Structural mechanism of LIN28B nucleosome targeting by OCT4

Nucleosome fibre topology guides transcription factor binding to enhancers

Cellular identity requires the concerted action of multiple transcription factors (TFs) bound together to enhancers of cell-type-specific genes. Despite TFs recognizing specific DNA motifs within accessible chromatin, this information is insufficient to explain how TFs select enhancers1. Here we compared four different TF combinations that induce different cell states, analysing TF genome occupancy, chromatin accessibility, nucleosome positioning and 3D genome organization at the nucleosome resolution. We show that motif recognition on mononucleosomes can decipher only the individual binding of TFs. When bound together, TFs act cooperatively or competitively to target nucleosome arrays with defined 3D organization, displaying motifs in particular patterns. In one combination, motif directionality funnels TF combinatorial binding along chromatin loops, before infiltrating laterally to adjacent enhancers. In other combinations, TFs assemble on motif-dense and highly interconnected loop junctions, and subsequently translocate to nearby lineage-specific sites. We propose a guided-search model in which motif grammar on nucleosome fibres acts as signpost elements, directing TF combinatorial binding to enhancers.

Native nucleosome-positioning elements for the investigation of nucleosome repositioning

Nucleosome repositioning is essential for establishing nucleosome-depleted regions (NDRs) to initiate transcription. This process has been extensively studied using structural, biochemical, and single-molecule approaches, which require homogenously positioned nucleosomes. This is often achieved using the Widom 601 sequence, a highly efficient nucleosome positioning element (NPE) selected for its unusually strong binding to the H3-H4 histone tetramer. Due to the artificial nature of 601, native NPEs are needed to explore the role of DNA sequence in nucleosome repositioning. Here, we characterize the position distributions and nucleosome formation free energy for a set of yeast native nucleosomes (YNNs) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show these native NPEs can be used in biochemical studies of nucleosome repositioning by transcription factors (TFs) and the chromatin remodeler Chd1. TFs could directly reposition a fraction of nucleosomes containing native NPEs, but not 601-containing nucleosomes. In contrast, partial unwrapping was similar for 601 and native NPE sequences, and the rate of ATP-dependent remodeling by Chd1 was within the range of the fast and slow directions of the 601 nucleosomes. This set of native NPEs provides an alternative to the 601 NPE that can be used for probing the repositioning of nucleosomes that contain native DNA sequences.

Pioneer factors: Emerging rules of engagement for transcription factors on chromatinized DNA

Pioneering transcription factors (TFs) can drive cell fate changes by binding their DNA motifs in a repressive chromatin environment. Recent structures illustrate emerging rules for nucleosome engagement: TFs distort the nucleosomal DNA to gain access or employ alternative DNA-binding modes with smaller footprints, they preferentially access solvent-exposed motifs near the entry/exit sites, and frequently interact with histones. The extent of TF-histone interactions, in turn, depends on the motif location on the nucleosome, the type of DNA-binding fold, and adjacent domains present. TF-histone interactions can phase TF motifs relative to nucleosomes, and we discuss how these complex and surprisingly diverse interactions between nucleosomes and TFs contribute to function.

Structural insights into the cooperative nucleosome recognition and chromatin opening by FOXA1 and GATA4

Mouse FOXA1 and GATA4 are prototypes of pioneer factors, initiating liver cell development by binding to the N1 nucleosome in the enhancer of the ALB1 gene. Using cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM), we determined the structures of the free N1 nucleosome and its complexes with FOXA1 and GATA4, both individually and in combination. We found that the DNA-binding domains of FOXA1 and GATA4 mainly recognize the linker DNA and an internal site in the nucleosome, respectively, whereas their intrinsically disordered regions interact with the acidic patch on histone H2A-H2B. FOXA1 efficiently enhances GATA4 binding by repositioning the N1 nucleosome. In vivo DNA editing and bioinformatics analyses suggest that the co-binding mode of FOXA1 and GATA4 plays important roles in regulating genes involved in liver cell functions. Our results reveal the mechanism whereby FOXA1 and GATA4 cooperatively bind to the nucleosome through nucleosome repositioning, opening chromatin by bending linker DNA and obstructing nucleosome packing.

Systematic dissection of sequence features affecting binding specificity of a pioneer factor reveals binding synergy between FOXA1 and AP-1

Despite the unique ability of pioneer factors (PFs) to target nucleosomal sites in closed chromatin, they only bind a small fraction of their genomic motifs. The underlying mechanism of this selectivity is not well understood. Here, we design a high-throughput assay called chromatin immunoprecipitation with integrated synthetic oligonucleotides (ChIP-ISO) to systematically dissect sequence features affecting the binding specificity of a classic PF, FOXA1, in human A549 cells. Combining ChIP-ISO with in vitro and neural network analyses, we find that (1) FOXA1 binding is strongly affected by co-binding transcription factors (TFs) AP-1 and CEBPB; (2) FOXA1 and AP-1 show binding cooperativity in vitro; (3) FOXA1's binding is determined more by local sequences than chromatin context, including eu-/heterochromatin; and (4) AP-1 is partially responsible for differential binding of FOXA1 in different cell types. Our study presents a framework for elucidating genetic rules underlying PF binding specificity and reveals a mechanism for context-specific regulation of its binding.

