1
|
Ramtin S, Ngoue M, Ring D, Teunis T. The Central Sensitization Inventory Measures Thoughts and Emotions. J Patient Exp 2024; 11:23743735241273589. [PMID: 39148748 PMCID: PMC11325304 DOI: 10.1177/23743735241273589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/17/2024] Open
Abstract
To determine if the Central Sensitization Inventory questionnaire (CSI) functions as a mental health measure among a cross-section of people seeking musculoskeletal specialty care, we asked: (1) What is the association of CSI total score and item groupings identified in factor analysis with mental health measures? and (2) What is the association between specific CSI items that represent each factor well and specific mental health measures? One hundred and fifty-seven adults seeking specialty care for musculoskeletal symptoms completed the CSI, a measure of catastrophic thinking, and 3 measures of distress (symptoms of health anxiety, general anxiety, and depression). Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify item groupings. Exploratory factor analysis identified 4 item groupings (factors): (1) thoughts and feelings (mental health), accounting for 52% of the variation in the CSI, (2) urinary and visual symptoms (15%) (3) body aches (10%), and (4) jaw pain (8.1%). More than half the variation in both the CSI total score (51%) and the thoughts and feelings factor (57%) were accounted for by variation in measures of catastrophic thinking and distress. Specific items that account for large amounts of the variation in the CSI also had notable correlations with mental health measures. The strong relationship between the CSI and thoughts and emotions suggests that the CSI functions largely as a mental health measure. If the concept of central sensitization is to help people get and stay healthy, it will depend on evidence that central sensitization can be measured and quantified distinct from mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Ramtin
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Marielle Ngoue
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - David Ring
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Teun Teunis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Salbego RS, Conti PCR, Soares FFC, Ferreira DMAO, Herreira-Ferreira M, de Lima-Netto BA, Costa YM, Bonjardim LR. Central sensitization inventory is associated with psychological functioning but not with psychophysical assessment of pain amplification. Eur J Pain 2024. [PMID: 39120067 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The central sensitization inventory (CSI) is a questionnaire that has been widely used as a tool for assessing symptoms associated with sensitization. However, its ability to identify individuals with this phenomenon has recently been questioned. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation of CSI with psychosocial and psychophysical factors in patients with painful TMD diagnosed according to diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) and asymptomatic controls, as well as to determine the influence of these variables on the CSI scores variations. METHODS This cross-sectional study with 77 patients diagnosed with painful TMD according to DC/TMD and 101 asymptomatic controls realized correlations between CSI, WUR, PPT, CPM and psychosocial questionnaires (HADS, PSQI, PCS and PSS). In cases where significant correlations existed, the potential influence of these variables on CSI variation was explored through linear regression analysis. RESULTS It has been found that the CSI correlates with psychosocial variables (anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, sleep and stress) (p < 0.0006) regardless of the presence of TMD, and that 68.9% of the variation in CSI scores can be influenced by all these variables (except stress). On the contrary, the CSI does not correlate with psychophysical parameters indicative of pain amplification (wind-up ratio and conditioned pain modulation) (p > 0.320). CONCLUSION CSI is more associated with psychosocial factors than with more robust indicators of probable central sensitization (CS), thus limiting its utility in detecting this phenomenon both in TMD patients and healthy individuals. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The research highlights a noteworthy relationship between the central sensitization inventory and psychological factors, emphasizing their substantial influence on inventory values. This correlation offers crucial insights into mental health markers within the questionnaire. Additionally, the lack of connection with pain amplification implies a necessary re-evaluation of the inventory's diagnostic suitability, especially in cases of painful temporomandibular disorders. Thus, caution is urged in its application for identifying CS in these individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafaela Stocker Salbego
- Department of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil
| | - Paulo César Rodrigues Conti
- Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil
| | | | | | - Matheus Herreira-Ferreira
- Department of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil
| | | | - Yuri Martins Costa
- Department of Biosciences, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
He Y, Wang J, Zhao P, Wang R, Li M. Correlations of The Central Sensitization Inventory, conditioned pain modulation, cognitions and psychological factors in individuals with chronic neck pain: A cross-sectional study. Pain Ther 2024; 13:843-856. [PMID: 38789828 PMCID: PMC11254877 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00601-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic neck pain (CNP) is a global public health problem, with high prevalence and absenteeism rates. Central sensitization (CS) as a basis for chronic pain may play an essential role in its development and progression. It is often comorbid with low conditioned pain modulation (CPM) effects, cognitions, and psychological problems. OBJECTIVES The purposes of this study were to (1) explore the relationship between pain-related cognitions and psychological factors, CPM effects, and the central sensitization inventory (CSI) scores; and (2) determine whether cognitions and psychological factors can predict CSI scores and CPM effects in individuals with CNP. METHODS Fifty-four individuals with CNP were recruited for this cross-sectional study. The following outcome measures were evaluated: The CSI (screening tool) was compared with the cold pressor test (CPT), which was the psychophysical test used to assess the CPM; neck pain intensity using the visual analogue scale (VAS), as well as pain-related cognitions (including kinesiophobia and pain catastrophization) and psychological states (including anxiety and depression) using self-report questionnaires. RESULTS CSI score was not associated with the CPM effect (r = 0.257, p > 0.05), and no cognitions or psychological factors were associated with CPM (p > 0.05), but CSI score was moderately positively correlated with kinesiophobia (r = 0.554, p < 0.01), lowly positively correlated with pain catastrophization (r = 0.332, p = 0.017) and anxiety (r = 0.492, p < 0.01), but not depression (r = 0.207, p = 0.132). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that kinesiophobia (B = 1.308, p < 0.01) and anxiety (B = 1.806, p = 0.02) were significant positive predictors of CSI score. CONCLUSIONS The findings confirm some of our hypotheses. Accordingly, the findings inferred that the CSI does not seem to respond to CPM effect in patients with CNP effectively. In addition, CSI score was associated with cognitions and psychological factors, of which kinesiophobia and anxiety were effective predictors. In clinical practice, pain-related cognitions and psychological factors should be fully considered to manage neck pain efficiently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuwei He
- College of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing Sport University, 48 Information Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Jialin Wang
- China Institute of Sports Science, General Administration of Sport, 11 Gymnasium Road, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100061, China
| | - Peng Zhao
- China Institute of Sports Science, General Administration of Sport, 11 Gymnasium Road, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100061, China.
| | - Ruirui Wang
- College of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing Sport University, 48 Information Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Meng Li
- College of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing Sport University, 48 Information Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100084, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Manoso-Hernando D, Bailón-Cerezo J, Elizagaray-García I, Achútegui-García-Matres P, Suárez-Díez G, Gil-Martínez A. Cervical and Thoracic Spine Mobility in Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain: A Comparative Analysis with Asymptomatic Controls. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2024; 9:128. [PMID: 39189213 PMCID: PMC11348207 DOI: 10.3390/jfmk9030128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2024] [Revised: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP) is a prevalent clinical presentation characterized by substantial diagnostic uncertainty. Some of this uncertainty relates to the involvement of the cervical and thoracic spine as a source of or contributing factor to RCRSP. Thirty-two RCRSP cases and thirty-two asymptomatic controls (AC), recruited from Hospital La Paz-Carlos III between March 2023 and September 2023, were matched for age, gender and hand dominance. Assessed variables included cervical, thoracic range of motion (ROM) and neck disability index (NDI). Independent t-tests were used to compare each of these measurements and multiple linear regression was used to examine the capacity of neck or psychosocial variables to predict the variability of the NDI. The RCRSP group had significantly reduced cervical rotation [RCRSP (111.14 ± 22.98); AC (130.23 ± 21.20), d = 0.86, p < 0.01] and flexo-extension ROM [RCRSP (112.47 ± 2.07); AC (128.5 ± 17.85), d = 0.80, p < 0.01] as well as thoracic spine flexion [RCRSP (33.02 ± 1.14); AC (34.14 ± 1.01), d = 1.04, p < 0.01], extension [RCRSP (28.63 ± 0.89); AC (27.37 ± 0.89), d = -1.40, p < 0.01], right rotation [RCRSP (40.53 ± 10.39); AC (54.45 ± 9.75), d = 1.38, p < 0.01], left rotation [RCRSP (39.00 ± 11.26); AC (54.10 ± 10.51), d = 1.39, p < 0.01] and a significantly increased NDI score [RCRSP (17.56 ± 7.25); AC (2.47 ± 3.25), d = -2.69, p < 0.01]. The variables best explaining neck disability were central sensitization index and SF-12 total score (adjusted R2 = 0.75; p < 0.01). These results suggest that clinicians should assess cervical and thoracic spine mobility in patients with RCRSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Manoso-Hernando
- CranioSPain Research Group, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain; (D.M.-H.); (J.B.-C.); or (A.G.-M.)
| | - Javier Bailón-Cerezo
- CranioSPain Research Group, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain; (D.M.-H.); (J.B.-C.); or (A.G.-M.)
| | - Ignacio Elizagaray-García
- CranioSPain Research Group, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain; (D.M.-H.); (J.B.-C.); or (A.G.-M.)
| | - Pablo Achútegui-García-Matres
- Unidad de Fisioterapia, Hospital Universitario La Paz-Carlos III (IdiPAZ), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (P.A.-G.-M.); (G.S.-D.)
| | - Guillermo Suárez-Díez
- Unidad de Fisioterapia, Hospital Universitario La Paz-Carlos III (IdiPAZ), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (P.A.-G.-M.); (G.S.-D.)
| | - Alfonso Gil-Martínez
- CranioSPain Research Group, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain; (D.M.-H.); (J.B.-C.); or (A.G.-M.)
- Unidad de Fisioterapia, Hospital Universitario La Paz-Carlos III (IdiPAZ), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (P.A.-G.-M.); (G.S.-D.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tomás-Rodríguez MI, Asensio-García MDR, García RN, Delicado-Miralles M, Sánchez SH, Segura-Heras JV. Short- and medium-term effects of a single session of pain neuroscience education on pain and psychological factors in patients with chronic low back pain. A single-blind randomized clinical trial. Eur J Pain 2024. [PMID: 39017623 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biopsychosocial approach in patients suffering chronic low back pain (CLBP) promotes pain self-management strategies. Current evidence recommends high dose of Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) for clinically significant differences. However, the workload and time constraints experienced by healthcare providers impede the application of the recommended treatment regimen. In fact, Back School with a biomechanical model is the main approach to manage CLBP in public systems. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to explore the effect of a 60 min single session of PNE as an adjunct to back school on pain intensity and psychological variables patients with CLBP. METHODS A double-blind, two-arm randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in patients with CLBP who attended back school sessions held in a Spanish public hospital. A total of 121 patients were randomized into control group, who received the Back School program during 5 weeks, and intervention group, who additionally received a single session of PNE. Patient-reported outcomes were the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Central Sensitization Inventory, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, with a 12-week follow-up. RESULTS A total of 113 patients were analysed. Intervention and control group presented similar effects on pain and kinesiophobia. At follow-up, intervention group exhibited reduced sensitization and catastrophism scores compared with control, including the subscales. Additionally, PNE reduced the percentage of participants classified as having central sensitization compared with control. CONCLUSIONS Adding a single PNE session in the back school program did not reduce pain but improved psychological factors as central sensitization and pain catastrophizing at medium-term. This study highlights the potential of PNE to optimize treatment strategies for CLBP, especially in public health centres where time resources are scarce. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Adding a single PNE session in the back school program did not reduce pain but improved psychological factors as central sensitization and pain catastrophism at medium-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mª Isabel Tomás-Rodríguez
- Department of Pathology and Surgery, Center for Translational Research in Physiotherapy, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | | | - Rauf Nouni García
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Miguel Delicado-Miralles
- Department of Pathology and Surgery, Center for Translational Research in Physiotherapy, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Sergio Hernández Sánchez
- Department of Pathology and Surgery, Center for Translational Research in Physiotherapy, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Jose Vicente Segura-Heras
- Instituto Centro de Investigación Operativa, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yücel FN, Sanal-Toprak C. Central sensitization-related symptoms and their relationship to disability in prevalent chronic musculoskeletal pain: A cross-sectional study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2024; 73:103147. [PMID: 39029324 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central sensitization (CS) has an important role in chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain, which is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. OBJECTIVES To investigate the relationship between CS-related symptoms and disability in chronic MSK pain. DESIGN Multi-center cross-sectional survey. METHODS Demographic and clinical variables including location, duration, and severity of pain were recorded. In the examination of disability, Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability Index for low back pain, Neck Pain and Disability Scale for neck pain, Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand for shoulder/upper extremity pain, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for knee pain were used. CS-related symptoms were investigated via the central sensitization inventory (CSI). Based on CSI scores, patient data were compared using the T test and an ANOVA. The association between CSI and selected variables was investigated using Pearson correlation and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS The mean CSI score of five hundred participants was 40.46 (SD: 15.87). Patients with CSI≥40 were found to have higher levels of pain and disability and a poorer quality of life (p < 0.05). In ANOVA, significant differences between groups were observed in CS severity levels for VAS, symptom duration, and all clinical scores (p < 0.01). In the multivariate regression analysis, CSI and VAS scores were found to be related to disability in all pain groups, while pain duration was effective only in the change of knee disability. CONCLUSION CS-related symptoms, which are related to increased pain and disability, should be closely monitored in patients with chronic MSK pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feyza Nur Yücel
- PMR Department, Health Science University, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Deniz V, Sariyildiz A. Evaluation of the segmental distribution of pain sensitivity among patients with central sensitization associated with chronic subacromial pain syndrome: A cross-sectional study. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2024; 39:176-182. [PMID: 38876623 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pain sensitivity is the main finding of central sensitization (CS) and can occur in patients with chronic shoulder pain. However, there is limited evidence concerning the distribution of pain sensitivity in shoulders, forearms, and legs in patients with CS associated with chronic shoulder pain. The present study aimed to determine the distribution of pain sensitivity in patients with CS associated with chronic subacromial pain syndrome (SPS). METHOD This cross-sectional study included 58 patients with chronic SPS and CS (patient group) and 58 healthy participants (control group). The presence of CS was determined using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). To determine the distribution of pain sensitivity, pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurements were performed from the shoulders, forearms, and legs. RESULTS There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of sociodemographic data (p > 0.05). The patient group had a significantly higher CSI score (p < 0.001) and lower PPTs in all regions (p < 0.05) than the control group. Unlike the control group, the patient group had lower PPTs on the affected side for the shoulder [mean difference (MD) 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2 (-1.7 to -0.6)], forearm [MD 95% CI: 1.1 (-1.7 to -0.6)], and leg [MD 95% CI: 0.9 (-1.4 to -0.3)] compared with the contralateral side (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Pain sensitivity is more pronounced in the affected shoulder and the forearm and leg located on this side than in those on the contralateral side in patients with CS associated with chronic SPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volkan Deniz
- Tarsus University Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Mersin, Turkey.
