1
|
Rjeily NB, Solomon AJ. Misdiagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: Past, Present, and Future. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2024; 24:547-557. [PMID: 39243340 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-024-01371-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) is a prevalent worldwide problem. This review discusses how MS misdiagnosis has evolved over time and focuses on contemporary challenges and potential strategies for its prevention. RECENT FINDINGS Recent studies report cohorts with a range of misdiagnosis between 5 and 18%. Common disorders are frequently misdiagnosed as MS. Overreliance on MRI findings and misapplication of MS diagnostic criteria are often associated with misdiagnosis. Emerging imaging biomarkers, including the central vein sign and paramagnetic rim lesions, may aid diagnostic accuracy when evaluating patients for suspected MS. MS misdiagnosis can have harmful consequences for patients and healthcare systems. Further research is needed to better understand its causes. Concerted and novel educational efforts to ensure accurate and widespread implementation of MS diagnostic criteria remain an unmet need. The incorporation of diagnostic biomarkers highly specific for MS in the future may prevent misdiagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Bou Rjeily
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Andrew J Solomon
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect St., Burlington, VT, 05477, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Toljan K, Daboul L, Raza P, Martin ML, Cao Q, O'Donnell CM, Rodrigues P, Derbyshire J, Azevedo CJ, Bar-Or A, Caverzasi E, Calabresi PA, Cree BA, Freeman L, Henry RG, Longbrake EE, Oh J, Papinutto N, Pelletier D, Samudralwar RD, Schindler MK, Sotirchos ES, Sicotte NL, Solomon AJ, Shinohara RT, Reich DS, Sati P, Ontaneda D. Diagnostic performance of central vein sign versus oligoclonal bands for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2024; 30:1268-1277. [PMID: 39234802 PMCID: PMC11421977 DOI: 10.1177/13524585241271988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) oligoclonal bands (OCB) are a diagnostic biomarker in multiple sclerosis (MS). The central vein sign (CVS) is an imaging biomarker for MS that may improve diagnostic accuracy. OBJECTIVES The objective of the study is to examine the diagnostic performance of simplified CVS methods in comparison to OCB in participants with clinical or radiological suspicion for MS. METHODS Participants from the CentrAl Vein Sign in MS (CAVS-MS) pilot study with CSF testing were included. Select-3 and Select-6 (counting up to three or six CVS+ lesions per scan) were rated on post-gadolinium FLAIR* images. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value for Select-3, Select-6, OCB, and combinations thereof were calculated for MS diagnosis at baseline and at 12 months. RESULTS Of 53 participants, 25 were OCB+. At baseline, sensitivity for MS diagnosis was 0.75 for OCB, 0.83 for Select-3, and 0.71 for Select-6. Specificity for MS diagnosis was 0.76 for OCB, 0.48 for Select-3, and 0.86 for Select-6. At 12 months, PPV for MS diagnosis was 0.95 for Select-6 and 1.00 for Select-6 with OCB+ status. DISCUSSION Results suggest similar diagnostic performance of simplified CVS methods and OCB. Ongoing studies will refine whether CVS could be used in replacement or in conjunction with OCB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karlo Toljan
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lynn Daboul
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA/Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, MA, USA
| | - Praneeta Raza
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Melissa L Martin
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Quy Cao
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Carly M O'Donnell
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - John Derbyshire
- Functional MRI Facility, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christina J Azevedo
- Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amit Bar-Or
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Eduardo Caverzasi
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Peter A Calabresi
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Bruce Ac Cree
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Leorah Freeman
- Department of Neurology, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Roland G Henry
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Jiwon Oh
- Division of Neurology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nico Papinutto
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Pelletier
- Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Rohini D Samudralwar
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew K Schindler
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elias S Sotirchos
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nancy L Sicotte
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrew J Solomon
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel S Reich
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Pascal Sati
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Ontaneda
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rimkus CDM, Otsuka FS, Nunes DM, Chaim KT, Otaduy MCG. Central Vein Sign and Paramagnetic Rim Lesions: Susceptibility Changes in Brain Tissues and Their Implications for the Study of Multiple Sclerosis Pathology. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1362. [PMID: 39001252 PMCID: PMC11240827 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14131362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common acquired inflammatory and demyelinating disease in adults. The conventional diagnostic of MS and the follow-up of inflammatory activity is based on the detection of hyperintense foci in T2 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and lesions with brain-blood barrier (BBB) disruption in the central nervous system (CNS) parenchyma. However, T2/FLAIR hyperintense lesions are not specific to MS and the MS pathology and inflammatory processes go far beyond focal lesions and can be independent of BBB disruption. MRI techniques based on the magnetic susceptibility properties of the tissue, such as T2*, susceptibility-weighted images (SWI), and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) offer tools for advanced MS diagnostic, follow-up, and the assessment of more detailed features of MS dynamic pathology. Susceptibility-weighted techniques are sensitive to the paramagnetic components of biological tissues, such as deoxyhemoglobin. This capability enables the visualization of brain parenchymal veins. Consequently, it presents an opportunity to identify veins within the core of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions, thereby affirming their venocentric characteristics. This