1
|
Ghiasian M, Farhadian M, Salehzadeh A. Evaluation of willingness to obtain of Covid 19 vaccine in patients with multiple sclerosis. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE 2024; 13:7-12. [PMID: 39021562 PMCID: PMC11250120 DOI: 10.62347/occz6431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Assessing vaccine willingness and understanding sources of vaccine hesitancy in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) helps healthcare providers approach patients more effectively while respecting their autonomy to encourage coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. MATERIALS AND METHODS A descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study using a researcher-made checklist was conducted on MS patients referred to Neshat Clinic of Hamadan during the years 2020-2021. The checklist contained questions about demographic information, MS phenotype, duration of illness, expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score, and COVID-19 vaccination status. The expanded disability status scale (EDSS) is the most commonly used instrument for measuring disability in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The EDSS scale ranges from 0 to 10 in increments of 0.5 units, denoting advanced points of disability. RESULTS Based on the results, 20 individuals (10%) were in the vaccine non-acceptance group, while 181 individuals (90%) were in the vaccine acceptance group. A significant number of relapsing and remitting (RR) type MS patients (90.7%) and all primary progressive (PP) type MS patients (100%) accepted the vaccine. In comparison, vaccine non-acceptance in the secondary progressive (SP) group was relatively higher (20.7%) compared to other types of MS, and this difference was significant (P < 0.05). Additionally, there was a statistically significant relationship between the history of COVID-19 and vaccine acceptance (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION The study results demonstrated a high rate of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among MS patients. MS phenotype, previous infection experiences, and other influences allow for COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among MS patients. This information can improve health programs and communication strategies for COVID-19 and future possible infectious disease vaccination in individuals with MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masoud Ghiasian
- Department of Neuroimmunology, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical SciencesHamadan, Iran
| | - Maryam Farhadian
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical SciencesHamadan, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stanikić M, Twomey E, Puhan MA, Kamm CP, Salmen A, Ajdacic-Gross V, Zecca C, Gobbi C, von Wyl V. Experiences of persons with multiple sclerosis with the Covid-19 vaccination: A cross-sectional study of the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023; 74:104707. [PMID: 37068368 PMCID: PMC10080862 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite strong recommendations for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) vaccination by multiple sclerosis (MS) organizations, some persons with MS (pwMS) remain vaccine hesitant. The Swiss MS Registry conducted a survey to explore Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy, self-reported side effects and changes in MS symptoms following vaccination in adult pwMS. METHODS Self-reported data were analyzed cross-sectionally. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore participant characteristics associated with Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS Of 849 respondents, 73 (8.6%) were unvaccinated. Hesitation to vaccinate was most often a personal preference (N = 42, 57.53%). Factors negatively associated with vaccine hesitancy included older age (OR = 0.97 per year, 95% CI [0.94, 0.99]) and regularly seeing healthcare professionals (OR = 0.25, 95% CI [0.07, 0.85]). A history of confirmed Covid-19 infection (OR = 3.38, 95% CI [1.69, 6.77]) and being underweight (OR = 4.50, 95% CI [1.52, 13.36]) were positively associated with vaccine hesitancy. Of 768 participants who provided information, 320 (41.2%) and 351 (45.2%) reported vaccination side effects after the first and second vaccinations, respectively. Changes in MS symptoms were reported by 49 (6.3%) participants after the first and 67 (9.0%) participants after the second vaccination, and were most often described as increased or new-onset fatigue (N = 17/49 (34.7%) after the first and N = 21/67 (31.3%) after the second dose). CONCLUSIONS Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy was low among surveyed pwMS. The risk of vaccine hesitancy was higher among younger pwMS, those with a history of Covid-19 infection, and those without regular contact with healthcare professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Stanikić
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland; Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eric Twomey
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Milo A Puhan
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian P Kamm
- Neurocentre, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Anke Salmen
- Neurocentre, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich (PUK), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Chiara Zecca
- Department of Neurology, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Claudio Gobbi
- Department of Neurology, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Viktor von Wyl
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland; Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Capone F, Rossi M, Cruciani A, Motolese F, Pilato F, Di Lazzaro V. Safety, immunogenicity, efficacy, and acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis: a narrative review. Neural Regen Res 2023; 18:284-288. [PMID: 35900404 PMCID: PMC9396498 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.346539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last two years, a new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) infection has spread worldwide leading to the death of millions. Vaccination represents the key factor in the global strategy against this pandemic, but it also poses several problems, especially for vulnerable people such as patients with multiple sclerosis. In this review, we have briefly summarized the main findings of the safety, efficacy, and acceptability of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination for multiple sclerosis patients. Although the acceptability of COVID-19 vaccines has progressively increased in the last year, a small but significant part of patients with multiple sclerosis still has relevant concerns about vaccination that make them hesitant about receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Overall, available data suggest that the COVID-19 vaccination is safe and effective in multiple sclerosis patients, even though some pharmacological treatments such as anti-CD20 therapies or sphingosine l-phosphate receptor modulators can reduce the immune response to vaccination. Accordingly, COVID-19 vaccination should be strongly recommended for people with multiple sclerosis and, in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapies and sphingosine l-phosphate receptor modulators, and clinicians should evaluate the appropriate timing for vaccine administration. Further studies are necessary to understand the role of cellular immunity in COVID-19 vaccination and the possible usefulness of booster jabs. On the other hand, it is mandatory to learn more about the reasons why people refuse vaccination. This would help to design a more effective communication campaign aimed at increasing vaccination coverage among vulnerable people.
Collapse
|
4
|
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among Italian people with multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci 2023; 44:803-808. [PMID: 36567409 PMCID: PMC9790761 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-06559-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vaccine hesitancy promotes the spread of infectious diseases including COVID-19 virus, limiting the herd immunity. Complications caused by COVID-19 in people with multiple sclerosis forced governments to ensure them prior access to vaccinations. Their propensity to be vaccinated needs to be assessed to promote adhesion to vaccination programs. The aim of this study was to explore the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy rate in pwMS. METHODS We conducted an observational study recruiting patients affected by multiple sclerosis followed at MS Clinical and Research Unit of Tor Vergata University, Rome. We invited them to fill in an online survey about their intent to get COVID-19 vaccination. Fisher's exact test and Kruskal-Wallis test were performed to explore differences in sociodemographic, clinical, and emotional variables relative to the opinions about vaccinations. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to assess the factorial structure of the questionnaire; Pearson's correlations between the factors and Big Five personality dimensions were also calculated. RESULTS Of 276 respondents, 90% was willing to get vaccinated, while only 1.4% was sure to refuse the vaccination. Education level, opinions on safety and efficacy of vaccines, and emotional status were found to be associated to the propensity of getting the COVID-19 vaccination (respectively: p = 0.012, p < 0.001, and p = 0.0001). Moreover, general opinions on healthcare system were related to the intention to get vaccinated. CONCLUSION Our results reinforce the importance of a good relationship between doctor and patient and the need to adapt doctors' communication strategy to patients' personalities and beliefs.
