Evaluating the clinical utility of measuring levels of factor H and the related proteins

Factor H-related protein 1 in systemic lupus erythematosus

Background

Factor H (FH) is a major soluble inhibitor of the complement system and part of a family comprising five related proteins (FHRs 1-5). Deficiency of FHR1 was described to be linked to an elevated risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). As FHR1 can partially antagonize the functionality of FH, an altered FHR1/FH ratio could not only enhance SLE vulnerability but also affect the disease expression. This study focuses on the analysis of FH and FHR1 at a protein level, and the occurrence of anti-FH autoantibodies (anti-FH) in a large cohort of SLE patients to explore their association with disease activity and/or expression.

Methods

We assessed FH and FHR1 levels in plasma from 378 SLE patients compared to 84 healthy controls (normal human plasma, NHP), and sera from another cohort of 84 healthy individuals (normal human serum, NHS), using RayBio® CFH and CFHR1 ELISA kits. Patients were recruited by the Swiss SLE Cohort Study (SSCS). Unmeasurable FHR1 levels were all confirmed by Western blot, and in a subgroup of patients by PCR. Anti-FH were measured in SLE patients with non-detectable FHR1 levels and matched control patients using Abnova's CFH IgG ELISA kit.

Results

Overall, FH and FHR1 levels were significantly higher in healthy controls, but there was no significant difference in FHR1/FH ratios between SLE patients and NHPs. However, SLE patients showed a significantly higher prevalence of undetectable FHR1 compared to all healthy controls (35/378 SLE patients versus 6/168 healthy controls; p= 0.0214, OR=2.751, 95% CI = 1.115 - 8.164), with a consistent trend across all ethnic subgroups. Levels of FH and FHR1, FHR1/FH ratios and absence of FHR1 were not consistently associated with disease activity and/or specific disease manifestations, but absence of FHR1 (primarily equivalent to CFHR1 deficiency) was linked to the presence of anti-FH in SLE patients (p=0.039).

Conclusions

Deficiency of FHR1 is associated with a markedly elevated risk of developing SLE. A small proportion of FHR1-deficient SLE patients was found to have autoantibodies against FH but did not show clinical signs of microangiopathy.

Role of Complement Components in Asthma: A Systematic Review

Background: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease characterized by recurrent symptoms in response to a wide range of external stimuli, including allergens, viral infections, and air pollution together with internal host-derived danger signals. The disease is traditionally associated with adaptive immune responses; recent research emphasizes the critical role of innate immunity in its pathogenesis. The complement system, activated as part of the defense mechanisms, plays a crucial role in bridging innate to adaptive immunity. While experimental models demonstrate complement cascade activation in asthma, human studies remain limited. Methods: This systematic review summarizes existing literature on the complement system in asthma patients, gathering data from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The protocol was registered in the OSF. Results: Out of 482 initially identified articles, only 24 met the eligibility criteria, revealing disparities in sample origin, methodologies, and populations. Despite observed heterogeneity, a consistent result was found in the elevation of complement regulatory proteins, such as complement Factor H, in samples from patients with asthma compared to those from healthy subjects. Conclusions: The increased level of regulatory proteins, such as Factor H and I highlight that these may influence asthma pathophysiology. The role of complement factors as potential biomarkers of asthma activity and severity needs further evaluation.

The human factor H protein family - an update

Complement is an ancient and complex network of the immune system and, as such, it plays vital physiological roles, but it is also involved in numerous pathological processes. The proper regulation of the complement system is important to allow its sufficient and targeted activity without deleterious side-effects. Factor H is a major complement regulator, and together with its splice variant factor H-like protein 1 and the five human factor H-related (FHR) proteins, they have been linked to various diseases. The role of factor H in inhibiting complement activation is well studied, but the function of the FHRs is less characterized. Current evidence supports the main role of the FHRs as enhancers of complement activation and opsonization, i.e., counter-balancing the inhibitory effect of factor H. FHRs emerge as soluble pattern recognition molecules and positive regulators of the complement system. In addition, factor H and some of the FHR proteins were shown to modulate the activity of immune cells, a non-canonical function outside the complement cascade. Recent efforts have intensified to study factor H and the FHRs and develop new tools for the distinction, quantification and functional characterization of members of this protein family. Here, we provide an update and overview on the versatile roles of factor H family proteins, what we know about their biological functions in healthy conditions and in diseases.

Complement therapeutics are coming of age in rheumatology

The complement system was described over 100 years ago, and it is well established that activation of this pathway accompanies the great majority of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. In addition, over three decades of work in murine models of human disease have nearly universally demonstrated that complement activation is upstream of tissue injury and the engagement of pro-inflammatory mechanisms such as the elaboration of cytokines and chemokines, as well as myeloid cell recruitment and activation. With that background, and taking advantage of advances in the development of biologic and small-molecule therapeutics, the creation and clinical evaluation of complement therapeutics is now rapidly expanding. This article reviews the current state of the complement therapeutics field, with a focus on their use in diseases cared for or consulted upon by rheumatologists. Included is an overview of the activation mechanisms and components of the system, in addition to the mechanisms by which the complement system interacts with other immune system constituents. The various therapeutic approaches to modulating the system in rheumatic and autoimmune diseases are reviewed. To understand how best to clinically assess the complement system, methods of its evaluation are described. Finally, next-generation therapeutic and diagnostic advances that can be envisioned for the future are discussed.

Structural modelling of human complement FHR1 and two of its synthetic derivatives provides insight into their in-vivo functions

Human complement is the first line of defence against invading pathogens and is involved in tissue homeostasis. Complement-targeted therapies to treat several diseases caused by a dysregulated complement are highly desirable. Despite huge efforts invested in their development, only very few are currently available, and a deeper understanding of the numerous interactions and complement regulation mechanisms is indispensable. Two important complement regulators are human Factor H (FH) and Factor H-related protein 1 (FHR1). MFHR1 and MFHR13, two promising therapeutic candidates based on these regulators, combine the dimerization and C5-regulatory domains of FHR1 with the central C3-regulatory and cell surface-recognition domains of FH. Here, we used AlphaFold2 to model the structure of these two synthetic regulators. Moreover, we used AlphaFold-Multimer (AFM) to study possible interactions of C3 fragments and membrane attack complex (MAC) components C5, C7 and C9 in complex with FHR1, MFHR1, MFHR13 as well as the best-known MAC regulators vitronectin (Vn), clusterin and CD59, whose experimental structures remain undetermined. AFM successfully predicted the binding interfaces of FHR1 and the synthetic regulators with C3 fragments and suggested binding to C3. The models revealed structural differences in binding to these ligands through different interfaces. Additionally, AFM predictions of Vn, clusterin or CD59 with C7 or C9 agreed with previously published experimental results. Because the role of FHR1 as MAC regulator has been controversial, we analysed possible interactions with C5, C7 and C9. AFM predicted interactions of FHR1 with proteins of the terminal complement complex (TCC) as indicated by experimental observations, and located the interfaces in FHR1_1-2 and FHR1_4-5. According to AFM prediction, FHR1 might partially block the C3b binding site in C5, inhibiting C5 activation, and block C5b-7 complex formation and C9 polymerization, with similar mechanisms of action as clusterin and vitronectin. Here, we generate hypotheses and give the basis for the design of rational approaches to understand the molecular mechanism of MAC inhibition, which will facilitate the development of further complement therapeutics.