Racial and ethnic disparities in treatment response and tolerability in multiple sclerosis: A comparative study

Efficacy of Ofatumumab and Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing MS From Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups: ASCLEPIOS I/II Subgroup Analyses

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Race and ethnicity may influence the efficacy of disease-modifying therapies in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Incidence of MS in ethnically diverse groups may be higher; however, these populations are under-represented in MS trials. This post hoc analysis compared the proportion of patients achieving 3-parameter no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) with ofatumumab vs teriflunomide in participants with relapsing MS (RMS) enrolled in the ASCLEPIOS I/II trials by race/ethnicity subgroup.

METHODS

ASCLEPIOS I/II were identical, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 trials. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive ofatumumab 20 mg every 4 weeks or teriflunomide 14 mg once daily for up to 30 months. Pooled data were used to determine the efficacy/safety of ofatumumab vs teriflunomide in participants who self-identified as non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, Hispanic/Latino, or non-Hispanic White. Participants who did not self-identify into one of these groups were classified as other/unknown.

RESULTS

Of the 1,882 participants, 64 (3.4%) self-identified as non-Hispanic Black, 71 (3.8%) as non-Hispanic Asian, 145 (7.7%) as Hispanic/Latino, and 1,538 (81.7%) as non-Hispanic White. Baseline participant demographics/characteristics were largely balanced across subgroups, aside from minor variations in sex, disease duration, and MRI lesions. From months 0 to 24, the proportion of ofatumumab vs teriflunomide-treated patients achieving NEDA-3 (odds ratio [95% CI]) was as follows: non-Hispanic Black, 33.3% vs 3.4% (15.9 [1.67-151.71; p = 0.0162]); non-Hispanic Asian, 42.9% vs 21.9% (3.18 [0.95-10.59; p = 0.06]); Hispanic/Latino, 36.6% vs 18.6% (3.21 [1.32-7.79; p = 0.01]); and non-Hispanic White, 37.4% vs 16.6% (3.57 [2.73-4.67; p < 0.0001]). Rates of AEs were generally similar between treatment groups and across race/ethnicity subgroups; no new or unexpected safety signals were identified.

DISCUSSION

Ofatumumab was associated with greater proportions of NEDA-3 achievement than teriflunomide across race/ethnicity subgroups in the ASCLEPIOS trials. Within each treatment group, the proportion of patients achieving NEDA-3 from months 0 to 24 was similar across the subgroups and overall pooled population. Both ofatumumab and teriflunomide were well tolerated. Future MS trials should include ethnically diverse groups to better inform treatment decisions and improve real-world patient outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02792218 (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02792218), NCT02792231 (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02792231). Submission date: June 2, 2016. First enrollment: August 26, 2016.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that among patients aged 18-55 years with RMS, the improvement in NEDA-3 with ofatumumab was comparably better than with teriflunomide among patients self-identified as non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic/Latino, and other/unknown.

Race and ethnicity in multiple sclerosis phase 3 clinical trials: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Distinctive differences in multiple sclerosis (MS) have been observed by race and ethnicity. We aim to (1) assess how often race and ethnicity were reported in clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, (2) evaluate whether the population was diverse enough, and (3) compare with publications.

METHODS

We included phase 3 clinical trials registered with results on ClinicalTrials.gov between 2007 and 2023. When race and/or ethnicity were reported, we searched for the corresponding publications.

RESULTS

Out of the 99 included studies, 56% reported race and/or ethnicity, of which only 26% of those primarily completed before 2017. Studies reporting race or ethnicity contributed to a total of 33,891 participants, mainly enrolled in Eastern Europe. Most were White (93%), and the median percentage of White participants was 93% (interquartile range (IQR) = 86%-98%), compared to 3% for Black (IQR = 1%-12%) and 0.2% for Asian (IQR = 0%-1%). Four trials omitted race and ethnicity in publications and even when information was reported, some discrepancies in terminology were identified and categories with fewer participants were often collapsed.