Collapse
|
5
|
Turova EL. [Relationship of patients with multiple sclerosis to vaccination against COVID-19]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2023; 123:29-33. [PMID: 37560831 DOI: 10.17116/jnevro202312307229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the attitude of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) to vaccination as a method of preventing infectious diseases, in particular, COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS The data of a survey of 408 patients with MS in the Sverdlovsk region in relation to vaccination against COVID-19, conducted using the original questionnaire, were analyzed. RESULTS According to the survey data, 266 (65.2%) patients with MS are positive about vaccination. 222 (54.4%) patients with MS refused vaccination. The most common reasons for refusal were - fear that the vaccine could worsen the state of health - 44.1%, coronavirus infection in the last 6 months - 14.85%, «I was always told that I should not be vaccinated» - 14.4%, a combination of the above answers - 16.65%. The accumulated world experience and our observations demonstrate the important role of vaccination of patients with MS from COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS It is necessary to rise the awareness of vaccination among patients with MS, since until recently this has been given insufficient attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E L Turova
- Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1, Yekaterinburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li H, Cheng L, Tao J, Chen D, Zeng C. Knowledge and willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine: a survey from Anhui Province, China. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2024064. [PMID: 35130110 PMCID: PMC8993089 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.2024064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Vaccinations can prevent COVID-19 and control its spread quickly and efficiently. This study aimed to investigate knowledge and willingness of geriatric care facility staff to receive a COVID-19 vaccine, and to provide a basis for the government to promote the COVID-19 vaccine and guide people to get vaccinated. STUDY DESIGN A cross-sectional study. METHODS Data on characteristics of the participants, knowledge about the COVID-19 vaccine, and willingness to get vaccinated for COVID-19 were collected through an online survey from May 19 to June 18, 2021. Statistical analyses were conducted with ANOVA, chi-square, logistic regression. RESULTS The survey illustrated that the highest score of COVID-19 vaccine knowledge was 50, the lowest 20, and the average 44.22. It also demonstrated that 91.3% of the participants had a good knowledge of COVID-19 vaccine, and that 97.3% participants were willing to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. The results showed that geriatric care facility staff had varied level of the COVID-19 vaccine knowledge depending upon their age, educational background, and other factors, and correspondingly, their willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccine was affected by their knowledge level of COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSIONS In general, the participants, the staff of geriatric care facilities in Anhui Province, had good mastery of the COVID-19 vaccine, and they were willing to get vaccinated. However, there still existed a few participants with poor knowledge, who were unwilling to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Government can guide people to accept vaccination by enhancing publicity about the effects and adverse reactions of COVID-19 vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huoba Li
- Department of Health and Elderly Care, Anhui Vocational College of City Management, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Lulu Cheng
- Department of Ophthalmology, Shenzhen Longgang District People’s Hospital, Shengzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Juan Tao
- Department of Health and Elderly Care, Anhui Vocational College of City Management, Hefei,Anhui, China
| | - Deyu Chen
- Medical College, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang, Anhui, China
| | - Chenchen Zeng
- Fuyang Health School, FuYang Institute of Technology, Fuyang, Anhui, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Steffens MS, Bullivant B, King C, Bolsewicz K. “I’m scared that if I have the vaccine, it’s going to make my lung condition worse, not better.” COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in adults with underlying health conditions – a qualitative investigation. Vaccine X 2022; 12:100243. [PMCID: PMC9686055 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Sustained uptake of COVID-19 vaccines, including booster doses, will continue to be key to minimising morbidity and mortality caused by COVID-19. Because hesitancy can affect people’s motivation to get vaccinated, understanding and addressing factors influencing acceptance is critical to achieving high uptake. This is especially the case for adults with underlying health conditions, who are at increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19. The aim of this study was to investigate barriers and facilitators of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in adults with underlying health conditions during the initial rollout of COVID-19 vaccines in Australia. Methods We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 15 adults with underlying health conditions in New South Wales (NSW) in April 2021, focusing on their previous vaccination experiences and feelings about COVID-19 vaccination. We categorised participants as accepting, hesitant or refusing. We analysed interviews thematically, informed by the World Health Organization (WHO) Behavioural and Social Drivers of Vaccination framework. Results Most (12/15) participants were hesitant about COVID-19 vaccination. Barriers to COVID-19 vaccine acceptance included concerns about vaccine safety and effectiveness; heightened perceptions of risk regarding the vaccines; low perceptions of COVID-19 risk; and negative social influences. Facilitators included perceived benefits of vaccination and positive social influences. Conclusions For some adults with underlying health conditions, perceptions of heightened vulnerability to COVID-19 vaccine side effects contributed to vaccine hesitancy during the initial rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. We recommend supporting GPs and specialists to proactively reach out and recommend COVID-19 vaccination to this population; encouraging chronic disease organisations to act as trusted advocates of COVID-19 vaccination; and actively communicating evolving knowledge about vaccine safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryke S Steffens
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney, NSW, Australia,The Children's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia,Corresponding author at: NCIRS, Locked Bag 4001, Westmead NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Bianca Bullivant
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney, NSW, Australia,The Children's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Catherine King
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney, NSW, Australia,The Children's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Katarzyna Bolsewicz
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney, NSW, Australia,The Children's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Maftei A, Petroi CE. "I'm luckier than everybody else!": Optimistic bias, COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, vaccination status, and the link with the time spent online, anticipated regret, and the perceived threat. Front Public Health 2022; 10:1019298. [PMID: 36457316 PMCID: PMC9706105 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1019298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The catastrophic wave in the fall of 2021 drove Romania to the top of the list of dangerous COVID-19 infections, with the highest mortality rate in Europe. At the same time, Romania had one of the lowest vaccination rates. In this context, the present research aimed to explore the link between vaccination intention/status, optimistic bias, COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, the time spent online, and vaccination (anticipated) regret. Our convenience sample was formed by 408 adults aged 18-63 years (M = 22.11, SD = 6.18, 69.9 % females), who were distributed into four groups: (1) non-vaccinated who definitely refused COVID-19 vaccination, (2) non-vaccinated who considered COVID-19 vaccination, (3) non-vaccinated who reported their absolute willingness to COVID-19 vaccination, and (4) people who were COVID-19 vaccinated. We conducted our analyses separately, depending on these groups (i.e., vaccination intentions/status). Data were collected using an online questionnaire between November 10, 2021, and January 03, 2022. In our cross-sectional approach, following correlation and ANOVA analyses, among the observed patterns were (1) the significant negative relation between optimism bias and the perceived COVID-19 threat; (2) the positive link between anticipated regret, post-vaccination regret, age, and conspiracy beliefs. We discuss our findings considering their contribution to health policies and practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Maftei
- Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iaşi, Romania
| | - Cosmina Elena Petroi
- Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iaşi, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fattahi MR, Iranmehr A, Saeedi R, Sahraian MA, Doosti R, Moghadasi AN. Assessment of COVID-19 vaccine attitude in people with multiple sclerosis, its correlation with demographic factors, and fear of coronavirus: A cross-sectional survey. CURRENT JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY 2022; 21:230-235. [PMID: 38011337 PMCID: PMC10189200 DOI: 10.18502/cjn.v21i4.11720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
Background: Despite special global considerations which have been made to prioritize vaccination of people with multiple sclerosis (MS), some are reluctant to get vaccinated. This study was aimed to evaluate the attitude toward coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccine and its probable correlations. Methods: Considering the study objectives, two valid questionnaires including Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) and attitude questionnaires were administered pre and post COVID-19 vaccination among people with MS. Results: The questionnaires were administered among 349 people with MS pre and post vaccination. The mean age of participants was 38.78 ± 8.68 (range: 19 to 64) years. They all received the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine (Sinopharm). Although about 90% of participants felt satisfied after getting vaccinated and respected the preventive actions like social distancing and wearing face mask after vaccination, about 40% of them did not recommend vaccination to other patients. None of the demographic data was predictor of attitude score in COVID-19 vaccine and the only effective factor regarding fear of COVID-19 among people with MS was gender (P = 0.001). It was found that the more a patient's fear score was, the more he/she felt satisfied after vaccination. Those patients who had got the influenza vaccine last year felt more satisfied with the vaccine and accepted the COVID-19 vaccine easier than others. Conclusion: This study revealed that there was an inverse correlation between fear of coronavirus and less trust in the vaccine in patients with MS. However, it should be mentioned that the patients felt more satisfied after COVID-19 vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Reza Fattahi
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Arad Iranmehr
- Neurological Surgery Ward, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Roghayyeh Saeedi
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Ali Sahraian
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Rozita Doosti
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abdorreza Naser Moghadasi
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kim E, Haag A, Nguyen J, Kesselman MM, Demory Beckler M. Vaccination of multiple sclerosis patients during the COVID-19 era: Novel insights into vaccine safety and immunogenicity. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 67:104172. [PMID: 36116380 PMCID: PMC9462931 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an incurable autoimmune disease known to cause widespread demyelinating lesions in the central nervous system (CNS) and a host of debilitating symptoms in patients. The development of MS is believed to be driven by the breakdown of the blood brain barrier, subsequent infiltration by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and widespread CNS inflammation and demyelination. Disease modifying therapies (DMTs) profoundly disrupt these processes and therefore compose an essential component of disease management. However, the effects of these therapeutic agents on vaccine safety and immunogenicity in individuals with MS are not yet fully understood. As such, the primary objective of this review article was to summarize the findings of recently conducted studies on vaccine safety and immunogenicity in MS patients treated with DMTs, particularly in the context of the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Discussed in this review are vaccinations against influenza, yellow fever, human papillomavirus, measles, mumps, rubella, Streptococcus pneumoniae, hepatitis B, and COVID-19. This article additionally reviews our current understanding of COVID-19 severity and incidence in this patient population, the risks and benefits of vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and vaccination guidelines set forth by MS societies and organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enoch Kim
- Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States of America.
| | - Alyssa Haag
- Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States of America.
| | - Jackie Nguyen
- Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States of America.
| | - Marc M Kesselman
- Division of Rheumatology, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States of America.
| | - Michelle Demory Beckler
- Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Heidler F, Baldt J, Frahm N, Langhorst SE, Mashhadiakbar P, Streckenbach B, Burian K, Zettl UK, Richter J. Vaccination willingness in association with personality traits in patients with multiple sclerosis in the course of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Sci Rep 2022; 12:15147. [PMID: 36071083 PMCID: PMC9449937 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18912-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccination is a key strategy for controlling the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines by chronically ill patients, such as multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, plays an important role in prevention of complicated disease course. This longitudinal, prospective, multi-centre-study of German MS-patients aimed to detect socio-demographic, clinical, or psychological determinants of attitudes towards standard vaccines, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and governmental measures before/during the pandemic. Exactly 404 MS-patients were investigated by standardized questionnaires and structured interviews on socio-demographic, clinical-neurological, and psychological characteristics, vaccination status, and vaccination from June 2019. Data on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination willingness were collected in two follow-up assessments (1st: June to July 2020, before SARS-CoV-2 vaccine availability, N = 200; 2nd: March to May 2021, after SARS-CoV-2 vaccine availability, N = 157). Age, sex, MS course type, depression, and personality characteristics (Extraversion, Novelty seeking, Self-directedness, and Cooperativeness) were significantly associated with vaccination willingness. Although the majority of MS-patients showed SARS-CoV-2 vaccination willingness at both follow-ups (1st: 60%, 2nd: 61%), a substantial proportion had concerns and were undecided or opposed to vaccination. Socio-demographic variables like age and sex, psychopathological status, and various personality characteristics might influence vaccination willingness and should be considered when discussing with MS-patients about SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicita Heidler
- Department of Neurology, Ecumenic Hainich Hospital gGmbH, Pfafferode 102, 99974, Mühlhausen, Germany
| | - Julia Baldt
- Department of Neurology, Neuroimmunology Section, University Medical Centre of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany
| | - Niklas Frahm
- Department of Neurology, Neuroimmunology Section, University Medical Centre of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany.
