Nordic walking for people with relapsing-remittent multiple sclerosis: A case series study

The effect of exercise and physical activity-interventions on step count and intensity level in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Reduced physical activity is a worldwide challenge in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify devise-measured effects of physical activity, exercise and physiotherapy-interventions on step count and intensity level of physical activity in individuals with MS.

Methods

A systematic search of the databases of PubMed (including Medline), Scopus, CINHAL and Web of Science was carried out to retrieve studies published in the English language from the inception to the first of May 2023. All trials concerning the effectiveness of different types of exercise on step count and intensity level in people with MS were included. The quality of the included studies and their risk of bias were critically appraised using The modified consolidated standards of reporting trials and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, respectively. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI of the step-count outcome and moderate to vigorous intensity level before versus after treatment were estimated in both Intervention and Control groups using the random effect model. The Harbord test were used to account for heterogeneity between studies and assess publication bias, respectively. Further sensitivity analysis helped with the verification of the reliability and stability of our review results.

Results

A total of 8 randomized clinical trials (involving 919 individuals with MS) were included. The participants (including 715 (77.8%) female and 204 (22.2%) male) had been randomly assigned to the Intervention (n = 493) or Control group (n = 426). The pooled mean (95% CI) age and BMI of participants were 49.4 years (95% CI: 47.4, 51.4 years) and 27.7 kg/m2 (95% CI: 26.4, 29 kg/m2), respectively. In terms of the comparison within the Intervention and the Control groups before and after the intervention, the results of the meta-analysis indicate that the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for step-count in the Intervention group was 0.56 (95% CI: -0.42, 1.54), while in the Control group it was 0.12 (95% CI: -0.05, 0.28). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the pooled SMD of step-count in the physical activity Intervention group compared to the Controls after the intervention (pooled standard mean difference = 0.19, 95% CI: -0.36,0.74). Subgroup analysis on moderate to vigorous intensity level of physical activity revealed no significant effect of the physical activity intervention in the Intervention group compared to the Control group after the intervention, or within groups before and after the intervention. Results of meta regression showed that age, BMI, duration of disease and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score were not the potential sources of heterogeneity (all p > 0.05). Data on the potential harms of the interventions were limited.

Conclusion

The results of this meta-analysis showed no significant differences in step count and moderate to vigorous physical activity level among individuals with MS, both within and between groups receiving physical activity interventions. More studies that objectively measure physical activity are needed.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022343621.

Effect of Nordic Walking Training on Walking Capacity and Quality of Life for People With Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Although there is emerging evidence that aerobic training improves walking capacity in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS), data are limited about the potential benefits of Nordic walking (NW) for this population. This study evaluates the effectiveness of outdoor NW training on walking capacity and related quality of life for people with MS compared with cycloergometer and treadmill aerobic training.

METHODS

A single-blinded (evaluator), randomized, 2-arm clinical trial was designed.

RESULTS

A total of 57 patients with MS (38 women and 19 men; mean ± SD age, 51.98 ± 9.93 years; mean ± SD disease duration, 14.75 ± 8.52 years) were included. Both therapeutic modalities improved walking distance as measured by the 6-Minute Walk Test after the training period. The NW group showed significant improvement on the physical and emotional subscales of the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 compared with the cycloergometer and treadmill group, which showed improvement only on the physical subscale.

CONCLUSIONS

Both training modalities proved to be of equal benefit in improving the walking capacity of people with MS, but outdoor NW training also seems to have a beneficial effect on the emotional component of health-related quality of life.

Effects of Nordic walking in people with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nordic walking (NW) may be a beneficial treatment for people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Since high-quality research has been published on the effects of NW on people with PD by now, an actualised and comprehensive, in-depth review is recommended to guide practitioners in prescribing this exercise modality. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of NW as a rehabilitation strategy for PD. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature search was performed using Pubmed, SportDiscus and Scopus up to May 2021. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) addressing the impact of a NW intervention on any outcomes in people with PD were included. The critical appraisal of the RCTs was retrieved from the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) or evaluated using the PEDro scale. The Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool was also employed. The review was not registered a priori on any database and a review protocol was not published. Twelve studies were included in the review. The investigations were mostly good-to-fair methodological quality, and risk of bias was acceptable. None of the reported statistically significant benefits of NW were clinically meaningful, except for walking ability. Although adherence to NW programs was good, some adverse effects derived from its practice were informed. The practice of Nordic Walking does not lead to clinically significant changes in global motor impairment, functional mobility, balance and physical fitness in patients with PD. This therapy seems to improve walking ability and quality of life, although further research in this latter outcome is needed.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical activity and associated technology use in persons with multiple sclerosis: an international RIMS-SIG Mobility survey study

Objective

To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical activity in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS).

Design

Multicenter international online survey study.

Setting

The survey was conducted within 11 participating countries. Each country launched the survey using online platforms from May to July 2021.

Participants

This was an electronic survey study targeting PwMS (N=3725).

Intervention

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

The survey ascertained physical activity performance and its intensity, the nature of the activities conducted, and the use of technology to support home-based physical activity before and during the pandemic.

Results

A total of 3725 respondents completed the survey. Prepandemic, the majority (83%) of respondents reported being physically active, and this decreased to 75% during the pandemic. This change was significant for moderate- and high-intensity activity (P<.0001). Activities carried out in physiotherapy centers, gyms, or pools decreased the most. Walking was the most frequently performed activity prepandemic (27%) and increased during the pandemic (33%). A total of 24% of those inactive during the pandemic had no intention of changing their physical activity behavior post pandemic. A total of 58% of the respondents did not use technology to support physical activity during the pandemic. Of those who did use technology, wearables were most used (24%). Of those currently nonactive (25%) expressed a preference for an in-person format to conduct physical activity post pandemic.

Conclusions

Physical activity performance, especially activities at moderate and high intensities, decreased during the pandemic in PwMS compared with prepandemic. Walking and using wearables gained popularity as ways to stay active. As we move toward an endemic COVID-19, a call for action to develop interventions focused on walking programs with specific emphasis on increasing physical activity of PwMS is proposed.