The accuracy of standard multiple sclerosis MRI brain sequences for the diagnosis of optic neuropathy

Comparison of a Whole-Brain Contrast-Enhanced 3D TSE T1WI versus Orbits Contrast-Enhanced 2D Coronal T1WI at 3T MRI for the Detection of Optic Nerve Enhancement in Patients with Acute Loss of Visual Acuity

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

MR imaging is the technique of choice for patients presenting with acute loss of visual acuity with no obvious ophthalmologic cause. The goal of our study was to compare orbits contrast-enhanced 2D coronal T1WI with a whole-brain contrast-enhanced 3D (WBCE-3D) TSE T1WI at 3T for the detection of optic nerve enhancement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This institutional review board-approved retrospective single-center study included patients presenting with acute loss of vision who underwent 3T MR imaging from November 2014 to February 2020. Two radiologists, blinded to all data, individually assessed the presence of enhancement of the optic nerve on orbits contrast-enhanced 2D T1WI and WBCE-3D T1WI separately and in random order. A McNemar test and a Cohen κ method were used for comparing the 2 MR imaging sequences.

RESULTS

One thousand twenty-three patients (638 women and 385 men; mean age, 42 [SD, 18.3] years) were included. There was a strong concordance between WBCE-3D T1WI and orbits contrast-enhanced 2D T1WI when detecting enhancement of the optic nerve: κ = 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.90). WBCE-3D T1WI was significantly more likely to detect canalicular enhancement compared with orbits contrast-enhanced 2D T1WI: 178/1023 (17.4%) versus 138/1023 (13.5%) (P < .001) and 108/1023 (10.6%) versus 90/1023 (8.8%) (P = .04), respectively. The WBCE-3D T1WI sequence detected 27/1023 (3%) instances of optic disc enhancement versus 0/1023 (0%) on orbits contrast-enhanced 2D T1WI. There were significantly fewer severe artifacts on WBCE-3D T1WI compared with orbits contrast-enhanced 2D T1WI: 68/1023 (6.6%) versus 101/1023 (9.8%) (P < .001). The median reader-reported confidence was significantly higher with coronal T1WI compared with 3D TSE T1WI: 5 (95% CI, 4-5) versus 3 (95% CI, 1-4; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that there was a strong concordance between WBCE-3D T1WI and orbits contrast-enhanced 2D T1WI when detecting enhancement of the optic nerve in patients with acute loss of visual acuity with no obvious ophthalmologic cause. WBCE-3D T1WI demonstrated higher sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing optic neuritis, particularly in cases involving the canalicular segments.

How far should I manage acute optic neuritis as an ophthalmologist? A United Kingdom perspective

Optic neuritis (ON) is an inflammation of or around the optic nerve, frequently caused by infectious or immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. In the UK, its strongest association is with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), though the combined prevalence of other associated infectious and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (I-IMID) is similar to that of MS-ON. Prompt identification and understanding of ON's underlying cause informs tailored management and prognosis. Several IMIDs linked to ON, such as aquaporin-4 antibody-associated optic neuritis (AQP4-ON), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated optic neuritis (MOG-ON), and neuro-sarcoidosis, show remarkable response to corticosteroid treatment. Therefore, urgent investigation and treatment are crucial in cases 'atypical' for MS-ON. Following the 1992 Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial, clinical practice has evolved, with short-course high-dose corticosteroids considered safe and effective for most people. Timely recognition of patients who could benefit is critical to avoid irreversible vision loss. This review provides a practical guide and a summary of evidence on the investigation and management of acute optic neuritis. It reflects the knowledge and limitations of current evidence, framed through the neuro-ophthalmic perspective of clinical practice at multiple UK academic centres.