| | - Silvan Elias Langhorst
- Department of Neurology, Neuroimmunology Section, University Medical Centre of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany
| | - Pegah Mashhadiakbar
- Department of Neurology, Neuroimmunology Section, University Medical Centre of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany
| | - Barbara Streckenbach
- Department of Neurology, Neuroimmunology Section, University Medical Centre of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany
| | - Katja Burian
- Department of Neurology, Neuroimmunology Section, University Medical Centre of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany
| | - Uwe Klaus Zettl
- Department of Neurology, Neuroimmunology Section, University Medical Centre of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany
| | - Jörg Richter
- Department of Neurology, Ecumenic Hainich Hospital gGmbH, Pfafferode 102, 99974, Mühlhausen, Germany.,Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK.,Durham Law School, Durham University, Durham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Renzi E, Baccolini V, Migliara G, Bellotta C, Ceparano M, Donia P, Marzuillo C, De Vito C, Villari P, Massimi A. Mapping the Prevalence of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance at the Global and Regional Level: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:1488. [PMID: 36146566 PMCID: PMC9506365 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10091488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the availability of effective and safe vaccines, the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination is suboptimal. In this meta-analysis we quantified the prevalence estimates of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance with a specific focus on worldwide geographical differences. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycInfo up to April 2021 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021235328). Generalized random-effects linear models with a logit link were used to calculate the pooled estimated rate of vaccine acceptance at both the global and regional level. A meta-regression analysis was performed to assess the association between COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and various characteristics of the studies. Overall, 71 articles yielding 128 prevalence estimates were included. The pooled prevalence of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance rate was 66% (95% CI: 61-71%). This varied by geographic area, ranging from 36% (95% CI: 18-60%) in Africa to 83% (95% CI: 82-84%) in Oceania, and there was high variability between countries (15.4% Cameroon-100% Bhutan). Meta-regression analysis showed that studies that investigated COVID-19 vaccination intentions using multiple choice/scoring gave a vaccine acceptance prevalence lower than studies with only two possible answers (yes/no) (ß: -1.02 95% CI: -1.41 to -0.63). Despite some variation in the estimates, the results showed that one in three people may refuse/delay COVID-19 vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Renzi
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Baccolini
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Migliara
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Ciro Bellotta
- National Hospital A.O.R.N. “Antonio Cardarelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Mariateresa Ceparano
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Donia
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Carolina Marzuillo
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Corrado De Vito
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Villari
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Azzurra Massimi
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Alroughani R, Al-Hashel J, Abokalawa F, AlMojel M, Farouk Ahmed S. COVID-19 vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis, real-life experience. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2022; 220:107374. [PMID: 35961255 PMCID: PMC9293951 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type-2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus is recommended in multiple sclerosis (MS) to reduce the risk of complications from Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. These vaccines were not investigated in people with MS (PWMS). OBJECTIVE This study aimed to report the short-term safety of the COVID-19 vaccines among PWMS. METHODS Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA (BNT162b2) vaccine and Oxford-Astra Zenecaa chimpanzee adenovirus-vectored (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccine have been approved to be used in Kuwait since December 2021. PWMS registered in Kuwait national registry were contacted by phone, WhatsApp, or through face-to-face interviews and were invited to complete our questionnaire. Demographic, clinical data, symptoms following the vaccine, worsening of pre-existing MS symptoms, and occurrence of relapse were recorded. RESULTS Of the 820 PWMS, 647 completed the questionnaire. Between January 2021 and 31 August 2021, 383 (59.28%) PWMS received at least one dose of the approved vaccinations versus 63.4% of the general population on the same date. Their mean age was 36.82 + 8.80, and most of them, 247 (64.3%), were females. A total of 356 vaccinated cohorts (92.6%) were treated with disease-modifying therapies. Adverse events were reported by 261 (68.15%) subjects. One case of COVID-19 infection was encountered after the first dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine. Twenty-one (5.48%) cases reported worsening of pre-existing MS symptoms after the vaccine. Five patients (1.31%) reported relapse after the COVID-19 vaccine. The most common adverse events of the COVID-19 vaccine were pain at the injection site, fatigue, low-grade fever, and body ache; and resolved within one week. There was no significant association between use of disease modifying therapy (DMT) and COVID-19 vaccine adverse events. CONCLUSION BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 are safe for PWMS. No increased risk of relapse activity or worsening of pre-existing MS symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raed Alroughani
- Division of Neurology, Amiri Hospital, Arabian Gulf Street, Sharq 13041, Kuwait; MS Clinic, Ibn Sina Hospital, P.O. Box 25427, Safat 13115, Kuwait.
| | - Jasem Al-Hashel
- Department of Neurology, Ibn Sina Hospital, P.O. Box 25427, Safat 13115, Kuwait; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, P.O. Box 24923, Safat 13110, Kuwait.
| | - Fathi Abokalawa
- Department of Neurology, Ibn Sina Hospital, P.O. Box 25427, Safat 13115, Kuwait.
| | - Malak AlMojel
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, P.O. Box 24923, Safat 13110, Kuwait.
| | - Samar Farouk Ahmed
- Department of Neurology, Ibn Sina Hospital, P.O. Box 25427, Safat 13115, Kuwait; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Minia University, P.O. Box 61519, Minia 61111, Egypt.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Vaccination-The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Representations. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19159268. [PMID: 35954625 PMCID: PMC9368462 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Vaccine hesitation is a topic of utmost importance, with the COVID-19 pandemic serving as a clear reminder of its timeliness. Besides evaluating COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in a sample of Portuguese people, this study aims at understanding cognitive and emotional representations related to vaccination, and their influence on vaccination hesitation. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between 27 December 2020 and 27 January 2021. It assessed cognitive and emotional COVID-19 representations; vaccination status; cognitive and emotional representations of vaccination and perceived necessity and concerns about vaccines. Of 31 × 58 participants, 91% accepted taking a COVID-19 vaccine. Among several other significant findings, women (71.3%) more often considered that the pandemic affected their lives (p < 0.001) and were more often concerned with being infected (p < 0.001). Likewise, there were significantly more female participants concerned about taking a COVID-19 vaccine and its possible effects, when compared to the number of male participants (p < 0.001). The number of participants with a higher education level that were more worried about becoming infected was greater (p = 0.001), when compared with those less educated. Regarding age groups, people aged 18 to 24 had fewer concerned participants (9.6%), while the number of individuals aged 55 to 64 had the most (p < 0.001). Somewhat surprisingly, perceiving oneself as extremely informed about COVID-19 was not associated with greater vaccine acceptance (OR = 1.534 [1.160−2.029]; (p = 0.003)). Moreover, people aged 25 to 64 years old and with lower education level were more likely not to accept vaccination (OR = 2.799 [1.085−7.221]; (p = 0.033)). Finally, being more concerned about taking a vaccine lowers its acceptance (OR = 4.001 [2.518−6.356]; (p < 0.001)). Cognitive and emotional representations have a great impact and are reliable predictors of vaccine acceptance. Thus, it is of extreme importance that public health messages be adapted to the different characteristics of the population.
Collapse
|
15
|
Yazdani A, Mirmosayyeb O, Ghaffary EM, Hashemi MS, Ghajarzadeh M. COVID-19 vaccines and patients with multiple sclerosis: willingness, unwillingness and hesitancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci 2022; 43:4085-4094. [PMID: 35381877 PMCID: PMC8983030 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-06051-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the pooled prevalence of vaccination willingness, unwillingness, and hesitancy among patients with multiple sclerosis. Methods Databases including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched. by two expert researchers, as well as references in the included studies, which were published before October 2021. Results Three hundred eighty articles were found in four data bases. One hundred eighty-two studies remained following deleting duplicates. Finally, ten studies remained for the meta-analysis. Totally, 5983 patients with MS were assessed. The pooled prevalence of willingness to vaccination among patients with MS was 76% (95% CI: 67–85%) (I2 = 98.4%, p < 0.001). Unwillingness pooled prevalence to vaccination among patients with MS was 2% (95% CI: 2–3%) (I2 = 97.9%, p < 0.001). Hesitancy pooled prevalence to vaccination among patients with MS was 0% (I2 = 98%, p < 0.001). Conclusion According to the findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis, more than two-thirds of patients with MS were willing to obtain COVID-19 vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amid Yazdani
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Omid Mirmosayyeb
- Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.,Universal Council of Epidemiology (UCE), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Elham Moases Ghaffary
- Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Mozhgan Sadat Hashemi
- Students's Scientific Research Center (SSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahsa Ghajarzadeh
- Universal Council of Epidemiology (UCE), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran. .,Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Panisset MG, Kilpatrick T, Cofré Lizama LE, Galea MP. Implementing education: Personal communication with a healthcare professional is a critical step to address vaccine hesitancy for people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 63:103933. [PMID: 35671672 PMCID: PMC9158244 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) were first able to access COVID-19 vaccines in Australia from March 2021, when vaccine hesitancy in the general population was high (14–43%). High uptake of vaccination is important globally and critical to protect this vulnerable population. We conducted an on-line survey to examine factors influencing COVID-19 vaccination willingness among PwMS in Australia. Methods 149 PwMS living in Australia completed the on-line survey (April-September 2021) examining demographic, environmental and clinical factors with respect to vaccine willingness, including attitudes towards COVID-19 illness and vaccines. Additional items explored the influence of different information sources on vaccination decisions. Continuous and ordinal data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. All tests were two-tailed, with alpha set at 0.5. Results A majority of the respondents were female (87.2%) with relapsing-remitting MS (77.5%) treated by a neurologist (94.0%). A majority were on high efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) (64.9%), while 19.9% were on no DMTs. About one third of respondents (32.9%) had had two doses, 20.8% had received their first dose, and 22.1% were unvaccinated, while 24.2% of responses were missing. When asked about vaccine intentions, 60.6% of the unvaccinated indicated they were likely to extremely likely to get vaccinated, while 15.2% were very unlikely or extremely unlikely to do so and 24.2% were undecided. Unvaccinated people were significantly more concerned about vaccine side effects (mean 5.3 versus 3.1/10; p < .001). Only 53.3% of people on DMTs were vaccinated, compared to 75% of those who were not. People on ocrelizumab therapy (n = 35) had a lower vaccination rate (39%) than those on other medications (n = 86, 59%). Vaccine willingness in the unvaccinated was most highly correlated with knowledge regarding the vaccine (rs2=.709), agreement with the statement that COVID-19 vaccination is “too new for me to be confident about getting vaccinated” (rs2= -.709), anticipation of regret due to side effects of vaccination (rs2= -.642), and lack of knowledge regarding interactions between COVID-19 vaccines and DMTs (rs2= -.570). Almost two thirds had read MS-specific information about COVID-19 vaccinations and found it easy to understand (67.6%) and applicable to their situation (53.6%). However, less than half (47.8%) reported the information helped them make a personal vaccination decision. Over two-thirds (64.9%) had discussed vaccinations with their healthcare professional and 31.1% had not. Those who had not, were significantly more uninformed about the interactions of the vaccine with MS medications (mean 3.9 versus 2.9/10; p = .044) and significantly lower intention of vaccine uptake than those who had (mean 5.8 versus 7.9/10; p = .009). Conclusion Our study highlights that vaccination efforts should be delivered by healthcare professionals, focus on educating those who are managed with DMTs, and include individual recommendations related to specific DMTs, how the vaccines work, expectations regarding potential side-effects, potential exacerbation of MS symptoms, likelihood of recovery from any exacerbation, and the relative risks of side effects versus COVID-19 infection. Specific recommendations are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M G Panisset
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Clinical Sciences Building 601, Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia.