CONCLUSION

More efforts should be done to improve transparency, accuracy, and representativeness, in publications and at a design phase, by addressing social determinants of health that historically limit the enrollment of underrepresented population.

Early use of high-efficacy therapies in multiple sclerosis in the United States: benefits, barriers, and strategies for encouraging adoption

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by progressive neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration from disease onset that, if left untreated, can result in the accumulation of irreversible neurological disability. Early intervention with high-efficacy therapies (HETs) is increasingly recognized as the best strategy to delay or mitigate disease progression from the earliest stages of the disease and to prevent long-term neurodegeneration. Although there is growing clinical and real-world evidence supporting early HET intervention, foregoing this strategy in favor of a traditional escalation approach prioritizing lower-efficacy disease-modifying therapies remains a common approach in clinical practice. This review explores potential health care professional- and patient-related barriers to the early use of HETs in patients with MS in the United States. Barriers can include regulatory and reimbursement restrictions; knowledge gaps and long-term safety concerns among health care professionals; and various individual, cultural, and societal factors affecting patients. Potential strategies for overcoming these barriers and encouraging early HET use are proposed.

A national registry-based study of ethnic differences in people with multiple sclerosis in Iran

OBJECTIVE

The relationship between MS and ethnicity has been understudied in the Middle East compared to the United States and Europe. As Iran as the highest prevalence of MS in the Middle East, we decided to investigate the demographic and clinical differences in people with MS (pwMS) from major ethnicities Iran.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study using data from National Multiple Sclerosis Registry in Iran. PwMS from six provinces were chosen and interviewed for determining their ethnicity. Persians (Fars), Kurds, Lurs, Azeris and Arabs with a clear ethnic background were included. Recorded data from the registry was used to compare the demographic and clinical features.

RESULTS

A total of 4015 pwMS (74.2% female) were included in the study with an average age of 36.76 ± 9.68 years. Persians and Kurds had the highest percentage of pwMS in youngest and oldest age groups, respectively, with 2.9% and 5.7% (p<0.01). The highest average age of onset was seen in Persians (29.47 ± 8.89) and the lowest observed in Mazandaranis (26.82 ± 7.68, p<0.01). Azeris and Kurds had the highest proportions of pwMS diagnosed <18 and >55, at rates of 12% and 1.6%, respectively (p<0.01). There were statistically significant differences in distribution of phenotypes (p<0.01) and time to progression to secondary progressive MS (p<0.01) such that Persians had the highest rate of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) at 19.3% and Arabs had highest rates of relapsing-remitting MS (86.2%) and secondary progressive MS (16.4%). Lurs, Azeris and Mazandaranis had significantly more patients progressing to secondary-progressive MS <5 years from diagnosis (p<0.01). There was a significant difference in number of relapses between the ethnicities (p<0.01) with Lurs having the highest proportion of participants reporting >4 relapses with 23.0% and Azeris having the highest percentage of pwMS reporting no relapse (53.0%). Kurds had the highest Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) average at 2.93 ± 1.99 and Lurs had the lowest with 1.28 ± 1.25 (p<0.01). The differences in prevalence of positive family history for the whole cohort between ethnicities were significant (P=0.02), ranging from 12.8% in Kurds to 19.6% in Persians.

CONCLUSION

We found Persians to have higher rates of pediatric MS and higher rates of CIS. Kurds and Lurs had higher and lower EDSS scores, respectively. Lurs and Persian had higher annual relapse rates. We also found lower rates of SPMS among Arabs and earlier progression to SPMS in Lurs, Azeris and Mazandaranis. Such differences highlight the importance of the potential role of ethnicities in diagnosis and prognosis of MS, especially considering their observation within the geographical limits of a single country.