| | - Aylin Sariyildiz
- Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Adana, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mingels S, Granitzer M, Schmid A, Graven-Nielsen T, Dankaerts W. Cross-sectional experimental assessment of pain modulation as part of multidimensional profiling of people with cervicogenic headache: protocol for a feasibility study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e074743. [PMID: 38890144 PMCID: PMC11191774 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An endogenous pain modulation profile, reflecting antinociceptive and pronociceptive mechanisms, may help to direct management by targeting the involved pain mechanism. For individuals with cervicogenic headache (CeH), the characteristics of such profiles were never investigated. However, the individual nature of experiencing pain demands profiling within a multidimensional framework including psychosocial lifestyle characteristics. The objective of the current protocol is to assess the pain modulation profile, which includes psychosocial lifestyle characteristics among people with CeH. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A protocol is described to map pain modulation profiles in people with CeH. A cross-sectional non-randomised experimental design will be used to assess feasibility of mapping these profiles. The pain modulation profile is composed based on results on the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Headache Impact Test and on responses to temporal summation of pain (pinprick), conditioned pain modulation and widespread hyperalgesia (mechanical pressure pain threshold and cuff algometry). Primary analyses will report results relating to outcomes on feasibility. Secondary analyses will involve an analysis of proportions (%) of the different psychosocial lifestyle profiles and pain profiles. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee Research UZ/KU Leuven (Registration number B3222024001434) on 30 May 2024. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, at scientific conferences and, through press releases. Protocol V.3. protocol date: 3 June 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Mingels
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Centre, Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Marita Granitzer
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Centre, Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Annina Schmid
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Thomas Graven-Nielsen
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Wim Dankaerts
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gräper PJ, Hartvigsen J, Scafoglieri A, Clark JR, van Trijffel E, Hallegraeff JM. Sensory profiles and their role in the persistence of central sensitization symptoms in low back pain. A prospective cohort study. Physiother Theory Pract 2024:1-10. [PMID: 38466052 DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2024.2326592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Acute lower back pain can lead to neuroplastic changes in the central nervous system, and symptoms of central sensitization after 12 weeks. While sensory sensitivity has been shown to predict symptoms of central sensitization, trait sensory profiles may be prognostic in the persistence of central sensitization symptoms in low back pain over time. OBJECTIVE To examine sensory profiles as prognostic symptoms of central sensitization in people with acute low back pain. METHODS A longitudinal type 2 prognostic factor research study was performed according to the PROGRESS framework. Baseline and 12-week follow-up measures were taken using the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile and the Central Sensitization Inventory measures. Study participants were consecutively included from primary care physiotherapy practices. Univariable, and multivariable regression analyses were performed to adjust sensory profiles based on previous history of low back pain, baseline Central Sensitization Inventory scores, level of pain, disability, age, and duration of low back pain. RESULTS After adjustment, the sensory profiles of Low Registration B = 0.44, 95%CI (0.18, 0.70), Sensation Seeking B = 0.38, 95%CI (0.19, 0.57), Sensory Sensitive B = 0.49, 95%CI (0.25, 0.74), Sensation Avoiding B = 0.40, 95% CI (0.15, 0.65) was significantly associated with the persistence of central sensitization symptoms (N = 103). CONCLUSION Sensory profiles may predict symptoms of central sensitization after 12 weeks in people with acute low back pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter J Gräper
- Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Experimental Anatomy research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Aldo Scafoglieri
- Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Experimental Anatomy research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Master Education, SOMT University of Physiotherapy, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline R Clark
- Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Experimental Anatomy research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Pains & Brains, Omokoroa, New Zealand
| | | | - Joannes M Hallegraeff
- Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Experimental Anatomy research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nijs J, Kosek E, Chiarotto A, Cook C, Danneels LA, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Hodges PW, Koes B, Louw A, Ostelo R, Scholten-Peeters GGM, Sterling M, Alkassabi O, Alsobayel H, Beales D, Bilika P, Clark JR, De Baets L, Demoulin C, de Zoete RMJ, Elma Ö, Gutke A, Hanafi R, Hotz Boendermaker S, Huysmans E, Kapreli E, Lundberg M, Malfliet A, Meziat Filho N, Reis FJJ, Voogt L, Zimney K, Smeets R, Morlion B, de Vlam K, George SZ. Nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic low back pain? The low back pain phenotyping (BACPAP) consortium's international and multidisciplinary consensus recommendations. THE LANCET. RHEUMATOLOGY 2024; 6:e178-e188. [PMID: 38310923 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(23)00324-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
The potential to classify low back pain as being characterised by dominant nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic mechanisms is a clinically relevant issue. Preliminary evidence suggests that these low back pain phenotypes might respond differently to treatments; however, more research must be done before making specific recommendations. Accordingly, the low back pain phenotyping (BACPAP) consortium was established as a group of 36 clinicians and researchers from 13 countries (five continents) and 29 institutions, to apply a modified Nominal Group Technique methodology to develop international and multidisciplinary consensus recommendations to provide guidance for identifying the dominant pain phenotype in patients with low back pain, and potentially adapt pain management strategies. The BACPAP consortium's recommendations are also intended to provide direction for future clinical research by building on the established clinical criteria for neuropathic and nociplastic pain. The BACPAP consortium's consensus recommendations are a necessary early step in the process to determine if personalised pain medicine based on pain phenotypes is feasible for low back pain management. Therefore, these recommendations are not ready to be implemented in clinical practice until additional evidence is generated that is specific to these low back pain phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Nijs
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Chronic Pain Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Belgium; Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Eva Kosek
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Alessandro Chiarotto
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of General Practice, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Chad Cook
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lieven A Danneels
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paul W Hodges
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Bart Koes
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of General Practice, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health and Center for Muscle and Joint Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Adriaan Louw
- Department of Pain Science, Evidence in Motion, Story City, IA, USA
| | - Raymond Ostelo
- Department of Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters
- Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michele Sterling
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Othman Alkassabi
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Physiotrio, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Research Chair for Healthcare Innovation, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hana Alsobayel
- Research Chair for Healthcare Innovation, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Darren Beales
- Curtin enAble Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia; Curtin School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Paraskevi Bilika
- Clinical Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Physiotherapy Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Greece
| | - Jacqui R Clark
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Pains and Brains specialist pain physiotherapy clinic, Tauranga, New Zealand
| | - Liesbet De Baets
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
| | - Christophe Demoulin
- Department of Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liège, Belgium
| | - Rutger M J de Zoete
- School of Allied Health Science and Practice, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Ömer Elma
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK
| | - Annelie Gutke
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Rikard Hanafi
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Department of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden; Medical Unit Medical Psychology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sabina Hotz Boendermaker
- University of Applied Sciences ZHAW, School of Health Professions, Institute of Physiotherapy, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Eva Huysmans
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Chronic Pain Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Belgium; Research Foundation-Flanders, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Eleni Kapreli
- Clinical Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Physiotherapy Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Greece
| | - Mari Lundberg
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Department of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anneleen Malfliet
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Research Foundation-Flanders, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ney Meziat Filho
- Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta-UNISUAM, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Felipe J J Reis
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Physical Therapy Department of Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Lennard Voogt
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Kory Zimney
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, USA
| | - Rob Smeets
- Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; Clinics in Rehabilitation, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Bart Morlion
- The Leuven Centre for Algology and Pain Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Unit Anaesthesiology and Algology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kurt de Vlam
- Division of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, Dept of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Z George
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Eckenrode BJ, Kietrys DM, Brown A, Parrott JS, Noehren B. The relationship of behavioral and psychological traits with pain sensitivity in females with patellofemoral pain: A cross-sectional study. Phys Ther Sport 2024; 66:43-52. [PMID: 38290271 DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to describe the relationship between behavioral and psychological traits with indicators of central sensitization in female runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP), and to determine if behavioral and psychological traits improve with strength training. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-eight active females (mean age 32 ± 8.1 years) with PFP completed testing at baseline, 8 weeks (post intervention), and 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Behavioral and psychological questionnaires included the General Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionairre-9, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11, and Central Sensitization Inventory. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) measures were also collected. After baseline testing, subjects were instructed in a hip and knee strengthening intervention to be completed twice daily over 8 weeks. RESULTS A statistically significant improvement was found at 12 weeks for anxiety (p = .015; ηp (Boling et al., 2010) = 0.099) and kinesiophobia (p = .041; ηp (Boling et al., 2010) = 0.076). There was no significant improvement for depression, catastrophizing, or subjective central sensitization. No significant correlations were found between any of the behavioral and psychological questionnaires with baseline QST variables. CONCLUSIONS No relationship was found for behavioral and psychological characteristics with QST measures in female runners with persistent PFP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian J Eckenrode
- Arcadia University, Department of Physical Therapy, Glenside, PA, 19038, USA.
