genome instability.

CircNEIL3 regulatory loop promotes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression via miRNA sponging and A-to-I RNA-editing

Background

A growing number of studies have focused on investigating circRNAs as crucial regulators in the progression of multiple cancer types. Nevertheless, the biological effects and underlying mechanisms of circRNAs in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain unclear.

Methods

Differentially expressed circRNAs between cancerous tissue and adjacent normal tissues were identified by RNA sequencing in PDAC. Subsequently, in vitro and in vivo functional experiments were performed to investigate the functional roles of circNEIL3 in PDAC tumour growth and metastasis. Furthermore, RNA pull-down, dual-luciferase reporter assays, RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assays, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and Sanger sequencing assays were performed to examine the circular interaction among circNEIL3, miR-432-5p and adenosine deaminases acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1).

Results

CircNEIL3 was upregulated in PDAC and promoted the progression of PDAC cells both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, circNEIL3 was shown to regulate the expression of ADAR1 by sponging miR-432-5p to induce RNA editing of glioma-associated oncogene 1 (GLI1), ultimately influencing cell cycle progression and promoting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in PDAC cells. Moreover, we discovered that the circNEIL3/miR-432-5p/ADAR1 axis was correlated with the PDAC clinical stage and overall survival of PDAC patients, while ADAR1 may reduce the biogenesis of circNEIL3.

Conclusions

Our findings reveal that circNEIL3 facilitates the proliferation and metastasis of PDAC through the circNEIL3/miR-432-5p/ADAR1/GLI1/cell cycle and EMT axis and that its expression is regulated by ADAR1 through a negative feedback loop. Therefore, circNEIL3 may serve as a prognostic marker and a therapeutic target for PDAC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12943-021-01333-7.

A-to-I RNA Editing in Cancer: From Evaluating the Editing Level to Exploring the Editing Effects

As an important regulatory mechanism at the posttranscriptional level in metazoans, adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR)-induced A-to-I RNA editing modification of double-stranded RNA has been widely detected and reported. Editing may lead to non-synonymous amino acid mutations, RNA secondary structure alterations, pre-mRNA processing changes, and microRNA-mRNA redirection, thereby affecting multiple cellular processes and functions. In recent years, researchers have successfully developed several bioinformatics software tools and pipelines to identify RNA editing sites. However, there are still no widely accepted editing site standards due to the variety of parallel optimization and RNA high-seq protocols and programs. It is also challenging to identify RNA editing by normal protocols in tumor samples due to the high DNA mutation rate. Numerous RNA editing sites have been reported to be located in non-coding regions and can affect the biosynthesis of ncRNAs, including miRNAs and circular RNAs. Predicting the function of RNA editing sites located in non-coding regions and ncRNAs is significantly difficult. In this review, we aim to provide a better understanding of bioinformatics strategies for human cancer A-to-I RNA editing identification and briefly discuss recent advances in related areas, such as the oncogenic and tumor suppressive effects of RNA editing.

The Role of RNA Editing in the Immune Response

The innate immune receptors in higher organisms have evolved to detect molecular signatures associated with pathogenic infection and trigger appropriate immune response. One common class of molecules utilized by the innate immune system for self vs. nonself discrimination is RNA, which is ironically present in all forms of life. To avoid self-RNA recognition, the innate immune sensors have evolved sophisticated discriminatory mechanisms that involve cellular RNA metabolic machineries. Posttranscriptional RNA modification and editing represent one such mechanism that allows cells to chemically tag the host RNAs as "self" and thus tolerate the abundant self-RNA molecules. In this chapter, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of the role of RNA editing/modification in the modulation of immune signaling pathways, and application of RNA editing/modification in RNA-based therapeutics and cancer immunotherapies.

High-throughput mutagenesis reveals unique structural features of human ADAR1

Adenosine Deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs) are enzymes that catalyze adenosine to inosine conversion in dsRNA, a common form of RNA editing. Mutations in the human ADAR1 gene are known to cause disease and recent studies have identified ADAR1 as a potential therapeutic target for a subset of cancers. However, efforts to define the mechanistic effects for disease associated ADAR1 mutations and the rational design of ADAR1 inhibitors are limited by a lack of structural information. Here, we describe the combination of high throughput mutagenesis screening studies, biochemical characterization and Rosetta-based structure modeling to identify unique features of ADAR1. Importantly, these studies reveal a previously unknown zinc-binding site on the surface of the ADAR1 deaminase domain which is important for ADAR1 editing activity. Furthermore, we present structural models that explain known properties of this enzyme and make predictions about the role of specific residues in a surface loop unique to ADAR1.

RNA editing contributes to epitranscriptome diversity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

RNA editing-primarily conversion of adenosine to inosine (A > I)-is a widespread posttranscriptional mechanism, mediated by Adenosine Deaminases acting on RNA (ADAR) enzymes to alter the RNA sequence of primary transcripts. Hence, in addition to somatic mutations and alternative RNA splicing, RNA editing can be a further source for recoding events. Although RNA editing has been detected in many solid cancers and normal tissue, RNA editing in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has not been addressed so far. We determined global RNA editing and recurrent, recoding RNA editing events from matched RNA-sequencing and whole exome sequencing data in CLL samples from 45 untreated patients. RNA editing was verified in a validation cohort of 98 CLL patients and revealed substantially altered RNA editing profiles in CLL compared with normal B cells. We further found that RNA editing patterns were prognostically relevant. Finally, we showed that ADAR knockout decreased steady state viability of MEC1 cells and made them more susceptible to treatment with fludarabine and ibrutinib in vitro. We propose that RNA editing contributes to the pathophysiology of CLL and targeting the RNA editing machinery could be a future strategy to maximize treatment efficacy.