| | - T Kilpatrick
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Clinical Sciences Building 601, Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia; MS Unit, Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne Brain Centre, Level 5, 30 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - L E Cofré Lizama
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Clinical Sciences Building 601, Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia; School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia
| | - M P Galea
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Clinical Sciences Building 601, Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia; Department of Rehabilitation, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Royal Park Campus, 34-45 Poplar Rd, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; Australia Australian Rehabilitation Research Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Royal Park Campus, 34-45 Poplar Rd, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
El Gamal M, Siddiqua A, Abdul WK, Almurshidi BH, Howari FM. Investigation of factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among communities of universities in the United Arab Emirates. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2068930. [PMID: 35594545 PMCID: PMC9302497 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2068930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic affected the lives of people living across the world and the development of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 is considered to be one of the most promising solutions to contain the COVID-19 pandemic. In several countries, we are witnessing hesitancy toward COVID-19 vaccines, which is a complex phenomenon influenced by a variety of factors. A cross-sectional study was performed to comprehensively investigate the impact of factors like demography, COVID-19 pandemic-induced behavior, and vaccine attitude on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (VA) among communities of five different universities in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). To investigate the effect of demography and COVID-19 pandemic-induced behavioral factors, Analysis of Variance was perfomed. The effect of COVID-19 vaccine attitudes on COVID-19 VA was examined through partial least squares-structural equations modeling. The results of the study showed no difference among the population in accepting COVID-19 vaccines due to their demographic factors. The effect of pandemic-induced behavioral factors on COVID-19 VA suggested that the people of UAE accepted COVID-19 vaccines irrespective of the movement and travel restrictions imposed due to the pandemic. The results on the effect of vaccine attitudes on COVID-19 VA showed that vaccine benefit attitudes, safety concerns, and trust in health-care professionals (TrHP) were found to be significant factors in VA. Furthermore, TrHP was found to reduce the negative effect of safety concerns related to COVID-19 VA. The findings broadly highlight that COVID-19 VA in the UAE was not hampered by demographic factors and the pandemic-induced behavioral constraints. The study also showed that people with co-morbidities had lower level of COVID-19 VA than people with no co-morbidities. To improve COVID-19 VA, the perceived benefits with COVID-19 vaccine and TrHP must be enhanced and simultaneously safety concerns of the vaccines need to be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maisa El Gamal
- College of Natural and Health Sciences, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Ayisha Siddiqua
- College of Natural and Health Sciences, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | | | | | - Fares M Howari
- College of Natural and Health Sciences, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Müller F, Heinemann S, Hummers E, Noack EM, Heesen G, Dopfer-Jablonka A, Mikuteit M, Niewolik J, Steffens S, Schröder D. [Immunosuppressed people's beliefs, expectations, and experiences with COVID-19 vaccinations : Results of a longitudinal study]. Z Rheumatol 2022; 82:342-354. [PMID: 35523964 PMCID: PMC9075708 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-022-01213-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunocompromised people are less likely to be vaccinated, despite an increased benefit of many vaccinations in terms of benefit-risk assessment, including the vaccines against SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19). Attitudes, expectations, and experiences with previous vaccinations influence the decision to get vaccinated. OBJECTIVE To explore the attitudes of immunocompromised people towards vaccinations in general and COVID-19 vaccination in particular and their experiences with COVID-19 vaccinations. MATERIAL AND METHODS As part of the CoCo Immune study, immunocompromised participants were surveyed in the spring and summer of 2021 (1 November 2021-7 September 2021) using questionnaires. Initially, they were asked about their expectations concerning a COVID-19 vaccination and followed up about their experience after COVID-19 vaccination. In addition, sociodemographic data, general attitudes toward vaccinations and experiences with previous vaccinations were collected. Analysis was performed using descriptive and bivariate statistics. RESULTS The 243 participants mostly approved vaccinations and expected the COVID-19 vaccination to be effective and well-tolerated. Women were more concerned about the safety of vaccinations and were more often worried about side effects. Older persons felt better informed than younger persons. Participants who reported subjective side effects of previous vaccinations were more skeptical about vaccinations as well as the government institutions that recommend vaccinations. They less often agreed with the statement "in retrospect, the COVID-19 vaccination has been harmless for me so far". DISCUSSION The participants mostly expressed a positive attitude and anticipation towards COVID-19 vaccinations; however, the age and sex differences found suggest that there are different information needs which should be addressed when educating individuals about vaccinations or designing vaccination campaigns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Müller
- Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Humboldtallee 38, 37073, Göttingen, Deutschland.
| | - Stephanie Heinemann
- Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Humboldtallee 38, 37073, Göttingen, Deutschland
| | - Eva Hummers
- Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Humboldtallee 38, 37073, Göttingen, Deutschland
| | - Eva Maria Noack
- Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Humboldtallee 38, 37073, Göttingen, Deutschland
| | - Gloria Heesen
- Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Humboldtallee 38, 37073, Göttingen, Deutschland
| | - Alexandra Dopfer-Jablonka
- Klinik für Rheumatologie und Immunologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
- Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung, Hannover-Braunschweig, Deutschland
| | - Marie Mikuteit
- Klinik für Rheumatologie und Immunologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Jacqueline Niewolik
- Klinik für Rheumatologie und Immunologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Sandra Steffens
- Klinik für Rheumatologie und Immunologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Dominik Schröder
- Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Humboldtallee 38, 37073, Göttingen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rakusa M, Öztürk S, Moro E, Helbok R, Bassetti CL, Beghi E, Bereczki D, Bodini B, Di Liberto G, Jenkins TM, Macerollo A, Maia LF, Martinelli-Boneschi F, Pisani A, Priori A, Sauerbier A, Soffietti R, Taba P, von Oertzen TJ, Zedde M, Crean M, Burlica A, Cavallieri F, Sellner J. COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among people with chronic neurological disorders: a position paper. Eur J Neurol 2022; 29:2163-2172. [PMID: 35460319 PMCID: PMC9111566 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose Health risks associated with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection are undisputed. Moreover, the capability of vaccination to prevent symptomatic, severe, and fatal COVID‐19 is recognized. There is also early evidence that vaccination can reduce the chance for long COVID‐19. Nonetheless, the willingness to get vaccinated and receive booster shots remains subpar among people with neurologic disorders. Vaccine scepticism not only jeopardizes collective efforts to end the COVID‐19 pandemic but puts individual lives at risk, as some chronic neurologic diseases are associated with a higher risk for an unfavorable COVID‐19 course. Methods In this position paper, the NeuroCOVID‐19 Task Force of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) summarizes the current knowledge on the prognosis of COVID‐19 among patients with neurologic disease, elucidates potential barriers to vaccination coverage, and formulates strategies to overcome vaccination hesitancy. A survey among the Task Force members on the phenomenon of vaccination hesitancy among people with neurologic disease supports the lines of argumentation. Results The study revealed that people with multiple sclerosis and other nervous system autoimmune disorders are most skeptical of SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination. The prevailing concerns included the chance of worsening the pre‐existing neurological condition, vaccination‐related adverse events, and drug interaction. Conclusions The EAN NeuroCOVID‐19 Task Force reinforces the key role of neurologists as advocates of COVID‐19 vaccination. Neurologists need to argue in the interest of their patients about the overwhelming individual and global benefits of COVID‐19 vaccination. Moreover, they need to keep on eye on this vulnerable patient group, its concerns, and the emergence of potential safety signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Rakusa
- Department of Neurologic Diseases, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Serefnur Öztürk
- Department of Neurology and Neurointensive Care, Selcuk University, Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Turkey
| | - Elena Moro
- Grenoble Alpes University, Division of Neurology, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Raimund Helbok
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.,Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Claudio L Bassetti
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ettore Beghi
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniel Bereczki
- Department of Neurology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Benedetta Bodini
- Department of Neurology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.,Paris Brain Institute, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Giovanni Di Liberto
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thomas M Jenkins
- Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.,Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Antonella Macerollo
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool, UK.,Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - Luis F Maia
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Filippo Martinelli-Boneschi
- Neurology Unit and MS Centre, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.,Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (DEPT), Dino Ferrari Centre, Neuroscience Section, University of Milan, Milan
| | - Antonio Pisani
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.,IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alberto Priori
- Division of Neurology, Department of Neurology, 'Aldo Ravelli' Research Center, University of Milan and ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Sauerbier
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Neurology, Cologne, Germany
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Pille Taba
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tartu, Estonia.,Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Tim J von Oertzen
- Department of Neurology, Neuromed Campus, Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria.,Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | - Marialuisa Zedde
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Michael Crean
- European Academy of Neurology (EAN) Head Office, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anja Burlica
- European Academy of Neurology (EAN) Head Office, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Cavallieri
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.,Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Johann Sellner
- Department of Neurology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Mistelbach, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wang Z, Chen L, Xiao J, Jiang F, Min W, Liu S, Wang Y, Qi M. Subjective health status: an easily available, independent, robust and significant predictive factor at the prometaphase of vaccination programs for the vaccination behavior of Chinese adults. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:180. [PMID: 35287644 PMCID: PMC8920520 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-03830-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization (WHO) proposed COVID-19 vaccination as an emergent and important method to end the COVID-19 pandemic. Since China started vaccination programs in December 2020, vaccination has spread to provinces and municipalities nationwide. Previous research has focused on people's vaccination willingness and its influencing factors but has not examined vaccination behavior. We examine the effectiveness of psychosocial factors in predicting vaccination behavior. METHODS A cross-sectional online survey was performed among Chinese adults on 8 May and 4 June 2021. The statistical analysis of the data included univariate analysis, receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis and ordinal multiclassification logistic regression model analysis. RESULTS Of the 1300 respondents, 761 (58.5%) were vaccinated. Univariate analysis showed that a high education level and good subjective health status were protective factors for vaccination behavior, while suffering from chronic diseases was a risk factor. ROC analysis showed that subjective health status (AUC = 0.625, 95% CI: 0.594-0.656, P < 0.001) was the best predictor of vaccination behavior. Logistic regression analysis with subjective health status as a dependent variable indicated that older age, female sex, depression, neurasthenia, obsession, hypochondriasis and chronic disease were significant risk factors, while positive coping tendencies were a significant protective factor. CONCLUSION Our study found a simple and effective marker, subjective health status, that can predict vaccination behavior. This finding can guide future epidemic prevention work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zuxing Wang
- Sichuan Provincial Center for Mental Health, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, 610072, China.