Disparities by Race in Pregnancy Care and Clinical Outcomes in Women With Multiple Sclerosis: A Diverse Multicenter Cohort

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Racial disparities exist in both neurologic and obstetric populations, underscoring the importance of evaluating pregnancy outcomes in diverse women with multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of this multicenter retrospective study was to compare pregnancy care and outcomes between Black and Hispanic (underrepresented) and White women with MS.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical data were extracted from medical records of 9 US MS centers for women with MS/clinically isolated syndrome who delivered live births between 2010 and 2021. Sites identified at last 15 consecutive Black/Hispanic women and a matching number of White women. Socioeconomic factors, pregnancy, and MS care/outcomes were compared between groups (underrepresented and White and then Black and Hispanic) using Wilcoxon rank sum (U statistic and effect size r reported), χ2, t tests and logistic regressions as appropriate to data type. Multiple imputation by chained equation was used to account for missing data.

RESULTS

Overall, 294 pregnancies resulting in live births were analyzed ( 81 Black, 67 Hispanic, and 146 White mothers). Relative to underrepresented women, White women lived in areas of higher median (interquartile range [IQR]) Child Opportunity Index (79 [45.8] vs 22 [45.8], U = 3,824, r = 0.56, p < 0.0001) and were more often employed (84.9% vs 75%, odds ratio [OR] 2.57, CI 1.46-4.50, p = 0.0008) and privately insured (93.8% vs 56.8%, OR 11.6, CI 5.5-24.5, p < 0.0001) and more received a 14-week ultrasound (98.6% vs 93.9%, OR 4.66, CI 0.99-21.96, p = 0.027). Mode of delivery was significantly different between the three groups (X2(10,294) = 20.38, p = 0.03); notably, Black women had the highest rates of emergency cesarean deliveries, and Hispanic women highest rates of uncomplicated vaginal deliveries. Babies born to underrepresented women had lower median (IQR) birthweights than babies born to White women (3,198 g [435.3 g] vs 3,275 g [412.5 g], U = 9,255, r = 0.12, p = 0.04) and shorter median (IQR) breastfeeding duration (4.5 [3.3] vs 6.0 [4.2] months, U = 8,184, r = 0.21, p = 0.003). While underrepresented women were younger than White women (mean [SD] 30.9 [4.8] vs 33.8 [4.0], t = 1.97, CI 1.96-3.98, p < 0.0001), their median (Q1-Q3, IQR) Expanded Disability Status Scale was higher (1.5 [1-2.5, 1.5] vs 1 [0-1.5, 1.5], U = 7,260, r = 0.29, p < 0.0001) before pregnancy. Finally, medical records were missing more key data for Black women (19.7% missing vs 8.9% missing, OR 2.54, CI 1.25-5.06, p = 0.008).

DISCUSSION

In this geographically diverse multicenter cohort, underrepresented women entered pregnancy with higher disability and fewer health care resources. Pregnancy represents a pivotal window where structural factors affect maternal and fetal health and neurologic trajectories; it is a critical period to optimize care and health outcomes.

Randomized Controlled Trial of the Behavioral Intervention for Physical Activity in Multiple Sclerosis Project: Response Heterogeneity and Predictors of Change

BACKGROUND

We reported that a social cognitive theory-based (SCT), Internet-delivered behavioral intervention increased device-measured minutes/day of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) over a 6-month period among persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). This paper examined the pattern and predictors of heterogeneity in change for MVPA. Based on previous research, we hypothesized that mild MS disability, fewer MS symptoms, lower baseline MVPA, and positive SCT characteristics (e.g., high exercise self-efficacy) would be associated with greater change in MVPA.

METHOD

Persons with MS (N = 318) were randomized into behavioral intervention (n = 159) or attention/social contact control (n = 159) conditions that were administered via Internet websites and supported with behavioral coaching. Demographic, clinical, symptom, behavioral, and SCT data were from before the 6-month period of delivering the conditions, and MVPA data were from before and after the 6-month period. We examined heterogeneity based on waterfall plots, box plots, and the Levene statistic. We identified predictors of MVPA change using bivariate correlation and multiple, linear regression analyses per condition.

