1
|
Rodrigues-Ferreira S, Nahmias C. Predictive biomarkers for personalized medicine in breast cancer. Cancer Lett 2022; 545:215828. [PMID: 35853538 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.215828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies among women worldwide. Based on clinical and molecular features of breast tumors, patients are treated with chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and/or radiotherapy and more recently with immunotherapy or targeted therapy. These different therapeutic options have markedly improved patient outcomes. However, further improvement is needed to fight against resistance to treatment. In the rapidly growing area of research for personalized medicine, predictive biomarkers - which predict patient response to therapy - are essential tools to select the patients who are most likely to benefit from the treatment, with the aim to give the right therapy to the right patient and avoid unnecessary overtreatment. The search for predictive biomarkers is an active field of research that includes genomic, proteomic and/or machine learning approaches. In this review, we describe current strategies and innovative tools to identify, evaluate and validate new biomarkers. We also summarize current predictive biomarkers in breast cancer and discuss companion biomarkers of targeted therapy in the context of precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvie Rodrigues-Ferreira
- Gustave Roussy Institute, INSERM U981, Prédicteurs moléculaires et nouvelles cibles en oncologie, Villejuif, France; LabEx LERMIT, Université Paris-Saclay, 92296 Châtenay-Malabry, France; Inovarion, 75005, Paris, France
| | - Clara Nahmias
- Gustave Roussy Institute, INSERM U981, Prédicteurs moléculaires et nouvelles cibles en oncologie, Villejuif, France; LabEx LERMIT, Université Paris-Saclay, 92296 Châtenay-Malabry, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cong L, Feng W, Yao Z, Zhou X, Xiao W. Deep Learning Model as a New Trend in Computer-aided Diagnosis of Tumor Pathology for Lung Cancer. J Cancer 2020; 11:3615-3622. [PMID: 32284758 PMCID: PMC7150458 DOI: 10.7150/jca.43268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer is one of the main causes of cancer-related death in the world. The identification and characteristics of malignant cells are essential for the diagnosis and treatment of primary or metastatic cancers. Deep learning is a new field of artificial intelligence, which can be used for computer aided diagnosis and scientific research of lung cancer pathology by analyzing and learning through establishment and simulation of human brain. In this review, we will introduce the application, progress and problems of deep learning in pathology of lung cancer and make prospects for its future development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Cong
- Department of Oncology, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Wanbing Feng
- Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Zhigang Yao
- Department of Pathology, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xiaoming Zhou
- Department of Scientific Research, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Wei Xiao
- Department of Scientific Research, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lawler M, Alsina D, Adams RA, Anderson AS, Brown G, Fearnhead NS, Fenwick SW, Halloran SP, Hochhauser D, Hull MA, Koelzer VH, McNair AGK, Monahan KJ, Näthke I, Norton C, Novelli MR, Steele RJC, Thomas AL, Wilde LM, Wilson RH, Tomlinson I. Critical research gaps and recommendations to inform research prioritisation for more effective prevention and improved outcomes in colorectal cancer. Gut 2018; 67:179-193. [PMID: 29233930 PMCID: PMC5754857 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2017] [Revised: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Colorectal cancer (CRC) leads to significant morbidity/mortality worldwide. Defining critical research gaps (RG), their prioritisation and resolution, could improve patient outcomes. DESIGN RG analysis was conducted by a multidisciplinary panel of patients, clinicians and researchers (n=71). Eight working groups (WG) were constituted: discovery science; risk; prevention; early diagnosis and screening; pathology; curative treatment; stage IV disease; and living with and beyond CRC. A series of discussions led to development of draft papers by each WG, which were evaluated by a 20-strong patient panel. A final list of RGs and research recommendations (RR) was endorsed by all participants. RESULTS Fifteen critical RGs are summarised below: RG1: Lack of realistic models that recapitulate tumour/tumour micro/macroenvironment; RG2: Insufficient evidence on precise contributions of genetic/environmental/lifestyle factors to CRC risk; RG3: Pressing need for prevention trials; RG4: Lack of integration of different prevention approaches; RG5: Lack of optimal strategies for CRC screening; RG6: Lack of effective triage systems for invasive investigations; RG7: Imprecise pathological assessment of CRC; RG8: Lack of qualified personnel in genomics, data sciences and digital pathology; RG9: Inadequate assessment/communication of risk, benefit and uncertainty of treatment choices; RG10: Need for novel technologies/interventions to improve curative outcomes; RG11: Lack of approaches that recognise molecular interplay between metastasising tumours and their microenvironment; RG12: Lack of reliable biomarkers to guide stage IV treatment; RG13: Need to increase understanding of health related quality of life (HRQOL) and promote residual symptom resolution; RG14: Lack of coordination of CRC research/funding; RG15: Lack of effective communication between relevant stakeholders. CONCLUSION Prioritising research activity and funding could have a significant impact on reducing CRC disease burden over the next 5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Lawler