Structural dynamics in chromatin unraveling by pioneer transcription factors

Pioneer transcription factors are proteins with a dual function. First, they regulate transcription by binding to nucleosome-free DNA regulatory elements. Second, they bind to DNA while wrapped around histone proteins in the chromatin and mediate chromatin opening. The molecular mechanisms that connect the two functions are yet to be discovered. In recent years, pioneer factors received increased attention mainly because of their crucial role in promoting cell fate transitions that could be used for regenerative therapies. For example, the three factors required to induce pluripotency in somatic cells, Oct4, Sox2, and Klf4 were classified as pioneer factors and studied extensively. With this increased attention, several structures of complexes between pioneer factors and chromatin structural units (nucleosomes) have been resolved experimentally. Furthermore, experimental and computational approaches have been designed to study two unresolved, key scientific questions: First, do pioneer factors induce directly local opening of nucleosomes and chromatin fibers upon binding? And second, how do the unstructured tails of the histones impact the structural dynamics involved in such conformational transitions? Here we review the current knowledge about transcription factor-induced nucleosome dynamics and the role of the histone tails in this process. We discuss what is needed to bridge the gap between the static views obtained from the experimental structures and the key structural dynamic events in chromatin opening. Finally, we propose that integrating nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with molecular dynamics simulations is a powerful approach to studying pioneer factor-mediated dynamics of nucleosomes and perhaps small chromatin fibers using native DNA sequences.

Pioneer factors: nature or nurture?

Chromatin is densely packed with nucleosomes, which limits the accessibility of many chromatin-associated proteins. Pioneer factors (PFs) are usually viewed as a special group of sequence-specific transcription factors (TFs) that can recognize nucleosome-embedded motifs, invade compact chromatin, and generate open chromatin regions. Through this process, PFs initiate a cascade of events that play key roles in gene regulation and cell differentiation. A current debate in the field is if PFs belong to a unique subset of TFs with intrinsic "pioneering activity", or if all TFs have the potential to function as PFs within certain cellular contexts. There are also different views regarding the key feature(s) that define pioneering activity. In this review, we present evidence from the literature related to these alternative views and discuss how to potentially reconcile them. It is possible that both intrinsic properties, like tight nucleosome binding and structural compatibility, and cellular conditions, like concentration and co-factor availability, are important for PF function.

Structure-based learning to predict and model protein-DNA interactions and transcription-factor co-operativity in cis-regulatory elements

Transcription factor (TF) binding is a key component of genomic regulation. There are numerous high-throughput experimental methods to characterize TF-DNA binding specificities. Their application, however, is both laborious and expensive, which makes profiling all TFs challenging. For instance, the binding preferences of ∼25% human TFs remain unknown; they neither have been determined experimentally nor inferred computationally. We introduce a structure-based learning approach to predict the binding preferences of TFs and the automated modelling of TF regulatory complexes. We show the advantage of using our approach over the classical nearest-neighbor prediction in the limits of remote homology. Starting from a TF sequence or structure, we predict binding preferences in the form of motifs that are then used to scan a DNA sequence for occurrences. The best matches are either profiled with a binding score or collected for their subsequent modeling into a higher-order regulatory complex with DNA. Co-operativity is modelled by: (i) the co-localization of TFs and (ii) the structural modeling of protein-protein interactions between TFs and with co-factors. We have applied our approach to automatically model the interferon-β enhanceosome and the pioneering complexes of OCT4, SOX2 (or SOX11) and KLF4 with a nucleosome, which are compared with the experimentally known structures.

Nucleosome-bound NR5A2 structure reveals pioneer factor mechanism by DNA minor groove anchor competition

Gene expression during natural and induced reprogramming is controlled by pioneer transcription factors that initiate transcription from closed chromatin. Nr5a2 is a key pioneer factor that regulates zygotic genome activation in totipotent embryos, pluripotency in embryonic stem cells and metabolism in adult tissues, but the mechanism of its pioneer activity remains poorly understood. Here, we present a cryo-electron microscopy structure of human NR5A2 bound to a nucleosome. The structure shows that the conserved carboxy-terminal extension (CTE) loop of the NR5A2 DNA-binding domain competes with a DNA minor groove anchor of the nucleosome and releases entry-exit site DNA. Mutational analysis showed that NR5A2 D159 of the CTE is dispensable for DNA binding but required for stable nucleosome association and persistent DNA 'unwrapping'. These findings suggest that NR5A2 belongs to an emerging class of pioneer factors that can use DNA minor groove anchor competition to destabilize nucleosomes and facilitate gene expression during reprogramming.