RESULTS

The Levene statistic indicated statistically significant heterogeneity of variances for MVPA change between conditions (p = .003), and the waterfall plots and box plots indicated greater heterogeneity in MVPA change for the behavioral intervention. MVPA change score was correlated with baseline MVPA (r =  - .33 and r =  - .34, p = .0004 and p = .0001) in both conditions and walking impairment (r =  - .188, p = .047) and race (r = .233, p = .014) in the behavioral intervention condition. The regression analysis indicated that baseline MVPA (Standardized B =  - .449, p = .000002), self-reported walking impairment (Standardized B =  - .310, p = .0008), and race (Standardized B = .215, p = .012) explained 25.6% of variance in MVPA change for the behavioral intervention condition.

CONCLUSION

We provide evidence for walking impairment, baseline MVPA, and race as predictors of the heterogeneity in the pattern of MVPA change with a behavioral intervention.

Podcast on Identifying and Understanding Barriers to Care in Underserved Populations With MS in the United States

Multiple sclerosis (MS) can affect people from all racial and ethnic backgrounds, but, historically, the incidence of MS in the United States was thought to be highest in White individuals. More recent data suggest that the incidence of MS in Black or African American individuals is comparable to that in White individuals. In Hispanic or Latino individuals, incidence of MS is lower, but age of onset may be earlier compared with White individuals. Additionally, there are important differences in MS disease severity, disease progression, and mortality in Black or African American and Hispanic or Latino populations. Compared with their White counterparts, individuals from these underrepresented groups are more likely to be affected by MS in specific areas of the nervous system, such as accelerated loss of retinal and brain tissue in Black or African American individuals and optic neuritis in Hispanic individuals. Additionally, Black or African American individuals with MS tend to have an aggressive disease course, earlier disability, and higher risk of requiring ambulatory assistance. Although these differences may be attributed to genetic factors, systemic racism and biases and barriers to accessing care may perpetuate health disparities. Moreover, non-White communities remain broadly underrepresented in clinical trials; however, it is vital that these populations are appropriately represented so that any potential differences in drug efficacy or safety implications are detected. Thus, it is important to increase awareness of MS in these populations. In this podcast, the authors discuss characteristics of MS in Black or African American and Hispanic or Latino populations, identify barriers to care, and propose solutions to improve access to MS care in these populations. MP4 (358385 KB).

Multiple Sclerosis in Black and Hispanic Populations: Serving the Underserved

Multiple sclerosis has historically been characterized as a disease that affects young women of European ancestry, but recent studies indicate that the incidence and prevalence of the disease is much higher in Black and Hispanic populations than previously recognized. There is evidence that there is a more severe disease course in these populations. , but the intersection of genetic underpinnings and social determinants of health (SDOH) is poorly understood due to the lack of diversity in clinical research. Improving health disparities will involve multiple stakeholders in efforts to improve SDOH and raise awareness about research involvement and the importance of developing personalized health care plans to combat this disease.

Leveraging Real-World Evidence and Observational Studies in Treating Multiple Sclerosis

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are essential for regulatory approval of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), yet their strict selection criteria often lead to limited generalizability. Observational studies using real-world data (RWD) allow for more inclusive heterogeneous cohorts resulting in higher external validity to inform treatment practices. As reviewed in this article, well-designed comparative effectiveness studies are an important application of RWD. Although, like RCTs, observational studies have their own set of limitations, including various biases that may confound results, advanced statistical methods can mitigate many of these limitations. A focus on personalized treatment will continue to add value to individualize MS care.

Ethnic disparities in the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a neuroinflammatory disorder which affects 2.8 million people world-wide. A growing body of evidence shows ethnic disparities in MS. This review aims to evaluate differences, based upon ethnic background, in the incidence, prevalence, disease course, and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) among people with MS (PwMS).

METHOD

Ethnicities were classified as White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Middle Eastern and North African (MENA). A literature search was conducted using the PubMed search engine to identify articles on MS and ethnicity that were published in the English language between 01/01/2005 and 31/05/2022.