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | | | - Annie S Anderson
- Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Gina Brown
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| | | | - Stephen W Fenwick
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Stephen P Halloran
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Daniel Hochhauser
- Department of Oncology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Mark A Hull
- Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Viktor H Koelzer
- Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Angus G K McNair
- Centre for Surgical Research, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Kevin J Monahan
- Family History of Bowel Cancer Clinic, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Inke Näthke
- School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Christine Norton
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Marco R Novelli
- Research Department of Pathology, University College London Medical School, London, UK
| | - Robert J C Steele
- Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Anne L Thomas
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Lisa M Wilde
- Bowel Cancer UK, London, UK
- Atticus Consultants Ltd, Croydon, UK
| | - Richard H Wilson
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Morphomolecular pathology: setting the framework for a new generation of pathologists. Br J Cancer 2017; 117:1581-1582. [PMID: 29123262 PMCID: PMC5729440 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
5
|
Moore DA, Young CA, Morris HT, Oien KA, Lee JL, Jones JL, Salto-Tellez M. Time for change: a new training programme for morpho-molecular pathologists? J Clin Pathol 2017; 71:285-290. [PMID: 29113995 PMCID: PMC5868526 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The evolution of cellular pathology as a specialty has always been driven by technological developments and the clinical relevance of incorporating novel investigations into diagnostic practice. In recent years, the molecular characterisation of cancer has become of crucial relevance in patient treatment both for predictive testing and subclassification of certain tumours. Much of this has become possible due to the availability of next-generation sequencing technologies and the whole-genome sequencing of tumours is now being rolled out into clinical practice in England via the 100 000 Genome Project. The effective integration of cellular pathology reporting and genomic characterisation is crucial to ensure the morphological and genomic data are interpreted in the relevant context, though despite this, in many UK centres molecular testing is entirely detached from cellular pathology departments. The CM-Path initiative recognises there is a genomics knowledge and skills gap within cellular pathology that needs to be bridged through an upskilling of the current workforce and a redesign of pathology training. Bridging this gap will allow the development of an integrated ‘morphomolecular pathology’ specialty, which can maintain the relevance of cellular pathology at the centre of cancer patient management and allow the pathology community to continue to be a major influence in cancer discovery as well as playing a driving role in the delivery of precision medicine approaches. Here, several alternative models of pathology training, designed to address this challenge, are presented and appraised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Moore
- Department of Cancer Studies, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Hayley T Morris
- Institute of Cancer Sciences - Pathology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Karin A Oien
- Institute of Cancer Sciences - Pathology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jessica L Lee
- Strategy and Initiatives, National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK
| | - J Louise Jones
- Centre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Manuel Salto-Tellez
- Northern Ireland Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li G, Bankhead P, Dunne PD, O’Reilly PG, James JA, Salto-Tellez M, Hamilton PW, McArt DG. Embracing an integromic approach to tissue biomarker research in cancer: Perspectives and lessons learned. Brief Bioinform 2017; 18:634-646. [PMID: 27255914 PMCID: PMC5862317 DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbw044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2016] [Revised: 04/08/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Modern approaches to biomedical research and diagnostics targeted towards precision medicine are generating 'big data' across a range of high-throughput experimental and analytical platforms. Integrative analysis of this rich clinical, pathological, molecular and imaging data represents one of the greatest bottlenecks in biomarker discovery research in cancer and other diseases. Following on from the publication of our successful framework for multimodal data amalgamation and integrative analysis, Pathology Integromics in Cancer (PICan), this