- Key Laboratory of Psychosomatic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu, 610072, China.
| | - Lili Chen
- Sichuan Provincial Center for Mental Health, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, 610072, China
- Key Laboratory of Psychosomatic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu, 610072, China
| | - Jun Xiao
- Sichuan Provincial Center for Mental Health, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, 610072, China
- Key Laboratory of Psychosomatic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu, 610072, China
| | - Fugui Jiang
- Sichuan Provincial Center for Mental Health, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, 610072, China
- Key Laboratory of Psychosomatic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu, 610072, China
| | - Wenjiao Min
- Sichuan Provincial Center for Mental Health, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, 610072, China
- Key Laboratory of Psychosomatic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu, 610072, China
| | - Shuyun Liu
- The People's Hospital of Wenjiang Chengdu, 86 Kangtai Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, 611135, China
| | - Yunqiong Wang
- Sichuan Provincial Center for Mental Health, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, 610072, China
- Key Laboratory of Psychosomatic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu, 610072, China
| | - Mengsha Qi
- The People's Hospital of Wenjiang Chengdu, 86 Kangtai Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, 611135, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jiang N, Gu P, Sun X, Han H, Liu W, Song N, Jiang X. Acceptance of COVID‐19 vaccines in patients with chronic diseases: A cross‐sectional study. J Clin Nurs 2022; 31:3286-3300. [PMID: 35285111 PMCID: PMC9115274 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Aims and objectives This study aimed to clarify the attitudes, knowledge and vaccination willingness of patients with chronic diseases toward COVID‐19 vaccines and the influencing factors. Background Vaccination against COVID‐19 is an important way to protect patients with chronic diseases, but the vaccination acceptance varies across diseases and populations. A better understanding of this condition will lead to tailored intervention strategies and high vaccination rates. Design Cross‐sectional study. Methods Data were collected between March 2021 and May 2021 in China. A self‐compiled questionnaire was used in the survey. Two independent‐samples t‐tests/one‐way analysis of variance or U test/H test was used to measure the differences between groups. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify the influencing factors. The study adhered to the EQUATOR checklist, STROBE. Results A total of 998 patients participated in the study. Score rates of attitudes, knowledge and vaccination willingness were 69.9%, 68.4% and 70.6% respectively. Age, vaccination status of family members, education levels, vaccine side effects and economic level were positive factors that could influence patients’ vaccination acceptances, while time of illness, type of disease and political affiliations were negative predictors. The top reasons for willingness toward vaccination were supporting national strategies, belief on the vaccines and fearing of contracting COVID‐19, while physical reasons, side effects and having a wait‐and‐see attitude were unwillingness factors. Conclusions Patients’ attitudes, knowledge and vaccination willingness were medium. Nurses should pay attention to patients who are from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, under 30 or over 70 years old, have no political affiliations, have damage to vital organs, have a long course of illness, family members have not received COVID‐19 vaccines and had no side effects after receiving other vaccines. Relevance to clinical practice Clinical nurses are recommended to take measures from patients’ duration of illness, damaged organs, demographic characteristics and families to improve patients’ vaccination acceptances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Jiang
- West China School of Nursing/West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu China
- School of Nursing Shandong First Medical University Taian China
| | - Pengfei Gu
- School of Foreign Languages Shandong First Medical University Taian China
| | - Xian Sun
- Neurology Department Tianjin Third Central Hospital Tianjin China
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology Tai’ an City Tumor Prevention Hospital Taian China
| | - Wenwen Liu
- Department of Respiratory Medicine Joint Logistic Support Force of the People's Liberation Army Taian China
| | - Na Song
- Department of Hemodialysis Joint Logistic Support Force of the People's Liberation Army Taian China
| | - Xiaolian Jiang
- West China School of Nursing/West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Krzystanek E, Jurczak A, Kocur K, Jurkiewicz J, Kaczmarczyk A. Awareness of COVID-19 Symptoms, Risk Factors, and Vaccinations in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19063366. [PMID: 35329050 PMCID: PMC8951455 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system, affecting around 2.8 million people worldwide. Patients’ knowledge about COVID-19 infection, and their proper protective actions, may reduce the risk of infection. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge of patients with MS about SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 illness, the relationship between MS and COVID-19, willingness to be vaccinated, and the impact of the pandemic on MS care. An original, anonymous, 35-items, self-reported questionnaire was used in both web-based and on-site survey formats. Two-hundred and forty-eight questionnaires were analyzed (mean age 40.8 ± 10.6 years, 77.8% women). Participants reported the use of multiple sources of information, and the most common were websites (77.8%) and television (59.3%). The majority of participants knew the correct symptoms of COVID-19 or transmission routes (94.4%), and accepted the pandemic’s restrictions (96.8%). A total of 93.2% considered SARS-CoV-2 as highly infectious, and 69% thought they were at higher risk of being infected with SARS-CoV-2, mainly because of immunodeficiency (82.7%). Although most of them were afraid of COVID-19 (69.0%), only two-thirds wanted to be vaccinated. Patients who were afraid of COVID-19 had a 3.5-times higher chance to declare willingness for vaccination. A total of 29.8% patients claimed that the COVID-19 pandemic limited access to the healthcare system. This study shows that Polish patients with MS represent a good level of knowledge about COVID-19 disease, and acceptance for public rules, but their willingness for vaccinations is not sufficient. Country-wide educational campaigns should be conducted, particularly on the internet and TV. Restrictions in healthcare facilities should be balanced to secure access for patients with MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewa Krzystanek
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-635 Katowice, Poland
- Correspondence:
| | - Agata Jurczak
- Students’ Scientific Association, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland; (A.J.); (K.K.); (J.J.)
| | - Kinga Kocur
- Students’ Scientific Association, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland; (A.J.); (K.K.); (J.J.)
| | - Jakub Jurkiewicz
- Students’ Scientific Association, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland; (A.J.); (K.K.); (J.J.)