| | - David M Kietrys
- Rutgers School of Health Professions, Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Sciences, Blackwood, NJ, 08012, USA
| | - Allison Brown
- Rutgers School of Health Professions, Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Sciences, Newark, NJ, 07101, USA
| | - J Scott Parrott
- Rutgers School of Health Professions, Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, Blackwood, NJ, 08012, USA
| | - Brian Noehren
- University of Kentucky, Department of Physical Therapy, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alqarni A, Khan F, Alabasi U, Ruscheweyh R. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of the Arabic version of the pain sensitivity questionnaire. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2024; 5:1339449. [PMID: 38380375 PMCID: PMC10877041 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1339449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) is a reliable and valid self-reported tool for the assessment of pain sensitivity in clinical practice. The PSQ has been translated, validated, and cross-culturally adapted into multiple languages. However, a validated Arabic version of the PSQ is not available. Thus, this study aims to translate, validate, and cross-culturally adapt the English version of the PSQ into the Arabic language. Methods and materials The English version of the PSQ was translated and culturally adapted into Arabic following international guidelines. The psychometric properties of the final version of the PSQ-Arabic (PSQ-A) were tested among 119 patients with different persistent musculoskeletal (MSK) pain. Findings The Cronbach's α for the PSQ-A-total, PSQ-A-moderate, and PSQ-C-minor were 0.81, 0.79, and 0.76, respectively. The means for the PSQ-A-total, PSQ-A-moderate, and PSQ-C-minor scores were 5.07 (±1.28), 5.64 (±2.07), and 4.50 (±0.50). The test-retest reliability measured with the interclass correlation coefficient for 68 subjects was 0.80 for the PSQ-A-total, 0.74 for the PSQ-A-moderate, and 0.77 for the PSQ-A-minor. The PSQ-A-total and the PSQ-A-minor showed positive significant correlations with pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) (r = 0.15, 0.17); P ≤ 0.05), respectively. The PSQ-A-total, PSQ-A-moderate, and PSQ-A-minor showed positive significant correlations with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-pain scores (r = 0.47, 0.43, 0.45; P ≤ 0.01), respectively and with the BPI-pain interference scores (r = 0.37, 0.33, 0.34; P ≤ 0.01), respectively. Conclusions This study shows that the PSQ-A is a reliable and valid tool to assess individuals with pain sensitivity in Arabic populations. Further studies are recommended to examine the concurrent validity of the PSQ-A against experimental pain sensitivity measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Alqarni
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fayaz Khan
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Umar Alabasi
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ruth Ruscheweyh
- Department of Neurology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dams L, Van der Gucht E, Haenen V, Devoogdt N, Smeets A, Bernar K, Morlion B, Moloney N, Fieuws S, De Groef A, Meeus M. Effectiveness of pain neuroscience education on somatosensory functioning after surgery for breast cancer: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2024; 307:248-272. [PMID: 36594663 DOI: 10.1002/ar.25127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Pain is one of the most prevalent and long-term adverse effects described by people who have undergone breast cancer surgery. Non-helpful perceptions and thoughts about pain may contribute to the transition of acute to persistent pain. Adding educational interventions to the current physical therapy program in this population may help to improve or prevent persistent pain. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is a type of educational intervention that addresses the experience of pain in a broader sense by explaining pain not only from a biomedical perspective, but also from a psychological and social perspective. A double-blinded randomized controlled trial (EduCan trial) investigated whether PNE, in addition to a standard physiotherapy program immediately after surgery for breast cancer, was more effective on somatosensory functioning in the short (4 months postoperatively) and long term (18 months postoperatively), than providing a biomedical explanation for pain. Somatosensory functioning was evaluated using a self-reported questionnaire as well as a comprehensive quantitative sensory testing evaluation. The findings of this study revealed that adding six sessions of PNE to a standard physical therapy program (n = 184) did not result in a significantly different course of somatosensory functioning up to 18 months postoperatively as compared to biomedical pain education. These findings provide an interesting basis for future research into who should receive PNE after surgery for breast cancer (e.g., patient profiling or phenotyping) and how we can tailor it to the individual to increase its effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lore Dams
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Pain In Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elien Van der Gucht
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Pain In Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Haenen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nele Devoogdt
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Center for Lymphedema, UZ Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Smeets
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, KUL Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Bernar
- The Leuven Centre for Algology and Pain Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart Morlion
- The Leuven Centre for Algology and Pain Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Section Anaesthesiology and Algology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Niamh Moloney
- Department of Exercise Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Steffen Fieuws
- Interuniversity Center for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, University of Leuven and University of Hasselt, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An De Groef
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Pain In Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mira Meeus
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Pain In Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rosa DP, Dubé MO, Roy JS. Psychometric Properties of Patient-reported Outcome Measures to Assess Resilience in Individuals with Musculoskeletal Pain or Rheumatic Conditions: A COSMIN-based Systematic Review. Clin J Pain 2023; 39:695-706. [PMID: 37768873 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this systematic review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess resilience in individuals with musculoskeletal and rheumatic conditions. METHODS Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) were searched. Studies assessing any measurement property in the target populations were included. Two reviewers independently screened all studies and assessed the risk of bias using the COSMIN checklist. Thereafter, each measurement property of each PROM was classified as sufficient, insufficient, or inconsistent based on the COSMIN criteria for good measurement properties. RESULTS Four families of PROMs [Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS); Resilience Scale (RS-18); Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10 and CD-RISC-2); and Pain Resilience Scale (PRS-14 and PRS-12)] were identified from the 9 included studies. Even if no PROM showed sufficient evidence for all measurement properties, the PRS and CD-RISC had the most properties evaluated and showed the best measurement properties, although responsiveness still needs to be assessed for both PROMs. Both PROMs showed good levels of reliability (intraclass coefficient correlation 0.61 to 0.8) and good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥0.70). Minimal detectable change values were 24.5% for PRS and between 4.7% and 29.8% for CD-RISC. DISCUSSION Although BRCS, RS-18, CD-RISC, and PRS have been used to evaluate resilience in individuals with musculoskeletal and rheumatic conditions, the current evidence only supports the use of PRS and CD-RISC in this population. Further methodological studies are therefore needed and should prioritize the assessment of reliability and responsiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dayana Patricia Rosa
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval & Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris)
| | - Marc-Olivier Dubé
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval & Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris)
| | - Jean-Sébastien Roy
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval & Researcher, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), Quebec City, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kotikalapudi R, Kincses B, Zunhammer M, Schlitt F, Asan L, Schmidt-Wilcke T, Kincses ZT, Bingel U, Spisak T. Brain morphology predicts individual sensitivity to pain: a multicenter machine learning approach. Pain 2023; 164:2516-2527. [PMID: 37318027 PMCID: PMC10578427 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Sensitivity to pain shows a remarkable interindividual variance that has been reported to both forecast and accompany various clinical pain conditions. Although pain thresholds have been reported to be associated to brain morphology, it is still unclear how well these findings replicate in independent data and whether they are powerful enough to provide reliable pain sensitivity predictions on the individual level. In this study, we constructed a predictive model of pain sensitivity (as measured with pain thresholds) using structural magnetic resonance imaging-based cortical thickness data from a multicentre data set (3 centres and 131 healthy participants). Cross-validated estimates revealed a statistically significant and clinically relevant predictive performance (Pearson r = 0.36, P < 0.0002, R2 = 0.13). The predictions were found to be specific to physical pain thresholds and not biased towards potential confounding effects (eg, anxiety, stress, depression, centre effects, and pain self-evaluation). Analysis of model coefficients suggests that the most robust cortical thickness predictors of pain sensitivity are the right rostral anterior cingulate gyrus, left parahippocampal gyrus, and left temporal pole. Cortical thickness in these regions was negatively correlated to pain sensitivity. Our results can be considered as a proof-of-concept for the capacity of brain morphology to predict pain sensitivity, paving the way towards future multimodal brain-based biomarkers of pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raviteja Kotikalapudi
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Balint Kincses
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioural Sciences, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Matthias Zunhammer
- Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioural Sciences, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Frederik Schlitt
- Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioural Sciences, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Livia Asan
- Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioural Sciences, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke
- Institute for Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Neurocenter, District Hospital Mainkofen, Deggendorf, Germany
| | - Zsigmond T. Kincses
- Departments of Neurology and
- Radiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Ulrike Bingel
- Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioural Sciences, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Tamas Spisak
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cancela-Cilleruelo I, Rodríguez-Jiménez J, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Arendt-Nielsen L, Arias-Buría JL. Sensitization-associated and neuropathic-associated symptoms in patients with unilateral lateral elbow tendinopathy: an exploratory study. Physiother Theory Pract 2023:1-8. [PMID: 37795605 DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2023.2264384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We evaluate the presence of sensitization-associated symptoms and neuropathic pain features and identify if there is an association between these symptoms and pressure pain sensitivity, pain, and related-disability in lateral elbow tendinopathy. METHODS Thirty-seven (43% women, age: 45.5 ± 9.5 years) patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy completed: demographic (i.e. age, height, and weight); clinical (i.e. pain history, pain intensity, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand); and psychophysical (i.e. pressure pain thresholds at the elbow, cervical spine, hand, and leg) outcomes, and the Central Sensitization Inventory and Self-administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs questionnaires. Step-wise multiple linear regression models were performed to identify predictors of sensitization- or neuropathic-associated symptoms. RESULTS Six (16%) patients exhibited sensitization-associated symptoms (mean: 46.5, SD: 6.1), whereas 13 (35%) patients showed neuropathic-associated symptoms (mean: 13.5; SD: 1.4). Sensitization-associated symptoms were positively associated with neuropathic-associated symptoms (r = 0.538, P = .001) and negatively associated with pressure pain thresholds at the leg (r = -0.378, P = .021). Neuropathic-associated symptoms were positively associated with related-disability (r = 0.479, P = .003) and negatively associated with pressure pain threshold at the elbow (r = -0.394, P = .017). Stepwise regression analyses revealed that neuropathic-like symptoms explained 26.8% of the variance of sensitization symptoms (r2: 0.268), whereas pressure pain threshold at the elbow explained an additional 6.6% to neuropathic-like symptoms (r2: 0.334). CONCLUSION This explorative study identified sensitization- and neuropathic-associated symptoms in 16% and 35% of the people with lateral elbow tendinopathy. Sensitization- and neuropathic-associated symptoms were associated. Pressure pain sensitivity at the elbow (peripheral sensitization) was associated with neuropathic -associated symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ignacio Cancela-Cilleruelo
- Escuela Internacional de Doctorado, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Spain
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain
| | - Jorge Rodríguez-Jiménez
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain
| | - César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), SMI, Department of Health Science and Technology, School of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Lars Arendt-Nielsen
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), SMI, Department of Health Science and Technology, School of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mech-Sense, Clinical Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark, Clinical Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - José L Arias-Buría
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wilson AT, Razzell C, Hanney WJ. The Association Between the Patient Self-Report Survey for the Assessment of Fibromyalgia with Pain Sensitivity and Psychological Factors in Individuals with Musculoskeletal Pain. J Pain Res 2023; 16:3297-3308. [PMID: 37795178 PMCID: PMC10545802 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s425687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The Patient Self-Report Survey for the Assessment of Fibromyalgia may potentially be a method for subgrouping patients with musculoskeletal pain who have a nociplastic pain presentation. Limited research has explored the convergent validity of this questionnaire against psychophysical measures of pain sensitivity and psychological factors in individuals with musculoskeletal pain. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the strength of the association between total scores on the Patient Self-Report Survey for the Assessment of Fibromyalgia with clinical, pain sensitivity, and psychological factors. Patients and Methods As a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study, participants with shoulder (n = 20) or low back pain (n = 20) completed Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST), pain-related psychological questionnaires, and the Patient Self-Report Survey for the Assessment of Fibromyalgia. A Spearman correlation determined the association between total scores on the Patient Self Report Survey for the Assessment of Fibromyalgia with psychological factors and pain sensitivity behaviorally assessed with QST. Results Negative psychological factors demonstrate moderate to strong positive associations with the Patient Self-Report Survey for the Assessment of Fibromyalgia (rho range = 0.36-0.80), suggesting greater negative psychological factors were observed in patients with higher severity of fibromyalgia symptoms. Pain sensitivity factors demonstrated weak to moderate negative associations with The Patient Self-Report Survey for the Assessment of Fibromyalgia (PPT rho range=-0.36- -0.41), suggesting that elevated pain sensitivity was observed in individuals with higher severity of nociplastic pain symptoms. Conclusion Collectively, this supports the convergent validity of the Patient Self-Report Survey for the Assessment of Fibromyalgia with psychological and pain sensitivity factors in patients with musculoskeletal pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail T Wilson
- University of Central Florida, School of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Professions and Sciences, Orlando, FL, USA
- Musculoskeletal Research Lab, Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Charlotte Razzell
- Musculoskeletal Research Lab, Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - William J Hanney
- University of Central Florida, School of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Professions and Sciences, Orlando, FL, USA
- Musculoskeletal Research Lab, Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Peng R, Yang R, Ning N. Central sensitization syndrome in patients with rotator cuff tear: prevalence and associated factors. Postgrad Med 2023; 135:593-600. [PMID: 37505056 DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2023.2241343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A significant number of rotator cuff tear (RCT) patients developed chronic shoulder pain that did not correspond to physiological changes. Central sensitization syndrome (CSS) is a neurophysiological adaptation process that can result in hypersensitivity to peripheral stimuli. Although there is evidence of an association between CSS and musculoskeletal problems, no studies have focused on the association between CSS and RCT. The primary purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of CSS in patients with RCT. The secondary purpose was to document the associated conditions and comorbidity that were associated with the CSS. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study of patients with RCT who completed the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). Patients with score of ≥ 40/100 were considered positive for CSS. Demographic and clinical data and CSI results were collected to analyze the prevalence and associated factors of CSS in RCT patients. RESULTS A total of 404 RCT patients were included, and the CSS prevalence was 39.4%. Compared to the non-CSS group, the CSS group had an odds ratio of 4.13 (95% CI, 2.70-6.32; p<0.001) for ages 51-60, 3.07 (95% CI, 2.00-4.69; p<0.001) for symptoms lasting more than 6 months, 6.08 (95% CI, 3.90-9.47; p<0.001) for nonphysical laborers, 3.69 (95%CI, 2.42-5.61; p<0.001) for long head of biceps (LHB) abnormality, 2.93 (95% CI, 1.93-4.45; p<0.001) for concurrent shoulder stiffness, 4.82 (95% CI, 2.55-9.10; p<0.001) for anxiety or panic episodes, and 2.11 (95% CI, 1.12, 4.00; p<0.001) for depression. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of CSS in patients with RCT was relatively high at 39.4%. The CSS was associated with higher age, female gender, and clinical findings of symptoms lasting over six months, nonphysical laborers, abnormal LHB, concurrent shoulder stiffness, anxiety, and depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Run Peng
- Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Rong Yang
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ning Ning
- Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vervullens S, Meert L, Meeus M, Baert I, Heusdens CHW, Caethoven C, Charpentier N, Vervliet A, Smeets RJEM. Evolution of somatosensory processing signs after nociceptive targeted surgery in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Pain 2023; 164:1428-1450. [PMID: 36727896 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Surgery is often advised when conservative treatment fails in musculoskeletal pain conditions, but a substantial proportion still suffers chronic pain after surgery. Somatosensory processing system (SPS) signs were previously studied as potential predictors for chronic postsurgical pain, but results are inconsistent. Therefore, studying the evolution of SPS signs could be of added value. The aim was to summarize all studies that measured how SPS signs evolved after nociceptive targeted surgery in musculoskeletal disorders and to find preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative predictors for the evolution of these SPS signs. Data were summarized, and risk of bias and level of evidence and recommendation were determined. Twenty-one studies were included. Five scored a low, 3 a moderate, and 13 a high risk of bias. In general, no consistent evolution of SPS signs comparing preoperative and postoperative values and predictors for this evolution in musculoskeletal disorders could be found. In most cases, static quantitative sensory testing (QST) did not change or conflicting results were found. On the other hand, dynamic QST mostly improved after surgery. Worthfully mentioning is that worsening of SPS signs was only seen at a follow-up of <3 months after surgery, that conclusions are stronger when evaluating dynamic QST with a follow-up of ≥3 months after surgery, and that pain improvement postsurgery was an important predictor. Future high-quality research should focus on the evolution of SPS signs after nociceptive targeted surgery, accounting for pain improvement groups and focusing on preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative predictors of this evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Vervullens
- Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
- Research School CAPHRI, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maastricht University Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM) Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lotte Meert
- Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
- Research School CAPHRI, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maastricht University Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM) Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Mira Meeus
- Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM) Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Isabel Baert
- Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM) Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Christiaan H W Heusdens
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Cleo Caethoven
- Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Nina Charpentier
- Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Amber Vervliet
- Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Rob J E M Smeets
- Research School CAPHRI, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maastricht University Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM) Antwerp, Belgium
- CIR Revalidatie, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Şaş S, Cengiz G, Kaplan H. The effect of central sensitization on disease activity measures, quality of life and clinical parameters in axial spondyloarthritis: a cross-sectional study. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES 2023; 30:176-184. [PMID: 37476680 PMCID: PMC10351372 DOI: 10.4078/jrd.2023.0009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
Objective Despite biological drug therapy, pain remains a persistent complaint in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). We aimed to investigate the effect of central sensitization (CS) on disease activity measures, quality of life, and clinical parameters in axSpA patients. Methods We consecutively recruited axSpA patients who were followed up at our rheumatology outpatient clinic, and age- and sex-matched controls in this cross-sectional study. The central sensitization inventory, douleur neuropathique 4 (DN4) questions, and 2010 American College of Rheumatology fibromyalgia (FM) diagnostic criteria were applied to all individuals. The patients' clinical parameters were recorded. The data of the patient and control groups were compared. Results Of the 116 axSpA patients (57 female) and 95 controls (46 female) who participated in this study, CS was determined in 46.6% of axSpA patients and 13.7% of controls (p<0.001). Patients with CS exhibited high disease activity, and poor quality of life and functionality than without it (all p<0.001). The median CS, frequency of FM and frequency of neuropathic pain were higher in patients than in the controls (all p<0.001). CS-related conditions, including anxiety and depression, were higher in axSpA patients than in controls (both p<0.05). Conclusion The results showed that CS was common in axSpA patients, and patients with CS had higher disease activity, worse quality of life, and worse functional status than those without CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Senem Şaş
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Erciyes University School of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Gizem Cengiz
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Erciyes University School of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Hüseyin Kaplan
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Erciyes University School of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Adams GR, Gandhi W, Harrison R, van Reekum CM, Wood-Anderson D, Gilron I, Salomons TV. Do "central sensitization" questionnaires reflect measures of nociceptive sensitization or psychological constructs? A systematic review and meta-analyses. Pain 2023; 164:1222-1239. [PMID: 36729810 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Central sensitization (CS) is defined as an increased nociceptive responsiveness due to sensitization of neurons in the central nervous system, usually the result of prolonged nociceptive input or a disease state associated with noxious inputs (eg, polyarthritis). The concept of CS has recently been adopted in clinical assessments of chronic pain, but its diagnosis in humans may now include a wide range of hypervigilant responses. The purpose of this review is to ascertain whether self-report questionnaires linked with CS are associated with enhanced nociceptive responses or whether they measure sensitivity in a broader sense (ie, emotional responses). According to our published, PROSPERO-registered review protocol (CRD42021208731), a predefined search of studies that involve the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) or Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ), correlated with either nociceptive sensory tests or emotional hypervigilance was conducted on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Correlations between the CSI or PSQ with our primary outcomes were extracted and meta-analysed. A review of 66 studies totalling 13,284 participants found that the CSI (but not the PSQ) strongly correlated with psychological constructs: depression, anxiety, stress, pain catastrophising, sleep, and kinesiophobia. The CSI and PSQ showed weak or no correlations with experimental measures of nociceptive sensitivity: pain thresholds, temporal summation, or conditioned pain modulation. The PSQ did, however, correlate strongly with phasic heat and tonic cold pain tests. The studies reviewed did not provide sufficient evidence that self-report measures reflect a canonical understanding of CS. The CSI more closely reflects psychological hypervigilance than increased responsiveness of nociceptive neurons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greig R Adams
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom
| | - Wiebke Gandhi
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Harrison
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom
| | - Carien M van Reekum
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ian Gilron
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Tim V Salomons
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zieliński G, Matysik-Woźniak A, Baszczowski M, Rapa M, Ginszt M, Szkutnik J, Rejdak R, Gawda P. Exploratory Study on Central Sensitization and Bioelectrical Activity of the Selected Masticatory Muscles in Subjects with Myopia. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:4524. [PMID: 36901544 PMCID: PMC10001754 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20054524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Myopia is one of the most common eye disorders involving abnormal focusing of light rays. The studies recognize the association between the stomatognathic and visual systems. This compound may have a neurological basis associated with disorders such as central sensitization. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of central sensitization on the bioelectrical activity of selected muscles of the masticatory organ in subjects with myopia. METHODS Selected masticatory and cervical spine muscles were analyzed using an eight-channel BioEMG III electromyograph. Central sensitization was analyzed using the central sensitization inventory. RESULTS Statistical analysis revealed significantly higher scores on the central sensitization inventory in subjects with axial myopia compared to subjects without refractive error. Repeated positive correlations were observed in the sternocleidomastoid muscle activity and negative correlations in the digastric muscle activity during open and closed eyes in myopic subjects. CONCLUSIONS Subjects with myopia have an increased score in the central sensitization inventory. The increase in the central sensitization inventory score is connected with the changes within the electromyographic activity of the masticatory and neck muscles. The effect of central sensitization on masticatory muscle activity in myopic subjects requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grzegorz Zieliński
- Department of Sports Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
| | - Anna Matysik-Woźniak
- Department of General and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
| | - Michał Baszczowski
- Interdisciplinary Scientific Group of Sports Medicine, Department of Sports Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
| | - Maria Rapa
- Students’ Scientific Association at the Department and Clinic of General and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
| | - Michał Ginszt
- Department of Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
| | - Jacek Szkutnik
- Independent Unit of Functional Masticatory Disorders, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
| | - Robert Rejdak
- Department of General and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
| | - Piotr Gawda
- Department of Sports Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Trouvin AP, Simunek A, Coste J, Medkour T, Carvès S, Bouhassira D, Perrot S. Mechanisms of chronic pain in inflammatory rheumatism: the role of descending modulation. Pain 2023; 164:605-612. [PMID: 35984362 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Persistent pain despite satisfactory disease treatment is frequent in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (Spa) and may result from specific changes in central pain processing. We assessed these mechanisms further by systematically comparing thermal pain thresholds and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) between patients with active RA or Spa and healthy controls. We included 50 patients with RA and 50 patients with Spa and 100 age-matched and sex-matched controls. Heat and cold pain thresholds (HPT-CPT) were measured on the dominant forearm, and CPM was assessed by applying conditioning stimuli (immersion in a cold-water bath) to one foot and the nondominant hand in 2 successive randomized sequences. Descending pain modulation was assessed as the difference in HPTs (in °C) before and after conditioning. Larger HPT differences (ie, a larger CPM effect) reflected more efficient descending inhibition. Potential associations between changes in CPM and clinical data, including disease activity, pain intensity, and psychological and functional variables, were systematically assessed. Heat pain threshold and cold pain threshold were similar in patients and controls. The mean CPM effect was significantly weaker in patients than that in controls for conditioning applied to either the foot (0.25°C ±2.57 vs 2.79°C ±2.31; P < 0.001) or the nondominant hand (0.57°C ±2.74 vs 2.68°C ±2.12; P < 0.001). The smaller CPM effect in patients was correlated with average pain intensity, but not with disease activity or other clinical characteristics, suggesting a significant pathophysiological role for changes in endogenous pain modulation in the mechanisms of chronic pain associated with inflammatory rheumatism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Priscille Trouvin
- Pain Medicine Department, GHU Paris Centre-Cochin, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Inserm U987, UVSQ, Paris-Saclay University, Boulogne Billancourt, France
| | - Arielle Simunek
- Pain Medicine Department, GHU Paris Centre-Cochin, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Joël Coste
- Pain Medicine Department, GHU Paris Centre-Cochin, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Unit, GHU Paris Centre-Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Terkia Medkour
- Pain Medicine Department, GHU Paris Centre-Cochin, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Inserm U987, UVSQ, Paris-Saclay University, Boulogne Billancourt, France
| | - Sandrine Carvès
- Pain Medicine Department, GHU Paris Centre-Cochin, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Didier Bouhassira
- Inserm U987, UVSQ, Paris-Saclay University, Boulogne Billancourt, France
- Pain Medicine Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Serge Perrot
- Pain Medicine Department, GHU Paris Centre-Cochin, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Inserm U987, UVSQ, Paris-Saclay University, Boulogne Billancourt, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Orr NL, Huang AJ, Liu YD, Noga H, Bedaiwy MA, Williams C, Allaire C, Yong PJ. Association of Central Sensitization Inventory Scores With Pain Outcomes After Endometriosis Surgery. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e230780. [PMID: 36848090 PMCID: PMC9972194 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE A subset of people who undergo surgery for endometriosis have persistent pain, suggesting that other factors besides the endometriosis, such as central sensitization, may play a role in this pain. The Central Sensitization Inventory, a validated self-reported questionnaire of central sensitization symptoms, may identify individuals with endometriosis who have more pain after surgery due to pain sensitization. OBJECTIVE To examine whether greater baseline Central Sensitization Inventory scores are associated with postsurgical pain outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prospective, longitudinal cohort study performed at a tertiary center for endometriosis and pelvic pain in British Columbia, Canada, included all patients aged 18 to 50 years with diagnosed or suspected endometriosis and a baseline visit between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, who underwent surgery after the baseline visit. Individuals who were menopausal, had a prior hysterectomy, or were missing data for outcomes or measures were excluded. Data analysis was performed from July 2021 to June 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was chronic pelvic pain at follow-up measured on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 to 3 indicating no pain or mild pain, 4 to 6 indicating moderate pain, and 7 to 10 indicating severe pain. Secondary outcomes were deep dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, dyschezia, and back pain at follow-up. The main variable of interest was baseline Central Sensitization Inventory score (measured from 0 to 100, consisting of 25 self-reported questions rated from 0 to 4 [never, rarely, sometimes, often, and always, respectively]). RESULTS A total of 239 patients (mean [SD] age, 34 [7] years; 189 [79.1%] White [11 (5.8%) identified as White mixed with another ethnicity], 1 [0.4%] Black or African American, 29 [12.1%] Asian, 2 [0.8%] Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 16 [6.7%] other, and 2 [0.8%] mixed race or ethnicity) with follow-up data at more than 4 months after surgery were included in this study (71.0% follow-up rate). The mean (SD) baseline Central Sensitization Inventory score was 43.8 (18.2), and the mean (SD) follow-up was 16.1 (6.1) months. Higher baseline Central Sensitization Inventory scores were significantly associated with higher chronic pelvic pain (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P = .02), deep dyspareunia (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P = .004), dyschezia (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P < .001), and back pain (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P = .02) at follow-up, when controlling for baseline pain scores. The Central Sensitization Inventory scores themselves decreased slightly from baseline to follow-up (mean [SD] score, 43.8 [18.2] vs 41.7 [18.9]; P = .05); however, individuals with high baseline Central Sensitization Inventory scores still had high scores at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of 239 patients with endometriosis, higher Central Sensitization Inventory scores at baseline were associated with worse pain outcomes after endometriosis surgery, when controlling for baseline pain scores. The Central Sensitization Inventory could be used to counsel patients with endometriosis on their expected outcomes after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha L. Orr
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- University of British Columbia Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alice J. Huang
- University of British Columbia Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Yang Doris Liu
- University of British Columbia Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Heather Noga
- University of British Columbia Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Women’s Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mohamed A. Bedaiwy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- University of British Columbia Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Women’s Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Christina Williams
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- University of British Columbia Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Women’s Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Catherine Allaire
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- University of British Columbia Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Women’s Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul J. Yong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- University of British Columbia Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Women’s Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
The Effect of Spinal Muscle Fatigue and Psychosocial Factors on Pressure-Pain Threshold in Healthy Adults. Pain Res Manag 2023; 2023:7336477. [PMID: 36741677 PMCID: PMC9891829 DOI: 10.1155/2023/7336477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Objective Pain sensitivity decreases following isometric exercise. It is not clear whether this exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) occurs to the same extent in men and women. It is also unclear if the effect is systemic or local to the exercised musculature. The aim of our study was to investigate whether fatiguing isometric exercise of the spinal and hip extensors would result in increased pressure pain threshold (PPT) at sites local to and remote from the exercised muscles in healthy men and women and whether there is a relationship between central sensitization, psychosocial factors, and PPT. Subjects 35 healthy adults (age 27.1 ± 4.5 years, 22 women). Methods This was a within-subjects cohort study. Participants completed questionnaires quantifying central sensitization, pain catastrophizing, sleepiness/insomnia, anxiety, and depression. PPT was assessed at the lumbar and thoracic paraspinals, hamstrings, gastrocnemius, wrist, and third digit before and immediately after participants performed the Biering-Sorensen test to failure. Results PPT increased postexercise in the thoracic paraspinals, hamstrings, and gastrocnemius in men and women and in the lumbar paraspinals in men only but did not change at the wrist and digit sites. A lower average PPT at baseline was associated with a higher central sensitization scores. A greater increase in average PPT postfatigue was significantly associated with higher average PPT at baseline. Conclusions Exercise-induced hypoalgesia occurs at sites overlying the muscles involved in fatiguing exercise, but not at remote sites, and is more evident in males than females. The magnitude of EIH depends upon baseline PPT. Even in healthy individuals, greater central sensitization is associated with lower baseline PPT.