article will explore the essential elements of assembling an integromics framework from a more detailed perspective. PICan, built around a relational database storing curated multimodal data, is the research tool sitting at the heart of our interdisciplinary efforts to streamline biomarker discovery and validation. While recognizing that every institution has a unique set of priorities and challenges, we will use our experiences with PICan as a case study and starting point, rationalizing the design choices we made within the context of our local infrastructure and specific needs, but also highlighting alternative approaches that may better suit other programmes of research and discovery. Along the way, we stress that integromics is not just a set of tools, but rather a cohesive paradigm for how modern bioinformatics can be enhanced. Successful implementation of an integromics framework is a collaborative team effort that is built with an eye to the future and greatly accelerates the processes of biomarker discovery, validation and translation into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerald Li
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Bankhead
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Philip D Dunne
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Paul G O’Reilly
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Jacqueline A James
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Manuel Salto-Tellez
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Peter W Hamilton
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Darragh G McArt
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Building a 'Repository of Science': The importance of integrating biobanks within molecular pathology programmes. Eur J Cancer 2016; 67:191-199. [PMID: 27677055 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2016] [Revised: 08/10/2016] [Accepted: 08/11/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Repositories containing high quality human biospecimens linked with robust and relevant clinical and pathological information are required for the discovery and validation of biomarkers for disease diagnosis, progression and response to treatment. Current molecular based discovery projects using either low or high throughput technologies rely heavily on ready access to such sample collections. It is imperative that modern biobanks align with molecular diagnostic pathology practices not only to provide the type of samples needed for discovery projects but also to ensure requirements for ongoing sample collections and the future needs of researchers are adequately addressed. Biobanks within comprehensive molecular pathology programmes are perfectly positioned to offer more than just tumour derived biospecimens; for example, they have the ability to facilitate researchers gaining access to sample metadata such as digitised scans of tissue samples annotated prior to macrodissection for molecular diagnostics or pseudoanonymised clinical outcome data or research results retrieved from other users utilising the same or overlapping cohorts of samples. Furthermore, biobanks can work with molecular diagnostic laboratories to develop standardised methodologies for the acquisition and storage of samples required for new approaches to research such as 'liquid biopsies' which will ultimately feed into the test validations required in large prospective clinical studies in order to implement liquid biopsy approaches for routine clinical practice. We draw on our experience in Northern Ireland to discuss how this harmonised approach of biobanks working synergistically with molecular pathology programmes is a key for the future success of precision medicine.
Collapse
|
8
|
Automated tumor analysis for molecular profiling in lung cancer. Oncotarget 2016; 6:27938-52. [PMID: 26317646 PMCID: PMC4695036 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2015] [Accepted: 07/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The discovery and clinical application of molecular biomarkers in solid tumors, increasingly relies on nucleic acid extraction from FFPE tissue sections and subsequent molecular profiling. This in turn requires the pathological review of haematoxylin & eosin (H&E) stained slides, to ensure sample quality, tumor DNA sufficiency by visually estimating the percentage tumor nuclei and tumor annotation for manual macrodissection. In this study on NSCLC, we demonstrate considerable variation in tumor nuclei percentage between pathologists, potentially undermining the precision of NSCLC molecular evaluation and emphasising the need for quantitative tumor evaluation. We subsequently describe the development and validation of a system called TissueMark for automated tumor annotation and percentage tumor nuclei measurement in NSCLC using computerized image analysis. Evaluation of 245 NSCLC slides showed precise automated tumor annotation of cases using Tissuemark, strong concordance with manually drawn boundaries and identical EGFR mutational status, following manual macrodissection from the image analysis generated tumor boundaries. Automated analysis of cell counts for % tumor measurements by Tissuemark showed reduced variability and significant correlation (p < 0.001) with benchmark tumor cell counts. This study demonstrates a robust image analysis technology that can facilitate the automated quantitative analysis of tissue samples for molecular profiling in discovery and diagnostics.