advancement significantly enhances the accuracy of the differential diagnostic process. Another important paramagnetic component in biological tissues is iron. In MS, the dynamic trafficking of iron between different cells, such as oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, and microglia, enables the study of different stages of demyelination and remyelination. Furthermore, the accumulation of iron in activated microglia serves as an indicator of latent inflammatory activity in chronic MS lesions, termed paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs). PRLs have been correlated with disease progression and degenerative processes, underscoring their significance in MS pathology. This review will elucidate the underlying physical principles of magnetic susceptibility and their implications for the formation and interpretation of T2*, SWI, and QSM sequences. Additionally, it will explore their applications in multiple sclerosis (MS), particularly in detecting the central vein sign (CVS) and PRLs, and assessing iron metabolism. Furthermore, the review will discuss their role in advancing early and precise MS diagnosis and prognostic evaluation, as well as their utility in studying chronic active inflammation and degenerative processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina de Medeiros Rimkus
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (HCFMUSP), Sao Paulo 05403-010, SP, Brazil
- Laboratory of Medical Investigation in Magnetic Resonance-44 (LIM 44), University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil
- MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Instituto D'Or de Ensino e Pesquisa (IDOR), Sao Paulo 01401-002, SP, Brazil
| | - Fábio Seiji Otsuka
- Laboratory of Medical Investigation in Magnetic Resonance-44 (LIM 44), University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil
| | - Douglas Mendes Nunes
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (HCFMUSP), Sao Paulo 05403-010, SP, Brazil
- Grupo Fleury, Sao Paulo 04701-200, SP, Brazil
| | - Khallil Taverna Chaim
- Laboratory of Medical Investigation in Magnetic Resonance-44 (LIM 44), University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil
| | - Maria Concepción Garcia Otaduy
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (HCFMUSP), Sao Paulo 05403-010, SP, Brazil
- Laboratory of Medical Investigation in Magnetic Resonance-44 (LIM 44), University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) misdiagnosis in the form of an incorrect diagnosis of MS, as well as delayed diagnosis in patients who do have MS, both influence patient clinical outcomes. Contemporary studies have reported data on factors associated with these diagnostic challenges and their frequency. Expediting diagnosis in patients with MS and reducing MS misdiagnosis in patients who do not have MS may be aided by educational efforts surrounding early MS symptoms and proper application of MS diagnostic criteria. Emerging novel MS diagnostic biomarkers may aid early and accurate diagnosis of MS in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marwa Kaisey
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 South San Vicente Boulevard, A6600, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| | - Andrew J Solomon
- Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont, Larner College of Medicine, University Health Center, Arnold 2, 1 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05401, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abou Mrad T, Naja K, Khoury SJ, Hannoun S. Central vein sign and paramagnetic rim sign: From radiologically isolated syndrome to multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 2023; 30:2912-2918. [PMID: 37350369 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
The widespread use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has led to an increase in incidental findings in the central nervous system. Radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) is a condition where imaging reveals lesions suggestive of demyelinating disease without any clinical episodes consistent with multiple sclerosis (MS). The prognosis for RIS patients is uncertain, with some remaining asymptomatic while others progress to MS. Several risk factors for disease progression have been identified, including male sex, younger age at diagnosis, and spinal cord lesions. This article reviews two promising biomarkers, the central vein sign (CVS) and the paramagnetic rim sign (PRS), and their potential role in the diagnosis and prognosis of MS and RIS. Both CVS and PRS have been shown to be accurate diagnostic markers in MS, with high sensitivity and specificity, and have been useful in distinguishing MS from other disorders. Further research is needed to validate these findings and determine the clinical utility of these biomarkers in routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatiana Abou Mrad
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Kim Naja
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Samia J Khoury
- Nehme and Therese Tohme Multiple Sclerosis Center, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Salem Hannoun
- Medical Imaging Sciences Program, Division of Health Professions, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kolb H, Al-Louzi O, Beck ES, Sati P, Absinta M, Reich DS. From pathology to MRI and back: Clinically relevant biomarkers of multiple sclerosis lesions. Neuroimage Clin 2022; 36:103194. [PMID: 36170753 PMCID: PMC9668624 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Focal lesions in both white and gray matter are characteristic of multiple sclerosis (MS). Histopathological studies have helped define the main underlying pathological processes involved in lesion formation and evolution, serving as a gold standard for many years. However, histopathology suffers from an intrinsic bias resulting from over-reliance on tissue samples from late stages of the disease or atypical cases and is inadequate for routine patient assessment. Pathological-radiological correlative studies have established advanced MRI's sensitivity to several relevant MS-pathological substrates and its practicality for assessing dynamic changes and following lesions over time. This review focuses on novel imaging techniques that serve as biomarkers of critical pathological substrates of MS lesions: the central vein, chronic inflammation, remyelination and repair, and cortical lesions. For each pathological process, we address the correlative value of MRI to MS pathology, its contribution in elucidating MS pathology in vivo, and the clinical utility of the imaging biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadar Kolb
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA,Department of Neurology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Israel,Corresponding author at: Department of Neurology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Israel.