Collapse
|
26
|
Goudman L, De Smedt A, Roggeman S, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Hatem SM, Schiltz M, Billot M, Roulaud M, Rigoard P, Moens M. Association between Experimental Pain Measurements and the Central Sensitization Inventory in Patients at Least 3 Months after COVID-19 Infection: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12020661. [PMID: 36675590 PMCID: PMC9862134 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Fatigue, pain, headache, brain fog, anosmia, ageusia, mood symptoms, and sleep disorders are symptoms commonly experienced by people with post-COVID-19 condition. These symptoms could be considered as manifestations of central sensitization. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether there are indicators of central sensitization by using experimental pain measurements and to determine their association with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A cross-sectional study including 42 patients after COVID-19 infection was conducted. The central sensitization inventory (CSI) was administered as a PROM to evaluate central-sensitization-associated symptoms. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT), temporal summation, and descending nociceptive pain inhibition (CPM) were assessed as experimental pain measurements. The median score on the CSI was 46.5 (Q1-Q3: 33-54). The presence of central-sensitization-associated symptoms was seen in 64.3% of patients based on the CSI (≥40/100 points). A deficient CPM was seen in 12% and 14% of patients when measured at the trapezius and rectus femoris, respectively. A negative correlation between pressure sensitivity on the rectus femoris and the CSI score (r = -0.36, 95%CI -0.13 to -0.65, p = 0.007) was observed. Central-sensitization-associated symptoms were present in up to 64.3% of patients post-COVID-19 infection, based on a PROM, i.e., the CSI. A more objective evaluation of nociceptive processing through experimental pain measurements was less suggestive of indicators of central sensitization. Only a small negative correlation between pressure sensitivity and the CSI was observed, thereby pointing towards the discrepancy between the CSI and experimental pain measurements and presumably the complementary need for both to evaluate potential indicators of central sensitization in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Goudman
- STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Pain in Motion (PAIN) Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Egmontstraat 5, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +32-24775514
| | - Ann De Smedt
- STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stijn Roggeman
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - César Fernández-de-las-Peñas
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), SMI, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Samar M. Hatem
- STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marc Schiltz
- STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Maxime Billot
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France
| | - Manuel Roulaud
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France
| | - Philippe Rigoard
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France
- Department of Spine Surgery & Neuromodulation, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France
- Pprime Institute UPR 3346, CNRS, ISAE-ENSMA, University of Poitiers, 86360 Chasseneuil-du-Poitou, France
| | - Maarten Moens
- STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Pain in Motion (PAIN) Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wilson AT, Riley JL, Bishop MD, Beneciuk JM, Cruz-Almeida Y, Bialosky JE. Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Receiving Physical Therapy for Low Back Pain with a Nociplastic Pain Presentation: A Secondary Analysis. Pain Res Manag 2023; 2023:5326261. [PMID: 36935875 PMCID: PMC10023235 DOI: 10.1155/2023/5326261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Individuals with low back pain (LBP) may be classified based on mechanistic descriptors, such as a nociplastic pain presentation (NPP). The purpose of this secondary analysis was to examine the frequency and characteristics of patients with a NPP referred to physical therapy with LBP. Additionally, we characterized patients with LBP meeting the criteria for NPP by demographic, clinical, psychological, and pain sensitivity variables. Finally, we examined short- and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with a NPP compared to those without a NPP. Materials and Methods Patients referred to physical therapy for LBP completed the Patient Self-report Survey for the Assessment of Fibromyalgia. Participants were categorized as "LBP with NPP" or "LBP without NPP" based on the threshold established in this measure. A rank sum test examined for differences in pain-related psychological factors and pressure-pain threshold between groups. Next, a Friedman test examined if LBP intensity and disability trajectories differed by groups at one and six months after initiation of physical therapy. Results 22.2% of patients referred to physical therapy for LBP met the criteria for a NPP. Patients with a NPP reported significantly greater disability, pain catastrophizing, depression, anxiety, and somatization compared to individuals without a NPP (p < 0.05). Pressure-pain threshold did not differ between groups (p > 0.05). Individuals with LBP with a NPP demonstrated nonsignificant, small to medium reductions in pain and disability at one and six months. Individuals experiencing LBP without a NPP demonstrated significant reductions in pain and disability in the short- and long term. Conclusion Patients with LBP with a NPP displayed greater negative pain-related psychological factors but similar pain sensitivity compared to LBP without NPP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail T. Wilson
- 1University of Central Florida, School of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Professions and Sciences, Orlando, FL, USA
- 2Musculoskeletal Research Lab, Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Joseph L. Riley
- 3University of Florida, Department of Community Dentistry and Behavioral Science, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Mark D. Bishop
- 4Pain Research & Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- 5University of Florida Department of Physical Therapy, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jason M. Beneciuk
- 5University of Florida Department of Physical Therapy, Gainesville, FL, USA
- 6Clinical Research Center, Brooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Yenisel Cruz-Almeida
- 3University of Florida, Department of Community Dentistry and Behavioral Science, Gainesville, FL, USA
- 4Pain Research & Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Joel E. Bialosky
- 5University of Florida Department of Physical Therapy, Gainesville, FL, USA
- 6Clinical Research Center, Brooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chys M, Bontinck J, Voogt L, Sendarrubias GMG, Cagnie B, Meeus M, De Meulemeester K. Immediate effects of dry needling on pain sensitivity and pain modulation in patients with chronic idiopathic neck pain: a single-blinded randomized clinical trial. Braz J Phys Ther 2023; 27:100481. [PMID: 36709694 PMCID: PMC9894914 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2023.100481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dry needling is frequently used for the treatment of neck pain but knowledge about its neurophysiological central effects is scarce. OBJECTIVES To compare the immediate effects of a single session of dry needling (DN) and sham needling (SN) on local and distant pressure pain thresholds and conditioned pain modulation in patients with chronic idiopathic neck pain. METHOD Participants with chronic idiopathic neck pain were randomly allocated to a DN or SN group. The primary outcome measure was the pressure pain threshold (PPT) at one peripheral location: quadriceps muscle (Q). Secondary outcome measures were local PPTs at the treated (most painful) (tUT) and non-treated upper trapezius muscle (ntUT), absolute and relative conditioned pain modulation (CPM) effects and pain during hot water immersion. Patients were assessed at baseline and immediately post intervention. Linear mixed models were used to examine interaction effects as well as between- and within-group differences. RESULTS Fifty-four participants were included for statistical analysis. Linear mixed model analyses showed no significant "group X time" interaction effects for any of the outcome measures. The relative CPM effect at the Q was significantly higher post-intervention, compared to baseline within the DN group (mean difference= 13.52%; 95% CI: 0.46, 26.59). CONCLUSION The present study shows no superior effect of DN, compared to SN, in the immediate effect on local and distant PPTs and CPM in patients with chronic idiopathic neck pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolein Chys
- Spine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Gent 9000, Belgium.
| | - Jente Bontinck
- Spine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Gent 9000, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group, www.paininmotion.be
| | - Lennard Voogt
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, www.paininmotion.be; Research Centre for Health Care Innovations, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Barbara Cagnie
- Spine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Gent 9000, Belgium
| | - Mira Meeus
- Spine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Gent 9000, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group, www.paininmotion.be; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, MOVANT Research group, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kayleigh De Meulemeester
- Spine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Gent 9000, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group, www.paininmotion.be
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mertens MG, Struyf F, Lluch Girbes E, Dueñas L, Verborgt O, Meeus M. Autonomic Nervous System Function and Central Pain Processing in People With Frozen Shoulder: A Case-control Study. Clin J Pain 2022; 38:659-669. [PMID: 36111678 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The pathophysiology of a frozen shoulder (FS) is thought to be related to chronic inflammation. Chronic inflammation may disturb the immune system and consequently the nervous system as part of an overarching system. The aim of this study was to determine the presence of disturbed autonomic nervous system function and altered central pain processing (CPP) in patients with FS. Secondarily, the presence of psychological variables (catastrophizing and hypervigilance) and self-reported associated symptoms of altered CPP in patients with FS were investigated. METHODS Patients with FS and healthy controls completed the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (autonomic function) and underwent quantitative sensory testing to assess tactile sensitivity (ie, allodynia), pressure pain thresholds (PPTs, ie, hyperalgesia), temporal summation of pain, and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM). Psychological issues were explored with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire, and self-reported symptoms associated with altered CPP were determined with the Central Sensitization Inventory. RESULTS Thirty-two patients with FS and 35 healthy controls were analyzed in the study. Patients with FS showed more self-reported autonomic symptoms and symptoms of altered CPP, higher levels of pain catastrophizing and hypervigilance, and are more sensitive to tactile touches and mechanical pressure compared with controls. DISCUSSION On the basis of the effect sizes, between-group differences in allodynia, hyperalgesia, catastrophizing, and hypervigilance were clinically relevant, but only local allodynia, hyperalgesia, catastrophizing, and hypervigilance were statistically different. Therefore, obvious altered CPP was not present at the group level in patients with FS compared with controls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel G Mertens
- Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk
- Pain in Motion International Research group
| | - Filip Struyf
- Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk
| | - Enrique Lluch Girbes
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels
- Pain in Motion International Research group
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Lirios Dueñas
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Olivier Verborgt
- Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, AZ Monica, Antwerp
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium
| | - Mira Meeus
- Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pain Management and Rehabilitation for Central Sensitization in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Comprehensive Review. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232012164. [PMID: 36293017 PMCID: PMC9602546 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232012164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are a group of musculoskeletal diseases affecting masticatory muscles and temporomandibular joints (TMJ). In this context, the chronic TMD could be considered as a condition with chronic primary orofacial pain, presenting as myofascial TMD pain or TMJ arthralgia. In this context, myogenous TMD may present overlapping features with other disorders, such as fibromyalgia and primary headaches, characterized by chronic primary pain related to dysfunction of the central nervous system (CNS), probably through the central sensitization. This phenomenon could be defined as an amplified response of the CNS to sensory stimuli and peripheral nociceptive, characterized by hyperexcitability in the dorsal horn neurons in the spinal cord, which ascend through the spinothalamic tract. The main objectives of the management of TMD patients are: decreasing pain, increasing TMJ function, and reducing the reflex masticatory muscle spasm/pain. The first-line treatments are physical therapy, pharmacological drugs, occlusal splints, laser therapy, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and oxygen–ozone therapy. Although all these therapeutic approaches were shown to have a positive impact on the central sensitization of TMD pain, there is still no agreement on this topic in the scientific literature. Thus, in this comprehensive review, we aimed at evaluating the evidence on pain management and rehabilitation for the central sensitization in TMD patients.