Collapse
|
9
|
Dunne PD, McArt DG, Bradley CA, O'Reilly PG, Barrett HL, Cummins R, O'Grady T, Arthur K, Loughrey MB, Allen WL, McDade SS, Waugh DJ, Hamilton PW, Longley DB, Kay EW, Johnston PG, Lawler M, Salto-Tellez M, Van Schaeybroeck S. Challenging the Cancer Molecular Stratification Dogma: Intratumoral Heterogeneity Undermines Consensus Molecular Subtypes and Potential Diagnostic Value in Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22:4095-104. [PMID: 27151745 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2016] [Accepted: 04/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A number of independent gene expression profiling studies have identified transcriptional subtypes in colorectal cancer with potential diagnostic utility, culminating in publication of a colorectal cancer Consensus Molecular Subtype classification. The worst prognostic subtype has been defined by genes associated with stem-like biology. Recently, it has been shown that the majority of genes associated with this poor prognostic group are stromal derived. We investigated the potential for tumor misclassification into multiple diagnostic subgroups based on tumoral region sampled. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We performed multiregion tissue RNA extraction/transcriptomic analysis using colorectal-specific arrays on invasive front, central tumor, and lymph node regions selected from tissue samples from 25 colorectal cancer patients. RESULTS We identified a consensus 30-gene list, which represents the intratumoral heterogeneity within a cohort of primary colorectal cancer tumors. Using a series of online datasets, we showed that this gene list displays prognostic potential HR = 2.914 (confidence interval 0.9286-9.162) in stage II/III colorectal cancer patients, but in addition, we demonstrated that these genes are stromal derived, challenging the assumption that poor prognosis tumors with stem-like biology have undergone a widespread epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Most importantly, we showed that patients can be simultaneously classified into multiple diagnostically relevant subgroups based purely on the tumoral region analyzed. CONCLUSIONS Gene expression profiles derived from the nonmalignant stromal region can influence assignment of colorectal cancer transcriptional subtypes, questioning the current molecular classification dogma and highlighting the need to consider pathology sampling region and degree of stromal infiltration when employing transcription-based classifiers to underpin clinical decision making in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 22(16); 4095-104. ©2016 AACRSee related commentary by Morris and Kopetz, p. 3989.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip D Dunne
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Darragh G McArt
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Conor A Bradley
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Paul G O'Reilly
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Helen L Barrett
- Department of Histopathology, Beaumont Hospital and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Robert Cummins
- Department of Histopathology, Beaumont Hospital and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tony O'Grady
- Department of Histopathology, Beaumont Hospital and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ken Arthur
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Maurice B Loughrey
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom. Department of Histopathology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Wendy L Allen
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Simon S McDade
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - David J Waugh
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Peter W Hamilton
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel B Longley
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Elaine W Kay
- Department of Histopathology, Beaumont Hospital and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Patrick G Johnston
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Lawler
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
| | - Manuel Salto-Tellez
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Sandra Van Schaeybroeck
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dunne PD, O'Reilly PG, Coleman HG, Gray RT, Longley DB, Johnston PG, Salto-Tellez M, Lawler M, McArt DG. Stratified analysis reveals chemokine-like factor (CKLF) as a potential prognostic marker in the MSI-immune consensus molecular subtype CMS1 of colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2016; 7:36632-36644. [PMID: 27153559 PMCID: PMC5095027 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2016] [Accepted: 04/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Subtyping Consortium (CRCSC) recently published four consensus molecular subtypes (CMS's) representing the underlying biology in CRC. The Microsatellite Instable (MSI) immune group, CMS1, has a favorable prognosis in early stage disease, but paradoxically has the worst prognosis following