ADAR1 Alleviates Inflammation in a Murine Sepsis Model via the ADAR1-miR-30a-SOCS3 Axis

Adenosine deaminase acting on double-stranded RNA 1 (ADAR1) mediates adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing events. ADAR1 is highly expressed in “septic” macrophages and in small intestinal tissues of mice with sepsis. Overexpression of ADAR1 suppresses inflammation and intestinal damage. However, the specific underlying mechanism is unclear. This study was conducted to explore how microRNA (miRNA) regulates the anti-inflammatory mechanism of macrophages following ADAR1 upregulation. A murine sepsis model was established by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Mice were randomly assigned to sham, CLP, and CLP+ADAR1 groups. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and fluorescence isothiocyanate-dextran were used to evaluate intestinal injury and permeability. Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), western blotting, and Luminex assays were performed to detect changes in the expression of inflammatory cytokines. Adenoviruses were used to express ADAR1 in RAW 264.7 cells. Ribonucleoprotein immunoprecipitation analysis was conducted to detect the binding of ADAR1 and miRNAs. A dual-luciferase reporter assay was used to detect the binding of miRNAs and regulatory factors. We observed that ADAR1 significantly increased the expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) in macrophages and reduced the expression of interleukin-6 in macrophages and the serum, thereby reducing intestinal permeability and mucosal injury in mice with sepsis. The RNA-ribonucleoprotein immunoprecipitation binding assay and qRT-PCR demonstrated a direct interaction between ADAR1 and pri-miR-30a. The luciferase assay demonstrated that SOCS3 was significantly inhibited by miR-30a-5p, the mature product of miR-30a. Thus, ADAR1 exerts a protective effect against sepsis by reducing inflammation and organ damage via the ADAR1-miR-30a-SOCS3 axis.

Regulation of Protein Kinase R by Epstein-Barr Virus EBER1 RNA

Protein kinase R (PKR) is a key antiviral component of the innate immune pathway and is activated by viral double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs). Adenovirus-associated RNA 1 (VAI) is an abundant, noncoding viral RNA that functions as a decoy by binding PKR but not inducing activation, thereby inhibiting the antiviral response. In VAI, coaxial stacking produces an extended helix that mediates high-affinity PKR binding but is too short to result in activation. Like adenovirus, Epstein-Barr virus produces high concentrations of a noncoding RNA, EBER1. Here, we compare interactions of PKR with VAI and EBER1 and present a structural model of EBER1. Both RNAs function as inhibitors of dsRNA-mediated PKR activation. However, EBER1 weakly activates PKR whereas VAI does not. PKR binds EBER1 more weakly than VAI. Assays at physiological ion concentrations indicate that both RNAs can accommodate two PKR monomers and induce PKR dimerization. A structural model of EBER1 was obtained using constraints derived from chemical structure probing and small-angle X-ray scattering experiments. The central stem of EBER1 coaxially stacks with stem loop 4 and stem loop 1 to form an extended RNA duplex of ∼32 bp that binds PKR and promotes activation. Our observations that EBER1 binds PKR much more weakly than VAI and exhibits weak PKR activation suggest that EBER1 is less well suited to function as an RNA decoy.

Cellular RNA surveillance in health and disease

The numerous quality control pathways that target defective ribonucleic acids (RNAs) for degradation play key roles in shaping mammalian transcriptomes and preventing disease. These pathways monitor most steps in the biogenesis of both noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) and protein-coding messenger RNAs (mRNAs), degrading ncRNAs that fail to form functional complexes with one or more proteins and eliminating mRNAs that encode abnormal, potentially toxic proteins. Mutations in components of diverse RNA surveillance pathways manifest as disease. Some mutations are characterized by increased interferon production, suggesting that a major role of these pathways is to prevent aberrant cellular RNAs from being recognized as "non-self." Other mutations are common in cancer, or result in developmental defects, revealing the importance of RNA surveillance to cell and organismal function.

ADAR1: "Editor-in-Chief" of Cytoplasmic Innate Immunity

Specialized receptors that recognize molecular patterns such as double stranded RNA duplexes-indicative of viral replication-are potent triggers of the innate immune system. Although their activation is beneficial during viral infection, RNA transcribed from endogenous mobile genetic elements may also act as ligands potentially causing autoimmunity. Recent advances indicate that the adenosine deaminase ADAR1 through RNA editing is involved in dampening the canonical antiviral RIG-I-like receptor-, PKR-, and OAS-RNAse L pathways to prevent autoimmunity. However, this inhibitory effect must be overcome during viral infections. In this review we discuss ADAR1's critical role in balancing immune activation and self-tolerance.