Collapse
|
31
|
de la Rosa-Díaz I, Barrero-Santiago L, Acosta-Ramírez P, Martín-Peces-Barba M, Iglesias-Hernández E, Plisset B, Lutinier N, Belzanne M, La Touche R, Grande-Alonso M. Cross-Sectional Comparative Study on Central Sensitization-Psychosocial Associated Comorbidities and Psychological Characteristics in Breast Cancer Survivors with Nociceptive Pain and Pain with Neuropathic Features and without Pain. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12091328. [PMID: 36143365 PMCID: PMC9505522 DOI: 10.3390/life12091328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment is still under research due to its complex and multifactorial underlying pathogenesis, including phycological factors. Further research is needed to elucidate more information about the factors that cause and perpetuate this pain. Thus, this study defined the influence of psychosocial and psychological factors on breast cancer survivors who report pain and those who do not. The psychosocial factors assessed were those that are associated with a central sensitization process, and the psychological factors were pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, anxiety and depression. Hence, the psychosocial symptom clusters were identified related to the clinical features of pain or to not reporting pain, which may encourage health clinicians to establish a customized biopsychosocial model focused on the management of pain-catastrophizing thoughts and fear of movement. Furthermore, anxiety and depression should be detected early by health professionals and referred to psychologists to be managed. Abstract The frequency of a high Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) total score and the prevalence of pain have already been established among breast cancer survivors (BCS). However, the psychological factors’ influence based on the clinical features of pain is still unknown, as well as BCS characteristics with no pain. Thus, our main aim was to evaluate the presence of a high CSI total score in BCS with pain and compare it with BCS without pain and to evaluate the influence of psychosocial factors. A cross-sectional comparative study was designed to compare BCS with nociceptive pain (n = 19), pain with neuropathic features (n = 19) or no pain (n = 19), classified by the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS). CSI, pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, anxiety and depression symptoms were analyzed and compared among the three groups. The CSI total score was higher in both BCS pain groups compared to BCS without pain, but there were no statistical differences between the pain groups. The same observation was made when comparing pain catastrophizing. The neuropathic feature group showed greater levels of fear of movement, anxiety and depression compared to the no pain group. Thus, CS-psychosocial associated comorbidities and pain-catastrophizing thoughts were more prevalent among BCS with pain, regardless of the clinical features of pain. BCS with neuropathic pain features showed greater psychological disturbances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene de la Rosa-Díaz
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Calle Ganímedes, n° 11, 28023 Madrid, Spain
- Physical Therapist in Women’s Health Research Group, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alcalá, Avenida de León, 3A, 28805 Madrid, Spain
- Motion in Brains Research Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Sciences of the Movement (INCIMOV), Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Calle Ganímedes, n° 11, 28023 Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Barrero-Santiago
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Calle Ganímedes, n° 11, 28023 Madrid, Spain
| | - Paz Acosta-Ramírez
- Physical Therapy in Torrejón Hospital, Rehabilitation Department, Calle Mateo Inurria, 28850 Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Martín-Peces-Barba
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Calle Ganímedes, n° 11, 28023 Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther Iglesias-Hernández
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Calle Ganímedes, n° 11, 28023 Madrid, Spain
| | - Bastien Plisset
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Calle Ganímedes, n° 11, 28023 Madrid, Spain
| | - Nicolás Lutinier
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Calle Ganímedes, n° 11, 28023 Madrid, Spain
| | - Margot Belzanne
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Calle Ganímedes, n° 11, 28023 Madrid, Spain
| | - Roy La Touche
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Calle Ganímedes, n° 11, 28023 Madrid, Spain
- Motion in Brains Research Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Sciences of the Movement (INCIMOV), Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Calle Ganímedes, n° 11, 28023 Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Dolor Craneofacial y Neuromusculoesquelético (INDCRAN), Calle Luisa Fernanda, n° 12, Bj Izq, 28023 Madrid, Spain
- Correspondence:
| | - Mónica Grande-Alonso
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Calle Ganímedes, n° 11, 28023 Madrid, Spain
- Motion in Brains Research Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Sciences of the Movement (INCIMOV), Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Calle Ganímedes, n° 11, 28023 Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Rehabilitación Funcional La Salle, Aravaca, 28850 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Valera-Calero JA, Úbeda-D'Ocasar E, Arias-Buría JL, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Gallego-Sendarrubias GM, Cigarán-Méndez M. Convergent Validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory in Women with Fibromyalgia: Association with Clinical, Psychological and Psychophysical Outcomes. Eur J Pain 2022; 26:2141-2151. [PMID: 35979630 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.2026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the relationship between demographic, clinical, psychological, and pressure pain sensitivity outcomes with the central sensitization inventory (CSI) in female with fibromyalgia (FMS). METHODS One hundred twenty-six (n=126) females with FMS completed demographic (age, body mass index, height, weight), clinical (pain history, pain intensity at rest and during daily living activities), psychological (depression/anxiety levels) outcomes and widespread pressure pain sensitivity as well as the central sensitization inventory (CSI). After conducting a multivariable correlation analysis to identify the association between variables, a multiple linear regression model was performed to identify CSI predictors. RESULTS The CSI was negatively associated with age (r=-0.262) and PPTs (r ranged from -0.221 to -0.372) and positively associated with anxiety (r=0.541), depression (r=0.415), mean intensity (r=0.305), worst pain (r=0.249), and pain during daily living activities (r= 0.398). The stepwise regression analysis revealed that 47.4% of CSI variance in this sample was explained by anxiety levels (27.8%), PPT at greater trochanter (10.5%), age (1.4%), years with pain (4.8%) and pain during daily living activities (2.9%). CONCLUSION The current study found that age, pain intensity at rest and pain during daily living activities, anxiety levels, and pressure pain sensitivity are associated with the CSI (associated sensitization symptoms) in women with FMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Antonio Valera-Calero
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, Universidad Camilo José Cela, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain
| | - Edurne Úbeda-D'Ocasar
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, Universidad Camilo José Cela, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Luis Arias-Buría
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Luque-Suarez A, Falla D, Barbero M, Pineda-Galan C, Marco D, Giuffrida V, Martinez-Calderon J. Digital pain extent is associated with pain intensity but not with pain-related cognitions and disability in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:727. [PMID: 35906575 PMCID: PMC9338608 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05700-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate whether digital pain extent is associated with an array of psychological factors such as optimism, pessimism, expectations of recovery, pain acceptance, and pain self-efficacy beliefs as well as to analyse the association between digital pain extent and pain intensity and pain-related disability in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in a primary health care setting was carried out including 186 individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Patient-reported outcomes were used to assess psychological factors, pain intensity, and pain-related disability. Digital pain extent was obtained from pain drawings shaded using a tablet and analysed using novel customized software. Multiple linear regression models were conducted to evaluate the association between digital pain extent and the aforementioned variables. Results Digital pain extent was statistically significantly associated with pain intensity. However, digital pain extent was not associated with any psychological measure nor with pain-related disability. Discussion The results did not support an association between digital pain extent and psychological measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Luque-Suarez
- Facultad de Ciencias de La Salud, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidad de Malaga, Malaga, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Malaga, Spain
| | - Deborah Falla
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Marco Barbero
- Rehabilitation Research Laboratory 2rLab, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, University of Applied, Manno/Landquart, Switzerland.
| | - Consolacion Pineda-Galan
- Facultad de Ciencias de La Salud, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidad de Malaga, Malaga, Spain
| | - Derboni Marco
- Istituto Dalle Molle Di Studi Sull'Intelligenza Artificiale (IDSIA), Scuola Universitaria Professionale Della Svizzera Italiana (SUPSI), Università Della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Vincenzo Giuffrida
- Istituto Dalle Molle Di Studi Sull'Intelligenza Artificiale (IDSIA), Scuola Universitaria Professionale Della Svizzera Italiana (SUPSI), Università Della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Javier Martinez-Calderon
- Facultad de Ciencias de La Salud, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidad de Malaga, Malaga, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Malaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Holm LA, Nim CG, Lauridsen HH, Filtenborg JB, O'Neill SF. "Convergent validity of the central sensitization inventory and experimental testing of pain sensitivity". Scand J Pain 2022; 22:597-613. [PMID: 34668367 DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the current study was to examine the convergent validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory by quantifying the correlation with experimental measures of pain sensitivity and self-reported psycho-social questionnaires, in a low back pain population. METHODS All participants were recruited from an outpatient hospital spine care clinic (Spine Centre of Southern Denmark). Participants underwent a standardized experimental pain test protocol and completed the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) along with additional self-reported questionnaires to assess psycho-social constructs across different domains. The association between the CSI, experimental pain measures and other self-reported psycho-social questionnaires were analyzed using correlation and contingency tests. ROC-curve analysis was used to determine sensitivity and specificity for CSI. RESULTS One hundred sixty-eight (168) participants were included. The CSI was weakly correlated with nine out of 20 variables in the experimental pain test protocol (rho range -0.37 to 0.22). The CSI was more closely correlated with psycho-social factors such as work ability, disability, and symptoms of exhaustion disorder. ROC-analysis identified an optimal cut-point of 44 on CSI (Sn=39.1% Sp=87.4%). The CSI had an area under the ROC curve of 0.656. Fisher's exact test demonstrated a statistically significant association between participants scoring ≥40 on CSI and participants categorized as sensitized by experimental pain tests (p-value=0.03). CONCLUSIONS Our findings are consistent with previous studies, indicating that the CSI is related to psycho-social constructs. However, the convergent validity with experimental pain measures is small and probably not clinically meaningful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam Andrén Holm
- Medical Research Unit, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, University Hospital of Southern, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Casper Glissmann Nim
- Medical Research Unit, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, University Hospital of Southern, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Henrik Hein Lauridsen
- Department of Sports and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Johanne Brinch Filtenborg
- Medical Research Unit, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, University Hospital of Southern, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Søren Francis O'Neill
- Medical Research Unit, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, University Hospital of Southern, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Nijs J, Huysmans E. Clinimetrics: The Central Sensitisation Inventory: a useful screening tool for clinicians, but not the gold standard. J Physiother 2022; 68:207. [PMID: 34895883 DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Nijs
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Chronic Pain Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Belgium; Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; University of Gothenburg Center for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eva Huysmans
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Chronic Pain Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Belgium; Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
den Bandt HL, Ickmans K, Leemans L, Nijs J, Voogt L. Differences in Quantitative Sensory Testing Outcomes Between Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care and Pain-free Controls. Clin J Pain 2022; 38:381-387. [PMID: 35440520 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) is used to test somatosensory functioning in on people with chronic LBP in secondary/tertiary health care facilities. Studies using QST-testing on LBP populations in primary care are scarce. Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) measures central sensitization (CS)-related symptoms and studies investigating the differences between QST-testing and participants with LBP with a positive and negative score on the CSI questionnaire are also rare. This case-control study investigates differences of an extensive QST-measurement between patients with acute, chronic LBP, and pain-free controls (PFCs) in primary care. Secondary aim is to investigate differences of an extensive QST-measurement between "CS" and "no-CS" group. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants with LBP were recruited from November 2016 to October 2019. Demographic and clinical information was collected and a standardized QST protocol was taken. Data analysis involved determining differences between groups. RESULTS Data of 100 participants with LBP and 50 PFCs were analyzed. Heat pain thresholds, pressure pain threshold, and conditioned pain modulation local and remote were significantly moderately to relatively strongly affected by acute, chronic LBP and PFCs (P<0.001 to 0.001). Lumbar temporal summation was significantly moderately affected by acute, chronic LBP, and PFCs (P=0.001). Only pressure pain threshold showed significant difference between "CS" and "no-CS" group (P=0.001 to 0.002). DISCUSSION Signs of enhanced nociceptive processing and disturbed top-down nociceptive modulation are apparent in people with acute and chronic LBP in primary care. Results indicate existence of central mechanisms in LBP in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hester L den Bandt
- Research Centre for Health Care Innovations, University of Applied Sciences Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy
| | - Kelly Ickmans
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy
- Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels
- Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lynn Leemans
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy
- Department of Rehabilitation Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
| | - Jo Nijs
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy
- Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels
| | - Lennard Voogt
- Research Centre for Health Care Innovations, University of Applied Sciences Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Dams L, Van der Gucht E, Haenen V, Devoogdt N, Smeets A, Morlion B, Bernar K, De Vrieze T, Moloney N, De Groef A, Meeus M. Questionnaire-based somatosensory profiling in breast cancer survivors: are we there yet? Associations between questionnaires and quantitative sensory testing. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 45:1865-1876. [PMID: 35617510 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2076931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pain and sensory disturbances are common side effects of breast cancer treatment. Differential somatosensory functioning may reflect distinct pathophysiological backgrounds and therapeutic needs. Aim was to examine whether questionnaires evaluating signs and symptoms related to somatosensory functioning correlate sufficiently with quantitative sensory testing (QST) in breast cancer survivors to warrant consideration for somatosensory profiling in clinical practice. METHODS One year after breast cancer surgery, 147 women underwent QST and completed following questionnaires: Douleur Neuropathique en 4 questions (DN4), Central Sensitization Inventory, Margolis Pain Diagram and Visual Analog Scales (VAS). Associations between the questionnaires and QST were evaluated using Spearman correlation coefficients (rs). RESULTS Significant but weak (rs < 0.30) correlations were found between total DN4 score and QST results at the inner upper arm for detection of sharp stimuli (rs = 0.227), cold stimuli (rs = -0.186), and painful heat stimuli (rs = 0.179), as well as between QST evaluating conditioned pain modulation and the Margolis Pain Diagram on one hand (rs = 0.176) and minimum-maximum pain intensity differences (VAS) on the other (rs = -0.170). CONCLUSION Questionnaires evaluating signs and symptoms related to somatosensory functioning are insufficient for somatosensory profiling. Although somatosensory profiling may be valuable in a mechanism-based management, more research on the most appropriate clinical tools is needed.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONClinicians should be able to recognize that patients with persistent pain or sensory disturbances following breast cancer surgery may have a component of altered somatosensory processing as a significant contributor to their complaint in order to address it appropriately.Somatosensory profiling has yet to be implemented into clinical practice.No evidence-based recommendations can be made on the use of self-reported questionnaires to assess somatosensory processing in a breast cancer population based on the findings of this study.It is suggested to combine information on how individuals process and experience somatosensory stimulation with information from the patient interview or questionnaires to consider which biological, psychological and/or social factors may drive or sustain these neurophysiological processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lore Dams
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Pain In Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elien Van der Gucht
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Pain In Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Haenen
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Pain In Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nele Devoogdt
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Vascular Surgery and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Center for Lymphedema, UZ Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Smeets
- Department of Surgical Oncology, UZ Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart Morlion
- The Leuven Centre for Algology and Pain Management, UZ-Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Section Anesthesiology and Algology, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Bernar
- The Leuven Centre for Algology and Pain Management, UZ-Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tessa De Vrieze
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Niamh Moloney
- Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.,THRIVE Physiotherapy, Guernsey, Guernsey
| | - An De Groef
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Pain In Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mira Meeus
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Pain In Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mibu A, Nishigami T, Tanaka K, Yono S, Manfuku M, Imai R. Does a combination of self‐reported signs related to central sensitization and pressure pain threshold allow for a more detailed classification of pain‐related characteristics in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain?: A cross‐sectional study. Pain Pract 2022; 22:556-563. [DOI: 10.1111/papr.13125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Mibu
- Department of Physical Therapy, Konan Women’s University Kobe Hyogo Japan
| | - Tomohiko Nishigami
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health and Welfare Prefectural University of Hiroshima Mihara Hiroshima Japan
| | | | - Satoko Yono
- Department of Rehabilitation, Tanabe Orthopaedics Osaka Osaka Japan
| | | | - Ryota Imai
- Department of Physical Therapy Osaka Kawasaki Rehabilitation University Osaka Japan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Detection of altered pain facilitatory and inhibitory mechanisms in patients with knee osteoarthritis by using a simple bedside tool kit (QuantiPain). Pain Rep 2022; 7:e998. [PMID: 35392651 PMCID: PMC8984378 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. A simple bedside quantitative sensory testing tool kit demonstrated acceptable reliability and assessment validity for detecting altered pain facilitatory and inhibitory mechanisms in patients with painful osteoarthritis. Purpose: Altered pain facilitatory and inhibitory mechanisms have been recognized as an important manifestation in patients with chronic pain, and quantitative sensory testing (QST) can act as a proxy for this process. We have recently developed a simple bedside QST tool kit (QuantiPain) for more clinical use. The purpose of this study was to investigate its test–retest reliability and to evaluate its validity compared with the laboratory-based QST protocols in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: QuantiPain consists of 3 items: “pressure algometer” (for pressure pain thresholds [PPTs]), “pinprick” (for temporal summation of pain [TSP]), and “conditioning clamp” (for conditioned pain modulation [CPM]). In experiment-A, intrarater and interrater test–retest reliabilities were investigated in 21 young healthy subjects by using interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). In experiment-B, 40 unilateral painful patients with OA and 40 age-matched, healthy control subjects were included to compare the bedside tool kit against the computerized pressure algometry. Results: In experiment-A, excellent to moderate intrarater and interrater reliabilities were achieved in PPT and TSP (ICC: 0.60–0.92) while the agreements of CPM were good to poor (ICC: 0.37–0.80). In experiment-B, localized and widespread decrease of PPT, facilitated TSP, and impaired CPM was found by using the bedside tool kit in patients with OA compared with controls (P < 0.05). The data were significantly correlated with the established laboratory-based tools (R = 0.281–0.848, P < 0.05). Conclusion: QuantiPain demonstrated acceptable test–retest reliability and assessment validity with the sensitivity to separate patients with painful OA from controls, which has a potential to create more practical approach for quantifying altered pain mechanisms in clinical settings.