relapse, suggesting the presence of factors enabling neoplastic cells to circumvent this immune response. To identify the genes influencing subsequent poor prognosis in CMS1, we analyzed this subtype, centered on risk of relapse. In a cohort of early stage colon cancer (n=460), we examined, in silico, changes in gene expression within the CMS1 subtype and demonstrated for the first time the favorable prognostic value of chemokine-like factor (CKLF) gene expression in the adjuvant disease setting [HR=0.18, CI=0.04-0.89]. In addition, using transcription profiles originating from cell sorted CRC tumors, we delineated the source of CKLF transcription within the colorectal tumor microenvironment to the leukocyte component of these tumors. Further to this, we confirmed that CKLF gene expression is confined to distinct immune subsets in whole blood samples and primary cell lines, highlighting CKLF as a potential immune cell-derived factor promoting tumor immune-surveillance of nascent neoplastic cells, particularly in CMS1 tumors. Building on the recently reported CRCSC data, we provide compelling evidence that leukocyte-infiltrate derived CKLF expression is a candidate biomarker of favorable prognosis, specifically in MSI-immune stage II/III disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip D. Dunne
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Paul G. O'Reilly
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Helen G. Coleman
- Centre for Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Ronan T. Gray
- Centre for Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Daniel B. Longley
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Patrick G. Johnston
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Manuel Salto-Tellez
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Mark Lawler
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Darragh G. McArt
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
O'Reilly PG, Wen Q, Bankhead P, Dunne PD, McArt DG, McPherson S, Hamilton PW, Mills KI, Zhang SD. QUADrATiC: scalable gene expression connectivity mapping for repurposing FDA-approved therapeutics. BMC Bioinformatics 2016; 17:198. [PMID: 27143038 PMCID: PMC4855472 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-016-1062-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2016] [Accepted: 04/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gene expression connectivity mapping has proven to be a powerful and flexible tool for research. Its application has been shown in a broad range of research topics, most commonly as a means of identifying potential small molecule compounds, which may be further investigated as candidates for repurposing to treat diseases. The public release of voluminous data from the Library of Integrated Cellular Signatures (LINCS) programme further enhanced the utilities and potentials of gene expression connectivity mapping in biomedicine. Results We describe QUADrATiC (http://go.qub.ac.uk/QUADrATiC), a user-friendly tool for the exploration of gene expression connectivity on the subset of the LINCS data set corresponding to FDA-approved small molecule compounds. It enables the identification of compounds for repurposing therapeutic potentials. The software is designed to cope with the increased volume of data over existing tools, by taking advantage of multicore computing architectures to provide a scalable solution, which may be installed and operated on a range of computers, from laptops to servers. This scalability is provided by the use of the modern concurrent programming paradigm provided by the Akka framework. The QUADrATiC Graphical User Interface (GUI) has been developed using advanced Javascript frameworks, providing novel visualization capabilities for further analysis of connections. There is also a web services interface, allowing integration with other programs or scripts. Conclusions QUADrATiC has been shown to provide an improvement over existing connectivity map software, in terms of scope (based on the LINCS data set), applicability (using FDA-approved compounds), usability and speed. It offers potential to biological researchers to analyze transcriptional data and generate potential therapeutics for focussed study in the lab. QUADrATiC represents a step change in the process of investigating gene expression connectivity and provides more biologically-relevant results than previous alternative solutions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1062-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul G O'Reilly
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK
| | - Qing Wen
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK
| | - Peter Bankhead
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK
| | - Philip D Dunne
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK
| | - Darragh G McArt
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK
| | - Suzanne McPherson
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK
| | - Peter W Hamilton
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK
| | - Ken I Mills
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK.