| | - Omar Al-Louzi
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA,Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Erin S. Beck
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pascal Sati
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA,Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Martina Absinta
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA,Institute of Experimental Neurology (INSPE), IRCSS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy,Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel S. Reich
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Al-Louzi O, Manukyan S, Donadieu M, Absinta M, Letchuman V, Calabresi B, Desai P, Beck ES, Roy S, Ohayon J, Pham DL, Thomas A, Jacobson S, Cortese I, Auluck PK, Nair G, Sati P, Reich DS. Lesion size and shape in central vein sign assessment for multiple sclerosis diagnosis: An in vivo and postmortem MRI study. Mult Scler 2022; 28:1891-1902. [PMID: 35674284 DOI: 10.1177/13524585221097560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The "central vein sign" (CVS), a linear hypointensity on T2*-weighted imaging corresponding to a central vein/venule, is associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions. The effect of lesion-size exclusion criteria on MS diagnostic accuracy has not been extensively studied. OBJECTIVE Investigate the optimal lesion-size exclusion criteria for CVS use in MS diagnosis. METHODS Cross-sectional study of 163 MS and 51 non-MS, and radiological/histopathological correlation of 5 MS and 1 control autopsy cases. The effects of lesion-size exclusion on MS diagnosis using the CVS, and intralesional vein detection on histopathology were evaluated. RESULTS CVS+ lesions were larger compared to CVS- lesions, with effect modification by MS diagnosis (mean difference +7.7 mm3, p = 0.004). CVS percentage-based criteria with no lesion-size exclusion showed the highest diagnostic accuracy in differentiating MS cases. However, a simple count of three or more CVS+ lesions greater than 3.5 mm is highly accurate and can be rapidly implemented (sensitivity 93%; specificity 88%). On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-histopathological correlation, the CVS had high specificity for identifying intralesional veins (0/7 false positives). CONCLUSION Lesion-size measures add important information when using CVS+ lesion counts for MS diagnosis. The CVS is a specific biomarker corresponding to intralesional veins on histopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Al-Louzi
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sargis Manukyan
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Maxime Donadieu
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Martina Absinta
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; USA/IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Vijay Letchuman
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Brent Calabresi
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Parth Desai
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Erin S Beck
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Snehashis Roy
- Section on Neural Function, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Joan Ohayon
- Neuroimmunology Clinic, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Dzung L Pham
- Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Anish Thomas
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Steven Jacobson
- Viral Immunology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Irene Cortese
- Neuroimmunology Clinic, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Pavan K Auluck
- Human Brain Collection Core, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Govind Nair
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Pascal Sati
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel S Reich
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lashgari G, Solomon AJ, Kaisey M. Teaching Cases in Differential Diagnosis: Misdiagnosis of MS Perpetuated for 14 Years. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 64:103950. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize recent evidence from the application of susceptibility-based MRI sequences to investigate the 'central vein sign' (CVS) and 'iron rim' as biomarkers to improve the diagnostic work-up of multiple sclerosis (MS) and predict disease severity. RECENT FINDINGS The CVS is a specific biomarker for MS being detectable from the earliest phase of the disease. A threshold of 40% of lesions with the CVS can be optimal to distinguish MS from non-MS patients. Iron rim lesions, reflecting chronic active lesions, develop in relapsing-remitting MS patients and persist in progressive MS. They increase in size in the first few years after their formation and then stabilize. Iron rim lesions can distinguish MS from non-MS patients but not the different MS phenotypes. The presence of at least four iron rim lesions is associated with an earlier clinical disability, higher prevalence of clinically progressive MS and more severe brain atrophy. Automated methods for CVS and iron rim lesion detection are under development to facilitate their quantification. SUMMARY The assessment of the CVS and iron rim lesions is feasible in the clinical scenario and provides MRI measures specific to MS pathological substrates, improving diagnosis and prognosis of these patients.
Collapse
|