Collapse
|
40
|
Simon E, Zsidó AN, Birkás B, Csathó Á. Pain catastrophizing, pain sensitivity and fear of pain are associated with early life environmental unpredictability: a path model approach. BMC Psychol 2022; 10:97. [PMID: 35399087 PMCID: PMC8996610 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-022-00800-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Socioeconomic disadvantages in the childhood environment might strongly influence beliefs and behavior characterizing the adult years. When children experience unpredictable and adverse situations, they develop an unpredictability schema with the core belief that situations are unpredictable. METHODS In two studies, we examined the association of childhood socioeconomic disadvantages with self-reported pain sensitivity, pain catastrophizing, and pain-related fear. Multidimensional survey measures were used to assess environmental conditions experienced in childhood. In addition, participants completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire, Body Awareness Questionnaire, Unpredictability Schema Questionnaire, and Fear of Pain Questionnaire. In Study 1 (N = 252), in separate models, we examined pain sensitivity and pain catastrophizing of a community sample of pain-free young individuals in association with their childhood experiences. In Study 2 (N = 293), in a new sample, but with a wider age range, we examined the association of early life socioeconomic disadvantages with pain-related fear. In both studies, the predictions were tested with Structural Equation Modeling. Our models constituted a path from childhood socioeconomic status and household unpredictability to pain variables via the factors of family resources, unpredictability schemas, and body awareness. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The findings converged on the conclusion that individuals experiencing disadvantageous early life conditions tended to have an elevated level of pain catastrophizing, higher perceived sensitivity to pain, and higher level of pain-related fear. These associations were mediated by an unpredictability schema and body awareness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eszter Simon
- Department of Behavioral Sciences, Medical School, University of Pécs, Szigeti str. 12, 7624, Pécs, Hungary
| | - András N Zsidó
- Institute of Psychology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Ifjúság str. 6, 7624, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Béla Birkás
- Department of Behavioral Sciences, Medical School, University of Pécs, Szigeti str. 12, 7624, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Árpád Csathó
- Department of Behavioral Sciences, Medical School, University of Pécs, Szigeti str. 12, 7624, Pécs, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Andias R, Silva AG. The Onset of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in High School Adolescents: Associated Factors and the Role of Symptoms of Central Sensitization. Phys Ther 2022; 102:6478902. [PMID: 34939105 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the association between sociodemographic data, physical activity, depression, anxiety, and stress, sleep, and self-reported symptoms of central sensitization at baseline, in asymptomatic adolescents, and the onset of pain at 6-months follow-up. METHODS A total of 252 asymptomatic adolescents were assessed at baseline with an online questionnaire that included sociodemographic data, the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire; the International Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents; the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale for Children; the Basic Scale on Insomnia complaints and Quality of Sleep; and the Central Sensitization Inventory. The same questionnaire was repeated at 6-months follow-up. RESULTS Of the 231 (91.7%) adolescents who completed the questionnaire at the follow-up, 127 (55.0%) remained asymptomatic and 88 (38.1%) reported a new onset of pain. At the 6-month follow-up, the mean (SD) number of painful body sites was 1.81 (1.04), and the neck region was the most reported (n = 29, 33%). Multivariable analysis showed that being female (OR = 2.34; 95% CI = 1.28-4.27) and reporting more self-reported symptoms of central sensitization (OR = 1.04; 95% CI = 1.01-1.07) were associated with the onset of chronic pain at follow-up. CONCLUSION Female sex and self-reported symptoms of central sensitization were considered risk factors for the onset of pain in adolescents but should be further explored in future studies. IMPACT Considering the increasing prevalence of chronic musculoskeletal pain in adolescents, understanding the factors that may be associated with its new onset may help to better design preventive strategies and thus minimize the appearance of this type of pain in adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Andias
- School of Health Sciences (ESSUA), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.,Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Porto, Portugal
| | - Anabela Gonçalves Silva
- School of Health Sciences (ESSUA), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.,Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS.UA), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Vriezekolk JE, Peters YAS, Steegers MAH, Davidson ENB, van den Ende CHM. Pain descriptors and determinants of pain sensitivity in knee osteoarthritis: a community-based cross-sectional study. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2022; 6:rkac016. [PMID: 35350719 PMCID: PMC8947773 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkac016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To explore pain characteristics in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), to compare pain sensitivity across individuals with KOA, chronic back pain (CBP) and pain-free individuals (NP), and to examine the relationship between clinical and pain characteristics with pain sensitivity in KOA.
Methods
Cross-sectional, community-based online survey. Two datasets were combined comprising Dutch individuals of ≥ 40 years of age, experiencing chronic knee pain (KOA, N = 445), chronic back pain (CBP, N = 504), or no pain (NP, N = 256). Demographic and clinical characteristics, global health, physical activity/exercise, and pain characteristics including intensity, spreading, duration, quality (SF-MPQ), and sensitivity (PSQ) were assessed. Differences between (sub)groups were examined using analyses of variance or Chi-square tests. Regression analyses were performed to examine determinants of pain sensitivity in the KOA group.
Results
Quality of pain was most commonly described as aching, tender, and tiring-exhausting. Overall, the KOA group had higher levels of pain sensitivity compared to NP group, but lower levels than the CBP group. Univariately, pain intensity, its variability and spreading, global health, exercise, and having comorbidities were weakly related to pain sensitivity (standardized betas: 0.12-0.27). Symptom duration was not related to pain sensitivity. Older age, higher levels of continuous pain, lower levels of global health, and exercise uniquely contributed, albeit modest, to pain sensitivity (P<0.05).
Conclusion
Continuous pain such as aching and tenderness in combination with decreased physical activity may be indicative for a subgroup of individuals at risk for pain sensitivity and, ultimately, poor treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna E Vriezekolk
- Department of Rheumatology Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Yvonne A S Peters
- Department of Rheumatology Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Monique A H Steegers
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences,Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Cornelia H M van den Ende
- Department of Rheumatology Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Matesanz-García L, Cuenca-Martínez F, Simón AI, Cecilia D, Goicoechea-García C, Fernández-Carnero J, Schmid AB. Signs Indicative of Central Sensitization Are Present but Not Associated with the Central Sensitization Inventory in Patients with Focal Nerve Injury. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11041075. [PMID: 35207360 PMCID: PMC8876893 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11041075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common focal nerve injury. People with CTS may show alterations in central processing of nociceptive information. It remains unclear whether the central sensitization inventory (CSI) is capable of detecting such altered central pain processing. Methods: Thirty healthy volunteers were matched with 30 people with unilateral CTS from the orthopaedic waitlist. Changes to central pain processing were established through psychophysical sensory testing (bilateral pressure pain thresholds (PPT), conditioned pain modulation, temporal summation) and pain distribution on body charts. Patients also completed pain severity and function questionnaires, psychological questionnaires and the CSI. Results: Compared to healthy volunteers, patients with CTS have lower PPTs over the carpal tunnel bilaterally (t = −4.06, p < 0.0001 ipsilateral and t = −4.58, p < 0.0001 contralateral) and reduced conditioned pain modulation efficacy (t = −7.31, p <0.0001) but no differences in temporal summation (t = 0.52, p = 0.60). The CSI was not associated with psychophysical measures or pain distributions indicative of altered central pain processing. However, there was a correlation of the CSI with the Beck Depression Inventory (r = 0.426; p = 0.019). Conclusion: Patients with CTS show signs of altered central pain mechanisms. The CSI seems unsuitable to detect changes in central pain processing but is rather associated with psychological factors in people with focal nerve injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Matesanz-García
- Escuela Internacional de Doctorado, Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain;
- Department of Physiotherap, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain
| | - Ferran Cuenca-Martínez
- Exercise Intervention for Health Research Group (EXINH-RG), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Ana Isabel Simón
- Unit of Elbow-Hand, Service de Traumatología, Hospital Severo Ochoa, 28911 Leganés, Spain;
| | - David Cecilia
- Unit of Elbow-Hand, Service de Traumatología, Hospital 12 de Octubre, 28048 Madrid, Spain;
- Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Vithas La Milagrosa, 28010 Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Goicoechea-García
- Department Basic Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain;
- Grupo Multidisciplinar de Investigación y Tratamiento del Dolor, Grupo de Excelencia Investigadora URJC-Banco de Santander, 28922 Madrid, Spain
| | - Josué Fernández-Carnero
- Grupo Multidisciplinar de Investigación y Tratamiento del Dolor, Grupo de Excelencia Investigadora URJC-Banco de Santander, 28922 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain
- Correspondence: (J.F.-C.); (A.B.S.)
| | - Annina B. Schmid
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
- Correspondence: (J.F.-C.); (A.B.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bittencourt JV, Bezerra MC, Pina MR, Reis FJJ, de Sá Ferreira A, Nogueira LAC. Use of the painDETECT to discriminate musculoskeletal pain phenotypes. Arch Physiother 2022; 12:7. [PMID: 35172904 PMCID: PMC8851806 DOI: 10.1186/s40945-022-00129-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Musculoskeletal pain patients present similar pain characteristics regardless of the clinical diagnosis. PainDETECT questionnaire is useful for screening neuropathic-like symptoms in many musculoskeletal conditions. However, no previous studies compared pain phenotypes of patients with musculoskeletal pain using the painDETECT. Therefore, the current study aimed to compare the pain characteristics of patients with musculoskeletal pain classified according to the painDETECT as nociceptive pain, unclear, and neuropathic-like symptoms. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in 308 participants with musculoskeletal pain. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants were examined. Neuropathic-like symptoms, pain intensity, pain area, Central Sensitization-related sign and symptoms, functional limitation, and conditioned pain modulation were assessed in patients with musculoskeletal pain. Independent one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for between-group differences for the outcome measures with continuous variables and Pearson chi-square test verified between-group differences on the efficiency of the conditioned pain modulation. Results Participants had a mean age of 52.21 (±15.01) years old and 220 (71.42%) were females. One hundred seventy-three (56.16%) participants present nociceptive pain, 69 (22.40%) unclear, and 66 (21.42%) neuropathic-like symptoms. A one-way ANOVA showed differences for the pain intensity [F (2,305) = 20.097; p < .001], pain area [F (2,305) = 28.525; p < .001], Central Sensitization-related sign and symptoms [F (2,305) = 54.186; p < .001], and functional limitation [F (2,256) = 8.061; p < .001]. However, conditioned pain modulation was similarly impaired among the three groups (X2 = 0.333, p = 0.847). Conclusion Patients with neuropathic-like symptoms revealed unfavorable pain characteristics compared to their counterparts, including pain intensity, generalized pain, Central Sensitization-related sign and symptoms, and functional limitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Valentim Bittencourt
- Rehabilitation Science Postgraduate Program at Augusto Motta University Centre (UNISUAM), Paris, 84, Bonsucesso, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 21041-020, Brazil.