| | - Aleksandra Kaczmarczyk
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Norhayati MN, Che Yusof R, Azman YM. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:783982. [PMID: 35155467 PMCID: PMC8828741 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.783982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vaccination is an essential intervention to curb the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This review aimed to estimate the pooled proportion of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance worldwide. METHODS A systematic search of the MEDLINE (PubMed) database using "COVID-19," "vaccine" and "acceptance" to obtain original research articles published between 2020 and July 2021. Only studies with full text and that were published in English were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute meta-analysis was used to assess the data quality. The meta-analysis was performed using generic inverse variance with a random-effects model using the Review Manager software. RESULTS A total of 172 studies across 50 countries worldwide were included. Subgroup analyses were performed with regard to vaccine acceptance, regions, population, gender, vaccine effectiveness, and survey time. The pooled proportion of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was 61% (95% CI: 59, 64). It was higher in Southeast Asia, among healthcare workers, in males, for vaccines with 95% effectiveness, and during the first survey. CONCLUSION COVID-19 vaccine acceptance needs to be increased to achieve herd immunity to protect the population from the disease. It is crucial to enhance public awareness of COVID-19 vaccination and improve access to vaccines. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO 2021, identifier CRD42021268645.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohd Noor Norhayati
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia
| | - Ruhana Che Yusof
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia
| | - Yacob Mohd Azman
- Medical Practice Division, Ministry of Health, Federal Government Administrative Centre, Putrajaya, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
COVID-19 Vaccination Willingness and Acceptability in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Cross Sectional Study in Iran. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10010135. [PMID: 35062796 PMCID: PMC8778456 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10010135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, predominantly immune-mediated degenerative disease of the central nervous system. Due to prolonged use of immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive medications, vaccine hesitancy could be common among MS patients. Our main aim in the current study was to evaluate the willingness and acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with MS. In our multicenter cross-sectional questionnaire-based clinical study, 892 patients completed the questionnaire between May to June 2021. The questionnaire consisted of demographic data, MS disease-related factors, history of COVID-19 infection/vaccination, and any existing comorbidities. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 19. Overall, 68% of the participants expressed willingness to be vaccinated. Major causes of vaccine refusal in our patients were the fear of reducing the efficacy of disease modifying drugs (DMDs) upon vaccination as well as distrusting the vaccines and overestimation bias in the power of their innate immunity and potential COVID-19 resistance. Some demographic factors affected vaccination enthusiasm in our study. Our findings did not show significant correlation between the age and comorbidity and vaccine willingness. Only one-third of our patients received their vaccine information from healthcare providers. The majority of them received these data from official broadcasting channels and social media. However, despite several concerns, the willingness of COVD-19 vaccination in the Iranian MS patients is remarkable.
Collapse
|
25
|
Capone F, Lucchini M, Ferraro E, Bianco A, Rossi M, Cicia A, Cortese A, Cruciani A, De Arcangelis V, De Giglio L, Motolese F, Sancetta B, Mirabella M, Di Lazzaro V. Immunogenicity and safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in people with multiple sclerosis treated with different disease-modifying therapies. Neurotherapeutics 2022; 19:325-333. [PMID: 34859382 PMCID: PMC8639214 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-021-01165-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The potential impact of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) on COVID-19 vaccination is poorly understood. According to recent observations, the humoral immune response could be impaired in patients treated with ocrelizumab or fingolimod. Our study evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in a convenience sample of 140 MS patients treated with different DMTs, undergoing vaccination between April and June 2021. Humoral immune response was tested 1 month after the second dose, using a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay to detect IgG against SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein. We explored the potential correlation between the IgG titer and DMTs. All patients in treatment with first-line DMTs, natalizumab, cladribine, and alemtuzumab, developed a measurable humoral response. In patients treated with ocrelizumab and fingolimod, the IgG level was significantly lower, but only some patients (22.2% for fingolimod and 66% for ocrelizumab) failed to develop a measurable humoral response. In the ocrelizumab group, the IgG level was positively correlated with the time from last infusion. No SARS-CoV-2 infections were reported after vaccination. The most reported side effects were pain at the injection site (57.1%) and fatigue (37.9%). No patient experienced severe side effects requiring hospitalization. Our study confirms that COVID-19 vaccination is safe and well-tolerated in MS patients and should be recommended to all patients regardless of their current DMTs. Since fingolimod and ocrelizumab could reduce the humoral immune response, in patients treated with these drugs, detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies could be helpful to monitor the immune response after vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fioravante Capone
- Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, Rome, 00128, Italy.
| | - Matteo Lucchini
- UOC Neurologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, CERSM, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Assunta Bianco
- UOC Neurologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, CERSM, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariagrazia Rossi
- Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, Rome, 00128, Italy
| | - Alessandra Cicia
- UOC Neurologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, CERSM, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Cortese
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre, S. Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cruciani
- Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, Rome, 00128, Italy
| | - Valeria De Arcangelis
- UOC Neurologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura De Giglio
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre, S. Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Motolese
- Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, Rome, 00128, Italy
| | - Biagio Sancetta
- Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, Rome, 00128, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Mirabella
- UOC Neurologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, CERSM, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, Rome, 00128, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nistri R, Barbuti E, Rinaldi V, Tufano L, Pozzilli V, Ianniello A, Marinelli F, De Luca G, Prosperini L, Tomassini V, Pozzilli C. Case Report: Multiple Sclerosis Relapses After Vaccination Against SARS-CoV2: A Series of Clinical Cases. Front Neurol 2021; 12:765954. [PMID: 34744992 PMCID: PMC8569136 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.765954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To describe a temporal association between COVID-19 vaccine administration and multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses. Methods: This case series study was collected in four MS Centres in Central Italy, using data from 16 MS patients who received COVID-19 vaccination and presented both clinically and radiologically confirmed relapses between March and June 2021. We collected patients' relevant medical history, including demographics, MS clinical course, disease-modifying treatment (DMT) received (if applicable), and data from MRI scans obtained after the COVID-19 vaccination. Results: Three out of 16 patients received a diagnosis of MS with a first episode occurring after COVID-19 vaccination; 13 had already a diagnosis of MS and, among them, 9 were on treatment with DMTs. Ten patients received BNT162b2/Pfizer-BioNTech, 2 patients mRNA-1273/Moderna, and 4 patients ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/AstraZeneca. All MS relapses occurred from 3 days to 3 weeks after receiving the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccination or the booster. All patients had evidence of radiological activity on MRI. Discussion: Clinical and radiological findings in these cohort of MS patients confirmed disease re/activation and suggested a temporal association between disease activity and COVID-19 vaccination. The nature of this temporal association, whether causative or incidental, remains to be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Nistri
- Neurology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Barbuti
- Neurology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Virginia Rinaldi
- Neurology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Tufano
- Neurology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria Pozzilli
- Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies (ITAB), Department of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.,MS Centre, Department of Clinical Neurology, SS. Annunziata University Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Fabiana Marinelli
- MS Centre, Department of Neurology, Fabrizio Spaziani Hospital, Frosinone, Italy
| | - Giovanna De Luca
- MS Centre, Department of Clinical Neurology, SS. Annunziata University Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | - Luca Prosperini
- MS Centre, Department of Neurosciences, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Tomassini
- Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies (ITAB), Department of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.,MS Centre, Department of Clinical Neurology, SS. Annunziata University Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | - Carlo Pozzilli
- Neurology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.,MS Centre, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Reuken PA, Albers S, Rauchfuss F, Strnad P, Settmacher U, Trautwein C, Stallmach A, Bruns T. Acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines by liver transplant recipients and candidates. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2021; 59:1288-1296. [PMID: 34670294 DOI: 10.1055/a-1649-8568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Guidelines recommend vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in transplant recipients, candidates, and their household contacts. However, little is known about the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines in these groups.In March 2021, we surveyed 826 liver transplant recipients, candidates, and their household contacts to determine acceptance rates and factors influencing the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine; 341 patients (40%) and 237 household contacts (28%) returned the questionnaire. Ninety percent of patients returning the survey reported they were willing to receive the vaccine within the next 6 months or had already started vaccination. Only 2% of patients and 4% of household contacts reported refusing the vaccine, and 8% of patients and 9% of household contacts wanted to postpone vaccination because of concerns about side effects. Having received the influenza vaccine in the last 2 seasons was the strongest indicator of acceptance to receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine within 6 months (odds ratio 5.11; 95% confidence interval 2.43-10.74; p < 0.001). Thirty-two percent of responding patients reported fear of side effects as a reason for having refused vaccination before.Although the acceptance of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was particularly high among German liver transplant recipients, candidates, and household contacts in this survey, transplant physicians are encouraged to discuss safety concerns with patients who have refused the seasonal influenza vaccine in the past.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp A Reuken
- Klinik für Innere Medizin IV, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Stefanie Albers
- Medizinische Klinik III, Universitätsklinikum Aachen (RWTH), Aachen, Germany
| | - Falk Rauchfuss
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Pavel Strnad
- Medizinische Klinik III, Universitätsklinikum Aachen (RWTH), Aachen, Germany
| | - Utz Settmacher
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Christian Trautwein
- Medizinische Klinik III, Universitätsklinikum Aachen (RWTH), Aachen, Germany
| | - Andreas Stallmach
- Klinik für Innere Medizin IV, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Tony Bruns