Diagnosis and classification of optic neuritis

There is no consensus regarding the classification of optic neuritis, and precise diagnostic criteria are not available. This reality means that the diagnosis of disorders that have optic neuritis as the first manifestation can be challenging. Accurate diagnosis of optic neuritis at presentation can facilitate the timely treatment of individuals with multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease. Epidemiological data show that, cumulatively, optic neuritis is most frequently caused by many conditions other than multiple sclerosis. Worldwide, the cause and management of optic neuritis varies with geographical location, treatment availability, and ethnic background. We have developed diagnostic criteria for optic neuritis and a classification of optic neuritis subgroups. Our diagnostic criteria are based on clinical features that permit a diagnosis of possible optic neuritis; further paraclinical tests, utilising brain, orbital, and retinal imaging, together with antibody and other protein biomarker data, can lead to a diagnosis of definite optic neuritis. Paraclinical tests can also be applied retrospectively on stored samples and historical brain or retinal scans, which will be useful for future validation studies. Our criteria have the potential to reduce the risk of misdiagnosis, provide information on optic neuritis disease course that can guide future treatment trial design, and enable physicians to judge the likelihood of a need for long-term pharmacological management, which might differ according to optic neuritis subgroups.

Fractional anisotropy helps to differentiate the optic nerve impairment between neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the characteristics of optic nerve impairment between neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) patients by fractional anisotropy (FA).

METHODS

Thirty-one NMOSD patients, 25 MS patients, and 17 heathy controls (HC) who underwent optic nerve DTI were included. The optic nerves of the NMOSD and MS patients were divided into vision-impaired (VI) subgroups and normal-appearing (NA) subgroups according to visual status, respectively. FA values were measured in the anterior, middle, and posterior segments of each intraorbital optic nerve.

RESULTS

FA values in VI NMOSD were significantly decreased in the whole optic nerve, especially the posterior segment of the optic nerve (p < 0.001). FA values measured in the anterior and middle segments of the optic nerve in VI MS were significantly decreased as compared to those in the HC (p < 0.05). Between NMOSD and MS, FA values in the posterior segment of the optic nerve showed significant differences (VI NMOSD vs. VI MS, 0.458 ± 0.097 vs. 0.568 ± 0.098, p < 0.001; NA NMOSD vs. NA MS, 0.568 ± 0.098 vs. 0.600 ± 0.085, p = 0.041, respectively). The signal intensity ratio (SIR) in the posterior segment of the optic nerve was significantly increased in VI NMOSD as compared with VI MS (p = 0.002). The combination of SIR and FA for distinguishing VI NMOSD from VI MS resulted in sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 86.49%, 80.00%, 88.9%, and 76.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

FA could quantify the characteristics of NMOSD- and MS-related optic nerve impairment. DTI was a simple and effective imaging tool to differentiate between the two.

KEY POINTS

• NMOSD-related optic nerve impairment is extensive, often greater than half of the optic nerve, with the most significant involvement of the posterior segment of the optic nerve. • MS-related optic nerve impairment is more limited than NMOSD, and anterior and middle optic nerve involvement is common. • Optic nerve DTI is a convenient and effective imaging tool that can help characterize NMOSD and MS.

Mapping the rest of the human connectome: Atlasing the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system

The emergence of diffusion, structural, and functional neuroimaging methods has enabled major multi-site efforts to map the human connectome, which has heretofore been defined as containing all neural connections in the central nervous system (CNS). However, these efforts are not structured to examine the richness and complexity of the peripheral nervous system (PNS), which arguably forms the (neglected) rest of the connectome. Despite increasing interest in an atlas of the spinal cord (SC) and PNS which is simultaneously stereotactic, interactive, electronically dissectible, scalable, population-based and deformable, little attention has thus far been devoted to this task of critical importance. Nevertheless, the atlasing of these complete neural structures is essential for neurosurgical planning, neurological localization, and for mapping those components of the human connectome located outside of the CNS. Here we recommend a modification to the definition of the human connectome to include the SC and PNS, and argue for the creation of an inclusive atlas to complement current efforts to map the brain's human connectome, to enhance clinical education, and to assist progress in neuroscience research. In addition to providing a critical overview of existing neuroimaging techniques, image processing methodologies and algorithmic advances which can be combined for the creation of a full connectome atlas, we outline a blueprint for ultimately mapping the entire human nervous system and, thereby, for filling a critical gap in our scientific knowledge of neural connectivity.