Pioneer factors: roles and their regulation in development

Pioneer factors are a subclass of transcription factors that can bind and initiate opening of silent chromatin regions. Pioneer factors subsequently regulate lineage-specific genes and enhancers and, thus, activate the zygotic genome after fertilization, guide cell fate transitions during development, and promote various forms of human cancers. As such, pioneer factors are useful in directed cell reprogramming. In this review, we define the structural and functional characteristics of pioneer factors, how they bind and initiate opening of closed chromatin regions, and the consequences for chromatin dynamics and gene expression during cell differentiation. We also discuss emerging mechanisms that modulate pioneer factors during development.

Real-Time Multistep Asymmetrical Disassembly of Nucleosomes and Chromatosomes Visualized by High-Speed Atomic Force Microscopy

During replication, expression, and repair of the eukaryotic genome, cellular machinery must access the DNA wrapped around histone proteins forming nucleosomes. These octameric protein·DNA complexes are modular, dynamic, and flexible and unwrap or disassemble either spontaneously or by the action of molecular motors. Thus, the mechanism of formation and regulation of subnucleosomal intermediates has gained attention genome-wide because it controls DNA accessibility. Here, we imaged nucleosomes and their more compacted structure with the linker histone H1 (chromatosomes) using high-speed atomic force microscopy to visualize simultaneously the changes in the DNA and the histone core during their disassembly when deposited on mica. Furthermore, we trained a neural network and developed an automatic algorithm to track molecular structural changes in real time. Our results show that nucleosome disassembly is a sequential process involving asymmetrical stepwise dimer ejection events. The presence of H1 restricts DNA unwrapping, significantly increases the nucleosomal lifetime, and affects the pathway in which heterodimer asymmetrical dissociation occurs. We observe that tetrasomes are resilient to disassembly and that the tetramer core (H3·H4)2 can diffuse along the nucleosome positioning sequence. Tetrasome mobility might be critical to the proper assembly of nucleosomes and can be relevant during nucleosomal transcription, as tetrasomes survive RNA polymerase passage. These findings are relevant to understanding nucleosome intrinsic dynamics and their modification by DNA-processing enzymes.

Systematic Dissection of Sequence Features Affecting the Binding Specificity of a Pioneer Factor Reveals Binding Synergy Between FOXA1 and AP-1

Despite the unique ability of pioneer transcription factors (PFs) to target nucleosomal sites in closed chromatin, they only bind a small fraction of their genomic motifs. The underlying mechanism of this selectivity is not well understood. Here, we design a high-throughput assay called ChIP-ISO to systematically dissect sequence features affecting the binding specificity of a classic PF, FOXA1. Combining ChIP-ISO with in vitro and neural network analyses, we find that 1) FOXA1 binding is strongly affected by co-binding TFs AP-1 and CEBPB, 2) FOXA1 and AP-1 show binding cooperativity in vitro, 3) FOXA1's binding is determined more by local sequences than chromatin context, including eu-/heterochromatin, and 4) AP-1 is partially responsible for differential binding of FOXA1 in different cell types. Our study presents a framework for elucidating genetic rules underlying PF binding specificity and reveals a mechanism for context-specific regulation of its binding.

The human LIN28B nucleosome is inherently pre-positioned for efficient binding of multiple OCT4s without H3 K27 acetylation

Pioneer transcription factors possess the unique ability to access DNA within tightly packed chromatin structures, playing pivotal roles in cell differentiation and reprogramming. However, their precise mechanism for recognizing nucleosomes has remained mystery. Recent structural and biochemical investigations into the binding interactions between the human pioneer factor OCT4 and the LIN28B nucleosome by Sinha et al.1 and Guan et al.2 have yielded conflicting results regarding nucleosome positioning, nucleosomal DNA unwrapping, binding cooperativity, and the role of N-terminal tail of OCT4. In this study, we undertook a comparative analysis of these two research efforts and delved into the factors contributing to the observed discrepancies. Our investigation unveiled that the utilization of human and Xenopus laevis core histones, along with a discrete two-step salt dialysis method, led to distinct positioning of DNA within reconstituted LIN28B nucleosomes. Additionally, our reanalysis of the electrophoretic mobility shift assay data showed that H3 K27 acetylation did not increase OCT4 binding to the internal sites of the nucleosome when normalized to input; instead, it promoted sample aggregation. Thus, the available experimental data support the notion that the human LIN28B nucleosome is pre-positioned for efficient binding with multiple OCT4s, and there is no compelling evidence for its regulation by histone modifications.