| | - Márcia Cliton Bezerra
- Rehabilitation Science Postgraduate Program at Augusto Motta University Centre (UNISUAM), Paris, 84, Bonsucesso, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 21041-020, Brazil
| | - Mônica Rotondo Pina
- Rehabilitation Science Postgraduate Program at Augusto Motta University Centre (UNISUAM), Paris, 84, Bonsucesso, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 21041-020, Brazil
| | - Felipe José Jandre Reis
- Physiotherapy Department at Federal Institute of Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Arthur de Sá Ferreira
- Rehabilitation Science Postgraduate Program at Augusto Motta University Centre (UNISUAM), Paris, 84, Bonsucesso, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 21041-020, Brazil
| | - Leandro Alberto Calazans Nogueira
- Rehabilitation Science Postgraduate Program at Augusto Motta University Centre (UNISUAM), Paris, 84, Bonsucesso, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 21041-020, Brazil.,Physiotherapy Department at Federal Institute of Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Koga M, Shigetoh H, Tanaka Y, Morioka S. Characteristics of clusters with contrasting relationships between central sensitization-related symptoms and pain. Sci Rep 2022; 12:2626. [PMID: 35173213 PMCID: PMC8850439 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06453-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The central sensitization inventory (CSI) evaluates the central sensitization (CS)-related symptoms associated with increased pain sensitivity. However, the CSI includes items that are not directly related to pain. In this study, 146 patients with pain were classified into subgroups by k-means cluster analysis based on the short form of the central sensitization inventory (CSI9) and pain scores. In addition, inter-group and multiple comparisons were performed to examine the characteristics of each group. As a result of this study, there were three subgroups (clusters 1, 2, and 3) in which the CSI9 and pain intensity were both low, moderate, and high, and one subgroup (cluster 4) in which only CSI9 was high and pain intensity was low. Two subgroups with high CSI9 scores but contrasting pain intensities (clusters 3 and 4) were extracted; the pattern of CS-related symptoms in these two groups was very similar, with no differences in most of the non-pain factors. It is necessary to consider these points when interpreting the clinical condition of a patient with pain when using the assessment of CS-related symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Koga
- Department of Neurorehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kio University, 4-2-2, Umaminaka, Koryo-cho, Kitakatsuragi-gun, Nara, 635-0832, Japan. .,Department of Rehabilitation, Kyowakai Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Hayato Shigetoh
- Department of Neurorehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kio University, 4-2-2, Umaminaka, Koryo-cho, Kitakatsuragi-gun, Nara, 635-0832, Japan
| | - Yoichi Tanaka
- Department of Neurorehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kio University, 4-2-2, Umaminaka, Koryo-cho, Kitakatsuragi-gun, Nara, 635-0832, Japan
| | - Shu Morioka
- Department of Neurorehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kio University, 4-2-2, Umaminaka, Koryo-cho, Kitakatsuragi-gun, Nara, 635-0832, Japan.,Neurorehabilitation Research Center, Kio University, Nara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Dams L, Van der Gucht E, Haenen V, Lauwers M, De Pauw S, Steurs T, Devoogdt N, Smeets A, Bernar K, De Vrieze T, De Groef A, Meeus M. Biopsychosocial risk factors for pain and pain-related disability 1 year after surgery for breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:4465-4475. [PMID: 35112213 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06805-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Knowledge regarding risk factors for pain in the long term after surgery for breast cancer may be of great value in preventing this prevalent and debilitating side effect. Despite the biopsychosocial nature of pain, the predictive value of both pre- and postoperative biopsychosocial functioning for long-term pain intensity and pain-related disability has not yet been studied. METHODS One hundred sixty-six women planned for unilateral breast cancer surgery were included in this prospective cohort study. Pre- and postoperative outcomes related to pain, psychosocial, and somatosensory functioning (questionnaires and quantitative sensory testing) were evaluated as risk factors for pain intensity (visual analog scale) and pain-related disability (pain disability index) 1 year after surgery for breast cancer. Both bivariable and stepwise linear regression analyses were performed. RESULTS The most consistent biopsychosocial risk factors were symptoms related to altered central somatosensory functioning (central sensitization inventory), psychological symptoms, and social support (psychological symptoms and support subscale of McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire). Results also showed that a pre- and postoperative disturbed functioning of the somatosensory nervous system in the surgical area could provide additional information regarding pain intensity or pain-related disability in the long term after surgery for breast cancer. CONCLUSION This study revealed several biopsychosocial characteristics that might be used to identify women more vulnerable to have pain and pain-related disability in the long term after surgery for breast cancer, allowing for more effective pain management and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lore Dams
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken - Universiteitsplein 1, R.315, 2610 Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium. .,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. .,Pain In Motion International Research Group, http://www.paininmotion.be, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Elien Van der Gucht
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Pain In Motion International Research Group, http://www.paininmotion.be, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Haenen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken - Universiteitsplein 1, R.315, 2610 Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Pain In Motion International Research Group, http://www.paininmotion.be, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Magalie Lauwers
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken - Universiteitsplein 1, R.315, 2610 Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sofie De Pauw
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken - Universiteitsplein 1, R.315, 2610 Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Tinne Steurs
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken - Universiteitsplein 1, R.315, 2610 Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Nele Devoogdt
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Vascular Surgery and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Center for Lymphedema, UZ Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Smeets
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Bernar
- The Leuven Centre for Algology and Pain Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tessa De Vrieze
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken - Universiteitsplein 1, R.315, 2610 Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An De Groef
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken - Universiteitsplein 1, R.315, 2610 Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Pain In Motion International Research Group, http://www.paininmotion.be, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mira Meeus
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken - Universiteitsplein 1, R.315, 2610 Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium.,Pain In Motion International Research Group, http://www.paininmotion.be, Brussels, Belgium.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Granot M, Srulovici E, Granovsky Y, Yarnitsky D, Kuperman P. Dispositional and situational personal features and acute post-collision head and neck pain: Double mediation of pain catastrophizing and pain sensitivity. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0262076. [PMID: 35007302 PMCID: PMC8746745 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Pain variability can be partially attributed to psycho-cognitive features involved in its processing. However, accumulating research suggests that simple linear correlation between situational and dispositional factors may not be sufficiently explanatory, with some positing a role for mediating influences. In addition, acute pain processing studies generally focus on a post-operative model with less attention provided to post-traumatic injury. As such, this study aimed to investigate a more comprehensive pain processing model that included direct and indirect associations between acute pain intensity in the head and neck, pain catastrophizing (using pain catastrophizing scale (PCS)), and pain sensitivity (using the pain sensitivity questionnaire (PSQ)), among 239 patients with post-motor vehicle collision pain. The effect of personality traits (using Ten Items Personality Inventory (TIPI)) and emotional status (using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)) on that model was examined as well. To this end, three Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analyses were conducted. Overall, the data had good fit to all the models, with only PSQ found to have a direct correlation with acute pain intensity. The SEM analyses conversely revealed several mediations. Specifically, that: first, PSQ fully mediated the relationship between PCS and pain intensity; second, PCS and PSQ together fully mediated the relationship between conscientiousness (personality trait) and pain intensity; and finally, emotional status had direct and indirect links with PSQ and pain intensity. In conclusion, these models suggest that during the acute post-collision phase, pain sensitivity intermediates between emotional states and personality traits, partially via elevated pain catastrophizing thoughts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Granot
- Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | | | - Yelena Granovsky
- Faculty of Medicine, Technion- Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - David Yarnitsky
- Faculty of Medicine, Technion- Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
- Department of Neurology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Pora Kuperman
- Department of Neurology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Schuttert I, Timmerman H, Petersen KK, McPhee ME, Arendt-Nielsen L, Reneman MF, Wolff AP. The Definition, Assessment, and Prevalence of (Human Assumed) Central Sensitisation in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2021; 10:5931. [PMID: 34945226 PMCID: PMC8703986 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10245931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Central sensitisation is assumed to be one of the underlying mechanisms for chronic low back pain. Because central sensitisation is not directly assessable in humans, the term 'human assumed central sensitisation' (HACS) is suggested. The objectives were to investigate what definitions for HACS have been used, to evaluate the methods to assess HACS, to assess the validity of those methods, and to estimate the prevalence of HACS. Database search resulted in 34 included studies. Forty different definition references were used to define HACS. This review uncovered twenty quantitative methods to assess HACS, including four questionnaires and sixteen quantitative sensory testing measures. The prevalence of HACS in patients with chronic low back pain was estimated in three studies. The current systematic review highlights that multiple definitions, assessment methods, and prevalence estimates are stated in the literature regarding HACS in patients with chronic low back pain. Most of the assessment methods of HACS are not validated but have been tested for reliability and repeatability. Given the lack of a gold standard to assess HACS, an initial grading system is proposed to standardize clinical and research assessments of HACS in patients with a chronic low back.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Schuttert
- Pain Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9750 RA Groningen, The Netherlands; (I.S.); (H.T.)
| | - Hans Timmerman
- Pain Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9750 RA Groningen, The Netherlands; (I.S.); (H.T.)
| | - Kristian K. Petersen
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark; (K.K.P.); (M.E.M.); (L.A.-N.)
| | - Megan E. McPhee
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark; (K.K.P.); (M.E.M.); (L.A.-N.)
| | - Lars Arendt-Nielsen
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark; (K.K.P.); (M.E.M.); (L.A.-N.)
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology (Mech-Sense), Aalborg University Hospital, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Michiel F. Reneman
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9750 RA Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - André P. Wolff
- Pain Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9750 RA Groningen, The Netherlands; (I.S.); (H.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Inal FY, Gul K, Yilmaz Camgoz Y, Daskaya H, Kocoglu H. Validation of the Turkish version of the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire in patients with chronic pain. J Int Med Res 2021; 49:3000605211060158. [PMID: 34855531 PMCID: PMC8646826 DOI: 10.1177/03000605211060158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) is a clinically beneficial instrument that has been proven to be correlated with various experimental pain sensitivity assessments in healthy people and in patients with chronic pain. In this study, we aimed to translate the PSQ into Turkish (PSQ-T) and validate it for the measurement of pain sensitivity among Turkish people. Methods Seventy-three patients with chronic back pain who were planning to undergo an interventional procedure completed the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and PSQ prior to their procedure. Subcutaneous infiltration of lidocaine was used as a standardized experimental pain stimulus. Pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS 1: infiltration in the hand, and VAS 2: infiltration in the procedure area) Results Scores on the PSQ-T were significantly correlated with those on the BPI-SF. A significant positive relationship was observed between VAS 1 and VAS 2 values and the PSQ-T score, BPI pain score, and BPI interference score. Conclusions The PSQ-T can be used as a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of pain sensitivity in the Turkish population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferda Yilmaz Inal
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul 34000, Turkey
| | - Kursat Gul
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul 34000, Turkey
| | - Yadigar Yilmaz Camgoz
- Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Sultan Abdülhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34000, Turkey
| | - Hayrettin Daskaya
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul 34000, Turkey
| | - Hasan Kocoglu
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul 34000, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Brazenor GA, Malham GM, Teddy PJ. Can Central Sensitization after injury persist as an autonomous pain generator? - A comprehensive search for evidence. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 23:1283-1298. [PMID: 34718773 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnab319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct a comprehensive search for evidence whether Central Sensitization following an injury can act as a persistent autonomous pain generator after the inducing injury has healed. METHODS We searched Medline on PubMed and the Cochrane Library, screening 3,572 abstracts, from which 937 full text articles were obtained, with 186 of these discarded as irrelevant to the question being posed. The remaining 751 articles were studied for evidence. RESULTS Fourteen publications were judged to provide weak evidence for the hypothesis of central sensitization as a persisting autonomous pain generator, but none addressed the question directly. No strong evidence for the affirmative answer was found.Sixty-two publications were judged to provide weak evidence for a negative answer, and nine judged to provide strong evidence.Unexpectedly, serious weaknesses were discovered in the literature underpinning the validity of the clinical diagnosis of Central Sensitization in man:(i) Inappropriate extrapolation, in many publications, of laboratory animal data to humans.(ii) Failure to demonstrate the absence of peripheral pain generators which might be perpetuating Central Sensitization.(iii) Many factors now shown to confound what is being measured by quantitative sensory testing, conditioned pain modulation, and Central Sensitization Inventory. CONCLUSIONS We found no evidence proving that central sensitization can persist as an autonomous pain generator after the initiating injury has healed.Our review has also shown that the evidential basis for the diagnosis of CS in individual patients is seriously in question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Peter J Teddy
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|