- Medizinische Klinik III, Universitätsklinikum Aachen (RWTH), Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cascini F, Pantovic A, Al-Ajlouni Y, Failla G, Ricciardi W. Attitudes, acceptance and hesitancy among the general population worldwide to receive the COVID-19 vaccines and their contributing factors: A systematic review. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 40:101113. [PMID: 34490416 PMCID: PMC8411034 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 206] [Impact Index Per Article: 68.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High rates of vaccination worldwide are required to establish a herd immunity and stop the current COVID-19 pandemic evolution. Vaccine hesitancy is a major barrier in achieving herd immunity across different populations. This study sought to conduct a systematic review of the current literature regarding attitudes and hesitancy to receiving COVID-19 vaccination worldwide. METHODS A systematic literature search of PubMed and Web of Science was performed on July 5th, 2021, using developed keywords. Inclusion criteria required the study to (1) be conducted in English; (2) investigate attitudes, hesitancy, and/or barriers to COVID-19 vaccine acceptability among a given population; (3) utilize validated measurement techniques; (4) have the full text paper available and be peer-reviewed prior to final publication. FINDINGS Following PRISMA guidelines, 209 studies were included. The Newcastle Ottawa (NOS) scale for cross-sectional studies was used to assess the quality of the studies.Overall, vaccine acceptance rates ranged considerably between countries and between different time points, with Arabian countries showing the highest hesitancy rates compared with other parts of the world. INTERPRETATION A variety of different factors contributed to increased hesitancy, including having negative perception of vaccine efficacy, safety, convenience, and price. Some of the consistent socio-demographic groups that were identified to be associated with increased hesitancy included: women, younger participants, and people who were less educated, had lower income, had no insurance, living in a rural area, and self-identified as a racial/ethnic minority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fidelia Cascini
- Section of Hygiene, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy
| | - Ana Pantovic
- Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Yazan Al-Ajlouni
- New York Medical College School of Medicine, Valhalla, New York, United States
| | - Giovanna Failla
- Department of Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Ricciardi
- Section of Hygiene, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Yap SM, Al Hinai M, Gaughan M, Callanan I, Kearney H, Tubridy N, McGuigan C. Vaccine hesitancy among people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2021; 56:103236. [PMID: 34507240 PMCID: PMC8411656 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Background The current severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has raised awareness of vaccine hesitancy. Specific reasons for vaccine hesitancy among people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) have not been fully described. Notably, pwMS may experience higher morbidity from vaccine-preventable diseases such as influenza, pneumococcal disease, and human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated warts and malignancies. Furthermore, screening for immunity against measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) is not standard practice, despite a resurgence of measles and mumps outbreaks in Europe and worldwide. We aimed to evaluate general vaccination status among pwMS to better inform vaccine practices in this cohort. Methods This was a prospective audit of pwMS attending an Irish tertiary referral MS centre. We designed a questionnaire that explored awareness, uptake, and hesitancy for the influenza, pneumococcal, SARS-CoV-2, HPV, and MMR vaccines. The clinician administered the questionnaire during the outpatient MS clinic. Results One-hundred-and-five pwMS participated in the audit, mean (SD) age 47.3 (12.8) years, mean MS disease duration 14.1 (9.5) years, median Expanded Disability Severity Scale (EDSS) score 2.0 (IQR 1.0-6.0), forty-nine (46.7%) were taking either maintenance immunosuppressive or immune reconstitution therapies. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine willingness among pwMS was higher (90.5 vs 60-80%) than that reported in other Western countries, and higher than that for the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines (∼80%) for which perceived unnecessity and unfamiliarity respectively were the main limiting factors. The primary reason for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy was safety concern. PwMS who were explicitly advised by a healthcare professional to obtain the influenza vaccine were more likely to do so than those who were not (odds ratio, 8.1, 95% CI 2.8 – 23.4, p<0.001). Of pwMS currently receiving B-cell therapy (ocrelizumab/rituximab, n=12), all but one (n=11, 91.7%) have never received the pneumococcal vaccine, and a quarter (n=3) were uncertain whether to obtain this in the future. Patient-reported uptake of HPV (1.0%) and MMR (51.4%) vaccines were suboptimal. Prevalence of vaccine promotion among healthcare professionals was low (influenza vaccine, 4.8 – 32.4%; pneumococcal vaccine, 0 – 18.1%). Conclusions Vaccine hesitancy is common (10-20%) in pwMS, consequent to insufficient knowledge and misconceptions about vaccination among pwMS and suboptimal vaccine promotion by healthcare professionals who manage pwMS. Conscientious and context-specific vaccination counselling is necessary to tackle vaccine hesitancy among pwMS, including (i) avoiding infection-associated disability accrual during MS relapses, (ii) reducing the potentially higher risk of life-threatening/treatment-refractory complications that may be observed in those who develop vaccine-preventable infections while receiving certain DMTs, and (iii) avoiding attenuated vaccine responses or delayed/interrupted DMT with early pre-treatment vaccine delivery where possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siew Mei Yap
- Department of Neurology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland; School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
| | - Mahmood Al Hinai
- Department of Neurology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Maria Gaughan
- Department of Neurology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland; School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Ian Callanan
- Department of Clinical Audit, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Hugh Kearney
- Department of Neurology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Niall Tubridy
- Department of Neurology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland; School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Christopher McGuigan
- Department of Neurology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland; School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Al-Hanawi MK, Ahmad K, Haque R, Keramat SA. Willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccination among adults with chronic diseases in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health 2021; 14:1489-1496. [PMID: 34417135 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with chronic conditions such as cancer, kidney disease, lung disease, diabetes, dementia, obesity, and heart conditions are at elevated risk of developing severe complications, and are thus at greater risk of death due to COVID-19. The COVID-19 vaccine is an effective measure to manage the pandemic as it prevents severe illness and death. Nevertheless, many people are hesitant to receive the COVID-19 vaccine due to fear of its side effects. The aim of this study was to identify the risk and protective factors of accepting COVID-19 vaccination among Saudi Arabian people with chronic diseases. METHODS This study extracted data from an online cross-sectional self-reported questionnaire conducted on the acceptability of a COVID-19 vaccine in Saudi Arabia in December 2020. The study included a sample of 521 adults who self-reported that they had chronic diseases. Multivariable regression analyses were employed to identify the factors associated with accepting COVID-19 vaccination in Saudi Arabia. The estimates were adjusted for confounding variables, including socio-demographic factors. RESULTS Among the sampled participants of Saudi adults with chronic diseases, approximately 52% indicated that they were willing to accept the COVID-19 vaccine. Participants had higher willingness to accept the vaccine if they received the seasonal influenza vaccination in the past [odds ratio (OR): 2.179; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.222-3.888], reported high or very high levels of concern about contracting COVID-19 (OR: 2.426; 95% CI: 1.209-4.867), or believed in mandatory COVID-19 vaccination (OR: 84.848; 95% CI: 37.651-191.207). Participants had lower willingness to be vaccinated if they had a history of vaccine refusal (OR: 0.211; 95% CI: 0.088-0.504). Among the socio-demographic factors, being male (OR: 2.153; 95% CI: 1.007-4.603), having a postgraduate degree (OR: 2.408; 95% CI: 0.985-5.886), and being unemployed (OR: 2.780; 95% CI: 0.876-8.827) were associated with an increased willingness of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study demonstrate that willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccination among Saudi Arabian adults with chronic conditions is low. Therefore, further policy measures are required to manage COVID-19-related infections and the death toll.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed K Al-Hanawi
- Department of Health Services and Hospital Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administration, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Health Economics Research Group, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Kabir Ahmad
- School of Business, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.
| | - Rezwanul Haque
- American International University-Bangladesh (AIUB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
| | - Syed A Keramat
- School of Business, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia; Economics Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna, Bangladesh.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hesitant or Not Hesitant? A Systematic Review on Global COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance in Different Populations. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:vaccines9080873. [PMID: 34452000 PMCID: PMC8402447 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9080873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccination currently appears to be the only strategy to contain the spread of COVID-19. At the same time, vaccine hesitancy (VH) could limit its efficacy and has, therefore, attracted the attention of Public Health Systems. This systematic review aimed at assessing anti-COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rates worldwide and at identifying populations more prone to vaccine hesitancy, for which specific interventions should be planned. PubMed database was searched using a purposely formulated string. One hundred out of the 9243 studies retrieved were considered pertinent and thus included in the analyses. VH rate was analyzed according to patient geographical origin, ethnicity, age, study setting, and method used for data collection; data from specific populations were separately analyzed. Overall, this study demonstrated significant differences in terms of VH in the general population and in the specific subgroups examined according to geographical, demographic factors, as well as associated comorbidities, underlining the need for purposely designed studies in specific populations from the different countries, to design targeted programs aimed at increasing awareness for confidence and complacency toward COVID-19 vaccines.
Collapse
|
32
|
Uhr L, Mateen FJ. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in multiple sclerosis: A cross-sectional survey. Mult Scler 2021; 28:1072-1080. [PMID: 34313513 DOI: 10.1177/13524585211030647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccine willingness among people living with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) requires assessment following the approval of the first COVID-19 vaccines, since there remains uncertainty on multiple aspects of COVID-19 vaccination in immunosuppressed patients. OBJECTIVE To understand COVID-19 and influenza vaccine willingness and its associations among PwMS, following the approval of the first two mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS A survey was distributed to PwMS via an online platform from December 2020 to February 2021. Logistic regression models were constructed to determine the relationship between (1) COVID-19 and (2) influenza vaccination willingness with demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS Of 701 responding PwMS, 76.6% were COVID-19 vaccine willing. COVID-19 vaccine willingness was significantly associated with influenza vaccine willingness (p < 0.001). In multivariable models, older age increased the odds of COVID-19 and influenza vaccine willingness (odds ratios (ORs) > 1) and other race decreased the odds of COVID-19 and influenza vaccine willingness (ORs < 1); higher functional disability decreased the odds of COVID-19 vaccine willingness (OR = 0.88, 95% confidence interval = 0.80-0.96). Prevalent vaccine-related concerns include safety (n = 244) and efficacy (n = 122). CONCLUSION Our findings identify demographic and clinical factors as well as concerns influencing vaccine hesitancy in PwMS. These results may inform effective public health interventions to improve vaccine acceptability in this at-risk group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Uhr
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Farrah J Mateen
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine in people with multiple sclerosis - UK MS Register survey. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2021; 55:103175. [PMID: 34343866 PMCID: PMC8313796 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Background & Methods: We conducted an online COVID-19 survey as the vaccines became available, utilising the UK MS Register, to understand people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) views on COVID-19 vaccination and the subsequent vaccine uptake rates. Results & Conclusion: 94.4% of 3191 pwMS surveyed indicated they would get a COVID-19 vaccine, while 5.6% would not. PwMS who have previously had an influenza vaccine, increasing age and the perception of having sufficient information about the vaccine were associated with increased likelihood of getting a vaccine. 51.7% of 3191 pwMS completed a follow-up survey indicating they received at least 1 dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. The proportion having had the vaccination based on their prior opinions was 53.2% in ‘Yes’ group and 27.0% in ‘No’ group, the latter reflecting a change based on their initial views. More information on COVID-19 vaccine safety in pwMS would be helpful for people to make informed decisions.