RESULTS

101 studies met all inclusion criteria. Although the incidence and prevalence of MS varied among ethnicities, findings were inconsistent and depended on the continent of the study. Ethnicity may have an impact on the disease course. PwMS from Black, Hispanic, and MENA, but not Asian ethnicities, appeared to accumulate physical disability at a faster rate than those from White ethnicity. Although there was a lack of studies evaluating the relative safety and efficacy of DMTs among various ethnicities, interferon-beta was found to be less efficacious in PwMS from Black ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies, with more uniform definitions of ethnicity are required to comprehensively understand ethnic disparities in MS, in particular to identify underlying causes, to facilitate the delivery of personalised medical care and avoid inequity.

Treatment Patterns by Race and Ethnicity in Newly Diagnosed Persons with Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic persons with MS (pwMS) are more likely to experience rapid disease progression and severe disability than non-Hispanic White pwMS; however, it is unknown how the initiation of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) differs by race/ethnicity. This real-world study describes DMT treatment patterns in newly diagnosed pwMS in the United States (US) overall and by race/ethnicity.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis used the US Optum Market Clarity claims/electronic health records database (January 2015-September 2020). pwMS who were first diagnosed in 2016 or later and initiated any DMT in the two years following diagnosis were included. Continuous enrollment in the claims data for ≥ 12 months before and ≥ 24 months after diagnosis was required. Treatment patterns 2 years after diagnosis were analyzed descriptively overall and by race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

The sample included 682 newly diagnosed and treated pwMS (non-Hispanic Black, n = 99; non-Hispanic White, n = 479; Hispanic, n = 35; other/unknown race/ethnicity, n = 69). The mean time from diagnosis to DMT initiation was 4.9 months in all pwMS. Glatiramer acetate and dimethyl fumarate were the most common first-line DMTs in non-Hispanic Black (28% and 20% respectively) and Hispanic pwMS (31%, 29%); however, glatiramer acetate and ocrelizumab were the most common in non-Hispanic White pwMS (33%, 18%). Use of first-line high-efficacy DMTs was limited across all race/ethnicity subgroups (11-29%), but uptake increased in non-Hispanic Black and White pwMS over the study period.

CONCLUSION

Use of high-efficacy DMTs was low across all race/ethnicity subgroups of newly diagnosed pwMS in the US, including populations at a greater risk of experiencing rapid disease progression and severe disability.

Social determinants of health and disparate disability accumulation in a cohort of Black, Hispanic, and White patients with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Black and Hispanic patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have been shown to accumulate greater multiple sclerosis-associated disability (MSAD) than White patients. Disparities in social determinants of health (SDOH) among these groups have also been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the extent to which associations of race and ethnicity with MSAD may be attributable to differences in SDOH.

METHODS

Retrospective chart analysis of patients at an academic MS center grouped by self-identified Black (n = 95), Hispanic (n = 93), and White (n = 98) race/ethnicity. Individual patient addresses were geocoded and matched with neighborhood-level area deprivation index (ADI) and social vulnerability index (SVI).

RESULTS

Average Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores at last-recorded evaluations of White patients (1.7 ± 2.0) were significantly lower than Black (2.8 ± 2.4, p = 0.001) and Hispanic (2.6 ± 2.6, p = 0.020) patients. Neither Black race nor Hispanic ethnicity was significantly associated with EDSS in multivariable linear regression models that included individual-level SDOH indicators and either ADI or SVI.

CONCLUSION

Black race and Hispanic ethnicity are not significantly associated with EDSS in models that include individual and neighborhood-level SDOH indicators. Further research should elucidate mechanisms by which structural inequities affect MS disease course.

Health Disparities in Multiple Sclerosis among Hispanic and Black Populations in the United States

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an acquired demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Historically, research on MS has focused on White persons with MS. This preponderance of representation has important possible implications for minority populations with MS, from developing effective therapeutic agents to understanding the role of unique constellations of social determinants of health. A growing body of literature involving persons of historically underrepresented races and ethnicities in the field of multiple sclerosis is assembling. Our purpose in this narrative review is to highlight two populations in the United States: Black and Hispanic persons with multiple sclerosis. We will review the current understanding about the patterns of disease presentation, genetic considerations, response to treatment, roles of social determinants of health, and healthcare utilization. In addition, we explore future directions of inquiry as well as practical methods of meeting these challenges.