| | - Shu-Dong Zhang
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK. .,Northern Ireland Centre for Stratified Medicine, University of Ulster, C-TRIC Building, Altnagelvin Hospital campus, Glenshane Road, Derry/Londonderry, BT47 6SB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lawler M, Gavin A, Salto‐Tellez M, Kennedy RD, Van Schaeybroeck S, Wilson RH, Harkin DP, Grayson M, Boyd RE, Hamilton PW, McArt DG, James J, Robson T, Ladner RD, Prise KM, O'Sullivan JM, Harrison T, Murray L, Johnston PG, Waugh DJ. Delivering a research-enabled multistakeholder partnership for enhanced patient care at a population level: The Northern Ireland Comprehensive Cancer Program. Cancer 2016; 122:664-73. [PMID: 26695702 PMCID: PMC4864440 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2015] [Revised: 10/28/2015] [Accepted: 11/04/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The last 20 years have seen significant advances in cancer care in Northern Ireland, leading to measureable improvements in patient outcomes. Crucial to this transformation has been an ethos that recognizes the primacy role of research in effecting heath care change. The authors' model of a cross‐sectoral partnership that unites patients, scientists, health care professionals, hospital trusts, bioindustry, and government agencies can be truly transformative, empowering tripartite clinical‐academic‐industry efforts that have already yielded significant benefit and will continue to inform strategy and its implementation going forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Lawler
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
| | - Anna Gavin
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public HealthQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
| | - Manuel Salto‐Tellez
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
- Northern Ireland Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
| | - Richard D. Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
- Almac DiagnosticsCraigavonUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Richard H. Wilson
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
- Northern Ireland Cancer CentreBelfastUnited Kingdom
| | - Denis Paul Harkin
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
- Almac DiagnosticsCraigavonUnited Kingdom
| | - Margaret Grayson
- Northern Ireland Cancer Research Consumer ForumBelfastUnited Kingdom
| | - Ruth E. Boyd
- Northern Ireland Cancer Research Consumer ForumBelfastUnited Kingdom
| | - Peter W. Hamilton
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
- PathXL, Innovation Centre, Northern Ireland Science ParkBelfastUnited Kingdom
| | - Darragh G. McArt
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
| | - Jacqueline James
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
- Northern Ireland Biobank, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
| | - Tracy Robson
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
- School of PharmacyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
| | - Robert D. Ladner
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
- CV6 Therapeutics, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
| | - Kevin M. Prise
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
| | - Joe M. O'Sullivan
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
- Northern Ireland Cancer CentreBelfastUnited Kingdom
| | - Timothy Harrison
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
- Almac DiscoveryCraigavonUnited Kingdom
| | - Liam Murray
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
| | - Patrick G. Johnston
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
| | - David J. Waugh
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
McArt DG, Blayney JK, Boyle DP, Irwin GW, Moran M, Hutchinson RA, Bankhead P, Kieran D, Wang Y, Dunne PD, Kennedy RD, Mullan PB, Harkin DP, Catherwood MA, James JA, Salto-Tellez M, Hamilton PW. PICan: An integromics framework for dynamic cancer biomarker discovery. Mol Oncol 2015; 9:1234-40. [PMID: 25814194 DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2014] [Revised: 12/23/2014] [Accepted: 02/05/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Modern cancer research on prognostic and predictive biomarkers demands the integration of established and emerging high-throughput technologies. However, these data are meaningless unless carefully integrated with patient clinical outcome and epidemiological information. Integrated datasets hold the key to discovering new biomarkers and therapeutic targets in cancer. We have developed a novel approach and set of methods for integrating and interrogating phenomic, genomic and clinical data sets to facilitate cancer biomarker discovery and patient stratification. Applied to a known paradigm, the biological and clinical relevance of TP53, PICan was able to recapitulate the known biomarker status and prognostic significance at a DNA, RNA and protein levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darragh G McArt
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Jaine K Blayney
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - David P Boyle
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth W Irwin
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Moran
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Ryan A Hutchinson
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Bankhead
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Declan Kieran
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Yinhai Wang
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Philip D Dunne
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Richard D Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Paul B Mullan
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - D Paul Harkin
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Mark A Catherwood
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Jacqueline A James
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Manuel Salto-Tellez
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
| | - Peter W Hamilton
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|