Collapse
|
34
|
Ehde DM, Roberts MK, Humbert AT, Herring TE, Alschuler KN. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in adults with multiple sclerosis in the United States: A follow up survey during the initial vaccine rollout in 2021. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2021; 54:103163. [PMID: 34325399 PMCID: PMC8295053 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) organizations have recommended that adults with MS obtain the COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccine hesitancy is a barrier to full COVID-19 inoculation in the general population. Whether vaccine hesitancy is also a barrier towards optimizing vaccination rates in the MS community is unknown. To investigate vaccine hesitancy and inform efforts to increase vaccine uptake in the MS population, we conducted a follow up survey of a national sample of adults with MS living in the United States who completed an initial survey early in the COVID-19 pandemic. The current study aimed to answer questions vital to understanding vaccine hesitancy, specifically: (1) What is the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in early 2021? (2) What are the reasons for and factors associated with current hesitancy? (3) How has vaccine willingness and hesitancy changed from April/May 2020 to January/February 2021? and (4) Who has changed in their vaccine willingness? Methods Adults with MS living in the United States (N = 359) completed two online surveys (the first between 10 April 2020 and 06 May 2020; the second between 11 January 2021 and 08 February 2021) about their willingness and intent to obtain a COVID-19 vaccine. Participants also completed measures to assess factors potentially related to vaccine hesitancy, including demographics, MS variables, influenza vaccine history, vaccine concerns, and contextual factors, including perceived risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection, trust in COVID-19 information source, anxiety, and loneliness. Results Of the participants who completed the second survey in early 2021, 20.3% were vaccine hesitant, that is, either reporting that they were undecided (13.9%) or not intending to get vaccinated (6.4%). Vaccine hesitancy decreased between the two surveys, with nearly three-fourths (73.8%) of the second sample reporting that they planned to obtain the COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccine hesitancy was associated with having a lower level of education, being non-White, not having a recent flu vaccination, holding a lower perception of one's risk of getting COVID-19, and having lower trust in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Participants who were vaccine hesitant reported concerns about the long-term effects of the vaccine, the vaccine approval process, and the potential impact of the vaccine given their own health conditions/history. Notably, 90% of the undecided group wanted additional information about the vaccine before deciding. Vaccine willingness changed over time, with many of those who were somewhat willing more willing to get the COVID-19 vaccine at survey 2. Individuals who were unwilling at survey 1 were highly likely to remain unwilling at survey 2. Conclusion Overall, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy decreased during the pandemic, although one in five adults with MS were hesitant in early 2021. Of those who were undecided, most indicated that they wanted additional information about the vaccine before deciding whether to be vaccinated, suggesting additional educational efforts on the vaccine's safety, long-term effects, and potential health implications are still needed. Findings indicate that public health efforts may be best focused on those who are undecided, whose vaccine hesitancy may change over time and, possibly, with appropriate information or intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn M Ehde
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
| | - Michelle K Roberts
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Andrew T Humbert
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Tracy E Herring
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Kevin N Alschuler
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cabreira V, Abreu P, Soares-dos-Reis R, Guimarães J, Sá MJ. Multiple Sclerosis, Disease-Modifying Therapies and COVID-19: A Systematic Review on Immune Response and Vaccination Recommendations. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:773. [PMID: 34358189 PMCID: PMC8310076 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9070773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding the risks of COVID-19 in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) receiving disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and their immune reactions is vital to analyze vaccine response dynamics. A systematic review on COVID-19 course and outcomes in patients receiving different DMTs was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Emerging data on SARS-CoV-2 vaccines was used to elaborate recommendations. Data from 4417 patients suggest that MS per se do not portend a higher risk of severe COVID-19. As for the general population, advanced age, comorbidities, and higher disability significantly impact COVID-19 outcomes. Most DMTs have a negligible influence on COVID-19 incidence and outcome, while for those causing severe lymphopenia and hypogammaglobulinemia, such as anti-CD20 therapies, there might be a tendency of increased hospitalization, worse outcomes and a higher risk of re-infection. Blunted immune responses have been reported for many DMTs, with vaccination implications. Clinical evidence does not support an increased risk of MS relapse or vaccination failure, but vaccination timing needs to be individually tailored. For cladribine and alemtuzumab, it is recommended to wait 3-6 months after the last cycle until vaccination. For the general anti-CD20 therapies, vaccination must be deferred toward the end of the cycle and the next dose administered at least 4-6 weeks after completing vaccination. Serological status after vaccination is highly encouraged. Growing clinical evidence and continuous surveillance are extremely important to continue guiding future treatment strategies and vaccination protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verónica Cabreira
- Serviço de Neurologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal; (P.A.); (R.S.-d.-R.); (J.G.); (M.J.S.)
- Departamento de Neurociências Clínicas e Saúde Mental, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Abreu
- Serviço de Neurologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal; (P.A.); (R.S.-d.-R.); (J.G.); (M.J.S.)
- Departamento de Neurociências Clínicas e Saúde Mental, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Ricardo Soares-dos-Reis
- Serviço de Neurologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal; (P.A.); (R.S.-d.-R.); (J.G.); (M.J.S.)
- Departamento de Neurociências Clínicas e Saúde Mental, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação da Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Joana Guimarães
- Serviço de Neurologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal; (P.A.); (R.S.-d.-R.); (J.G.); (M.J.S.)
- Departamento de Neurociências Clínicas e Saúde Mental, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Maria José Sá
- Serviço de Neurologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal; (P.A.); (R.S.-d.-R.); (J.G.); (M.J.S.)
- Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Rutovic S, Volevach E, Maršálková H, Fumagalli AI, Corea F. What the Aftermath of the Global Pandemic Will Mean for Neurologists. Neurol Int 2021; 13:297-303. [PMID: 34287348 PMCID: PMC8293413 DOI: 10.3390/neurolint13030030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stela Rutovic
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Dubrava, Avenija Gojka Suska 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
- Correspondence:
| | - Ekaterina Volevach
- International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne’s University Hospital, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic; (E.V.); (H.M.)
| | - Hana Maršálková
- International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne’s University Hospital, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic; (E.V.); (H.M.)
| | | | - Francesco Corea
- Stroke and Neurology Unit, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, 06034 Foligno, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Monocentric Observational Study. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11070890. [PMID: 34356125 PMCID: PMC8301852 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11070890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. The so-called “vaccine hesitancy” still represents a common phenomenon that undermines the effectiveness of vaccination campaigns. In 2020, the Italian Medicines Agency recommended to bring forward the flu vaccination campaign, whose importance was also emphasized for patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). We aimed to assess vaccination behavior in patients with MS to prepare for the upcoming SARS-CoV-2 vaccination challenge. Methods. This is an observational study carried out in one MS clinical Centre that enrolled all MS patients who were eligible for any of the flu vaccines recommended by the Italian medicines Agency. Results. 194 patients were enrolled. Patients’ mean age was 43.9 years and 66% were female. Comorbidities, mainly represented by non-autoimmune diseases, were identified in 52% of patients. Almost all patients were receiving a DMT during the study period, mainly dimethyl fumarate, natalizumab, teriflunomide, and interferon. Out of 194 patients, 58.2% accepted to be vaccinated. No statistically significant differences were found, except for the use of natalizumab, which was higher among vaccinated patients. Conclusion. The results of our study emphasize the importance of education and communication campaigns addressed both to healthcare providers and patients with MS, especially considering that MS patients are currently receiving COVID-19 vaccinations.
Collapse
|
38
|
Opinions, beliefs and knowledge of people with multiple sclerosis on COVID-19 pandemic and vaccine. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2021; 54:103113. [PMID: 34216996 PMCID: PMC8234267 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 06/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Considering the potential COVID-19 impact on pwMS health and the importance of vaccination for this population, we decided to assess: (a) pwMS’ beliefs and knowledge on COVID-19 pandemic; (b) their acceptance towards COVID-19 vaccination and (c) pwMS’ opinions on general vaccination. METHODS Observational study, based on a cross-sectional (10-20th September 2020) online survey, conducted in a cohort of pwMS’ followed at two Portuguese hospitals. The survey included measures to characterize the sample and a questionnaire designed to assess the topics defined for this study. RESULTS 270 respondents completed the full survey (response rate 58.2%). pwMS greatest concern during the pandemic was an aggravation of MS, especially by patients older than 50 years old. Almost 40% of the patients older than 50 felt that the pandemic negatively affected their MS related medical assistance. Most patients believed they would recover from COVID-19 infection. More than half of the responders feared a MS aggravation if they got COVID-19; this was more pronounced in patients with progressive MS. About 12% of the participants did not want to be vaccinated and almost 40% was unsure. Regarding vaccines in general, almost a third of the participants feared their side effects or MS related complications. CONCLUSION Having knowledge of pwMS’ opinions on COVID-19 pandemic impact and vaccination is useful to better address these issues. Fears and expectations towards vaccination must be discussed with pwMS.
Collapse
|